The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1422 Capuchino Avenue - Staff Reportr .�. � , •.,.. .,�... A� '•� � `...�k � EY 7�, rti � . p ,.�f�� 2_ � " `�_ pTn 't�` >Z � > y; �yp. .V . ' i,��,�'. r' �, i � 1. v �"F *r{ � �,' i. ,._ 6 !"` � '�._ z�+"y'��-r ''4 ' `� � � i Z ; """i, u. �-' y,�4•�� 'y.��i�t=' y � �� v �L.s a � '� n'. . � ,.: '�/1.. � .; �:k S�A,ti�ia�yj �y �j ��~�� . . H.� �i, , � Y� '��. l �s. . 2 �.t: _ '7!r � , ` .. �j �'-�/� �C � '-+„�``` -"i �ti, � �1� ; � :=��r .,::r � :"�' .. i. s �',1,��'� �`Y.r.; �t, y ' .� A�S '�►,.t6�.4` `r %` �" + • I�a� ''' S�, � � * ',i � j �j�f '!; � _ . . '�. k ,. � ., _,, . �„-+�.�'}� _�4. ,.' ' . . � .�' , . ,' c i"). .- ly� �tiffeti,r� -,w , � � v�, 11 �•. i � t . i ' e ��y � j�..; i 'I.-_ .�.i: �.! i�� , � ,j f,. " �' f'� �".�.i � ! _ �� .•. � � . ��1 Y�� f� �t .. � . . . �! F � '� � 1 I t.._.!� j` I1 � ! � � � I � � 1. .�. ' , ! �,,, S�a � . . . I � 1 �' f , �—! � (,�.�1 f � I �.� . � . � _ � _ f ��,,. . � ` �'� � . ' . .: , { . - ..�.{ . .� � �! p .' '.'� ti,. �'y�.l��.r . - .. , � y,' i �� . �i%� #' , ` ., 1' i . ht p . . � . -. " .. � r . � . �- �.. . ....�'Y'Y.Y�-�'9:.� i� K1�,'�.P. r �': ;. .-�" '_ �.. - 1 . ' . . „'v� �i' . _ t , -, r. . . - ` a-. . ` . , . `<: j�y, � �,.�,L� �._ . , :_..t.,.. ,+ -. {.. O..T fh r � .-.._ �� #Ara�_�.` -.<<�"".r.- -�y` _ . . . `$'�:. y .._� _ 't_�.�...r+.�.- ___ ' _'. _ � x',1:�. "1'.- -. _ ._. . --'��F'.•."��s, . ,. � City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1422 Capuchino Avenue Item No. 9b Design Review Study Meeting Date: September 24, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for a major renovation for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and a new detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Robert Wehneyer, RC Wehmeyer Property Owners: Kamal and Pritee Thakarsey General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-074-210 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single family dwelling and detached garage contains 1,285 SF (0.21 FAR) of floor area. The proposed project includes retaining the right side wall of the house, reconstructing and adding on to the rear of the first floor and constructing a new 1,356 SF second floor. The existing detached garage would be replaced with a new single car detached garage. The total floor area would be 3,349 SF (0.55 FAR) where 3,356 SF (0.56 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The existing house contains 3 bedrooms and with this application would increase to 4 bedrooms, which requires two off-street parking spaces, one of which must be covered. Staff notes that the office at the front of the first floor is more than 50% open to the foyer and therefore is not counted as a bedroom, and the meditation room has a dimension less than 7 feet and therefore is also not counted as bedroom. The new detached garage would provide a 10' wide by 20' deep clear interior space and one uncovered parking space is provided in the driveway (9' x 20'). All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and a new detached garage (CS 25.57.010). 9422 Capuchino Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 11, 2018 EXISTING PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQUIRED � _.. ._.... _ SETBACKS �_.. ...... _. ._ .. _._ Front (9st flr): 14'-10" ; 17'-7" ' block average 17'-7" (2nd flr): N/A j 23'-1" 20'-0" or block average _... _ _ ...._...... _ _......._ _ __._._ _. _.. __ ..._.. __ __ . , _._. Side (left): 12'-1 " 10'-7" 4'-0" (right): 4'-11" 4'-11" 4'-0" _.._ _ . _(. ) _._........ .. , ... __. _.. ......... Rear 1st flr . 54'-7" 43'-1" 15'-0" (2nd flr): N/A 44'-7" 20'-0" _..... ' _.... '...... _. Lot Coverage: 1,802 SF 2,120 SF 2 400 SF 30% � 35.3% 40% _ ---...._._ _........_ ......................_.__......................_......._........................_ ..........._.._...__................._..............._,......_..........._ _........._.._......_...... ._........_......_,........................_........................_............................... ,............................................ _.. ...................... FAR: 1,285 SF 3,349 SF 3,356 SF 0.21 FAR 0.55 FAR 0.56 FAR __._ __..... _ _...... _._._. _. _ ..__ _. .__.... _...._. .. # of bedrooms: 3 4 --- _...__ ..............._............................_..............................................................................................................................._................._..;._.............._........_._................................_...........__......._..__....._..._......................_:...............__................_......._..........._....._.. _ , , _ _. _ ..................... Off-Sfreef Parking: 1 covered ' 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') (10' x 20') + 1 uncovered � + 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _..._... _.. _ �9' x._2��) ....._. �9'._X 20�).... Design Review 1422 Capuchino Avenue EXISTING PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQUIRED Height: 15'-1 " 29'-9" 30'-0" DH Envelope: N/A Complies CS 25.28.075(b)(2) �v.�c � v,vvv �r� T �, �uu �r T 3,�0 = 3,3�+y JI- �U.55 rHK) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Parks and Stormwater Divisions. Staff notes that the project includes the retention of the existing oak tree along the left side property line. The project has been designed to provide a 10'-2" clearance for vehicles into the detached garage. The City Arborist is has requested a tree protection plan for the oak tree, which has been provided and is attached. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Catherine Keylon Senior Planner c. RC Wehmeyer Design, applicant and designer Kamal and Pritee Thakarsey, property owners Attachments: ■ Application to the Planning Commission ■ Arborist Report & Tree Protection Plan ■ Staff Comments ■ Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 14, 2018 ■ Area Map � ��'�� cirrwuH�scN+r. �� COb1MUNITY DEVEl,OPMENT DEPARTM�Ni • 541 Prtt�ttose Roa4 •$URC,(NGqME, CA 94QiQ p: 654.558.7250 • f: 650.S9fi.3794 • www.burtingamQ.org AP��cAs�a�v �-a -r�� n�� qnnr��s��or� Ty�e of application: C� Design Review O Variance ❑ Parce( #: �� "��'�t - Z4p ❑ Condi2lonal Use Permit ❑ Specia! Permit ❑ Zoning ! Other: PRO,lECT ADDRESS: ��i2� CA�PUC�111�1p APPLICAN7 'Vame: Robert Wehmever �ddr�ss: 12D4 BurlinQame Ave Suite No 7 City/State/Zip: 3uriinqame, CA 9�010 �hnne: (6S0) 340-1055 �-n�atil; rob�a.rcwehmev�r.com ARCHITECTIDESIGNER Name: Robert Wehmgyer! WehmeygE esign �,ddress� 1204 Burlinqame Ave Suite No 7 Giry/State/Zip: Buriinqame. CA 9401 Q Phone: f&50) 340-1055 E-mail: rob c�rcwehmever.corn Burlingame Business License #: 29217 RRUPERTY OWNER Name: �3MA�� ar�n �iL!'tt� T►ir��c,aQSrEY Address: IAZZ. �iPuc�-iw� 4 Cit�f!S1�3t8iZl�': _�1�iNC��•.L� , C,A - q 4 01 � Phone: (4c8� � ►b - l�z.,E, a F-rnail: 1�ar�,ol�,alF.a�sty� a�t ca�+ � ,+i�-�* ' '�� ,, � � �.-�..� � ry �y, , � '' y �' ? :� «:s P;;�,,. :- � c� r � i 8 ,-;�� ,� +� GIYi� 1... [:�J;-;_j�`s.:."-,`! _ ,,n - __ �" . .. ..`l. �_: u-�= . , � �luthorization to ReDroduce Proiect Plans: 4 hereby grant ihe City oi Burlingame the authvrity to reproduce upon request andlor post plaps submitted with this application en trie City's wehsite as part of the planning approva! process and waive any clatr�s against the Cify arising aut of or related to such action. (Initials af Archi#ectlDesignerj 6�ROJECT DESCRtPTiON: �NT�"hZl�� i�G��Gi�E'�� 'f`JC'% r�PA�7�{� 7� �({�,� �" ¢— `� �-c. €��'Q 'Qt.�v � � a F t �� s t � C�, � ,� .S Tc� R. � �. �s"�.�� r" �---� _�� :� �.--c°�zc^��-i� C� t�-�'L�°t-f n t,,. AFFiDAViTlSlGNATURE: ! hereby certify under penaity o` perjury that fhe informatton gi�eR h�reiri �s ttue ar,d correct ta th2 ��st oi my kno�vlad�e and t�efi ,. Appficar�Ys signature: C� �� 4� Data: _ r� �:/.-- �,�� ° h� r-- I am aware o� the proposed appfication and nereby uthonz� i`�e �bave applicant to su�mii this appl��t�on to the Plannin� Commiss:on. � _ - - • ; �.<=,w_� - f - _ ,, _ _ -; � Property owner's signature: 'i� .-,=�F �"""-`._�_--"' " Date: � ' '' _� .,;- . ' - - - Date submitfed: S,,NA�v4c;r�; 5�P[.av�t;,or�cn..�oc � GITY O �� `,�.�� o'� �'_,� o , m 9Pea� Project Address: Description From Project Comments — Planning Application 1422 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-074-210 Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Required Best Management Practices (BMPs) apply to all construction projects utilizing architectural copper. P/ease read "Requirements for Architectural Copper." A downloadable electronic file is available at: http�//www flowstobav orq/files/newdevelopment/flversfactsheets/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs.pdf The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger) plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay.orq/Construction under Construction BMP Brochures: Construction BMP Plan Sheet. For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolyn.critz(a�veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: April 19, 2018 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 ��, ciTv � ��;�� t,� _: �. -:-:., � 1� � ��.._ :__,��a� a aco�' � �o apo Project Comments — Planning Application Project Address: 1422 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-074-210 Description From: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing singie-family dwelling. Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Private Protected Tree Removal Permit required for removal of Oak Tree along driveway. (attached). Submit an arborist reports detailing the trees health and structure and why removal is necessary. The following comments.do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Existing landscape fo remain; 3 existing trees and 2 new trees proposed Reviewed By: BD Date: 4.16.18 bdisco@burlingame.org Kielty Arborist Services LLC Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-515-9783 June 19, 2018, Revised September 5, 2018 RC Weymeyer design and Build Attn: Ms. Katrina Hall Reweymeyer.com Site: 1422 Capuchino, Burlingame, CA Dear Ms. Hall, As requested on Friday, June 15, 2018, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on the trees. A new home is proposed for this site and your concern for the future health and safety of the trees has prompted this visit. Method: % All inspections were made from the ground; the trees were not climbed for this inspection. The trees in question were located on a map provided by you. The trees were then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). The trees were given a condition rating for form and vitality. The trees condition rating is based on 50 percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the trees was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced of£ Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 Survey: Tree# Species 1 P Pin oak (Qa�ercus pala�stris) �� DBH CON HT/SP Comments 4.1 90 20/10 Good vigor, good form, young tree, street tree. 2*P Coast live oak 30est 80 (Quercus agrifolia) 3R Cherry brush hedge 11.8 30 (Syzygium airstrale) 40/35 Good vigor, fair form, well maintained, close to neighbor's driveway, overly thinned out. 6 times diameter-15 feet 15/10 Poor vigor, poor form, nearly dead, heavily topped, in decline. 4R Lemon 8.1 10 15/10 NEARLY DEAD. (Citrus spp.) 5P Coast live oak 29.8 45 (Quercus agrifolia) Shared tree on property line 6R Cherry plum 10-10-8-6-5 45 (Pritnus spp.) 7R Apple (Mczlus spp.) 11.2 35 8R Pear �PyYL�S Spp.) 8.2 45 9R Black acacia 2"x6 40 (Acacia melanoxylon) 40/35 Good vigor, poor form, multi leader at 6 feet, shared tree on property line, tree has been hedge pruned on both the property side and neighbor's property side, adjacent to existing and proposed driveway. 30/20 Fair vigor, poor form, multi leader at base with decay at base, most of tree a stump re- sprout. 20/20 Poor vigor, poor form, heavily decayed trunk. 15/12 Fair vigor, poor form, not well maintained. 20/10 Fair vigor, poor form, multi leader at base, invasive species. P-Indicates protected tree by city ordinance R-Indicates proposed tree removal *-Indicates tree on neighboring properry 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 (3) Summary: The trees on site are a mix of imported and native trees. Pin oak tree #1 is a street tree that has been recently planted. This tree is in excellent condition. Street trees are required to be protected regardless of size in the city of Burlingame. The entire street tree planting pit is recommended to be fenced of£ This will help to retain the existing soil structure and protect the soil from compaction within the tree's root zone as well as future root zone. Coast live oak tree #2 is located on the neighboring property to the east, only a few feet from the property line. The existing home on site is within the tree's calculated root zone of 6 times the tree's diameter. The existing home foundation likely acted as a root barrier for this tree. Roots underneath the homes foundation are expected to be nonexistent to minimal. Cherry brush #3 consist of 4 trees. The recorded diameter is the largest diameter measured out of the 4 trees. These trees are all in poor condition due to being topped in the past as well as growing in the suppressed conditions caused by the neighboring oak tree. These trees do offer some minor screening for the property. Because these trees are in poor condition they are recommended for removal. These trees are not of a protected size in Burlingame. To replace the lost screen it is recommended to replant with a native species with the same water requirements as the oak tree. The Pacific Wax Myrtle (Morella californica) would be a good replacement species in this location. Lemon tree #4 is nearly dead and should be removed. No mitigation measures would be expected to improve the trees health. This tree is not a protected tree in Burlingame. Coast live oak tree #5 is located at the property line to the west. The majority of the tree is on the property, but a portion of the tree's trunk is on the neighboring property making it a shared tree. This tree has been poorly maintained in the past by both the neighbor and the previous property owner. The tree has been hedge pruned on both sides for building clearance. Pruning cuts consist of heading cuts on all of the limbs, resulting in an abundance of sprout like growth. The pruning has also created an unbalanced canopy. The tree has caused significant property damage to the existing driveway on site. The driveway is proposed to be replaced in the same location. Future pruning shall consist of hedge pruning on both sides of the tree as taken place in the past. The top of the tree is recommended to be reduced as well. Cherry plum tree #6 is in poor condition. The tree is a stump re-sprout meaning the tree was removed in the past but no poisoned so the tree grew new trunks from the base of the tree. The tree has a good amount of fruit production. This tree is recommended to be removed due to substantial decay near grade. (4) Apple tree #6 is in decline and recommended for removal. Heavy decay was observed on the tree's trunk making the tree hazardous. This tree is not a protected sized tree. Showing heavy decay on apple tree #6 Pear tree #8 is in poor condition. This tree is not of a protected size and no permit is required to remove the tree. Removal is recommended. Black acacia tree #9 is in poor condition. This tree is codominant at grade with 6 separate leaders. This species is extremely invasive and encouraged for removal in most cities. Removal is recommended. This tree is under the protected size in Burlingame. The following tree protection plan will help to reduce potential impacts to the retained trees on site. Potential impacts to the retained trees from the proposed construction/mitigation measures: The proposed first floor foundation near the neighbor's coast live oak tree #2 will be slightly further away from the tree than the existing foundation. The existing foundation will need to be carefully removed when working near this tree. Tree protection fencing is recommended to be placed at a radius of 15 feet (6 times diameter) from this tree where possible throughout all stages of construction including demolition. Fencing will need to be placed at the existing home foundation and out to 15 feet from the tree where possible. Demolition equipment must work as far from the tree as possible to reduce the risk of compaction to the tree's root zone. Fencing at 15 feet from the tree will stop demolition equipment from being located within the tree's critical root zone. The project arborist is recommended to be called out to the site to witness the removal of the foundation near this tree, so that mitigation measures can be recommended if roots are impacted(not likely). The proposed foundation near this tree is recommended to be excavated by hand. If roots are encountered they must first be shown to the Project Arborist before being cut. All roots to be cut must be cut cleanly using a hand saw or loppers. A soaker hose will need to be placed at the proposed foundation edge if root loss takes place. The soaker hose shall remain in place during the first dry season following root cutting. The hose should be turned on until the top foot of soil is saturated once a month. 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 (5) A new concrete paver driveway is proposed in the same location as the existing driveway near oak tree #5. Special construction measures must be taken to reduce impacts to the tree. Driveway demolition and construction is recommended to take place at the end of the project as the existing driveway is acting as protection to the root zone. The roots in this area are used to growing in compacted conditions caused by cars driving on the driveway. If the driveway is retained until the end of the project, tree protection fencing can consist of orange plastic fencing wrapped around the tree to form a 2 inch thick layer. The orange plastic fencing must continue until the first lateral limb is reached. 2 inch thick wooden slats shall then be bound to the outside of the orange plastic fencing. This will protect the trunk of the tree as roots are being protected by the existing driveway. Showing oak tree #� next to existing driveway At the end of the project when it is time to start the driveway work near oak tree #5, the Project Arborist shall be called out to the site before the work is to take place to meet with the contractor who is doing the work, so the contractor fully understands the method needed to do the work with the least amount of impact to the tree. The existing driveway material must be carefully removed by hand using a jackhammer to break the material into small hand manageable sized pieces when working within 20 feet from this tree. All needed excavation for the new driveway must also be done by hand. All encountered roots must be retained when within 20 feet from this tree. Structural soil (CU Mix) is recommended to be used as a base rock material underneath the proposed driveway. This material looks just like normal aggregate used for driveway construction but has been specifically designed (by Cornell University) to allow roots to grow under the required compacted conditions that driveway construction will need. All encountered roots must be exposed and remain damage free. If roots are to be left exposed for longer than one day they must be wrapped in burlap and kept moist by spraying down the burlap multiple times a day. Structural Soil (CU Mix) shall then be packed around all of the existing roots that have grown into the driveway area until all roots have been covered. Then after compaction of the Structural Soil mix the paver driveway can then be built on top of the material. Structural Soil can be purchased at TMT Enterprises out of San Jose, California. If the above recommendations are carried out, impacts to the tree are expected to be minor. This tree will need to be monitored every 6 months for a year following construction. Heavy irrigation will be needed following the construction of the driveway. The area should be flooded every 2 weeks for 6 months following the construction of the drive�vay. The proposed first floor foundation when within 20 feet from this tree will need to be excavated by hand with the Project Arborist on site to document. Rooting in this area is expected to be minimal as the existing home foundation likely acted as a root barrier for the tree. All roots in the proposed foundation area must first be shown to the Project Arborist before being cut. Impacts to the tree are expected to be minor. 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 (6) Tree Protection Plan: Tree Protection Zones Tree protection zones should be installed and maintained throughout the entire length of the project. Prior to the commencement of any Development Project, a chain link fence shall be installed at a distance of 6 times the diameter of any protected tree which will or will not be affected by the construction. Fencing for the protection zones should be 6 foot tall metal chain link type supported my 2 inch metal poles pounded into the ground by no less than 2 feet. The support poles should be spaced no more than 10 feet apart on center. Signs should be placed on fencing signifying "Tree Protection Zone - Keep Out". No materials or equipment should be stored or cleaned inside the tree protection zones. Excavation, grading, soil deposits, drainage and leveling is prohibited within the tree protection zones. No wires, signs or ropes shall be attached to the protected trees on site. Utility services and irrigation lines shall all be place outside of the tree protection zones if possible. Tree protection fencing is recommended to be installed at a distance of 6 times the diameter of the protected trees to be retained. The retained street tree #1 will need to have its planting pit completely fenced off. Fencing distances from trees to be retained Pin oak tree #1- Fencing shall be installed in a way that completely fences off the entire street tree planting pit. Coast live oak tree #2- Fencing shall be installed at a distance of 15 feet(6 times diameter) from the tree. Where not possible because of the existing foundation, fencing shall be placed at the foundation edge. Coast live oak tree #5- Tree protection fencing will consist of orange plastic fencing wrapped around the tree to form a 2 inch thick layer. The orange plastic fencing must continue until the first lateral limb is reached. 2 inch thick wooden slats shall then be bound to the outside of the orange plastic fencing. The existing driveway near this tree will need to be retained until the end of the construction. Inspections The site arborist will need to verify that tree protection fencing has been installed before the start of construction. The city of Burlingame usually requires a letter stating the fencing is in place before any permits are to be granted. The site arborist must inspect the site anytime excavation work is to take place within 6 times the diameter of a protected tree on site. It is the contractors responsibility to contact the site arborist if excavation work is to take place within 6 times the diameter of the protected trees on site. Kielty Arborist Services can be reached at kkarbor0476@yahoo.com or by phone at (650) 515-9783 (Kevin), or (650) 532-4418 (David). 1422 Capuchino 9/5/18 (7) Root Cz�tting and Grading No roots are expected to be cut on this site. If for any reason roots are to be cut, they shall be monitored and documented. Large roots (over 2" diameter) or large masses of roots to be cut must be inspected by the site arborist. The site arborist, at this time, may recommend irrigation or fertilization of the root zone. All roots needing to be cut should be cut clean with a saw or lopper. Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered with layers of burlap and kept moist. The site arborist must first give consent if roots over 2 inches in diameter are to be cut. Landscape Barrier zone If for any reason a smaller tree protection zone is needed for access, a landscape buffer consisting of wood chips spread to a depth of six inches with plywood or steel plates placed on top will be placed where tree protection fencing is required. The landscape buffer will help to reduce compaction to the unprotected root zone. Trenching and Excavation Trenching for irrigation, drainage, electrical or any other reason shall be done by hand when inside the dripline of a protected tree. Hand digging and the careful placement of pipes below or besides protected roots will significantly reduce root loss, thus reducing trauma to the tree. All trenches shall be backfilled with native materials and compacted to near its original , level, as soon as possible. Trenches to be left open for a period of time, will require the covering of all exposed roots with burlap and be kept moist. The trenches will also need to be covered with plywood to help protect the exposed roots. Irrigation Normal irrigation for the imported species to be retained (#1 and #6) should be maintained throughout the entire length of the project. The imported trees on this site will require irrigation during the warm season months. Some irrigation may be required during the winter months depending on the seasonal rainfall. During the summer months the trees on this site should receive heavy flood type irrigation 2 times a month. During the fall and winter 1 time a month should suffice. Mulching the root zone of protected trees will help the soil retain moisture, thus reducing water consumption. The trees are recommended to be irrigated by means of a soaker hose during the dry summer months. The soaker hose should be turned on once a month for 4 hours at a time. The coast live oak trees shall not be irrigated unless their root zones are traumatized. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty David P. Beckham Certified Arborist WE#0476A Certified Arborist WE#10724A i �, ' } �i � �� ; ;' i � � f` � � Q 6 ! � �I (�. tr° ��' � @A � � � � Q 33v S a•;( �r , y �' I Y }C �'� ti ��.7� �.+ ��t�� .. � t � ��s ��d?�x � � ��S�f� �� 3. � � ! �. ill ,. I� �� i � '� �1� ;�' �' ;� �; i!; � � ; Ij i I I%' ; `�`� � ' i � ; � �, � �irk.�� C9g i yx y�i F4. ,NO �4� Si u�� 0 Q I - i I I I � i I ;� I I I i � � � i � ; ' I _ , _ . i I I I. I � � i .. . . . . � , . ... I .. i r. ' '�� I. I � : � �y I � i; : i � � '� �� ' ' � " ?, v;' i , ! ' � � ,4 !g , � � I I I � � � I I � ��' e I � x '� � �u � i �n, ' ' i XI, xI ..v.:. �t � r 4y � : _r I � � '� � £ �g I } .L � � - 7 S i�� n� � �:��3 i, � I �tl W�' � :+'�16 . 41 ! I � I i� F �3 �j � }.1 y ��ye`(� �� ., I �! t,� I ��Y �f EF f ti i, ^2 4 d ', I 1 I �ey .� i � �.. tl �' � ,�1� �i: e'] I I�� ;' � � � �� I' I I p4 I�� fi �� i;: �� I ,�� . I i � �� i � � �� a� , @� # i a r�, F� �1� �Sei i ��I i I � �� 6 ! �� ' i �' �'' ' i � W 1 i � � !I I � I � _� , ! i i I � i , �� I , ` ,� � � � '(y. ` �i I ti, � . � T - - i �-��' I ��i. --- .�{ - .. I . 1 i/ i � �� i i I ' I I ' _ t- '� r"�' �' `- r •',Q .�.,...w n: w..: . _ � ; I _ i, 't ' ' : I ...� Ij ,i ' I ' ..... ._! . .:' � _.�JF ( , i � .a i �� I �! � Ii (, i�g ; � • ,� i � , � � .�° i I � �I Y I I �2 ' ".�� .��' 'i I �,� I .I ;� w 4 i � j� , I s� 1 0� �. : � � _ . . . � ' 1 � � i �' i (��' y � I i s.� �& .� � � ( � � tl > "I ..,� � i" . - i :•, i � 't �� ;4R o i N'„ i i 1 � '� �, z �I i i .., 1 � f' � � � 'J I" �; � �� , , i� ; � � � .� �� ..,.. n„ .. r. I r � � i I � V �' i � i,, �� ,;1, ' l�l(.fi (� � i,j. _,_ .. _ �J;a �� , lia ; , , ; ' I i- �' '- � i ' � ; _ _ _ __ __. , ; ., ,�.��„ , � I �„ t�` ; � 4 �� I� J , , � , �� ' � .,: t � . ' _ � _ . . , .. . , . i � 1 ,� , . I:� � . _ , : ' '' , ' I � ,� I .. 4 M.u� n 1� '�`y � a-c.is-t�a..-�c r _ --,s�.a�.�x-- L-.�r= �=x.�.r�.-=�u-�-s n. � i . , i I i � .' '� ' i A y y � � �� '. � .. , �� :� / .. c`S 'f �'C ^ �; I ! � i i I _�_ �j r• Y e� �:� � �� y � � � �� — y� L_I ! � �^ �' �(�I W � I F i I�� I. � I . +�� I � y� T� .,� n � I X� I'� N� ICt I �� q I I@y � � � fr •: �� .�.' J �i� �� . i,;F I I� 3X k �' � s I rigq I I �' � � � S!,-�`, �' 3� ;i� f �" v4 s'g - i � � , �y" I i k�a � ' Ei' "{( "} .�!'i I � I . y� 7?N II �: ' � Hi�� v y ..� I � I r�'� � ,� I i � I I i .,�r I i i � I, I �f. . i i � kl � i i I i �. � i ��i � i i j I ; � � I ; I �' �� t" � �.;�� i i i ; I ; li i i �i I +I i � � ; ; , i', ; il i ;� i I � i i, I �I n i �� e �k�:� � M1 j �.�: t � I i a �? F. ? � � ' e . � � � � � a' � � :; � � G s 'S �„, .� ? � )1 T ; � r �� i �1 ^ w :� � 3 J � � $ # � � 1 I �L��.'�1'^��!IL.LJ ?��'"�'�• ! f � � � � I I � � i _..� .� CITY OF BURLINGAME � "� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ; �'a � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �.�� :_ ,, _ . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1422 CAPUCHINO AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a major renovation (new constructian) for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling at 1422 CAPUCHINO AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-014-210 Mailed: September 14, 2018 (P/ease refe� to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOYICE Citv of Burlin ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the pubiic hearing. Property owners �vho receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PLlB�IC HEARIP+IG N(3TICE (Please refer tu othar srde) 1422 Capuchino Avenue 300' Radius APN 026.074.210 � �� a v�,�� 9� U�� , a aF do q�a pG �r7� . Q �� D fi' _ .. [ c:.p �'�L� p� q� o°� �Uo� �?�, + . .. �p }�� " ,�� G� aa� � 'r., ,)h1 a��'% D�D� . �� Q�' '� �'fld ��9�. qy+ ' _�y � 7 rs. �u (� DOU ty?. o � o �% ��a'"��`°' QpQ q� ��OO ' D _ � ga ' _ . �u� q�p ��. . 4a D�� £ ,' e � �� . . ��da�p �,, �'o � � "� � ,�' . a A�p �� D� [�' u q`� p v's 17q, - a g ti a4C' �q `'�'��t p O� ' � ° , O �� ' �`� �' ^ �t� a ''� o '� p,� .,(,� c� "� � ' " A/ � n ,��% �� '�z�,� 4 � �s � � ` '�.., � p� Ci� � (�p �`�rx p � 4� � � ff�� R O r� wvp. a at9 � q�� Q q�q q �y� .. Faev 4� `v� 'a _y�- � � � u . _yy q : . 1T L�y- �� p� Q W� "G�y � Qp � ; 4 q q Q r� Q��' Ayr a QQ A� � �� 1� �ci:, " '�`r� e�'' � p �� '� 4l p �V 1�7 .'+� �'�J ty� .Q a�:� .,a a �. : � [a� �O�`" � "� . Q� G`,yq G �� Aa �� " q�aq q� ' �;, � � _ Bs w n �aC�� n, ad o�' ;�t,4 c' ��' O �� q �� Q;a p� �pJ a. � � �� q �.. � � � � U � �� p� q�qp� G " Q� �� a pc� o� ';� � D �'' �c iQ� q� q� qd qp0 A qv" �q ,�'4� p p�7 �� uU �d �47 q� � �� 4 � �� v� Q4� 4�� o a ��' ,�,`� _ `' �,� _p� �a a°° „ p Qq�' ,� Q�9 �a � \ �' �o° . "� � �a �; V _ . � �� ' . . a "> � �� ' ` y � , � yFy.. � ., [J ., 4 . L � � ��pq��Jh� �� $` �� ` .._ J n ' J�l�� Q� � v � ' � �J D 3" F��9 �0r� � � �. , y .. r9 , DpDDE � ��p � �� , q ��, � � w qq� � Q , U�D ��? �^ 40 . Fj �c�3 ,,f �p'h (l� �ct3� q D �7D�� , a ��'r� a° ��, �� o �"� q �'U �� Q�' �r. , � a p � q �o t7 D`%7 `� q�T� Lj 49 r�va 4 q�J �� C.� q9p q pw G'j^ p D�?�;J a �p qq`� � A� q� FT� � 9: �, � q�' � ��;`� � q`� qb a� Uu D, �C+� 4 Wa c� �9a �J �`� t7 UC � t7 FJ�D �Q Q p Q9� �y^� qb� 4 D� �D�` F� ��fi a �,e� Q q� o „� qq o� a ar� �q a�� q��,,, �� a p° qa � ��,� w Ws� � QQp � �.':t; qck,b �� a�` r!pO a�` D� �J � O 9 3 FT t7 q� �9Cj� � F,� q4�� I � Qc� qyy U�pFJ�'Q ��n 43dW` a b p 4b 4? U. � l? Q� t�� A� �� p DfltJ O D`�i�i'� �� r- W .,�� w9 q� rJ„ � y�� J �,,� ,