HomeMy WebLinkAbout1544 Bernal Avenue - Staff Reporti ``� 1 S h ��N
�r � �1 1 �'� ...
... �w ��`�y . ��{-/ .
��` �� c T � .,\ .
. �' # i ' , +� �
������- ��� '.'
n �4. �`,'y `� �� ,,L `�
� �� :
` V `� ;. �. , + A� � w
i�..t ��� �� � .
', ��� ��
�` Y �*�' '' • �•
.f. ��_ '�j '- (,�
Y"•:. � �.�•d
� s ��_��
.• 1��'� �h
� \ �.«
��' . �.���
� J'� . '1• `� ~ � ���\ 'i
n
;:��... _'y,tt': .� 'i
rK-
.'.
� : } *R•T,4; r
r ��
- Y i
N��+, I
,�' ;�
��� `�'.�
� '�,�K'� 3,}
}, �1
�V . _�
.�G Ry� �T." �7". �.
�'�:i�e•j� i�
�.��. .J, r . � '
� °� � -�� v
.�-.
.�1 ? � � Kf
^�`.i�
, , � , z�
�( V{�.
4.. ' �'Int �, .
{ i'! '2� �i',� � i T' • R• , i�
'� !4�#.�� 'i_''y `�.�: !
.� � i . !a?. ,`�
� '_`.�. + ' ' , . �:
. � — �y,i�/.�:'R u- • .
� ^ r��. •t'+�''}�y�'+7�� � .
. � t �. y+� ; • p . �i���'�juy�'��'.•c�.��"�R�i,
^'*'_7
���� .
�� ;� .��:;�� .r
. � �{'��}� t �•*,`
i;. .y�. f �Ci ...
,��� ��.. �j .ti�` � �_ .
,
, ,...�.-_
� �;,,�t�. ,�.,�, �;� ,�,.��� ; f� � •
� � `• �'� ►'�� ���h/Ur�V� ,n
, . .�-, t`.vZ�.. •� .� . �,�� ,y? �.� ���,
;jr . :' ~y� ' �` � t1t j11, '��
�,•..�:� ,iS�'• , ; �[���� :"�I� ��r�, ~
,;��y'.,•, � .. �y � � ' .. ". � �"���` ��� �'- �
-i. ��_ .
__ f �
�
Item #
Consent Calendar
City of Burlingame
Parcel Map for Lot Line Adjustfner:t; 1544 Bernal Avenue Desigr: Review for a New, Two-Story
Dwelliizg wit/i a Detaclted Garage
Address: 1544 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 02/24/03
Request: Parcel map for lot line adjustment; Design review and for a new, single-family dwelling
with detached garage(C.S. 25.57.010).
Applicant and Designer: James Chu, Chu Design 1544 Bernal Ave. APN: 026-033-230
Property Owner: Denise Laugesen Balestrieri Lot Area: 6,840 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential 1550 Bernal Ave. APN: 025-213-080
Zoning: R-1 Lot Area: 10,200 SF
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a
limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a
second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences
maybe constructed or converted under this exemption.
Summary:
Parcel Map for Lot Line Adjustment
(Please refer to attached Public Works Memo dated January 29, 2003). The site on Bernal Avenue
consists of two parcels. The eastern parcel (1544 Bernal) has 75 feet of frontage on Bernal Avenue and
is 9,000 SF. The western parcel has 65.47 feet of frontage on Bernal Avenue and is 8,040 SF. Mills
Creek runs along the left side of the western parcel. The two parcels are not merged by any residential
structures or related parking uses and are independently buildable lots. The western parcel was created
in 1960 when the rear portions of 1556 Bernal Avenue and 1925 Devereux Drive were divided off to
create a 8,040 SF parcel that fronted on Bernal Avenue. Since its creation the western parcel has been
owned by the property owner at 1544 Bernal Avenue.
Staff would note that there is a discrepancy in way the western property was recorded when it was
created in 1960 by San Mateo County and by the City of Burlingame. San Mateo County recorded the
property as two separate parcels, a northern parcel that was divided from 1925 Devereux Drive and a
southern parcel that was divided fram 1556 Bernal Avenue. The City of Burlingame, however,
recorded the two lot segments as a single parcel. The site plan on Sheet A.2, submitted by the
applicant, shows a lot line bisecting the western parcel, but in fact the City of Burlingame recognizes
this property as a single parcel or lot.
There is an existing two-story, single-family dwelling on the parcel at 1544 Bernal Avenue. There is a
10-foot public utility easement running from north to south along the property line dividing the two
parcels, but the easement is located entirely on the western parcel. The easement is currently used for
aboveground PG&E poles. There is a pole located halfway down the existing easement that supplies
power to 1544 Bernal Avenue and to the two properties across the creek at 1556 Bernal Avenue and
1925 Devereux Drive.
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing house at 1544 Bernal Avenue, to move the existing
boundary line between the two parcels 25 feet to the east, and to abandon the existing 10-foot public
Parcel Mup for Lot Lir:e Ar� i�shnent; 1544 Bernal Avenue Design Review for a New, 1544 Beriial Averaue
Tx�o-Ston� Dwelli�rg til�ith a Detac/�erl Carage.
utility easement and establish a new 10-foot easement that straddles the new property line so 5-feet of
the easement is on each parcel. This would create a 10,200 SF lot at 1550 Bernal Avenue and a 6,840
SF lot at 1544 Bernal Avenue. The result of the shift of the property line would be to make the
property at 1550 Bernal developable, with 60% of the lot area as buildable land outside of the creek.
Otherwise this lot would not meet the City's current development requirements.
The proposed eastern parcel at 1544 will 11ave a 50-foot frontage on Bernal Avenue and a 5-foot public
utilities easement running the length of the left side of the property. The proposed western parcel at
1550 Bernal Avenue will have a 90.47-foot frontage on Bernal Avenue and a 5-foot public utilities
easement running the length of the right side of the property. The existing power pole will have to be
re-located to within the boundaries of the new easement. The parcel at 1550 Bernal Avenue will
require a private sewer easement across 1544 Bernal Avenue to connect to the main in the easement
east of that property.
1544 Bernal Avenue
The applicant is proposing a new, two-story, single-family dwelling with a detached garage at 1544
Bernal Avenue. The proposed floor area on the parcel will be 3,522 SF (0.51 FAR) where 3,689 SF
(0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed. There are 5 bedrooms in the proposed dwelling and the proposed
2-car detaclled garage meets the code requirements for covered parking spaces on the site. All other
zoning code requirements have been �net.
The applicant is requesting the following:
• Parcel map for lot line adjustment to relocate an existing public utility easement and to move an
existing property line and create a developable creek side lot; and
• Design Review for one new, two-story single-family dwelling with detached garage at 1544 Bernal
Avenue.
1544 BERNAL AVENUE
PROPOSED 1544 EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS
Front (Ist flr): 21'-6" 30'-0" 21'-6" is block avg.
(2nd Jlr): 31'-6" 68'-6" 21'-6"
Side (left): 6'-0" 10'-6" 6'-0"
(riglzt): 12'-0" 42'-0" 6'-0"
2
Parcel Mrrp for Lot Line Adjustnaent; /544 Ber��arrl Avenue Design Revietiv for a New, 1544 Bernal Avenue
Two-Story Dit�ellirt u�ith a Detached Gnrn e.
PROPOSED 1544 EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D
Rear (1 st flr): 24'-0" 33'-0" 15'-0"
(2i:d flr): 33'-0" 33'-0" 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 2,440 SF 1,769 SF 2,736 SF
36% 20% 40%
(lot size was 2,160 SF
larger than proposed lot)
FAR: 3,522 SF not known- 3,689 SF
0.51 FAR two- story dwelling 0.54 FAR
Parkii:g: 2 covered detached garage --- 2 covered
(10' x 20') (10' x 20')
1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') (9' x 20')
# of bedroo�ns: 5 --- ---
Height: 24'-3" --- 30'-0"
DH Envelope: complies --- see code
Staff Comments: See attached. Planning staff would note that at the February 10, 2003 design review
study meeting, the applicant withdrew the dwelling at 1550 Bernal Avenue from the application. At
this time, the Commission is only taking action on the parcel map and the dwelling on the new lot
created at 1544 Bert�al Avenue.
Planning staff would also note that the applicant proposes to remove two protected-size Eucalyptus
trees on the parcel for 1550 Bernal Avenue that are located outside the footprint of the proposed
dwelling. These two trees will require a Tree Removal permit from the Parks and Recreation
Department which must be applied for and approved Uefore a building permit is issued, or the project
will need to be re-designed to preserve the trees. A Certified Arborist report submitted by the applicant
and date stamped February 13, 2003, finds that in addition to the two Eucalyptus trees the applicant
proposes to remove, there are three other protected size trees on the site, including two Coast Live
Oaks next to the creek at 1550 Bernal Avenue and a Magnolia in the front yard of 1544 Bernal Avenue.
Conditions for approval numbered 15 and 16 address the protection and post-construction maintenance
of these trees.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on
February 10, 2003, the Commission moved to place this item on the consent calendar, with the
followin� direction given to the applicant (February 10, 2003, Planning Commission Minutes):
3
Parccl Map for Lot Gr�ne Adjustntent; 1544 Bernal ,Avefi:se Design Review fo�• a New, 1544 Berrinl A��e�aue
Two-Sto�y Du�elling tit�ith n Detached Curcage.
• chimney is drawn incorrectly on the front elevation;
• investigate a steeper roof pitch, perhaps a 6:12 pitch; this house is teetering between a
shingle and a Craftsman design and a steeper roof might be more appropriate;
• the columns at the entry porch just die into the eave, design could be improved by adding a
beam at the top;
• what material will be used for the roof over the curved element at the rear; comp will work,
but you have the option of copper, which could really add something special; and
• would like to see a Certified Arborist report to address tree protection measures on the site.
The applicant submitted revised plans and a Certified Arborist Report (see attached), date stamped
February 13, 2003, in response the Commission's suggestions. Revisions to the plans include:
� chimney has been revised on the front elevation;
• tl�e roof pitch has been changed from 5:12 to 7:12; and
• the columns at the entry porch have been revised from two single floor to ceiling columns to
two double columns on a stone pedestal, and a wood trim detail has been added below the
roof line.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted
by the Council on A�ril 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's February
10, 2003, design review study meeting, that the Craftsman design of the proposed dwelling fits in with
the existing houses in the neighborhood, that the design of the house follows the shape of the lot and
reduces the mass, that the side setbacks have been increased so that the house will not have a
detrimental impact on the neighboring properties, and that the lot line adjustment will provide
buildable land for the lot adjacent to the creek, the project is found to be compatible with the
requirements of the City's five design review guidelines and the parcel map is recommended to the
City Council for action.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirnlative
action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review and the reasons for any
0
Parcel Mcip.for Lot Line A�Ijustrnent; 1544 Bernal Avenue Design Review for a New, /544 Be��nal Avenue
Two-Sto�y Dwelling ti+�ith n Detached Carage.
action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped February 13, 2003, sheets A.1 through A.6 and sheet L1, and that any changes to
building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed
professional sllall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as
window ]ocations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed
professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
certification under penalty of perjury;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
6. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and the Fire MarshaPs November 25, 2003, memos,
and the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2003memo shall be met;
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;
9. that prior to schedulin� the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners and set the building envelope;
10. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the
new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
11. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Parcel Map for Lot Line Arfjustrnent,- 1544 Bernnl Avenue Design Review for• a New, 1544 Bernal Avenue
Titi�o-Stoi�� Dx�ellir:g with a Detached Garage.
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of stornz
water runoff;
12. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete
Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at
time of permit application;
13. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
14. that prior to sclleduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of t11at height;
15. that the tree protection measures detailed in the February 13, 2003, Certified Arborist Report
shall be established prior to construction and maintained throughout construction by the
certified arborist and be inspected by the City Arborist before a demolition permit is issued by
the Building Department for the existing single-family residence and/or accessory structures;
16. the propei-ty owner shall be responsible for submitting a certified arborist's report for approval
by the City Arborist before a final Building permit is issued to address a recommended
maintenance program for the three protected-size trees on site (the two Coast live Oaks next to
the creek bank and the Magnolia in the front yard of 1544 Bernal Avenue) for at least three
years following construction; failure to do this resulting in the loss of the protected trees shall
require that the property owner replace the lost trees with trees of a size and species selected by
the City Arborist; and
16. that before a demolition pernlit is issued Building Department for the existing single-family
residence and/or accessory structures, the applicant shall apply for and be issued a Tree
Removal pennit fi-oin the Parks and Recreation Department for the two Eucalyptus trees on site
that will be removed.
Erika Lewit
Planner
c: Denise Laugesen Balestrieri
6
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790
��� CITY O�
BURLNGAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
��.,.o
Type of application
Design Review � Conditional Use Permit Variance
Special Permit Other Parcel Number:
Project address: I'J� I ��� �•�`��
APPLIC T ` ��
t��I i�
Name:
Name:
Address:'�"� �' ��.>� ��� Address: g E 1�✓ ��C�
City/State/Zip: c�!-1`� ��i ��2' City/State/Zip:
Phone (w):_� I I� 4 2 �� Phone (w):
(h):
(h):
(�: 558- O�'�'� c�:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
Name: G 1 U�I�I" ���� � � I�•
Address: �� W� �� �``vL Please indicate with an asterisk *
�y� j� e contact pers��o,� �}� p��ct.
City/State/Zip:� 1- I�'�. � ��r��j (�� � �J
Phone (w): 3�' I ��
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE :
given herein is true and co�-rec�
Applicant's
I know about the propose�
application to the Planning
Property owner's signature:
PERTY OWNER
Date: I 2� ��
and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
Nov 2 z zoo2
under penalty of perjury that the information
k;�iowledee and belief.
Date: � I � �
PCAPP.FRM
(h): ���� i Y �F �uK��rvuar�t
3�Id� q,� PLANNING UEPT.
(fl: � C�
ROUTING FORM
DATE: November 25, 2002
TO: _Ciry Engineer
Chief Building Official
�Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_Ciry Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story, single family dwelling with detached garage
at 1544 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-230.
0
ROUTING FORM
DATE: November 25, 2002
TO: _City Engineer
_Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
�Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story, single family dwelling with detached garage
at 1544 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-230.
c�m�r.r. r►r.�nr.i�i �,r i w1 i �� �nn�
J1A1'1' 1\L' V11:VV: LVIV1LUtty� 1VVVCLlLUC1 LJ� LVVL
�',��-- l��e.�,���.�,�,� ��v�- . � �''
✓��
�►�'V'��u. ��r �. �1 t,� ��fl � C�1 t,�='�,C �' c;-�L
�
�=� `�.�,� ��-�.�-.�
�
���' c �.;�� z ���� J /�� ���-t-�-�- ��� `'�
J
�'�%�'� ��= �: �u��t�� I �5S � �a�- v+�-u '� �U---t.��--v'�, .
� �
Reviewed By: � Date of Comments: �2 /�(a l �' �--
ROUTING FORM
DATE: November 25, 2002
TO: �� City Engineer
_Chief Building Offiicial
Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story, single family dwelling with detached garage
at 1544 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-230.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS i� -jwv-��-�wy
Project Name: i� C�. -�w �r�.� u �.,,�;;wr,r.
�
Project Address:_ lS �'Lnrk�-_�✓�
The following requirements apply to the project
1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the
building permit issuance.)
2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit
issuance.)
3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requirements.
5 � A sanitary sewer lateral t�is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.)
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront BikelPedestrian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and i������ ify mitigation measures.
8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project.
9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should
identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map
for reviews.
12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenant work.
15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters �.:� poles,
trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 �/ Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of '�;T� ;ineers
Permits.
19 � No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 Sl The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 •� The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 � The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans
showing the driveway profile with elevations
Page 2 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23 —�— The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
Page 3 of 3
U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc.
F��E �;p �76793
STATE CON iKACTOR S L1C _ � �
ES�f.aIILISHED 1931 • ,
GRAllliAI'E F'ORESTER • CERTIFIEll ARBORI5TS • PEST CONl�R01. AD�'ISORS AND OPERATOR
535 BKAGATO RO.AD, S:�c. A
RSC}{p{� L fIl:NT1'JGTON Sp,�; CAR1.pS. CA 94070-b228
YRF.SIDENT Ortober 4, ZQ�2 TELEPNONE: (65U) 593-4400
hr\'lN R ►�fF�TY FACS{MILE: (650) 593-»4a�
��P:.xATIVN�MA��:�GER EMr�IL: info,iimeyuetree.com
Denise Laugeson
4I4 Costa Rica
San Mateo, CA 94402
Re: 1544 Bernal, Burlingame
Dear Vts. Laugeson:
On September 30, 2002, I inspected the 17 remaining trees on the above referenced site.
There are 4 trees depicted on the site plans which are no longer there. The purpose of
thi5 inspection was to determine general tree health and structure.
The lot wili be divided into two lots and the tree irtformation can be used to place the
proposed new home footprints to favor the more desirable trees. Each tree was assigned a
number which connects this report to site plan numbering. Each tree ��as given a cendition
rating based on the followin� table and is a combination of tree health and structure.
0-29 ... Very poor
30-49 ... Paor
50-69 ... Fair
7Q-89 ...Good
90-1U0 .. Excellent
Finally, comments are given to explain condition rating and other information regarding
site construction. You also wished me to address the matter of tree protection on a
construction site. This is best done by instaliirig fencing at or near the krees driplines ta
enclose as much of the root zone as possible, still allowing for the construction to
proceed. (See "Mitigating Measures for Existing Trees on Construction Sites", enclosed.)
There are only 41ar�e trees which could be at risk af significant construcrion impacts:
trees numbered 2, l4, 16 and 17. Tree number 2 is a borderiine tree and I�To. 14 is a large
eucalyptus.
REC�.IVED
F E B 1 3 2003
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Laugest�n 10-4-�2, Pg• 2
'�lumbers 16 and 17 are large live oaks on the creek bank and are tr�e best tree� on the lot.
l w.,ulci rathtr see trees numbered 2 and i� removed than risk si�,nifieant impacts to the
urtics.
1 t�elieve this report is accurate and based on sound arboricultural principles and
practices. Please contact us if y�u have any questions•
Sincerely,
� ,� � ` J GL.
� J�
�� ��� � �
I
IZichard L. Huntington
Certified Ar�wri�t W'C 0119
RL.H:dcr
Encl.
� , __ �,_
FEB 1 3 ?0`�
ciTY or r�.�,� �.�;�...;�,,,:;_
PLANi�Ilf��G 'JEPT.
I.au�eson 1C1-�-02
TREE SURVEY
T�e !�1�. e ies Size Condition Comments
(Inches) (Percent)
1 Liquidambar 15.2 45 Basal wound, bark canker. Reco�nmend
removal.
2 Magnolia 26.6 @ 3' Tree was topped, with all resulting
growth being sprouts. I�4ost of the
roots are on the surface. iree has a
slight lean and trunk decay.
� , Fig 10.0 25 Topped at 10'. Tree is sunburned.
Severely paor structure. Recommend
. removal
� Coast live oak 9.6 C�' 1' 50 Forks at 18" with included bark.
; Cuast live oak 6.2, �.7 50 Forks at ground level with included
�c� I � bark.
6 Loquat 1�1.3 C� 3' 6a Growing into wires. Forks at 4'.
7 Coast live oak 11 A5 60 �rowing into wires. Most growth an
west side.
S Coast live oak 9.5 55 Growing into wires and fence. Topped
for line clearance.
9 Coast live oak 10.8 60 Growing into wires and fence. Slight
east lean.
li� Coast live a�k 9.0 60 West lean.
11 California pepper 12.0 30 Nearly choked by ivy. Recommend
remova:.
12 Eucalyptus 42 55 3/a of trunk covered with ivy. Recommend
globulus (From site plan) removal.
r--, � � >
I�r�ti..� �_i�
FEB 1 =� ; �,a
CITY Of „t
PLHtvi� ,
1_augesor� 10-4-02
TREE SURVEY
C ondition Comments
'I'ree No. �cies ize I� nf�
(Inches) ( erce
56 b5 3/a of trunk covered with ivy. Slight lean.
13 Eucalytpus
globulus (From site plan)
�, 65 Large trunk . Has westerly lean.
Iq Eucalyptus
globutus (From site plan)
1� Bay
24 �p None.
(From site plan)
16 Coast live oak 48 70 Slight lean. Recently pruned.
(From site plan)
17 Coast live oak 49 70 Slight l�an. Recently pruned.
(From site plan)
��� (�.' ' .�
r �� .��
FI�B 11=�3 % 200 �
C�TYYi-OF: f-;Uf�,LINGA�SL•
PRLjF�I�:MING DEf�T.
�f
I,augrson 10-4�2, Pb. 2
Numbcrs 16 and 17 arc l��rbc livc oiks on the crcck bank and arc thc bc�st tr�cs on th` lot.
I wi�uJd rather see trer.�s numbered 2 and 14 removed than risk.i�Rificaizt impacts lo the
oa ks.
'1 ree pr��tP�tion is easily accomplished by }�laeing construction fencing a� or near d�e
driplines of the trees. The fen�ing cail bc adjusted to illow c��nstruction t� pro�eed. It is
imporf�nt to hav�• as l�r�e � 1re�+ prc�t�•ctipn �.qnc as poss�bl� arn�nd thc trees. 1'��r tr��cs
numbered 16 a»d 17, ,tra�bht fr��ce will profect mureof the root �one frc�m theconstruction
site. Oth�r trees to remain shuuld b� treated thr.� samc.
�'1.
l beiiPVP this report is accur:�r� and based �n .��ind arboricriltur�l principles »nd
practi�es. Pleasc contact us i{ yuu havc any c�uections.
Sincrrcly,
� �
� '
(/�'(r' L' '�
�S�jC �T/ Cf
��,. HUNr, ��
�� ����
� 19 Z �
Np. WC.OI
, � *,
RiChard L. Hunlin�ton
Ccrtificd Arborist WC O1 ly
RLH:dcr
[nc.l.
�—�. - ,
,
� ��� � � L_ � ��,�� � � , ,.
FEB 1 3 2003
CI7Y 0! I>,il;�.i�����;�,�A�
PLHfdIVfNG UEP I -
1 I� � 6� 3 j •�� � a a. v 1 l A.• v v.. v v v 1 I 1 �v v � _ 19 � 3 1 I L l!� L L L �l ! L� 1 J v V �. � �� J L o i P V V V V
L
�
� ta �
�� � � I ��0� �
� ����
� t � 6 � ••• � _�
j ��6� � � � _
! V� �"� r� / ����
1-
1 � J ���•
� ! l�'� ----r �� ' - � .
wa�0�wwe'a l� r- � �..�,.' ��.--�
r � � � � /
J -�� r�
� � � �� v, � / i �.d
� w _ �M+ •. �
� 1� wMw�N � s-4.M��-^/ ' �
,'.,0. �� ����� I _� � f ^ �/ "�� A
� � _ _ .{� � Jf�. Y - iNah7 P ��� � ��/ � . � O �
.� - ��_ ` - I ~ ��'� �' � � � Y �
„ � � � _ E - � L�� 9 �
�j 1 i � , } � � �� � � � � �
Ij � �� � � � �--_� � � �i'�^ �
�' � r _ �--� --� -���� -
_, �
, ., � i , ° --_.____
? �,, ' �-- � -. � �- ~ ��---� . .-
1 � � ^ R �" — — 1 ��-�
� ` r � f �' �'=�r .'_ �� � o �
� . � j :.... � x � � `�
:'i � , — -� � � aa aa � N �' _._.���-�.
-- - �_ '�:. � ,
�' ' • . .'rJ f �• � . � `~~ �
�a�d' . .; �'_;r•„���=-r- :�.x'=r�l l . �.
,_ _.. � ,
' �. a II � ,�� E• �� �
� . � + ' �, � � `
``�" � ' ' " c G�
'� ` � � 4 I 'I
� . �. _,^._ ,� =-�� � � � �
� � r'. ,.',: : '• ou a..a
�- � � cc�:.� . �� ��, � �
f- 1 •.�- � "'" ',OJ I
' m �; �+ -- ---- --- -' �.�; •-.• i
� �M��f�� I ^ : .� I
, r' `` � �"� . . ; � x (
�_ �'�� � , � , � � � p� �I
- � L._ I �'.' �
e �: �� .�'� � ^ � 1
� �� � � .�� �� ��\ I
� \� , � _T ,_ _ � __ � �_ �!•
' K '� �__�V�Ji�� _ . ., '- - _ - J � y �
� � -1 ' _ �'l' , Jw-��! � l �q�� - "'�� ' b i
.,r "� V - _ � � � —�p ;;� ���' � �'�^ ~ � e J` � D �
� � ' __------t-- � � �
•. - - .' �� � �
I� �' ` � � � _ _ � _ " � - i
v �`
J� � � T r�..�� � � 1
1 `
I � �� � , � •�' IfM \s �
1 ,�4�.��� . . - �:�-� ���.
� ' Ii � � � :�. � .r r— ' �I . . �1 �Q
R O � j � " � � ' I
r +��� � _ i ;. y. _J � ° �
l � ' -� I
� p � 1� J��.� 1. oii
0 .�: � r.'
�i r ' �r � . 1 :: i � �
- � I ��� . . �' *p. . . _ � 1
I � � - 1 � '' ��:� : j .�, . . I
., ��. . �
a , ; ..� . ,. �
I � :}�vJ�ii �� .�� .> �t 1' �� _ 1 �
� •
: __� __J �__ _! ��. � '� j �� �
i . ----�- . ' � j� . `, •.I, �6
1 �. �� � ' .���jr� � ., ",�' � � r� � � Y i
I. . ' 1 � � � �, � . . I
<, � �
��
-- �_ n�m �
A � _ /= rN�� eew� s' ,�. L L E Y � � __ �--
�l •
F E � � �j ?003
CITY G. ��vGF1ME
PLAf. ,; �EPT.
,�� .. CITY OF BURLINGAME :
RUHCrAMi P�NNING DEPARTMEN i•
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
' BURLINGAME, CA 94010
�''ti....,,�,.•'r� TEL: (650) 558-7250
Site: 1544 & 1550 Bernal Ave.
4
_. y
;
Application for parcel map lot Nne adjustment; application �;
for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling
with a detached garage at 1544 & 1550 Bernal Ave.; cAPN P U B L I C H EA R I N G
025-213-080) Appiication for design revfew for a new two-
story single family dwelling and special permit and front NOTICE
setback variance for an attached garage at 1550 Bemal r --
Ave, zoned R-1. (APN: 025-213-110). I
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the I
following public hearing on Monday, February 10, 2003 at �
7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Coun�il Chambers located at 501 j A copy of the applic
Primrose R'oad, Burlingame, Califom`sa j to the meeting a
i Burlingame, C " �
Ma11ed: January 31, 2003 ; .
(Please refer to other side)
;
�
i
�
;
If you ch�
raising on
described
at or �prior
Property o
tenants ab
558-7250.
Margaret Mi
City Planner
y be reviewed prior
� Primrose Road,
.
CE
be limited to
blic hearing,
d to the city
ming their
call (650)
(Please refer to other side) .
. ,.,:c, ��,. .,,�: .r�'. .;
CITY OF B URLINGAME
�
� ,�.��' 'T� o�, CITY OF BURLINGAME
RUN nM� PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, �, . . °¢. ' . 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
•,
' BURUNGAME, CA 94010
i �°'b,,,,,,�„,.'�� TEL: {650) 558-7250
; Site: 1544 Bernal Ave.
i
_ �
{
Parcel map for lot line adjustment and application for
design review for a new two-story, single family
dwelling with detached garage at: 1544 Bernal Ave.,
zoned R-1. (APN: 026-033-230).
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on Monday,
February 24, 2003 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall
Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California.
Mailed: February 14, 2003
(Please refer to other side)
�
PUBLIC :HEARING
NOTICE
_ �_:_� ..___._ RT_ - ----------
-, ;,.._ _
='. �;.,. «�;»•n,re. ; :., __ , .
�
described i 'c �x ,;, :w�ri��
at or prior t �„�
C .� t a �' ca
Property o ers o re i ' 1
tenants ab t thi not`i
558-7250. ank u.
��.�, • � � �
Margaret ���� � �
City Planner .�
�U .
PU ,.�. , �
Burlingame, Cal'
,,�. qir: " r ±.; _ �
If you chal ge t ' ect �pplicatiop � sj in court; u
raising onl hos ssues �you or someane else raised
CITY OF B URLINGAME
A copy of the applic ' 'N" : ro,� ay be reviewed prior
to the meeting a la ' g� D a ent 1 Primrose Road,
(Please refer to other side)
N t r�.
��0�
��
�11 `
I�TICE
be limited to
�blic hearing,
;d to the city
ming their
call (650)
r
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A
NF,W, TWO-STORY DWELLING WITH A DETACHED GARAGE
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi�n
review for a new two-story dwelling with detached garage at 1544 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, Denise
Lau�esen- Balestieri, property owner, APN: 026-033-230;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
February 24, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a
residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences inaybe constructed or converted
under this exemption.
2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for the.parking variance are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Ralph Osterling�, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 24th day of February 2003 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for design review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage
1544 BERNAL AVENUE
effective March 3, 2003
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped February 13, 2003, sheets A.1 through A.6 and sheet L1, and that any changes
to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional stiall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall
provide the certification under penalty of perjury;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before
a Building permit is issuec�:
6. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and the Fire Marshal's November 25, 2003,
memos, and the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2003memo shall be met;
7. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm
Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;
9. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property corners and set the building envelope;
10. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation
of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
11. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storni Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site
sedimentation of storm water runoff;
12. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a
complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and
irrigation plans at time of permit application;
13. that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height;
15. that the tree protection measures detailed in the February 13, 2003, Certified Arborist Report
shall be established prior to construction and maintained throughout construction by the
certified arborist and be inspected by the City Arborist before a demolition permit is issued
by the Building Department for the existing single-family residence and/or accessory
structures;
16. the property owner shall be responsible for submitting a certified arborist's report for
approval by the City Arborist before a final Building permit is issued to address a
recommended maintenance program for the three protected-size trees on site (the two Coast
live Oaks next to the creek bank and the Magnolia in the front yard of 1544 Bernal Avenue)
for at least three years following construction; failure to do this resulting in the loss of the
protected trees shall require that the property owner replace the lost trees with trees of a size
and species selected by the City Arborist; and
16. that before a demolition permit is issued Building Department for the existing single-family
residence and/or accessory structures, the applicant shall apply for and be issued a Tree
Removal permit from the Parks and Recreation Department for the two Eucalyptus trees on
site that will be removed.
3
- � •It � -� .�.:... . .
�. ' �. � I i ' � �� �t - ` � •� • �'. �
.� . ; �. . r ,.
, /� �f �: � ,.. � . . _.
'� . ti4 : � - � �� '.
�'� `/ �� `�.►�� � - 1 � ! '.. i '. y ►�''� �` - '�,. .
.af ,i;A �J'.� �r' y� �� . .. g 1 �"��t� �.� . �,� ��r"��:. �.
f �; ' /� �� '� �+.`�. t , .� - . / � �'"!,� � ' I�
: A` �,� ' '\:� � � � • I�i - :e -. . T f a �
':� . r'• 's�„ %. _�. /�e.�� �, :,.��. � .` .+ �".,t� - - .,
/�� � ,V .� ' i ..
1 : t . ��� . �', r ;yA" ♦ r�. , � ' � c'
� ' � r��. , t � ,r ���` � �,� ., ���, - � �I1 . . . F ..
� T , �r : �� " , • . L,:
n . � ) ' �� , . O\ i;�,^ys ` ��� 1 �. . �"' �t .� . � �, .R%� � �� '^� .�,s,
• �. Y ►�� ,! ' ' � ` � , ' ��• a� � ��� � iY
' � '� }F ��` ' �' far � , � � , i i ���p .� �
, ��� r ��: "�,� �, �� ,. . .
A,F `i � ` .,, / . .. .
�� `C i t ..�.}� � ` 1 1�- ! • '! :� � 1� � � �� ��j4� ._.
{' 3 : y .��-<l �.�' - M�. � . � ., ,.' ' 4 �.'
y�r kt' S .j` R.r . J. a � �(,�.. , j �"') E� ` :.) � I �:'� ,-,j ';
�y���'" �i'' �4, r,:'w <'. ,,jj �, .w,�.a- �'r �F -? . .._,...
• � i' ♦ " � �ti :_� . �1� � _ i��. " t.' �{r' ' ' .
'" .. + .I'.� ' �� . ` -\ . . . -., '� - . . .,. �
�.: � �.r �� , . �,/. - i`� q� � . ✓ .%a.�� ..v
• �:- ,. < a r �. � � . ��
.�ba � �-"'`` �;' yt > .� �'^ i s � . `'�?n... .. __
':�t � �' ;d � ��. �..• � e � l �` �i. <•. , .. ���� . . , - �
, ��(,'`��. .�►. �y 4�� R�� �r i � / 7�,5�• a. . 1 l � ••�. . . � •.,�. � .
r � a x, ✓ ,. �- � ,f � ... '}� � .
! � p � c '1� y ,. ' , . ♦ . ' i' 3 t ` "' _ _
• / .�. '" � , M� � . .�
� • � *{�'- ','� � ' t t \�� � ' „ '
` � ,,,��"� 4 r��' , � . �'.' �'t ,
� �7�� , �{,.. 0. �,-.
ti ,'-�•. t�} ,� .� rt , �
;i+ �`f�� o\`. �^i ..,� �� .4 ����{• .. ... '�. _�— �. jA. . r;,l�'�. .
� ,f �y'� A,,, � ' . , _ �. �'� � �n '� J
� i�� � � � ' \ � �' � 3 J���, t r.�w
„it�. � (, 1 ,��� � ��� � /�, r i J � q
°1 � .-f.� . �� ' � .♦ � ' _ .. M , i-�.,�� 1
' "�. '� ` ' M � ,', '�. .. , � . "`, `� . � ` °�.: ,: � .3 J�„ -
� �• , •
�.�f ,� r ��� ���:1� � / '� ' �.��"'`�� �'� 2� .) .��/�
�s'`� , , ,� ,�� �'' �"� yr.� � �C - f/ '�S+
b \F. `� �, .,�4 t `` � �„ tR+ � � r�/
-r� � ,f. , � '. �' � '�� Li'� . � .a, � r
t ,�' � - . �` ,�; `���tL i ���� � . ' 1553 ; �'�, , � f �. ��.�
e!. ,�' F� i n �c . ` � i ... � � �J% Y�; i � � '�E � `t�'
ti �\ `� � `�`5�U "' Y iS / � 1� � ♦• � w v,r �
I � : � - r. ' , - '` � /:' +�'�+ , � �.
� � ; �`�k `•��• '. �. Y � .. � � �
�� '� `.y7F �` �,4.. � ���,{' .� �^ ti ,� � T .
:r� �� . � � t ''}'. ' 1 � f
�,, � b � �' r: ' � � ` ; � � � .
��: "� . ,;�'. . ., ,� � � �.� t 1550 � , : � :.�° , �,� .1537 � .�� .
.;� �. , i '�sk .: ,1t..4\ ..' _�. ..F� O . �� i, .� {�, . � ' ♦ .�i
° T `���5 , 4� ' . • / ' � i�('� ` v},•i. ,�.. ;�j �
�.� _ ���� .
,� � . 8 � J`
,�y �t � � � �-�• '�. . 154�` �..� � �, �.,. ,� �, � � , .
s..� � ;� '� �,�. �: � � '� �.�,.- ; = �.� ,
�`��.. y " , } ~ ". . , . � �' ''. ;`� � ' � � . �
.� ,� � .^ „ ` �'•°l` � ��
, i; �»'t�i � �� � � � . s�� - �f``� ' i � i :��;` �tl�'. . - ,
„1 �� tr ,.xSj° � `:.'} , . , � • 1 ,i,(,� ,':�`� '*r�c�'1..ti. .,;` � !�. �
�}� �.:- `x;:w ,� ����� +�:�.-,.>� �. ���s .�-� ��51 ��%�� � , W/� y>•`. ..j. a:�t` - .:�� �+
Fy #� i, ri `y� . .f..r � � ,} ` � . ` u � r;• � T`�: �' . , �4.: � � '� � t � � ,a� �,�
�`�ti�` i� \, . ' . •� _ , �r� :f'�,ry � '�'� 'i / � �'";*j. �
Q,. 't .: ; � • ,� �,� , , i , r ! �,. � t.,
�'. +� 'r � • 1t _^ , 1 .. ..� � •. t t ,�, ,
��"`{' �y'��:,�. ,4; ,r :� , . 45 ', ; .,,.,� ;�o,. �`,, � �� � .
..,��` ���, I�'�'�sti � . �,. {\` 4,�, � in �� ,� v�j .t+',.• .•� "� : �., ��'�� ,��' `/' /��,t:
9 '
�. y,� � ,� Hs i��i .� f �1i � ' � � • �i � �w,�, � � ;� � � i ..�5°� . ..
t �� a ; � � � � . ��' � -�.:,, t �f; ,� 1541,, o � �`` �� � J� �: � � r . � . �. '�� v,
., , , . ,,�• 1 , ''� : ti ,,,; - � � ' ' � � �
/' /1 'i, �/ �,:�� �
� '� • I^��" �� `" : /� ,, � 1 � J�31 �� �t, �'�'�'' ;�, '' � %�
. ,� � ; tia,,�`/� ��, . €� ',:' c "°:� �. � 4 �
`4 ` � `� �r `--.�, ���
� � � `,..'P r,, 'i '� •. �. � , ♦. /_ � ' p• ,'�. , • "3 / �'A�
�; a ♦ � �.:,� 'ti�' + � � � �. J �?�ai',�
•� `Yl��S�. ...t• ,/` �,,r..�! • , ,� /�, � r �1y, ��.`f.g"�1�
!.� - " i�. � � %!-_ � ;:�' , :. ..'T� � '� �, Fy�� - � t� .', ��• �+' �
-+r� h 'G � ;+ . � '�: � > 4>�
��:: r ,�'ti . t.� w `' � . � r� � .. � j Y � • , �� � � �'�'�; � /' v 1 ,��R. p� �''i,. .�f;� .,:
� e+ � � �� ,. � � N*! � .' 1 '•� '~ � � �V;��� �.��7
J �: ► �• , h���a� • � i�~�, � �' `~ , � . �y. � .
. +� ���. ��� Er ��', ��, � �. � �. �.. '. . . ,. . , '
.. �„�r � �. a, , �� -ti .
s,, :,� �K . �� � � � •� ` V
l � �" k 'v' �� � -ayt4' :`�T`� + .e��'` , - y ,� ' � . �� ��,�/ � � � ; ��
� {
�. � • � �` �
3 `•w, �1 � ',` ��t� t. �,T, .r ` � � "�•
." �'t� �✓�� ,: j � r', �' � �, ; � a •�-: i / '�"� i �
9�� � `�,. ,� � R � ' � :..r� / � �� }�,:'� / �Y vt - �
�.L.�' .�,: %�. '� .� ' t�'� �..!�,. ��' .� , �' `'� • �, .<
� ��w,'. i.�'; �;, ,�°�t/ :� � .`` �.� y �' ,� ' , � r .`
;,':.. \�� , .�. 4 ;�. � � �.�' ' "`?, `� i ��+'� f. � . J'
,(� �, r '� . •
(� i ' t ; 1. .7 . / \. . � � i � t`4' ; � . .
�! '�/' , � �� �1� � �`r �� ��.* .T�.` � � f �
i;;� � `,>•� ,,�y /r^T ,`�C.A�/' , � . , .. ., . .�r'9r' ^ � . � , / � � , . �" � .� ,,�'! � r
�d 'f, / ~�� � � ' • � � � �i► �.{ ��.�'' � .
�/` �� �jr .�` �� � r�. �», �. �`p �,, �.` . yi. ,.
` '� �" ' � �'t -• : TI f;. b ��` � �` �'� �� � " � r �/ �' � ra7
� _ '�* ..Y:: .. I
. � t� o� ��.;��`4 . /��J�� , ,' a -+,. v,-',�� I,.t �l,j '�KS 4�. � :�
s �S- . '•t i� f M, �: 1� ,"j � fl - 'fi � � � i ':��!'� f ,�y�
, �, . < ., � � , ;� �. 1'�' � � �; tq 7�' �9� � r• �
� iy�• � �-y' . • � � •�`,rj .r.'i• ,s`r`�:` .{ ,1. � �z. �3�
ei'' � � / t�,�f � „ �
t� � `t� �+ ';i V�' � Y�i � ti. � � ,,•` -,� I�.,' � �� � .
t'
Plai�ning Department Plan Review Comments Page 1
,�s� ��TY °.�
BURLINGAME City of Burlingame
� PLANNING DEPARTMENT 558-�z5o
.,� .
:o
Plan Rcview Comments
Job :lddress: `_ :�"� i=1f'r Y-�n_ 1 Date of Plans: ��� Z 2' �2
Job Description: � � .� ' a , � i_,., �-- � 0--4 � • � a, � , =�t ;. �''�� � ('r � { ; '�
LO"I' SI'LI; �;:��~i-� ti-� -+- p.
LOT COVERAG�
v
-_ ✓, �.. .� � � � 1�PN: OZCo - C `;'� -1 �;�1 �
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
/ C.-'� % �r . � . � , � � � 40% X t :''`' •�'� �..'SF
E'� `b ccv � ' ''
.� z �- ��� � �
I �-5C� � 5��
•_ . l„I � ; ,, � 1 �.-. ' (
; . _ ; •-J .� , � � T
,,,.� -��� ' " ` � � ,� .f � � � � ` � •"
COMMEN"I'S
FLOOR �REA RATIO
`�,'.� t' '
`..__�.�._ � _.-..�--.
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
� f : �. � � COR1�fiE�'�6�
/� A " 1 !� � ��°�Q � - c-r ��nn cj1
,�
. �i 1 ��`1)....
(J
,� � ( � . . T . 7 �.>
INTERIOR LOT
� �' ' �"�` ' ' � 32%Z' � '1'��SF+1100
. , ,; �r` v �r� �h �',
� (+ 400 SI� Dr;I'. (;:�Rr1Gi;) Sl�
.. � . r" ' � ' ' % �q "' � ' v,:`;,�._'
� - �,-, � r , �. �
� �..J �.. " � r � .
COMMENTS
� ��, � � ��
Planning Department Plan Review Comments
SETI3I�CILS
Page 2
EZISTING 1'ROPOSED ALLOWED/RF,Q'll
rRONT- 1 ST FL = � � � + ; ,, ' ...1���'13LOCIL �VU.'`� �
% r 1 y . �.�_._ - -
FRONT- 2ND FL � , ' � i I � ..' ) ': .
`I i, �; , `f ,
SID�;- LEFT ; , � ��,
�. Lc:' �'
SIDE- RIGHT � �J .� • �
L � �:..
REAR- 1ST FL .� ��� 15'
� ..� .G'- �` /
RF,r'�R- 2ND FL , -, , 20'
� �
CO1�11��11:NTS
HEIGH'I'
�,,. _.
O �-Q `
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
� �j /� �' 2 1/2 STORIES/ 30'
AVEI�,GE TOP Ol� CLTRB: � c-� ' I ._. � '� - . ° �- ,
...� � } . .-�- � .
COMMI.NTS
DECLINING HEIGHT TNVELOPE
� '�Y �
i._
LFFT SIDE POINT OF DLPARTURE � . �� ; � =:, ..� � ' , � � ' / f �
RIGHT SIDF: POINT OF DEPAKTURE
COMMENTS
�„c 4 _ _�.__ M� �. L ::� .�k`a .
�� , , �
�
Planning Department Plan Review Cominents
NL�MI3ER OF I3FDROOMS
EXISTING PROPOSED
`�i
Pr,RKING
Pagc 3
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
CO�'I:RI�,D SP��CRS � COVERI;D SPACF.S .�`- COV�;K1�D SP��CF,S
1 ��� ;? 1 ,. 4- � (10'-0" Z 20'-0")
+ 1 UNCOVER�D + 1 tTNCOVERED + 1 UNCOVERED
COMMLN'I"S
r�CCI�SSORY STRUC"1`URF, RI?OUIREI�IENTS - CS 25.60
a. 2 or more acc. strs., each with 100 SF of UFA
b. any single acc. str. exceeds 600 SF of G�^r�
c. all acc. strs. e�ceed a toral of 800 SF of GFA __
d. acccssory structure in front of main building
e. acc. str. than 4' to other structure �
�
£ acc. strs. covex >50°�0 of rear 30% of lot
g. plate line of acc. str. > 9' abo�re grade
h. roof ht e�ceeci 15', �vith pitched roof
i. windo�vs w/i 10' of P/L or 10' above grade
j. �vater/sewer connections/bath/toilet/sho�ver
k. enclose mechaiucal equipment < 10' from P/I,
1. storage > 10% of floor area of main structure
m. use as acc. living quarters, recreation, home occ.
n. acc. str. �vill be greenhouse, lanai or patio shelter
Planning Department Plan Review Comn�ents
o. inore than 28 feet in length or depth
p. garage �vithin rear 40% of the lot
;r�� � , , � � � ��. +n -�-- I�.� 1 �..� a . �� � '� ��. � �> ,
2 Qa � c�E_ � 5 -�- d �,P Q �/�� �` ✓^ Q�.0 i re S
,�%�1 r �F � ( rM. �� � ; "P � C , � � � , � �1 Y i wl � � �
PLEASE YROVIDE PROOI� O� OWNERSHIP FOR PR(�PER"I'Y �
r�DDI1'IONAL COMMENTS �
�r
� �� Y �f :, `�� �r�_,� � �� �o�, n-�-.� Ye � C ��� c �C � � � < <
� �Q,r<r �5
�oZ(� - c�3 3� 2� 0, 02� ' Zi 3"��-'c> �- I► .
_ O O,� - I► C7 L� r� -�-a �e n-�r�� rr� b�c �.s v. <<� �� Lc CQ YT-�
�' -i►a
�c�rce 1`�., j�,�N. �v�i� ��c�c f�C� -O��C-� �%�
l �' -�-r�- cL-�-�--�r� ✓�-�G�-� , "`� ma �2.
d�C r; r, c�-�-- �� v�' __
Z lou '� 1 c1 a b�e lo�-� -l-I�- �a�k 1��^-� -� �uc�c� � y-a� Z�
;��� c� -- � � O �.�v � l I ,�'t �, v� -}-0 1�c G.rc� s� c� � I o�--
!; v� s� � r� d�.,� r-,- ►-� --23 t� c �.� �►1 h��,� --� 1�
,�,c4�` d -�-o �-I�.�- Y ��, �1-�- a ✓� � ID ' {� c� E c �.� � �� +� y
�l� �, � . -^ , � ,. <-, _ � iI� . � . �,C
Page 4
��
PI,EASE INDICATE ON PI.ANS LOCr�TION AND "I'YPE OF r,LL I:ZIS'I'ING Lr�NDSC1�PE
TREL:S, r�S WELL r1S ANY'I'REES TO BE PLAN'1'F,D ON PROPFRTY
(N07'E: FRUIT TRBI:S r�RE NOT DEFINEll AS "Lr'�NDSCAP�? TREES" I'LR C.S. 11.06)
THIS PROJECT WILL R�QUIRE L' I.r�NDSCr,PE TRFFS
� � ��- ��, t��:_, s-s
D11TI: PLANS REVIEWLD
4. ; . ��. , �"? �-1
�` �/ -l. e '- ' .-
�
REVIEWF.D BY �f'� �� �.�--
_. �
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED