The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1613 Coronado Way - Staff ReportItem No. 8e Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 1613 Coronado Way City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1613 Coronado Way Meeting Date: February 11, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Jerry Deal, Jerry Deal Associates Property Owner: Gregory Button General Plan: Low Density Residential Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The existing single-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 1,917 SF (0.34 FAR). The proposed project includes adding a new second story that would increase the floor area to 2,858 SF (0.52 FAR), where 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed as per the zoning code. The proposed project is 2 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The existing house is nonconforming in lot coverage, in part due to existing trellises along the right side and rear of the house (2,544 SF, 46.3% existing where 2,200 SF, 40% is the maximum allowed). With this application, a portion of the existing trellis (5 SF) would be removed, which would reduce the lot coverage to 2,539 SF (46.1 %). A variance for lot coverage is not required in this case because there is no increase in lot coverage proposed with this application (Code Section 25.54.020). The existing house contains three bedrooms and with the proposed project the number of bedrooms would increase to four (storage room on second floor does not qualify as a bedroom since it is only accessible through the master bedroom). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The existing garage (10'-10" x 34'-8" clear interior dimensions) provides one covered parking space. One uncovered parking space (9'-0" x 20'-0") is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: Item No. 8e Regular Action Item APN: 025-203-130 Lot Area: 5,500 SF Zoning: R-1 ■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) �2))• 1613 Coronado Way Lot Size: 5.500 SF Plans date stamped: January 15, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Fronf (15f flr): �2nd flr): Side (left): Rear (1St flr): �2nd fl�): 15'-0" NA 4�....��;... 4'-0" 28'-6„ NA no change 35'-4'/z„ no change no chanqe no change 42'-5" 15'-0" or block average 20'-0" or block average 4-0" 4-0" 15'-0" 20'-0" Design Review 1613 Coronado Way 1613 Coronado Way Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: Janua 15, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Lot Coverage: 2,544 SF' 2,539 SF2 2,200 SF 46.2% � 46.1 % 40% ! _ _ ........................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................................ . . FAR: 1,917 SF j 2,858 SF � 2,860 SF3 0.34 FAR 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR � . , # of bedrooms: 3 i 4 ' --- , ; ............................................................................................................................................:................................................................................................................._................................. 1 covered I ! 1 covered Off-Sfreet Parking: (10'-10" x 34'-8") � ' (10' x 20') 1 uncovered no change i 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') 1... . � ... . ...................................................................................................................................... I Building Height: 15'-3" 28'-1" 30'-0" ; P...............................................................................................................................................�.................................................................................................................................................... DH Envelope: complies complies � CS 25.26.075 ' Existing non-conforming lot coverage. z Variance not required since there is no increase in lot coverage. 3(0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on November 26, 2018, the Commission had several suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached November 26, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes). Please refer to the attached meeting minutes for a complete list of concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. The applicant submitted a response letter dated January 24, 2019, and revised plans date stamped January 15, 2019, for responses to the Commission's comments and a detailed summary of changes made to the project since the design review study meeting. Planning staff would note that with the revised plans, the master bathroom and storage room on the second floor was enlarged by 132 SF, increasing the proposed FAR to 2,858 SF where 2,860 SF is the maximum allowed. In addition, by changing the roof configuration from a sloped roof to a flat roof, the overall building height decreased by 1'-1 ", from 29'-2" to 28'-1 ". Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 2 Design Review 1613 Coronado Way Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring flat roofs, proportional plate heights, a combination of stucco and horizontal and vertical wood siding, roof eave fascia, and aluminum clad wood windows with wood trim) is compatible with the existing house and character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 15, 2019, sheets A-1 through A-7, L1, SF, GBM and BMP; 2. that the planters and landscape privacy screening on the second floor deck shall be installed as shown on the Proposed Second Floor Plan and shall be maintained in proper working order to sustain the privacy screening; that the building permit shall include a planting and irrigation plan for the planters located on the second floor deck; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; � Design Review 1613 Coronado Way THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Planning Manager c. Jerry Deal, applicant and designer Gregory Button, property owner Attachments: November 26, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated January 24, 2019 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 1, 2019 Area Map 4 CITY �� ; � � ;� ��" -'.,,. �� Y �-, o CO q +�i 'Paowsr City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers a. 1613 Coronado addition to an and designer; Aggarwal Way, zoned R-1- Application for Design Review for a second story existing single family dwelling. (J Deal Assocaites, Jerry Deal, applicant Gregory Button, property owner) (129 noticed) Staff Contact: Sonal Commissioner Tse was recused from this item as she has a business relationship with the next door neighbor who submitted a letter of concern regarding the project. All Commissioners had visited fhe project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Jerry Deal, represented fhe applicant, along with Gregory Button, property owner. Commission Questions/Comments: > House has a nice, modern feel to it in terms of fhe firsf floor roof. Roof over living spaces is striking in ferms of a sing/e, flat plane that covers the first floor. It has more depfh to it than one can perceive from the drawings. Nave you considered replicating that theme to have a big sweeping roof on fhe second floor? The proposed gable seems a bit foreign because of the sirength of the first floor roof. Could a/so have deep roof overhangs on the second floor fhaf wouldn't couni fowards lot coverage because it wou/d be a roof over a roof. (Deal: Could look at changing to f/at roofs on second f/oor. Would prefer to have f/at roofs at different heights.) > Simplicity of roof forms and corner windows give the house a nice feel. > Have you spoken to the neighbor to the /eft regarding the rear pafio? (Button: Have spoken to the neighbor, indicated that she did not have any privacy concerns with the proposed addition. Her house backs up fo my property and pool is located on other side of house. Have been on roof and you can't see the pool and patio area from roof.) > Concerned fhat a spray foam roof will not look good on a pitched/gab/e roof, however if roof is flattened then it may not be visible and wou/d alleviate concern. > In master bathroom there is a French door out to roof, but no railing is shown. Were you intending to provide a railing or Juliette balcony? If it is a door, mosf like/y will need some sort of railing to comp/y with building code requirements. (Deal: Original intent was to provide a large window, but not to be used as a door. A/so needs access to the roof for maintenance. Will look into changing door fo an opaque window in consideration of the privacy concerns expressed by the neighbor to fhe right.) > What is the purpose of having such a large roof deck off the master bedroom? Concerned with privacy and noise issues. (Button: Would like to have a seafing area to have a cup of coffee in the morning. Root deck would only be accessible through fhe master bedroom. Would be a beautiful area with landscaping, including vines and planfs. Interested in making the space private and providing privacy for the neighbors . There is extensive existing foliage that makes it hard to see anything. Attempted to contact neighbors to left, but have been out of the county so have not been able to discuss the project with them yet.) > Have you /ooked at living roofs? One examp/e is a system using trays of succulents that interlock. Perhaps the roof deck can be combined with a living roof. CityofBurlingame peye � Printed on 2/4/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 26, 2018 > Also concerned with large roof deck, larger than what we've been allowing recent/y. Could be distracfing if there is a large gathering on the deck, especially at night. Would be /ess concemed if it's well landscaped with permanent landscaping. (Button: If you were sfanding on the deck right now and making noise, not sure where peop/e would hear if from. Patio of neighbor to left is located on the other side of their house; the proposed second floor addition would block noise to neighbor on right side. Feel roof deck is su�cienfly set back from everyone.) Houses are built c/ose together, still fee/ something should be done to address privacy and noise concerns. > Have you spoken to the neighbor on the right? (Button: Yes, noted that he didn'f have any objections. Will coordinafe with him further.) > Gable roof seems out of place. Additional corners created on second floor aren't necessary, could just be a simp/e rectangle with a flat roof, perhaps the center gefs popped up. (Deal: Could move bathroom wall at fronf of house so fhat it aligns with fhe staircase and fill in the area.) > Encourage a simp/e roof with deep overhangs in certain places, with a play of shadows on that depth. > Roof deck is approximately 175 SF; typically have asked applicants to limit to 100 SF. However, in previous projecfs applicanfs have added planter boxes on deck to soften perimefer and reduce usable area of deck; prevents people from standing at the railing. (Button: Like suggestion, would allow for desired vegetation on roof deck.) > Revise p/ans to show landscaping on roof deck. Public Comments: There were no public commenfs. Chair Gaul closed fhe public hearing. Commission Discussion.� > Feel clear direction has been provided, don'f see too many changes needed. Commissioner Loftis made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- Sargent, Loftis, Comaroto, Gaul, and Terrones Absent: 1 - Kelly Recused: 1- Tse City of Burlingame peye p Printed on 2/4/2019 J Deal Associates / JDA 337:�,. �€.a�h �2.c1 ��►s-��n�.��c:, t':� 94O�tl Tele: �; ;;.;-t, ;'�7.- ° ;' �`�? E-m a:1: office��j dealassociates. com �'��e!_,si:.e www.jdealassociates.com 1-24-2019 To: Burlingame Planning Commission Y�esid�ntial D�si�n Additions ! [Ze��c��els �`ustom Home Designs '�lterior Design / Remodels �p�er<y�� C�i�servation / Green � F, t.' 'A �'�' S 4 ? Y.' Ji J ., i..,_....4� .., tr.N'c � �4^� � t�:i� ! ='\' i `_° �,i l �' i � Re: 1613 Coronado Way -��_:-.•; �_;;�- �,; �,� �'��';� ti'F . i :. l—. : : :, \ / � . . . I ... . . In response to comments troin the Planning Commission and f'rom the owner several changes have been made to the drawings. � 4 5. The gable roof has been removed and replaced with a flat roof similar to other the other flat roofs on the new second floor but with a higher plate height. Some of the second floor overhangs have been increased Landscaping has been added to the second floor deck off the second t7oor rnaster bedroom which would screen the area from adjacent properties The French door which was previously at the second floor bathroom has been changed to a standard window. The recess that appears on the second floor front elevation was not enclosed as suggested as it would eliminate its usefulness as a"bed wall". As per an Owner request the following changes / additions have been made 6. The second floor master bath has been increased in size and now includes a stacking washer and dryer, linen cabinet and a stone tub. 7. The storage area has been increased in size 8. A screen has been added to hide the second floor condenser and is compatible with the architectural style Sincerely, J��.�. %�� Jerry Deal Principal JDeal Associates i ' !^!9w►ic COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLIN(3AME, CA 94070 p: 650.668.7260 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION T� THE PLANNING COMMISSlON Type of application: �E4 Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 025-203-130 ❑ Conditional Use Permit O Special Permit � Other: 1� � PROJECT ADDRESS: 1613 CORONADO WAY � Please indicate the corrtact person for this project APPLICANT project conmct person 181 OK to aend electronic copiea of documents ISI Name: J DEAL ASSOCIATES Address: 337 BEACH ROAD, SUITE A CitylState2ip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 Phone: (650) 697 -1370 Fax: E-mai�: office@jdealassociates.com PROPERTY OWNER �q�r �t�e �r�«, o OK to send electronic copiea of documents � Name: GREGORY BUTTON Address: 1613 CORONADO WAY City/StatelZip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 (650) 703-2387 Phone: Fax: E-mail: ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project oontact parson 1� OK to send electronic oopies of documents �d Name: J DEAL ASSOCIATES Address: 337 BEACH ROAD, SUITE A City/State2ip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 Phone: (650) 697 -1370 k �` ,�, t `�' ' � �� Fax: E-mail: office@jdealassociates.com -� � ` � - - � . ,�;-.,,�,,.-M1;_ _ . � C:, �',�. ,k Buriingam� Business Lioense #: 05755 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: First floor remodel & second floor addition AFFADAVfT1SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given f best of my knowledge and belief. r Applicant's signature: , �'� ;�� t-c, `e( t� (.— Date: > < I am aware of the proposed application ereby authorize the above applicant to submit this Commission. Property owne�'s signature: �� '''��- Date: C Z�lo%I� Date n is t e and correct to the �?/ I�Cat n to the Planning * Verlficatlon that the proJect a�chltect/designer has a valid Burlingame buslness Ilcense wll! be requlred by the Finance DepaRmer�t at the time appiication tees ara pald. o Please rtwrk one box above with an X to indicate tl�e corrtact person for this project S:1HandoutslPC Application 2008-B.handout ��0��a.�o� a�d;-�;o� -�b� ��5�� r I�evi�e�..> --�p✓ � l A � ex � s-hk� 1J�i�v. 1�1�Prw �OvSiT �a � ci �v • 1 � cz se��1 5 ��? l� � r.:,� �r� JD �I s� � cl�,� c I I� � � /�-ss�� ,� -k S RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desi n Review for a second story addition to an existinq sinale familv dwellinq at 1613 Coronado Way, Zoned R-1. Gregory Button, property owner, APN: 025-203-130; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Februanr 11, 2019, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; � NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th dav of February, 2019, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1613 Coronado Way Effective February 22, 2019 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 15, 2019, sheets A-1 through A-7, L1, SF, GBM and BMP; 2. that the planters and landscape privacy screening on the second floor deck shall be installed as shown on the Proposed Second Floor Plan and shall be maintained in proper working order to sustain the privacy screening; that the building permit shall include a planting and irrigation plan for the planters located on the second floor deck; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBiT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1613 Coronado Way Effective February 22, 2019 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BU,RLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �,, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �`'� +�� ' • PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 � www.burlin ame.or 9 9 Site: 1613 CORONADO WAY The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2019 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1613 CORONADO WAY zaned R-l. APN 015-203-130 Mailed: February 1, Z019 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � � �� £'r�� V u �'f''�,� � Q�Q Q ��, . aQF�'Q r��a ' r� �3 �CS D c�' �u' �'�� 'd -" � �'Q `PZ}` � ��9 � �'�7'3 ��,�L �� bJ�� f�,�G� ��' �� a cu�', �� 'f ?`�,,I3 �c�a ��a � ��°a q�`�p o �� ,� a � '�a�� ``. " �`'� �� ,o. n. �'�' �a �,� o c�,, �`� �� '�� c�� w`�� G+ � £� J�C{ ��fs �• ��G�� :' � �^t �Q qC�r' � � a'�a ��'a °`--��'a , �- ��„��' .,� �'�'sQ ,�a�' U ,�, a�a �Q,�Q �o�� .��c-:Q� �;g � �, �q,�; �� ,o�Q ��x; ,'� ,� �� ";��a�, �� ,°" � CS f Q��> r �Q . '�0 , � �. C:Q ��j;) ;a n� � � a�� ' o�� `�y , �� <� "° ,� , . �� oG ��Q�„ � ! �Q � ,yd �� o�� p� ;; ,�o, q . dQ , ,, Q �� .� � � . aQ o� qE �- � r a Q��",�Y ��,. � - � �°�"`"' �� , �� F,Q r :,,N � � .!;'��,,,� �fi� "'t<' � '� �Q �, 6�� ' `��a. '�, �'� C.} a � �s ` �r'(�'"''"„� `' C7,�."",.; p� O� ��51`` r -. _ m. ��J"� �� ,,t,r' f�* �� "� �?� ",7` Ca 'd p "k*� ,�>. a ,• �, � ' Q, q q� ,�Q r D ��° �+'!3 �x'Q s p; t� ` a �DQ �, � aQ ?�Q� {,aQ � ft' ��2 Q r a «�,, '73 ��,Q, y,s� �G', : °,�5,'� �,� ��Q�`913�, ' �,, a QC+1��.,, ;�} p�, ;'' q� , 4 �' �,Q J , d'� �Q �;{ ��'a..�;�„ � ��'��, (��Ir ,rT � _.''-bk 4rs�a�,., 4�C` L� � ��L� ,�''s� ' �,,"�� '�'a y�'`� �° `��`' CS�� ,xga� �� Q �`}L� �C�r.� �"^g '��Q r E ��y"�Q : G��{�`'�-� a+ !S yD�� J�� ' ' � Qe��.., ��Q � � � ,, a�� C1�� ', J�j�'3 >Q t]�� ,,r.. � ,�r{ �d."� ',� �i'�,�`'�,x.;m��, ��,� ��O�Q C R x,,. �`�'a ��G � �1 vf��l3 �� a`I y G +��a �C�� a��[ ��a - - �� °�,? �/ Qr�� , ��Q c�Q�a �,�� a � a �,�� aQa �� e� ��'� �a�Q �� 4 �F��a Q� J � �!�"� ��fi� ��E ��Q �S r' t� � :3 a Lx O M Q��JGy pcS^FjQ - ��Q � r. �� -�.'Q C��Q � c c�a �,��Q � r�� .,e�Q Q�� o � N .y� � 3aQQ ��a �d ��e, �� ''�� o -a c� z � - � ' � ��Q �'�c d � � a ��,� v � � ��✓�� q° � `�� U�'� ��'� p�a �t�., a � o Z � aQ� �,`� � aa .� a�'�� £'�i� Q�� U cc o a a c� �a �p U� ��a � � r� Q � � � a .. _ •?a .. �'Q �n o�_ Item No. 9a Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 1613 Coronado Way � City of Burlingame Design Review Item No. 9a Design Review Study Address: 1613 Coronado Way Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Jerry Deal, Jerry Deal Associates Property Owner: Gregory Button General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 025-203-130 Lot Area: 5,500 SF Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 1,917 SF (0.34 FAR). The proposed project includes adding a new second story that would increase the floor area to 2,726 SF (0.49 FAR), where 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed as per the zoning code. The proposed project is 134 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The existing house is nonconforming in lot coverage due to trellises at the rear and side of the house 2,544 SF (46.3%) existing where 2,200 SF (40%) is the maximum allowed. With this application, a portion of the trellis (5 SF) would be removed, which would reduce the lot coverage to 2,539 SF (46.1 %). A variance for lot coverage is not required in this cause because there is no increase in lot coverage proposed with this application (C.S 25.54.020) The existing house contains three bedrooms and with the proposed project the number of bedrooms would increase to four (storage room does not qualify as a bedroom since it is only accessible through the master bedroom. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The existing garage (10'-10" x 34'-8" clear interior dimensions) provides one covered parking space. One uncovered parking space (9'-0" x 20'-0") is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling (CS 25.57.010 (a) �2))• 9613 Coronado Way Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: November 14, 2018 EXISTING PROPOSED ; ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS _......._. .............__._.....---......................__..._..._ ................._........_....................................................................................................:......................_._. _._ ............................._.................._.............._.......,....._.........__...................._............_.........._........_...._._........_................_..._......_.._........... Front (15t f/r): 15'-0" ; No Change 15 -0" or block average �2nd f�r�: NA ; 36'-2" 20'-0" or block average _........._._...--- ..............._..........._....__....._..--------.. __._........_.......__._.._....._.................._.......__..._....._........_............_.._.........�............_..._..................._......_.........._.................................._.............................._.._..._.....�......................._.........._..._......._.........................------.._..........._.._.._..__.....__...._ Side (left): 4'-0" i No change � 4-0" (right): 4'-0" j No change 4-0" Rear (15t flr):_ .. .... ................._..---- 28'-6'� ......._..... ... _ .. ...1.._........__.............._No...Chang.e..__...... ............. _ . _._ _ 1_5._0.., ----- �2nd fIY�: NA ! 42'-5" ; 20'-0„ _._............_..._.. ......_ ............._........_................................_.........._........_......................................r....................................................................................................._......................................,....._........................._....._......._................_..._..._.._..................................._................... Lot Coverage: 2,544 SF' 2,539 SF2 2,200 SF 46.2% 46.1 % 40% _..._ .............._.._......-----............................-- ----........__._..._.....__._...._. _._ ...............................__............�........................._...................................__.......................... _. __. ; ... ....... ...................._.._.....,...................................._.._._......_......................_........._.......3..................................._. . FAR: � ' 1,917 SF ; 2,726 SF ; 2,860 SF 0.34 FAR ! 0.49 FAR ' 0.52 FAR . , Design Review 1613 Coronado Way 1613 Coronado Way Lot Size: 5,500 SF Plans date stam ed: November 14, 2018 EXISTING ; PROPOSED i ALLOWED/REQ'D # of bedrooms: 3 ; 4 � --- __............ _..__.......---- --------....__ ..............._... ..... _ .............. ........_............._.............._._......._..........__.._.. ._ _ . ..._ . . _. � _ ..... .. ........_............._.................._.............................__ ... . ......._._........... ... .................................._.._...._._.._ __ ._.. _ . ..........._._...._............. 1 covered � i 1 covered Ofif-Streei Parking: (10'-10" x 34'-8") � No change � (10' x 20') 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered , ; , —...._ ._..__.._.__.._.._..........__......._....._......---._......_ __._..._.�9' _x 20'�_..--------.._ ........:....... . ! 9' x 20' _ ......................................_.........._.............__...._...._.._....._.;.._..........._.._.._._._..__....._._..._.__...--- -----...._.....__.._.....__. Building Height: 15'-3" � 29'-2" � 30'-0" ---..........__......._._._............_...---- ---........_ ......................................................_..........................._......_._..__...__...._..........................:................_..__....................................................._........_....._......_......__........_._._..._�.._....._..._.........._...._....._._.._..-----....----......._........................._..._....._. DH Envelope: complies complies � CS 25.26.075 i ' Existing non-conforming lot coverage. 2 Variance not required since there is no increase in lot coverage. 3(0.32 x 5,500 SF) + 1100 SF = 2,860 SF (0.52 FAR) Staff Comments: None Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Sonal Aggarwal Contract Planner c. Jerry Deal, applicant and designer Gregory Button, property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 16, 2018 Area Map 2 " . 4 ! �v_. �i.. ;r� .,'� �f,'L:,�: :' i COMMUNIN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN7 • 601 PRIMRose Ro,4n • BURLIN(3AME, CA 94010 I p: 650.658.7260 • f: 65D.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: 1& Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 025-203-130 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: i� �� PROJECT ADDRESS: 1613 CORONADO WAY C7 Please indicate the contact person for this projed APPUCANT project conmct person 1�1 OK to send elecVonic copiea of dxuments �1 Name: J DEAL ASSOCIATES Address: 337 BEACH ROAD, SUITE A City/State2ip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 Phone: (650) 697 -1370 Fax: E-mail: office@jdealassociates.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person I� OK to send electronic copies of documenta � Name: J DEAL ASSOCIATES PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documenbs � Name: GREGORY BUTTON Address: 1613 CORONADO WAY CitylState/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 (650) 703-2387 Phone: Fa�c: E-mail: Address: 337 BEACH ROAD, SUITE A City/State2ip: BURLINGAME, CA, 94010 650 697 -1370 � � � �N � ;" � � _� ��s� Phone: � ) """' h� .� Fax: �� < ,.._. . E-mail: O ice jdealassociates.com --� � i L%t- _J�„/I-�� \�`^;��,1� -_- .-.'��`"�'�DI�� * Burlingame Business Lioense #: 05755 PROJECT �ESCR►PT�Otv: First floor remodel & second floor addition AFFADAVfT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penaity of perjury that the information given h best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: �� -1, C.7 Date: �/ I am aware of the proposed application ereby authorize the above applicant to submit this Commission. Property owner's signature: °r �'�'��- Date: C n is t e and correct to the � jcat n to the Planning Date submltted: Z � � °_L_ � � * Veriticatlon that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame buslness Ucense will be requlred by the Fnance DepartmeM at the time appllcation fees are pald. ❑ Please marfc one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project S:�Handouts�PC Application 2008-B.handout . CITY OF BURLINGAME r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD `��, BURUNGAME, CA 94010 : �aa , -- PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1613 CORONADO WAY ihe City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall (ouncil (hambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a new second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1613 CORONADO WAY zoned R-1. APN 025-203-130 Mailed: November 16, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin ame A copy of the application and plans for this project ri�ay be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s),in court,.you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the nofice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director ; PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to ofher side) � (� � M O � C � N O ,_ � 0 'C N U�� M .. Z �oa � M Q � ~U ,}: �7� . . `J' (i�� . �� -S �% �'Q � � QD �J� a. �`��'Q � �'Q � �ya �� Q lS�� ;�� aa . c��, �d �.a �3 �� [( �'Lt �Q �� a ��- C. , '�- �, �a �°a � � -c.�� y. .��Q r�� aq Q a �� G4a . o nQ� � a F7J�� nt`� Q �� '� � d a�� '�'Q /`F '� .,a�a ��`�� z �''Q� � � : 'a r,��G �� . �Q d �� a ��r : Q�� ' p�`Q _ § `�lC � , � °�;�� '�' � ,Q .� ��te `�t�n U �c" Qd �� G'� �d �,� �O ��. Q �J' i7 aQ _- � � rq� GC�, u� � �� p� � _ Qp �� d,__ . ., e:-.` -z.-� W �U _ �a v� ��: �° -�� . 7��j q��c ��o� �� Ca4� � 51�''�� ba q� � -.� � �� -F� r� �.' ��7 � � � �.�,,� Q� �� ' Q q �b,. � �� ` " �, `'° � � °� � l �r� �, �a �'�'a�z. ¢� �°��' � �� Q�� , . d . .;� �p/� UD j \` . ��Jd�� . I '''� JVCG'[t �Q I�L3� 3 `?Q�nQ '.�� !3 i�3 �a EO�Q C a 3' E.�'� �s� G' °�' � `��1 L•''G•. a �fi�, ,r•�G p� � �'. a �?� a� ��Q c= , � ��3 Cac? l3 �� ' Cl�'� Q��a �� [ !3 U !3 �� ?" �aEQ ' �� aw�a �'�'� ca,�Q t�e . e � � , � c��a °� J ; �'�va ��,Q ��E� �3�� Y �'�.7Ly ��: � � '~ �!; ��Cs �'tr . C�. Q Q �' � '�C ��,, a = �G . �C. �' Q �Q Fy� �� Ua OQ Q��- ��?� � a a �aQ � ��fia ��'� �e�. ��, �'°� �a �a . a �� e�,,c � � �3� o a Qqp � �� ry� �� p''Q «�., a '� !3 a C�p� F%E}�J r�� U a� �a aa.� . a � p �. Q� �� yd:J �b� ��d � a .. _ � Q ., Q �r.n p�_