HomeMy WebLinkAbout1235 Cabrillo Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame
Design Review and Special Permit
Address: 1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Item No. 8b
Regular Action Item
Meeting Date: June 12, 2023
Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for second story balcony for a second story
addition to an existing single-unit dwelling.
Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form One
Property Owner: Daniel Griffin
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 026-171-350
Lot Area: 6,000 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that
additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in
an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that contains an existing two-story single-unit
dwelling and an attached garage. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing second story at the front
of the house with a shed dormer to convert existing attic storage areas to living spaces with appropriate ceiling
heights.
The existing house is nonconforming in floor area (3,286 SF, 0.55 FAR existing where 3,020 SF, 0.50 FAR is
the maximum allowed). With this application, the project proposes a total floor area of 3,269 SF (0.54 FAR).
Because there is no increase in the existing nonconforming floor area, a Variance is not required (includes
front porch and JADU exemptions).
A Special Permit is being requested for a 69 SF second story balcony at the front of the house (Special Permit
required for any second story balcony; 75 SF inaximum allowed). The proposed balcony is designed so that
it extends over and incorporated into the roof of the existing attached garage.
There would be no increase in the number of bedrooms (four existing; expanded spaces do not qualify as
bedrooms since they are a part of existing bedrooms). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered,
are required for a four-bedroom house. The existing attached garage provides two covered parking spaces
(21'-0" x 26'-6" clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered space (9' x 18') is provided in the driveway. All
other Zoning Code requirements have been met.
Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit
This project includes a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) (418 SF) located within the main dwelling. No
on-site parking is required for the JADU. Review of the JADU application is administrative only and is not
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff has determined that the JADU complies with the ADU
regulations.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.68.020(C)(1)(b));
and
■ Special Permit for second floor balcony (69 SF proposed where up to 75 SF is allowed with a Special
Permit) (C.S. 25.10.030 and 25.78.020(A)(7)).
Design Review and Special Permit 1235 Cabrillo Avenue
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Ma 31, 2023
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
Front (15f flr): 20'-0" no change 15'-0" or block average
�2nd flr): 57'-7" 47'-0" 20'-0„
Side (left): 4'-0" no change 4'-0"
(right): 5'-0" no change 4'-0"
Rear (15t f/r): 30'-0" no change 15'-0"
�2nd fli�: 35'-0" no change 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 2,289 SF 1,871 SF 2,400 SF
38.2% 31.1 % 40%
, .......................................................................................................................................
FAR: 3,286 SF *' 3,269 SF * 3,020 SF 2
0.55 FAR 0.54 FAR 0.50 FAR
� .. ..
_. ....
# of bedrooms: 4 no change ---
: ... _.
Off-Street Parking: 2 covered no change 1 covered
(21'-0" x 26'-6" clear (10' x 18' clear interior)
interior) 1 uncovered
1 uncovered (9' x 18')
(9' x 18')
Building Height: 24'-10'/z" no change 30'-0"
_:... _
Plate Height
(1St flr): $'-�" no change 9'-0"
�2nd f��.�: 8'-1" No change 8'-0"
DH Envelope: does not comply — complies C.S. 25.10.055(A)(1)
existing nonconforming ;
_....
Second Floor Balcony: n/a 69 SF 3
(12'-0" right side 75 SF
setback) ($ -0 side setbacks)
* JADU is exempt from lot coverage and floor area ratio.
' Existing nonconforming floor area.
2 (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF = 3,020 SF (0.50 FAR)
3 Special Permit required for a second floor balcony (69 SF second floor balcony proposed where 75 SF
is the maximum allowed).
-2-
Design Review and Special Permit
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: aluminum clad wood with simulated divided lights and wood trim
• Doors: wood entry door
• Siding: combination stucco, wood and brick veneer
• Roof: composition shingle
• Other: wood roof eave brackets and wood porch posts
Staff Comments: None.
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on May 22,
2023, the Commission had a few comments and suggestions for the applicant to consider and voted to place
this item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Division (see attached May 22, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes).
The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans, date stamped May 31, 2023, to address the
Planning Commission's comments and suggestions. Please refer to the applicanYs response letter (attached)
for a detailed response.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by
the City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures;
5. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing
structure as remodeled.
Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall
be supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such
determination, the following findings shall be made:
The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of
Title 25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most
specifically, the standards established in the Design Review Criteria above, as applicable.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.
Suggested Findings for Design Review:
The proposed second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling is consistent with the General
Plan designation of Low Density Residential and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of Title
25, with the exception of the second story balcony for which a Special Permit is being requested; that
the addition is sensitive to the architectural style of the existing house; and that the addition has been
-3-
Design Review and Special Permit
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
designed to include elements of the existing architectural style to help integrate the addition into the
existing structure, including aluminum clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites with wood
trim, horizontal wood siding, and asphalt shingle roofing.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development as shown on the proposed plans.
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property because the
project complies with setback, lot coverage, floor area ratio, declining height envelope, and building
height requirements.
For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's design
review criteria.
Required Findings for a Special Permit: Any decision to approve a Special Permit application in the R-1
zoning district pursuant to Chapter 25.78 shall be supported by written findings. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition
are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the well-defined character of the street and
neighborhood;
2. The variety of roof line, fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed new structure
or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street, and neighborhood;
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City; and
4. Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the City's reforestation requirements, and that the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is consistent with established City policies and practices.
Suggested Findings for a Special Permit (Second Floor Balcony):
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the proposed second floor balcony
are consistent with the existing dwelling, that the 69 SF second story balcony is within the maximum
balcony size allowed (75 SF) and is setback from the side property lines as required (12'-0" proposed
right side setback where 8'-0" is the minimum required), and that the balcony is integrated into the
existing garage roof.
2. The variety of fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed second floor balcony
are consistent with the existing structure and will be screened by the existing garage roof.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City in that
the proposed structure is compatible with the requirements of the City's design review criteria as noted
above.
For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's Special
Permit criteria.
-4-
Design Review and Special Permit
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the
application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should
include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution
of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public
hearing the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
May 31, 2023, sheets T1.0, GN, CG, SW, FAR, and A1.0 through A9.0;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height
or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall
not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with
all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall
be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in
effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS
PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project
architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that
demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property;
11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window
locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting
-5-
Design Review and Special Permit
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final
framing inspection shall be scheduled; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the
approved Planning and Building plans.
Ruben Hurin
Planning Manager
c. Tim Raduenz, Form One, applicant and designer
Daniel Griffin, property owner
Attachments:
May 22, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Applicant Response Letter, dated May 31, 2023
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Application
Letter submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Hans Geiger, date stamped April 20, 2023
Email submitted by Eric Zankman and Pamela Kaufmann, dated April 26, 2023
Planning Commission Resolution (proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 2, 2023
Area Map
�
� CITY 0
�r;�i �
�i 4
'.as�i',-,..i' 1 ��
9n
City of Burlingame
Meeting Minutes
Planning Commission
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Monday, May 22, 2023 7:00 PM Council Chambers/Online
a. 1235 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for
second story balcony for a second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. (Form
One, applicant and designer; Daniel Griffin, property owner) (61 noticed) Staff Contact:
Ruben Hurin
All Commissioners have visited the project site. Communify Development Director Gardiner provided an
overview of the staff report.
Chair Pfaff opened fhe public hearing.
Tim Raduenz, designer, represented the applicant and answered questions regarding the application.
Public Comments:
> Public comment sent via email by Gene Bordegaray: At the Burlingame Planning Commission
meeting on May 22, 2023, an application for design review and special permit will be discussed for the
subject property. My comments are minimal.• 1. The design of the new front facade is well done and
improves the architectural aesthetics of the structure. 2. The conversion of the existing lower-level
bedroom to a JADU would isolate what appears to be the only bathroom on the lower level. My concern
here is pure/y a practical issue. Guests would have to either enter the JADU or go upstairs to a bathroom .
The half-bath accessib/e from the rear yard is a little impractica/ for guest use. The provision of a"GuesY'
bathroom is not a code requirement but might be beneficia/ for home value. (Raduenz: Just to clarify,
there is a powder room underneath the stairs.)
Chair Pfaff closed the public hearing.
Commission Discussion/Direction:
> �ndow details do not match the e/evations. P/ease revise to show the design intent.
> The proposed /eft e/evation shows stucco finish but the rendering shows siding. P/ease clarify which
material will be used.
> This is a nice/y designed proposal to create extra spaces from dead living space. Details were nice/y
hand/ed and worked well with fhe existing home.
> 1 have no problems with the rear and the front. It is well contained and will not impact the neighbors.
Needs clarification if the property owner is intending to update fhe garage door. Because this is the main
front of the house, it can be an opportunity to p�opose some nice architectural details on the garage door.
> Overall, l like the p�oject. However the cut out above the garage for the deck is a litt/e troubling. As a
contractor, I see this as a waterproofing nightmare. P/ease provide more details about where the roof line
is hitting the sfucco and the trim pieces behind that. Unfortunately, I've seen these types of decks fail too
often because water will go somewhere.
> I very much appreciate the retention of the two love/y trees in the front.
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to place the item
on the Regular Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried
by the following vote:
City of Burlingame paye �
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 22, 2023
Aye: 7- Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse
City of Builingame Page 2
Page 1 of 1
Form + One
4843 Silver Springs Drive
Park City, UT 84098
RECE�VED
P+ 415.819.0304
E + tim@formonedesign.com
MAY 3 1 2023
TRANSMITTAL FORM CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIV.
To: City of Burlingame From: Tim Raduenz
Subject: 1235 Cabrillo Date Sent: OS/31/23
Number of Pages:l
Response from Planning Commission Comments of May 22"�:
Plan comments:
1. Please see updated sheet A5.0 for updated trim on window detail.
2. Please see updated sheet A3.0, stucco above garage door will be painted & garage door will be replaced
with a glass door to add a better aesthetic to the front of garage.
3. Please see updated note on sheet A2.1. roof deck will be properly waterproofed & drained.
4. Please see updated 3d, proper siding/ stucco is being shown.
�/�"
Best,
Tim Raduenz — CGBP
�
Build It
GREEN�r
MEMBER
FOrm + One • Design & Planning • 4843 Silver Springs Drive� Park City • UT • 84098 •(nis) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com
City of Burlingame + Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road •(650) 558-7250 •�I;:�nnir7pdeui_�Gurlin�;ame,org
�s"x�+�.
"���' Pro�ect App�ication - Ptanning Div►�sion
� : 11k?LI1�i,.,;�M4.'.
��. iS�-ir.. !iik
��
_ .. _ _. ... _.,
Type of Application: ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑ Canditianal Use/Minor Use Permit
1y t Uesign Review [� ;�iills�de A�-ea Construction Permit � MJinor �llodification
� SpQcia.l PQrmit ❑ Variance ❑ Other
_._ _.. ... _ . ...._ _ . . . _. _ __._ .. _
_ __ ... _ _
Project Address: 1235 CABRILLO AVE. Assessor's Parce! #: 026-171-350 Zoning: R3
Project Description:
ADDITION/ DORMER ADDED TO THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE RESIDENCE. NEW WINDOWS THROUGH OUT
THE SECOND FLOOR AIVD DECI'CS ADDED TO iHE REAR 2 SECOND FLOOR BEDROOMS.
Applicant
Name: TIM RADUENZ
Address: 4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE
PARK CITY, UT 84098
Phone: 415-819-0304
E-maid:
T1M@FORMONEDESlGN.COM
Architect/Designer
Name: TIM RADUEI�Z
Address: 4843 SILVER SPRfNGS DttIVE
PARK CITY, UT 84098
Phone: 415-819-0304
E-mail: nM@'FO'�'MOIVI'E'D'ESaG9a1.COM
Property Owner
Name: DAN GRIFFIN
Address: 1235 CABRILLO AVE.
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Phone:
�-,rnai!:
Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans:
I herekyy �rant the City of 8urlingame the authority to a�ost
p'rans submitted with this application on the City's website
as pai i of tlie Fl�ii.�nii�g approval proccss and waive any
claims against the City arising out of or related to such
action.
�R (Initials of Architect/Designer)
24'Sf99
Burlingame 8usiness license #: "` Architect/Desi�ner rnust have a vaaid Burlingame Business i.icense.
Applicant: l hereby certify under penaity of per�ury-tia�t tne information given �erein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. /�
Applicant's signature: !�"' ' T'� Date: 11/2/22
Property Owner: t am awase of the proposecf applica�ion and hereby autf�orize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Division.
j�..,, 11/2/22
Property owner's signature: (�L �v�,�i�NV\ Date:
11
Date Application Received (staff only):
RECEIVED
NOV 9 2022
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIVISION
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • www.burlin�ame.or�
-��r•t
� ��
EJRLINGAME
�'�
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Chapter 25.78).
Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether
the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construdion or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing
street and neighborhood.
2.
�
THE GABLES OF THE DORMER WILL HELP THE HOUSE FIT IN BETTER WITFi THE
NEIGHBORHOOD AS THE MAJOITY OF THE NEIGBORING HOUSES HAVE FRONT FACING
DORMERS. THE ROOF DECK ADDS USABLE SPACE FOR THE OWNER, WHILE RETAINING
PRIVACY FORBOTH THE NEIGHBORS AND THE OWNER DUE TO THE PRIVACY PLANTINGS. THE
NEIGHBORS HAVE AL50 SIGNED OFF ON THE CHANGES (THE DORMER & ROOF DECK) AND
ARE EXCITED TO SEE THE FINISHED HOUSE WITH THE UPDATES!
Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the
proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and
neighborhood.
A LARGE AMOUNT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE WOOD ACCENTS WHICH ARE TO BE ADDED
ON THE NEW DORMERS. THE ROOF DECK IS BUILT INTO THE EXISTING ROOF AND BLENDS IN
WITH THE HOME. THERE ARE AL50 OTHER NEIGHBORS WHO HAVE ROOF DECK IN THE FRONT OF
THEIR HOMES.
How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by
the City?
THE NEW DORMERS ARE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACKS & BUILDING ENEVELOPE & ARE ALSO
CONSISTANT WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN GUIDELINES. THE NEW ROOF DECK FOLLOWS THE
GUIDELINES & SETBACKS AS WELL.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate.
THERE ARE WILL NOT BE ANY TREES REMOVED WITH THIS PROJECT.
RECEIVED
MAY 09 2023
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIVISION
City of Burlingame
Special Permit Application (R-1 and R-2}
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale ond dominant structural choracteristics of the new construction or
addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood.
How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties?
If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale
and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views
from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the righi, left, rear and
across the street.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no
change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc.
with other structures in the neighborhood or area.
1. Explain how the variety of roof line, facode, exterior finish materiols and elevations of the proposed new
structure or oddition ore consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing
neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing
architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your
proposal fits in the neighborhood.
How will the srructure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image
or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the
character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City?
Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your
project meet these guidelines?
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE
TO AVALIBLE PARKING
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of strudure; THE NEW STYLE Wlll BETTER MATCH THE NEIGH80RHOOD
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is
necessary and is consistent with the tity's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for ihe
removal of any trees? Exploin why this mitigotion is appropriate.
Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and
if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is
being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so.
, nt� .v„
�
s r� �� !"t
��,,f� i �
�w'
RECEIVED
_ APR 20 2023
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DNISION
_ . . ,. �.,,, �.�,�*' �'r �_, _ "
� � : zY�W. �G '� V �! � 4dS�
i 7
A �� 1i 3 4
J
k�
. . . Y A t'� y `�''4�1' �
yv� . k
'�nt �+
� a��✓
, ::-
tR .
,��
� � -;tr��,
Re� Dormer windows @ 1235 Cabrillo Ave. Burlmgame .;
x �
. x �'*T,��/,
, . ..: . ^y. .,-, .:1..5
1237 Cabrillo Ave. : , ;v
Bu�lingame, CA 94410 � _ .� . r ;�w
� ,,>_
�`;{;; ;�
From Mr. & Mrs. Hans Geiger, ���
4t:
� .y,.
in regards to the dormer windows at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., I like the way it will look. There
is a house down the block like this and it looks good.
� « � ��
�
� '�
r �� Yl,
��
. . . :e�9 ._ . , . v�.,a:4 `,�'':_
'�►, _
From: Eric Zankman <ezankman@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:52 AM
Subject: Dormer Windows at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., Burlingame, CA
To: economvsf@�mail.com <economvsf@�mail.com>
Hi Dan,
Based on the photograph that you sent illustrating the dormer windows that you are
planning to add to your house at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., we have no objection.
Best of luck on your remodel!
Regards,
Eric Zankman
Pamela Kaufmann
Owners, 1229 Cabrillo Ave.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW
AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn
Review and Special Permit for second story balconv for a second story addition to an existinq sinqle-unit
dwellinq at 1235 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1. Daniel Griffin, property owner, APN: 026-171-350;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 12,
2023, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial
evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and
categorical exemption, per Section 15303 (e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures
are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more
than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved.
2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff
report, minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the
County of San Mateo.
Chairperson
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 12th dav of June, 2023 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Effective June 22, 2023
Page 1
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped May 31, 2023, sheets T1.0, GN, CG, SW, FAR, and A1.0 through A9.0;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division
or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this
permit;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required
to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by
the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of
approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of
approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the
approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the
project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional,
that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for
the property;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Effective June 22, 2023
Page 2
11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,
such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural
certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the
Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
CITY OF BURUNGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �EPAftTMEMT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMR05E ROAD
' BURLINGAME, CA 44010
PH:(650j558-7250
www.bu�lingame.org
Project Site: 1235 Cabrillo Arenue,:oned R-i
The (ity of Burlingame Planning (ommissian annountes the follawing
public hearing on Mondar, Juna 14, ZOZ3 at 7:00 P.M. You may
oftend the rneeting in person at [ity Hall {SOl Primrose Rd) or oniina at
www.zoom.us(join or hy phone ot {3�6} 248-T799:
Meeting ID: 865 61 Z6 9841 Passcode: 8I91�$
Description: Application for Design Review and Specicl Permit For
second stary 6olm�r for a second story addition to an existing single-
unit dwelling.
Members of tha public may s�eok at the meeting or pravide
camments by emait to publiccommeMCaaburlinyame.ora.
fur mo�e information, pleose visit www.burlingome.orgjpcmeetings
�lailed: June 2, 20Z3
(Pfease refer to other side j
PUBLIC HEARING
NOrTICE
Citv of Burlinaome - Public Heorina Notice
If yau have any questions about this application or would like ta schedule an
appointment to vfew a hard copy af the application and plans, please se�nd an email to
alannin�deot(c�burlir�,�ame.or� or call {650) 558-7250.
Individuals who �equire special assistance or a disability-related modification or
accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to
request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting noiite, agenda packet or other
writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at
plannin�dentCa�burlin�ame.ora or (650j 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be lirnited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the pubtic hearing, described in the notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants
about this notice.
Kevin Gardiner, AICP
Community Development Director (Please refer to othe�sidej
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
300' noticing
APN: 026-171-350
� U� �� ��v� �� �� �� - �v �� � �� a
� C� ��'' `� q� - Q '�3� � �� �� Z
, ��� E�:.w�� �� -Rj� Q Q �*u _ �v Q'V
� B r..� nc �i �'' �c� �l` r,,(�?i �b �' Q�f � � � � Q�I �
'nJ
D��,•�,�, � , = ��?�� a�v �C... � t� �y � Q`tiv ��j q�
��� �;' � Q �v �``� 4 ,�� O `a�j r�`�G� a
�1� ���`� a��� � 4� ��� �V � �v Q�
, ��� �7�Q� ��`� • q�(� a q1'` ��� � ��j �,�
. �
v�� � ���,��, � Q�`t�� r�`�`'� ��� � � ��3 �� Q� `�;
� � , �a , �a b �� � �� q3 �c,
��� -'; � q�^ r �
�at � W cti. �7
fl,.s c:.ti' :. !� l�' �`�`` ._4'� � c;�
�� ����
� �.
��� �
�
��C ��
a �
_ ���a
- �p�� � �a
_ J Q� �
- ��ii
P
C7
7 �
i+til '�+}
p
�
���.
�r,;� a
�
�� aY �. � ,
�I� �'� q� �r�
� �� `'��� � �v �� �
� p
s3�' n� ..�1`� _�J � c•,i�� �
� �Cq`t
� _
��� ��
a�
a
�� Q�� �
qa �
� a o
�� �p '
QM1 � M
'� �
�Q pa
l„�` *�
G�
Qb Q�C�
b
��� � [
�,° a,
�a ��
�
Q� �� � �����
ia� � �
�Q ��� � �
a� _ 4�� . ., t3a� �
City of Burlingame
Design Review and Special Permit
Address: 1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Item No. 10a
Design Review Study
Meeting Date: May 22, 2023
Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for second story balcony for a second story
addition to an existing single-unit dwelling.
Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form One
Property Owner: Daniel Giffin
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 026-171-350
Lot Area: 6,000 SF
Zoning: R-1
Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that contains an existing two-story single-unit
dwelling and an attached garage. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing second story at the front
of the house with a shed dormer to convert existing attic storage areas to living spaces with appropriate ceiling
heights.
The existing house is nonconforming in floor area (3,286 SF, 0.55 FAR existing where 3,020 SF, 0.50 FAR is
the maximum allowed). With this application, the project proposes a total floor area of 3,269 SF (0.54 FAR).
Because there is no increase in the existing nonconforming floor area, a Variance is not required (includes
front porch and JADU exemptions).
A Special Permit is being requested for a 69 SF second story balcony at the front of the house (Special Permit
required for any second story balcony; 75 SF inaximum allowed). The proposed balcony is designed so that
it extends over and incorporated into the roof of the existing attached garage.
There would be no increase in the number of bedrooms (four existing; expanded spaces do not qualify as
bedrooms since they are a part of existing bedrooms). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered,
are required for a four-bedroom house. The existing attached garage provides two covered parking spaces
(21'-0" x 26'-6" clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered space (9' x 18') is provided in the driveway. All
other Zoning Code requirements have been met.
Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit
This project includes a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) (418 SF) located within the main dwelling. No
on-site parking is required for the JADU. Review of the JADU application is administrative only and is not
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff has determined that the JADU complies with the ADU
regulations.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.68.020(C)(1)(b));
and
■ Special Permit for second floor balcony (69 SF proposed where up to 75 SF is allowed with a Special
Permit) (C.S. 25.10.030 and 25.78.020(A)(7)).
This space intentionally left blank.
Design Review and Special Permit 1235 Cabrillo Avenue
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: A ril 28, 2023
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
: ................................ :......... .......
Front (1St flr): 20'-0" no change 15'-0" or block average
(2"d flI'): 57'-7" 47'-0" 20'-0"
Side (left): 4'-0" no change 4'-0"
(right): 5'-0" no change 4'-0"
,..... .... � ......... ...
Rear (15t flr): 30'-0" no change 15'-0"
�2nd flr): 35'-0" no change 20'-0"
;. � ............ .
Lot Coverage: 2,289 SF 1,871 SF 2,400 SF
38.2% 31.1 % 40%
:......................................................................................................................................:............................................
.
FAR: 3,286 SF *' 3,269 SF * 3,020 SF 2
0.55 FAR 0.54 FAR 0.50 FAR
;. .......... .....
# of bedrooms: 4 no change ---
Off-Street Parking: 2 covered no change 1 covered
(21'-0" x 26'-6" clear ;(10' x 18' clear interior)
interior) 1 uncovered
1 uncovered (9' x 18')
(9' x 18')
Building Height: 24'-10'/" no change 30'-0"
, ................................. ..........'......
P/ate Height
��Sr f�r�: 8'-1" no change 9-0
�2nd f��.1; 8'-1 " No change 8'-0"
i
DH Envelope: does not comply — complies C.S. 25.10.055(A)(1)
existing nonconforming
Second Floor Balcony: n/a 69 SF 3 75 SF
(12'-0" right side �g°_0" side setbacks)
setback)
* JADU is exempt from lot coverage and floor area ratio.
' Existing nonconforming floor area.
2 (0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF = 3,020 SF (0.50 FAR)
3 Special Permit required for a second floor balcony (69 SF second floor balcony proposed where 75 SF
is the maximum allowed).
-2-
Design Review and Special Permit
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: aluminum clad wood with simulated divided lights and wood trim
• Doors: wood entry door
• Siding: combination stucco, wood and brick veneer
• Roof: composition shingle
• Other: wood roof eave brackets and wood porch posts
Staff Comments: None.
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by
the City Council on December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory structures;
5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the existing
structure as remodeled.
Required Findings for Design Review: Any decision to approve a Major Design Review application shall
be supported by written findings addressing the criteria set forth in Chapter 25.68. In making such
determination, the following findings shall be made:
The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable provisions of
Title 25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations, and most
specifically, the standards established in the Design Review Criteria above, as applicable.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and other
circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public health,
safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.
Required Findings for a Special Permit: Any decision to approve a Special Permit application in the R-1
zoning district pursuant to Chapter 25.78 shall be supported by written findings. In making such determination,
the following findings shall be made:
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition
are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the well-defined character of the street and
neighborhood;
2. The variety of roof line, fa�ade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed new structure
or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street, and neighborhood;
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City; and
4. Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the City's reforestation requirements, and that the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is consistent with established City policies and practices.
-3-
Design Review and Special Permit
Ruben Hurin
Planning Manager
c. Tim Raduenz, Form One, applicant and designer
Daniel Griffin, property owner
Attachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Application
Letter submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Hans Geiger, date stamped April 20, 2023
Email submitted by Eric Zankman and Pamela Kaufmann, dated April 26, 2023
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 12, 2023
Area Map
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
-4-
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road �(650) 558-7250 • pl���nnin�dc�,t��,urlin�ame.org
�s.�.,..�
'���' Pro�ect App�ication - Plan��ng Div��s�or�
, eiU4�L�tiGt�i�l4,'.
��: "."4'.'�" '��
' -- '-- .
�.
_._ . ...._ . ... . . . _.. _ _ ._ ..
Type of Application: ❑ Accessory Dwelling Uni# ❑ Conditional Use/Minor Use Permit
L1 �]esign fteview Q�1i11s�d�e Area Construction Permit � MinorlVlodification
� Speciaa P�rmit � Variance � Other
_ __. _ . . . . ..._ _ . _ . ___. . . _ __ _ .. _ . _ _. _. . . ..._ __
Project Address: 1235 CABRILLO AVE.
Project Description:
Ass�essor's Parce! t�: 026-171-350 Zoning: R3
ADDITION/ DORMER ADDED TO THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE RESIDENCE. NEW WINDOWS THROUGH OUT
THE SECOND FLOOR AfVD DECKS ADDED TO THE REAR 2 SECdND FLOOR BEDROOMS.
Applicant
Name: TIM RADUENZ
Address: 4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE
PARK CITY, UT 84098
Phone: 415-819-0304
E-mae9:
T1M @FORMONEDESIGN.COM
Architect/Designer
Name: TIM RADUENZ
Address: 4843 SILVER SPRFNGS DRtVE
PARK CITY, UT 84098
Phone: 415-819-0304
E-mail: TIM@FO'�'MON�ES�GTi.COflA
Property Owner
Nam�: DAN GRIFFIN
Address: 1235 CABRILLO AVE.
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Phone:
�-�aif:
Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans:
I herek7y grant the City of 8urlin�ame th� authority to �ost
pGans submitted with this application on the City's website
a� part of N �e Flanning approval process and waive any
claims against the City arising out of or related to such
action.
�R (Initials of ArchitectjDesigner)
2+3'S(�9
Burlingame Business iicense #: "` Architect/Desi�ner must have a vaaid 3urfingame Business iicense.
Applicant: I hereby certify under penalty of per9ur,y-t�ta�t tr�e intormation given herein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. ��� �' �
Applicant's signature: ��`" ' Date:
11/2/22
Property Owner: I am aware of the proposed appiica�i�n and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application co the Planning Division.
� 11/2/22
Property owner's signature: (�� �v_J��� Date:
U
Date Applicatian Received (staff only):
RECEIVED
NOV 9 2022
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIVISION
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • www.burlinsame.or�
-��••
'���i
EJRLINC.AME
�'�._
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Chapter 25.78).
Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether
the findings can be made for your request. Refer to the end of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing
street and neighborhood.
�
3.
THE GABLES OF THE DORMER WILL HELP THE HOUSE FIT IN BETTER WITFi THE
NEIGHBORHOOD AS THE MAJOITY OF THE NEIGBORING HOUSES HAVE FRONT FACING
DORMERS. THE ROOF DECK ADDS USABLE SPACE FOR THE OWNER, WHILE RETAINING
PRIVACY FORBOTH THE NEIGHBORS AND THE OWNER DUE TO THE PRIVACY PLANTINGS. THE
NEIGHBORS HAVE ALSO SIGNED OFF ON THE CHANGES (THE DORMER & ROOF DECK) AND
ARE EXCITED TO SEE THE FINISHED HOUSE WITH THE UPDATES!
Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the
proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and
neighborhood.
A LARGE AMOUNT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE WOOD ACCENTS WHICH ARE TO BE ADDED
ON THE NEW DORMERS. THE ROOF DECK IS BUILT INTO THE EXISTING ROOF AND BLENDS IN
WITH THE HOME. THERE ARE AL50 OTHER NEIGHBORS WHO NAVE ROOF DECK IN THE FRONT OF
THEIR HOMES.
How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by
the City?
THE NEW DORMERS ARE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACKS & BUILDING ENEVELOPE & ARE ALSO
CONSISTANT WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN GUIDELINES. THE NEW ROOF DECK FOLLOWS THE
GUIDELINES & SETBACKS AS WELL.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate.
THERE ARE WILL NOT BE ANY TREES REMOVED WITH THIS PROJECT.
RECEIVED
MAY 09 2023
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIVISION
City of Buriingame
Special Permit Application (R-1 and R-2y
1. Explain why the b/end of mass, sco/e ond dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or
addition ore consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street ond neighborhood.
How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties?
If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale
and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views
from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and
across the street.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no
change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc.
with other structures in the neighborhood or area.
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, focade, exterior finish moteriols and elevations of the proposed new
structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing
neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing
architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your
proposal fits in the neighborhood.
How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image
or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the
character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City?
Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Counci! for residential design review. How does your
project meet these guidelines?
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE
TO AVALIBLE PANKING
3. AfChIt2CtUC8I Style df1CI fT1a5S hclC� bUII( Of St1Y1CLUfe; THE NEW STYLE WILL BETTER MATCH THE NEIGHBORHOOD
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of ony new structure or addition is
necessary pnd is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigotion is proposed for the
removal of ony trees? Exploin why this mitigation is oppropriote.
Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and
if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is
being proposed to replace any trees being removed, If no trees are to be removed, say so.
,�, ��'� -�;,i,.� . ' r . _ c � � <`�'��, r� e �,+d3"�'"',�,x�'��r`�+Y'�.
� , � i`� , t �'u s�
�,�, �rn� � r.� ' �¢: t xer,rv�� :n °i.a�� . .. r . �•� .. �
Si . i U�W,
,�r �r "cti a;: � ' : '7i,'.���,`,ii
��,�y . . �: �. :, ' . ,r 4 <
� ,t . . _ y'.:, �'�#�`� .� `�y . ��p., y y i d�e �. �i� '�'
-:,'��j�� ..�. � f , '9kI
. . . � . ... i�c � e
RECEIVED '
k' j,1'� �� ��, � f�
. . . . fi, �m c��� G
� . ...:�` '�i�7 j .
. . . . �1'1,:y „ �
APR 20 2023 �� � � � -���� ,, ��
`�����s�� �
�� �
CITY OF BURLINGAME Re� Dormer windows @ 1235 Cabriilo Ave. Burlingame -` ,,,���"��',��,��
CDD-PLANNING DIVISION ' � � ���.,;
�.
1237 Cabrillo Ave. {
Bu�lingame, CA 94010 �"a ,;;
�$;
From Mr. & Mrs. Hans Geiger, `='�
� ��
In regards to the dormer windows at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., I like the way it will look. There
is a house down the block like this and it looks good.
� �
� f
�^' � v���
From: Eric Zankman <ezankmanC�yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:52 AM
Subject: Dormer Windows at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., Burlingame, CA
To: economvsf@�mail.com <economvsf@�mail.com>
Hi Dan,
Based on the photograph that you sent illustrating the dormer windows that you are
planning to add to your house at 1235 Cabrillo Ave., we have no objection.
Best of luck on your remodel!
Regards,
Eric Zankman
Pamela Kaufmann
Owners, 1229 Cabrillo Ave.
CITY Of BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEMT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE RUAO
BURUNGAME, CA 94D10
PH:(65U)558-7250
www.burlingame.org
Projett Site:1235 Cabrillo Avenue, =oned R-1
The City of Burlingame Planning tommission anrtounces the follow{ng
public hearing on Manday, Mar �Y, 40Y3 at 7:00 P.M. You may
attend the meeting in person ot City Nall (501 Primrose Rdj or online at
www.soom.us jjoin or by phune ot (346j Y�8-7799:
Meeting ID: 8Z1 4315 8103 Passcade: 9bS311
Description: Applicatiort far Oesign Review ond Special Permit for
second story bolcom► for a secand story addition to an existing single-
unit dwelling.
Members of ihe public moy speak ot tha meeiing ar provide
commeMs by email to Qubliccommer�Q6urlinpame.ora.
For mare iniormation, please risit www.burtingame.a�gf pcmeatings
Mailed: INay 12, 2023
(Please refer to o[her sideJ
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
. � �:... , � -
. . . . -_,.. , , _ . , :. � , _ . , , .. . _ ,. ,
City of Burlinaome - Public Hearing Notice
If you have any quesfions abaut this application or would like to schedule an
appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please send an email to
plannin�deat(a�burlinaame,org or call (650) 558-7250.
Individuals who require special assi5tance ar a disability-related modification or
accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to
request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting natice, agenda packet or other
wriiings that may be distributed, shauld cantact the Planning Division at
planninadent@burlingame.org or (650� 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or sameone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice
or in written correspondente delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants
about this notice.
Kevin Gardiner, AICP
Community Development Director (P/eose refer to othersrdeJ
1235 Cabrillo Avenue
300' noticing
APN: 026-171-350
4 �� �� ��� - - .�- � -„ �� _ �.:, ��, q - q� �ti
� q � �� �4� q� � Q Qv� G ' =-` `a� 'c�`a� �v
Q�� R� � n �D� q� ��r3 ap g��v � 4 �'c�
� � a �' Q �
������, -�' � 8 a „� a p � v �
ppp� � �,=� �t; � ca`� ��p � b^'v �u�4 o Q �yti� �Q Q
i7�,�. - bCa a �Q � g �bv ��J
�b '�'� ��3 ��J Q� v q�v Q�7
� a�� p��� Q� ��a � s�`�' aq,� � �� �
, a ca �
f��� � �!��,� q�`�i� b� ���` � ��� �d q� ��
�} q � - q`'13 t�i C�
t7OC� ��i1 _ ��C� � �r,� �g � { � . qVR �'3 q
Dn. t.�.�'� ., <..; Q h �.�17 b � a�. c�
�.
� ����
?� f�.
d�� �
��� Q�
p �
''= ���ti
= � a
, _ ���, Q�4j �
. q�t,�
P
�
� �
� a
p
i� �
��I �
��� �
�7
��p� q" �� � q,�'� �� �
�a ��� � q� G�
fl��� �� q A�b _� a1� n,�D �
; ��
�
C7� -
�� ���
[�
��� C�
� Q ��
� Q a�
�"
��, �
q� � �
q�� a
b�p �
a
4
Q Qc��'-�
q
q�� � �
�q� p�..1
Q� ��
� Q�
q� ��� ` Q���
4 �� r
�Q �Q �� �
q�
_(�� �.,.:.. c��' �`�