HomeMy WebLinkAbout903 California Drive - Environmental Document� -
PROJECT APPLICATION
. -� �r CEQA ASSESSMENT
+� �
� �
� � � Application received ( 5/16/83
-o +� a� Staff review/acceptance (
•r � N �i
`" +-� N ��— 1.
+� t v
�n 4- +� -�
� o
a� � a •
O O +-� N
a� 3 4�
� � ���
+-� i N V
"p rt3 tn •r
� � U � S';
O � i cn ?2.
'(� � •r •r
N > 4J r-
Y•r L N (d
� L -I--� U +.�
r� � r-- �
Q. �C �> QJ
«s L s. s.3.
v •r- rts a�
S-- � O- N -I-�
� i v�
O N � O
v� � N �— E
a� �� a� +�
r— � �, +� �
U rC O � S-.
• r U r � �
t �- N -I-�
> O a1 Q i
.-,
�
.�
Assessor's Office
(5/18/83) shows:
G.!5
Z
Y
�
¢
d
w
F--
H
N
I
Z
0
�
��� C 1 TY Q�
903 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
BURLINGAME project address
� AGENCY RENT A CAR
�*�_r.p'����,°� project name - if any
)
APPLICANT Agency Rent A Car 340-9100
name telephone no.
903 California Drive, Burlingame, CA. 94010 �
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Duncan Downing 340-9100
contact person, if different telephone no.
TYPE OF APPLICATION
(641-7755)
Speci�.l Perr.;ii: (X ) Variance* () Ccndominium Pernit () Oth�r
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION USE DETERMINATION to al l ow a car rental faci 1 i ty
to operate from a site in the C-2 District; the Zoning Ordinance_
does not include car rentals as a permitted use in that district.
The annlicant � A�qency Rent A Car shares the site with a body sho�
and leases a 450 SF second floor office and five of the existing
parking�paces on this site. The office op�rates 8 AM - 5 PM
Monday through Thursday and 8 AP� - 7 PM on Fridays; it is staffed
by three full-time employees and handles a 42 car fleet. Overflow
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) �*�
Ref. code section(s)
4. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
( 026-201-070 �
APN
( C-2 )
zoning district
Richard J. & Hilda
land owner's name
� 25.36.030 � �
� 12&13 � � 11
lot no. block no.
� 10,000
land area, square feet
Faziola
� Easton Addition
subdivision name
532 Huron Avenue s�'
a dres
an �rancisco, CA. 94112
Renuired �ate received city zip code
��s� (no) ( — ) Proof of ownershi�
(yes )(�s) ( MI SSI NG ) Owner's consent to appl ication
r
�
� 5.
•a'-v
� a�
o -v
c • �>
t0 N O
� �
�.. U Q-
o Rs
t Q N
N c� N
U
�rn �
� Q
o v� cn
..Q •r
rn
� � o
��
+� v�
� �
� •r N
Es c
a� +� c�
.'- c a6
� O
a' �
N N C
� � •r
U "�
� •r r
'(7 �F •r
O 4- �
U O �
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
Existing 5,000 SF body shop with a 450 SF upstairs office _
used b,�gencv Rent A Car.
Required
(yes ) �r�
(yes) �no�
(�) (no)
(�e�) (no)
(other)
Date received
( 5/ 16/83 )
m
� - )
( 5/ 16/83 )
Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall<s and
curbs; all str�ctures and improvements;
paved on-site parking; landscaping.
Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of usc�`on each floor plan.
Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
Site cross section( ) (if relevant).
letter of exp�anation
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
PROJECT PP,�POSAL (NO NEW CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED)
Proposed construction, Below orade ( SF) Second floor ( SF)
gross floor area First floor ( SF) Third floor ( SF)
Pro.ject Codp Project Code
Pr000sal Requirement Propos 1 Requirement
Front setback Lot coverage
Side setback 110 Cild f,uilding height 110 2
Side yard Landscaped area
Rear yard On-site pks.spaces 9* 9
���_
.�, , • ,
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
Full tine em�loyees on site
Part tir�e emoloyees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trin ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
EXISTING
after
8-5 5 PM
�
i'• �
�• .
1
i : �1 �_
�1
IPl 5 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach senarate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAhID USES
Body shops to the north; vacuum cleaner repair shop to the
south; Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and commute parkinq across
California Dr.; residences to the east. This use conforms to the
ronoral Plan
Required Date received
(yes) �F�(�) �5�2 aerial )
(yes) �esa) ( )
Location plan of adjacent properties.
Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firr�s ( 1 ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( 5,Q��( SF office space)
( � SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comnany vehicles at this location ( )
IPJ 2 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 () Other application type, fee $2 5. (X )
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 (X)
Variance/oth�r districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25 (/�)
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ (
TOTAL FEES $ 75 . �� RECEI PT N0. 33ng Recei ved by ii . Towber
I herehy certify undex penalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and co.[rect to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature
te_ 5 �� �n' �'�3 � _ _
STAFF USE OPlLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
7he �ity of Burlingame by MARGARET MONROE on May 20 , 1983 ,
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( X ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a con�iUs�on: The proposed Cdl" rental US2 On thl S S1 t@ 1S
a more intense use than others normally permitted on this site but
will not cause a significant adverse effect on traffic, no�se, air
or other environmental concerns in this area.
�I�GORICALLY EXEMPT• CEQA SEC 15100 1)
'�i����n�,/l � �� CITY PLANNER � ►� 3
Sign ure of Processino fficial Title Dai:e Si ed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te posted, the deternination shall be final.
DECLARATION OF POSTIPJG Date Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I oosted a true copy of the above Neqative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to th� Council Chambers.
Executed at [iurlingame, California on
Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )Plo
19
EVELYP� H. HILL, CITY CLERK, CITY OF BURLINGAME
, ., .
Average # of rentals per day- 6.4
(averaged over the most recent
nine week �eriod)
Average # of trips to shop 1.0
Average ,# of add. pick-ups 2.0
9.4X 2 � 18.8
Most rentals in one day
Pick-ups
Trip to shop
11.00
8.0
1.O
20 X 2� 40
INITIAL STUDY:
The Initial Study determined that the project, as proposed, will not cause any of the
following effects:
�.
�
�
�
��
/�'
i'1.
,/S •
9.
��6.
�YT�.
�
�Y3 .
.r4 •
.�5•
�16 .
�•
�•
�9•
�0.
�1 •
�•
,2�3".
�
Conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where
it is located; �
Have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effect;
Substantially affect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or
the habitat of the species;
Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish
or wildlife species;
Breach published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste
or litter control;
Substantially degrade water quality;
Contaminate a public water su�ply;
Substantially degrade or deplete ground water resources;
Interfere substantially with ground water recharge:
Disrupt or alter an archaeological site over 200 years old, an historic
site or a paleontological site except as part of a scientific study of
the site;
Induce substantial growth or concentration of population;
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street system;
Displace a large number of.peonle.
Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel
or energy;
Use fuel or energy in a wasteful manner;
Tncrease substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas;
�ause substantial flooding, erosion or siltation;
Expose people or structures to major geologic hazards;
Extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development;
Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants;
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community;
Create a public health hazard or a potential public health hazard;
Conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific
uses of the area; �
Violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant concentrations.
. � � �,
,.
STAFF REVIEW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATIOfJ
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review hy:
City Engineer
Building Inspector
fire Marshal
Park Department
Ci ty Attorney
date circulated
( 5/19/83 >
( 5/19/83 )
( 5/ 19/83 �
� — )
� — )
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATIOP! MEASURES
Concerns Mitigation Measures
Is this use compatible with Review site; make determination.
other uses in the area?
Will the rental agency have any Review site and application;
negative impacts on adjacent request comments on this
sites? proposa�T at the public hearing.
Will this use meet all Fire and Request comments from the Fire
Building Code requirements? Marshal and Chief Building
Inspector.
Review the traffic impacts and Request comments from the City
circulation impacts of this use Engineer.
Is there sufficient on-street Review present parking
parking on this site for both situation.
3. CEQA REQUIREMEPlTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA review? Cateaorically exem,�t
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study completed
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
RFP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR acce�ted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
�
reply received
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.0
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
4. APPLICATIOPJ STATUS Date first received (5/16/83 )
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to aoplicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study (�. �� 3/ 8? )
Is application ready for a�ublic hearing? (yes (no) Recomm�ended date ,��g�2� 8 3 )
c o.+�r, u�a o>d �
Date staff report mailed to aoplicant ('� � 3 ) Date Corrunission hearing (� ii �)
Application approved ( ) Denied (` ) Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( ) A�olication apnroved ( ) Denied ( )
s i gne d da t���l�
�w� w . .
YeS( X )
Y'r � +�+ � r � � Y�
RENT-A-CAR QUESTIONNAIRE
no( )
TUESDAY THURSDAY
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANMf; :, DEPT.
�����` ='
► . -
Naine o esta ishment Proposed Burlingame address
1. SITE DESCRIPTION (A site plan drawn to scale, showing property lines, all structures
and parking areas, is to accompany this questionnaire.)
Land area
Gross floor area, all structures
Landscaping
Area leased by agency:
� 10,000 SF)
� 5450 SF)
� o SF)
office area
vehicle storage within building
vehicle storage outside, on-site
off-site parking in regular use
� 45o SF)
( n )# vehicles
( 5 )# vehicles
C'al i frnia nr. �c�nth t�f nff.
Address
Rurlinqame
C i ty
Where are company vehicles parked when
there 1 S an overfl ow from th2 above areas?��,e nnt har-1 p.>>orf jnYu
Address, City
Are there other tenants or
businesses on this property?
2. COMPANY VEHICLES
Company vehicles to be kept in Burlingame:
average # rental vehicles, on-site
peak # rental vehicles, or-site
# shuttle vehicles (if any) podqe Colt
average # rental vehicles stored off-site
Where are vehicles: washed
oil changed
minor servicing
� �i 7L��! �-�. �
M A Y 1 G 1983
SATURDAY
Arco Station Broadway& Rollins Rurtinqame
Address, City
� ■� �,� .. .. ��-
Same
Are any of the above services occasionally performed on-site? yes( ) no( X�)
..' - - � ..
Rent-A-Car Questionnaire
Page 2
3. COMPANY EMPLOYEES & HOURS OF BUSINESS
Company employees to be based in Burlingame:
full time 8 AM - 5 PM
full time after 5 PM
part time 8 AM - 5 PM
part time after 5 P�1
TUESDAY THURSDAY SATURDAY
Descri.be the principal duties of the above employees:
� . u. •.- .. .. �� -
• - u . . . - . . _ . . .
• - • • . • . . _ - - - -
' �..�.� - -
Where will the above employees park their personal vehicles?
on-site ( 1 )# vehicles; on-street ( 2 )# vehicles;
elsewhere
Address, City
4. OTHER LOCATIONS
List other Bay Area branches of your firm: Ga„ Frnnr�,�r-�+ �,������ (City)
r,,., �,,,-,� ( C i ty )
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
�
Signatur '
t � v� c�� � -� � � � � .���
Name please print
-1� t�� � c� ��Q
Position with compa'
Date 5 =/� � �
�l D 3 Ca I ���r�„ ���
�i � � �� �+-.� �-- �i �( o t � .
Company a dress for correspondence
� `{C� ,� Ic�c�
Telephone number
12/29/80