The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1928 Devereux Drive - Staff ReportItem No. 8a Regular Action item City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1928 Devereux Drive Meeting Date: May 23, 2022 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Qing Gan Property Owner: Michael Liu General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 025-122-270 Lot Area: 5,500 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Note: This application was submitted prior to January 5, 2022, the effective date of the new Zoning Ordinance, and therefore was reviewed under the previous Zoning Code. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot. The existing one-story house with an attached garage contains 1,763 SF (0.32 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The proposed project includes a major remodel with new habitable space on the first floor that would be created by enclosing the existing covered porch; a new entry porch would be constructed at the front of the house. The second floor addition (936 SF) would add three bedrooms, two bathrooms and a laundry room. With the proposed project, the floor area would increase to 2,852 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes covered porch exemption). The existing front and left side garage walls are nonconforming with respect to front and left side setbacks (15'-3" existing front setback where 15'-4" is the block average and 3'-0" existing left side setback where 5'-0" is the minimum required). The nonconforming areas would not be modified as part of this project. The new construction proposed along the right side and front of the house (towards right side) would comply with the required setbacks. With this application, the number of potential bedrooms would increase from two to four. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage (17'-6" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) provides one covered parking space; one uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). Left blank intentionally. Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive 1928 Devereux Drive Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: Ma 12, 2022 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (1Si flr): 21'-6" 16'-5" (to new porch) 15'-4" (block average) �2nd flr): N/A ; 26'-7" 20'-0" (attached garage): 15'-3"' � No change 35'-0" Side (left): 3'-3"' No change 5'-0" (right): 5'-2" No change 5'-0" . ....... .............................................. .......................................... .... .................................................... ...... ............................................................................................. Rear (15t flr): 31'-3" No change (deck <30") ; 15'-0" �2nd flr): N/A 29'-3" 20'-0" , . ............................................................................................................................. ....... . . Lot Coverage: 1,907 SF 1,977 SF 2,200 SF 34.6% 35.9% 40% _ ............... . a............................................. ..... . . FAR: 1,763 SF 2,852 SF 2,860 SF z 0.32 FAR 0.51 FAR 0.52 FAR _ ................................ ; , .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. # of bedrooms: 2 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (17'-6" x 20'-0") No change (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ; ......................................_..................................................................................._.........._._?... ................................................__......................................................._.............. � Building Height: 17'-7" 26'-8" 30'-0" DH Envelope: Not applicable complies C.S. 25.26.075(b)(2) ' Existing nonconforming front and left side setbacks to be retained; if removed durinq construction will need to complv with current setback requirements or aqplv for Variances. 2 (0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) The revised plans, date stamped May 12, 2022, have no changes that affect the development standards listed in the table above. Staff Comments: None. Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: aluminum clad wood with simulate true divided lites • Doors: wood garage door • Siding: stucco with 1x6 horizontal fiber cement ship lap siding at gables • Roof: composition shingles • Other: wood knee braces; 1 x4 wood trim around windows; 2x6 fiber cement fascia board; 2x12 wood belly band 2 Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Planning Commission Action Meeting: On March 14, 2022 the Planning Commission reviewed the revised project and continued to have concerns with the project, noting that the previous comments were not thoroughly addressed. The project was referred to a design review consultant for additional assistance with their concerns. The following is a summary of the Commission's main concerns: • Drafting errors — plans need clean up; • Changes to the rear and south elevations aren't finished; • Revised trellis on south elevation needs work; • Concerned with window trims; • Front door seems odd/off; • Rear deck needs to be revisited - could been an opportunity to make it nicer; and • Needs more of a cohesive overall design approach that ties everything together better. Analysis and Recommendation by Design Reviewer: The design review consultant met with the architect and the property owner to review the proposal and go over the Planning Commission's comments from the March 14, 2022 Planning Commission action meeting. After working with the design review consultant, the applicant submitted a response letter, dated May 17, 2022 and revised plans, date stamped May 12, 2022, to address the Planning Commission's concerns at the direction of the design review consultant. In summary, there were no changes to the building envelope or footprint. The following changes were made; please refer to the applicant's attached response letter for a detailed description of all changes: Front (East) Elevation: - board and batten gable replaced with painted horizontal siding; - window trim has been simplified; - front door has been revised with a different taller door and no transom; - stone veneer has been removed; - front porch columns have been simplified. • Right (North) Elevation: - board and batten gable treatment replaced with painted horizontal siding; - window trim has been simplified; - stone veneer has been removed; - windows in the upper gable have been modified. • Rear (West) Elevation: - board and batten gable treatment replaced with painted horizontal siding; - window trim has been simplified. Left (South) Elevation: - side deck and ramp have been removed; - window trim has been simplified; -"belly band" added at second floor line; - trellis has been replaced with small side porch; and - windows have been modified for more consistency. Per the design reviewer's recommendation, he states that the project has been improved since the first Commission review. He initially felt that the design proposed had too much going on for a relatively small structure. Simplification would be the key to creating a subtle change to the neighborhood. Using the Planning Commission's comments as a starting point, he thinks the design has achieved that. 3 Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive The design reviewer's direction to the applicant was to simplify the design, which he felt was too busy. The revisions to the South (left) Elevation have been greatly improved with the addition of the belly band, replacement of the trellis with a roof, and especially the window revisions. The design review consultant feels that now using the horizontal siding in the gables, instead of the board and batten, softens the design nicely, grounding the house rather than adding a verticality to it that doesn't seem to fit as well. He feels that the newly proposed window trim isn't actually simpler, just quieter and more sophisticated. While this was not mentioned by the Planning Commission, the design reviewer felt that the stone wainscot at the front was unnecessary and that it further complicates what the house is trying to be. He recommended that the applicant consider removing the stone veneer, and without it, feels the house is even calmer, which is better in a tight knit neighborhood. Furthermore, he notes that stone wainscots tend to be a manufactured stone such as Eldorado, and end up cheapening the house rather than improving it. Overall, with the changes made in response to the Planning Commission's comments and the additional changes recommended by the design reviewer for cohesiveness, he can support the project as now proposed. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting on February 28, 2022, the Commission had several concerns/suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached February 28, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes). The following is a summary of the Commission's main concerns: • Front Elevation shows pre-fabricated columns, appear to be vinyl - either change to wood or fiberglass; • Windows on second floor, north elevation are not shown on the floor plan (bathroom number two) and they appear to be too small with not much glazing - revisit size of windows; • South Elevation needs work - issue with scale and blank wall on South side; south patio door at landing has a blank wall - consider adding a roof eave over the door to break up that elevation; • Consider extending the roof over bathroom number one at the back of the patio door to help with the scale; • Window sizes seem too big — please revisit window and door sizes and proportions; • Window pattern seems different in the renderings please be consistent; and • Verify window trim sizes (new or existing) - window trim looks out of place - existing trim may be very small, please look at refining this trim detail. The applicant submitted a response letter (see attachments) and revised plans, date stamped March 4, 2022 to address the Planning Commission's concerns. In summary the following changes were made, but please refer to the applicant's attached response letter for a full detail of all changes: • Front columns changed to fiberglass; • North Elevation — bathroom #2 windows increased in size (glazing); • Window proportions revised; • South Elevation — window added to the guest bedroom (1 St floor) and wood trellis added above window and patio door; and • Window trim sizes revised (increased). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4 Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the proposed addition has been designed to be integrated into the existing structure and to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood; that the architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed materials include upgrades to the existing materials with stucco, fiberglass columns, wood garage door, fiber cement ship lap siding at the gables, wood trim around the aluminum clad wood windows, wood guardrails, wood decorative knee braces, and composition shingles. For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 12, 2022, sheets GO, A1.0 through A4.0, and site survey sheet; 2. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the left side setback at 3'-3" where 5'-0" is required per code and measuring 21'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Side Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 3. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the front setback (garage wall) at 15'-3" where 35'-0" is required per code for a two-car attached garage and measuring 18'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Front Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans � Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Qing Gan, applicant and architect Michael Liu, property owner Attachments: March 14, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated May 17, 2022 Design Reviewer's Recommendation (Design Review Memo), dated May 16, 2022 February 28, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated March 4, 2022 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 13, 2022 Area Map C� CITY �� ''�1� - - � �- i � ��'�� i�.aJ , a .tico — 90 Rnown� City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, March 14, 2022 7:00 PM Online e. 1928 Devereux Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Michael Liu, applicant and property owner; Qing Gan, architect) (106 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon All Commissioners have visited the project site. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Schmid opened the public hearing. Oliver Qing Gan, designer, represenfed the applicant and answered questions about the application. Public Comments: > There were no public comments. Chair Schmid closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > Correct drafting errors. Drawings should indicate thaf the French doors are sliding doors and the deck is existing to remain. > The front door is very odd given the rest of the house. The house is leaning towards a modernist direction, but the front door is a Dutch door design with a solid panel and glazing. That design element needs rethinking. It seems very out of place on the facade. The general theme is similar to the last project where we need to see some sense of credibility with whaf is being proposed. > The wood handrail doesn't work and it would look like it was a temporary retrofit if iYs built the way iYs proposed. It certainly wouldn't sustain a 200 pound lateral force which is required by code. > The addition of the window is fine, but there's no reason it shouldn't be the same as the two windows adjacent to it. The answers were rationalizations and there's no real reason for changing it. > The trellis is an interesting idea but that entire area just doesn't hang together. It feels it was just crammed in there as a response to the plan check comments and I don't think it works. > The 2" x 4" window trim may work, but it doesn't fee/ like it's fhere yef. > I appreciate the changes that were made in response to the comments, the windows upstairs and bathroom windows for example, but 1 don't have a whole lot of con�dence in what I'm seeing right now largely because it just doesn't hang together. It fee/s like a patch work. Had I known we were going to end up here tonight, I would have suggested that this be referred to a design review consultant then. 1'm hesitant to do it now, but it needs more work. > 1 agree with my fellow commissioner on this. In a lot of ways when 1 look at the elevations and squint, 1 like a lot of the window pattern. They're not oversized and fhey're nof wrong; there are a lot of nice things going on in terms of scale. But I'm a little concerned with the trims because if you held some of those trims up against the existing house and tried to put together a vocaBu/ary thaf works, what I'm seeing mighf be chal/enging for somebody. I wish 1 was feeling more confident that what we're looking at to Ciry of Burl/ngame Page 1 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 14, 2022 approve could be built that way and we would all be happy at the end. So, I'd like to feel more confident as well. A frellis is a starf in fhat area, but it doesn't quite go far enough. IYs just an eyebrow when there needs to be something a litt/e bit more substantial in that corner. In a way it looks good in elevation, but 1 don't think it's going to reflect that way when I look af if three-dimensionally and what it does to make that corner any better. There's an opportunity to make the deck a little nicer, if needs a little bit more to it. Overall, iYs going in the right direction, but there is some room for it to get better and it would be time well spent so fhaf what we approve can be executed and everybody knows what fheyre going to get. > 1 agree with my fellow commissioners. I do think this would be a great candidate for a design review consultant. 1 know that they've done a really nice job in trying to tie it all together, but 1 feel that having somebody to help them out to finish the project would be beneficial and might get them just over fhat hurdle instead of having them come back. > I feel compelled to give an example of the challenge that we face above and beyond the wood handrail. If you look at the trellis end shape at the south elevation, you can see the same trellis end shape when you're looking at the west elevation. IYs unclear if one is stacked on top of another, that's what lm seeing, maybe it makes more sense than f think it does. I now see how it's proposed to work. I was /ost to how it could be built, but it looks like if can be built. One of fhe reasons I said it is a mess is if you look at the west elevation, I would expect that frellis to pickup on some line of the building but nothing is lining up there, nothing seems to be associated with anything else. That's the problem, fhe proposed project doesn't seem to be reflecting the other things going on in the house. One place doesn't reflect what's going on in anofher place in an incredible way. lYs very strange. > In response to what my fellow commissioner was saying, we've spent a considerable amount of time on this projecf now in two meetings. I'm not clear if the applicant is understanding all of the changes cohesively to pull everything together. Enough commentary has been provided to assist them, but since the design review consultant fee is a part of the fees paid for the design review, for expediency and consistency of design, it would be a good idea to run it through a design review consultant to work with this applicant to c/ean up the design, make it cohesive and make it make sense so we will be ready fo approve and move it forward the next time we review this project. > It seems that might be a good motion we can get behind. 1 don't look at it as a punishment, but us trying to find the best way forward to help the applicant get to the endgame and for all of us to be satisfied fhat our direction is understood. > IYs just to expedite the process for the applicant. It doesn't need a lot of time from the design review consultant and it would tie the whole project together quickly for fhem to get them through the system a little bit quicker. Commissioner Comaroto made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to refer the application to a design review consultant. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Comaroto, Tse, Gaul, Loftis, Schmid, and Pfaff Absent: 1 - Terrones City of Burlingame Page 2 1928 DEVEREUX DRIVE-SINGLY FAMILY HOUSE MAJOR REMODEL 2nd DESIGN REVIEW STUDY MEETING (March 14, 2022) PLAN REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE: May 17, 2022 This round of revision is under the instruction of the Design Review Consultant. GENERAL: • Per comment, all window and door trims have been simplified. All trims shall be 1x4 wood trim boards. • All gable wall siding has been changed from panel and batten siding to ship lap siding to increase horizontal lines. EAST ELEVATION (FRONT): • Per comment, the entry door has been revised to be a simple panel door with a side light. • To simplify this elevation, the stone veneer base has been removed. The entry porch columns have been revised by removing the pedestals and the moldings. NORTH ELEVATION (RIGHT): • Per comment, the layout of the 2"d story shared bathroom is revised so to have a regular window (instead of high window) centered with the gable. WEST ELEVATION (REAR): • See the revisions on South Elevation. SOUTH ELEVATION (LEFT): • Per comment, the entry door on the floor plan has been change to French doors to match south elevation. • The layout of the master bathroom on the 2"d floor has been changed so to have a big regular window on the south wall. • Per comment, the window on the ground floor next to the entry door has been change to have the same size as the two windows on the left. • Per comment, the existing wood deck, ramp, and wood handrails shall be removed and replaced with a new concrete steps and concrete patio. • Per comment, to separate the ground floor and 2"d floor to break down the scale, the previously proposed trellis is replaced with a covered porch. The new porch has 9' plate height to align with the ground floor roof on the west elevation. The porch column is the same as the columns of the main entry porch. A new belly band has been added right at the floor line to furth separate the two stories. Please notice that there is no building footprint change at this round of revision. REALLY APPRCIATE THE HELP FROM THE DESIGN REVIEW CONSULTANT, RANDY GRANGE. Sincerely Yours, C� �� Qing Gan (architect of this project) Design Review Memo City of Burlingame Date: May 16, 2022 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 1928 Devereux Architect: Qing Gan Planner: Catherine Keylon I have received and reviewed the latest plans (3-1-2022) submitted to the Planning Commission for 1928 Devereux. I listened to the Planning Commission's comments in the meeting video. I met with the owner, Architect, and Planner at City Hall to discuss the Planning Commission's comments. Per our suggestions, the designer made revisions and we reviewed one interim design in between our first meeting and the current plans (5-12-2022). Following is a comparison between the original design, and the current design. Revisions to original design: Floor Plans: Side deck and ramp have been removed. Front (East) elevation: • The board and batten gable treatment has been replaced with painted horizontal siding. • The window trim has been simplified. • The front door has been revised with a different taller door and no transom. • The stone veneer has been removed. • The front porch columns have been simplified. Right (North) elevation: • The board and batten gable treatment has been replaced with painted horizontal siding. • The window trim has been simplified. • The stone veneer has been removed. • The windows in the upper gable have been modified. Rear (West) elevation: • The board and batten gable treatment has been replaced with painted horizontal siding. • The window trim has been simplified. Left (South) elevation: • The window trim has been simplified. • The existing deck and ramp have been removed. • A"belly band" has been added at the second floor line. � The trellis has been replaced with a small side porch. • The windows have been modified for more consistency. DESIGN GUIDELINES: 1. Compatibility of the Architectural Style with that of the Existing Neighborhood. There are a variety of houses on this block. The style of this house is generally traditional, and the proposed design should be compatible. The massing is respectful of the neighboring properties. 2. Respect for Parking and Garage Patterns in the Neighborhood The proposed attached garage is "existing to remain" and consistent with the neighborhood. 3. Architectural Style, Mass 8� Bulk of the Structure: The revisions made to the initial proposal have improved the architectural style of the project. The architectural style is more consistent. Proposed changes, such as the new simplified material pallet, softens the mass. 4. Interface of the Proposed Structure with the Adjacent Structures to Each Side: The proposed house will interface reasonably well with its neighbors; similar to others in the area. The new second floor is set well back from the sides of the house and well past the daylight envelope. 5. Landscaping and its proportion to the Mass and Bulk of Structural Components: The proposed landscaping is essentially the same as the existing landscaping. SUMMARY The project has been improved since we first saw it. My first impression of the design proposal was that there was perhaps, too much going on for a relatively small structure. Simplification would be the key to creating a subtle change to the neighborhood. Using the Planning Commission's comments as a jumping off point, I think the design has achieved that. The left (South) elevation really benefits from the addition of the belly band, replacement of the trellis with a roof, and especially the window revisions. In my opinion, using horizontal siding in the gables instead of the board and batten softens the design nicely, grounding the house rather than adding a verticality to it that doesn't seem to fit as well. The newly proposed window trim isn't actually simpler, just quieter and more sophisticated. Although not mentioned by the Planning Commission, I feel that the stone wainscot is unnecessary; It further complicates what the house is trying to be. Without it, the house is even calmer, which is better in a tight knit neighborhood. Furthermore, these stone wainscots tend to wind up being a manufactured stone such as Eldorado, and end up cheapening the house rather than improving it. With all that said, I can support the project as now proposed. Sincerely Randy Grange, AIA LEED AP F, c�ry a ��,�� ,, � ;.� a '�o� .-90 Rvoww City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, February 28, 2022 7:00 PM Online d. 1928 Devereux Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. (Michael Liu, applicant and property owner; Qing Gan, architect) (106 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon Aetachmenrs: 1928 Devereux Dr - Staff Report 1928 Devereux Dr - Attachments 1928 Devereux Dr - Plans All Commissioners have visited fhe project site. Community Development Director Gardiner provided an overview of fhe staff report. Chair Schmid opened the public hearing. Oliver Gan, designer and Michael Liu, property owner, represented the applicant and answered questions about the application. Public Comments: > There were no public comments. Chair Schmid closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > Provide spec sheet of the pre-fabricated vinyl column proposed at the front e/evation. > Concerned about the north elevation bathroom window size because it does not provide enough g/azing and may not be commercially availab/e. Encourage to revisiting with the owner. > South elevation is a tall blank wall without a lot of sca/e. Consider adding anofher window or extend a portion of the roof of the garage to create a covered porch over the patio door. > Struggling with the window sizes, they seem big. The vinyl column wraps are not going to be a good solution, consider using fiberglass or wood column. > Rea/ly appreciate the montage of photographs that were provided, it is remarkab/y helpful to see the buildings next fo each other and give an overview of what we are looking at. > The window trims are quite bizarre, not sure if these are existing or proposed solution for the projecf. > The west and front elevation seemed very well composed, everything is in proportion with each other, although some of the windows are quite large. The north elevafion is also ok. The south elevation seems lost like it isn't part of the same building. This fa�ade needs to be revisited. The solution my fellow commissioner pointed out is a good one but it seems to me that it has to be more than that. There are a lot of good fhings in this p�oject, it is c/ose. > 1 agree with my fellow commissioners, the south e/evafion needs some work and the small window needs to be addressed. > The windows are fhe big issue. Structurally, they will not work. They all seem squished underneath the double top plate of the top floor and you need some room for a header. Suggest speaking with an engineer or a contractor abouf how those could be built. The windows on the top floor seem out of scale. The patio City of Burlingame Page 1 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes February 28, 2022 door on the south elevation can be lowered. The sizes of the windows and the doors need to be looked at. The project can be moved forward because it is proportioned well and it fits the neighborhood but there are some scale issues with some of the elements mentioned. > Looking at the existing trim on the photos, it actually is quite a bit smaller which is more typical of a Ray Park home in that area. It probably is a 2" trim whereas the drawing is showing a 4" trim. It is definitely going up in scale and everything is a little bulked up. There are some opportunities for refinement. Commissioner Loftis made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Terrones, Tse, Gaul, Loftis, Schmid, and Pfaff Absent: 1 - Comaroto City of Burlingame Page 2 1928 DEVEREUX DRIVE-SINGLY FAMILY HOUSE MAJOR REMODEL March 02, 2022 DESIGN REVIEW STUDY MEETING PLAN REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE: • Front elevation shows pre-fabricated columns, appear to be vinyl, either change to word or fiberglass; � � �� , � , � . , �� -_ �� • Window on north elevation is not shown on the floor plan and bathroom number two, it appears to be too small with not much glazing revisit size of window; R: The two higf� windows �r2 ��.:�w shown on tV��e 7_"`' � �r i;i��. l�f�ie wir�Uowsills 'i�ave I��e�� lowered to niake the t�n�r� ��indows hi�her, ha��e i�nort, �,i��nz, a� e��, and have better proportion. Please see north elevation on `�: _ ,-, • South elevation patio door at landing has a blank wall - consider adding a roof eave over the door to break up that elevation; �� -��, :�� ; �:re� ext�� ior wall o�f the hallway to tl�ie Gues't Bedroom. Also add a wood irellis above this winciov✓ and tiie patio door to partially separate the two stories and also provide shading. The length of the trellis matches the length of the existing deck. The fenestration of the guest room has been changed. There are two windows on the south exterior wall of the guest room. This way can fill the blanl< wall and break down the scalc of i�fie sout!� ��. ��io��. Please e� �! i�r �o�,t��. F�Jevation on shr�el ��4 �ind :�: .�, � �; �� :'. �,_ fl�;o�� r�� <<. r��F�rr�n< <.'. • Consider extending the roof over bathroom number one at the back of the patio door it will help with the scale and can reduce the master bedroom; 'tZ �� ; _. .�i�,�,�,�,, ;�;,. • Issue with the scale on the south elevation and blank wall on south; � ir �_ _. ;��,,:� L„' • Window sizes seem to big — please revisit window and door sizes and proportions; ('� �.� � �>e, ;-; ,. ,, � � � , _ ., _�. ��c�ight of 2�d floor ��, . . ?�. , � . �� _,y, ,� .�: i . , ��,, , �v.� ��lier proportions and �� _� � i �s�..� �. _ . , � , � , _ � . � ,�'�", .:��id A4. • Window trim looks out of place, clarify if it is all new or matching existing; ','. ,,,,� ��; �i� _ . .. � � , • South elevation needs a lot of work, west and front elevation are well composed and elevation on the north is OK; R_ `:cu'rh � It°va��iun ha�, `,eF,i� r� i.�,et.1 uer corniner,ls. �2r:fer ��; �i�c� resNo��se abovc. • Window pattern seems different in the renderings please be consistent; [;_ �� -i<,.�� _ _ �Jn.� , � . _ �: :�; ;r � , • Verify window trim sizes existing trim maybe very small or 2 inch new trim at 4 inch please look at refining this trim detail. � � ;C� �'- >�r; �r�l�_ t°1�-1 � � � �. � .il' :_�'. , i � ils �� r_ c I � ,�i- arou�icl the doors/windows. Now tl�e trims have been reviseu to have 2x6 on tiie top and 2x4 at other sides. Ple�se ref�rto the elev��tions c�n ;heFt �3 an� A4. Please notice that there are no building footprint change at this round of revision. Sincerely Yours, �� RECEIVED MAR — 4 2022 Qing Gan (architect of this project) CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. � PLANNING APPLICATION BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—PLANNING DIVISION 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT(�BURLINGAME.ORG z 0 H a � � O LL Z F- c� w � 0 � a z 0 H a � � O � z f- Z d U J d Q a x � � W Z � O � O � Q 0 � � Q 1928 Devereux Drive 025212210 R-1 PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # IAPNI ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is a single-family home major remodel. Re-Iayout the ground floor and have a new entry. Add 2nd floor including a master suite. No round floor perimeter chan e No radin change. No baCkyard landscape chan e and no trees are proposed to be removed. Michael Liu PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT? (408) 896-2988 PHONE Qing Gan ARCHITECTIDESIGNER APPLICANT? (408) 480-6989 PHONE N/A BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # 1928 Devereux Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 ADDRESS mike858@yahoo.com E-MAIL 4973 Rio Vista Avenue, San Jose, CA 95129 ADDRESS gan.architects@gmail.com E•MAIL *FOR PROJECT REFUNDS' - Please provide an address to which to all refuntl checks will be mailed to: NAME ADDRESS , , I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. � ��2� APPLICANT'S SIG URE IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNER DATE I AM AWARE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING OMMISSION V N. � 7/�� PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE AUTHORIZATION TO REPRODUCE PLANS . . y_ . ... ._... . � .. .. �.. . . ___...._,. ,.., I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST ANDIOR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION (INITIALS OF ARCHITECTIDESIGNERI r J Z O W N � � � � � APPLICATION TYPE ❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) � DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) ❑ WIRELESS ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: , . _ _ ,...._.. ��'�,�� `6I �� i�J�_ � ��2� ,;:',IiY C�F BU�Lii�UA�IE. .��-��ac,��v►��G .r3�v DATE RECEIVED: ;� 'D � T C � rn 0 z r <� RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desi n Review for a first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle-unit dwellinq at 1928 Devereux Drive, Zoned R-1, Michael and Jiny Liu, propertv owners, APN: 025-122-270; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on May 23, 2022, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301(e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regula Planning Commission held on the 23�d dav of May, 2022 by the Burlingame, do r meeting of the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Effective June 2, 2022 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 12, 2022, sheets GO, A1.0 through A4.0, and site survey sheet; 2. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the left side setback at 3'- 3" where 5'-0" is required per code and measuring 21'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Side Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 3. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the front setback (garage wall) at 15'-3" where 35'-0" is required per code for a two-car attached garage and measuring 18'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Front Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf fl; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Effective June 2, 2022 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. �CITY Of BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH:(650)558-7250 www.burlingame.org Project Site: 1928 Devereux Drive, zoned R-1 The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following virtual public hearing via Zoom on Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:00 P.M. You may access the meeting online at www.zoom.usuoin or by phone ai (346)148-7799: MeetinglD: 836 1165 2905 Passcode: 492121 Description: Applicaiion for Design Review for a first and setond story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. Members of 1he public may provide written comments by email to: publiccommentCC�burlingame.org. Mailed: May 13, 2022 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin4ame - Public Hearing Notice If you have any questions about this application or would like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please send an email to planninsdeptCc�burlingame.org or call (650) 558-7250. Individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at planningdeptC�burlin�ame.or� or (650) 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director (Please refer to other side) 1928 Devereux Drive 300' noticing APN #: 025-212-270 .,; �-.� -,, c� � Q':� t� �� v� � ;�� .�� Q p �� a� �� p�, a � �; �, t` �� Q �`� W° Q �� . ,a� �� q?� �y Q L'-� �� Q� �ta � U �� ; �''�� Q �,�,�' = �� . , Q �� :� � � h� c � '�'� ; �J� �q ��`c% Q (�� . � � q'' Qa Q Q , � �� ,�n : � �� ,,�,� ;� � �� ., �' �v�,� 5 � q�,�C ;'��r,� ��v<`f r�� cr� ?Q � �(��`�`.s �7� �l �� O � 3f3�.'�C? z�4fJC �''�''f�3 �U+3a� `� ,, , �: _s� �' �� ,r, w �� c`?� p � t:• " c;� Q � .? c� � t� q '� ,v �, / C� �J�� d '� � C? �� n ��p � � Q� �,� �;� � �1 �° `�� a�� a�� c� -'�., . �>.�' c, h� �� 1.'� A,1�II . ;.��'Y e� v �'�'�� '�ts c� > � � �1 �bq a ��a v�� : � �a �� o � Q� � p��'.; � �`� �9� .� . � f q �. � � Q d a6 Q � Q� �� nG� �� t�: <%3`�` � < � � � --'" � q��' � c ; �� p �v �� C, ��7 ca �- �a �o � �,° �a �� a Q� w� Q� � � Q �� '� '�� d� Q c � Q �3 Q�` �� QQ Q� �Q �� ,a �4� �c� W C�! h .�.`V `; "4 ��D� �D�� o �� _ aa '�� ; v� Up D �G` d� � �!�G. C� p�}, C � �� v �� n � ��.,�� \ t.� � l�� i �� . h•�„� �, � � �� Q � �U . �,�� a Q ��t: �,� ` �. � �a�� ♦ City of Burlingame Design Review Item No. 8e Regular Action Item Address: 1928 Devereux Drive Meeting Date: March 14, 2022 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Qing Gan APN: 025-122-270 Property Owner: Michael Liu Lot Area: 5,500 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 {e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Note: This application was submitted prior to January 5, 2022, the effective date of the new Zoning Ordinance, and therefore was reviewed under the previous Zoning Code. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot. The existing one-story house with an attached garage contains 1,763 SF (0.32 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The proposed project includes a major remodel with new habitable space on the first floor that would be created by enclosing the existing covered porch; a new entry porch would be constructed at the front of the house. The second floor addition (936 SF) would add three bedrooms, two bathrooms and a laundry room. With the proposed project, the floor area would increase to 2,852 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes covered porch exemption). The existing front and left side garage walls are nonconforming with respect to front and left side setbacks (15'-3" existing front setback where 15'-4" is the block average and 3'-0" existing left side setback where 5'-0" is the minimum required). The nonconforming areas would not be modified as part of this project. The new construction proposed along the right side and front of the house (towards right side) would comply with the required setbacks. With this application, the number of potential bedrooms would increase from two to four. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage (17'-6" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) provides one covered parking space; one uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). _ Left blank intentionally. Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive 1928 Devereux Drive Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: March 4, 2022 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS _ ......._ ,.... . _... . _... ......_. Front (15t flr): 21'-6" 16'-5" (to new porch) ; 15'-4" (block average) �Znd flr): N/A 26'-7" 20'-0„ (attached garage): 15'-3"' No change 35'-0" ; ...................................._..................................................................................................._..................................._... ...................................................................................... . Side (left): 3'-0"' No change 5'-0" (right): 5'-2" No change 5'-0" Rear (15t flr): 31'-3" No change (deck <30") 15'-0" �2nd flr): N/A 29'-3" 20'-0" _. ..................._........................................... .................... . .........:................._...._.......................................................................................................... __.. ;........................................._ ... ............ ...................................................................... ......... ........................................ .. ......................................... ...... . . . Lot Coverage: 1,907 SF 1,977 SF 2,200 SF 34.6% 35.9% 40% _ ......................__ _ ............ ...............................................................................................................................................:...._............................................................................................................................. ..................................... ........................................................................... . .. , , FAR: 1,763 SF 2,852 SF 2,860 SF 2 0.32 FAR 0.51 FAR 0.52 FAR _ .............................................._..._...................._ _.......;................................................................................................_....................................._;.................................................._....................................................._.................. . # of bedrooms: 2 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (17'-6" x 20'-0") No change (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Building Height: 17'-7" 26'-8" 30'-0" DH Envelope: Not applicable complies C.S. 25.26.075(b)(2) ' Existing nonconforming front and left side setbacks to be retained; if removed durinq construction will need to complv with current setback reauirements or apply for Variances 2 (0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) The revised plans, date stamped March 4, 2022, have no changes that affect the development standards listed in the above table. Staff Comments: None. Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: aluminum clad wood with simulate true divided lites • Doors: wood garage door • Siding: stucco with fiber cement panel and batten at gables • Roof.• composition shingles • Ofher: wood knee braces; 2x6 wood trim around windows 2 Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting on February 28, 2022, the Commission had several concerns/suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached February 28, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes). The following is a summary of the Commission's main concerns: • Front Elevation shows pre-fabricated columns, appear to be vinyl - either change to wood or fiberglass; • Windows on second floor, north elevation are not shown on the floor plan (bathroom number two) and they appear to be too small with not much glazing - revisit size of windows; • South Elevation needs work - issue with scale and blank wall on South side; south patio door at landing has a blank wall - consider adding a roof eave over the door to break up that elevation; • Consider extending the roof over bathroom number one at the back of the patio door to help with the scale; • Window sizes seem too big — please revisit window and door sizes and proportions; • Window pattern seems different in the renderings please be consistent; and • Verify window trim sizes (new or existing) - window trim looks out of place - existing trim may be very small, please look at refining this trim detail. The applicant submitted a response letter (see attachments) and revised plans, date stamped March 4, 2022 to address the Planning Commission's concerns. In summary the following changes were made, but please referto the applicanYs attached response letter for a full detail of all changes: • Front columns changed to fiberglass; • North Elevation — bathroom #2 windows increased in size (glazing); • Window proportions revised; • South Elevation — window added to the guest bedroom (1 St floor) and wood trellis added above window and patio door; and • Window trim sizes revised (increased). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. SuggesfedFindings forDesign Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the proposed addition has been designed to be integrated into the existing structure and to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood; that the architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed materials include upgrades to the existing materials with brick veneer, fiberglass columns, wood garage door, fiber cement panels and batten, aluminum clad wood windows, and composition shingles. For these reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 3 Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 4, 2022, sheets GO, A1.0 through A4.0, and site survey sheet; 2. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the left side setback at 3'-0" where 5'- 0" is required per code and measuring 21'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Side Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 3. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the front setback (garage wall) at 15'- 3" where 35'-0" is required per code for a two-car attached garage and measuring 18'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Front Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; � Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSP�CTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Qing Gan, applicant and architect Michael Liu, prope�ty owner Attachments: February 28, 2022 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated March 4, 2022 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 4, 2022 Area Map � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existing sinctle-unit dwellinq at 1928 Devereux Drive, Zoned R-1, Michael and Jinq Liu, propertv owners, APN: 025-122-270; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 14, 2022, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301(e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is hereto. Findings for such of said meeting. approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th dav of March, 2022 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Effective March 24, 2022 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 4, 2022, sheets GO, A1.0 through A4.0, and site survey sheet; 2. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the left side setback at 3'- 0" where 5'-0" is required per code and measuring 21'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Side Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 3. that the existing nonconforming wall and foundation, located within the front setback (garage wall) at 15'-3" where 35'-0" is required per code for a two-car attached garage and measuring 18'-0" in length, shall not be removed during construction; if any wall studs or foundation, or both, along the existing nonconforming length are removed during construction, either an application for a Front Setback Variance will be required to replace the wall at the same location or an application for a Design Review Amendment will be required showing compliance with current setback requirements; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf fl; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive Effective March 24, 2022 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. (apis �ay�o o� �a�a� asna�d) ao��a�ia �uawdo�anao A;iunuawo� d�lb''aauipaeg uina� •a��ou siy; �noqe s�ueua� �iay� �uiw�o�ui �o} a�qisuodsa� a�e a�you siy; ania�aa oynn s�aunno /��adoad ��uiaeay �i�qnd ay� o� �oiad �o �e �(�i� ay} o� paaani�ap a�uapuodsaa�o� ua�iann ui �o a��ou ay� ui paqia�sap '�ui�eay �i�qnd ay� �e pasie� as�a auoawos ao no�( sanssi asoy� �l�uo �uisiea o} pa�iwi� aq �(ew noA '��no� ui (s)uo�eai�dde ��afqns ay� a�ua��ey� no�t �� u�aaw ay� �o �ep ay} uo �.ue Ot �q OSZL-855 (059) ao ao•awe ui��nq � ap uiuue� ;e uoisinia �uiuue�d ay} ��e�uo� p�noys `pa�nqi��sip aq /�ew �ey� s�u�iann aay�o �o �a��ed epua�e 'a��ou �u�aaua `epua�e ay� ao� }euaao; an�euaa;�e ue ;sanba� o; ysinn pue A�i�iqesip e aney oynn ao '2u�aaw siy� ui a;edi�uaed o� uo�epowwo»e �o uoue��ipow pa�e�aa-/��i�iqesip e ao a�ue�sisse �ei�ads a�mba� oynn s�enpinipu� 'OSZL-855 (059) II�� o ao•awe ui�.anq � ap uiuue� o� �iewa ue puas asea�d `sue�d pue uoue�i�dde ay� �o /�do� p�ey e nnain o� auaui;uiodde ue a�npay�s o� a�i� p�nonn ao uot�e�i�dde siy� �noqe suo�sanb �tue aney no�( �� a��oN u►avaH �►�qnd - acun u��an8 0�� (apis �ay}o o� aa{a� asna�d) aaoa "6 4»oyy �pa�ioW 3�IlON �ruiad3H �nend • �o•awo up�nq �uawwo»i�qn :u� yowa Aq s�uawwo� ua��uM apino�d 6nw �i�qnd ey� }o s�aqwayy �6ui��aMp �iun-a�6ws 6ui�sixa uo o� uoi�ippo A�o�s puo�as o ao� Mainay u6isaa �o} uoi�o�gddn :uoi;di��saa 8£ti019 �apo�ssnd L l8b L096 8S8 �al 6ui�aayy �66LL-9bl �96£) �q auoyd Aq io wo. sn•wooz•Mn►M �o aui�uo 6ui�aaw ay� ssa»o Aow noA 'W'd OO�L }n LZOL 'ti L q�apW 'AopuoW uo wooZ oin 6ui�oay �i�qnd �un�au 6uiMo��o� ay} sa�unouuo uoissiwwo� 6uiuuo�d awo6w��n8 �o A}i� ayl �-a peuoz'eniaa xnaaaned gZ6l �a}!S }�e��ad ��o•awe8ui��nq•mmm OSZL-855 (059) �Hd h�� Oi0b6b'�'3Wd9Nilafl8 'i .�AC°'� �1 adoa 3soawiad ios 3wv�N�;arie 1N3W12ldd301N3WdOl3A341.LIN(1WW0� � 3Wb'9NI121(19�OAlIJ � 1928 Devereux Drive 300' noticing APN #: 025-212-270 �} u'1J ✓ � �� a� b � �' b� �v Qa p� b� �� , a ��, v � p� q � � ,�U �o . � �� Q �� Q� q� a�' � � �,�� , Q ��' �� Q �U � q �' tj"�a ��q �C�' ,..,,YJ� � , �� p� b , ��y w �w h q C� � J�� ta �� c q' � �.. y � � � �� '� n Q t� � � Qq c� n� �� . �� r � '�' q`� ��C� �� C`� r�C�'� t v7� � �� 9 �,��'• "` c�� <�� fl;�;�' 3f3��G �4'J�� . �� t� � � � � � � tW � �' C'� p L' �J � �� ► � � � / ��o� � � � � � �� d � � � ��p �^ � � �- Q� ��, �� b� Q� a�� a�a � �, . ��.�' c�, t�a �� a.�,�� . ,:. � �� e�' � ��'� �' rft P > � h n � �dq a ��4`� a � � �: �� pd p�0 � � ��Q u� ' ' � �'� C,, �`ii � d a� q U'°�?`� Q� �G�4j� �3� � `� � n � c�.F (;j� p � - qd�a � ' t .; � �� p � � �� v �a� �� p�� 9a Q� Qa�� ° Q �`� a Q� �� ' �� a �� Q � a�� a Q� �. �Q� � Q �� q� � �d �� c: �:,Q a�� n4 f�� a. . v� �a� D��C d �� G d d� C � �O `O � J � � ;� h� ��•� �'' ��}�;A��.nv �-•:noo� Q� . J q Uti �� a Q° �ct: Q'7 q � � ao4 Item No. 9d Design Review Study City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1928 Devereux Drive Meeting Date: February 28, 2022 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Qing Gan APN: 025-122-270 Property Owner: Michael Liu Lot Area: 5,500 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Note: This application was submitted prior to January 5, 2022, the effective date of the new Zoning Ordinance, and therefore was reviewed under the previous Zoning Code. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot. The existing one-story house with an attached garage contains 1,763 SF (0.32 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The proposed project includes a major remodel with new habitable space on the first floor that would be created by enclosing the existing covered porch; a new entry porch would be constructed at the front of the house. The second floor addition (936 SF) would add three bedrooms, two bathrooms and a laundry room. With the proposed project, the floor area would increase to 2,852 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The existing front and left side garage walls are nonconforming with respect to front and left side setbacks (15'- 3" existing front setback where 15'-4" is the block average and 3'-0" existing left side setback where 5'-0" is the minimum required). The nonconforming areas would not be modified as part of this project. The new construction proposed along the right side and front of the house (towards right side) would comply with the required setbacks. With this application, the number of potential bedrooms would increase from two to four. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage (17'-6" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions) provides one covered parking space; one uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All otherZoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 1928 Devereux Drive Lot Size: 5.500 SF Plans date stamped: February 15, 2022 EXISTING SETBACKS Front (15� flr): /Znd fIP�: (aftached garage): Side (left): (right): 21'-6" N/A 15'-3"' PROPOSED 16'-5" (to new porch) 26'-7" No change ALLOWED/REQ'D 15'-4" (block average) 20'-0" 35'-0" 3'-0" ' 5'-2" No change No change 5'-0" 5'-0" ' Existing nonconforming front and left side setbacks to be retained; if removed durinp construction will need to comqlv with current setback requirements or applv for Variances. Design Review 1928 Devereux Drive 1928 Devereux Drive Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: Februa 15, 2022 � EXISTING PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQ'D � Rear (1St flr): 31'-3" ; No change (deck <30") i 15'-0" ------......--------------------------------------�2"°' flr):._ ....-�---------�-----�- N/A �I 29'-3" � 20'-0„ � -----------------------� ......-��----.1....-------�---..._.....------------------------------�---------------------------------�a----�------............_...._...._.......................-----�---........---- Lot Coverage: 1,907 SF � 1,977 SF � 2,200 SF 34.6% ! 35.9% I 40% .....- -.._......---�----------------------�� -�---------------------------........ ...- --�--�------�---�---�-._...-�--��--------------��------------....--�--..1.� ----�-----........ �-�-�---------------�� --------�---�-----.....................1........_...........-�----�---..........-------------------------........_.... -... FAR: 1,763 SF ; 2,852 SF ; 2,860 SF 2 0.32 FAR ! 0.51 FAR ! 0.52 FAR -------------------------------- ----------_..-�---�------------------�--.....- --------- ------ ..._.._.._....----------------------------------�-------------a-----�----- ------------------- ------..........-------------------------...........-- � � ...-- - ...--�--------------......................-�---�-----�--.........- � � # of bedrooms: 2 ; 4 t --- � �-�-�----�---�-----�-------------------------�- -��----------------------........-- ---------�---------------�------------------------..........-------...........,---------...........------�----------��---�--....... �---- ---- --� - ...................._1..........--� �-� --�---------..._._.......----------------------...--�---�------.... Off-Street Parking: 1 covered i � 1 covered (17'-6" x 20'-0") i No change j (10' x 20') 1 uncovered � 1 uncovered (9' x 20') � � (9' x 20') ........--�--------------------�-----...__..--------------........_......--��----- ------...............__......_.......-� -...........----............ _................... �---------- ..._......__..----------..............--�---------------� �--------------------�----_.........-------------..... �--- �-� � ��-------...---- Building Height: 17'-7" � 26'-8" ; 30'-0" � -------------------�--....................-�--- --.........-- �� -� �--� �- -� .................. �- �- ... -� �-��-�----� ...._..---._...._..._.._....._..--------------.............----�---------------��----------.............._..... � --.................................-------��---- DH Envelope: Not applicable I complies � C.S. 25.26.075(b)(2) 2 (0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) Staff Comments: None. Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: aluminum clad wood with simulate true divided lites • Doors: wood garage door • Siding: stucco with fiber cement panel and batten at gables • Roof: composition shingles • Other, wood knee braces; 2x6 wood trim around windows Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 2 Design Review Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. Qing Gan, applicant and architect Michael Liu, property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 18, 2022 Area Map 1928 Devereux Drive 3 � ' PLANNING APPLICATION BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—PLANNING DIVISION 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 � TEL: 650.558.7250 FAX: 650.696.3790 E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT BURLINGAME.ORG I I Z y 1928 Devereux Drive 025212210 R-1 �` PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL #(APN) ZONING f— : � ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION o' This project is a single-family home major remodel. Re-layout the ground floor and have a new entry. Add 2nd floor � z�: �, ; including a master suite. No ground floor perimeter change. No grading change. No backyard landscape change, U : �: and no trees are proposed to be removed. 0 � �.. � a ,. _ ,,. ..... Michael Liu 1928 Devereux Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT? ADDRESS z ; (408) 896-2988 mike858@yahoo.com O ' PHONE E-MAIL H ': a" Qin Gan 4973 Rio Vista Avenue, San Jose, CA 95129 �. g � : ARCHITECTIDESIGNER APPLICANT? ADDRESS O � Z ` (408) 480-6989 gan.architects@gmail.com � . PHONE E-MAIL Z N/A a V ' BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # J d Q' *FOR PROJECT REFUNDS* - Please provide an address to which to all refund checks will be mailed to: � NAME ADDRESS <� o->� I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY � �' KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Z � ��2� � APPLICANT'S SIG URE IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNER DATE � � I AM AWARE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION AND HE EBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE �. Q'; PLANNING OMMISSION V N. o; 7fgl� �: Q'_ PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE AUTHORIZATION TO REPRODUCE PLANS . I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST AND/OR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS ` '' APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING : ; OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION (INITIALS OF ARCHITECTIDESIGNER) ..�._,_...:W_ , . .:: __ _ _ � __ �.._: ._ .,_. .. W. ..._ J APPLICATION TYPE � � � � � � � � � Z❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) y �'` ❑ CONDITIONALUSEPERMIT(CUP) ❑ WIRELESS ,IUL � ZOZ� c _�� DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION ` m �`; ❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ OTHER: �i_;�i' CiF BL�RLINGAME o � : ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION U��-PLP,��IV41��G �!V ` � N❑ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) DATE RECEIVED: � ,.�.�....._.,...__.. ..� _. ,_ . _. .__._. _ _.. _r.....�_ . .,. ' CITY Of BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURUNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �" PH:(650)558-7250 www.burlingame.org Project Site: 1928 Devereux Drive, zoned R-1 The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following virtual public hearing via Zoom on Monday, February 28, 2022 at 7:00 P.M. You may actess the meeting online at www.zoom.usfjoin or by phone at (346) 248-7199: Meeting ID: 8Y3 3303 5851 Passcode: 913110 Description: Application for Design Review for a first and second stary addition to an existing single unit dwelling. Members of the puhlic may provide written comments by email to: publiccomment(p�burlingame.ora. Moiled: february 1 S, 2022 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Cit�of Burlinaame - Public Hearina Notice If you have any questions about this application or would like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please send an email to planningdeptC�burlin�ame.ors or call (650) 558-7250. Individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed, should contact the Planning Division at plannin�deqtC�burlinsame.or� or (650) 558-7250 by 10 am on the day of the meeting. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director (Please refer to otherside) 1928 Devereux Drive 300' noticing APN #: 025-212-270 c�''' �q� �'�'` t� �� v c� �," �-` �4 � � �v� �a� � t�� G' Q� Ct' ��D� ��r; �a� � �� ,}� �Q c�°�d r�'�' bp � � - �C o`v � p� 41� ,a t�� , q . Q �y� �� a wo aa a � c� � c, � a U r�� Q �� , � ca � � v � C,, � � � a Q � d � G � �� :�� , � V � �� L• �p d U``� ��G � Q � � �� Q� ` ,�� c `a�..r� r � � Q��CJ D � p � ,vp �. �� r?� J U � � , � � V �� a h� Q� 1� � v .� : � � � '�� ..f� -� +� ��..i�� J �� pb � q � �. '`r.� �'� rq�}' � �� . t,,,�,i Y/ V'i� ��,'I� U�-. � �. ta ` �G q3 �� 7� � �" ' " �� fj��^ �� b ' ' q� �� h � �f �� q q4 �� `" .�� JF:�� ?�, ,, � �e; ��, �' �c7r, .,�`' �,,, � �� `��?�; � �.�, � � , . � ,3 � �. a`� 4��C� ��, `� �� p. �'1 �� fi � �-.��j p�-'z�� a��.�c' �L�� 7� ��''� ��c�,� p� �� p � �i��, � ��;,. � '�� a� �d �� 3f3�'?(�` �4�J� � �'J��; `��`'�7,: �J ��'�� , �b�J c� �4,�' r;. �� , �S`� w, � ��'� � J �`� �' ��. � ��. ,. �G o � � �� ; �a � � ��: : Q� C� p - �� J w � ��v' p ��a � ��Q �'� , � � �; � � t7 ab �.1 � �J'`� � �� u Q p �,Q� t� q� G�`> n�� v � �� ta � C� � 4'� . 4 ca� �G'7 � 4 � � . �. . �� c�.= C:} p ( � �U � ��, � O � ., , ' � �� ' � t� �.i i�---- -- Q� In .. � ,� �; _ _ _,_ ._ _ �� . �(s,•� �v �� Op �C� pd c� �g G� Q� �c� o � � � � q Qa �� Q Q� � � v �`�� p �� Qc� �� 4`'� Q Q � �� {' q� G�' ,5� Q � �� Q "�J p U c�� a Q �� q� �� ' �?�, a � a � ^ � • ��' p�^c � `-'�� . �>�' h h� �� d u��' �� . �