The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About218 California Drive - Staff Report (2)Item #1 Study Item City of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit to Allow Non Automobile Related Retail Sales in Subarea D of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area Address: 210 California Drive Meeting Date: 7/14/03 Request: Conditional use permit to allow non-automobile related retail sales in Subarea D of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area, zoned C-2 (C.S. 25.38.031, a). Applicant: A1 Heriz APN: 029-213-030 Property Owner: Baum Trust Lot Area: 13,186 SF General Plan: Service & Special Sales Zoning: G2, Subarea D Adjacent Development: Auto Sales, Auto Parts, and Furniture and Rug Retail Stores Previous Use: Proposed Use: Allowable Use: Retail Clothes Sales Retail Rug Sales and Instrument Repair Automobile Sales, Service, and Storage History: On November 26, 2001, the Planning Commission approved by consent calendar a conditional use permit to allow retail clothes sales at 210 California Drive, zoned G2, Subarea D(conditional use permit required for non-automobile related retail sales in this zoning district) (November 26, 2001 P.C. Minutes). The retail clothing business recently closed and the applicant would now like to propose a retail use which is non- automobile related (rug sales and instrument repair). The applicant currently has a retail rug sales business at 218 California Drive (conditional use permit granted in September, 2000). This building contains five tenant spaces with frontage on California Drive between 210 and 218. This applicant would use one at each end of the five, with the three middle spaces leased to other tenants. Summary:. The applicant is proposing to open a retail rug sales and music instrument repair business at 210 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D. Any retail use other than those related to automobile sales, service, and storage are allowed only with a special permit in Subarea D, Auto Row. The proposed retail business would occupy the entire 1,750 SF space. The applicant is proposing to sell rugs and offer music instrument repair service at this site. There are no exterior changes proposed, so commercial design review is not required for this project. Most of the 1,750 SF space would be used for the sales area and instrument repair. The rear of the space includes a 216 SF storage room, a 90 SF office, and a 144 SF restroom behind the sales floor (all included in the 1,750 SF total). The store hours would be 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., seven days a week. There would be two full-time employees working at the store, with an increase to three in the next two to five years. It is anticipated that there would be 5 customers visiting the site on weekdays and 10 customers on wcckends, and that number is expected to stay the same in two to five years. The applicant expects a maximum of six people on-site at any one time. The subject property is a through lot with frontage on California Drive on the west side and West Lane on the east side, at the rear. There are a total of six retail spaces (including 210) that are on this parcel. Four of the spaces (including 210) front on California Drive and two of the spaces front on West Lane. The previous use of Coraditional Use Permit 210 C.alifornia Drive this space was a retail clothing store. The adjacent uses along California Drive include a retail furniture store,a rug store, and the Pez Museum. The retail spaces at 216 and 218 California Drive are currently vacant. The businesses at the rear of the parcel along West Lane include a pet salon and a car stereo and alarm store. The building is non-conforming with no on-site parking available. The code requires retail uses to provide one on-site parking space per 400 SF. Based upon this standard, 5 on-site parking spaces are required for a retail use in this space. The previous use of the space, a retail clothing store, was considered a retail use, therefore no additional parking is required because the use is staying the same and the nonconformity is not being increased. The applicant notes that merchandise for this tenant space will be delivered to the existing rug sales business at 218 California Drive, approximately one to two times a week during operating business hours. Select merchandise will then be moved to 210 California Drive by the applicant. Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: *Retail Rug Sales and Retail Clothing Store Auto Related Sales, Service, and Music Instrument Storage Repair All non-auto related uses require a Conditional Use Permit Parking: 0 0 5 spaces No change (non-conforming) (1 space per 400 SF of retail space) * Conditional use permit required for all non-auto related uses in the C-2, Subarea D zoning district. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The Chief Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and Recycling Specialist review this request and had no comments. Ruben Hurin Planner c: A1 Heriz, applicant E City of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit for Retail Use Address: 218 California Drive It�m # C Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 8/28/00 Request: Conditional Use Permit for retail use in an e�sting building at 218 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D - Auto Row (C.S. 25.38.031 (2)). Applicant: A1 Heriz Property Owner: Isaac & Evelyn Baumelgruen Lot Area: 19,563 SF General Plan: Commercial, Service and Special Sales Adjacent Development: Commercial and retail uses APN: 029-213-030 Zoning: G2, subarea D CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances. Previous Use: Furniture Sales - California Futon Proposed Use: Retail Sales - Oriental Rugs Allowable Use: Retail use other than those related to automobile sales and services with a Conditional Use permit. Summary: The applicant, A1 Heriz, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a retail use for operation of a retail rug store in an existing building at 218 California Drive. Any retail use which is not related to automobile sales and service requires a Conditional Use Permit in the C-2, Subarea D zoning district. The previous use of this tenant space was California Futons, a furniture store. The store will be open seven days a week, 10:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. The store intends to have 2 full-time employeeS and one part-time employee seven days a week. The number of employees is expected to stay the same over a five year period. The maximum number of customers expected to come to the site per day is 3 on weekdays and 5 on weekends. The maximum number of people on site at any one time is expected to be four. The building has no on-site parking and is e�sting nonconforming in parking because it was built prior to the code requirements for parking. Since this use is a replacement of an existing retail use a parking variance is not required. The building owner leases unimproved land adjacent to the Caltrain railroad tracks behind the building across East Lane, which is available for customer parking. The leased area is not paved or striped so the exact number of spaces available is unclear. The leased area is 15' x 200'. The lease is a one-year lease which is automatically renewed each year, and can be terminated by Caltrain on 15 days written notice. The lease has been in effect since 1981. Public parking is available on the street and in Lot V, across Burlingame Avenue from the site, and in Lot M, across California Avenue from the site. There are four other tenant spaces in this building, Computer Spectrum, an internet publisher, Rock & Roll, auto stereo and alarms, Bark Station, a dog grooming business, and a vacant tenant space. The five tenants share a restroom facility located towards the rear of the building. Conditional Use Permit for Retail Sales Use: Parking: Proposed *Retail, Rug Store 0 *Conditional Use permit required for retail use. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Conditional Use permit for non-auto retail use 0 Site is existing nonconforming in parking - req. pkg. ratio is 1:400 GSF Staff Comments: The Chief Building Inspector, the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal had no comments on this project. Study Meeting: At the August 14, 2000 Planning Commission study meeting, the commission asked what was the estimated number of customers daily at the existing futon shop. Planning staff would note that the futon shop operator estimated that 17 customers per day would visit the site on weekdays and 23 customers per day on weekends. The commission noted that the maximum number of daily customers estimated for the rug shop seemed low, would the applicant review this number. The applicant has submitted the attached letter date stamped August 17, 2000 which states that they expect 2-3 customers per day on weekdays and 3-5 customers per day on weekends. He notes that he feels this projection is correct, because most of their clients are business customers buy larger numbers of rugs and are seen by appointment. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. 2l8 California Drive Previous Allowed/Req'd Retail, Furniture Store Findings: Based on the fact that the proposed business is similar in nature to the previous retail use on the site (furniture store), the business is found to be compatible with other uses in the area and complies with the findings for a conditional use permit. Conditional Use Permit for Retail Sales 218 California Drive Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Af�irmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: that the tenant space shall be operated as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped June 27, 2000, and access to the shared bathroom facilities shall be maintained; 2. that the business shall not be open for business except during the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m, seven days a week, and if the number of customers exceeds 20 per day, this permit shall be reviewed; that if property owner loses the lease to the supplemental parking provided on the Caltrain right-of-way, he shall inform the City of the change and the conditional use permit for the non-auto related use shall be subject to review; 4. that the area leased for parking from Caltrain shall be posted for the use of employees and customers of tenants of this site and parking usage shall be enforced by the property owner; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Maureen Brooks Planner c: A1 Heriz, applicant City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes August 14, 2000 218 CALIFORNIA DRIVE - ZONED G1, SUBAREA D- APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RETAIL USE (RUG SALES) 1N AUTO ROW (AL HERIZ, APPLICANT; ISAAC AND EVELYN RAiTN1F.T.C�'TRTTF.N� PR(IPF.RTY (�WNF.RCI CP Monroe presented the staff report. Commissioners asked: what was the estimated number of customers daily at the Futon Shop; the maximum number of daily customers seems low, would the applicant review this number before the action. Since this use is similar to the retail use previously on this site, with review of the additional information, this item should be placed on the consent calendar for the next meeting. Chair Keighran set this item for the consent calendar on the August 28, 2000, meeting providing that the information submittal of the requested information to the Planning Department is timely and complete, and that there is space on that agenda. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 1349 VANCOUVER A UE - ZONED R-1 -,APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECkAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A W TWO-STORY H�SE (JAMES CHU, APPLI�ANT AND DESIGNEI�ON GROVE, AR(IAFRTV (l\xIl�1F 1 . � � Reference sta report, 8.14.00, wit attachments. City Planner resented the report, r�iewed criteria, Planning Department mrnents and conditio . Commissioner asked h much of the roof was ver 30 feet, staff suggested that the a licant might want to dress that issue. � ; i Cha' Keighran opened th public hearing. James C, designer, 39 W. 43r treet, San Mateo, represented the a lication. He noted th about 12 feet in width, 6 eet on each site, of bot ridges of the roof were over 30 feet in eight as shown on Sh t A-3. There were no ot er questions of the appl' ant. Frank Shaffer, 13 S Vancouver, and Jennifey'Addiego, 1346 DeSoto oke. He expressed concern about the erall height of the pr osed house, noting that t e lot has a steep rise at t front, so a taller building will look mas ' e from the street; thi lock still has the origin�ungalows on it, from t side of his house the new wall goes str ight up for two floors there are a number of '� dows looking out over is property; he is also concerned abou site drainage. There is heritage tree between e proposed house and oposed garage which will be removed which should be prote ed. Applicant commen d that the first floor of t is house is 10 feet higher than average op of curb, this is a cra man design with 8 foo nd 9 foot ceiling height , the neighbor to the right has more t n the required setback b ause of the driveway be een the properties; the t e is not an issue since can add more t es to screen between the wo properties. CP Mo oe noted that removal of e protected tree would require that th applicant get a tree removal permit from the Beaut' ication Commission, Pl ning action did not predetermine Be tification's action. Live to the rear of the new pro' ct, was not aware that th intend to remove any trees, 2 existin trees are important to screen this project from her iew, would be concern� if they were removed. The public h ring was closed. Commission iscussion: agree that t trees should be retained, landscape p n shows a number of trees to be p nted they shou be larger scale to scree he rear and front of the house given it eight; missed the tree removal, w ld like to see t applicant do what they an to retain the protected tree at the re , should show the drip line, need arborists repo on the tree and the effe of modified plans at rear on the tree� ould relocate the garage, it's no .5 feet from th property line, can be ved over; would even consider a var' nce to the width of the garage to reserve the tree long as the square foo�age (FAR) is not added to the house. As noted the rise at the front of t lot contributes to the height of the stru re, have a special permit to all roof itches which fit architectural styl , this roof is need for this design; concer d about the windows on the side op site the driveway, need to bala e the number and not be overbearing, sho d not remove all the windows, do no want that side to look like a warehouse. Unapproved Minutes -3- HERIZ RUG CENTER D irect Importers of �1{ ine Hand-Loomed Oriental X ugs 1235 BROADWAY AVENUE * BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL(650)344-9414 * FAX(650)344-9484 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Department, 8/ 15/2000 This letter is to clarify section 5 of the commercial application of the planning commision application supplemental form. Under the current and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site we wrote: weekdays: 2-3 (per day) weekends: 3-5 (per day} This is the projection for visitors per day. Most of our clients see us by appointment. Thank you very much for your time. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, �, j -- — Ali-Hef is RECEIVED AUG 1 7 2000 CITY OF BURLlN�AME PLANNING DEPT. � ,4r� c�r o. BURLIN4AMi; CITY OF BURLINGAME � APPLICATION TO TI� PLANNING CONIlVIISSION �e� ..._% Type of Application: x Special Permit Variance Other Proj ect Address: �� ps. n`- ,�r . Assessor's Parcel Number(s): APPLICANT Name: �L I-�i ✓ , -i.. �v Address: � 23 � l� �� y City/State/Zip: �'^��'^�••r�.t f ya/ o Phone (w): 3 �I �f - qy� y (h): 3y3 - 3'1 �� f�: 3y�- yv�y ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (w): (h): fax: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S vS� � %b c�r,�, qr, . /h� S � ��„K/ ��i �i. PROPERTY OWNER Name: %Sh c� ^ �vr./y,.� �a✓� Address: /6�'i ��-~ City/State/Zip: n�,�v✓rc,S � G,� y�j/ ZZ Phone (w): yaf' ZS`,� 6Z/�-1 �h�: y�,�• 66/ � 3�5� f�: � � �,� �� - 3L,�'y _7 �.�� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. �� . �.,�� w�,.•, f�, !� s ��. / %t F-t ,/ '`► J�. AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and conect to the b of my knowledge and belief. , � � —dp Appli t s Signature Date I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ��2� �.�-}�-c�c` �i-e ci Property Owner's Signature Date r,c ----------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY -----��-�rf�� t-ti------------- Date Filed: Fee: JUN 2 7 2000 Planning Commission: S tudy Date: Action Date: C I T Y 0 F B U R L I N G A M E r. FROM : SAMSaN PHONE N0. : 408 741 8074 JUN. 27 20aP �1::��7PM P2 JUN �� '0�3 1?�'��Pfi fAUM�LL-12�h��1'�c5w F.1 FF2'JM : SRh150N PFiaN� N0. : 408 7�; 8�74 ,TUN. �7 260Q Q1:07P1� . et•ez. �� et: aa FRo;� ro 14C'7�t 1 c�e-a P.92 '� CITX OF BU1�.Iri��iM� ��; �a�c��za:� To � �omav�ssra�v 'I�� o� Ap��i�atian: x Spc�cYal Permi�varf�x,_....._,Ca�h�t ProJ�cr �c�dress. �d�„ �Or'+�« JQi". �- ' � � -. t'�,ssessar's Parcex N'usz�be�r(s): � �PP.J�CAN'T N�s'n�: �L � r's., Addt�ess: 1 Z':� � �3ir� �i�.,y ..�� ` �.tytStatel�i,p� �?` �'_"� 9�a� a Phat;� (w) : � � � " �� / `� �,): 3�3 - 3 K �,�' �. 3�t�- ��a�y • , ��,,._�._� ARCH,iTEC'�IDESIGNER P�dI��'�.' OWriEYt x�me�: 7s�t �� C,�e.� ,,, t34w•�. A$dz�: /�� CitylSi�oeJ�p: �+ G� G,� � � Phone (w)• �o� "��» 6 � 1 � � �; 5�i�* 6�/ - 3�59 faR; �� ,r �i �-6� � � ��,�'� �'�•� Nams: Addxc�SS: City/S�abelL"zp: Phor�e (w�: C�): Pl�tse indicate wi#h an ast�c%sk * the cv�t�t person far tl�is application. fax: P],tC}JF,C'x' D�CItI�tOt�: vS� �� " /'G�.I �'► �'f+ �2�_�o c�� — --- . . ��.,.� ,��.�..�.. _..� �.� AFFIDA'YITISIGNA'TCTR�: I hereby c�fY '�der P�rY �f F�'J�Y t� the �tiaa given 3�ea�in is a�ue and corr�ct to the o� my l�nwledg�e ar�d be�ief. . _�� .y a�� s�gn�re � �.a� I know aba�t_ t� gza,pas�d applic,�tian artd hcn�y atttharir� r�e sbcrv�e �ppiic�t to subr�it this appl3�c�iioa to th� �'l�z�uing Ccepr�i.saiio�n• r �/�.7/� � �� a� -�OR dFFTC.� i7S� QNT�.Y �----�...�.._._....�_�__�........� I3ste i�ile�d; Poe: ' DSo��nihr f`n�ee�ino�hw. CP��r]v Tlata• ��kiAn i�lsfa• rs ��a� p��p�� p�� 1345 Howard Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 • Phone (650) 347-9861 • Fax (650) 340-1463 June 27, 2000 Margaret Monroe c/o City of Burlingame re: 218 California Dr., Burlingame Dear Margaret; Please accept this application on behalf of my clients M/M Isacc Baum (owners) and Ali Heriz (tenant) to lease the retail space located at 218 California Dr., Burlingame. You will find that all the application papers are in order for Mr. Heriz' business use application. Mr. Heriz currently operates Heriz Rug Center at 1235 Broadway, Burlingame. To answer one question you may have conceming his use and parking. The building currently has 20 car parking on lease from Union Pacific along the Eastern portion of the property along the railroad tracks. These parking spaces are for the sole use of this building. Hopefully all questions concerning Mr. Heriz' use can be answered very quickly by this application and the Baum's and Mr. Heriz can start a great rental relationship. Please el �ree to call me with any questions that you may have concerning this application. r�a�Gicl A'! Marino Real Estate Broker Real Property Sales, Inc. RECEIV�� uN z 7 z000 CITY OF BUR1.ffVGA!v1��. PLANNING f��"' 0 ta�, GITT o� BURLINGAME ��'L., The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to propejty or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, sc�'ety, general welfare, or convenience. �a �� o r�-�� tiy, Gty►,� St�/� Lm T4 �hr.,� w��,►� �� . �e,rt .- l��S . I`�e �a r.n.�»^-- i S /1�� I •�r,�r.,� ,c.� /2�� 5, hD 1MG��fII.0 �w�n( 6+� /ti� 9�S/�P u 2. Hoiv ivill the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance wiih the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? L — Z/�4 ��'� h�s / S � n�� /�Cfti� l vS2. �� 0 �t'1 l�+�( /�%+�- 7'� �im �1 nvL � '�1 � �� n�i �7 ��"'w' `, �`�' ''� / Z3 � f�� 4�� J /��,,-1,,�,,� % 3. How tivill the proposed project be compatible ivith the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? j�i( v��i jr. �� , l�n� �'��i �� l � .�� k; l n�c � f�„� „� y,� t�r�S RECEIVED JUN 2 7 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. cup.frm/11 /98 1. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimenial or injurious to properly or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. How will the proposed st�ucture or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those propertiesl If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the publics's health, safety or general welfare7 Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and thing which have the potential to affect public health (i.e. underground storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Pub/ic safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protectionl Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installedl Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork; engine removal). General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and developmentl Is there a social benefit7 • � Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sitesll Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicappedl 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with tlae Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? , Ask the Planning Department for the general plan designation and zoning district for the proposed project site. Also ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" accordingly. 3. How will tlze � proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and characier of the existing and potential uses o�a adjoining properties iri the general vicinily? . How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhoodl If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood7 If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulkl If there �is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodl Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this usel If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will �the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinityl Compare your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. cup. frm/11 /98 4f� IT1�\ DURlJN4AMf COn��RCIAL APPLICA�'IONS �`�e..... __. • I � !'- ."`. -� PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPL�MENTAL FORM� :� ��E� �;�� 1. Proposed use of the site. ��G � J ��'�"�t�l �'�'il-"S 2. � Days and hours of operation. � c�4 y S , /D a, �► . -- / v, m . Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type). n T�''G � N 7�100��0 �:LI;;(�.; 1N A FN6uDt¢ �7:,�r, �,: < LANNING pr_p f. . :� 4. Cunent and projected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays 2 � ,� / Full-time li Part-time i� 1� � Weekends � � v Full-time Part-time � � 5. Current and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays -- - = � - � _ - � Weekends , � � � � . , � . - � - � 6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner, employees and visitors/customers): 2` y 7. Where do/will the owner & employees park? 2`'^� ��' ' 8. Where do/will customers/visitors park? r'"�'` � s�''�� '" � '� /3/�� 9. Present or most recent use of site. 'J�"'� ��r� �k S ��° �"°�'"p�� rl� 10. List of other tenants on property, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach list if necessary). � �� /S T" iI'S` %S�� 't�io �o �w r►�v�e�i � t' �"'.7./°yrts � � �� , ROUTING FORM DATE: June 28, 2000 TO: X CITY ENGINEER X CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL X rIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for Conditional Use Permit for retail oriental rug sales in a C-2 Subarea D(auto row) building at 218 California Drive, zoned C-2 � Subarea D, APN: 029-213-020. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: to be determined STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 (10:30 a.m.) THANKS, Maureen/Janice/Ruben No co��.� p3o �a Date of Comments ROUTING FORM DATE: June 28, 2000 TO: X CITY ENGINEER X CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL X FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for Conditional Use Permit for retail oriental rug sales in a C-2 Subarea D(auto row) building at 218 California Drive, zoned C-2 � Subarea D, APN: 029-213-020. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: to be determined STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 (10:30 a.m.) THANKS, Maureen/Janice/Ruben S� Date of Comments D �� I � � �� ROUTING FORM DATE: June 28, 2000 TO: X CITY ENGINEER � CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL X FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for Conditional Use Permit for retail oriental rug sales in a C-2 Subarea D(auto row) building at 218 California Drive, zoned C-2 Subarea D, APN: 029-213-020. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: to be determined STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 (10:30 a.m.) THANKS, Maureen/Janice/Ruben � 3 Q � Date of Comments N O C c vv� ►�'�'1 l f �� 32- � � q\ \ � Q � � � > � \ � / QD � . � � N ��- r n� .�o r �^' `' l� ��, KtCEIVED JUN 2 7 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. �R��M'� CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-3997 �� :,,�-,J (650) 558-7250 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 218 CALIFORNIA DRIVE APN: 029-213-030 ACTION ON AN APPLICATION FOR CONDlT10NAL USE PERMIT FOR A RETAIL USE (RUG SALES) 1N AUTO ROW, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA D. The City ofBurlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mond:�y, August 28, 2000, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearin�, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Margaret Monroe City Planner Mailed Au�ust 18. 2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a conditional use permit for retail ru� sales on auto row at 218 California Drive zoned C-2 Subarea D Isaac and Evelvn Baumelgruen property owners APN• 029-213-030; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on August 28. 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the cnvirorunent, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 - existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances is hereby approved. 2. Said conditional use permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Keighran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of August , 2000 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval categorical exemption and conditional use permit 218 California Drive effective September 5, 2000 1. that the tenant space shall be operated as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped June 27, 2000, and access to the shared bathroom facilities shall be maintained; 2. that the business shall not be open for business except during the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m, seven days a week, and if the number of customers exceeds 20 per day, this perinit shall be reviewed; 3. that if property owner loses the lease to the supplemental parking provided on the Caltrain right-of-way, he shall inform the City of the change and the conditional use permit for the non-auto related use shall be subject to review; 4. that the area leased for parking from Caltrain shall be posted for the use of employees and customers of tenants of this site and parking usage shall be enforced by the property owner; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. 2 3 -�--- �, — :�. �� b ' . r„� _ , �= — _.., � � .._ . _ . i . -.,. --I :�� _ � r -�� „ _ � ,.� ��,�,, � � ' . _ - � :r �. „- , � �� , � �=� i� - -t ' r i- +� .,— ;�, ,� ,, C ��F _ '.�-� � .._ �". � .� � / 1 ; � � . � � r . �� ' � �- �� P r �� , . � !� .r ' � ' ;� � - � � �, AS �c _ ,��r„�-� � A _�. . = * ¢„ . �.. ,�►T (� '" S�P, �� •,M J �. ' `- ^ � / � a � � R � �, , p� � * � , _ �: � �� - f , ��-- � �� ^ S-� �.�, � ;, - � .i ..�_�� '� . �i/ •' yp a,��Q. - � .��- ,. ¢ z�� S�b _ � : � �; �� --� ; y� � . :, � OR�J� =e .:�"' yo0 � � 4 . • �� ! � �« � • - ..r�� . . � ' `J � •* f 2 � a/ � 2� $ s � , O �L,lJ ` � :�1 ,� , � l � � � r ' ' -� � `� a� ' N 23 0 27_.� 2z1.. � AV\ �� + � � 4, � .. -'� r � _ �/ . —�.�-_'_ r - �� C-2 ----- E-�'1[;� H 1�41�1 P ""' �' Ad 6i�1 ��.. ��..r' � � r �• � � .�. � .,.� �. �. ' -� � .__ -- �, C - ( � - - - - - -- --� i z41 L31 215 �3 # . " z5� y11 �� ,�z33 . � � � � ; �� - 'Lbt LSS . e � u J i I �•"� --_f._. 8 .�' t '� �1 � M�1 � :' . I � ,� ' y � • � �, r ..�..� y - �' I .w � - �"., �p _ . � - � �: � .�� . ► ,�, " � � s � ` � � ! �� _... , � � � *� � 4,. r '� � � 3 ^�� r� - � a � O , �* �� . � ; I "� �G�. , _ � � � ,� � . � ,�' �Ot,rCGl. A . -:;� * 5 � .<�.. �:,, � " �": , a � i I � � � , ' �'` --� .� � LoR tJ � � J6ti{J� .!* T � � �� . � - �'' , � � _ � _ _ � ��„ ' � � .. . _ - .... . � : � .�..- � - � � � I � r l � � � ,,.�, ` .r I � � I .