The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1070 Broadway - Technical StudyA CNU0530 Before MOD RSCP Plot (without 5C ��CCU2062 !�►�u �li� �r�uoaa� �U6146 � �.:, ,� '� :� ,_ 0480 � +N U 0566 .�z; ��?°. �,, � CNU0530 Optimized - RSCP_Plat_-0$}16I2012 � � Besk Signal Level (dBm] >=-In-Builtlinr Best Signal Level (dBm] >=•In-Ti:uisit Besk Signal Level (dBmJ >=-Dut[looT . .� I ► � �NU0072 C7� U 0530 CJ .. , , . . . . ., . ., _ .: ., ., .,.. . : . . .,,. .. _ , � ' _ . . , �,, � ,_ , . _ ■ � ._, — ; � ._- .�. ,.�_ . ,. � - . , ....,,, , :� _ . � ,- � ' � 1070 BROADWAY CNU0530 After MOD RSCP Plot (with 5C ��CU 2062 `; J CNU0530 Opkimized - RSCP_Plot_-08f16f2012 ` � Best Signal Level (dBm] >=•I11-B11i1CliliT Best Signal LeVel (dBmJ >=•In-Ti:utsit Best Signal Level [dBmJ >=-Qilt[looT . � ► � �r�uoao� �cuslas G7�U0530 �1 .,� � . �A" , I � � ..:y"+F`:."1 � i �� _ 4uoaso _ , � � �Nuoa�2 _ . , _. . .:..... -. . ,. ,,:. . .. ...,,. „ , , ,., ..: .. .. ., . . , , .� �, - ,.r. . , ,,; -, . , ,: , +� .. . . .,,. A�? - . . . . . �:-�J ■ -..�,i _• „ ' '.____" . . .,.. � . ., . �._ ,.. , .._� �. � f� .., ' ---. . .. .. . . . . . . , .., � � �hJU0566 :� r� � �:_ .�� t r �,� � - � i c,- „ : , .� ..:�. � . 1070 BROADWAY Distance of neighbor sites 1070 BROADWAY y 3�,�e:t�� ,� - '� r ;3�"`�. • »a n 'i - . ; �"�� __, _tu ...- Proposed � dose up view 1 � � Advance - .._ z;,,- :�.�,�r,�;��,, . �,,,,. Vroposed AT&T Mtennas + 1 �.aicS�v+�----___�..� - ._'.�..v- �. ..s• .. .- YR-„��i �...-. . . �.-.: .: . .. . Y. . . �_-.. .f A� . � .. _ �.-=te?:.�` S :§.�e �; '.-�:._. .. .. y...�, t r.ai� .,. "_ view from Broadway looking norrh ar srte AT�T Wlreless CNU0530Hwy101 � 1070 Broadway, 8urlingame, CA RECEIVED JUN 26 2012 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. r��n�::i � y;; i?oz a;u� REC�I�� JUN 2 6 20i2 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PIANNING DIV. ♦ Proposed x ��'�,.� �.� . \ � �_ ��.� ,� " \ � ,� ' _ `•\ �� f, Noposed AT&T Mtennas �u� � �f x i �, 7 close up view �dvance��.n.,�: F�;oio _ i��u-a�.c� �o!un:�r � i ontart 1 Y7'; 7!02-HSi); _�,'�� -- _ � view from Rollins Road looking south atsite AT�T Wlreless CNU0530Hwy ]O1 — 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, CA R�C�IV�� JUN 2 6 1DiZ CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING D1V. �' r � � Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report Prepared for: AT&T Mobility, LLC c/o Black & Veatch Corporation 5000 Executive Parkway Ste. 430, San Ramon, CA, 94583 �r=�� ECEIVED .�� " �� ° ��,< USID# 13292 Site No. CNU0530 JUN 2 6 2012 Hwy I 0 I -Broadway I 070 Broadwa CITY OF BURLINGAME y CDD-PLANNING DIV. Burlingame, California 94010 San Mateo County 37.588330; - I 22.383360 NAD83 Site Type: rooftop EBI Project No. 62121908 June 20, 2012 Al�k Ai F � WFCQ .]S �t31i1 ..76 1Dtr /.' Y CC7NSi.3LTING Cre�tirrg Va1us for Your B�sir�ess ,: r t RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 TABLE OF CONTENTS Personnel Gertifications Antenna Inventory RoofViewOO Export File RooNiewOO Graphic Compliance/Signage Plan Microwave Modeling APPENDICES EXECUTIVESUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... I I.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION �FCC� REQUIREMENTS ................................... 3 3.0 AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................... 5 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING ................................................................................. 5 5.0 RECOMMENDED SIGNAGE/COMPLIANCE PLAN .................................................................... 7 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................. 8 7.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................... Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F =�EBI USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California ............................................. 8 • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site CNU0530 located at 1070 Broadway in Burlingame, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section 2.0 of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site, including the following: ■ Antenna Inventory ■ Site Plan with antenna locations ■ Antenna inventory with relevant parameters for theoretical modeling ■ Graphical representation of theoretical MPE fields based on modeling ■ Graphical representation of recommended signage and/or barriers This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. Statement of Compliance A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. Per AT&T's corporate policy, the FCC's general population limits are applicable to all rooftop sites, regardless of the level of access control. As presented in the sections below, based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of AT&T's proposed antennas at the main roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 6 feet of AT&T's proposed antennas at the main roof level. AT&T Recommended Signage/Compliance Plan AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated December 9, 201 I, requires that: I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. Site compliance recommendations have been developed based upon protocols presented in AT&T's RF Exposure guidance document, dated December 9, 201 I, additional guidance provided by AT&T, EBI's understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, and common industry practice. Barrier locations have �EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786Z346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California been identified (when required) based on guidance presented in AT&T's RF Exposure Policy guidance document, dated December 9, 201 I. The following signage is recommended at this site: ■ Green INFO I sign posted on or next to the access door and on the barrier at Sector B and C. ■ Blue NOTICE sign posted on the barrier near the Sector B and C antennas. The signage proposed for installation at this site complies with AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document and therefore complies with FCC and OSHA requirements. Barriers are recommended on this site. More detailed information concerning site compliance recommendations is presented in Section 5.0 and Appendix E of this report. �EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 ., RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 I .0 SITE DESCRIPTION USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California This project involves the proposed installation of up to twelve (12) wireless telecommunication antennas on a rooftop in Burlingame, California. There are three sectors (A, B and C) proposed at the site. The current plans for the site include four (4) proposed antennas per sector, a total of twelve (12) antennas to be installed on the site. In each sector, there are assumed to be two UMTS antennas transmitting in bands of 850 MHz and 1900 MHz frequencies, one GSM antenna transmitting in the GSM 850 MHz and GSM 1900 MHz frequencies, and one LTE antenna transmitting in the 700 MHz frequency. The Sector A GSM/UMTS antennas will be oriented 340° from true north. The Sector A LTE antenna will be oriented 335° from true north. The Sector B GSM/UMTS antennas will be oriented 220° from true north. The Sector B LTE antenna will be oriented 215° from true north. The Sector C GSM/UMTS antennas will be oriented 100° from true north. The Sector C LTE antenna will be oriented 95° from true north. The bottoms of the Sector A and B I antennas will be 67 feet above ground level. The bottoms of the remaining Sector B and Sector C antennas will be four and five feet over the main roof level. Appendix B presents an antenna inventory for the site. Access to this site is accomplished via a door in the penthouse located on the main roof. Both roof access doors are presumed to be unlocked and, as such, the general public is able to access the rooftop. 2.0 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC� REQUIREMENTS The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Table I and Figure I(below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular '� ESI 2 � g Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 1 � 1 : RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 EBI Project No. 62121908 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California facility and are "time-averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cmz). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 850 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 2.83 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.57 mW/cmz. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 2.33 mW/cmz and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.47 mW/cmz. These limits are considered protective of these populations. Table I: Limits for Ma�cimum Permissible Exposure (MPE} , (A) Limits for Occupatianal/Controlled Exposure' Frequency Range Electric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Tirne Power Density (S) ' (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) ' 2 [E]2, [H]2, or S ��m� ��m� (mW/cm ) ' ' (minutes) 0.3-3.0 6 I 4 I.63 ( I 00)'k 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f )* 6 30-300 61.4 0. I 63 I.0 6 300-1,500 -- -- f/300 6 I,500- I 00,000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Range E[ectric Field Magnetic Field Averaging Time Power Density (S} (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (H) [E]�, [H]2, or S (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm2) ' (minutes) 0.3- I.34 6 I 4 I.63 ( I 00)" 30 I.34-30 824/f 2. I 9/f ( I 80/fZ)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 -- -- f/ I ,500 30 I,500- I 00,000 -- -- I.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane-wave equivalent power density Fiaure t. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (tiRPE) Plane-wave Equivaleni PowerDensity N >U �� > � Y i0 N 5 C � � � � O Qz a �EBI o. t L 0_03 �W.__....�....�..�__— __._...�__ _m._e..�.__, � Occupaliona7/Conbailed Exposvre j ---- Generat Population/Uncon8olled Expasurei �` � � � � � � � ��— i `�----' 0.3 q 3 3Q 300 j 3,000 30.OQD } 30D,000 � � � 1.31 i,S00 10D.COQ �requency (MHz) treet • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 EBI Project No. 62121908 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible F�cposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. 3.0 AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated December 9, 201 I, requires that: I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. Pursuant to this guidance, worst-case predictive modeling was performed for the site. This modeling is described below in Section 4.0. Lastly, based on the modeling and survey data, EBI has produced a Compliance Plan for this site that outlines the recommended signage and barriers. The recommended Compliance Plan for this site is described in Section 5.0. 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofViewOO software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site rooftop and ground-level resulting from operation of the antennas. RoofViewOO is a widely-used predictive modeling program that has been developed by Richard Tell Associates to predict both near field and far field RF power density values for roof-top and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially-averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit. �`x EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. � RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 EBI Project No. 62121908 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T, and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T, and information gathered from other sources. Two unknown carriers also have antennas on the rooftop. Information about these antennas was included in the modeling analysis. Per AT&T's corporate policy, the FCC's general population limits are applicable to all rooftop sites, regardless of the level of access control. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of AT&T's Sector B antennas on the main roof level and 8 feet of AT&T's Sector C antennas on the main roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 6 feet of AT&T's Sector B antennas on the main roof level and 5 feet of AT&T's Sector C antennas on the main rooftop level. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 1,546.30 percent of the FCC's general public limit (30926 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 2,363.40 percent of the FCC's general public limit (472.68 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 9.60 percent of the FCC's general public limit ( I.92 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). There were also worst-case predicted exposures above the general public MPE in front of the Sector B and C Unknown carrier 2 antennas. However, modeling indicates that the AT&T contribution to these areas is 5% or less of the general public MPE and, as such, under FCC regulations, AT&T is not responsible for these predicted exceedances. The inputs used in the modeling are summarized in the RoofViewOO export file presented in Appendix C. A graphical representation of the RoofViewOO modeling results is presented in Appendix D. It should be noted that RoofViewOO is not suitable for modeling microwave dish antennas; however, these units are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground- level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated December 9, 201 I, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There were 2 microwaves belonging to other carriers included in the modeling analysis. Formulas from OET Bulletin 65 were used to calculate a worst-case prediction of the maximum power density (MPE) at ground level and nearest walking surfaces for these microwave dishes. Power density estimates used for the microwave dishes proposed for installation at this site are included in Appendix F. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas, including microwaves and panel antennas, is approximately 2363.4 percent of the general public limit (472.68 percent of the occupational limit). =w=�E$I 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 5.0 RECOMMENDED SIGNAGE/COMPLIANCE PLAN USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: ■ Be posted at a conspicuous point; ■ Be posted at the appropriate locations; ■ Be readily visible; and ■ Make the reader aware of the potential risks rp ior to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. Informational Signs INFO I _�., �__.�.�w,. � I N F O 2 � �� INFO 3 : INFO 4 Alerting Signs , '�� NOTICE i. H�.'wd T3n Pamr��w.< mezhcRF ' ncwd iie ECC ::Gee�r R+�ct�a Equun Lm�� .s.a�ev+www.ypw aa sam� ` �j _....... .............._ c�ur�o�' �,� ';e,�,,,r�;,�;,,,��,: CAUTION 3re wttrcyt.wvoEN+t - 8F Ea ' F� C iet3'��.•tl�a.v: Er{�� iiz�Rs oe¢Raewz�aoqau.. � r.muFe:fri.e�.a �i ; �I j WARNING :Bnam171us Paiuyvu m; ;..Y.ml��. �eP.1a...L�.i -�'vae�mcroa .W3aFYY j ICam�>l'c3 i.qccmi.m� : t+►� x Aq u t+r': p* w-s i :PW.w�mnf .a Based upon protocols presented in AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated December 9, 201 I, and additional guidance provided by AT&T, the following signage is recommended on the site: �EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 Recommended Signage: USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California ■ Green INFO I sign posted on or next to the access door and on the barrier at Sectors B and C. ■ Blue NOTICE sign posted on the barrier near the Sector B and C antennas. Barriers should be installed I I feet in front of the AT&T Sector B antennas and 8 feet in front of the Sector C antennas. Barriers may consist of rope, chain, or fencing. Painted stripes should only be used as a last resort. If painted stripes are selected as barriers, it is recommended that the stripes and signage be illuminated. The signage and any barriers are graphically represented in the Signage Plan presented in Appendix E. 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed AT&T telecommunications equipment at the site located at I 070 Broadway in Burlingame, California. EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from AT&T antennas and other carriers' antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements, as well as AT&T's corporate RF safety policies. As presented in the preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of AT&T's proposed antennas at the main roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 6 feet of AT&T's proposed antennas at the main roof level. Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Section 5.0 and Appendix E. Posting of the signage and installation of the recommended barriers brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations and AT&T's corporate RF safety policies. 7.0 LIMITATIONS This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. �EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 Appendix A Certifications USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California �EBI 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Repart EBl Project Na. 62121908 Site No_ CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Reviewed and Approved by: �� V � y 4 � / � 'Ki� �y,t. i�, �i�.r� �i�,� . �i(�!�{ ��' C. �' '4�' E)tgs�39$ � t: � � * �,tp � �o G� .� ---____ , , sx. .cc� . . at � CAL sealed 20june2012 Michael McGuire Efettrical Engneer Note that EBI's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy {RF- EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this reporY. The engineering and design of the building and related structures, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBI's scope of work. EBI Consulting RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 Preparer Certification I, Glenn Gould, state that: USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California ■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. ■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. ■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and as they apply to RF-EME exposure. ■ I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated 12/09/I I) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofViewOO modeling software. ■ I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. (�J_ �: "� `�,.,.�.,c.,�'t.� ;v��`�""�_. .�``-'��I � ,,. �iiEBI 2 � B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 Appendix B Antenna Inventory USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California �,� ��T 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800J86.2346 1 RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 EBI Project No. 62121908 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Antenna Antenna TXFreq ERP Gain Azimukh I.en,gth Horizantal Z Operator Model Beamwid�h X Y Z (Antenna Number Type (MHz) (Watts) (dBd) (deg.) (feet)° �Deg.) Face) ATT AI AT&T Panel LTE 700 633 12.15 Kathrein 80010764 335 4.6 68 10 30 67.7 0 ATT A2 AT&T Panel UMTS 850 I 175 13.35 Kathrein 742-265 340 6.28 68 10 28 66.86 0 ATT A2 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 777 I 6.05 Kathrein 742-265 340 6.28 65 10 28 66.86 0 ATT A3 AT&T Panel GSM 850 1612 12.45 Andrew TBXLHB- 340 4.34 72 10 26 67.83 0 6565A-R2M ATT A3 AT&T Panel GSM 1900 2813 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- 340 434 65 10 26 67.83 0 6565A-R2M ATT A3 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 813 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- 340 4.34 65 10 26 67.83 0 6565A-R2M ATT A4 AT&T Panel UMTS 850 1480 I 3.35 Kathrein 742-265 340 6.28 68 10 24 66.86 0 ATT A4 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 1048 I6.05 Kathrein 742-265 340 6.28 65 10 24 66.86 0 ATT BI AT&T Panel LTE 700 633 12.15 Kathrein 80010764 215 4.6 68 I I 22 67.7 0 ATT B2 AT&T Panel UMTS S50 955 I3.35 Kathrein 742-265 220 6.28 68 14 22 4.277 0 ATT B2 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 777 I6.05 Kathrein 742-265 220 6.28 65 14 22 4.277 0 ATT B3 AT&T Panel GSM 850 I 356 12.45 Andrew TBXLHB- 220 4.34 72 16 22 5.247 0 6565A-R2M ATT B3 AT&T Panel GSM 1900 2813 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- z20 4.34 65 I6 22 5.247 0 6565A-R2M ATT 63 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 813 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- 220 4.34 65 16 22 5.247 0 6565A-R2M ATT B4 AT&T Panel UMTS 850 1480 13.35 Kathrein 742-265 220 6.28 68 IS 22 4.277 0 ATT B4 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 I I22 16.05 Kathrein 742-265 220 6.28 65 IS 22 4.277 0 ATT CI AT&T Panel LTE 700 633 12.IS Kathrein 80010764 95 4.6 68 20 25 5.I 17 0 ATT C2 AT&T Panel UMTS 850 934 13.35 Kathrein 742-265 100 6.28 68 20 27 4.277 0 �-�. ��T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 1 RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 EBI Project No. 62121908 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Antenna ' Antenna TX Freq ERP Gain Azimuth Length Horizontal Z Operator Model Beamwidth X Y Z '(Antenna ' Number Type (MHz) (Watts) (dBd) (deg.) (fe�t) ,(Deg.) �ace) ATT C2 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 832 16.05 Kathrein 742-265 100 6.28 65 20 27 4.277 0 ATT C3 AT&T Panel GSM 850 1612 12.45 Andrew TBXLHB- 100 434 72 20 28 5.247 0 6565A-R2M ATT C3 AT&T Panel GSM 1900 4500 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- 100 434 65 20 28 5.247 0 6565A-R2M A7T C3 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 813 14.65 Andrew TBXLHB- 100 434 65 20 28 5.247 0 6565A-R2M ATT C4 AT&T Panel UMTS S50 1480 I3.35 Kathrein 742-265 100 6.28 68 20 31 4.277 0 ATT C4 AT&T Panel UMTS 1900 I 122 16.05 Kathrein 742-265 100 6.28 65 20 31 4.277 0 UNKI AI Unknown Panel 850 484 12 Unl<nown 345 3.5 63 IS 26 3 0 UNKI BI Unknown Panel 850 484 12 Unknown 220 3.5 63 16 25 3 0 UNK I CI Unknown Panel 850 484 12 Unl<nown I 10 3.5 63 I S 25 3 0 UNK2AI Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unl<nown 250 3.5 63 50 38 6.997 0 UNK2 A2 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unl<nown 250 3.5 63 51 37 6.997 0 UNK2 A3 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unl<nown 250 3.5 63 52 36 6.997 0 UNK2 A4 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown 250 3.5 63 53 35 6.997 0 UNK2 BI Unknown Panel S50 121 12 Unknown I50 3.5 63 40 I 1 6.997 0 UNK2 62 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown I50 3.5 63 39 I I 6.997 0 UNK2 B3 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unl<nown 150 3.5 63 38 I I 6.997 0 UNK2 B4 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown I50 3.5 63 37 I I 6.997 0 UNK2 CI Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown 100 3.5 63 36 I I 6.997 0 UNK2 C2 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unl<nown IOU 3.5 63 35 I I 6.997 0 ��' �� EBI Z I B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • I.800.786.2346 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Horizantal Z Antenna Operator Antenna TX Freq ERP Gain Mod�� Azimuth Length B�amwidth X Y' Z (Antenna Number TYPe , (MHz) (Watts) (dBd) {deg.) (feet) (Deg.) ' Face) UNK2 C3 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown 100 3.5 63 34 I I 6.997 0 UNK2 G4 Unknown Panel 850 121 12 Unknown 100 3.5 63 33 I I 6.997 0 MCWV I Unknown Microwave Unknown Unknown Unl<nown Unl<nown Unknown 2 Unknown NA NA 8 N/A MCWV 2 Unknown Microwave Unknown Unknown Unknown Unl<nown Unknown 2 Unknown NA NA 8 N/A I. Note that EBI uses an assumed set of antenna specifications and powers for unknown and other carrier antennas for modeling purposes. 2. Note there are only 4 AT&T antennas per sector at this site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on different lines. 3. Note that formulas from OET Bulletin 65 were used to calculate a worst-case prediction of the maximum power density (MPE) at ground level and nearest walking surfaces for the AT&T microwave dishes. RoofView is not suitable for modeling microwave dish antennas because these units are designed for point- to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground level coverage _=i-=��T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 1 RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Appendix C Roofview0 Export File � _ � � 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 Map, Settings, Antenna, and Symhol Data Ta61e .. Exported from workbook-> Roof View RF Template_ATT Composite.zl� Done on 6/14/2012 at 10:13:01 AM. Use this format to prepare other data sets for the RootView workbook file. � You may use as many rows In this TOP header as you wish. � The critical poin[ are the cells in COLUMN ONE that read'Start...' (eg. StartMapDe(inition If used, these (4) headers are required to be spelled euactly, as one word (eg.StanMap�efinitlon; . The very nex[ row will be mnsidered the start of that data block. The first row of the data block can be a header (as shown below�, but this is optional. When building a text file for import, Add the Map info first, then [he Antenna data, followed by the symbol da[a All rows above the first marker line'Stan...' will be ignored, no matter how many there are This area is for you use for documentation. End of help commen[s. You can place as much tezt here as you wlsh as long as you don'[ place it below [he Start Map Definition row below the blue line. � You may Insert more rows using the Insert menu. Should you need additional lines to document your project, simply insert additional rpws by highlighting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking on the Insert mew , and selecting rows � � � � Roof Maz V Roof Max % Map Maz V Map Max X 70 90 80 100 Standard Me[hod Uptime Scale Factor 4 2 3 1 ;��dvisable to provide an 10 (ant 1) for all an[ennas (MHx) Trans ID Name Freq Power ATTA1 LTE 700 31.6227766 ATTA2 UMTS 850 89.12509381 ATTA2 UMTS 1900 31.6227766 ATTA3 GSM 850 50.11872336 ATT A3 GSM 1900 31.62277fi6 ATTA3 UMTS 1900 45.70881896 ATTA4 UMTS 850 112.2018454 ATTA4 UMTS 1900 42.65795188 ATT Bl LTE 700 31.6227766 ATT 82 UMTS 850 72.44359601 ATT B2 UMTS 1900 31.6227766 ATT 83 GSM 850 31.6227766 ATT B3 GSM 1900 31.6227766 ATT B3 UMTS 1900 45.70881896 ATT B4 UMTS S50 112.2018454 ATT B4 UMTS 1900 45.70881896 ATTCl LTE 700 31.6227766 ATT C2 UMTS 850 70.79457844 ATTC2 UMTS 1900 33.88441561 ATT C3 GSM B50 50.11872336 ATT C3 GSM 1900 31.6227766 ATTC3 UMTS 1900 45.70881896 ATTC4 UMTS 850 112.2018454 ATTC4 UMTS 1900 45.70881896 UNKl AS Unknown 850 100 UNKl Bl UnknOwn 850 300 UNKl Cl Unknown 850 100 UNK2A1 Unknown 850 25 UNK2A2 Unknown S50 25 UNK2 A3 Unknown S50 25 UNK2A4 Unknown S50 25 UNK2 Bl Unknown 850 25 UNK2 62 Unknown S50 25 V Offset IC Offse[ mber of An envelope 30 30 1 5141:SDF5:5141:SDF5210 Low Thr Low Color Mid Thr Mid Color Hi Thr Hi Color Over Color 100 1 500 4 5000 2 3 Trons Count 2 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coax Coaz Other Input Len Type Loss Power Calc Power 63.2455532 89.12509381 31.6227766 150.3561701 158.113883 45.70881896 112.2018454 42.65795188 63.2455532 72.44359601 31.6227766 126.4911064 158.113883 45.70881896 112.2018454 45.70881896 63.2455532 70.79457844 33.88441561 150.3561701 252.9822128 45.70881896 112.2018454 45.70881896 50.11872336 50.11872336 50.11872336 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 Mfg Kathrein Kathrein Kathrein Andrew Andrew Andrew Kathrein Ka[hrein Kathrein Ka[hrein Kathrein Andrew Andrew Andrew Kathrein Kathrein Ka[hrein Kathrein Kathrein Andrew Andrew Andrew Kathrein Kathrein Ap Ht Mult 1.5 Model 80010764 742-265 742-265 TBXLHB-6565A-R2M TBl(LHB-6565A-R2M TBXLHB-6565A-R2M 742-265 742-265 80010764 742-265 742-265 TBXLHB-6565A-R2M 7BxLHB-6565A-R2M TBxLHe-6565A-R2M 742-265 742-265 800107fi4 742465 742-265 TBXLHB-6565A-R2M TBXLHB-6565A-R2M TBXLHB-6565A-R2M 742-265 742-265 ,p H[ Method 1 Ih) X 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 14 14 16 16 16 18 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 15 16 15 50 51 52 53 40 39 �fq Y 30 28 28 26 26 26 24 24 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 25 27 27 28 28 28 31 31 2G 25 25 38 37 36 35 11 11 (fc) Z 67.7 66.86 66.86 67.83 67.83 67.83 66.86 66.86 67.7 4.277 4.277 5.247 5.247 5.247 4.277 4.277 5.117 4.277 4.277 5.247 5.247 5.247 4.277 4.277 3 3 3 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 Type List Of Areas $U$141:$DF5210 (ft) Aper 4.6 6.28 6.28 4.34 4.34 4.34 6.28 6.28 4.6 6.28 6.28 4.34 4.34 4.34 6.28 6.28 4.fi 6.28 6.28 4.34 4.34 4.34 6.28 6.28 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 dBd Gain 12.15 13.35 16.05 12.45 14.65 14.65 13.35 16.05 12.15 13.35 16.05 12.45 14.65 14.65 13.35 16.05 12.15 13.35 16.05 12.45 14.65 14,65 13.35 16.05 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 BWdth Pt Dir 68;305 68;310 65;310 72;330 65;310 65;310 68;310 65;330 68;185 68;190 65;190 72;190 65;190 65;190 68;190 65;190 68;65 68;70 65;70 72:70 65;70 65;70 68;70 65;70 63;315 63;190 63;80 63;220 63;220 63;220 63;220 63;120 63;120 Uptime Profile ON flag ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• UNK2 03 UNK2 B4 UNK2 Cl UNK2 C2 UNK2 C3 UNK2 C4 Sym Sym Sym Sym Sym Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 850 25 850 25 S50 25 850 25 S50 25 S50 25 Map Marker Roof X 5 14 45 45 Roof Y Map Label notes for [his table only � 35 AC Uni[ mple tymbols 5 Roof Access 5 AC Unit 20 Ladder 12.52965084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 12.52968084 38 37 36 35 34 33 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 6.997 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 12 12 12 12 12 12 63;120 63;120 63;70 63;70 63;70 63;70 ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ON• ., •. RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 Appendix D USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Roofview O Graphics �'� ��T 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346 1 % of FCC Public Exposure Limit � ❑ Exposure Level >_ 5,000 500 < Exposure Le 100 < Exposure Le Exposure Level <_ ATT Se � AT&T Antennas Other Carrier Antennas � � � � — — � — � . % of FCC Public Exposure Limit �;��: Exposure Level >5 Exposure Level <_ 5 ATT Sector A _ _ _. ___. ........ .. a' 4' Q 8' 18' Note that the areas shown in brown are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because all other carriers' exposures are less than the FCC limits as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for any predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Antennas Okhcr C,�rrier Ant�nnas ti .: •_ RF-EME Compliance Report EBI Project No. 62121908 USID No. 13292 Site No. CNU0530 1070 Broadway, Burlingame, California Appendix E Compliance/Signage Plan �EBI 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346 AT&T Ant�nnas +C�thor Carr`ier A��tennas Sector A �gn (dendtir�uon Lr�end �. Denores AT&T I�aforrmzionai Si�n I •. Cyenvicea AT&T Iraivr�nacianal Sign 2 ""m"=' Denotes AT&q Infprmatlan�l SYgn 3 . Danotes RT&T Imtarmacia�ial Sign 4 � ��- DenatFs AT& T NOTI[ E Siyn '��-� Denotes AT&T CAU�TION $ign � - Denotes ATBT WRRNING Sign � R ■ ;e ,�:,�� ; � �'; �'. �' : d � �; � f�� ,�: � � � €�' Reco �°�_ Hard � � ��. .,.,. �� Sector B 9", ..4�___.p a� _. �� \ � a /'� � . 1070 B roadwa y SCALE 1 : 3,210 200 0 200 400 600 FEET