The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About229 Bloomfield Road - Staff Report (2)Item No. 7a Regular Action Item .� � �� ' ^ �� .�; r�, . �,�,. �*. �:�: � . .�� :�,�p'�4' �� . r.iH Y , �� $ t: �. �,-, �� r � ��'� �. �;.,�,.a \IL .�y .�e � � <., ... � � � .. � � �; ��` E � �� .�,�� , � � � � e�' �. �.� � � . �e.��"�� "� sbs ,u�.�a�x� a � � ��°^ � � �. � ��, � � ..: �� *' ,"� �' * �3� , ��. �' t F � 4 '� }4 � . � w4.' � } ?., � �.r n��«�s � s � . • F� ��l � `fi C— b 4� �j Y yb• +� `�Syt . � r �� _ r ; �.;� �n . ,� �..�.�. �.. t�' �,,�-�.. -,� , . =r i: �, r: ' , 3t � �_Y �� , �„�' x i�: ; � 5"�# � � >Y'J '.�M:^ }^S ` � . +�«�,� ,..� r >�,_ . . se.,, r c ..� _... .. . � ; ��. : � �.,, :u.� � t"� ' _�� : ' _� -�. '.� ; ,.� � "��. �� t - - -- �, � m 7 �� j � � ,n� . . q'V ;ytY :�.� � ...._. ._ �� '�� j � , � , �:� x � �„ •: +s �a. $ � "'{p :: R2'S°"G� xRM1 �..s,i . . �;.� , � r , sz��,.�„ .',�'^�,��. • � .' ws ��: � ��, , � �. �� "::� ,��:, � �: a'� �� :., ��9 _ ri� • t�,nq� . ��:'�"� i' `b„q� �*� , � �'1�r'ar �' 4,y,: ,:. .�t"-`°:� �.. .. . . � , t } S = 3 �.E�� g� � x � ^ �v . _ �F' �a�' A �� +�A,C : `� �'"k} q A . * 4 � �� H.^n"�K � ✓Ir R uY. 3b � S 't ,. q"Z . � � � 4��C'.w. ,�4" � s � � "�-�-m*—�.�, � �� . � R � � � �`�� , „ ' .. ��i a ° �'~ ,.;�.c�".�:�. :'�S�l4o .n`=;�9mk ". ti,��,.,.�.�,�:wa�..,... ,.....w PROJECT LOCATION 229 Bloomfield Road City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 229 Bloomfield Road Item No. 7a Regular Action Item Meeting Date: October 9, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Dale Meyer, Dale Meyer and Associates APN: 029-252-080 Property Owners: Rob and Kristin Flenniken Lot Area: 7,500 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The existing two-story house with an attached one car garage contains 2,905 SF (0.38 FAR) of floor area. The proposed project includes a first and second story addition which would increase the floor area to 3,448 SF (0.45 FAR) where 3,500 SF (0.46 FAR) is the maximum allowed as perthe Zoning Code. The proposed project is 52 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The existing house contains four bedrooms and with the proposed project the number of bedrooms wouldn't change. For a four-bedroom house, two parking spaces are required, one of which must be covered. The existing one-car garage would maintain a 12'-2'h" X 20'-11" clear area, where 9'-0" x 18'-0" is allowed for an existing one car garage. One uncovered parking space (9'-0" x 20'-0") is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant requests the following application: � Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling (CS 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 229 B/oomfield Road Lot Size: 7,500 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 6 and Se tember 26, 2018 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS __ _ _...... : _._.. _ _. Front (15t flr): 21'-4'/z" No change 15'-0" (or block average) /2nd f�r�: 23'-4'/2" No change 20'-0" (or block average) � _..... __ _.__. _ _.... . ___.. __ ._ ..._._. _ _._ . _ _.. _ _.. . ..... Side (left): 5'-3" No change 4'-0" (right): 4'-0" No change 4'-0" _.._ _ ___ ___.. _, _ _.. _ .._.._.... Rear (15t flr): 69'-2 '/2 "(up to fireplace) No change 15'-0" �2nd flr): 91'-0 '/z" 72'-0" 20'-0" _ _.. _....... . . ............. , _. _._._ __ Lot Coverage: 2,113 SF � 2,408 SF 3,000 SF 28% j 32% 40% _ _. _ _ _... _ _._ ........ . _... _._ _.._ ...... FAR: 2,905 SF ' 3,448 SF 3,500 SF' 0.38 FAR 0.45 FAR 0.46 FAR '(0.32 x 7,500 SF) + 1100 SF = 3,500 SF (0.46 FAR) Design Review 229 Bloomfield Road 229 Bloomfield Road Lot Size: 7,500 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 6 and Se tember 26, 2018 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D # of bedrooms: 4 4 --- __...... _.. _... : _ _ � ___ __ 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered Off-Street Parking: (14'-0'/z" X 20'-11") (12'-2'/z" X 20'-11") (9'X18' for existing) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered _ �s°-o° x 20�-0„) . (9°-0" x zo�-o°) � _ _. _. (s�xzo') __ __ Height: 26'-0" 26'-0" 30'-0" _._. _.. _ __ .... . .. ...... . __ __ ._.... _.. . DH Enve/ope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 Staff Comments: None Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on September 24, 2018, the Commission was overall satisfied with the design of the project and voted to place this item on the Consent Calendar (see attached September 24, 2018, Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission noted a drafting error on the front elevation and asked the applicant to submit the correct elevation. The applicant submitted a response letter and revised sheet, P4, dated September 26, 2018. The front elevation was revised to show the correct existing roof profile on the second floor roof. There were no other changes to the plans. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: The subject property is a located on an interior lot and the proposed second story addition is at the rear of the property, which is not visible from the street. The project maintains the existing Mediterranean architectural style of the house by using similar materials as the existing house, which includes clay roof tiles and stucco siding. The proposed addition interfaces well with the adjacent properties and for these reasons the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions of approval should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the revised plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 6 and September 26, 2018, sheets A1 through L2.1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or � Design Review 229 B/oomfie/d Road pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 3 Design Review Sonal Aggarwal Contract Planner c. Dale Meyer, applicant and designer Rob and Kristin Flenniken, property owners Attachments: September 24, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Response Letter from Applicant, received September 26, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 28, 2018 Area Map 229 Bloomfield Road 4 ITY ��;:�j ;� �, i ��i-- ,� � e ti�o _ go 'OPORwTP City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, September 24, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers a. 229 Bloomfield Road, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second-story addition to a single-family dwelling. (Dale Meyer Associates, Dale Meyer, applicant and designer; Rob and Kristin Flenniken, property owners) (135 noticed) Staff contact: Sonal Aggarwal All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an oveiview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer, project designer, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Appears that there is an error on the Front Elevation, existing upper roof should exfend to the edge of existing second floor window. (Meyer: �ll review and correct plans.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Nice, straight forward project. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Chair Gaul, to place the item on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, and Tse Absent: 1 - Terrones City of Burlingame page 1 Printed on 10/2/2018 DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES ARCH ITECTURE-INTERIORS-PLANN ING 100 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 201 BURLINGAME, CA 94010-5280 650-348-5054 September 26, 2018 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING D[VISION 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 RE: 229 BLOOMFIELD ROAD, BURLINGAME — DESIGN REVIEW This letter is in response to the comments at the study session on Monday, September 24, 2018 for the above referenced project. Please find the following attachments: revised front elevation. The roof on the front elevation has been corrected per comments from the commissioners. Please call me if there are any questions. Sincerely, � ��'� ,; Dale Meyer, AIA/Ik Attachments �L�� V �V SEN � o �;.;.:� CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PIANNING Dli/. �y�� r'"� 1 RIIHL IM1f:I�M[ r � — � � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION► Typ� of application: I$ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: �L�'I - 2`� Z� �'',�L ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: ��-� �I o�w��I� {�� APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: `�%G(.� N�+�X� ��.�GiGi�� Name: �o�O �C K�� V1 ��,�nf�l Address: f�p� �i ��'� (/1� �� E. 1� I Address: �2`'� �d�v��l �G� City/State/Zip: �JItiY�I�� n�aw� � ��-�'( � -c��' City/State/Zip: �J��1�IG1,wr�C� G�� o r (D 5�—�-2( — � Phone: � ��' ��' �� ✓`�"� Phone: 50 � n I�- r( e.�,.c�. �� 5 W�, �c�-�Yl E-mail: �� t'�'��I�'% L G��UGG1�,nb� �Vl�i� E-mail: k,t�i�fiv� _�(�v�i��vi ��jw,a.� �.caw� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �-''��.WLFi� �� p�� Address: _ City/State/Zip: Phone: E-mail: Burlingame Business License #: 3�t- �1 �`�: � � ' � . l�.J ' � � �; � '�,�,-. �r-:.. �.. .�g . '' ?_018 , .iNGAME . r . . ._ . . �� :1 �i i� s'.�. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. �(Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: � st '� 2 � `t� '�fi/ '� (��1.G�,l��h �- A�1,��'�I/ G�Lfi�i�-. � aa'W1.� i1 `In>vY �-r r}-��, Y, �'7�,.y'i 1�� v�,,v� i�✓L t�('� ,��r�� '✓i r='✓vU v:a-�y) . � AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: L�� ''y��/ Date: `�'.'�-7 � ��''� I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ^ / Property owner's signature: � Date: � z� � `�li� ��i-- ' {- y L`' Date submitt d: 5; I-D �!��. e S: �HANDOUTSI PCApplication.doc � -� �s� �-� .�..; a bY : (�b� �� I�. n �„� ke.--, RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existina sinale familv dwellina at 229 Bloomfield Road zoned R-1 Rob and Kristin Flenniken propertv owners, APN: 029-252-080; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 9, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dav of October 2018 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Categorical Exemption and Design Review 229 Bloomfield Road Effective October 19, 2018 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the revised plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 6 and September 26, 2018, sheets A1 through L2.1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME '� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '°i� ��' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 229 BLOOMFIELD ROAD The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second-story addition to a single-family dwelling at 229 BLOOMFIELD ROAD zoned R-l. APN 029-252-080 Mailed: September 28, 2018 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlinqame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ("Please refer to other sid?) 229 Bloomfield Rd. 300' Radius APN 029.252.080 o� �° - � �� -D �n �� v ,,�D � aJ9 w 9Ga � Q �, D J33� �Qw �� ' n �? J. `?U '3C C',p ^v� r�� '� , � �� u �� ' � n� oa � � a 4 °U � '� � q� � °� a� D � a �J� �r,�, �'r � O� � �n� � �ry`� rU� � nu � r7� U cu� E�; sJ C� D� O � � �� p �� r �-v J� �� p�� r�� EYG,� LU � � �� 1^i 4 t�.�� 4�� r � +:� J �`jp � pa � .� � p� �n �� c�F �n �,y �q� ��n � ��7� � p � W :7 i7 U'�,, �r' p O V 3 %J O ,,�. ,a t� U � d �7 O �p �; �y Q7 O� t;� 4� �� a a �' � 1� U£' � � � � QD. � i� (� `��? � b�c `�") 'i! � `1!� ^ 41,Q ''� � �Fi 4 ' vn fi., � �. 4 �'. � J �� `n �c v � a� � q q° �'� `�d d v �� t� ��J 9 v �� '� ,� '� ° �q� , c � �, ' a w � ,,� '6 ' �� Q'' � �� p 1� ,i , q,`3� f M1 �� D ; A ;4 .. . �aJ ��d �� a .� 9 F, qb� �y b ^ �4 '`/� t V. .a ' �^:l .� � � �!] � � +"� s , ` t W � � �� Q � O' w�° � ^ ac �Y j Q ��i QY �: d �o � qQ r �� , . � ao G,,�� • r/ +�� ' q�� G e'° " �, � �j� 4 �W� G�r7 . ° :�JQ � � c+° Js� b`� � a� q �� _ '` �' . � 4�� 9 �y�a � . ~ . .+o _ .. � r"'V� .. •s� �c Q r��' e`y t? .� � � {y �'� ,. �� n, e�o p ��Q p � �bQ � [ �' ,�,,. �D D � � � �� 9�� ' 4 ' � a � �,.4�' • � - � � � City of Burlingame Planning Division (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments Project Address: 229 Bloomfield Road Description: Design Review for first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling Date of Plans: August 20, 2018 Letter Date: August 29, 2018 Lot Area: 7,500 SF Zoning: R-1 Please address all items marked with a"► " svmbol. 1. Design Review (Code Section 25.26.040 and 25.57.010) • The proposed first and second story addition is subject to Design Review. Application has been submitted. ► Please revise the profile of the addition on the existing elevations. 2. Setbacks (Code Section 25.26.072) Existing Front (1S' Floor): ' (2nd Floo�): ; _ Side (left): '. (right): ; 21'-4 '/z„ 23'-4 '/z" _ 5'-3" 4'-0" Rear (1St Floor): ; 69'-2'/z "(up to fireplace) �2nd FI0o�1� g� ....p'�z » . _..._. • The project complies with setback regulations No response required 3. Lot Coverage (Code Section 25.26.065) 40% x 7,500 SF = 3,000 SF inaximum allowed , ................................................................... .. _........................................................................... ................ _........_...._........__.. __ .. .... i Existing Lot Coverage: ' 2,113 28% • The project complies with lot coverage regulations No response required Proposed _ ___..__ ................. .................___......... ................... . ............. 21'-4'/z" (no change) 23'-4'/z" (no change) __ 5'-3" 4'-0" (no change) Allowed/Required _......_......_ ..............._................. _ _........ 15'-0" or block average ' 20'-0" or block average _...__ _.....___ 4-0" 4-0" 69'-2'/z " (up to fireplace) 72'-0° 1 Proposed 2,408 32% 15'-0" 20'-0" Allowed/Required 3,000 SF 40% City of Burlingame Planning Division (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 4. Floor Area Ratio (Code Section 25.26.070) x 7,500 SF) + 1100 SF = 3500 SF inaximum allowed Existing Floor Area Ratio: : 2,905 ' 0.38 FAR F Proposed Allowed/Required _ _...... :..... ... _..... _ _ _ _ 3,448 SF 0.45 FAR 3,500 0.46 FAR • The project complies with floor area regulations No response required 5. Building Height (Code Section 25.26.060) Average top of curb: (101.35' + 100.98')/2 = 101.17' Existing: 101.17' + 25.50' = 126.67' (25'-6" above average top of curb) Proposed: 101.17' +25.50' = 126.67' (25'-6" above average top of curb) Allowed: 101.17' + 30.00' = 131.17' (30'-0" above average top of curb) ► As asked previously, show the height up to the top of the roof ridge from average top of the curb for the new addition and revise the marking for the new ridge (4'-2'h") which is marked incorrectly. ► The top of the roof ridge scales as 26'-0" on the rear elevation, which is noted as 25'-6. Please revise the drawing. 6. Declining Height Envelope (DHE) (Code Section 25.26.075) Points of Departure - Left Side: (101.47' + 103.93')/2 = 102.70' - Right Side: (100.95' + 103.30')/2 = 102.12' • The project complies with declining height envelope regulations No response required 7. Off-Street Parking (Code Section 25.70.030) The existing garage front setback is 23'-4 %" and is non-conforming Existing: 1 covered (14'-0'/z" X 20'-11") + 1 uncovered (9' X 20') Proposed: 1 covered (12'-2 'h" X 20'-11 ") + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Required: 1 covered (9' x 18' for existing) + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') • The project complies with off-street parking regulations No response required � City of Burlingame Planning Division (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 8. Accessory Structure (Code Section 25.60.010) Existing shed (74.8 SF) removed in the construction. No response required 9. Landscaping (Code Section 11.06.090) No response required End of Comments Please contact Sonal Aggarwal if you have questions regarding these plan check comments: saqqarwal(a�m-qrouq.us or (408) 340 5642 ext 114.