HomeMy WebLinkAbout1070 Broadway - Technical StudyExisting FS(?4XCQ7� c�over�ge
Proposed FSO4XCC�75 cov�rage
CascadelD
FSO4XC063
FSO4XC064
FSO4XC067
FSO4XC072
FSO4XC075
F504XC321
SF36XC058
SF40XC114
Site Name
C&CSF + PG&E TOWER JEFFERSON SNEATH/MARTIN 10/68
PENINSULA PROFESSIONAL CENTER
C&CSF CRYSTAL SPRING GOLF COURSE - PG&E
EMPRESS COURT
MIKE HARVEY ACURA
1420 BURLINGAME AVE.
WESTIN HOTEL
US CONSOLIDATOR
Address
BETWEEN 280 & SKYLINE DR
1828 EL CAMINO REAL
6650 GOLF COURSE DR
433 AIRPORT BLVD.
1050 BROADWAY
1420 BURLINGAME AVE.
1 Old Bayshore Highway
888 Hinckley
City
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Millbrae
Burlingame
County
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
San Mateo
Zip
94010
94010
94010
94010
94010
94010
94030
94010
�
� ,
Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME)
Compliance Report
Prepared for:
Sprint Nextel
c/o Black & Veatch Corporation
2999 Oak Rd. Suite 910
Walnut Creek,CA 94597
Site No. FSO4XC075
Mike Harvey Acura
1070 Broadway
Burlingame, California 94010
San Mateo County
37.588300; - I 22.363300 NAD83
Site Type: rooftop
EBI Project No. 62121882
June 29, 2012
�I���� �' �.�.J
.o.. ,.....-
`; �=_ P 2 4 2012
.�� �
�_�. �
.�.� ,�
,�"-.' i ;r�E i�ir�r �
u�, ,, : ' " B, _ . �, ,:,�i.�
�' f_) N S U I.. T I I\ G
Creoting Vv�ue for Your 8usiness
�5 �� EBI 2 � B Street • Burlington, MA 0 I 803 • I.800.786.2346 i
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62121882
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by Sprint Nextel to conduct radio
frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for Sprint Site FSO4XC075 located at 1070 Broadway in
Burlingame, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from existing and proposed Sprint wireless
communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section I I.0 of this report, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of
RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human
exposure to RF-EME fields.
This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site.
This document addresses the compliance of Sprint's proposed transmitting facilities independently and in
relation to all collocated facilities at the site.
���T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1
,
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62121882 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
I.O LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND EXISTING RF LEVELS
This project involves the removal of three (3) existing antennas replaced with three (3) proposed Sprint
wireless telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California.
There are three Sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be replaced at the site, with one ( I) antenna that
may be re-installed per sector.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T also has wireless antennas on the rooftop.
These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
2.0 LOCATION OR ALL APPROVED (BUT NOT INSTALLED) ANTENNAS AND FACILITIES AND
EXPECTED RF LEVELS FROM THE APPROVED FACILITIES
There are no antennas or facilities that are approved and not installed based on information provided to
EBI and Sprint at the time of this report.
3.0 NUMBER AND TYPES OF WTS WITHIN I00 FEET OF THE PROPOSED SITE AND
ESTIMATES OF CUMULATIVE EMR EMISSIONS AT THE PROPOSED SITE
With the exception of the antennas mentioned in Section I.O, there are no other Wireless
Telecommunication Service (WTS) sites observed within 100 feet of the proposed site.
4.0 LOCATION AND NUMBER OF THE SPRINT ANTENNAS AND BACK-UP FACILITIES PER
BUILDING AND NUMBER AND LOCATION OF OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES
ON THE PROPERTY
Sprint proposes the removal of three (3)existing antennas replaced with three (3)proposed Sprint
wireless telecommunication antennas on a rooftop located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California.
There are three Sectors (A, B, and C) proposed to be replaced at the site, with two (2) antennas that
may be re-installed per sector. In each settor, there is proposed to be one antenna transmitting in the
800 MHz and the 1900 MHz frequency ranges. The Sector A antennas will be oriented 285° from true
north. The Sector B antennas will be oriented 100° from true north. The Sector C antennas will be
oriented 205° from true north. The bottoms of the antennas in all three sectors are 0 feet above the
nearest walking service.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, AT&T also has wireless antennas on the rooftop.
These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
5.0 POWER RATING FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BACKUP EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO
THE APPLICATION
The operating power for modeling purposes was assumed to be 20 Watts per transmitter for the 800
MHz antenna and there will be one (I) transmitter operating at this frequency. Additionally, for
modeling purposes it was assumed to be 20 Watts per transmitter and seven (� transmitters operating
at the 1900 MHz.
6.0 TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS PER INSTALLATION AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WATTS
FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS ON THE BUILDING
The effective radiated power (ERP) for the 800 MHz transmitter combined on site is 645 Watts. The
ERP for the 1600 MHz transmitters combined on site is 1,449 Watts. The ERP for the 1900 MHz
transmitters combined on site is 8,402 Watts. The ERPs for other carriers on site was not provided.
::�IEBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62121882
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
7.0 PREFERRED METHOD OF ATTACHMENT OF PROPOSED ANTENNA WITH PLOT OR ROOF
PLAN INCLUDING: DIRECTIONALITY OF ANTENNAS, HEIGHT OF ANTENNAS ABOVE
NEAREST WALKING SURFACE, DISCUSS NEARBY INHABITED BUILDINGS
Based on the information provided to EBI, the information indicates that the proposed antennas are to
be mounted atop the rooftop penthouse, operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights mentioned
in section 4.0 above. The site building is surrounded by other commercial buildings and parking lots.
8.0 ESTIMATED AMBIENT RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS FOR THE PROPOSED SITE
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
general public limit within approximately 16 feet of Sprint proposed antennas at the penthouse and
penthouse roof levels. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed
the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 6 feet of Sprint proposed antennas at the penthouse
and penthouse roof levels. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the proposed Sprint antennas,
the maximum power density is 2,505.30 percent of the FCC's general public limit (501.06 percent of the
FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all other carriers existing on this site
combined with Sprint's proposed antennas is 2,493.60 percent of the FCC's general public limit (498.72
percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surFace to each antenna. Based
on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground level related to the proposed Sprint
antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground
level, the maximum power density generated by the Sprint antennas combined with the existing other
carriers antennas on site is 2.70 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.54 percent of the FCC's
occupational limit). The inpuu used in the modeling are summarized in the RoofViewOO export file
presented in Appendix B.
There are no modeled areas on the rooftop or ground that exceed the FCC's limits for general public
or occupational exposure in front of the other carrier antennas.
9.0 SIGNAGE AT THE FACILITY IDENTIFYING ALL WTS EQUIPMENT AND SAFETY
PRECAUTIONS FOR PEOPLE NEARING THE EQUIPMENT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE
APPLICABLE FCC ADOPTED STANDARDS (DISCUSS SIGNAGE FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK
LANGUAGES OTHER THAN ENGLISH)
Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially
exceed the MPE. It is recommended that additional signage be installed for the new antennas making
people aware of the antennas locations. There are fields in front of the proposed antennas and
therefore barriers are recommended.
Additionally, there are areas where workers elevated above the rooftop may be exposed to power
densities greater than the general population and occupational limits. Workers and the general public
should be informed about the presence and locations of antennas and their associated fields.
Additionally, access to this site is accomplished via a roof access door located on the main roof. Access
to the facility is monitored and as such, but it should be assumed that the general public is still able to
access the rooftop.
I 0.0 STATEMENT ON WHO PRODUCED THIS REPORT AND QUALIFICATIONS
Please see the certifications attached in Appendix A below.
���T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62121882 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
I I.O FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of
frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
(IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and
NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon
occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits
for members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/
controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental
passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see
below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General pu6lic/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE
limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary
by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a
particular facility and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect difFerent durations resulting from controlled
and uncontrolled exposures.
The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mV1� over a unit surface area (cmz). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the and 1900 MHz
frequency range. For the Sprint equipment operating at 800 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 2.66
mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.53 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these
populations.
���T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62121882 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency Range Electric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Time
(MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) Power Density (S) �E]Z, [H]2, or S
(Vlm) �q�m� (mW/cm ) (minutes)
300-1,500 -- -- f/300 6
I,500- I 00,000 -- -- 5 6
(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency Range Electric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Time
(MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) Power Density (S) �E�z� �H]�, or S
(V/m) (A/m) �mW��m � (minutes)
0.3- I.34 614 I.63 ( I 00)* 30
I.34-30 824/f 2. I 9/f ( I 80/f )* 30
30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300-1,500 -- -- f/ 1,500 30
I,500- I 00,000 -- -- I.0 30
f = Frequency in (MHz)
* Plane-wave equivalent power density
Fi e FCC Limtts for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Plarie-wave Equivalent Pawer Density
I � Occupatrc:za[�Contro�feC Exposure
N
� --- - .Genera% Pop_;iabon�C%nccr:trn�ted � xnasurell
V !0�
� �
� `�
� `
y r„ `
.y ; \
C �
� �
�
� ! — — — — — — — — — -
� �\ i
O `
� L.Z �_ _ _ _ _, .
Q*
0.03 `��3 �r 3 3C ..u., I 3,OOt, 30.00? � 3Ct
�
r.� �.s�a �io�.con
Frequency (MHzj
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy
for several personal wireless services are summarized below:
::rIEBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous
exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age,
gender, size, or health.
RF-EME Compliance Report Site No. FSO4XC075
EBI Project No. 62121882 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by Sprint in this area operate within a frequency range of
800-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets)
connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the
transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically
connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate
energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for
exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly
in front of the antennas.
Statement of Compliance
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
12.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of Sprint Nextel. It was performed in accordance with generally
accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same
locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information
provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any
additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EB) so that our
conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance
with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of
this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made
I 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed Sprint
telecommunications equipment at the site located at I 070 Broadway in Burlingame, California.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from Sprint antennas
and the other carriers' existing antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and ensure
that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements. As presented in the
preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density
may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 16 feet of Sprint proposed antennas at
the penthouse and penthouse roof levels. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power
density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 6 feet of Sprint proposed
antennas at the penthouse and penthouse roof levels.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 9.0. Posting of the signage and installation of
the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
�ESI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.7862346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62121882
Appendix A
Certifications
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
�iIEBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62121882
Preparer Certification
I, Kyle Saunders, state that:
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and
as they apply to RF-EME exposure.
■ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62121882
Site No. FSO4XC075
1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California
Appendix B
Roofview0 Export File
:�EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
Map, Settings, Antenna, and Symbol Data Table .. Exported from workbook -> Roof View RF Template_Sprint Coi
Done on 6/22/2012 a[ 3:39:30 PM.
Use this format to prepare other data sets for the RoofView workbook f le
You may use as many rows in this TOP header as you wish.
The critical point are the cells in COLUMN ONE that read'Start...' (eg.StartMapDefinition
If used, these (4) headers are required to be spelled ezactly, as one word (eg. StartMapDeflnitlon
The very next row will be considered the start of that data block
The first row of the data block can be a header (as shown below), but this is optional
When building a text f le for import, Add the Map info first, then the Antenna data, followed by the symhol data
All rows above the first marker line'Start...' will be Ignored, no matter how many there are
Thls area is for you use for documentation.
End of help commenu.
You can place as much text here as you wish as long as you don't place it below
the Start Map Definition row below the blue line.
You may insert more rows using the Insert menu.
Should you need additional lines to document your project, simply insert additional row�
by highlighting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking on the Insert mern
and selecting rows.
tMapDefinition
Roof Max YRoof Max %Map Max YMap Maz X Y Offset X Offset mber of Ar� envelope
170 170 190 210 20 0 1 :$31:$FX$2:$31:$FX$200
ri5ettir�gsData
Standard Method Uptime ScaleFactoi LowThr LowColor MldThr MldColor
4 2 1 1 100 1 500 4
rtArttenna�i� to provide an ID (ant 1) for all antennas
(MHz) Trans Trans Coax Coax Other
ID Name Freq Fower Count Len Type Loss
SPTA1 Sprint 600 20 1 10 1/2LDF 0.5
SPT A1 Sprint 1900 20 2 SO 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPTA1 Sprint 1900 20 5 10 1/2LDF 0.5
SPT BS Sprint 800 20 1 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPT B1 Sprint 1900 20 2 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPT Bl Sprint 1900 20 5 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPT Cl Sprint 1900 20 1 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPT Cl Sprint 1900 20 2 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
SPT Cl Sprint 1900 20 5 10 1/2 LDF 0.5
ATTA1 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATTA2 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATT A3 AT&T B50 25 1 3
ATTA4 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATT81 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATTB2 AT&T B50 25 1 3
ATTB3 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATT84 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATTC1 AT&T B50 25 1 3
ATTC2 AT&T 850 25 1 3
ATT C3 AT&T B50 25 1 3
ATT C4 AT&T 850 25 1 3
irtSymbolData
Sym Nap Marke Roof X Roof Y Map La6el notes for thls table only �
Sym 5 35 ACUnit mplesymbols
Sym 14 5 Roof Access
Sym 45 5 ACUnit
Sym 45 20 Ladder
HiThr HiColor OverColor
5000 2 3
Input
Power
Calc
Pawer
16.86669516
33.73339031
84.33347578
16.86669516
33.73339031
6433347578
16.86669516
33.73339031
84.33347578
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
12.52968084
Mfg
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
KMW
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Ap Ht Mult
1.5
Model
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_B00_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
1900_800_KMW_65_Type_1
p Ht Method
1
(k�
X
15
15
15
17
17
17
14
14
14
3
6
8
il
32
30
28
24
20
17
14
5
(ft)
Y
20
20
20
19
19
19
18
18
18
17
23
27
31
20
15
31
5
3
4
6
11
(ft�
Z
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
71
71
71
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
List Of Areas
$K$31:$FX$200
7ype
(k)
Aper
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4,5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
dBd
Gain
13.2
15.9
15.9
13.2
15.9
15.9
13.2
15.9
15.9
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
BWd[h Uptime
Pt Dir Profile
70;285
60;265
60;285
70;100
60;300
60;100
�o;zos
60;205
60;205
65;130
65;130
65;130
65;130
65;225
65;225
65;225
65;225
65;350
65;350
65;350
65;350
ON
flag
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON�
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•