Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1070 Broadway - Technical StudyF ,�.�� � �F ��- � �_ . ��`�i� �, y '� �� SF3fiXC053 ,, �'� �_'�p '���.'� �� � � .�.., :. �A , ... . , . : .Jff� �, f��`�sF4oXc� iz ,9._ ��- ��. a �'� . � .�.'�.:.. � o� �.. ` • � � ► � SF40XG174 � " �� + • � „♦ FSO4XC064 r'�:= ' � �� '� a; -Q � � , ��f L � � � � I � ��''t ipa� - � "r * 1 � : -, ' � � ;, �� � �k* �1t�11 �. � �. h' :�.,, �r T ;� �m----�--�.�'�� �� _ , �" .�.�,� ;.,.' y f� ��� � _ � ._ - � � ar�'�r�- �� !' � i � � � � �`y '' � AF�T' g�,)ll:i"Y�`.T� '� . � �:' '� � r� : FSO4XC072 a . � ■ ���� ��. . . � i �. - �;-, i� . . ��_ . .. . . � nli'. � ..F: _� , 'M1 �1 � � � �' �� FSO4XC321 � ��' � � � Q � s ..�. � � �-- O C) r� ,,�...�. � �'��.�� cV � � � � � � �.. �«'` � � m Z � � Z �,� ='��: � z q �� �- a t'.__. � — �C � r , ��,.. � �.. _ � "" _.� � - �.-. OE�C�S Y,,.�Ma p�� .�¢�y, ' . � . . . �, SO4XC075 Existi n � FSO4XC075 P ro osed p ��`.�� � � ��� e�, � � , - � � SF367 . .., � � r ri� .� ,,� �-f r ,� �`�SF40XC 112 � � +` _ ,u� . 1 ..s ae�,. . � � � �,/ . � '�, � ' ..,;a .� . � � l . ` � • � � � � �� FsoaX�osa � � �� 'b . `. � � � ' � �.! �.� , � � � _ � 1 ,� tu � �� xe � ..... ... �, ,.,,.-.. ..�f: ��' IC ' ' . n. � �iG _,�.IF�f(,lily ,...re � ., Y t�i,� L.� � —J,� - Exceliont Coverage � Good Coverage � Fair Coverage � PoorCoverage � No Coverage • r1rD'.ar 9��it•u;x;i I' � �. Fsoaxco7s � -' � � _� � r r� � �� i ��' ��' . � � �1 � �a � r� ; FSO4XC072 � " ,� � � ■ � �' :' ' �, i �11C a� ,.e . � k�. �,� �� F504XC321 .'"�"'�a�" ,. _ ♦ ,�� ' d r ; n� � _ q ..g..� „� .,.'� � t.� �a�yi:`7; k1At'_." �`�j' y � g � ,� d� ^ � - , ,� � .... _.� �.. �.�t� .. - � c• ffi�QQ� �� -- . c� C�l � �-+ � � Q Lj �S � % ` J '_ � � � � (TS , O� -. : � Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075 Miike Harvey Acura 1070 Broadway Burlingame, California 94010 San Mateo County 37.588278; - I 22.3634 I 7 NAD83 Rooftop EBI Project No. 62142377 April 22, 2014 Prepared for: Sprint Nextel c/o Town Consulting 100 Clement Street, 3rd floor San Francisco, CA 941 18 , � .� , �. � ��'' � �� ��. ��v t z zo��7 � �= rur,! f�c�,n�F. , :,:, � - Prepared by: EBI �o�S�ulti� � ,� environmental � engineering � due dii�t�ene� RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of Report Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by Sprint Nextel to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for Sprint Site FSO4XC075 located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed Sprint wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section I I.0 of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site. This document addresses the compliance of Sprint's proposed transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all existing collocated facilities at the site. MPE Summary At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed Sprint antennas, the maximum power density is 880.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all other carriers existing on this site combined with Sprint's proposed antennas is 880.8 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I 6 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the proposed Sprint antennas combined with the existing other carriers antennas on-site is 2.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.5 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Statement of Compliance Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage and installation of the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations. EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075 EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California I.O LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND EXISTING RF LEVELS This project involves the addition of thee (3) proposed antennas to the three (3) existing Sprint wireless telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. There are three sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be modified at the site, with one ( I) antenna to be installed per sector. Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T and T-Mobile wireless antennas are also present on the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis. 2.0 LOCATION OR ALL APPROVED (BUT NOT INSTALLED� ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND EXPECTED RF LEVELS FROM THE APPROVED FACILITIES There are no antennas or facilities that are approved and not installed based on information provided to EBI and Sprint at the time of this report. 3.0 NUMBER AND TYPES OF WIRELESS TELEGOMMUNICATION SITES (WTS� WITHIN I 00 FEET OF THE PROPOSED SITE With the exception of the antennas mentioned in Section I.O, there are no other Wireless Telecommunication Service (WTS) sites observed within I 00 feet of the proposed site. 4.0 LOCATION AND NUMBER OF THE SPRINT ANTENNAS AND BACK-UP FACILITIES PER STRUCTURE AND NUMBER AND LOCATION OF OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES ON THE PROPERTY Sprint proposes the addition of thee (3) proposed antennas to the three (3) existing Sprint wireless telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. There are three sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be modified at the site, with one ( I) antenna to be installed and one ( I) antenna to remain per sector. In each sector, there is proposed to be one antenna transmitting in the 2500 MHz frequency range, and one antenna transmitting in the 800 and 1900 MHz frequency ranges. The Sector A antennas will be oriented 285° from true north. The Sector B antennas will be oriented 100° from true north. The Sector C antennas will be oriented 220° from true north. The bottoms of the Sector A, B, and C antennas will be 4 feet above the penthouse rooftop. Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T and T-Mobile wireless antennas are also present on the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis. 5.O POWER RATING FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BACKUP EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO THE APPLICATION The operating power, for modeling purposes, was assumed to be 20 Watts per sector for the 2500 MHz antennas and there will be two (2) transmitters operating at this frequency per sector. The transmitter information used in the modeling of existing Sprint antennas that are to remain on-site is summarized in the RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix B. 6.0 TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS PER INSTALLATION AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS ON THE STRUCTURE The effective radiated power (ERP) for the 2500 MHz transmitters combined on-site is 3,056 Watts. The ERP for the existing Sprint transmitters combined on-site is 15,680 Watts. The ERP for other EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075 EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California carriers on-site was not provided; however, based on worst-case assumptions, the combined ERP for all other carriers on-site was calculated to be 36,217 Watts. 7.0 PREFERRED METHOD OF ATTACHMENT OF PROPOSED ANTENNA WITH PLOT OR ROOF PLAN INCLUDING: DIRECTIONALITY OF ANTENNAS, HEIGHT OF ANTENNAS ABOVE NEAREST WALKING SURFACE, DISCU55 NEARBY INHABITED BUILDINGS Based on the information provided to EBI, the proposed antennas are to be pipe-mounted on the penthouse roof, operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights mentioned in section 4.0 above. The rooftop is on a four story commercial structure located on the corner of a local street with some other commercial buildings to the north and west of the subject building. The majority of the immediate surrounding area is parking lot and street. 8.O ESTIMATED AMBIENT RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS FOR THE PROPOSED SITE Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Additionally, modeling indicates that the worst-case emitted power density does not exceed the FCC's general or occupational limits at the main roof level. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed Sprint antennas, the maximum power density is 880.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all other carriers existing on this site combined with Sprint's proposed antennas is 880.8 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I 6 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. The composite exposure level at the main roof level, from all carriers including Sprint's proposed antennas is 64.8% of the FCC's general public limit (12.96% of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the proposed Sprint antennas combined with the existing other carriers antennas on-site is 2.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.5 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The inputs used in the modeling are summarized in the RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix B. There were no exceedances of the FCC's general public or occupational limits from the other carriers on any walking/working surface. 9.0 SIGNAGE AT THE FACILITY IDENTIFYING ALL WTS EQUIPMENT AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FOR PEOPLE NEARING THE EQUIPMENT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE FCC ADOPTED STANDARDS (DISCU55 SIGNAGE FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK LANGUAGES OTHER THAN ENGLISH� Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. It is recommended that Notice signs be installed for the new antennas making people aware of the antennas locations. There are exposures above the FCC limits in front of the proposed antennas and therefore barriers are recommended. EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075 EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Workers that are elevated above the rooftop may be exposed to power densities greater than the occupational limit. Workers should be informed about the presence of antennas and their associated fields and praaice RF Safety Procedures. Access to this site is unknown. To be conservative, the modeling results are reported as though the general public is able to access the rooftop. I O.O STATEMENT ON WHO PRODUCED THIS REPORT AND QUALIFICATIONS Please see the certifications attached in Appendix A below. I I.O FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC� REQUIREMENTS The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect difFerent durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cmz). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz and 2500 MHz frequency ranges. For the Sprint equipment operating at 800 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 2.66 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.53 mW/cmz. These limits are considered protective of these populations. EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075 EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Fiaure 7. FCC Limits �or Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane-wave Equrvalent Power Density -_ . .__.. � __ _ _ — .,. � � OccupationaUL`witn�lled Expnsure N - Genera/ PapylalionfUncantrolled ExposiJre U i� ___ > � � � � � �, f0 � 01 5 � C � 0 ` p � _ " � � \ ,fi 1 � � p.2 � � � 0. 7 0.03 0.3 q 3 30 3QL1 �j 3,000 30,000 S 300,000 � � € 134 1.500 Yf�0,000 Frequency (MHz} EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane-wave equivalent power density Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin gender, size, or health. Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California of safety. These limits apply for continuous of safety for all persons, regardless of age, Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by Sprint in this area operate within a frequency range of 800-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) facilities used by Sprint in this area operate within a frequency range of 2496 - 2690 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets); and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units. Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS/AWS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. 12.0 LIMITATIONS This report was prepared for the use of Sprint Nextel. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. I 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed Sprint telecommunications equipment at the site located at I 070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from proposed Sprint antennas and the other carriers' existing antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements. As presented in the preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level. Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage and installation of the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations. EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 Appendix A Certifications Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 Reviewed and ftipproved by: 23625 Exp. '�2-31-15 Herbart). Stockinger., PE Senior Engineer Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California �. r��� �`�..'�—� � Note that EBI's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF- EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering and design of the building and related structures, as we{I as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the structuraf integrity of the buiiding, are sp�cifically excluded from E81's scope of wark. EBI Consulting RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62142377 Preparer Certification I, Jonathan Biederer state that: Site No. FSO4XC075 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California ■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. ■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. ■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and as they apply to RF-EME exposure. ■ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. .-c z.^---"' EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 ri��e�on RoofMazYFoolMazMMapMaxYMapMax%VOHset %OHset Numberofenvelope 170 160 180 170 30 10 1$U$41:$FXSU541:$FX5210 sData Standard Method Uptime ScaleFactaLowThr LowColor MidThr MiOColor HiT�r HiCalor OverColorApHtMul[ApHtMe[hoE 4 2 3 1 300 1 500 4 5000 2 3 1.5 1 a�ata It is advisable ro pravlde an ID (ant 1) lor all aniennas (MHz� Trans Trans Coax Coax Ocher Input Wlc (ft) (ft; ID Name Freq Power Count Len Type Loss Power Power Mfg Madel X Y SPTA1 Sprint 2500 20 2 301/2 LDF 0.5 33.]3339 KMW ET-X-WM-1 63 SPT81 Sprin[ 2500 20 2 301/2LDF 0.5 33.73339KMW ET-X-WM-1 64 SPTQ Sprint 2500 20 2 301/2LDF 0.5 33.73339KMW ET-X-WM-1 58 TMOA1 T�Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07173 Unknown Unknown 31 TMOH2 T�Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 31 TMOA3 T-Mobile 2100 15 4 0 0 0.5 53.47506 Unknown Unknown 31 TMOA6 T�Mobile 2300 15 4 0 0 0.5 53.0]506 Unknown Unknown 31 TMOel T-Mobile 1900 IS 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 77 TM082 T-Mobile 1900 15 4 0 � 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 76 TMOB3 T�Mobile ]300 15 0 0 0 0.5 53.4I506 Unknown Unknown 75 TMOB4 T-Mobile 2100 15 6 0 0 0.5 53.475W Unknown Unknown 74 TMOCl T-Mobiie 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknawn 31 TMOC2 T-Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 31 TMOC3 T-Mobile 2100 IS 4 0 0 0.5 53.47506 Unknown Unknawn 31 TMOC4 T-Mobile 2100 15 4 0 0 0.5 53A]506 Unknown Unknown 31 ATT A1 AT&T 850 30 4 0 0 3 60.14747 Unknown Unknown 70 ATT A2 NT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknown Unknown 65 ATT A3 AT&T 2300 40 2 0 0 3 40.09498 Unknown Unknown 62 FTT A4 AT&T 700 60 1 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 57 ATT B1 AT&T 850 30 4 0 0 3 60.1d247 Unknawn Unknown 54 ATT82 AT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknawn Unknown 54 ATT83 AT&T 2100 40 2 0 0 3 40.09698 Unknown Unknown 54 ATT64 AT&T 700 60 1 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknawn Unknown Si ATTC1 AT&T 850 30 6 0 0 3 60.1424] Unknown Unknown 5� ATTC2 AT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknown Unknown 62 ATT C3 AT&T 2100 40 2 0 0 3 40.09498 Unknown Unknown 65 ATT C4 AT&T 70D 60 1 0 0 3 30.07313 Unknown Unknown 69 SPTA1 Sprint 800 20 1 0 0 0.5 17.82502 KMW 65_rype 1 60 SPTAS Sprint 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_rype_3 60 SPTA1 Sprin[ 1900 ]0 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_type} 60 SPT Bl Sprint 800 70 1 0 0 0.5 1782502 KMW 65_[ype 1 60 SPTBl Sprin[ 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_type_3 60 SPTBl Sprint 1900 20 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_lype_I 60 SPTCI Sprin[ 800 20 1 0 0 0.5 17.8750] KMW 65_NPe} 59 SPTQ Sprin[ 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_type} 59 SPTCl Sprin[ 1900 20 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_rype 1 59 IDa[a Sym MapMarktRootX RoofY MapLabel Descriptlon�no[esforthistableonly) Sym 5 35ACUnit Samplesymbols Sym 14 S Roof A¢ess Sym 45 5 AC Unit Sym 45 20 Ladder (ft) Z 82 77 77 46 45 51 49 23 22 21 19 4] 45 43 41 86 86 86 86 83 76 73 70 68 68 68 68 81 81 BI 76 76 76 � � � Type 4 4 4 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 65.6 fi5.6 65.6 11.2 112 11.2 11.2 11.2 111 11.2 11.2 112 112 112 112 4 4 4 4 6 4 4 4 4 (ft� dBd BWdth Aper Galn PtDir 6 14.8 65;3G5 6 16.8 65;160 6 14.8 65;280 5 16 65;60 5 16 65;60 5 I6 65;60 5 16 65;60 5 16 65;300 5 16 65;300 5 16 65;300 5 16 65;300 5 16 65;180 5 16 65;180 5 16 fi5;180 5 16 65;180 5 17 65;60 5 16 65;60 5 16 65;60 5 12 65;60 5 12 65;300 5 16 65;300 5 16 65;300 5 12 65;300 5 12 65;180 5 16 fi5;180 5 16 65;180 5 12 65;180 6 132 70;345 6 15.9 60;345 6 15.9 60;345 6 132 70;160 6 15.9 60;160 6 15.9 60;160 6 13.2 70;280 6 15.9 60;280 6 15.9 60;280 Up[ime ON Pro�ile tlag ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON� ON• ON• ON� List 0} Area SL1541:SF%'