The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1128-1132 Douglas Avenue - Technical Study� ! _"_� � : � '�=+f:. �. �� •:�'S'R V '� r � : } � J y+Ly . . . .. r .. — '=s;-. . _' _' ' ". ' " � ,� `� �r�� 7 i� j°� � � '� � �,.. �, � „\ s +. 1� :♦ � f S� R� .� • ;' � Y�R� �', " �•ti , .T �"rl r a � � . � n : _ a . �'. . , k�f� � ,: t � � �..' �'- ., .. . � � ''� R � •�� • . _ �ti ' _ :+yf, S� �t w '4 ` �, v �� , .t a� �� . } �.��`r' . tuC . .. _, � � � , s �` � �a,� tir. , -.c� y� - � � E ✓ •, v � � yt� � � �! �'"" �. .�� , k� , � � l4�,." ^ _ r � w.�:_. _ _ _ 1 __ � ��,.�� - - Tti �, . �S�i:':�� s , � � . r a � ��.:� � . � : � ;—� . � . � a . • .- . �g;n -s �. . �; � ^ �� '• ' ��I��/Y • �-T:� Y� ..�`�� %; �; .. � ' .t i . Y L� � ' • � !I ♦ -� s +_�.� . � ? 4.�� '� . �, � w �_.. { A Y * �' � �' y � i� - . '�" .;� : �,�: : � 'A'+.. � 1 � _„� 'A 'd�t � j- '.�' '. . �' . °� •• � �-�._ t•��.'y'��': . 4� � - i��, .. F .. 1 �. ��.. �y '� iY� � •�' �� . ' ' � i -, r —,.. _ r � 'YY�� .. � . � � '�'^ i '� -�, �.r ��- � l., �.J �,i0� w+�� 'F . �� 5 { E� .� = � Y `��,�•• '. . $ � x, - �� - -- _ .� ..� .r City of Burlingame Douglas Avenue Multi- Family Residential Develapment Addendum to EI R September 2018 � City of Burlingame Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EI R September 2018 Prepared for: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Prepared by: Panorama Environmental, Inc. 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94103 650-373-1200 laurie.hietter�panoramaenv.com �Af��RAMA EI�'b'iRCf�M`N��;��: ]PvC. 717 Market Street, Suite 650 San Francisco CA 94103 650-373-1200 www.panoramaenv.com 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 History ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Revisions .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Evaluation .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Determination ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.5 References ...........................................................................................................................10 List of Tables Table 1 Comparison of Project Revisions to the Approved Project ............................:........ 2 Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS This page is intentionally left blank. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 I�L'�_\�I�7�►1�1�1.'.1 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM 1.1 HISTORY Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc., representing the property owner (collectively "the Applicant"), submitted an application to the City of Burlingame (City) Department of Community Development to demolish two single-family houses and a 4-unit apartxnent building on two adjacent lots, and construct a 27-unit, 5-story apartment building. The proposed project also includes moving a historic house from the project site and relocating it to another location in the City. The proposed project would be located on two adjacent lots at 1128 and 1132 Douglas Avenue. The historic house would be moved from 1128 Douglas Avenue to 524 Oak Grove Avenue. The existing house at the Oak Grove Avenue location would be demolished to accommodate the historic house. The two project sites are in the City of Burlingame in San Mateo County. The Applicant revised the proposed project in response to comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to reduce the number of residential units from 29 to 27, reduce the required parking, incorporate a guest and delivery parking space, and step back the front fa�ade of the fifth floor. These changes were evaluated in the Final EIlZ and determined to not constitute significant new information (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(a)) or result in new significant impacts or a significant increase in the severity of any impacts analyzed in the Draft EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162) (City of Burlingame, 2017). The Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project EIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2015062033) prepared for the proposed project was certified and the proposed project approved by the Planning Commission in Apri12017. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's action, the owner of an adjacent property filed an appeal of the Commission's action. The Project EIR was certified and the proposed project approved by the City Council in June 2017. The Notice of Determination was circulated in June 2017. On May 18, 2018 the Applicant submitted a request to revise several aspects of the proposed project. This Addendum will detail the requested project revisions and identify whether the revisions would result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162). The evaluation in Section 1.3 will identify if the scope of the certified EIR is adequate or if further CEQA documentation is needed. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 EIR ADDENDUM 1.2 PROJECT REVISIONS The Applicant requested project revisions that range from moving the surface parking spaces to a larger underground garage to reducing the size of bedroom windows. The project revisions compared to the approved project, as analyzed in the certified EIIZ, are presented in Table 1. Table 1 Comparison of Project Revisions to the Approved Project . .. -. - - •... -. .- .- Parking and Ctrculation Parking Driveway • 33 spaces • 34 total parking spaces • 12 surface spaces (1 guest/delivery space) • 22 underground spaces �[�]QiIY Rear Back-Up - Aisle Landscaping and Site layout Rear - Landscaping Community - Room Lot Coverage Impervious - Surface Front Setback Pervious Surface • Maximum of 50%/7,746 sf • Minimum 60% • Variance from the 10'-0" requirement, for the shared driveway width adjacent to the existing Redwood tree in the front yard, to be 9'-0" • 1 1 '-0" wide shared driveway width beyond the existing Redwood tree • Access from shared driveway to surface parking • Surface parking and narrow strip of vegetation and trees along northwestern boundary of project site • Enclosed community room and outdoor water feature in front of the building • 49.4% (7,654 sf/15,492 sf) • 83% (12,801 sf/ 15,492 sf) • 39.7% (774 sf/ 1,952 sf) ° • 33 total underground parking spaces • 30 of the underground spaces will be accommodated by car stackers • No need for widening driveway adjacent to existing Redwood tree due to relocation of surface parking spaces • 10'-0" wide shared driveway width beyond the existing Redwood tree to allow for more landscaping • Maintain a 24'-0" rear driveway back up clearance onto adjacent property • Communal space (described below) and wider strip of vegetation and trees along northwestern boundary of project site • Enclosed community room, outdoor communal seating space, and outdoor water feature in rear of the building • 49.7% (7,699 sf/15,492 sf) • 49.7% (7,697 sf/15,492 sf) • 40.0% (781 sf/1,952 sf) °•b Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 ? EIR ADDENDUM Flow-Through Bioretention Planters Building Design Number of - Units Average Unit Size Profile Setbacks Underground - Garage Balcony - Massing - Windows - Construcflon Trucks - Excavation - Depth Soil Export - • 4% of impervious surface, reductions per C3 checklist • Average maximum of 1,250 sf • City:35', maximum, 75' with Conditional Use Permit � • 2013 CBC: 60' d • Front setback: 15' requirement, 19.9' average setback • Side setback: 7' • Rear setback: 20' • 169 sf . 456 sf •27 •27 • 950 sf . 948 sf • Building height: 56'-10" • Building height: 56'-10" (parapet) e (parapet) • Garage floor depth: -1 1'- • Garage floor depth: 14'-0" 0" below grade below grade • Front setback: 19'-11 " f • Front setback: 20' • Side setback: 11' • Side setback: 11' • Rear setback: 20' • Rear setback: 20' • 10'-0" underground • 14'-0" underground garage garage height height to accommodate car stackers • No community balconies • Community balcony at rear of floors 2 through 5 • Window system at • Window system at corridors corridors on floors 2 on floors 2 through 5 is inset through 5 are flush with aparfments • Front wall of the Sth floor is • Front wall of the Sth floor is set set back compared with back further, 7'-6" compared the bottom floors with the bottom floors • Medium sized bedroom • Small bedroom windows windows • 874 trucks • 991 to 1,024 trucks 9 � 16' '' -- . 17' — • 6,000 cubic yards • 6,651 cubic yards Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 3 EIR ADDENDUM Waste ° A variance was granted. • 2,222 cubic yards • 2,222 cubic yards b The plans indicate that 60% impervious surfaces are allowed, but according to the zoning code, 40% are permitted within the front setback. The 60% impervious surfaces will not require another variance since there is no increase in the impervious area with the project revisions compared to the approved project. � Enclosures for stairways and elevators, and equipment are exempted from the height restriction as long as these features do not comprise more than 5% of the roof area and do not exceed more than 10 feet above top of parapet. d Stairway and elevator enclosures are exempt from the height restriction. e A CUP was granted. f The Project Data summary indicates a front setback of 19'-10", but the plan drawing indicates a front setback of 19'-11". 9 The increase in trucks is a result of additional soil export, equipment, and construction material import. h The Final EIR considered excavation to 16' for concrete supports, which is less excavation than for a slab floor at grade as now proposed. Source: (DTA, 2017; DTA, 2018� 1.3 EVALUATION 1.3.1 Aesthetics Construction techniques and equipment used would be the same as those analyzed in the EIR. The project revisions would involve,construction of a 5-story building similar to the approved project. General massing and appearance of the building would be similar to the approved project. The approved mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce impacts on scenic resources and from lighting and glare. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on aesthetics than those analyzed in the EIIZ. 1.3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources No change to conditions would occur that could result in an impact on agriculture or forestry resources. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on agriculture or forestry resources than those analyzed in the EIlZ. 1.3.3 Air Qua�ifiy The project revisions would require deeper excavation and increase the quantity of soil removed during construction. A minor increase in construction materials, particularly concrete, would be needed to construct the larger underground garage. Truck trips to and from the project site would increase by up to 17 percent. A small increase in the number of construction equipment vehicles or duration of use may be needed to complete the project in 14 months. Construction emissions analyzed in the EIR constituted less than one percent of the BAAQMD significance thresholds. The increase in truck trips and earth moving activities would result in greater criteria air pollutant emissions but would not result in a substantially greater impact. No Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 EIR ADDENDUM change to the number or type of units constructed as part of the revised project would occur. Operational criteria air pollutant emissions would not change. The approved mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce impacts on adjacent sensitive receptors and future residents. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on air quality than those analyzed in the EIR. 1,3,4 Biological Resources The number of protected trees that would be removed or trimmed would not change as a result of the project revisions. No changes to the impacts on nesting birds or bats would occur. The revised project would comply with the appropriate Downtown Specific Plan Conditions of Approval. The approved mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce impacts on special-status bats and protected trees. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on biological resources than those analyzed in the EIR. 1.3,5 Cultural Resources The excavation depth would be greater than the approved project but would not significantly increase the potential for uncovering cultural resources or human remains. The revised project would comply with the appropriate Downtown Specific Plan Conditions of Approval. The approved mitigation measure would be implemented to reduce impacts on cultural resources. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on cultural resources than those analyzed in the EIR. 1.3.6 Geology and Soils The acreage of project site disturbance would not increase, although the depth of excavation would be greater. The 5-story building would be generally equivalent to the building analyzed in the EIR, with a 1-foot deeper foundation. The revised project would be required to comply with the City's building code and associated protection measures to minimize erosion. The approved mitigation measure would be implemented to reduce the risk from unstable soil units. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on geology and soils than those analyzed in the EIR. 1 �3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions More soil would be exported from the project site and the number of truck trips would increase, due to the deeper excavation depth required to construct the larger underground garage. Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analyzed in the EIR were less than 22 percent of the BAAQMD significance threshold. The up to 17 percent increase in truck trips would not result in an exceedance of the significance threshold. No changes to the number or type of units that would be constructed are proposed as part of the revised project. Operational GHG emissions would not change. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on GHG emissions than those analyzed in the EIR. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 5 EIR ADDENDUM 1.3.8 Hazards and �iarardous Materials The project revisions would involve deeper excavation, greater soil export, and potentially more dewatering. Groundwater in the area is not contarninated (Cornerstone Earth Group, 2015). Additional dewatering would not increase any hazards impacts. Excavated soil exported from the project site would be tested and handled in accordance with regulations and the approved mitigation measure. Temporary road closures and need to implement the emergency access mitigation measures would not change. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on hazards and hazardous materials than those analyzed in the EIR. 1�3�9 �ydrology and Water Quality The depth of excavation would increase, potentially resulting in more dewatering. As analyzed in the EIR, construction dewatering would be required to comply with appropriate permits to minimize impacts on water quality from discharges. The overall area disturbed during construction of the revised project would not increase compared to the approved project. Impervious surfaces would decrease from 83 percent to 50 percent of the project site and the total size of the flow-through bioretention planters would increase by more than twice (from 169 sf to 456 sf). Stormwater runoff and the potential for siltation of waterways would be reduced. The approved mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the impacts on water quality. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on hydrology and water quality than those analyzed in the EIR. 7.3.10 Land Use and Planning Several project site layout features would change due to project revisions. The front, rear, and side setbacks, as well as lot coverage, would comply with the zoning requirements for the R-4 District. Another conditional use permit (CUP) for the building height would not be required since there is no increase in the building height with the project revisions compared to the approved project. The variance to permit widening of the shared driveway adjacent to the existing Redwood tree would no longer be needed with the project revisions. Another variance for front setback impervious surfaces would not be required since there is no increase in the impervious area with the project revisions compared to the approved project. No new environmental impacts would occur. Implementation of the approved mitigation measure to reduce the shared driveway's impact from inconsistency with the City of Burlingame's Municipal Code would no longer be needed. The revisions resolve community concerns regarding the shared driveway. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on land use and planning than those analyzed in the EIR. 1 o3a1 i Mineral Resovrces No change to conditions would occur that could result in an impact on mineral resources. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on mineral resources than those analyzed in the EIR. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 EIR ADDENDUM 1 �3.12 Noise Equipment used during construction and the types of construction activities would not be significantly different than those analyzed for the approved project. Greater excavation activities would occur, but surface paving would be reduced. Construction noise would not noticeably change compared with what was analyzed for the approved project. Replacing the surface parking lot with a larger below-ground parking garage would minimize operational noise associated with vehicles. The increased noise from car doors, alarxns, and driving into and out of the project site from the proposed northwestern shared driveway would be eliminated by the project revisions. The project revisions include a communal outdoor space in the rear of the building. Noise levels from normal speech levels can be as high as 58 dBA at 1 meter (Olsen, 1998). With the ambient noise levels of 59 dBA at the project site, noise levels would attenuate to below 60 dBA at less than 4 feet away from people conversing. The outdoor communal space would be set back fizrther (approximately 5.5 feet at the closest point) from the property line than the approved surface parking lot (approximately 2.5 feet at the closest point). Sounds from people talking are typical in a suburban environment. The inclusion of an outdoor communal space would not result in noise levels greater than 5 dBA above the existing ambient noise level of 59 dBA at the property line (City of Burlingame, 1975). Vegetation and the 6-foot-tall fence would further minimize the noise from future residents. The approved mitigation measures would reduce construction and operational noise impacts. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on noise than those analyzed in the EIR. 1.3.13 Popuiation and Housing The number of workers needed to construct the revised project would be similar to the approved project, as analyzed in the EIR. The project revisions do not change the number or type of units that would be constructed. The maximum number of future residents would remain the same. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on population and housing than those analyzed in the EIlZ. 1.3.14 Public Services The project revisions would not change the need for public services analyzed in the EIR, as there would be no increase in the maximum number of future residents. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on public services than those analyzed in the EIlZ. 1.3,15 Recreatian The project revisions include installation of communal outdoor space for residents that was not a part of the approved project. The outdoor space is within the project footprint analyzed in the EIR. The number of new units and residents would not change so there is no change to the need for recreational facilities analyzed in the EIIZ. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on recreation than those analyzed in the EIR. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 S EIR ADDENDUM 1,3�i 6 Transportation and Traffic Construction of the larger underground garage would require more soil export, construction materials, and construction debris than analyzed in the EIR. An increase of up to 17 percent more truck trips over the course of the construction period would be required to transport these materials to and from the project site. The additional truck trips would not substantially increase congestion on Douglas Avenue and nearby intersections beyond the impacts identified in the EIR. The approved mitigation measures would reduce any impacts on intersection operations. The number and type of units constructed would not change. As such, vehicle trips during operation of the project would not increase. 'The relocation of the surface parking spaces to the underground parking garage would eliminate any potential traffic hazards associated with ingress and egress through the 9-foot-wide northeastern driveway. This change is the project eliminates a community concern about the shared driveway. The approved Mitigation Measure Traffic-2, parts a. and b. would reduce any traffic hazards impacts associated with the underground garage driveway. Mitigation Measure Traffic-2, part c. would no longer be needed because the driveway would not be shared. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on transportation and traffic than those analyzed in the EIR. � .3.17 Utili#ies and Service Sys#ems The project revisions would require construction of a larger underground garage and deeper excavation. Additional soil and construction debris would be exported from the project site. Soil disposal could increase by up to 11 percent. It is assumed that ReThink Waste, which provides waste disposal services to the City of Burlingame, still transports waste to Ox Mountain Landfill (also referred to as Corinda Los Trancos Landfill). Ox Mountain Landfill has remaining capacity of nearly 40 percent (approximately 22 million cubic yards) (CalRecycle, 2018). Sufficient capacity remains to accommodate the increased waste disposal. The number and type of units that would be constructed would not change. Demand for wastewater treatment facilities, water, and disposal facilities would not increase during operation of the revised project. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on utilities and services systems than those analyzed in the EIR. � .3.18 Energy Construction of the revised project would require deeper excavation and installation of a larger underground garage. Truck trips could be expected to increase by up to 17 percent. A nominal increase in energy consumption, compared to the analysis in the EIR, could occur from additional truck trips and construction equipment needed to complete these construction activities in 14 months. As with the approved project, the minimal increase in fuel use during construction would not result in a significant energy impact. The maximum number of future residents would remain the same. Energy consumption associated with operation of the revised project would not change. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on energy than those analyzed in the EIR. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 s4 EIR ADDENDUM 1,3,19 Cu�ulative Ana�ysis The revised project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on any resource that could result in a new or greater contribution to cumulative impacts. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant cumulative impacts on any resource than those analyzed in the EIR. 1.3.20 Other CEQA Topics The project revisions would not result in a change to the zoning or land use designations of the project site. The revisions to the project would not commit future generations to significant changes in land use. Construction and operation of the revised project would involve use of small quantities of hazardous materials, similar to the approved project. The revisions to the project would not result in a new potential for irreversible change as a result of an environmental accident. The potential would remain low. As discussed above, the underground garage would be larger and a 17 percent more truck trips would occur throughout construction compared to the approved project. A small increase in fuel use and materials used during construction would occur as a result of the project revisions. The revised project would still be relatively small and would not consume significant quantities of non-renewable resources. The revisions to the project would require a similar number of construction workers and the maximum number of future residents would remain the same as the approved project. The revisions to the project would not result in growth-inducing impacts. The revisions to the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts on the environment than those analyzed in the EIR. 1.4 DETERMINATION No new or substantially more severe significant impacts would occur as a result of the project revisions. No new substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project would be undertaken. The mitigation measures and determination of significance for impacts included in the adopted EIR would continue to be valid. None of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or CEQA Guidelines Section 15163 requiring preparation of a supplemental EIlZ have occurred. This addendum to the adopted EIR is an appropriate level of environmental review for the project revisions, as identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 � EIR ADDENDUM 1.5 REFERENCES CalRecycle. (2018). Facility/Site Summary Details: Corinda Los Trancos Landfill ( Ox Mtn) (41-AA- 0002). Retrieved from Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/41-AA-0002/Detail/ City of Burlingame. (1975, September 15). Noise Element. General Plan. City of Burlingame. (2017, February). Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project . Final EIR State Clearinghouse No. 2015062033. Cornerstone Earth Group. (2015, August 31). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 1128 and 1132 Douglas Avenue Burlingame, California. DTA. (2017, Apri124). Site Plan. DTA. (2018, August 6). Site Plan. Olsen, W. O. (1998). Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett & Fidell (1977) Report. American Journal of Audiology, 1059-0889. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Addendum to EIR • September 2018 G 1133 Dou�las Avenue Homeowners Association Emphasis of Specific Items in the 1128-1132 Douglas Mitigation Monitoring Program, MMRP 9-24-2018 1. (Page 17) Development of a Plan for providin� Worker Parkin� off site and �enerally off nei�hborhood streets with shuttle or transportation as needed. 2. (Page14 &17) Designation of a"Community Liaison" person readily available who would be responsible for complaints regarding traffic, parking, construction noise and vibration. 3. (Pages 8& 9) Active monitorin� and enforcement of tree protection measures. 4. (Page 15) Acknowled�ement of workin� Hours will be from 8am to 6pm, Monday through Friday and from 9am to 6pm on Saturday. The 1133 Douglas owners and residents: A. Su��est periodic updates from the "Community Liaison" be provided to neighboring residents. B. (Pages 14 & 15) Request inclusion on the advance notice list for construction noise and vibration. DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM DOUGLAS AV�NUE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM INTRODUC�ION The California Environmental Quality Act requires the adoption of feasible mitigation measures to reduce tlie severity and magnitude of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with project development. CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a) state: "In order to assure that the mitigation measure and project revisions identified in the EIR...are implemented, the public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects." This MMRP includes the mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) required to address the significant impacts associated with the project being approved. The required mitigation measures are summarized in this program. FORMAT This MMRP is organized in a table format, keyed to each significant impact and each EIR mitigation measure. Only mitigation measures adopted to address significant impacts are included in this program. Each mitigation measure is set out in full, followed by a tabular summary of monitoring requirements. The column headings in the tables are defined as follows: • Mitigation Measure. This column presents the mitigation measure identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Implementation Procedure. This column provides additional information on how the mitigation measures will be implemented. • Monitoring and Reporting Actions. This column contains an outline of the appropriate steps to verify compliance with the mitigation measure. • Monitoring Responsibility. This column contains an assignment of responsibility for the monitoring and reporting tasks. • Monitoring Schedule. The general schedule for conducting each monitoring and reporting task, identifying where appropriate both the timing and the frequency of the action. Dougias Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-1 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT This MMRP will be incorporated as a condition of project approval. All mitigation measures must be carried out in order to fulfill the requirements of approval. A number of the mitigation measures will be implemented during the course of the development review process. These measures will be checked on plans, in reports, and in the field prior to construction. Most of the remaining mitigation measures will be implemented during the construction, or project implementation phase. Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-2 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MM AES-1: Design Review of the Proposed Project. The applicant shall submit revised plans for the proposed building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue to the City of Burlingame for design review. The Planning Commission as the responsible body for design review shall review the proposed project for compatibility with the City's guidelines for a residential apartment building in the Downtown Specific Plan R-4 Base District. MM AES-2: Exterior Lighting Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a detailed Exterior Lighting Plan shall be provided to the City of Burlingame for design review. The lighting plan shall utilize the following standards: a) Control stray light through use of low-brightness fixtures with optical controls. 3. b) Fully block all exterior light sources from off-site views. c) Do not permit any uplighting from any outdoor light fixture. d) Employ on-demand exterior lighting systems where feasible. Area lighting and security lighting shall be controlled by the use of timed switches and/or motion detectors. Use tinted windows in all buildinqs to reduce plare from 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. The City reviews the proposed project for compatibility with the City's guidelines. 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. The applicant files a detailed Exterior Lighting Plan for design review. The contractor implements the lighting specified in the Lighting Plan. � 1.City adopts City of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2.City completes review of the project design for compatibility 1. City adopts City of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2. The City reviews the lighting plan to verify it meets the measure requirements. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2.During design review 1. Prior to project approval 2. During design review 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-3 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM interior lights. MM AES-3: Use of Non-reflective Exterior Paint. Flat, non-reflective paint or integrated coloring shall be used in ail exterior 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts measure as condition of condition of approval with approval. project. City of 1. Prior to project Burlingame approval 2. During construction building materials throughout the 2. Contractor 2. The City conducts project. implements periodic measure during inspections to construction. ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. Air Quality _ MM AIR-1: Construction Equipment Emissions Reduction The construction contractor shall implement the BAAQMD Enhanced Exhaust Emissions Reduction Measures for Project Construction Equipment measure that requires project off-road equipment greater than 25 horsepower (hp) that operates for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities to meet the following requirements: • All backhoes engines shall meet CARB Tier 4 off-road emission standards. • All other equipment engines shall meet or exceed CARB Tier 3 off-road emission standards or be retrofitted with a CARB Level 2 diesel particulate filter 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Contractor implements condition during construction. 1. City adopts Ciry of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-4 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORENG AND REPORTING PROGRAM (DPF). MM AIR-2: Air Filhation 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts City of 1. Prior to A standard house heating, ventilation, measure as condition of Burlingame project and air conditioning (HVAC) system condition of approval with approval with a permanent filter of a minimum approval. project. 2. During efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 13 2. Contractor 2. The City conducts construction or greater shall be installed at the implements periodic relocated residence at 524 Oak Grove condition during inspections to Avenue. The MERV13 filter shall provide construction. ensure one air exchange per hour if the air compliance and source is outside/unfiltered air or four air adds inspection exchanges per hour if the air source is reporf to file. inside/recirculated air to provide an 80 percent or greater reduction of outdoor fine particulate matter (including DPMJ. Biological Resources MM BIO-l: Pre-conshuction Bat Surveys The applicant shall implement the following measures during demolition of structures and tree removal or tree pruning. City of 1. Prior to Burlingame project approval 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts measure as condition of condition of approval with approval. project. 2. Qualified biologist 2. City reviews conducts surveys for survey report. 2. Prior to demolition of existing Strucfures. Before demolition of existing bat roosts. 3. City conducts structures or structures, a qualified bat specialist 3. Measures to protect periodic tree removal shall conduct a day time search for bats are inspections to 3. During potential roosting habitat and evening implemented, as ensure construction emergence surveys to determine if the needed. compliance and structure is being used as a roost. adds inspection Biologists conducting surveys for roost report to file. sites shall use naked eye, binoculars, and a high-power spotlight to inspect Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-5 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Evening (i.e., dusk) emergence surveys shall consist of at least one bat specialist positioned at different vantage points from the structure, watching for emerging bats from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 nights within the season that construction will be taking place. Night vision goggles or full-spectrum acoustic detectors should be used during emergence surveys to assist in species identification. All emergence surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions (i.e., calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat activity [55° F and above] and no precipitation predicted). If roosting, special-status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed. Measures to protect the bats may include postponing demolition until after the May 1 st through October 1 st roosting period. Measures may include monitoring roosting to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost by either a visual inspection of the roost bat pups, or monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night and Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-6 buildings features that could house bats. The surfaces of the structure and the ground around the structure shall be surveyed for bat signs, such as guano, staining, and prey remains. DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM listening for bat pups. Eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur because bat pups are not mature enough to leave the roost. If a roost is determined not to be a maternal roost, eviction of bats shall be conducted using bat exclusion techniques developed by Bat Conservation International and in consultation with CDFW that allow the bats to exit the roosting site, but prevent re-entry to the site. This work shall be completed by a BCI- recommended exclusion professional. The exclusion of bats shall be timed and carried out concurrently with any scheduled bird exclusion activities. Each roost lost (if any) shall be replaced in consultation with the CDFW and may include construction and installation of BCI-approved bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement shall be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the structures may be removed or sealed. Tree Removal. A qualified bat specialist shall examine trees to be removed or trimmed for suitable bat roosting habitat. High quality habitat features (large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP . February 2017 MMRP-7 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The qualified bat specialist shall conduct evening visual emergence surveys of the source habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of two nights within the season that construction will be taking place. If it is found that roosting, special-status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed (see above for types of ineasures). MM BIO-2: Tree Protection Measures Tree protection specifications were developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. for the protected trees surveyed at the Douglas Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue project sites. The applicant shall implement the following tree protection measures developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. and approved by the Arborist for protected trees. The Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. reports shall be included on the demolition and construction plans of the project. Mulching. A b-inch layer of coarse mulch woodchips shall be placed beneath the dripline of protected 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approvql. 2. Contractor implements conditions during construction. 1. City adopts condition of approval with project. 2. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection reporf to file. City of Burlingame 1. Prior to project approval 2. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-8 or peeling bark, larger snags, etc.) shall be identified and the area around these features searched for bats and bat sign (guano, culled insect parts, staining, etc.). DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM trees. Mulch is to be kept 12 inches from the trunk. Profective Banier. A protective barrier or 6-foot chain link fence shall be installed around the dripline of protected trees. The fencing can be moved within the dripline if authorized by the Project Arborist or the City Arborist, but no closer than 2 feet from the trunk of any tree. Fence posts shall be 1.5 inches in diameter and are to be driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10 feet. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Cultural Resources MM CUL-1: Compatible Cladding for Historic House New construction on the relocated historic house shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the historic materials, features, size scale, and proportion, to protect the integrity of the property and its environment consistent with the Secretary of Interior's standards for rehabilitation. The choice of materials shall be submitted to the City for approval as parf of the design review process. 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approvai. 2. Applicant submits materials to the City during design review. 3. Contractor implements during construction. 1. City adopts City of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2. City reviews the choice of materials. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection reporf to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2. During design review 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-9 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MM GEO-1: Implementation of 1. City incorporates 1. Ciry adopts City of 1. Prior to Geotechnical Recommendations measure as condition of Burlingame project The Applicant and their contractors condition of approval with approval shall implement the measures outlined approval. project. 2. During and recommended in the 2. Contractor 2. The City conducts construction Geotechnical Investigation Report implements periodic Chapters 5 through 10 for the proposed condition during inspections to construction at 1128-1132 Douglas construction. ensure Avenue. compliance and adds inspection report to file. Hazards and Hazardous Materials MM HAZ-1: Preparation of a Site- specific Spill Prevention, Conhol, and Countermeasure Plan The applicant shall prepare a site- specific Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan that will identify spill prevention and response measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs). The plan will emphasize site-specific physical conditions to improve hazard prevention (e.g., identification of flow paths to nearest drains) and reduce effects of accidental spilis if they occur. The Applicant shall designate a representative to ensure that all hazardous materials and safety plans are followed throughout the construction period. BMPs identified in 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Applicant prepares and submits SPCC Plan to City. 3. Contractor implements conditions during construction. 1. City adopts City of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2. City reviews SPCC Plan to verify compliance with the measure. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection reporf to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2. At least 30 days prior to construction 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-10 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SPCC Plan shall be implemented during project construction to minimize the risk of an accidental release and to provide the necessary information for emergency response. A copy of the project SPCC shall be submitted to the City for approval at least 30 days prior to construction. All construction personnel shall be required to attend SPCC training prior to conducting any work on the project site. MM HAZ-2: Soils Test Prior to construction, the applicant shall evaluate shallow soils at all structure locations for the possible presence of lead and pesticides. If lead or pesticides are found within the tested 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Applicant conducts soils evqluation. City of 1. Prior to Burlingame project approval 2. Prior to construction 3. During 1. City adopts condition of approval with project. 2. City reviews soils evaluation. soils, the applicant shall dispose of the 3. Contractor properly 3. The City conducts construction soils, consistent with federal, state and disposes of soils in periodic local laws regarding disposal of accordance with inspections to hazardous materials. the measure. ensure compliance and adds inspection reporf to file. Hydrology and Water Quality MM HYDRO-1: Stormwater Pollution 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts Prevention Best Management Practices measure as condition of The applicant will implement the condition of approval with following best management practices apProval. project. City of 1. Prior to Burlingame project approval 2. During during construction of the proposed 2. Contractor 2. The Clty conducts construction project: implements periodic • Preserve existing vegetation where conditions during inspections to Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP . February 2017 MMRP-11 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MM NOISE-1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation Outside of Permitted Conshuction Hours The Applicant shall prepare a Relocation Plan and obtain approval from the City under Municipal Code Section 18.07.110 for historic house relocation. The Relocation Plan shall include: 1. Exact procedure for cutting and dismantling the historic house, and loading on trucks 2. Specific routes for movement of the historic house from its existing location to 524 Oak Grove Avenue 3. Exact procedure for setting the house in its new location 4. Estimated duration for the various activities involved in the cutting, dismantling, loading, and setting of the house 5. Coordination procedures with utilities, Caltrain, and appropriate City Deparfments 6. Advance Notice to residents at each 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Applicant prepares and submits Relocation Plan. 3. Contractor implements conditions during construction. 1. City adopts condition of approval with project. 2. City reviews Relocation to ensure compliance with the measure. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. City of Burlingame 1. Prior to project approval 2. Prior to construction 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-12 feasible construction ensure . Limit disturbance to the work site compliance and • Install silt fences around the adds inspection perimeter of the project site report to file. Noise DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM project site and along the route regarding the start and duration of power interruption 7. Measures to reduce impacts of power outage on residents such as: a. Power interruption phasing to reduce amount of time houses are affected b. Offering affected parties dry ice for freezers and refrigerators c. Offering generators for life support equipment d. Security lighting Approval from the City for relocating the historic house outside of permitted construction hours would be contingent on abiding by all the best management practices required under Condition of Approval 19, and the measures included in the Noise Management Plan for the project. MM NOISE-2: Compliance with Tifle 24 Prior to issuance of a building permit, a qualified acoustical consultant shall review the final building plans to calculate expected interior noise levels. The building permit shall not be issued until the qualified acoustical consultant has reviewed the acoustical test reporf of all sound rated windows and doors and confirmed that the proposed building treatments will 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Acoustical consultant reviews final building plans 3. Contractor implements noise treatments during construction. 1. City adopts condition of approval with project. 2. The City does not issue building permit until acoustical consultant confirms the treatments City of 1. Prior to Burlingame project approval 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-13 DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MM NOISE-3: Noise Management Plan The applicant shall prepare a noise management plan that includes: a. Identified routes for movement of construction-related vehicles and equipment developed in conjunction with the Burlingame Community Development Deparfment so that noise-sensitive areas, including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible. b. A designated "Community Liaison" for construction activities. The Community Liaison would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration. The Community Liaison would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. c. Sending advance notice to neighborhood residents within 50 feet of the project site regarding the 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. 1. City adopts City of condition of Buriingame approval with project. 2. Applicant prepares 2. City reviews noise and submits noise management management plan. plan. 3. Applicant designates a community liaison and submits notifications to residents. 4. Contractor implements conditions during construction. 3. City verifies that notifications have been mailed to residents. 4. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2. Prior to construction 3. Prior to construction 4. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP . February 2017 MMRP-14 adequately reduce interior noise levels comply with the to 45 dBA or below. measure. DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITiGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM In the event that construction noise complaints are not resolved by scheduling, the applicant shall install temporary sound absorption barriers, such as noise control blankets, in addition to the standard noise barriers around the construction site required under Condition of Approval 19, best management practices. These additional barriers would be specifically designed for exterior use and would reduce the noise level beyond the fence line by at least 3 dBA. If noise complaints continue, the applicant shall install a temporary sound absorption barrier that wo�ld reduce the noise level beyond the fence line an additional 2 dBA, for a total noise reduction of 5 dBA beyond the fence line. MM NOISE-4: Restricted Construction 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts City of 1. Prior to Hours measure as condition of Burlingame project Construction hours for exterior condition of approval with approval construction activities shall be limited to approval. project. 2. During the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 2. Contractor 2. The City conducts construction Monday through Friday, and the hours implements periodic of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on conditions during inspections to Saturdays, unless a special permit is ensure C�� a�I��OW S UGir �'D �Qn^ pn Wu�c1Ar� � Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-15 construction schedule and including the phone number for the disturbance coordinator. A notice with the name and phone number of the Community Liaison shall be posted at the project site. DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Transportotion antl Traffic ; MM TRAFFIC-1: Construction Management Plon The project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must include at least the following items and requirements to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and parking congestion during construction: a. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; b. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation, and safety, and 1. City incorporates measure as condition of approval. 2. Applicant and contractor develop a construction management plan. 3. Contractor implements conditions during construction. 1. City adopts City of condition of Burlingame approval with project. 2. City reviews Construction Management Plan. 3. The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. 1. Prior to project approval 2. Prior to construction 3. During construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP • February 2017 MMRP-16 obtained in advance from the City for construction. compliance and specified activities. No construction adds inspection shall occur on Sundays or holidays. report to file. This construction noise restriction shall not apply to work done within the building after it is fully enclosed. DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM c. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; d. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and corrected by the project applicant.; e. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transporfation as needed to transport workers to the site; and f. Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. MM Traffic-2: Driveway Safety 1. City incorporates 1. City adopts Enhancements measure as condition of The project applicant and its condition of approval with constr�ction contractor(s) shall approval. project. City of Burlingame 1. Prior to project approval 2. D�rinq Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP . February 2017 MMRP-17 specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; DOUGLAS AVENUE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM implement the following safery enhancements: a. Flashing light sensors shall be placed within the project parking garage and rear surface parking areas to alert motorists outbound from the project parking areas that vehicles are inbound from Douglas Avenue (these sensors could be video or loop detected); b. Signs shail be placed at the proposed project's Douglas Avenue entrances that indicate: "Caution— Watch for Outbound Vehicles"; and c. The project design shall be modified to allow for 12-foot access on the eastern-most driveway; except as necessary to avoid impact to the two significant trees. Toward the rear of the lot, that would require either loss of landscaping, further setback for the building (at least on the first floor), and/or loss of a parking space. Contractor implements conditions during construction. � The City conducts periodic inspections to ensure compliance and adds inspection report to file. construction Douglas Avenue Multi-Family Residential Development Project MMRP . February 2017 MMRP-1$