The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1416 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff Report� B{UR LI ftiGA ME i i ; DATE TO FROM CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM August 16, 2011 Planning Commission Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: August 22, 2011 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 1416 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage was approved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 2011, for a new, two-story single family dwelling and attached garage at 1416 Cabrillo Avenue (June 13, 2011, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit has not yet been issued. The application was approved with a condition of approval that requires any changes to windows, skylights or sun tubes in bathrooms 2 and 3 be brought back for review as an FYI. This application for FYI includes changes to bathrooms 1, 2 and 3, as well as the landscaping within the rear yard. Please refer to the applicant's explanation letter and originally approved and proposed plans, date stamped August 9, 2011, for a detailed description of the proposed changes. Planning staff would note that the change to bathroom 2, which includes extending the shed dormer, does not increase the floor area ratio since the height in this new area is less than 5'-0" in height. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Letter from applicant, date stamped August 9, 2011 June 13, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes Previously approved and proposed plans, date stamped August 9, 2011 e . . . . .�\�`�. �.. . .. w_ v. �� <f"<* - ]F��/1L + �I�I]E 3841 24'h Street, #A 12098 Hwy. 42 San Francisco, Calif. 94114 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 �� P + a� s).819.0304 � � �'� � � E + tim@formonedesign.com �� '' � 4= � �0?1 J�= o'�!RC.E��';A.fv1� ��'��'��, '��i ��;:��_' i';.'^�,f�!Nli`,1G I:�I`�/ To: Mr. Hurin & Planning Commission From: Tim Raduenz Subject:1416 Cabrillo Ave. Date Sent: 08-09-11 Number of Pages: 1 Fax: Message: Conditions of a�proval #2: (Letter dated June 24, 2011) 1. Added an awning style window to bathroom #2, including a small roof extension over that area, no square footage was added, see revised second floor plan and roof plan. 2. Added a 24x24 Velux skylight to bathroom #3 as shown on revised second floor plan and roof plan. 3. Added an awning style window to bathroom #1 at the first floor, we reconfigured the bathroom to design a operable window, see shown on revised floor first floor plan and elevation. Others: The Owners would like to rearrange the BBQ area from the approved drawings of June 13. We will now divide the back yard in the longitudinal direction of the lot. Please see the new arrangement. I believe this will give the Owners a bigger sense of space, as we push the seating area more into Mike Callan's Landscape, instead of being near the house as it was originally designed. Thanks, � �. . � � Build It GREEN�V Tim Raduenz — c�BP MEMBER �O�M + ON� • Design & Planning • 3841 24`h Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • a�s) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minufes June 13, 2011 6. 1416 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (LINDA AND LARRY DUGONI, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND TIM RADUENZ. FORM + ONE. DESIGNERI STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated June 13, 2011, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were suggested for consideration. Questions of staff: Are solar panels considered mechanical equipment? (Hurin — no, are only subject to height restrictions, not an issue since they would be flush-mounted to roof.) Chair Yie opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz, 3841 24`h Street, San Francisco; represented the applicant. Addressed the Commission's comments from the previous meeting, maintained the Craftsman design. Commission comments: ■ Improved the massing considerably. ■ The balcony off of bedroom 2; looking at the side elevation, the sidewalls do not appear on the side elevation. (Raduenz — this is an error that will be corrected.) ■ Left side elevation; what is it that has a radius? (Raduenz — a trim piece that corresponds with the front details.) ■ Asked if there is a railing befinreen the side windows on the second floor? (Raduenz — only a pony wall.) ■ Would like to suggest placing the solar panels on the flat roof. (Raduenz—would actually preferthis as well, but must still consult with the solar contractor.) ■ In bathroom 3 and the laundry room, there are no windows, but there is a window looking into attic space; what will be behind the window? (Raduenz — will blackout the windows. Would need to change the pitch to the roof to accommodate a window into the bathroom.) Having no window in the bathroom is a bit disconcerting. ■ Discussion regarding attic space and relocation of bathroom and laundry room. Public comments: Pat Giorni, 1441 Balboa Avenue; spoke: Suggested installing a sun tube to provide light into the bathroom. Additional Commission comments: Would prefer a skylight into the bathroom, or some otherway of re-configuring the front and making the floor area work to provide a window for the bathroom. (Raduenz — can add a skylight to bathroom 2, revise the bedroom accordingly.) Can make revisions and bring them back as an FYI. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. �7 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 13, 2011 Commissioner Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 2, sheets T1.0, GN, GP, SP, AB2, A1.0 through A4.0, L1.0 and L2.0; 2. that any changes to windows, skylights or sun tubes in bathrooms 2 and 3 shall be brought back for review as an FYI; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 15 and March 14, 2011 memos, the City Engineer's March 15, 2011 memo, the Fire Marshal's March 15, 2011 memo, the Park Supervisor's April 19 and March 21, 2011 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's March 14, 2011 memo shall be met; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 13, 2011 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Yie called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Lindstrom absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:27 p.m. 11