The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1440 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 1440 Cabrillo Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Item No. Regular Action Meeting Date: September 10, 2012 Request: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Randy Grange, TRG Architects Property Owner: Otto Miller General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-041-130 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single story house with a detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,417 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch and chimney exemptions). The proposed project is 3 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is within 1% of the maximum allowed FAR. The project includes a detached garage (427 SF) which provides finro code-compliant covered parking spaces for the proposed five-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010). 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Au ust 29, 2012 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1sf flr): 19'-4�� ...............................................1..9'-4��...(.block...average�.. ........... (2nd flr): 21'-0" 20'-0" :............................................................................................................................ .... . Side (left): 5'-0" 4'-0" (right): 9'-2" (to 2"d story) 4'-0" Rear (1st flr): 42'-4" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 42'-4" (to deck) 20'-0" � Lot Coverage: 2,339 SF 2,400 SF 39% 40% FAR: 3,417 SF 3,420 SF' 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR ' (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) Design Review 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF # of bedrooms: Parking: Height: DH Envelope: PROPOSED 5 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 27'-7„ complies per CS 25.26.075 b, 3 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Plans date stamped: August 29, 2012 ALLOWED/REQUIRED 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 30'-0" CS 25.26.075 Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator. August 27, 2012, Regular Action Meeting: At the Planning Commission RegularAction meeting on August 27, 2012, the Commission expressed concern with the expediency of the removal of the Coast Live Oak and also had questions and comments concerning the windows, the various roof pitches and the material of the chimney, and voted to continue the item with direction to make design modifications as requested by the Planning Commission and to revise the landscape plan to reflect the recommendations of the City Arborist (August 27, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes attached). The applicant submitted a response letter, dated August 31, 2012, and revised plans date stamped August 29, 2012, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. Please refer to the copy of the August 27, 2012, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2 3 4 5 Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 29, 2012, sheets A1.1 through A4.1, L1.0, L2.0 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning 2 Design Review Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 1440 Cabrillo Avenue 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 10, 2012 memo, the Chief Building Official's June 28, 2012 memo, the Parks Supervisor's June 28, 2012 memo and July 27, 2012 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 25, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's June 26, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting 3 Design Review 1440 Cabrillo Avenue framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, applicant and architect Attachments: Applicant response to Commission's comments, date stamped August 31, 2012 Minutes from the August 27, 2012 Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting E-mail from Parks Supervisor, Bob Disco concerning removal of the 30" Coast Live Oak Tree Letter from neighbors at 1432 Cabrillo Avenue Application to the Planning Commission Photographs of Neighborhood Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 31, 2012 Aerial Photo n - Arr6�itert.r August 31, 2012 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 1440 Cabrillo Ave. Dear Commissioner, You previously reviewed the proposed residence for 1440 Ave. on August 27th. Some suggestions were made about potential revisions. We revised the plans to address those suggestions. The shingled chimney has been changed to a brick chimney. We enlarged the depth of the exposed rafter tails so that they become a more prominent feature and added an eave detail. We reduced the visibility and impact fireplace enclosure at the family room by shortening and downsizing it. We specified that the windows are to be "simulated true divided lite". And the new oak trees were changed from 24" box to 48" box with the species being changed to Scarlet Oak. Thanks for taking the time to review this project, and we hope you like the proposed i•evisions. Sincerely, Randy Grange AIA _ _ �� . :,. , ,. , ;;' � � �Ula � � �� ? C��Y ��?f= . :_J�:,�1�.1'•SC��I�E G€.'L`'t�',...�Yr�'.I,''��, :�N;! necyded � ?U� Parl: Rund, Suire 203, I�w�lingumc, CA 9/(Illl .%� ... La rsc ^a„�..,_..,,.�� ' 65057`)S7G2 Fnx G50.57').01 IS www.n'garch.com CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minuies Augusf 27, 2012 5. 1440 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A DETACHED GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; OTTO MILLER, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated August 27, 2012, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Seventeen (17) conditions were suggested for consideration. Questions of staff: None. Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Randy Grange, 205 Park Road; represented the applicant. Have received a tree removal permit — the existing tree is not healthy and is even too close to the existing home, which would have likely required its removal. Commission comments: ■ Handsome design. ■ Clarify that the windows will be simulated, true divided-light windows. (Grange — will install such windows.) ■ Requested that the City ArborisYs recommendation regarding the amendment to the landscape plan be addressed in the project's landscape plan. ■ Provide a greater detail regarding the rafter tails — would like to see more of them (Grange — agreed.) ■ With respect to the various roof pitches; will this look unusual? Would have preferred all roof portions to be the same pitch, perhaps eliminating the flat roof portion. ■ Could also revise the chimney to look less like a water heater enclosure — perhaps make it a different material (e.g. brick base) to add some richness to the design. (Grange — can review the finishing of this element.) Also look at the second chimney that looks out of proportion. ■ Spoke to City Arborist; he feels that the developer prematurely removed the tree — he agreed that the tree should have ultimately been removed. Feels a bit insulted by the action of the developer to remove the tree before the project is approved. (Grange — showed proof of the signed permit. Meeker — noted that a permit was issued for tree removal because it is located within the footprint of the building — no notification required under these circumstances. Is implied in the permit approval that the tree is not removed unless the project is approved. Unusual circumstances exist in that the actual permit did not state that the tree should not be removed in advance of project approval.) ■ Indicated that there is typically public notification in advance of a tree-removal permit — however, there is an expectation that tree removal related to a new project will be noticed as part of the design review notification process in order to reduce redundancy. Should be assumed that the tree wouldn't be removed until following project approval. ■ As a City of trees, the noticing process needs to be complied with, even if it is associated with the design review process. ■ Noted that due to the condition of the tree, it could have been removed subject to the normal tree removal process, regardless of the project. ■ Doesn't see the need for expediency in removing the tree in this instance. 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes August 27, 2012 If there is a structural safety issue, the City Arborist would waive noticing requirements under this type of circumstance. (Guinan — clarified that the code states that the Parks and Recreation Director shall approve a tree removal permit in the event that a tree exists within the footprint of a new project; there is no formal notification process required. Noted that the code may need to be revised to reflect what is desired by the Commission.) Agrees that the shingled chimney results in too much of that texture on the building — some form of material differentiation is desirable. Also explore the design of the other chimney that appears that it is "hacked off'. Public comments: Eugene Podkaminer, 1432 Cabrillo Avenue; spoke: ■ Incredibly frustrated by the fact that the tree has been removed. ■ Spoke to staff to learn how to address the issue — chose to submit a letter early; the tree was removed prematurely. ■ There is something fundamentally wrong with the process regarding the tree removal. ■ This isn't just — trees are public goods and are seen from many places; the removal impacts a lot of people. ■ Noted that staff indicated that situations like this have not happened before. ■ Need to strengthen how the procedure is administered; better coordination with the Parks and Recreation Department. ■ Approval of the plan should be contingent upon the recommendation of the City's Arborist. Additional Commission comments: Would like to see changes to the finishing of the chimneys and other matters There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Terrones moved to continue the matter with direction to make design modifications as requested by the Planning Commission and to revise the landscape plan to reflect the recommendations of the City's Arborist. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi. Discussion of motion: Likes the project. Rework the landscape plan consistent with the City ArborisYs recommendations. Make modifications as requested by the Commission. Chair Gaul called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 4-0-1-1(Commissioner Yie absent, Commissioner Sargent). The Commission's action is not appealable. Commissioner Sargent refurned to the dais. 11 Received After E3URLINGAMF PC Meeting 08.27.12 � Agenda Item #5 GD/PLG-Strohmeier, Erica �� 1440 Cabrillo Ave. (pg.1 of 1) � From: PARKS-Disco, Bob Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 12:02 PM To: CD/PLG-Strohmeier, Erica Subject: 1440 Cabrillo Oak Tree Erica, Based on the fact that the Coast Live Oak tree at 1440 Cabrillo was removed prior to design review, I am recommending the Planning Commission consider revising the current plant list to eliminate the two 24" Tristaniopsis laurina and replace them with either one or two 48" Acer rubrum (Red Maple), Plantanus acerifolia `columbia' (sycamore), or Quercus coccinea (Scarlet Oak). These fast growing trees will grow 40-60 feet in height and will be much more substantial species than the proposed slow growing Tristaniaopsis which only reach a height of 15- 20 feet. Please let me know if you have any questions, :.. COMMUNI CATION RECEI vED AFTER PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT Bob Disco Park Supervisor/City Arborist City of Burlingame 650.558.7334 ��t,�,�*.' � � I� r jh�� rd.� �� AUG 2'� 201Z .� CIT°( OF Bi1RL1NGAME � CDD-�'L/aN�9��1C; DiV. ;� �__,_ CCJMMUNIGATION RECEIYIsD ,,dFTER PRL•"PARATIOX OF STAFF REPORT Received After PC Meeting: 08.27.12 Agenda Item #5 - 1440 Cabrillo Ave. August 23, 2012 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 850 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Commissioners, Erica Carmel Eugene Podkaminer 1432 Cabrillo Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 .,�� a�� . '�.� �. �,� ��a`��L�',_ �F u�Ud�L![V� ;q��7E i I �I,'�f..��f`�,.��C 7p\�. We respectfully request that the Commission prevent the removal of the mature oak tree at 1440 Cabrillo that is currently planned to be cut down as part of the Otto Miller's construction and landscape plan. Our house is one lot over from 1440 Cabrillo and we have a view of this beautiful tree from our backyard and bedroom. Old and handsome trees like this one provide beauty, shade, and privacy, and raise home values by maintaining the feel of an older, more established, community. We understand that Burlingame has a history of protecting our trees for all of these reasons. There are many precedents which required developers to build around trees rather than remove them. This tree is one of four mature trees that are visible from our backyard. The first, a large and beautiful cedar tree, was cut down last month by Larry Morsello as part of his development project next door at 1436 Cabrillo. In addition, two century-old redwood trees behind our house at 1433 Cortez were granted permits for removal by the Beautification Committee in June (these permits are now under appeal to the City Council). Please don't approve the removal of this beautiful tree. Sincerely, � i Erica Carmel Eugene Podkaminer �cr BURLINGAM�E :. -.. . � . ...:..:� �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: �l Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit � Parcel #: � 2 �e • � `�" � • L 3O ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: / ��v /Cl' `��'/�l (� �� Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person �( PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents� OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ,� - � 1'�2� Name: ��T L� ��L t ��i � Address: � /'a ��L �� • �� Address: � � 1.�� / �� City/State/Zip: r �vlU City/State/Zip: ��` tJ✓�I�Q �, �� %7 ��l Phone: �(� " ~ � � Z Phone: U Jd '� r � `�� 7i Fax: � �� " cv � °l ' ��l � , E-mail: Gt S �' f'G�f - li ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ectcontactPerso OK to send electronic copies of documents Name r Fax: E-mail: � I�Z3 i/( � lo � �Cl.Y�GI. Address: �_� �J ��G1N' C� �-Oi • � 2 � 3 City/State/Zip. �U✓�11��i �h�-e. . ( ��'7 ��G�J Phone: b J�� T�' ��'% Z Fax: � �J d ' � -7 G'l - � 1 �,r7 E-mail: C��s e * Burlingame Business License PROJECT DESCRIPTION: � �iC/� ��n�'.SCa � lYSc�� Me� :�:, ' x -=�y ; ��„ �� ,. ; -- t-. ;i�)r.yN(v! = . . . t�'.f. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I best of my knowledge and bel Applicant's signature: I am aware of the propo Commission. Property owner's sig a certify under penaJty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the Date: b • � % ' � �" and the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Date: � � � I I � �ate submitted: * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S:�Handouts�PC Application 20o8-B.handout �S� � F-1 �� S� �� 5� ��a �� . �.� �,-- _ �� M'� ��--� -�o � �- n c? � Z �l-� ,r� l 5� �2_ 1,z - -� r-� ,1 �..� ' J � � � ti�1�,-� �-� �`�"�"�� ''"�� . o s so' o s' zs' o� �i o , s' o o s e z' a a ' iF TMiS 9�EFi i5 NOT 36".2a' . �� i5 IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�,,,,,,LI I I I I I I I I I I.,, I, , I I I I I I I I,.,, I,, I I I I I I. , I I I I I � � A RED��D PaINi - X.LE AC�RaNGIT ceaaric scn�s: ��s' = r-o' ��e' = r-o' ,�<- - r-o' ��z' = i'-o' 3/a' = Y-o' r= r-o' �-�/z' = r-o' s= r-o' Arcbrttrt.r 1 4 4 0 C A B R I L L O A V E ZOSParARoa4Suiie203 Burlingame. CaliComia 94010 � FAk 650579.01IS 65057957fi2 E-Mail: adminC'rcgazch.mm B U R L I N G A M E, C A ArchituC ��5� �acwr � rxu+oa»�� cau+c� + �_n,>, • q os ion3 �s FOF�AU� Y" _.�'L�: "'_'�.= ywi S ' py"0 H: � 3v. III � ( i.:' I � �.c �` L �" � � �e • y e . . t�t�� . � �`�- ,� �s �JI 1 .s...s� , f "9Ai�°.�i� . _.... _ ir��. I �'� s a�� i,7 "'� � ,� .�.i Coasultant(5). � IV 9 . • 1448 Cabrillo 1444 Cabrillo 1440 Cabrillo (SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1436 Cabrillo 1432 Cabrillo Project Title: HEW RESIDENCE New House APN: 026-041-130 1440 Cabrillo Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Owoer(s): Otto Miller Sheei Conteuts: NEIGHBORHOOD FRONT ELEVATIONS NO SCALE NEIGNBOR PNOTOS �.k .��o�o �o� Dr: ro �� Dne. �6� �2 mur. PWanSS.bmiv.l 0.EViSIONS LEFT SIDE YARD RIGHT SIDE YARD SIDE YARDS AS SEEN FROM STREET NO SCAIE � LOCATION MAP ti 1 i � NO SCALE s�.�a A 1.0 a s.� Project Comments Date: To: From: June 25, 2012 d Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 ❑ Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 ❑ Building Division (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff ❑ Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, finro story single family dwelling with detached garage at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-130 Staff Review: June 25, 2012 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding possible relocation of sidewalk area around trees in the planter strip. Reviewed by: V V Date: 7/10/2012 / � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS `�1 '�v " 5�' Project Name: �U��I,fE ��iyt,'I�[.� � Project Address: l �� The following requirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 41M^�� ,l¢'� 'jv � ��yl►c.l�n �i% �� c�i+�i? v�c� S�t2✓�tZ, . 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be s own on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 ��'"�anitary sewer lateral is�required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump sta.tions and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a tr�c impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the proj ect to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc r � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject paxcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 �_ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Pernut and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 �_ The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the proj ect is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle sha11 be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMNIENTS.doc � ,�;�� _ ... »�a.-,�- ,.,s�., _ _ �a � � • • S Date: �� June 25, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two story single family dwelling with detached garage at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-130 Staff Review: June 25, 2012 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) With your re-submittal provide documentation (GreenPoints checklist, LEED checklist, or other , as described below, which shows that this project will comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance. Note: Compliance with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance is required unless specific land use provisions for the project are approved by the Planning Commission prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010. "A permit applicant is required to submit a completed checklist of the proposed compliance measures for the project at the initial submittal to the Planning Division for projects requiring Planning Commission approval. If Planning Commission approval is not required prior to Building Code plan check, then an applicant must submit a completed checklist of the proposed compliance measures directly to the Building Division at the time of the initial Building Code plan check submittal. A GreenPoint Rated checklist, or equivalent, with a minimum of fifty (50) points shall be accepted as one method of ineeting compliance with this ordinance. Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to meet with City staff prior to any application submittal to review the green building program and details to achieve compliance with this ordinance. The means by which compliance measures are achieved shall be by Build It Green "GreenPoints", LEEDO, Energy Efficiency Standards, other recognized point systems, or equivalent approved methods. LEED� projects must verify that they exceed the 2008 Energy Efficiency Standards by 15% (Title 24, Part 6.) Compliance measures shall be approved by the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of a building permit. Projects must show verification of energy savings which exceed the 2008 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) of the California Building Code by 15%. Projects using the performance approach may use an Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) approved by the California Energy Commission to show verification of the required energy savings of 15% by comparison of the proposed building to the Title 24 standard or "budgeY' building." Green Building information can be found on the City of Burlingame website in the Green Building tab of the Building Division page at: httq://www.burlingame.org/Index.aspx?paqe=1203 3) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale. 4) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 5) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 6) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 8) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 9) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 10) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 11) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 12) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 13) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 14) Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602) 15) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawinqs. 16) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 17) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 18) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 19) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 20) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 2010 CBC §2113. __ .. _ . _ ��`_ . Reviewed b�"�� ' Date: 6-28-2012 Ci� Project Comments Date: To: From June 25, 2012 Engineering Division (6�v) �:�S-i230 ~ Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (6501 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (v"sOj g�3-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney 1650) 558- 7204 Subject: Request for Desi�n Review for a new, two story single family dwellin� with detached garage at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-130 Staff Review: June 25, 2012 �.;' Site plan needs to include existing trees on property and indicate if any trees are to be removed. 2. No tree over 48" in circumference measured 54" from ground may be removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) (d 3'; Landscape plan required, and must include three (3) landscape trees, either L-- exisiing or new. 4; Landscape plan is required to meet `Water Conservation in Landscape � R e ul a ti on s" a tt a ch e d . Irri a ti on Pl an re uired f or B uildin ermit. Audit due 9 i } 9 q 9p for Final. , v✓A�►z ��u's�eR-v ��s�s't- �ivv � �u�, �'/�v 0� � � D t3Y�'!�/��'�%Z�� Wv�LK �l1��c/ « ��wc {�f�.(cS .�lV. ��- /�iLta vr�c— 6� 3�J "�� g�� 3�" r��'r'� Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 6/28/1!/ 2� 7/i //�- OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIERICY CHECKLIST • :• o o - -e � oo , , I certi �,. ;" bJect proJect ts the speciflpd requirements of the Water Con ervation in landscaping Ordinance. � G l2 gnature Date '�3' e'� Si F,�: �r;C(,.y� ;i�s}aa•r`:P:1' '��.Jir:A^'ls�r��1 7C �.�^r.Y: Y;t;.•- t'.S' ti:\:"i{: .:-A:,I;..cY�+:..'��; .'v. ��• { '� �: � � i '� l. ��.�!'• 4l� . 1 1 �r ./;:�')t �:' � 'n''." �:: • ""' � 4 �i 0 1 ,�r r-. �"%;-C;f��'•".:�r,'��/':y � � :?� r .'S ]S};1teK:��i'�57f + �r•�u•.•�i.��: J„�, • : r:i� L ��t:��:,t�.,.:n�•.::��, ��-�� _�' .�.,.:��.�•r _ �.. ` -.:��'�'i;',''•.:ir_ Rrt,a...,,_,N.,_ ... t� .� t �. .ti :i� ,:;:: ;.fy �:.µlit'. .�'•_ .�� ,� ;y:. .c;.•=��.- •.ti: :r,-: .i •.i':.�.�.�-�Jn. .1: L'b7�� .-ii-: :,7,�' :l. .y. �.z:.�:i:.. 1��: :it"� ;i.n� Single Famlly ❑ Muld-Fam11y O Commercial ❑ Instltutfo ai O Irrigation only O Industrial ❑ Other: iApplicant Name (print): Contact Phone tt: . 2• � `Project Site Address: Q �{ � ;Agenc}('.p¢yiew • _.r;:�,. =,.. zt;•:t; � : - I Project Area (sq.ft. or aue): of UniCs: q of Meters: � ::'(Pass]� :�,•'.(Fa11).: �.,-. �, =ti:. �, . _ .. . -- 1�.�:1•'_��; �'��i�� ,� ��': �'rej�):: Tot landsca e Area s h. 'iF�1 t c r c,� 01;� "� '; ��e:��f�`-'•';�: "�� p;�:;.=: �� r � {�.,�.,� � • P � �i• �= .-.' ,�' ai.r��1;�+ }� �� t a�Z�Ce.� r � i� t', a i i • :�;� i �. �.� �y� �t� C � . •. . � � , � � , i!�� 1 4" ��J/i f� i :1� � �l i'.!� P C . - r -�C;�:+.., !� 7��;.��' ,� � t s„ � _t,r.t��.at . 3� 1) �:t:��l �t , A , „ , '�4;j;�.,,:�j.��.f'�,�'r��tjy�t�Y.l�l�L�,� Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): ;B: `. _ . �]. ` �..r.��,-- �. t. ;;'�l�j1%-i��-'t,��j�1"•j��t�i?:C`��'r: �:: _'. , . ..`..-..: . , �.�.=•�w �:: � -, �: t',.. ,� �'4;� Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.l: �`�;'8�°`�.'v':-..,�1=;1:;. ;Ui!�li�c�j�, .��3r,��f � .1:`�:�7 , . ., ��.�i�_io f�r��i��T Special landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): � a, (9'r �O'��.' �; � . �`'� ��y'� '�°'� Y':"�� i�. ` Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): ;j ` '` %' < .1��"l�iiA2..� rlY..:'v..� �! ..! t ..{t,�.�trSyT�.�•k,� ��- r.r _ '� � •+' 't , c�:4�:t. !ii':. :i': :ti�•'� r T'.'..:; i,'.t'.:r:� �i' ''�i--.:'.' - 'i'::: � 'i" :1 ,5'a,' •:1 � i. �• �, `j' ��:�.:. ! � 1' i~ �.•t � c}i'��:1' i�iji �• �;;';'�:i .,: ;:;y�:;I;:�:: ..�--��:�� . - .��.�.�?t ��.i�,...��:�:.�:.;:> ��: .�. �� .�_ri��.. �.�;;�::��i�.a.... ;... .,. Turf Less than 25% of the landscape area,ls Yes �'°' C-1`;�-: ;0; turf p ':-:.�. ,;;:�;�:--'";. No,SeeWaterDudget ��l�;�s'.� ;:.i;�?;�^,�•,� All turf areas are > 8 feet wlde es ;:',;0;; `;;;_�,' :;:0,:: '�'' All turf Is planted on slopes < 25% es �:�-;��=':p. �":� Non Turf At least 8096 of non-turf area is native es ''�::"�3"�';':,;�:;�� 0.:��; :�� or low water use plants O No, See Water Budget ''��` =��'�'�•' �`�' ��`'=��; �. �.T�..�-�;_.,,�� -;,�•�:,:... Hydrotones Plants are grouped by Hydrozones es -'::�;�;.� t;;•C�;;,.::: Mulch At least 2-Inches of mutch on exposed Yes •'•'?�0':`�,.;,::;Di.;;; soil surFaces ;�'�:* �� `: - �`�;`� `., _ �,: IR(�atlon System Efflclency 70% ETo (100g6 ETo for SIAs) Yes :;::��°;rti's:,?:A;;,`:. No overspray or runoff es �;;'$">:i� �'';; 0;�: j;. Irrlgation System Deslgn System efficlency > 70°6 es �� :•.�';::� s;`=:;0 ;;;_; Automatic, self-adjusting irrigation �Ido, not requ;red for Tier i �� `., :,,';".�::;::�Li;:�::� '��: ..1.;..,.. , . :;;-'; -- � •..��: controllers O Yes •�.•�;�: :" . �,_, Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs es '.'•,%�Et= :;�;�;'.��; ;0 �;;;•; No sprayheads in < 8-ft wlde area es '.;'�',`'� `":`'��]', �'�; .�.-.,. lrrlgationTlme 5ystem only operates between 8 PM Yes •`�:+�'•�`;=`;":;0=�•°'. and 10 AM � :�:� ~.�'�� Metertng Separate irrfgation mgter o, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. :� �0�:'^`? :�D;�� =• O Yes ;;�.�' ;'i: �'�., Swlmming Pools / Spas Cover highly recommended O Yes >': �'�': ;0.:' �'�; No, not required - � "��-= . ;.; �. Wate�FeaWres Reclrculating ❑ Yes ':%t�� ti.� �;G;, Less than 3096 of landscape area Yes �:Y�C� ;:i�':t�:";D�P.:;: -.:�u;,:.=� :., �:: Documentatlon Checkltst Yes - �i _ ;?•: .F.-:.;;,;• , ...: �. Landscape and Irrigation Design Alan O Prepared by appllcant �`.'.%$�•::r;:;:; C�'.;�; �.Prepared by proiessional .�'�� :�:;� = c�� .��'•: Water Budget (o tlonal ❑ Prepared by applicant •-'O; ;��'=r'• �� '� i;'= .••t,.•,,;•: - 0 Prepared by proFessianal �::�;,: �;i::::�";'�:,:,'' . Audtt Post-lnstallatfon audit completed �Completed by applicant -�'"��'��.0��'' C1 Completed by professional , . ; . , Project Comments Date: To: From: June 25, 2012 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 X❑ Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two story single family dwelling with detached garage at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-130 Staff Review: June 25, 2012 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: �� Date: Z,r��c_jZ Project Comments Date: To: From: June 25, 2012 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review for a new, two story single family dwelling with detached garage at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-130 Staff Review: June 25, 2012 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction (including demolition). When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention BMPs as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at http://www.flowstobay. org/bs_construction. ph p (Scroll about half-way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 <� Reviewed bv: SD -� Date: 6/26/12 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a new, two-story sinqle familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1440 Cabrillo Avenue zoned R-1 Otto Miller, P.O. Box 121, Burlinqame, CA, 94011, propertv owner, APN: 026-041-130; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 10, 2012, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th dav of September, 2012 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Effective September 20, 2012 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 29, 2012, sheets A1.1 through A4.1, L1.0, L2.0 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 10, 2012 memo, the Chief Building Official's June 28, 2012 memo, the Parks Supervisor's June 28, 2012 memo and July 27, 2012 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 25, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's June 26, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1440 Cabrillo Avenue Effective September 20, 2012 sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD q� ; BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '�� , _'- PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org = _ Site: 1440 CABRILLO AVENUE ;•; r 1 � .r �a'� . �� The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the PUBLIC HEARING following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, NOTICE 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage at 1440 CABRILLO AVENUE zoned R-l. (/tem continued from the August 27, 2012 P/anning Commission MeetingJ APN 026-041-130 Mailed: August 31, 2012 (Please refer to ofher srdeJ Citv of Burlinpame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Devefopment Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)