HomeMy WebLinkAbout1070 Broadway - Technical StudyF
,�.��
� �F ��- �
�_ .
��`�i� �, y '� �� SF3fiXC053
,,
�'� �_'�p '���.'� �� � � .�..,
:. �A
, ... . , . : .Jff� �,
f��`�sF4oXc� iz ,9._
��- ��.
a �'� . �
.�.'�.:.. � o� �.. ` •
� � ► � SF40XG174
� " �� + •
� „♦ FSO4XC064 r'�:= '
� ��
'� a; -Q � � , ��f L
� �
� �
I � ��''t ipa� -
� "r *
1 � :
-, ' �
� ;,
��
� �k* �1t�11 �. � �.
h' :�.,, �r T
;� �m----�--�.�'��
��
_ , �" .�.�,� ;.,.' y
f�
��� � _
� ._ -
�
� ar�'�r�- �� !' � i
� �
� �
�`y '' �
AF�T' g�,)ll:i"Y�`.T�
'�
.
�
�:' '�
� r� : FSO4XC072
a .
�
■ ���� ��. . .
� i
�. - �;-,
i� . . ��_ . .. .
.
� nli'. � ..F:
_� ,
'M1 �1
� �
� �'
�� FSO4XC321 � ��' � � � Q �
s ..�. � � �--
O C) r�
,,�...�. � �'��.�� cV � �
� �
� � �.. �«'` � � m Z
� � Z
�,� ='��: � z q
�� �- a
t'.__. � — �C
� r , ��,.. � �.. _ � "" _.� � - �.-.
OE�C�S Y,,.�Ma
p��
.�¢�y, '
. � . . . �,
SO4XC075 Existi n
�
FSO4XC075 P ro osed
p
��`.��
� �
��� e�, �
� , - � � SF367
. ..,
� � r
ri� .� ,,� �-f r
,� �`�SF40XC 112 �
� +` _ ,u�
. 1 ..s ae�,. . �
� � �,/ .
� '�, � ' ..,;a .� .
� � l
. ` �
• � � � �
�� FsoaX�osa � �
�� 'b .
`. � � � ' �
�.! �.� ,
� � � _
� 1 ,� tu
� ��
xe
� ..... ... �, ,.,,.-.. ..�f: ��'
IC ' '
. n.
� �iG _,�.IF�f(,lily ,...re � .,
Y t�i,� L.� � —J,�
- Exceliont Coverage
� Good Coverage
� Fair Coverage
� PoorCoverage
� No Coverage
• r1rD'.ar 9��it•u;x;i
I' �
�. Fsoaxco7s
�
-' �
� _�
� r r�
� ��
i ��' ��' . � � �1 � �a �
r� ; FSO4XC072
� " ,�
� � ■
�
�' :' ' �,
i �11C a�
,.e . �
k�.
�,�
�� F504XC321 .'"�"'�a�"
,. _
♦ ,�� '
d
r
; n�
� _ q
..g..� „� .,.'� � t.�
�a�yi:`7; k1At'_." �`�j' y �
g � ,� d�
^ � - , ,� � .... _.� �.. �.�t�
.. - �
c• ffi�QQ� ��
-- .
c�
C�l
�
�-+
�
�
Q Lj
�S �
% `
J '_
� �
� �
(TS ,
O�
-. :
�
Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) Compliance Report
Site No. FSO4XC075
Miike Harvey Acura
1070 Broadway
Burlingame, California 94010
San Mateo County
37.588278; - I 22.3634 I 7 NAD83
Rooftop
EBI Project No. 62142377
April 22, 2014
Prepared for:
Sprint Nextel
c/o Town Consulting
100 Clement Street, 3rd floor
San Francisco, CA 941 18
, � .�
, �. � ��'' � ��
��. ��v t z zo��7
� �= rur,! f�c�,n�F.
, :,:, � -
Prepared by:
EBI �o�S�ulti�
�
,� environmental � engineering � due dii�t�ene�
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by Sprint Nextel to conduct radio
frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for Sprint Site FSO4XC075 located at 1070 Broadway in
Burlingame, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed Sprint wireless
communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section I I.0 of this report, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of
RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure
to RF-EME fields.
This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site.
This document addresses the compliance of Sprint's proposed transmitting facilities independently and in
relation to all existing collocated facilities at the site.
MPE Summary
At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed Sprint antennas, the maximum power density
is 880.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I percent of the FCC's occupational limit).
The composite exposure level from all other carriers existing on this site combined with Sprint's
proposed antennas is 880.8 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I 6 percent of the FCC's
occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna.
At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the proposed Sprint antennas combined with
the existing other carriers antennas on-site is 2.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.5 percent
of the FCC's occupational limit).
Statement of Compliance
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof
level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage and installation of
the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
I.O LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND EXISTING RF LEVELS
This project involves the addition of thee (3) proposed antennas to the three (3) existing Sprint wireless
telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. There
are three sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be modified at the site, with one ( I) antenna to be installed
per sector.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T and T-Mobile wireless antennas are also
present on the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
2.0 LOCATION OR ALL APPROVED (BUT NOT INSTALLED� ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND
EXPECTED RF LEVELS FROM THE APPROVED FACILITIES
There are no antennas or facilities that are approved and not installed based on information provided to
EBI and Sprint at the time of this report.
3.0 NUMBER AND TYPES OF WIRELESS TELEGOMMUNICATION SITES (WTS� WITHIN I 00
FEET OF THE PROPOSED SITE
With the exception of the antennas mentioned in Section I.O, there are no other Wireless
Telecommunication Service (WTS) sites observed within I 00 feet of the proposed site.
4.0 LOCATION AND NUMBER OF THE SPRINT ANTENNAS AND BACK-UP FACILITIES PER
STRUCTURE AND NUMBER AND LOCATION OF OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION
FACILITIES ON THE PROPERTY
Sprint proposes the addition of thee (3) proposed antennas to the three (3) existing Sprint wireless
telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. There
are three sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be modified at the site, with one ( I) antenna to be installed
and one ( I) antenna to remain per sector. In each sector, there is proposed to be one antenna
transmitting in the 2500 MHz frequency range, and one antenna transmitting in the 800 and 1900 MHz
frequency ranges. The Sector A antennas will be oriented 285° from true north. The Sector B antennas
will be oriented 100° from true north. The Sector C antennas will be oriented 220° from true north.
The bottoms of the Sector A, B, and C antennas will be 4 feet above the penthouse rooftop.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T and T-Mobile wireless antennas are also
present on the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
5.O POWER RATING FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BACKUP EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO
THE APPLICATION
The operating power, for modeling purposes, was assumed to be 20 Watts per sector for the 2500
MHz antennas and there will be two (2) transmitters operating at this frequency per sector. The
transmitter information used in the modeling of existing Sprint antennas that are to remain on-site is
summarized in the RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix B.
6.0 TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS PER INSTALLATION AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS
FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS ON THE STRUCTURE
The effective radiated power (ERP) for the 2500 MHz transmitters combined on-site is 3,056 Watts.
The ERP for the existing Sprint transmitters combined on-site is 15,680 Watts. The ERP for other
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
carriers on-site was not provided; however, based on worst-case assumptions, the combined ERP for all
other carriers on-site was calculated to be 36,217 Watts.
7.0 PREFERRED METHOD OF ATTACHMENT OF PROPOSED ANTENNA WITH PLOT OR ROOF
PLAN INCLUDING: DIRECTIONALITY OF ANTENNAS, HEIGHT OF ANTENNAS ABOVE
NEAREST WALKING SURFACE, DISCU55 NEARBY INHABITED BUILDINGS
Based on the information provided to EBI, the proposed antennas are to be pipe-mounted on the
penthouse roof, operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights mentioned in section 4.0 above.
The rooftop is on a four story commercial structure located on the corner of a local street with some
other commercial buildings to the north and west of the subject building. The majority of the immediate
surrounding area is parking lot and street.
8.O ESTIMATED AMBIENT RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS FOR THE PROPOSED SITE
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof
level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse roof level.
Additionally, modeling indicates that the worst-case emitted power density does not exceed the FCC's
general or occupational limits at the main roof level.
At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed Sprint antennas, the maximum power density
is 880.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I percent of the FCC's occupational limit).
The composite exposure level from all other carriers existing on this site combined with Sprint's
proposed antennas is 880.8 percent of the FCC's general public limit (176. I 6 percent of the FCC's
occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna.
The composite exposure level at the main roof level, from all carriers including Sprint's proposed
antennas is 64.8% of the FCC's general public limit (12.96% of the FCC's occupational limit).
At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the proposed Sprint antennas combined with
the existing other carriers antennas on-site is 2.5 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.5 percent
of the FCC's occupational limit).
The inputs used in the modeling are summarized in the RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix B.
There were no exceedances of the FCC's general public or occupational limits from the other carriers
on any walking/working surface.
9.0 SIGNAGE AT THE FACILITY IDENTIFYING ALL WTS EQUIPMENT AND SAFETY
PRECAUTIONS FOR PEOPLE NEARING THE EQUIPMENT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE
APPLICABLE FCC ADOPTED STANDARDS (DISCU55 SIGNAGE FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK
LANGUAGES OTHER THAN ENGLISH�
Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially
exceed the MPE. It is recommended that Notice signs be installed for the new antennas making people
aware of the antennas locations. There are exposures above the FCC limits in front of the proposed
antennas and therefore barriers are recommended.
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
Workers that are elevated above the rooftop may be exposed to power densities greater than the
occupational limit. Workers should be informed about the presence of antennas and their associated
fields and praaice RF Safety Procedures.
Access to this site is unknown. To be conservative, the modeling results are reported as though the
general public is able to access the rooftop.
I O.O STATEMENT ON WHO PRODUCED THIS REPORT AND QUALIFICATIONS
Please see the certifications attached in Appendix A below.
I I.O FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC� REQUIREMENTS
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of
frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
(IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon
occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits
for members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/
controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental
passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see
below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE
limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by
frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular
facility and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect difFerent durations resulting from controlled and
uncontrolled exposures.
The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cmz). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz and 2500
MHz frequency ranges. For the Sprint equipment operating at 800 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is
2.66 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.53 mW/cmz. These limits are considered protective of
these populations.
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62142377 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
Fiaure 7. FCC Limits �or Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Plane-wave Equrvalent Power Density
-_ . .__.. � __ _ _ — .,.
� � OccupationaUL`witn�lled Expnsure
N - Genera/ PapylalionfUncantrolled ExposiJre
U i� ___
> �
�
� �
�
�, f0 �
01 5 �
C �
0 `
p � _ "
�
� \ ,fi
1 �
� p.2 � � �
0. 7
0.03 0.3 q 3 30 3QL1 �j 3,000 30,000 S 300,000
� � €
134 1.500 Yf�0,000
Frequency (MHz}
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
f = Frequency in (MHz)
* Plane-wave equivalent power density
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy
for several personal wireless services are summarized below:
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin
exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin
gender, size, or health.
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
of safety. These limits apply for continuous
of safety for all persons, regardless of age,
Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by Sprint in this area operate within a frequency range of
800-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets)
connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the
transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically
connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) facilities used by Sprint in this area operate within a frequency range
of 2496 - 2690 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets); and
2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual
subscriber units. Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS/AWS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate
energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for
exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly
in front of the antennas.
FCC Compliance Requirement
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
12.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of Sprint Nextel. It was performed in accordance with generally
accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same
locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information
provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any
additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our
conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance
with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of
this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
I 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed Sprint
telecommunications equipment at the site located at I 070 Broadway in Burlingame, California.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from proposed Sprint
antennas and the other carriers' existing antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and
ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements. As presented in
the preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density
may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at
the penthouse roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of Sprint's proposed antennas at the penthouse
roof level.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage and installation of
the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
Appendix A
Certifications
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
Reviewed and ftipproved by:
23625
Exp. '�2-31-15
Herbart). Stockinger., PE
Senior Engineer
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
�.
r��� �`�..'�—�
�
Note that EBI's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-
EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering and design
of the building and related structures, as we{I as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the
structuraf integrity of the buiiding, are sp�cifically excluded from E81's scope of wark.
EBI Consulting
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62142377
Preparer Certification
I, Jonathan Biederer state that:
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and
as they apply to RF-EME exposure.
■ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
.-c z.^---"'
EBI Consulting • 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
ri��e�on
RoofMazYFoolMazMMapMaxYMapMax%VOHset %OHset Numberofenvelope
170 160 180 170 30 10 1$U$41:$FXSU541:$FX5210
sData
Standard Method Uptime ScaleFactaLowThr LowColor MidThr MiOColor HiT�r HiCalor OverColorApHtMul[ApHtMe[hoE
4 2 3 1 300 1 500 4 5000 2 3 1.5 1
a�ata It is advisable ro pravlde an ID (ant 1) lor all aniennas
(MHz� Trans Trans Coax Coax Ocher Input Wlc (ft) (ft;
ID Name Freq Power Count Len Type Loss Power Power Mfg Madel X Y
SPTA1 Sprint 2500 20 2 301/2 LDF 0.5 33.]3339 KMW ET-X-WM-1 63
SPT81 Sprin[ 2500 20 2 301/2LDF 0.5 33.73339KMW ET-X-WM-1 64
SPTQ Sprint 2500 20 2 301/2LDF 0.5 33.73339KMW ET-X-WM-1 58
TMOA1 T�Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07173 Unknown Unknown 31
TMOH2 T�Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 31
TMOA3 T-Mobile 2100 15 4 0 0 0.5 53.47506 Unknown Unknown 31
TMOA6 T�Mobile 2300 15 4 0 0 0.5 53.0]506 Unknown Unknown 31
TMOel T-Mobile 1900 IS 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 77
TM082 T-Mobile 1900 15 4 0 � 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 76
TMOB3 T�Mobile ]300 15 0 0 0 0.5 53.4I506 Unknown Unknown 75
TMOB4 T-Mobile 2100 15 6 0 0 0.5 53.475W Unknown Unknown 74
TMOCl T-Mobiie 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknawn 31
TMOC2 T-Mobile 1900 15 4 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 31
TMOC3 T-Mobile 2100 IS 4 0 0 0.5 53.47506 Unknown Unknawn 31
TMOC4 T-Mobile 2100 15 4 0 0 0.5 53A]506 Unknown Unknown 31
ATT A1 AT&T 850 30 4 0 0 3 60.14747 Unknown Unknown 70
ATT A2 NT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknown Unknown 65
ATT A3 AT&T 2300 40 2 0 0 3 40.09498 Unknown Unknown 62
FTT A4 AT&T 700 60 1 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknown Unknown 57
ATT B1 AT&T 850 30 4 0 0 3 60.1d247 Unknawn Unknown 54
ATT82 AT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknawn Unknown 54
ATT83 AT&T 2100 40 2 0 0 3 40.09698 Unknown Unknown 54
ATT64 AT&T 700 60 1 0 0 3 30.07123 Unknawn Unknown Si
ATTC1 AT&T 850 30 6 0 0 3 60.1424] Unknown Unknown 5�
ATTC2 AT&T 1900 30 4 0 0 3 60.14247 Unknown Unknown 62
ATT C3 AT&T 2100 40 2 0 0 3 40.09498 Unknown Unknown 65
ATT C4 AT&T 70D 60 1 0 0 3 30.07313 Unknown Unknown 69
SPTA1 Sprint 800 20 1 0 0 0.5 17.82502 KMW 65_rype 1 60
SPTAS Sprint 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_rype_3 60
SPTA1 Sprin[ 1900 ]0 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_type} 60
SPT Bl Sprint 800 70 1 0 0 0.5 1782502 KMW 65_[ype 1 60
SPTBl Sprin[ 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_type_3 60
SPTBl Sprint 1900 20 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_lype_I 60
SPTCI Sprin[ 800 20 1 0 0 0.5 17.8750] KMW 65_NPe} 59
SPTQ Sprin[ 1900 20 2 0 0 0.5 35.65004 KMW 65_type} 59
SPTCl Sprin[ 1900 20 5 0 0 0.5 89.12509 KMW 65_rype 1 59
IDa[a
Sym MapMarktRootX RoofY MapLabel Descriptlon�no[esforthistableonly)
Sym 5 35ACUnit Samplesymbols
Sym 14 S Roof A¢ess
Sym 45 5 AC Unit
Sym 45 20 Ladder
(ft)
Z
82
77
77
46
45
51
49
23
22
21
19
4]
45
43
41
86
86
86
86
83
76
73
70
68
68
68
68
81
81
BI
76
76
76
�
�
�
Type
4
4
4
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
65.6
fi5.6
65.6
11.2
112
11.2
11.2
11.2
111
11.2
11.2
112
112
112
112
4
4
4
4
6
4
4
4
4
(ft� dBd BWdth
Aper Galn PtDir
6 14.8 65;3G5
6 16.8 65;160
6 14.8 65;280
5 16 65;60
5 16 65;60
5 I6 65;60
5 16 65;60
5 16 65;300
5 16 65;300
5 16 65;300
5 16 65;300
5 16 65;180
5 16 65;180
5 16 fi5;180
5 16 65;180
5 17 65;60
5 16 65;60
5 16 65;60
5 12 65;60
5 12 65;300
5 16 65;300
5 16 65;300
5 12 65;300
5 12 65;180
5 16 fi5;180
5 16 65;180
5 12 65;180
6 132 70;345
6 15.9 60;345
6 15.9 60;345
6 132 70;160
6 15.9 60;160
6 15.9 60;160
6 13.2 70;280
6 15.9 60;280
6 15.9 60;280
Up[ime ON
Pro�ile tlag
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON�
ON•
ON•
ON�
List 0} Area
SL1541:SF%'