The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1529 Bernal Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 3 Regular Action � � ti � +,; , . �� ; , �� ,�,. � a�, � �' ,� �: �A. z � �.tifh'_+:_yT � � ,� , � . � �-, .�. � � � � . � �. �� ; �, �u e< < .. � � '� , k �� ' +r °�, '�,, < '' }� �,� � � � ��' «� .�° �s; v. �' .� yi- � y��" � .:Y i� ?�e < r„y, . ,. . . '� "� i" � ".� � -s . ��1� .. 3 .�._aa� k r: . 4? �� y �� .* . .. .. .. �@ PROJECT LOCATION 1529 Bernal Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permit Address: 1529 Bernal Avenue Item No. 3 Regular Action Meeting Date: June 9, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for basement ceiling height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Randy Grange, TRG Architects Property Owners: Steven Crooks and Helen Miranda General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-034-050 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The proposal includes demolishing the existing one-story house and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,418 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed project is 2 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. The proposed two-story house will have a 699 SF basement. The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a basement ceiling height of greater than 6'-6", where the proposed basement ceiling height is 9'-0". The top of the finished floor above the basement is less than 2'-0" above existing grade and therefore the basement floor area exemption applies to this space. A total of 699 SF has been deducted from the FAR calculation (the maximum allowable exemption is 700 SF). The proposed detached garage provides two code-compliant covered parking spaces for the proposed five- bedroom house (three off-street parking spaces are required for a five-bedroom house, two of which must be covered). There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010 (a) (1)); and ■ Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (9'-0" ceiling height proposed) (CS 25.26.035 (fl). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review and Special Permit 1529 Bernal Avenue Lot Area: 6.000 SF SETBACKS Fronf (1st flr): (2nd flr): Side (/eff): (right): __. _...._ ... _..... Rear (1st f/r): (2nd flr): Lot Coverage: _ _.__.. __ _ FAR: __....... ___ . # of bedrooms: Basement: __ . __ Off-Sfreet Parking: __ _..__ _..... Building Height: __ DH Envelope: PROPOSED 16'-5" 21'-10" 11'-0" 6'-0" _ __ _. 39'-3" 39'-3" (36'-0" to 3'-0" eave) _ _..._. ...... 2353 SF 39.2% _ _ 3418 SF 0.57 FAR _ ..... .. 5 _. basement with a ceiling height greater than 6'-6" (9'-0" ceiling height proposed) 2 _ __ _ _ _ 2 covered, detached (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ _ _...... _ _ _. _.._ _. 28'-9" _...... _ .. complies 1529 Bernal Avenue Plans date stamped: May 29, 2014 ALLOWED/REQUIRED _ _._ __ __ _ _ 16'-5" (block average) 20'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" _ _ 15'-0" 20'-0" _....... _. _ _ . 2400 S F 40% _ __ _ _ __ _ _ 3420 SF' 0.57 FAR _ _ _ ...... _. ..... _ _. Special Permit required per C.S. 25.26.035 ( fl _ _... ... 2 covered, detached (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 30'-0" _ C.S. 25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3420 SF (0.57 FAR) 2 Special Permit requested for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (9'-0" ceiling height proposed). Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on May 27, 2014, the Commission had several comments regarding the proposed project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all of the required information has been submitted (see the attached May 27, 2014, Planning Commission Minutes). Please refer to the attached meeting minutes, the applicant's response letter dated June 2, 2014 and revised plans, date stamped May 29, 2014, for responses to the Commission's comments. Planning staff would note that building permits issued for additions, new houses and re-roofs do not specifically indicate what type of roofing is included in the project, therefore Planning staff could not provide a list of existing houses within Burlingame containing standing seam metal roofing. y� Design Review and Special Permit 1529 Bernal Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Required Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 29, 2014 sheets A1.1 through A4.1, L1.0, L2.0 and PW.1; and that the two trees along the rear property line shall be a Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) and a Pittosporum undulatum (Victorian Box) and shall be 24- inch box size when planted, as shown on the Landscape Plan, sheet L1.0, date stamped May 29, 2014; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's March 31, 2014 memo, the Parks Division's April 7, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's March 28, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's May 8, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; �c� Design Review and Special Permit 1529 Bernal Avenue 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, applicant -4- Design Review and Special Permit Attachments: 1529 Bernal Avenue Applicant's Response Letter and Photographs, dated June 2, 2014 May 27, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes Written Comments Submitted by Jeff Bauer, 1528 Vancouver Avenue at May 27, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Rendering of Proposed Project, submitted by project architect, date stamped May 15, 2014 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 30, 2014 Aerial Photo �� TRG June 2, 201=� Planning Comtnission City oi� Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlin�ame, CA 94010 RE: 1529 Bernal Ave. a.�' �. Y V IL.. 9..Ji 'UN - 3 2014 ;;{TY QF BURLINGAME , , Dear Cotnrnissioner, You first reviewed this proposal as a study item on Tuesday. Vlay 27`�' We ha��e made some rcvisions based on Ylanning Commission comments from that meeting, as well as comments from the rear neighbor. We have changed the dining roam windows to doors. We have noted that the windows are to clad in aluininum. In the landscaping, we have: changed the Japanese :Vlaple at the rear property line to a fast growing evergreen, we have moved the proposed olive tree in front a bit further from the house, and we have replaced the proposed vegetation under the oak trce at the rear of the property to low water use natives. We will be providing information on the metal roofing as requested. At this time we are still proposi�g the material due to its crisp look, its recycled material content (and recyclability), and ease of adding solar, both standard panels and the more discrete peal and stick panels (uni-solar). 3d images will be provided for the meeting. As requested, we will be assessing water table information to the best of one's ability when soils reports are in hand. We hope you like the revisions and look forward to the meeting to discuss the project. Thank You, Randy Grange AIA L�:F.D AP �Neqded �� 3U5 Paik Ruad, Sui[c 103, Burlingamc, CA `)4U10 �"�� , G50.579.5762 Faz G50.579.0115 www.trgarch.com �� x � x. �� . : , :�} �.h.�� i` ��i �, ��. �� ?�� it �'F'� ,L�'3 :" . -�oc1►� �-----. �. � � V '� �� •��. : , �t ..,� R ,'� {� . � _��' ��~ � � . ' � e �5��. � � M ` ♦. � �� "' i�. .;.� �%�F� P � i, � �� . � -''' n`� . . � �''^ �y h , L �T . � �� :� .� � �� 10 Wickham PI Hillsborough Custom-built metals, 1" ribs, weathered copper (color) � ` �.�, , ., t � � �,�;,;�r . -=__._ � � , _ ``\ ,_ �----_ �� \,�;�_ ,',. . 4 .` )` � ;' .t�� r r f YE � � + � �, �,' , � n 1.� ,�p�,��r;� ��'!'' ,:f �c. •ij°'G '!t-.' ...� ,,,� �et ,,, - � +.f , �-. � ,",•-r' ; � 215 Uplands, Hillsborough (Similar material) i ,; {�,:. . r � v ,� '!' , � � .� �r ,�l'{r; .r ` �Y' � .� � . �� t .� :�. v .� '�"�; ✓? �•, �� L �. � �� . �% �� + � � '��:i � ��p,�' ` ��1� ,. �� 1:. 'y .r +�Y �� . � il' .� , ,-. ,. .:, i • ,'h�: ,�, �r1i� �F ` . ,i� . r r� •+� , . .. _ , r- ; . Ki nR �' t �, �., . � , �, : �''� � d � � �•r .� rs t � i .7�• .:ti: ` � ' .t . • � � +tt�� •" ► . % ; .� !�'.xY, t,t� �.. � � ��ht1�:�� r � ;�,��is ,✓ :� _� � � �- , �� , �'• �� V �; . �r� � -��;��, ,i'. ;N:; r' ` � � � �', s. • , v w• ,• , '�, �r - � T y � ' v �.i.•�" '..{ � .i � �i: "'� .," �� r+":•'3 `'..� . #i' �,y` ' � �� : . r , . ' � � • ��, ' r . � t �� i � . - �� , � " ::k ' ,�� . . �^ . .�iff'Y°�_.,l' ,''�� ' w �}' + lt�" � ,. , �.. , ��. ��, ' � �4 .�2'yL'.' : ��" � . •+: � � �:tl� ' tJr�� I ��.• � �•`� ��` ��,4 I � . t ■ ,�,'1f � � � �. �H: µ � �rla �_�^ } ; K �� --i�� !�v' � .... _ -�r- ,,,.,4-L � � � � .�� ,.� • ♦ � H � � • � � 1 i \' �� ` r ;� � � .. , � ' -- � �� ♦' � � � �� ..e. � " �� -a �, � L �. ' � � r � . � 1 ' �_�� ' v.. . � ti '—� ' .h � . �n_.v.�7 � F � � ., •� �. � . r,K. 1! � f; � • .�` _y� ' �� .� "�1 A.. `w � � �p . �... ��,� ,`. _ '�_ - '_ � � � ��. �� r' f ` \ 1 � � � ■ I Uni-solar application: more discrete solar power � ` . T�'��. _�-.��-�_'-�.��-� _' �- _' . J � _ � �t: `, � `\ ,, .� .��y . ��:. �'�-=-�-=-�-�_-._ � - _- ; � : - ; � �� , � ,- , . . . , i � _'��. ��. ��. `�. . . � _ . . . . . . . ty�`- . �� i�#� _ :i•iill _. _ . �a� 1452 Drake Ave., Burlingame Metal roof under solar panels �� i ■ �� / �� ■ �il �I� � _a1t� .,,, ,_k , i :�i�i I � � . � �.., � i"�. ,;,,.,, - � :,,..,.� ,_- :��`��,. ��\��.; \ . r �1--� � �� __ � � _ -- — �� .r � , �� .._ , r .� =�i � �� , �� r � � �`� � . . .. . 1i .. ..-�`.. ....•< . . � }.n� _w'_..-i/uid Fs' .C:•.a s . ��ih6 y ... �w. _'r .�ii.r. -:� �^ ` . � TM�`��„� � wl .,�� '"�i� . . .��_ � '° . . . " . " _' _ .�.il�K.. ��.�, � �� . � ;�� „ ' � ��' I ■r l'r..' w �..��' � .� �`µ. . .. ..., Transitional inspiration photos of sloped and flat roof combinations. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED M/NUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California May 27, 2014 - 7:00 p.m. 12. 1529 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BASEMENT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; STEVEN CROOKS AND HELEN MIRANDA, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT• RUBEN HURIN All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications. Reference staff report dated May 27, 2014, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: What is limitation on basements in terms of ceiling heights? (Hurin: In floor area, any space greater than 6'-6" would be included in FAR. However there is also an exemption for a certain amount of basement area in FAR. If it meets the threshold of being a habitable basement, could have a higher ceiling height but would be reviewed by the Planning Commission.) Chair Bandrapalli opened the public comment period. Randy Grange represented the applicant: ■ Submitted a letter from neighbor wanting a different tree where a Japanese maple is shown. Owner is agreeable to the change. ■ Has tried to keep the massing from the street down low. ■ Greater than minimum setbacks on the side, so there is a lot of air space around the house. ■ The eaves are 30 inches so count towards lot coverage. While it looks like lot coverage has been maximized, 279 square feet of coverage is from the eaves. Commission comments: • Coast live oak will take over the far back corner when it grows. May need to look at something else. (Grange: Tree E— neighbor wants something taller instead of the Japanese maple. Will talk to the landscape designer.) ■ Metal roof is unusual for the neighborhood. Is the choice an issue of durability, or the look, or to allow solar in the future? (Grange: A lot of those. Great for attaching solar. Is a nice clean look — nicer than asphalt shingle. Reflects heat away, 99% recycled content.) It is a 40-year solution, versus 30- or 35-year composition shingle. ■ Likes design — likes the side entry. A different approach for the typical 6,000 square foot lot. ■ Considered having doors on the Dining Room to add more to the front? (Grange: Has considered doors and a terrace, but owner does not think they would use it.) ■ Entry does not have much presence. (Grange: If the entry was in the center, the Library would be moved over and the house would be wider.) ■ The Library presents a blank fa�ade to the street and looks boxy — needs some more work. ■ The roof over the entry does not extend out to give a sense of entry or allow it to be visible from the street — at least from straight-on or from the right. Needs some work — does not need to be moved to the front, but needs to be more clear that it is the entry. ■ Metal roof does not seem appropriate given there are not many in the neighborhood. Would not want to see a lot of inetal roofs appearing in this neighborhood. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2014 ■ Glass stair tower is odd for the house. ■ It is contemporary but softened so it fits into the Easton Addition more than a strictly modern design. ■ What is flat roof material? (Grange: A sheet membrane.) • What materials will the windows be? (Grange: Aluminum-c�ad wood windows.) Should be noted on the plans. ■ Needs to make findings for compatibility with the neighborhood. How would this design be compatible with the neighborhood? (Grange: Owner would like to do something very contemporary. Here has focused on the massing of the house. It is an Easton Addition massing, but made more contemporary with material choices such as the smooth stucco. Believes massing means more than everything else; if it was a boxy modern house it would stand out, but this will work because of the massing.) ■ Massing fits Easton Addition. ■ Metal roof seems to go well with the design of the house, and goes better with the design than a composition shingle, but does not fit with the neighborhood. This will be "the one with the metal roof." ■ Landscaping is a bit stark. Should look at the ground cover to make sure it does not require too much water for the oak tree. ■ Olive tree in front seems close to the corner of the house — olive trees are wide, so should consider pushing it away from the house. ■ Massing works well; the roof forms and the size and shape of the house fit the neighborhood. Flat roofs can be controversial — question has been whether there are contemporary looks that still have a traditional roof form. This achieves that — is atypical but still fits into the neighborhood. ■ Special permit for basement ceiling height is more a function of having the basement be usable and livable. ■ Metal roofing is worth considering for sustainability and durability — depends on coloring. White would be glaring and attract a lot of attention it does not deserve. ■ Concern with water level in basements in the Easton Addition, and the need to pump lots of water. (Grange: Having soils report done now. City requires pumping of water out to street, including roof water. Could raise drain level so the pump only comes on when the water level is filling up. Wants to avoid having to pump all the time.) ■ Pleased to see the trees within the footprint of the structure are not being removed. Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission comments: ■ Understands the need to address sustainability and durability issues, but not sure if the metal roof is the right choice. Not convinced it fits in this neighborhood, given the density and feel of the neighborhood. • Perhaps a slate roof would work better? It would have a clean look and be durable, and is a natural material. Would not stand out. - Would be concerned if there ended up being 20 metal roofs in the Easton Addition. ■ If this is approved, probably won't have 20 houses but might have 5 or 10. ■ If durability is the criteria, would we allow vinyl windows? ■ The house has a somewhat Mediterranean character, but would not look good with a red tile roof. ■ Modern interpretation of a traditional design. • Would be helpful to have a sample of the roof — color and size. ■ Metal could mean cheap, durable, could suggest industrial or commercial. It is contextual. E CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2014 Have there been others metal roofs installed? (Hurin: 74 Loma Vista was approved but has not been built yet. Roof material is not tracked in a data base. The Council Chambers rotunda has a metal roof. Could visit an example and see how it might age.) The metal roof could be nice in itself, but question is whether it make senses on this particular street. Commissioner Sargent made a motion to place the item on the Regu/arAction Calendar when complete, with direction to provide roof sample and consider alternatives. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Bandrapalli ca//ed for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Ca/endar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0-0-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:52 p,m. 3 • City of Burlingame — Planning Commission BURLINGAME � � SPEAKER REQUEST Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission are asked to fill out this speaker request form to assisfi in preparation of minutes for the Commission's proceedings (PLEASE PRINT) Meeting Date: � / 2�- / I � Agenda Item: � 2— Project Address: /�Z�7 =.�-h 2Q �-,/',2 Name (If desired a pseudor�ym m�r be used to protect privacy) Address (Optional) r� � �z� 1/�►�Ca� � �2 C Telephone (Optional) Remarks (��-h o �, �_ ..� � wan,� '� w� ai'-� r n 7� � 2GY: �I �.�r� E-Mail (Optional) 0 .� ; o n � L��CS �� l � - � "f Y'e� �✓' `�%ii�S ��Gfi�� occ�C�l� D �S fi�,�t �-v�.� �c � e�v� i � Vvl,�i �� C�.� � �.+n.o u ° h . hK ( ��vlr; � � i � w�1.�- o� t''`{ �o�r� �✓c�. an co �,d Sa.� ��i � i r1,t� S: forms & templates \ pc speaker slip r ►�v�X b�,,�� ,�,,�y�� • �S �� G U - r� � rGw�, �► J RECEI�/�� MAY 15 20i4 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin ame.ore r�, c�T. o R � BURLINGAME ��b.. .� � Type of application Project address:_ APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Design Review V Special Permit ✓ 2 � APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name:��i �/y'i' Ci'S Name:�e�� trG/1(�c� £ ST2t/ei'1 �� Address: � 5 Pi412lt .� Zd3 Address: � Jr Z 9 Q�rh a(/�%4�/C . City/State/"Lip: �p ��ty/State/Zip: ��1� AA./ri(. � 9 �o l0 Phone (w): � � � rJ' � q ' �J' �'b Phone (w): �r'J ' ��i0 � �37 � �h�: .�- (�:�5�•5�`�•6115 �ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name:� IqR.G�"t �T�G'� `� }� S� Y Address`�� AIQ�G �. �� (h): c�:. City/State/Zip:�V(Z,�,�+�GAm��yo1� Please indicate with an asterisk * Phone (w): �� '�� • 5��6 Z- the contact person for this project. (h): c�:�.�Sd•��°��115" 13��^�Ss G�. � /� 5� Z. �ROJECT DESCRIPTION: N ) 2 ��a�z�/ . S�nr� T�ur<-� �B�f�r� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and co ct to the e t of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: � Z g! � I know about the proposed appli ti and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Co is 'o . Property owner's signature: Date: � I�ate submitted: � � �— � ' � � i��r'� � �' t; �� Conditional Use Permit Variance Other Parcel Number: PCAPP FRM CITY (�F BURUNGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. ��0 - -��a -�Z� ,��J. �� , ��U��!,�� `��i 5 -� � �S � S�, -�v,,� a �w �� ` � �'. �.� � •. . .• .. • . ��) � � � � � � �' � �-ua �� '`� �� `�.'�a� � �= �, � �S . � � . �,, � ---� �.�� -'r� � �r�� "v ! \ i� h � '� `.0 �� `� "''v' �-i �ti C� t S V oti- � � � l � i �- � f1'1 {- � r� �l,f . � . . J � M'd'� �1�a',.! '. `r� ; � �� 1 . � - .'� > '' . . . � . • , . ,,. . . ' � • . '. .; .� .� � t ' i , • � • / +�� - ,• , � , , , • . � Z . .� � City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.bu�lin4ame.orq � c�Tv ��:�� `�„� �,.o.... CITY OF.BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, sca/e and dominant structural characferisfics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. Se e a-�-ac� e d, Z. Explain how the variety ofroofline, facade, exterior�nish materials and elevations of the proposed new strucfure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consisfent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain how ihe removal of any trees /ocated within the foofprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for fhe removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.or4 1. Explain why the blend of mass, sca/e and dominant structural characterisfics of the new consfruction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish maferials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consisfent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how fhe removal of any frees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistenf wifh the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mifigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S.11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. Attachment A SPECIAL PERMIT BASEMENT WITH CEILING HEIGHT GREATER THAN 6'-6" 1529 Bernal Avenue The mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction are consistent with the existing street and neighborhood. There are a wide variety of houses on the street (in terms of style, mass, scale etc... ) and the proposed style fits in nicely. The proposed basement has no impact on the mass or scale of the structure. 2. The rooflines, faCade, materials, and elevations of the proposal are similar to that of other houses in the neighborhood. The roofline is varied and the fa�ade includes many architectural details to enrich its character. The basement is not visible from the street, and does not contribute to the rooflines, materials etc... 3. 1. The architectural style is compatible with the character of the neighborhood. 2. The detached garage is the same as the existing pattern, and consistent with the neighborhood. 3. See items 1 and 2 above for comments about style, mass and bulk. 4. A full landscaping plan is being provided, which will be a significant improvement for the site. 4. No trees within the footprint of the structure will be removed for this project. A few trees along the property line will be replaced. Please see the landscaping plan for additional details and new trees. . ,. .... ":a�.' �.� , . :.�_.� :r-+y h��a�� ,.�� 4 �I � �:" �:URLINGAME , � ,-!�;J�I�NING DIV. Project Comments Date: To: March 28, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage and a special permit for basement ceiling height at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: March 31, 2014 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. 3) 4) Specify that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Note: The California Building Standards Commission has delayed implementation of the 2013 Energy Codes. If an application is submitted for this project prior to July 1, 2014 then the project will be required to comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. When plans are submitted for Building Code compliance plan check specify the method by which the standing seam roof on the dwelling and the flat roof on the garage will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2013 California Energy Code. 2013 CEC §110.8. The 2013 Residential and Non-Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.energy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 10)When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 11)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 12)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 13)Obtain a survey of the property lines. 14)Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2013 CBC, Table 602) 15)RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinQs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The area labeled "Craft" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16)Indicate on the plans that, at the time of Building Permit application, plans and engineering will be submitted for shoring as required by 2013 CBC, Chapter 31 regarding the protection of adjacent property and as required by OSHA. On the plans, indicate that the following will be addressed: a. The walls of the proposed basement shall be properly shored, prior to construction activity. This excavation may need temporary shoring. A competent contractor shall be consulted for recommendations and design of shoring scheme for the excavation. The recommended design type of shoring shall be approved by the engineer of record or soils engineer prior to usage. b. All appropriate guidelines of OSHA shall be incorporated into the shoring design by the contractor. Where space permits, temporary construction slopes may be utilized in lieu of shoring. Maximum allowable vertical cut for the subject project will be five (5) feet. Beyond that horizontal benches of 5 feet wide will be required. Temporary shores shall not exceed 1 to 1(horizontal to vertical). In some areas due to high moisture content / water table, flatter slopes will be required which will be recommended by the soils engineer in the field. c. If shoring is required, specify on the plans who's sole responsibility it is to design and provide adequate shoring, bracing, formwork, etc. as required for the protection of life and property during construction of the building. d. Shoring and bracing shall remain in place until floors, roof, and wall sheathing have been entirely constructed. e. Shoring plans shall be wet-stamped and signed by the engineer-of-record and submitted to the city for review prior to construction. If applicable, include surcharge loads from adjacent structures that are within the zone of influence (45 degree wedge up the slope from the base of the retaining wall) and / or driveway surcharge loads. 17)Indicate on the plans that an OSHA permit will be obtained for the shoring* at the excavation in the basement per CAL / OSHA requirements. See the Cal / OSHA handbook at: htt ://www.ca-osha.com/ df ubs/osha user uide. df * Construction Safety Orders : Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Article 6, Section 1541.1. 18)Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 19)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 20)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 21)Provide lighting at all exterior la i Reviewed b�� — Date: 3-31-2014 Joe -, -L'�O 650 58-7270 C Project Comments Date: To: From: March 28, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 55�-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage and a special permit for basement ceiling height at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: March 31, 2014 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. Provide separate irrigation (drip or bubbler) to new landscape trees. 3. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 4. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding �dth of Planter Strip needs to be implemented. 5. Garage and House construction is within drip line of existing trees. Provide a - Tree Protection Plan to protect trees dunng all phases of construction. b, Any root pruning of roots 2" or larger during excavation of new garage and house foundation will require a documented inspection from an on-site independent arborist to ensure survival of neighbors oak and rear neighbors trees. _ � 7; i Complete Water Conservation checklist (attached) B Disco 4/7/14 OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIEIVCY CHECKLIST I certify th the su�jperp�arect rr�ets the specified requfrements of the Water Co ervatfo 'n Landscaping Ordlnance. / . ature Date � y•,�,�• t :_ .: :�: _ :�,; _ : �., r-, :, :. ;;• � • �� , •� ,, -... �,.�• :� �..- • - _ �::.�;:....._ - - . : - ' :i;� � .��i.�' � ��; �j ��r'y:��'��.��,i1:�� 1!Tj� �ri,� �J.X1��7 �_� �,: , • � . , ' ' •-�,,� ...-•`. . _;.,� r J { { " .1 K• f�" Y�' �� ,• :�ti': 'i at` 7%� 1!•'":: , � o �� r nrp�- ^ • r . ,� .}, .., r , ,._-,._ �7• _.eJMi_ �-11��' Jt �r �.1 ��: y� ,t� 7n .� ..�I: ��: V'r�,%'' � �;'j' _� � - �.;- .- � ._bi_l. ..r�. �:'x .z �.c' ngle famlly D Multl-F y O Commer ial ❑ Institu o al O Irrigation only ❑ Industrial O Other: Applipnt Name (print): Contad Phone q: 0' 3 2' O Project Site Address: � , ::Agepcy'�teview': _ - _' � : . �Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): of Units: q of Meters: "(P.ass)��r�� (Fa11);.� i�7: :l�jl � I`i;1�11��'�ji J s3��' ��1�' Total Landsca e Area s h. i;�j . �-�-;;:i s r• ;,.. s- ;�, � ^�Q_ Q � �' ;(� ��7, y ( 1 ..�7.�; , P ( q• I� �ff�1' �11 ��: .�� ' !��- � � _ I"j�� 11��1;11��1l�,,,1�(�1�� ./S1� 1� � `�I�t .f��il�lai- �!i�'l�:�!�t«S!. �•_ �1�. ��1T�11�sii�:L`��i�+jl_3'?�ti)?ir?��il�ttl Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): - - . • � � Q � .. •. lU j�i �� rf�� j•�;,srj�i7 ��'�lt: � c Non•Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): �, � p:_j: ,�..jl��;t��;T,'�;r?y.��?�3;.'I��1:�:, ;n7 -• _- _ rl� i'� ;��:r"�`1;��?!i�tv��?� 5�151ry', Speciaf Landscape Area (SL/1) (sq.ft.I: '� O" 47: . �3�JI?�.,�'��.'- �''J��"' "''; ��'-��'`k �' water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.j: `�'��,,,` - �l: - • - + , i:l� • - :f..� : ' " _ .: ' ' ' � :'i.` � .'�� •'�y, � 'd :�.'_ '� tT �' i :-}�{L '! '� i �i ��.� [��' i�i �� r'J � :r.,_'- _':�;'r: L.] 1.�..r1J... �l�lii7. � ?• -,�:�.I_.f.�+i.l. � ,3�>.:•;-.,. �i:, ..�_fl�.i-._�Fi��.i71...a, Turf Less than 25�4 of the landscape area Is s �' Ci ._ .O; :.,_�. wrf ❑ No, See Water Dudget =�::' " - All turf areas are > 8 teet wide es ::;;0;;._-�:'.,,�0.: " All tu�f is planted on slopes < 25% es '•: :O � , "�: ': (]'� . � Non•Turf At least 807L ot non•wri area is native s �'� `0� ;.; C) :� or low water use plants � No, See Water Budget ,•�•-'.; ', Hydrozones Plants are grouped by Hydroiones es -:�.D:� �,:�:'..;C1;.�,;=1 Mulch At least 2-Inchesof mulch on exposed s �,':D•-~:;; ,:�'.0,.•. ' soil surfaces = � _�.%• Irrigation System Efflclency 7096 ETo (100'1G ETo for SlAsj Yes ,-rr1; �, ,; �. �••.0,��,�. No overspray or runoff A Yes �: � O:; �;: -';`; !7 r; Irrigation System Desi�n System eHiclency > 70',� s :• .0 -�.:', �;. •. O:: ,;.. Automatfc, sef(-adjusting irri�ation o, not required for Tier 1 �.�;D ,-'. .�O� .;� controflers O Yes , Moisture sensor/rain senso� shutoHs Yes `��' �C1-.";.��'``:�;�0:::, ; No sprayheads in < 8-ft wtde area Yes �:•O ��'.��=;-;; , O'; ;:'; Inlgadon Tlme System anly operates hettiveen S PM Yes `'�D.•�•�' '�' �0-` �' and 10 AM t Metering Separate irri�atian meter o, not required because < 5,000 sq.h. •"-O".�.:::i.�;D �= O Yes •',, � � Swlmming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended � 0 Yes �", �:•��.';.':,Q ::_ No, not re uired Waterfeatures Redreulating �� Yes �.�r0�--_�•>:�.'0�...; less than 10%ollandscape area TM Yes ::� q".'.':: ':..�'.0•':', Oocumentatlon Checkllst �.ifes 'i�'%� '.: C7 _ �. Landsc�pe and Irrigation Oesign Plan 0 Prepared by applicant � 0":�� ,�0�:. �, repared by professinnal � Wate� Budget (optional) O Prepared by applicant •=�O �-,. �'•: .• 0.�. ; NPrepared by professional . Audlt Post-installatlon audit completed O Completed by applicant O�� 0 � Campleted by pro(essional Project Comments Date: To: From: March 28, 2014 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage and a special permit for basement ceiling height at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: March 31, 2014 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding potential relocation of sidewalk area around trees in the planter strip. 4. Geotechnical report is required to identify adverse impacts on subject property and adjacent properties and provide mitigation measures for new basement. 5. Identify seasonal groundwater fluctuations and provide statement of groundwater levels for the wet and dry seasons. 6. Provide basement perimeter drainage design and potential groundwater pumping requirements with power backup (if needed). Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/06/2014 � � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS l� "� " `�T�Y Project Name:�rlNGsG6 l��►"�"�"1��^� Project Address: � �� The following requirements apply to the project 1 .�_ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) �'-ru�c.L� �,�,iy( � y�t,.,,(�;n �' � I�tG�r.rl�Yi �Ps�,cO �i�^'1-�^�'s=R-• 2 �_ The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 _,� The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 �_ The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: March 28, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 �Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558- 7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage and a special permit for basement ceiling height at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: March 31, 2014 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � l � �� <� Date: � � �'��. � `/ Project Comments Date: To: From: May 7, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for basement for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: 1) The Stormwater Requirements Checklist has been filled out and returned. It indicates that the project does trigger the new stormwater requirements. Site design measures 6.2.c.,d. will be utilized for compliance. 2) The Best Management Practices (BMPs) has been included in the design plans, include in the building permit submittal also. 3) There is no architectural copper used in the project. 4) These issues were discussed with Casey Darcy, project manager, on 5/8/14. Also discussed was the need to label impervious and pervious surfaces in the future. For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD � � Date: 5/8/14 1� AN MATEOrDUNTY W�DE Water Pollution p�everrtion Program Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects Municipal Regional S!ormwater Permit (U1RP) �rder No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No R2-2011-0�83 NPDES No. CAS612008 City of Burlingame - Office of Environmental Compliance 1103 Airport Blvd Office: (650) 342-3727 Fax: (650) 342•3712 Complefe this form for individual srngle (amily home projects of any size, other projects that create and/or replace less fhan 10,000 square feet of impervious surface, and projects in the following categones fhat create and/or replace less fhan 5, 000 square feet of impervious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities', and paricing lots (stand-alone or part of anofher use). A. Project Information A.1 Project Name: ��N�A ��5 /(��NC� A.2 Project Address: � '�J Z � ��AL �v�. A.3 Project APN: �Z �� Q 3 t,j _ O�� ! B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures 6.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2? � Yes ❑ No ➢ If yes, and the project will receive �nal discrefionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project musf include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at http.//www.flowstobay.org/bs new developmenf.php#flyers. ➢ If no, or the projecf will receive final discretionary approva/ before Decem6er 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to implement site design measures°, which may be required at municipalrty discretion. Consult with municipal staff about �equirements for your project. 6.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. Plan Yes No Sheet ❑ � ❑ � � ❑ � ❑ d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots) ❑ (� ❑ � ❑ � ❑ L� i. Use micro-detention, inciuding distributed landscape-based detention j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technicai Guidance) ❑ � ❑ � LJ 1`�I ❑ � I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) ❑ L� m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance) 1 See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here. Z Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checktist if the project is not an individual single famity home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surtace; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. 3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. ° See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). � �K o� a,�� P� G� r�� l� � �� 9� � �r ,�a"� Approved December 4, 2012 � Pool/Spa/Fountain C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consulf municipal staff.5) Are these � Features that � features in � require source ; project? � control i i measures I Yes No ❑ � Storm Drain ❑ j�J Fioor Drains ❑ � Parking garage Q� ❑ Landscaping Q � � Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ j$� Refuse Areas � � Outdoor Process Activities ❑ [� Outdoor Equipment/ Materials ❑ � Vehicle/ Equipment Cleanin ❑ � Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and � Maintenance ❑ (� Fuel Dispensing Areas ❑ � � � Loading Docks �� I�I ❑� � � Fire Sprinklers Stormwafer Checklist for Small Projects Source control measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) • Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. • Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.6 ■ Retain existing vegetation as practicable. • Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects. • Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. _• Use efficient irrigation system; desiqn to minimize runoff. • Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.s Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.s ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. ■ Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off and signed to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. ■ Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.� ■ Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and to drain to the sanitary sewer.fi ■ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas. • Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewers and contain by berms or similar. ■ Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewers, and sign as a designated wash area. ■ Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.fi • Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. s ■ Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. s ■ Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. ■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. ■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. • Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. ■ Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.s ■ Install door skirts between the trailers and the building. • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers Miscellaneous ■ Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air Drain or Wash conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewer.s Water I■ Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. I■ Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers. Architectural ■ Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and Copper l dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." I Is source control ! measure included in project plans? � ; Plan Yes No � Sheet No. ❑ �I , ❑ '�] j �tJ� , ❑ ,�1 I � ,� OI i � �� i I I ❑ � ❑ I � �I � � �v A ❑ � ❑ � ❑ �� ❑ �I ■ ►:� �� S See MRP Provision C.3.a.i(7). 2 Approved December 4, 2012 . Sformwater Checklisf for Small Projecrs ,D'. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required forall projects.) D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff wrll make this determination; if the answer is yes, Yes ❑ No� the projecf will be referred to consfructron sife inspecfion staff for monthly stormwater inspecfions during the wet season, October 1 through Apnl 30.) •"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Manaqement Practice (BMP j� ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to prolect plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. � ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. ❑ � Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees and drainaqe courses. ❑� Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: • Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; • Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; • Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation. f� ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather. ❑ (�, Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits. � ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. � j� Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams soil blankets or mats covers for soil stock piles etc. ❑ (� Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). � ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters dikes mulching or other measures as appropriate. � ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. ❑ � No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. �I ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. � ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. _ �� Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: C-1q N 17 Signature: o �� E. Comments (for municipal staff use only): � Date: � 2 ��p/i�l s� F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): L Approved December 4, 2012 6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment fac(lities. 3 Project Comments Date: To: March 28, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, finro-story single family dwelling with a detached garage and a special permit for basement ceiling height at 1529 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-034-050 Staff Review: March 31, 2014 1� Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single �amily home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSmProjSep 2012.doc To obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/StormChecklistSmallProj Dec2012.doc 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD Date: 4/1/14 saN MarEo�ioE Water Pollution Prevention Program ❑ean Water. Heal;ny Cr.mmunrcy Construction Best Mana e � g ment Practices (BMps) Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this pa�c, as they apply to your project, all year long. M1iaterials R N'aste i�ianagement � � �� !; °na� � �l � ri � � 1 !1 ` V y�� . �� ' y : i•'� �e; r � � �`; ��• � H"n'Ra:anbrs Ma�eria4 ❑ Brno aad cwxr s�oci;pks af a�d. dm n aher consauuwn maerial w�tl� mUs w-hen ram �s fwetazi or if roi aclivcl.� bemg uzcd a rthm i a a,�: O UfC (Dyl dOn'1 o�crYX) �yV�p) a��alcr fp �1��s1 canlrol HaaNwn Malrrial� � V� �� m�ICf1iIS illd IlYiadp�5 \\'aACs (SIKh df �� 7"'Ks. Ihin�s. solvn��s. f 1. ml. aM antifreea) in vad�nce vifi ci�r. wwin. s4�e aod fedoal regWatnnx. ❑ Sde AeaNaas ma�enals �od �.aars m waeu �sM1n conmrcn. mrt °� �p�P+� samdon� cauainnrcnl and co��r �h�m a� �Ac cad af �`T'! "� d+. or dvine na �ho or ahrn nin �s f.Yaas� O FaIIOQ manu(KIYRr'S �qplrahoo Insuuctwrts f hm.rdoui muenah+nd be �sePol ro` �o u: male �h.n aw�. Do no� •POti chemicals ouiAaan nhrn'am u fo�sm widun �I M1wrs. O.�^v'E� fw aPPApnete di�al o! all hew�e �.�yu Watc MaoaFcmrn� ❑ Cwv waste d�sposal comainas scurth� ..iih wps n ihc cnd af C�pY �1'O(k diY OM d1lllpg qCl N'm1�1Cf O Chat .eaAe dia�o,ul conmmers Gequrn�k� for kals and lo w\c me �� ae � o�cr411ed. Ne�v hoQ do.ro a dmnpyta m �he wnsvunioa sue ❑ Cle� ar replace Ponabk biMs. ad mspecl 1Mm Gtquenlh fa k�ki a'd spiW. ❑ Dnpnee o( dl �vaves �ed 4hru p�opulv. liecyck m�uls ud "�s ��skd (such a aphell. corcrcye. sBpep�e hme m.�;.�. � aro na..a vwa �.� � D�spme of 6quid residues f m p.mn. Wmnen. wl.en[s. Eluei end ckming fluida u ha:xAans �.ape CaMruetion Es�ranco aoU Perimaer ��+nd munuin cflcwrc pumrcier conwh nnd wMlv< all mmvcuon �uauees .od e.�ies ro w(6cav W eonaol aonon aid xd�eni dia�afg�y fioe� u¢ �od trackin6 oli �iR. O Snap or racuvm a1ry ma� trxking �........ik ond accwe �i somCC b plCYaM foMer va�k111g, }it�lr 6oY dm�T �»�a b tkan up tracki� Equipment Managemcnt & Spill Control ' � Main�cnancc anA Parkin� ❑ Dcsigin�e an+iea. 6ncd with apprupriep� BMPL fa .duck and equipmcnt peA;mg and slora�e. � Perto'm mapr mo�mrnance. repairjabs. and rehick "'d W��P^�� N�+ahing aff si�c. ❑ If eefmlmg or �eluck maimew�ce mos[ bc dme onnlc, irark m a bcrn�ed ue axay fiom s1o�m dnnn and o�xr a dri0 Ven big oaugh b cdkci 9oids. Re��ck w disp�ne of 8uids y prrardoua pau�. p ne O If rehzk or eWipmrn� cleaning m�a16e dooe o�im. elean nnh cwn onlv m a bermed arca t6m mll od albo� rwe wnv ro�v„ inw guners. auixtz vam dnw, m siv6ce wams � Do na ckan .chick a cWiPmuµ am�e nsn9 wepy sol.�rnu. dePlensr+s. suam ekaom6 �W�P^mL ac. Spill Prrrention a�M Com.ol ❑ Koep spll ekmwp maicn�ls (ny, aMo�6en�s. e¢.) na'Lbk'� �1�e �m+euoo Am ai all tnnes. O Inspxt �xh�cln yb equiqnrn� f�equrnUy Fa aM �eyair Ial p�ompUy� Use MD Pens m nlch luks u4IlI RPivS �IC nmEC. ❑ Ckan up spJb or leaks immrduock and diryo¢ of c�iam�p maimeLs p'operlr. 0 00 �i � ao..� .�r.u. ..i,oR n� n..� ,paim Ux dn� cicanrcp melhods (ab�orErnl mer iah W I�tla, aM/a ngs). O SnuD up splkd dry malaiab vnmcdumM. Do rol w w na�h th� msc w�th wa�a, a buv �hem. ❑ c� �,o� oo e�n � n, mas�s w+�w �� diep�o�5 of conromwttd ioil. � Repan �iyufic�� epilla wmW imek. Ya m �equued q� law w�epv[ all ugo�6�ant �eless ar haa'dom ma'ai�la, mcludm` al. To �epon a apill: 1) Di�191 I w vav bcd emerb'�)� R+pon+e �ohu. n GII We Gmemw s OtSee of Emegenev $ervicea W�un f Crnier. Bi� BS?-7s5p Ri hoursl. l:arthwork & Paving/Asphalt Work Co�itaminated SOiIS �4 '('\ H __ j . Lt� , ' - " , _ _ -��- ��,- � �-is ; �� "� ��.. �::�� Emsion Cuntrnl ❑ Sched�de BrW�ng end e.caratao norl Cd M� weatder wly. ❑ Suhiliu al� dmuded uus. mwll W mnwin kmporan av�wn conlmb (mrJi n ao�ian wmol fabcx a boodcd fiEa nwi%) uaol vegelmpn ia �yyy�iµ�. O Seed v v�� .s;emioa fv aosion coMol an sbpes w NiKrc miupk�ion is na immcdalch� P�+Mcd. Scdimen� Cont�ol � Prumct swrm dwin inlns guners, diaMs, �eA dr+�ege caursa wi�h appmpnorc BMPf, a y ai �.�I p�p. Gber rolls. bumittt � Re�e.ot srdimmt fiwn mipating oBLIc by umalling md mainmmiug tWimm� e��s. weh as Gbv mlh. sil� fercn. nr �imeo� bnvns. ❑ Krep e.acavnd eoil on We siR w�hac i� m0 oa wlku mio Ihe �ven. o r�,o.r ��.�e m.�;ai: m a�mp nncks on Ne nte. npl m Ihe tpcel ❑ Cmteowled $oils ❑ lf mq of ihc (ollo��ing w�diUdit aie oGv.ed. WI fa cmmm�urion aod Coutrol 6ovdg�' WaW Qualiro ■ Unmu.l sal conAitio� Amcolontion. m odor � Aba�da¢A �°'dvyo�nd iuh�. ■ Ab�odoncd wt1ls • Borsd barte4. dcMs. a vmh_ ❑ .A�,-oid pi��ing and u.�l �oat�ng in �.ei madrr. a n hen wm iz (atus� bcf fmF ps.��rnl mll lu�t lwe b auc. ❑ Coeer uarm drun mlw md m.nAoks w6en ePP�) m6 seal cwl uck cmi slum .S�I, �0` SU� CIL. ❑ Callea antl rai'cic or approp�ytcl� dispose of e>ccss abrm.e pz.d or aM. Do NO7 s.��cep w msh u mw ewters. O Do nd nse wna w�.ash down frch espn.li conc+ue p�vanc� Santuttin� & A�phaWCmcrtle Rcmory O Cmpinel. cmv or hanicsde soom� Onin iolas w#a m. wmn� Ust fil�v fa6nc. u�ch Msin ivkt filun. a pa�el boBs to keep slmn� w� of the s«m drnin s•zao. � Shmsl. a6owrb. « �vcwm snv-w� d�ur� ad dispme of all was�e o mo�i u yau ert (nishM in orc Iouw� n e� �e mA af eaeh wa4 dar (•fi�che.a u �>. ❑ If aacW slum'rntas a calch hot�a clan i1 up unmedptrJ��. Concretc, (;rout A :�Iortar ,1�i�>lir:i�ion � "� ��' �� 4 E �' , �; =h.��,•,,: � rY —}�! �� ,�-^^�. r M � �.:.€^�'� �C�{m�� S. ; '... , � Jcr �� pellcls and a�c�� I�,im Jnmagc �s. �� matenals m�:i ue��cr reach a nortn dram ❑ W�� ui cd�c+ctc cqwpmcm'Wcls offv¢ a �o a cmmined uo. .o ihcie 's ^o �h+rp� mro �he underh�ing �od armwwrtound�n�a�ess Luwncre�e lurden �nd dnpose of ss gar6age ❑ CMlcu Ihc ��ash Nnn (�nm �.�ashmg e.�poaed aggrc��e �aere�e anE remor� �� fw apqopnam dlsyosol oRv�c Dewatering f • '�'.Py� .�` ,.r .v.._F�} , - , \ �y `.n ❑ Effccii��cl�, n anaEc all n�n.in all N�W(f a�.11lin Ih[ Sil[. 3�M all r W�OI� qui e„�n„$a r�, a,� s�� o�.�� ..k. r m ort:nc �..�. som m m:��e utns a olhem�ise ensurc romplunce. ❑ N'hen de�aicfu�g noiJ a�d ob'a�n appro��al 4dn Ihe local m�miupuL� before disvurging ��ua �o a sam Ewier ors�nrmdn,n Flmmm�rdnxrs,o„ Woupy a Wsiti uK. u sed�mcm vap u. he �eqwred Olnvusofknoxncon�am�n.�on �cw�e u �epwred pnor w m�sc �. d�scha�e of t�d�vsiv. Consuli .�nh Js Eng�nm �o Mem�u�e n�6e`htr Ievmg rs requvW and hm. m imeryrch resul¢ Cmiami�u�ed Sm�md�.a�c muii 6c vca�cd n haukd oR-s�ir f r Dmper duposel 5torm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Painting & Paint Removal :1.. ` / � , �, I . _.y \ r.�„��; . i��p o H�,�« <k,� nN:iK: w.,�u w�� comaim'+s in�o a sucel 6�acr. yorm dnm. «sud�cc waicn O For ��aiubucd ym�s. W�n� w� Mashca lo J�c e.Icnl pois�blc. Rmtt lo Ihc ��+�� unrr ontt rou ha�c gamed penmszmn own ihc �oca� ..�,:m,..k. �nximem �uthoni� Nc.�cr pa,r p.�m donn a 6.ui. ❑ Fw oil-haycd pi�nu. pnn� ai� brvshes io tl.c e�un� poy ibk and ekao x�� n�� r soheni m a pr�cr conulner Fil�u uW rcuu ihimcrs and sol.cnis D�spou uf rts�aue ..d munablc Ih��r.'sol��ems as lu>udous �.esie Paini rrmu�� ❑ Chemiul wmr smpp�ng res�duc and ��, ��d m� r,� ��.� ��: �. pa�ms coma�n�ne kad n�nhu�yl�n mua� bc dupned of.s haiardous �.u�: o r.�„� �e,�..m e.,,i oa.� �o��mars dn so-ipp�op and santl Ekstms n•� De sncpi ��p a calleucd �n ptasiic drop c1oA.a �nd e;spofcA of es �nsh LanAscapc hlatcrials � � � ��n �. ��\ . O Ca.rnn g�pkE lan��p�ng mmcn�ls In nnrms Jcm �ndn wr� ..�Irn �M ne �ci�.cly bcm� used, O Stx.l c�oAihle 6ndsc��e mnenol m palku Co.er er po�� iLeu ma�enals �chcn Ih�.� art nd xm�ek bnng usrd n appLcd ❑ Discow„ue applrc�hon of en� ��bk W„dsoa mm��.�„nM1i� 2 du�. bc�ac, (a1[ciSl �1�n f�Y�l p dYnlls �r[I w�d�� tAM NAIEOCOUNTrNID[ Wazer PotJution �teverrtion Program OqnWaro� MurrAyiwnm.crny Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts. especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) discharges to storm drains. �-'�""�"�IITII must be implemented to prevent prohibited During lnstallafion • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs� o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary s��,�✓er. Contact your local sunitary sev✓er ayency befor� discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. t `�'�' Ji"�'��i.`I�>Jt' �G.l'HN��\ �t�t1rC1,Fy�i'� -!i�'1�.:.:��y��. .�{' ,yy�� +� i�� .� (� 1�7�`�a �_.�^`•+i'�+S�.i3�Ma-Tfi.h't"+^'.-dwrR-c��K'�'s � f�� µ.,� �� s . . ii. r '� . . • . � . y . . S'i��t� . � . ' M1 . - . . t �z�; n ;;.� ti `'.�S � -s�r:��'�� s� �, �� , �. � ;' 7n� , � . 5'� �i:�a�. ` un Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohrbiied discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properfy. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! �� F�� .�� p�' 1 � �^ � a � �'A 4• � ��a+ol•-'s �n If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- � �,,��.�a� ��,� stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing ��.� �.�-�--�'�► -- - 4 copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal '"".� �� ' '� stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. � `s' � `` Phofo credlf: Don Edwards Netione/ WOdlife Sanduery Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.ora (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). F/NAL February 29, 20i2 _ . � ;�,,�;g with copper flashing, gutter and drainprpe. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review and Special Permit for a new, two-story sinqle familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1529 Bernal Avenue, Zoned R-1, Steven Crooks and Helen Miranda, 1529 Bernal Avenue Burlinqame CA 94010, propertv owner, APN: 026-034-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 9, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dav of June, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit 1529 Bernal Avenue Effective June 19, 2014 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 29, 2014 sheets A1.1 through A4.1, L1.0, L2.0 and PW.1; and that the two trees along the rear property line shall be a Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) and a Pittosporum undulatum (Victorian Box) and shall be 24-inch box size when planted, as shown on the Landscape Plan, sheet L1.0, date stamped May 29, 2014; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's March 31, 2014 memo, the Parks Division's April 7, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's March 28, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's May 8, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit 1529 Bernal Avenue Effective June 19, 2014 Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ��1'��y�� CITY OF BURLINGAME �LJ�`�•'� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURur�cF,h�E 501 PRIMROSE ROAD i , � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 l +�p', �.�; . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org '� ,� _ Site: 1529 BERNAL AVENUE The [ity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 9, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall Council (hambers, SOl Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1529 BERNAL AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-034-OSO Mailed: May 30, 2014 (Flease refer to other side) � �i�.�� l'. -.. __.' �- PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlina me A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � . , F _,., �:: � F,,� - ��. A • • - . � - . �Z.. m„ � �. �" s J'� ' �_ , i � y .' +,. I, �. � • �.� �- � ° •� 1 ' .;�� ir , �' �'� �,,. i• ' �� a'�'�`� +/ # �• � . . . � ,. �e�„�.,, �.r � � � S L . � 7 � ri� ! ` -.. �. . „�µ . �ye� ' � 1 . � � i n � � • 3 { � �i'•+. ` ..' � - � • W , 1r �/ ' �� S. � � .� ��' . �S ,�i � . + ., ,� sO ,/ ` � ,�� , * �` ,�. � � �,,� �. � ,�,; :- ` �, � .Z' , , . � . • r.� � �,.��`� r, �' ,• �� i� �� = � � /�r m ..� r a� � � • � �'.:� r � � � �`�'. �� ` �. °��`� y � ' s ~M � "�s_ { :^�� r`,-�.� . ..� ~ ' � �' ��,� �� ✓" �` � °� ' , ^k �! '. �w . '��'� �'` ,/ : y' � � i~ � ��T f'' � � � � � �, '��, � _ � �- .� , • ' , • ,� � r � 4M �:/ � '�1 �,� , � , �� . �.`� �� - � '� ` r ,,�� ' ,� '" '�'�"� � 3 �� : ` ` . ,S sf .�� ' � . _.� � . s# . . f � � ( 75 'y' . �' � ' ��!► r . ��!►_ J *'' • S� . r�.:'.s� '� • �'� !� r: � � � ` � � t,•� �,� _ /� . j � * w �� .. �, �`` �r.� . ��' ''' � r� . ` � , - �c .�:� -, , �;� e. �. � � �� ' • -�� " y y ��N � TM , � � �� 1 a,,o�� ` �' �` �'�* '�ir�� / , �.� ,� �.. . , _, �� , +� �'� . � � � • p . / � '� � �+ . � .. ' � . � / �, � -' �� V } � � , � / � �►. '� ' •�► �_ ,,�, ,� �",. . . � , � � � � /�� , • . ! ' ''� . � � . /�' � � � .. r y � � � \ 1��' . � ,, f�� `� ` �� x , . , � I # � . � i - � � �� Y . �y � •� ��., �1.T � . i� ri�.�F . �,,'��,� ��„ �� , ' ' _;"?: 1\� . � � �� 61, `o� �,' j+, t f�t � � "� ' ` : +,' ? h. f '� y i �,S � - . � ��;� � r�O� I � ..+�, ��. . �� .�� ` � k � ' � � �',1E, ,, � �. / � � • � . � - - Y Y7 ��4 f - ' , � r . �� P �'+,. � , .,��,` �.. � � . ? . ^ . � 4� � �. _ . i . �.5. � �, � .