The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDesign ReviewCITY OF BURLINGAME City Hall — 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010-3997 October 18, 2018 Jaime Rapadas 801 Mahler Road, #106 Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 2108 Clarice Lane Dear Jaime, r�, CtTY � �s� ' � r �, �� , f �,��'';. � � r 4�ovn� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division PH: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the September 24, 2018, Planning Commission approval of your application for Design Review became effective October 4, 2018. This application was for a second story addition to an existing one-story duplex dwelling at 2108 Clarice Lane, zoned R-2. The September 24, 2018 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 13, 2018, sheets A-1 through A-8; 2. that the simulated true divided lites for the new windows shall consist of dimensional muntins on both the interior and exterior surface of the dual glazing with a dividing bar in between the glazing not muntins in between the glass or on the interior only; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; :: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org :: October 18, 2018 2108 Clarice Lane Page 2 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Divisian; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. An extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. :: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org =: � October 18, 2018 2108 Clarice Lane Page 3 The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely, ✓/'� Kevin Gardiner Community Development Oirector c. Richard and Janice Samuelson, property owners 2108 Clarice Lane, Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (LOT 16 BLOCK 9 MILLS ESTATE NO 3 RSM 39/13 14 15); APN: 025-141-160) File :: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org :: Item No. 8c Regular Action Items PROJECT LOCATION 2108 Clarice Lane City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 2108 Clarice Lane Item No. 8c Regular Action Item Meeting Date: September 24, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing duplex dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group Property Owners: Janice and Richard Samuelson General Plan: Medium Density Residential APN: 025-141-160 Lot Area: 8,388 SF Zoning: R-2 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that contains a one-story duplex dwelling with an attached garage and uncovered parking for each respective unit. The applicant is proposing to add a second story to the duplex totaling 1,675 SF. The existing lot coverage is nonconforming since it exceeds the maximum allowed lot coverage by 98 SF. With this project, there is no increase in lot coverage. There is no FAR requirement for the R-2 zone, so the FAR was not calculated for the property. With this application, the number of bedrooms will increase from three to four in Unit A and from two to four in Unit B. Based on the existing bedroom count, a total of four and one-half parking spaces are required (rounded up to five spaces). Based on the proposed bedroom count, a total of five parking spaces are required on-site, so there is no increase in the number of parking spaces required. Three covered parking spaces are provided in the existing garages and two uncovered parking spaces (9' x 20') are provided in the driveway area in front of the garages. The code requires that 80% of the required parking spaces, or in this case four spaces, must be covered. The existing on-site parking is nonconforming with respect to the percentage of required parking that is required to be covered (60% existing). However, since there is no increase in the total number of parking spaces required based on the proposed parking demand, a Variance is not required for this existing nonconforming condition. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing duplex dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 2108 Clarice Lane Lot Area: 8,388 SF Plans date stamped: September 13, 2018 SETBACKS Front (1st flr): , (2nd flr): Side (left): (right): Rear (1st flr): (2nd flr): EXISTING 15'-0" n/a 7'-7" 11'-8" 16'-7" n/a PROPOSED no change 24'-7„ 10'-7" (to 2"d floor) 37'-5" (to 2"d flo0r) no change 16'-7" ALLOWED/REQ'D 15'-0" 15'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Lot Coverage: ; 3,453 SF no change 3,355 SF 41.2%' 40% # of bedrooms: ; Unit A: 3 Unit A: 4 --- Unit B: 2 Unit B: 4 Off-Street Parking: ; 5 total spaces 5 total spaces 3 covered Z 4 covered (9' x 20' each space) no change (g� x 20' each space) 2 uncovered 1 uncovered : (9' x 20') (9' x 20') . Building Height: ; 24'-4" 27'-0" 30'-0" , .................................................................................................................................................... DH Envelope: ; complies complies C.S. 25.27.075 ' Existing nonconforming lot coverage. Z Existing nonconforming percentage of covered parking on-site. Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on August 27, 2018 the Commission had suggestions for the proposed project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all of the required information has been submitted (see attached August 27, 2018, Planning Commission Minutes). The following is a summary of Commission's suggestions with noted changes based on revised plans submitted by the applicant on September 13, 2018: ■ Windows — though the existing windows have grilles in between the glass, simulated true divided lite windows are preferred for the addition or consider proposing no grids at all. The applicant is proposing fo match the existing windows with the grilles in between the g/ass. ln a letter to the Planning Commission (received Sepfember 13, 2018), the homeowners stated that they are open to considering a type of window that is approvable by the Commission. ■ Left Side Elevation — fa�ade is blank and flat, add more detailing like the right side elevation or consider creating more articulation on the second floor. Two dormers have been added to this elevation by bumping out fhe master bathrooms in each unif, increasing the total floor area for the second floor by 25 SF. ■ Hardie Siding —would like a sample of the siding or address of site(s) in Burlingame that have used this siding; clarify if siding will carry through all elevations or if there will be a stucco band in the middle on the side elevations. The applicant has changed their proposal to wood siding instead of Hardie siding. 2 Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring hip roofs, proportional plate heights, wood corbels, and wood siding) is compatible with the existing structure and character of the neighborhood, that no increase in parking demand is consistent with the garage and parking pattern in the neighborhood, and that the architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 13, 2018, sheets A-1 through A-8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which 3 Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group, applicant and architect Janice and Richard Samuelson, property owners Attachments: August 27, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Letter to the Planning Commission from the Property Owner, received September 13, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 14, 2018 Area Map 4 � CITY 0 �� ;�� Q �-� .. ti� ''�,, � 9 o° �Hrownre � City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, August 27, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 2108 Clarice Lane, zoned R-2 - Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-story duplex dwelling (Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group applicant and architect; Janice and Richard Samuelson, property owners) ( 77 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Associate P/anner Kolokihakaufisi provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Kelly opened the public hearing. Jaime Rapadas represented the applicant, with property owner Janice Samuelson. Commission Questions/Comments: > Can the uncovered parking spaces shown in the courtyard space be in tandem with the covered parking in the garage? (Kolokihakaufisi: Yes, this is allowed.) > New vinyl casement windows are proposed to match the existing window material, which is a type of window we typically do not approve or encourage, the muntins are in between the g/ass. Was there any desire or intent to change the character, even if it's just on the addition area and not match the existing windows and get something with more substance? (Rapadas: We are matching the existing windows and using the same grid system.) > Concerned with matching windows with the existing windows that contain grids between-the-g/ass. Encourage doing something more substantive on the addition area. > Houses on Quesada Way sit higher than houses on Marco Polo Way, based on your location not certain if the proposed addition may block views from your neighbor on Quesada Way. Have you shared the plans with your neighbor? (Samuelson: Have not, thought that if the neighbor was concemed they would have submitted a letter or come to the meeting.). > Encourage you to present the plans to your neighbor since the proposed addition is up against their rear property line and is the side that faces the bay. > What is the type of siding proposed for the vertical siding on the second story? (Rapadas: lt will be Hardie board, have used it on other projects when there is an elongated design, he/ps to reduce the bu/k.) > Would be helpful to see samp/e of proposed siding. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Acting Chair Kelly closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Torn about the project, likes that owners are investing in the neighborhood. The massing has charm City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 9/20/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 27, 2018 to it and fits with concept of a duplex, but it lacks the additional charm in terms of detailing. > Existing building has a certain quality and calmness to it because it is relatively simple and has some nice brick highlights which appear fo be in good condition. However, the proposed materials on the addition seem foreign. Vertical paftern of Hardie planks does not harmonize well with the brick. Don't think fhere is a logic that says put brick on the second story, because fhen you're taking brick which is normally at the base of a building and pufting it in a weird location on the facade. > The corbel details, supporting second floor in the courtyard area, invoke a little bit of the existing charm. But the /eft side elevation goes blank, looks like iYs just a layer added on top. It would help if it had some additional charm and depth. Concern is that using the same windows, which appear flat, you don't get any depth or shadows because the muntins are between the g/azing that you normally get with simulated true divided lite windows. So if windows along the back facade a/so have muntins in between glazing, that facade will also appear flat. > Programmafically, the project works well. However, project is missing charm and character that it needs to be successful. > Vertica/ siding is shown throughout on the perspective above the belt course, but the e/evations show the siding seeming to bracket the ends, but disappear in the middle. > Really like the right side elevation, left side elevation is complete/y cold because it so flat. > Don't think muntins befween-the-glass have ever been approved, if fact in recent project suggested that the grids be removed entire/y because it looks cheap. Right side e/evafion does a nice job at not being a wedding cake, the left side elevation not so much, is cold, flat and unfriendly. Need to work through the details more, it's almost there with the right detailing. > Question is whether or not to refer this project to a design review consultant, right on the cusp, not sure which direction to take. > Like the exposed brick, see it on many houses in fhe area and would like to see all the brick elements remain. > Second floor needs more work, but not sure iYs lacking to the point that it needs to be referred to a design review consultant as long the applicant is open to changing the materials and design e/ements on the second floor. > Left elevation is up against a grove of trees and is the /east visible of fhe facades, appreciate thaf there are not a lot of windows overlooking that neighbor on Quesada Way. > Prefer simulated frue divided lite windows, not comfortable approving muntins in between glazing. > Wants applicant to clarify if Hardie siding will be what is shown on the perspective or on the elevations. Have never seen Hardie board applied vertically, concerned that it will look like T-111 siding and whether it fits the level of quality in material we typically see in a project like this. Request that applicant bring in a sample. > Recently approved projects in the neighborhood, like the house across the street, have the /evel of detailing desired and are consistent with the design guidelines. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Commission Discussion: > Encourage applicant to break up second story facade along left side, perhaps bump out some of the bathrooms to add articulation along that facade; might also give some logic to how wood siding could stop and terminate or continue around top course. Aye: 5- Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Terrones, and Tse Absent: 2- Comaroto, and Gaul City of Burlingame paye y Piinied on 9/20/2018 Dear Amelia, Thank you once again for your wonderful help with our proj ect. I apologize that the window change was not noted properly on the updated drawings. We realize after hearing from the Commissioners at our August 27, 2018 meeting, that matching the windows to the existing inside grid style already on the home is not what they' d like to see or approve of for the second story proposed new construction. After driving around t progress in Burlingame, unification and beauty o the construction proj ects in we can see and appreciate of the true divided, simulated, no grid look of the new We give you will be going proj ects under construction. our word this as well with will be the our proj ect. the �� same route we We will install a type of window the planning commission approves of within their approval parameters of new windows installed in Burlingame. We will start to do some research with products available and the related costs. in erely, , . Janice Samuelson 2108 Clarice Lane, Burlingame F�ECEIVE� sE� 1 � Zo�s CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-P+ 1`,t�!NING DIV. .,. - �'ll�� ► BVRLINGAME � �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O'I PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Typ� of application: �� Design Review Variance ❑ Parcel #: �� i �� ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:�� ..L�3i �!� . . i� 11 �,i�ri'�ia� � • • - I_� ��r1 %� � ` � • �� .�..�I\llll � -.- . ��/r' • . � / � � i ►i � • • • � � ► �. .rG„► , �1\' . � • • - �� ■/ :� .'��.. �� . � � • � _�' -ll��J .� - • - i . /� / � _�M�� . �- , � � -� i �r,� �r . , v ► I ��,� ir �. :� �.. - :r �►I :�.�.► �- : f r � _ . . - . � :1 � _��u� � - . - � % � � !I.% /1 /. /I ' / /. ✓ I_� I " .. - /% LI �`- �� JUL -- � 2018 G{i'1' OF BURL'+(`dUP,ME ✓DL'i-�._�^+Ni�i!�IU �E`'.I. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part f e Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such actio . (Initials of Architect/Designer) •-� � - • � ` /I\• �� ' i�' ' � ��\ ��1� ��\'i �� _ii�� AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify und enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. � Applicant's signature: Date: �� V � � � I am aware of the pro ed ap ' and hereby t orize the a ve applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ' � � f � J ` � Property owner's signa _ Date: � @ Date submitted: S: � HANDO UTS� PC Application. doc RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a second story addition to an existinq one-stonr duplex dwellinq at 2108 Clarice Lane, Zoned R-2, Richard and Janice Samuelson, propertv owners, APN: 025-141-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 24, 2018, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th dav of September, 2018, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Effective October 4, 2018 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 13, 2018, sheets A-1 through A-8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of construction plans shall approval adopted by the remain a part of all se Compliance with all con not be modified or chan Council on appeal; a building permit for construction of the project, the project be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall ts of approved plans throughout the construction process. ditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall ged without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Effective October 4, 2018 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME � ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �`in„� , BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '"'g �� ",. PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2108 CLARICE LANE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 nt 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a second story oddition to an existing one-story duplex dwelling at 2108 CLARICE LANE zoned R-2. APN 025-141-160 Mailed: September 14, 2018 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department �t 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � � ��c�, � ��a � a �°�p � pd / 4b�� fJp�� Q� �€� �� (J � �� q� v - v�C�i G� �. 4hd 4� . ti.7U � �� Oub aa �bq p�D, �a _ � �d q� �� tl qbd q C1 � _ `��j� 6G bq ,d� �i �yh y�� ' 6� �y4'^. ' `y`U C�� y b'� U'� � f34u`�� qra ��' �C �q p�� pG � b4 ;a�l`1 i7� �Q , ``', �U U.u� �oV`Q `�h� �r� `'.,. 4 ru �4�a ,. �� t'��D 00�' q v'SCR t�y �� F! D qC; FI� D,,,n. C� �kh �r�'�� yy j G �v U �, � � a ��`� �� t'� �� t7,��dfi+a �� •9�� W %a ��n7 _ �G�J ga � , `� U� d � O �j � ��3 CDD 0 �y�'' V C � (- i/' . � � Cl _. bQ aG � �� O{� ��_ �� u, °� �'�'+F�. �G�Q ��, � r�'� Qc, c, d�'p. �Q �`'��Fi � d: t7� � = D�D� �' Qrl �p`� c� � p D t7,- ��i ��7 �. a• 4tij � �� G .�9� � a� o�� a��a o� p � �� o � �� < �� D� � n O, � p �' ` a�d. �`�� . � �c. � �°an �3 �, o�� c�t�� Q� ��o a�� I� tiG, O F7,C`y d� �t? D�a aG' a � �� :� � �� b .��- W �� G'� ��?�j &�+J� Q �� p '� �' p p � fIG �a �`"��?. �G�'r. D�� ap. �� a a� � c � a d Q�� a� �� Gb � ��d �� D�� b rin 4h D.. QG'D, �3� 77.; � �^ ��4: s� . O 4 O�� a� �G� �?j�� a�� . ��d d� �� J �1 � � � �a � �L�flp �, c�'' - Fiti, FI, �� D� �Ci. E ,.,. "?�,:, - v0 �D„ Dr.;.. �'1.� QO � n� G w i3Qtz� c� cy�" Qa �, a �� 4�' d � � �, � n � c� � ,v. n tI9�Q �qp� aa�� D E �� 7 aD �`�r F�'{' D p 7tjQQ �,9 � �p� �� y�� `��1� E �a�a pU�� oN� ocn� O � n �. r �.�D � o� cc n rn r D Z m Item No. 8c Regular Action Items PROJECT LOCATION 2108 Clarice Lane City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 2108 Clarice Lane Item No. 8c Regular Action Item Meeting Date: September 24, 2018 Request: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing duplex dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group Property Owners: Janice and Richard Samuelson General Plan: Medium Density Residential APN: 025-141-160 Lot Area: 8,388 SF Zoning: R-2 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot that contains a one-story duplex dwelling with an attached garage and uncovered parking for each respective unit. The applicant is proposing to add a second story to the duplex totaling 1,675 SF. The existing lot coverage is nonconforming since it exceeds the maximum allowed lot coverage by 98 SF. With this project, there is no increase in lot coverage. There is no FAR requirement for the R-2 zone, so the FAR was not calculated for the property. With this application, the number of bedrooms will increase from three to four in Unit A and fro t�wo to four in Unit B. Based on the existing bedroom count, a total of four and one-half parking spaces�are req�re� (rounded up to five spaces). Based on the proposed bedroom count, a total of five parking spaces are required on-site, so there is no increase in the number of parking spaces required. Three covered parking spaces are provided in the existing garages and two uncovered parking spaces (9' x 20') are provided in the driveway area in front of the garages. The code requires that 80% of the required parking spaces, or in this case four spaces, must be covered. The existing on-site parking is nonconforming with respect to the percentage of required parking that is required to be covered (60% existing). However, since there is no increase in the total number of parking spaces required based on the proposed parking demand, a Variance is not required for this existing nonconforming condition. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a second story addition to an existing duplex dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 2108 Clarice Lane Lot Area: 8,388 SF Plans date stamped: September 13, 2018 SETBACKS Front (1st flr): , (2nd flr): Side (left): (right): Rear (1sf flr): (2nd flr): EXISTING _........... ._.... 15'-0" n/a _._ .............. 7'-7„ 11'-8" 16'-7" n/a PROPOSED no change 24'-7" 10'-7" (to 2"d floor) 37'-5" (to 2�d fl0or) no change 16'-7" ALLOWED/REQ'D 15'-0" 15'-0" _......._ ........................_..........._.._...... ....... 7'-0" 7'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane � EXISTING ' PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Lot Coverage: ' 3,453 SF no change 3,355 SF 41.2%' 40% ..............................._..................................................................................................._............,...._......_...._.............._.._....._.................._....__......._._....._............... _... _...---.......... # of bedrooms: ; Unit A: 3 Unit A: 4 --- Unit B: 2 Unit B: 4 Otf-Street Parking: ; 5 total spaces 5 total spaces 3 covered 2 4 covered ;(9' x 20' each space) ' no change (g' x 20' each space) 2 uncovered 1 uncovered ; (9' x 20') (9' x 20') : ..........................................................................................................................._;........................................................................................................................................................:............................................................................. ... , _ .... ............................................................. Building Height: ; 24'-4" 27'-0" 30'-0" _ _ .......................:.... ..................................................................................................................... _:............................... , , t _ ......... ..............................._................................................................................................................. DH Envelope: : compiies complies C.S. 25.27.075 • cx�st�ng nonconTorming iot coverage. Z Existing nonconforming percentage of covered parking on-site. Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on August 27, 2018 the Commission had suggestions for the proposed project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all of the required information has been submitted (see attached August 27, 2018, Planning Commission Minutes). The following is a summary of Commission's suggestions with noted ch�nges based on revised plans submitted by the applicant on September 13, 201$ �� r �,+� , f_, �. � •4� � " � �--� �- �";; `.�; /�t /_ _ _. ` . � 5 � t � � .t ; 4 � " �_r. �` . '. '4 ; "?�. � /,. .r.,' �1 ■ Windows — though the existing windows h�ve grilles in between the glass, simulated true divided lite windows are preferred for the addition or consider proposing no grids at all. The applicant is proposing to match the existing windows with the grilles in between the g/ass. ln a letter to the Planning Commission (received September 13, 2018), the homeowners stated that they are open to considering a type of window that is approvable by the Commission. ■ Left Side Elevation — fa�ade is blank and flat, add more detailing like the right side elevation or consider creating more articulation on the second floor. Two dormers have been added to this elevation by bumping out the masfer bathrooms in each unit, increasing the total floor area for the second floor by 25 SF. ■ Hardie Siding —would like a sample of the siding or address of site(s) in Burlingame that have used this siding; clarify if siding will carry through all elevations or if there will be a stucco band in the middle on the side elevations. The applicant has changed their proposal to wood siding instead of Hardie siding. 2 Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring hip roofs, proportional plate heights, wood corbels, and wood siding) is compatible with the existing structure and character of the neighborhood, that no increase in parking demand is consistent with the garage and parking pattern in the neighborhood, and that the architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific firidings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: �Z 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 13, 2018, sheets A-1 through A-8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Pfanning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which 3 Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group, applicant and architect Janice and Richard Samuelson, property owners Attachments: August 27, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Letter to the Planning Commission from the Property Owner, received September 13, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 14, 2018 Area Map � � CfTY ,�'T ': �;,.: : . O,� �`-_, �� '.� r -�_� . ,�.�{�� j j�� o�.,. _ 90 '>no City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, August 27, 2018 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 2108 Clarice Lane, zoned R-2 - Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single-story duplex dwelling (Jaime Rapadas, AR Design Group applicant and architect; Janice and Richard Samuelson, property owners) ( 77 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Associate Planner Kolokihakaufisi provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Kelly opened the public hearing. Jaime Rapadas represented the applicant, with property owner Janice Samuelson. Commission Questions/Comments: > Can the uncovered parking spaces shown in the courtyard space be in tandem with the covered parking in the garage? (Kolokihakaufisi: Yes, this is allowed.) > New vinyl casemenf windows a�e proposed to match the existing window material, which is a type of window we fypically do not approve or encourage, the muniins are in between the glass. Was there any desire or intent to change the character, even if iYs just on the addition area and not match the existing windows and get something with more substance? (Rapadas: We are matching the existing windows and using the same grid system.) > Concerned with matching windows with the existing windows that contain grids befween-the-glass. Encourage doing something more substantive on the addition area. > Houses on Quesada Way sit hrgher than houses on Marco Polo Way, based on your location not certain if the proposed addition may block views from your neighbor on Quesada Way. Have you shared the plans with your neighbor7 (Samuelson: Have not, thought that if the neighbor was concerned they would have submitted a letter or come to ihe meeting.). > Encourage you to present the plans to your neighbor since the proposed addition is up against their rear property line and is the side that faces the bay. > What is the type of siding proposed for the vertical siding on the second story? (Rapadas: lt will be Hardie board, have used it on other projects when there is an elongated design, helps to reduce the bulk.) > Would be helpful to see sample of proposed siding. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Acting Chair Kelly closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Torn about the project, likes that owners are investing in the neighborhood. The massing has charm City of Burlingame paye � Printed on 9/20/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 27, 2018 to it and fifs with concept of a duplex, but it lacks the additional cha�m in terms of detailing. > Existing building has a certain quality and calmness to it because it is relatively simple and has some nice brick highlights which appear to be in good condition. However, the proposed materials on the addition seem foreign. Vertical pattern of Hardie planks does not harmonize well with the brick. Don't think there is a logic that says put brick on the second story, because then you're taking brick which is normally at the base of a building and putting it in a weird location on the facade. > The corbel details, supporting second floor in the courtyard area, invoke a little bit of the existing charm. But the left side elevafion goes blank, looks like rYs just a layer added on top. It would help if it had some additional charm and depth. Concern is that using the same windows, which appear flat, you don't get any depth or shadows because the muntins are between the glazing that you normally get with simulated true divided lite windows. So if windows along the back facade also have muntins in between glazing, that facade will also appear flat. > Programmatically, the project works well. However, project is missing charm and character that it needs to be successful. > Vertical siding is shown throughouf on the perspective above the belt course, but the elevations show the siding seeming to bracket the ends, but disappear in the middle. > Really like the right side elevation, left side elevation is completely cold because it so flat. > Don't think muntins between-the-glass have ever been approved, if fact in recent project suggested that the grids be removed entirely because it looks cheap. Right side elevation does a nice job at not being a wedding cake, the left side elevation nof so much, is cold, flat and unfriendly. Need to work through the details more, iYs almost there wiih the right detailing. > Question is whether or not to refer this project to a design review consultant, right on the cusp, not sure which direction to take. > Like the exposed brick, see it on many houses in the area and would like to see al! the brick elements remain. > Second floor needs more work, but not sure rYs lacking to the point that it needs to be referred to a design review consultant as long the applicant is open to changing the materials and design elements on the second floo�. > Left elevation is up against a grove of trees and is the least visible of the facades, appreciate that there are not a lot of windows overlooking that neighbor on Quesada Way. > Prefer simulated true divided lite windows, not comfortable approving muntins in befween glazing. > Wants applicant to clarify if Hardie siding will be what is shown on the perspective or on the elevations. Have never seen Hardie boa�d applied vertically, concerned that it will look like T-111 siding and whether it fits the level of quality in material we typically see in a p�oject like this. Request that applicant bring in a sample. > Recently approved projects in the neighborhood, like the house across fhe street, have the level of detailing desired and are consistent with the design guidelines. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Commission Discussion: > Encourage applicant to break up second story facade along left side, perhaps bump out some of the bathrooms to add articulation along that facade; might also give some logic to how wood siding could stop and terminate or continue around top course. Aye: 5- Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Terrones, and Tse Absent: 2- Comaroto, and Gaul City o/ Burlinqame Page 2 Printed on 9/20/2018 Dear Amelia, Thank you once again for your wonderful help with our proj ect. I apologize that the window change was not noted properly on the updated drawings. We realize after hearing from the Commissioners at our August 27, 2018 meeting, that matching the windows to the existing inside grid style already on the home is not what they' d like to see or approve of for the second story proposed new construction. After driving around t progress in Burlingame, unification and beauty o the construction proj ects in we can see and appreciate of the true divided simulated no grid look of the new We give you will be going > > proj ects under construction. our word this as well with will be the our proj ect. the or same route we We will install a type of window the planning commission approves of within their approval parameters of new windows installed in Burlingame. We will start to do some research with products available and the related costs. , in erely, , . Janice Samuelson 2108 Clarice Lane, Burlingame ��C�� SEP I 3 2Q18 CITY OF BURLIPdaAME CDD-P��t�!NING DtV. �nr� �� BURLINGAME . ` -^,� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Typ of application: �- �r + Design Review Variance ❑ Parcel #: (^`�� i�T( f�� ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: ' • • � � ' � 1 � �i' �t� ... . i� ►l �,i�r:.if� • • • - I� ��r/ i� � � � � �' �� . �J\l1� L � -.- . r�/I�' ♦ - ///- � i►� � . , � i � � :��'�� i �. : � .. - : r ,►I :�.�.► �- : � r , • i :c � ��u� � - . - , I �' r.! /.1 L / ' / /. ,s I_� 'I � : .. - - - �i v ..�. . • � � . � .fi�� i�\ . � •• - �� / .� :. �� I�L � � � � - • �� _�' �ri�1 � -•- • ./l� /� _/1111_�' �1� -� i�l��i1 �� JUL - � 2018 ClTY OF 3URLif`lGAME co�-��r��vc r�►��. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part f the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such actio . (Initials of ArchitectlDesigner) - • � � ''� /I\ � � � �� i►' � !t► ��17�� \ i �� r _�� AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify und enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. \ Applicant's signature: Date: ��J V � � � I am aware of the proqe Commission. ( Property owner's and hereby��thorize the a�pve applicant to submit this application to the Planning Date: �""'`-'1 � ( 2—J � � � Date submitted: S: � HANDO UTS� PC Application. doc RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desi n Review for a second story addition to an existinq one-story duplex dwellina at 2108 Clarice Lane. Zoned R-2, Richard and Janice Samuelson propertv owners APN� 025-141-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 24, 2018, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson �, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th dav of September, 2018 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Effective October 4, 2018 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 13, 2018, sheets A-1 through A-8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 2108 Clarice Lane Effective October 4, 2018 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME � ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUR�INGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��, —, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '�'�" ` PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2108 CLARICE LANE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing one-story duplex dwelling at 2108 CLARICE LANE zaned R-2. APN 025-141-160 Mailed: September 14, 2018 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARIIVG NOTICE Citv of Burlinqame A copy of the appiication and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please cail (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC FfEARING NOTICE (Plea;e r2fer to other sideJ 0 2108 CLARICE LANE 025.141.160 300' noticing _-,�� Qt3 � � q"� � a`� C� 4 ``� w 41� �� ,1a p�� p�CO Q� Cl�G s� M^ ^ pq W �p 4 s]• �� ,,�c�' � � L� � `�'.; . c� �C r,ia r� 4� ap � z�fJ �� D� pe ��q �i t; t c,� p0 �� . . ,. .� p� p �4 � a� y7Q Q �a ,�Gj � ' ra q4� C, 4�g 4� _�4� p ��'v o p �' oL�, w Qf�� _ �� O qq� Aq4 p�� , p q�° �, a�C, U4 ; l7 9F)4 r, �� Qa a� , a�Q r�`�`';q Qq�� '�D � � fl �� p ' �, wa� �]C' �4 q�� 4 p A: ��,�`7r _'. y v�,�, & c`�' ' p,,�� a� 4�c� p� �.,; QO c� 4`J 4� �� ta� ;. Q h` ; 4Q �� qJ pq A� r�y47 q�� 'a ' 4' ,-� Frp,, p c�C� �q af7 ,�t[> � •` �� Q� ; ��4:, � cw �� `�O w� t,a rn`'�' � a� � W ' O f% p4` pi7 �� ?, � O '�� r `�'qr . q4b � a ,�,;, p ;� p p ,a �4� c� `''a `4b c� , `�tT ::. GG ':;; w� hU �� q paG'� D�� ' Oc� c�?� � �� q ,;, , w`^�' Q"w Qb�'' t� ;� " �b . �`�' �y J C; Q4'� p - aDQ : �� U� . 4'� �1� q � �Gh � q qa U"' fl � �r `� Q p � � � n^� a h� ��tJ' ��Qr �p C: p� ''� p L'� p N^J p� Q� p �� D� pdV o 9q ad f7� �s tJ t Vh ta� rti j� �� D..: � W ��`� 410 CW :,�.y�`C- !� ` abc� a� Q � �° Q°� �� A�� `7 � p�a 4,47 ' t�� 43G �� q ; g � Q ^�'q., � � � aa�� p�� p�D� �� Q q��0 ta a� �� ` l, ��1I w.L 1� � l�:�' Q Q� �� a p �� ,, 4C� �, � q c �� O r�` �nj� ,w W rq� ��Q� q�S14 v� p,�,'J 5h � n . �� 6 �y ' �' �, � �0�� VI�Q 93GG �C O r5�rt � �!p � �'%p �a� qq � ,� . ��p qpG� �p a�d� �`�o� � s�� Q� 4� � 9 C� c1 �c�� d d � q � ��. G � ��Q �� D`� f�� 9 q'�C' �, �iflGi� Y340�� o- F Q d . � o �� d� � o �t � 46��' �� .�t'' '�h � � �Q�� D ��4� �q p }- 3�n� n,� d � t� � � � ��} ii � �(��i Cj �C439 `� � ��" �;i,ti ; , ' p _.. G`? cn h � � CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) �� /l��/;G.L�,J ��2n/E� , being duly sworn, deposes and says: �� That she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18-years, thal acting for the City of Burlingame on the 17th da�of August 2018 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. 2108 Clarice Lane 77 — 300' Notices S:\NOTICINGWFFIDAVIT.doc . CITY OF BURLINGAME ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD c J'�BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2108 CLARICE LANE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review and Variance for a second story addition to an existing single-story duplex at 2108 CLARICE LANE zoned R-2. APN 025-141-160 Mailed: AUGUST 17, 2018 (Please reier to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlin,c�ame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) . CITY OF BURLINGAME � � " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 1�om f BURLINGAME, CA 94010 9�� '' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2108 CLARICE LANE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a second story addition to an existing one-story duplex dwelling at 2108 CLARICE LANE zoned R-2. APN 025-141-160 Mailed: September 14, 2018 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) ,_ � pc noticing 2108 clarice In APN PROPERTY OWNER 25193040 Li Leping Tr Strohmeier Gordon A& L A 25141110 Trs 25143050 Martinovich Bozo A Tr 25193030 Hee Michael Tr 25141200 Diodati Giovacchino Tr 25141130 Gibbs Virginia Tr 25141150 Gm & Sons Investors Llc 25141210 Orozco Yvonne M N/a 25143040 Ombao Erwin Z 25142120 Pang Tom Y Tr 25141220 Ehsanipour Keihan Tr 25141160 Samuelson Janice Devincenzi 25143020 Dyson Kent G& Linda A Trs 25142100 Mitchell Claire J Tr 25193050 ZhangJohn 25141100 Gallagher David F Tr 25142080 Clifford John E Et AI 25191090 Chu Chi Hung 25141170 Seto May Tr 25143010 Marcus Irwin L& Sonia B Trs 25142110 Vernarecci Allan & Carol 25143060 Kakis Anthony & Lella Trs 25193060 Striebing Lisa Tr 25193010 Karan Lori D INfO ADDRESS ZhangQinglingTr 3616 Oak Knoll Dr 3440 Hidden Valley Ln Martinovich MarijaTr 2015 Clarice Ln Hee lune Tr 2104 D2VI5 Dr Diodati Elena D Tr 1730 Quesada Way 1721 Sequoia Ave 2345 3rd Street Snyder William E N/a 16326 Quesada Wy OmbaoJanet 2103 Clarice Ln Pang Marie LTr 999 Larkspur Dr Ehsanipour Fereshteh Tr 848 Newhall Road 917 Howard Ave Yang Yong-qung Gallagher Nancy C Tr Demartiniclifford Patricia Ann Chu Lai Yung Seto May Trust DefFterios George & Leesa Striebing Trust 2109 Clarice Ln 540 Remillard Drive 2016 Davis Dr 1675 Escalante Way 314 Miramonte PI 2208 Davis Dr 1716 Quesada Way 1712 Quesada Way 1508 Parkwood Dr 2009 Clarice Ln 2012 Davis Dr 1700 Quesada Way Azzollini Sergio & 25191100 Azzollini Sergio & Angela Trs AngelaTrust 2204 Davis Dr Flanagan Paul W & Jean 25141140 Flanagan Jean M Tr MTrust 3126 Margarita Ave 25191110 Chang Albert Tr Thein Jocelyn Co Tr 1701 Quesada Way 25193070 Wang Hongjun YangShuang 2008 Davis Dr 25130060 Burlingame Elem Sch Dist 1825 Trousdale Dr 25141180 Sim Derek Du Xiaoyan 1722 Quesada Wy 25142090 Ackerludith S Tr AckerTrust 50 Mounds Rd #504 Ahl Family Limited 25142070 Partnership 859 Jefferson Ct Apt A 25141120 Mohamed Amr F Tr 1022 Rudder Ln 25142140 Merrick Kathryn H Tr Rehberg RobertTr 311 S Ellsworth Ave 25141190 Grady Marjorie G Tr Grady Marjorie G Tr 1726 Quesada Way 25143030 Dowling Patricia 2105 Clarice Ln mtg date: 08.27.18 38 property owners - 025.141.160 CITY STATE ZIP Emerald Hills CA 94062 Fairfield CA Burlingame CA Burlingame CA Burlingame CA Burlingame CA San Francisco CA Granada Hills CA Burlingame CA Millbrae CA Burlingame CA Burlingame CA Burlingame Hillsborough Burlingame CA CA CA Burlingame Santa Rosa Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Mateo Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame San Mateo San Mateo Foster City San Mateo Burlingame Burlingame 94533-9740 94010-5402 94010-5409 94010-5756 94010 94107 91344 94010-5404 94030-1524 94010-5756 94010 94010-5404 94010 94010-5407 CA 94010-5436 CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 95409 94010-5411 94010-5756 94010-5702 94403 94010-5402 94010-5407 94010-5702 94010 94010-5947 94010-5701 94010 94010-5704 94010 94402 94401-2278 94404-2850 94401 94010-5756 94010-5404 1/2 pc noticing� 2108 clarice In 25193020 Chen Cindy Chaurong Tr 25142130 Petrucci James L Tr Chen Cindy Chaurong Trust Petrucci Deborah A Tr 2108 Davis Dr 1357 Cabrillo Avenue 2/2 mtg date: 08.27.18 38 property owners - 025.141.160 Burlingame CA Burlingame CA 94010-5409 94010 pc noticing 2108 clarice In APN OCCUPANT ADDRESS 25193040 Occupant 2100 Davis Dr 25141110 Occupant 1727 Sequoia Ave 25143050 Occupant 2015 Clarice Ln 25193030 Occupant 2104 Davis Dr 25141200 Occupant 1730 Quesada Way 25141130 Occupant 1719 Sequoia Ave 25141150 Occupant 1701 Sequoia Ave 25141210 Occupant 1734 Quesada Way 25143040 Occupant 2103 Clarice Ln 25142120 Occupant 1722 Sequoia Ave 25141220 Occupant 1738 Quesada Way 25141160 Occupant 2108 Clarice Ln 25143020 Occupant 2109 Clarice Ln 25142100 Occupant 1702 Sequoia Ave 25193050 Occupant 2016 Davis Dr 25141100 Occupant 1731 Sequoia Ave 25142080 Occupant 1721 Marco Polo Way 25191090 Occupant 2208 Davis Dr 25141170 Occupant 1716 Quesada Way 25143010 Occupant 1712 Quesada Way 25142110 Occupant 1718 Sequoia Ave 25143060 Occupant 2009 Clarice Ln 25193060 Occupant 2012 Davis Dr 25193010 Occupant 1700 Quesada Way 25191100 Occupant 2204 Davis Dr 25141140 Occupant 1715 Sequoia Ave 25191110 Occupant 1701 Quesada Way 25193070 Occupant 2008 Davis Dr 25130060 Occupant 1715 Quesada Way 25141180 Occupant 1722 Quesada Way 25142090 Occupant 2012 Clarice Ln 25142070 Occupant 1727 Marco Polo Way 25141120 Occupant 1723 Sequoia Ave 25142140 Occupant 1730 Sequoia Ave 25141190 Occupant 1726 Quesada Way 25143030 Occupant 2105 Clarice Ln 25193020 Occupant 2108 Davis Dr 25142130 Occupant 1726 Sequoia Ave City of Burlingarr 501 Primrose Rd CITY Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame Burlingame STATE ZIP CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 mtg date 09.24.18 39 occupants - 025.141.160 2108 CLARICE LANE 025.141.160 300' noticing � - , ' .�'*. , �, � ♦ ,�� i' _ � t � ,' � ' % 2, � �� r - � � > � �t' / , � � -.� � �" �t � � � ��. i �, T� ,; /� � � ; T. ' ! , ,:, � � j ��-C �7V ' l � � % i� � � I � ' �'. �.� /�� / ��,�� , >, j � �. ,! � ; / �. � f � � 1 / `, % i %� '' j _ / , � ,r•, r" ' _ ; �� ` � � .� •� ;. � . r - ,i' �`�� •� , ,; ;'•� ,`�� i ,i ;i •'i i ,i � i , .� i ��►��_ ,, �,.kqa /�� 1 2108 CLARICE LANE 025.141.160 300' noticing ; �p�3 ��'L+ l� L-` q� , � �� b Q 0 � �6410 f3��p � i7 Q� p� �� Q�. n q � �Q a��.1 " �c a e� � q� �O �� qq �C. p� �J aa ao �q �a � �� ca . �� t�lQ �(� �,a � FI� qJ Ci `� �� q �Gp L� 4�]�r,� flo � :� n� Ac �q 4 po ... bs> flQ�C q`'�' 6� , p`a ��- . pc?,, fay� p'� 4h' � L� p �� Q� 4� a� '�9�� qc� ,�, �� a p� � �� IIE / �� , q� a �Q � � o � Q �� d d�� a��,a� Q p� p Q��. q� p q,�� • L%� �, �Cl�� 4J �q q ��7 5 � �:�, G� Q� � p� �� c� �� h` ��" Gi� `"7 Q� c Da�� °�'� � �� p° �o� q''� �yQ a � c , �a �� '�J� D�.*� �',� j G� A q�+ Qy`I � p�� `��,o.� �'� � yy� � p� c5° ��'� Q� 3 � a;� f� q �� ;a �a�' t�`� � 4 f%J �jj�� Q G pC � p �3 Q p 0 r y`y � ;� ft�j �t%r,� p0` � p ��c�` � l..l� �d �j S? vh ya yy� �d �� D ta G`� C7 � D° � ��`' ,� 0 4 a`„a p `�� a�° a�� . qQ a p�q Q9� a��y �a� �, p�-y p A Q c� a�aD � ��. ��y3 b 1 p qti�Q � ng �Q ,' �, _ G��C3�,_ Q ��i� �Cv� � � ��j p p� - p y� '� �W � qCh C�� O C�p qU� C� �� AQ Q q� � �� O �yb a&j �a Q'.•] � q�q ��/ ;��' a`� 3 ca � 4�� q �O �� c,y �p 4' 93pG c�C a� CQ �� Qq ' �+ �a 9�,G� �Q ��Q r7�o� � �� ' �3' � 9 �S�Ja �c7�. ��E! ��D`� f�Q � �9 � q3C'Q Q�� 4C �3f3C��:} Y34U�� i Y�� J �� t! � � Q6��' (r�� G` �Q c� � �� D a�a p p� - � 0 3��'� a ta ��y� GC� �;,,, ,,.. � A _� � � � � � CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) /�� . �-L �iL !Zl�1 L , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18-years, that acting for the City of Burlingame on the 14t" dav of September 2018 deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto. � 2108 Clarice Lane 77 — 300' Notices S:\NOTICINGWFFIDAVIT.doc I �� - �� - _:�_ :� � �:s __ _____ � �_ � � fV � %.^ �'I� � 10'�''/- 59'-6� 50��9• 11 �-8• 3�-6' 47'-1' ��- - - 9�- , Y I 4 r m :c ��-1� � � �I. � �I . I m I 1 I I ( � � I � 1 � `v � < i ■� u� " � �:.; i i _ c�v' 1 _ I '� j 5'-r 20'-, • � � � ` 9' X 20' PARKING SPACE - �-----_� tt�. s�ucM . o � N 2s'-o" I M ^ � �� I N 9' X N)' PARKING SPACE I I � ---=-----� � 0 N 1705 QUESADA WAY oomer CLARICE LANE 0 , - :� ,:,a. I � � � �11� i's= *,'— � � � -- LL � � N � _� �s:: �w: w.—' o '9�,6 � �� - _ 2 - , -- -___ DRAWING INDEX: °' � 1 M1 (N) ROOF AND SITE PLAN. "��4`�� $�Wq�J( VICINRY AN� LOCATION MAPS; PROJECT DATA; PERSPECTIVE 7p LAN0.SCAPINGLEGEND. �20�-Y 5'-10.' EL88.76� 22�-5� A•2 (Ej FIRST FLOOR PLAN �� . 7-7� 48�-10� A� (N) FIRST FLOOR PLAN - 70'-0� a� (N)SECONDFLOORPIAN � (N) ROOF and SITE PLAN , A-5 (E� ELEVATION _, �E ��, _ �,-0 � A� (N) FRONT ELEVATIION ; (N) LEFf SIDE ELEVATION A-7 (N) RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION; �/ 0' S' 1D' 20' (N) REAR ELEVATION � AA (N) BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" � � � �b- ., O' � :�' 0`�' 13'-9" �. CLAftICE LN. 2105 SEQWIA AVE.-- crnr�er CLARICE LANE LANDSCAPING LEGEND: �4 (7) BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS AM. BOXWOOD 5 GAL O (1) (E) 8' MAGNOLIA CITY TREE TO REMAIN �3 (2} JAPANESE MAPL.E ACER PASLhfATUM 15 GAL. 1� O4 (2) ABUTILON HYBRIDUM RED FLOWER MAPLf 15 GAL. � � �:Y � "�� ; "'� : � ; ?: % iiii%��i��l� i � � 'v 2 LOCATION MAP Lp � NTS '� .. Q... � , � � �� Q ��"�C� ? I� ". � � � �; � �i� � a �, . `� � r. � . Q � q Q �r, : ��. v� � _ Q. � g , iV I.. �e ,�1 rZS , � �• � QQ �1 r � �- . �k) � � w,��_ . f� � f � C� � a fJ � a i p o t � Q c�� -� ., :� � . � �T�i � � '� � � a � o �+ � p � � j �� Q B � C� O �, I � � �� THE LOYT - �' ��" O � 3� VICiNITY MAP Nrs � G _ - � . + 7., -- ,�'1f.,+, � i� / - �ECEIV�D Sf P l 3 2018 CITY OF BURLtt�iGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. ` ` 4 PERSPECTIVE � PROJECT DATA Q LOT SIZE g,3gg,pp � ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE @ 4094 3�355.00 (E) LOT COVERAGE ' 3,453.00 (� 2108 FIRST FLR- HABITABLE 1,321.00 SF (N) 2108 2"� FLR- HA8ITASLE 865.00 (E) 2 CAR GARAGE 474.00 (E) ENTRY PORCH g7g_pp (E) SERVICE STAIRS 3p.pp (E) 2106 FIRST FLR- HABITABLE' 1,150,00 SF (N) 2106 2� FLR HABITABLE 7�.00 (E) OtdE-CAR GARAGE 300.00 (� ENTRY PORCH 3g,pp (E� SERVICE STAIRS 3p,pp TOTAL GROSS HABRABLE • 41,,,�, 51.00 SF APN . 025141160 20NE . R-2 CADES . DEVELOPMENT STDS. OF TFIE GTY OF BURLINGAME; 2016 CALIFORNIA BIRLDING CODE; CAL�ORNIA PLUMBING CADE; INCLUDING ALL AF�NDAENTS AS ADOPTED M ORDINANCE 1889; 2p16 CALIFORNIA f�SIDENTIAL CODE INq.I�ING NdENDMENT: Where fhe property Iine's leas tlia� Ten (10) Feet from the e�dt � d any newly instaled or replaced high el6dea.7 med�l equiPrt�ent, the pfpe size of ttie M1�al Ten (10) Feet d any EenNnal must be mcreased by ihree (3) kkJ�es a, as an alOen�ive, R12IIUf2dUf@f f12fflB9 RIUB� bB IIIStBaBd. ' . 'C.WisUuCtbn ibuls' Week�ys: 8:00 am. - 7�0 p.m $�IlR�8j�3: 9:i�0 8J11. - s:i�� $UIi�jS Nld f�0�f�y6: NO N/Of�( ASfIW6d : SHEET NOTES: p �. THIS PRO.�CT RE�lIRES NON-COMIPLIANT PLUA�ING FIXTURES TO BE RE- REPLACED BY WATER-CONSERVlNG PWNBING fUQURES PER SB 40T (2009) 2. ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO � DONE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDING PERMR ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS, INCLUDING REVIEVM BY TF� PUWNMIG CAMMISSION. 3. AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTHuI IS A REQUIREMENT AND SHALL BE APPLIED FOR UNDER A DEFERRED SUBhtlTTAL. 4. A GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE OBfAINW fROM T}iE - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 5. LANDSCAPE WILL BE REHABILRATED. �v�sw�s P@t12JILY'11Plll vErt nwc oEswx � � � �� w � � Q J � Ug� � ~ W • � U m C�� t � � � �� . � � � fr - _ �sl � aK'Y � g �' el « g��y�o�� s�� s � � � �� g�� :Z O Z f- v O J la � � � z v� 'o � � I 0 m v � J � � U W :Z 'U q Z '� o ' r � �Q a � s�o� 2 � �$��wa � Z�� >��a � DATE: .62M112018 SGU.E: AS SHOYVN . DRAWN BY: RW . .IOB NO.: 15.9212 . SHffT NOs . A-1 . SHEET LEI iO (E) GUARD AND HAND RAIL O2 (E) HAND RAIL O3 (E) THREE�STEP STAIR • 0' 5' 10' 20' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" U -/' I REVISIONS BY venuur�anx �roapens �� • � � W � fQ � Z � W �K � U � � W � H�� _ U O �a � a&� �� ma �� P� �S ' ,� 4 6 pe' � S U � 4 i3 � d��b� � ¢� Y ��g�� • � �� e�� o� ��g�� s��e��n z O Z � � � Q W J Q a � z O � �O o', � Z U J � � W " °6 Z U U O g Z w m ' � � N a � W d J � J a � 0 O J LL H i/i � � L1. U v W y DATE 02N212018 SCALE: 11S S110WN DRAWN BY: RW ,108 NO.: 15.1212 SHEET NO.: A-2 I:!-Iv -li tl -v IL-G I I-o �L-�U I � � � � � � � � � � � I � � � � � � � � � � (E) FIRST FLOOR PLAN � . SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0" . � C i� N 0 o i i � � � i � KITCHEN i � I I � i e2 � I Q� � I I I 6.? � KfTCHEN � 7 � � � � � � C,� f� ; � � I ; � � ; ; �� ; � � { ' I ; ; ' DRNEYlAY/ ' ; ; � ; � � i OPEN ARFA i � ; I � � � � � LMNG RY. i i i i i � i , ; � � i i i i � i i i . � � i ; �' �' I I � � LMNG RM. � i i o i i � � � � � � � DINING RM. � °D I I ' ' O . . _ , . i � , . i � � � � � ' ' . � � �� J----------------�. i , , i ,� DININ6 RM. -------- \ �-------- `. � i i % , ' � � � � � � � � , i F.P. ' � � , , � ' , � , , � ' � I ' � � - - - -i-- - - -� - - -f. . - - - - - - � - � I - - _ - � ` � � I 1 I / � � ^ I i �� I I 1 I � �� e-- _____-_-_- ________________________________ __�I I I I � � . - - - �.�. - - 51�_9• , , 38'�8' 15'-10' I I 14'-11' � 21'-0' � 17-2' � 11'-8" � 12'-10' I � , � � � � A- A- I I � I � I I --- � � i�- --------------------- �------�-----------------------�----------------- ---------�--------- -------------�-----------------------�---------- �-------------- - }-- -------------- --r � `, DN. ' ' DN. ' � �--- ' ' � - - - i � , � i �. , , ^ � �. � � � : � i U � � r----------- -- -, r----------- ------t : � i I I � � \ � � � --- --------� ----------�----------------- ------- ------'-------------- ------� �--------- �------ - - - - i��--------------- ---� i i i i i I I i i � � i i i � i � MI�STER BDRN. 1 BEDR00�1 2 I I BEDROOA� 2 BEDROOM 1 � o i ' ' � I � i I i i i I I i � i � i � � I I ' i ' � ' GARAGE ' GARNGE � i ; ' ====a DN. I � I � ; I � � I /� O � N �` I i �� ,: (N) HALLWAY I 18'-0" CLEAR ; I ; , �I {1P � I I � ' (N) Wood ��rAIK � i ' i WI Wu7 �+P�D?tW. DN. i � DN.i � - i 1-��N i-r i-r=l I I � i i i i i i i� i i i i i ' ' _ i i i� i i i � i i i i i I I O i i � i�i i i i i i i i � 4 , i 'o' i i � i- i i i i i i i i � i � i i i n i� i i i� i � � i i i i i i � - -- - i - - — � rn � i EN`Ri( PORCH � � � � 1 M i ; .. , �? �Nff A ' ---- � L_ �_ 1_ � � i i N i L_ __________ i __________ _____'__ ------ --------------- ---- �- - - i r-------- i � � i i � i i � ' � i ' i i � ' � ( I i � i � i ; ; � i i i i �P PORCH ; i � � "' � UNIT B ; I i , , � � � � i � � � � ' I - - _ _ SOLID WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACE 5'-8" A � e � 8 �` // 1 SH EET LEGEND. TO MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS AS A \� OU.S.EPA PHASE 11 CERT�FIED WOOD- A- -7 A- 1 (E) GUARD AND HAND RAIL BURNING DEVICE, lYP AT 2 PIACES O2 (E7 HAND RAIL 24'-10' 39�_�... --- ��• �(� THREE-STEP STAIR <� (t� HAND RAIL T0 2� FLR. OS (N) HAND RAIL DN. T015T FLR. , 6O (N) BRICK FINISH, TYP, o• 5 � o' zo' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" � (N) FIRST FLOOR PLAN �� SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' 0 � � (N) SECOND FLOOR PLAN � — SCALE: 2 1/4'=1�-0° o' s' i o' 20' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" REVISIONS BY roeu�uur��xx � xEre�aorExrs vea n�uc oeswM aEv�w caeExrs m� � d� �� ui � � W j � a' m � � U � W � H ' = W Dao� � � �m xm �� $� 4y �p,5 � P `�� H�vr 5cP C �2��me�R �€hg� � �� >g�� _ �� s�� z O : Z � U v�j Q W J � 7 4 c� � Z � O � � O m U � ? � ob Z U U O g z W U � � � N � � � a � � � a � S J LL � Z � U z z N � Z � � x DATE: 02l,2lZO,S SGLLE: AS SFIOWN DRANM BY: ' RW JOB NO.: 15.1212 sH�r No� —/'�"T RENSIONS TOP(�RIDGE Q neitu.esr•t�r EL103.26' �v�+wcor�N � TOP (E) RIDGE ' EL 10326' � "' TOP! PLATE � � II I I FINlSHED FLR LINE I �� ll�f � _ � a� _ , 5�-0� � • ��r crro�ry AVETOC EL 88.76 _ I T i 16'-7" E SEfBACK 0' S' 10' 20' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" � 7YP. RED BRICK FIN15H WROUGHTIRON GUARD AND HAND RAIL, TYP. ^ I WROUGHT IRON GATE — � J 14'-0° I, E SEfBACK —�� W,P. WALL LIGHT FIXTURE TYP. WHERE INDICATED--i (E) REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4�=1�—a� � TOP (E) RIDGE EL.1U3.26' 7 � i� � � � ❑ � / IJ i � E LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: ' �/4"'��-0" � � GARAGE DOOR �---� � � E RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SGLE: 1/4'=1'-0� �❑❑� �❑❑� �❑❑� �❑�� o I p ro '+ i ----------------- 16'-7' � E SETBACK �� s� �S �� E a m � � wj �m � �g U � W � f j S y U � Qa�� s$ �� m $a <r�P' s �\ °� � ��I � tij y� �P a ��e�e�� AVETOC �� EL 88.76' � �� b�� 4��'�3��e TOP (E) RIDGE EL103.26'�_ J_ r,� � � . roPr a�n�. -.., - , 4 � � I --_ .. -- � _ _ , FINISki.D FLR. L1NE ___-- AVETOC m . ----_ EL88.76' � �1;i-?° � � (Fj K Z ti Q � r � � Q W J W Q �� O � S 0 m � J U � atS Z U U O g ?. w � ' � c N � IO � z 0 a w J W W pATE: 0 2 11 212 111 8 $CALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: RW ,pB Mp.: 15.1272 SHEET NO.: A-5 0 e �AX. &DG. H�GHT EL.= 30.00' FROM AVE LO.C. TOP (N) RIDGE EL 112.43' � (N) SECOND FLOOR TOP OF PLATE � r; i i�� m ii ;^� (Nl SECOND ROOR i aQ FINISHED LEVEL � � � � i (E) TOP OF PIATE ; 0 aO AVE. LEFf SIDE �T.O.C. EL= 94.99' Y' (E) FIRSf ROOR �q FlNISHED LEYEL m AVE 7.O.C. �_ �.�6� � "P £v' TOP (N) RIDGE EL 112.43' (r+) sEcoHu �ooR TOP OF PU1TE (N) SECdND FLOOR FINISHm LEVEL (� TOP OF PIATE G I E I I I I TYP. (N) WINDOW TRIM: 1X3 PAINTED TOP 1X2 PAINTED StDES 2X PAINTED SILL 1X2 PAINTED BOTTOM 12 3� _ 2 � I I � � I � � � ��11111111 �� A'�Illlli �!��!i�l � � ��'��'� ... �i�� 'Z IIIII �I�� i�lli II�II I.,I• �I �1��■ i (E) VINYL SLIDING WINDOWS W! SIMUL DIV. LITESTORECEIVE ; (N) WINDOW TRIMS AS SHOWN ON THE 2"� FLR. TYP. U.N.O. D I I1�:� �� I II � � FlN��° � ��---------------------- J J,_ 15'-0' � SETBACK 'r AVETOPCURB. EL 8�.76 0' 5' 10' 20' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" f� I[:�l DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE (N) COMPOSITE ASPHALT ROOFING TP MATCH IXIST- ING, 1YP. (N)1X 8 VER'f WOOD SIDINGS,'IYP (N) VINYL CASEMENT W/ INSUL GLASS W/ SIMUL. TRUE DIV. LITES TO MATCH MATCH (E) VINYL WINDOWS AND PATTERN OF DIV. LITES, TYP 2 PLACES THIS ELEVATION �------------i i i i� � � i i i i i i i I I ' i I I i I I `� I I `\�`. TOP (E) RIDGE `�� EL 103.28' �\ � ��. �� I�!�� 1�1 ■'�;�� 1�1 i�� ''�� _ 11 ��.�_�� 1�1 T � (N) FRONT ELEVATION �(N)ORNAME� - SCJILE: 2 ��4�-� -�• TYP.BRACKET A 7 C I � (N) iX 8 VERT WOOD SIDINGS, lYP• � (N) VINYL CASEMENT W/ INSUL GLASS W! SIMUL.TRUE DIV. UTES TO MATCH MATCH(E)VINYLWINDOWSAND_ ` PATTERN OF DIV. LJTES, TYP 4 PLACES � iHIS EIEVATION � STUCCO TO IAhTCH IXIST'G. ❑ ❑ � o i � Q 00 } i i � (N) LEFT SIDE ELEVATION � s�K �` - �� 2 ��4�-� -�� (� VfNYI SLIDING WINDOWS WI SIMUL. D1V. UTES TO RECEIVE (N) WINDOW TRIMS AS SHOWN ON THE 2N0 FLR. TYP. U.N.O. F I --�c-----� i � � � � � i i � ' o � � a I N Z AVE Poq{f SIDE T.O.C. EL= 87.37' B A.8 A (N) co►�Pos� as�T ROOFlNG TP MAiCH IXISf- I � � ING. TYP. 12 I � r� �.�3 � I REVI310N5 BY �,z��w� g �� rFx muw o�+ � �� og ro 0 �� c� � �$qF J p W ? �m � r- � U � wC �� x� U Q Qa�� Wm �m s� Sa � G �PS ,'iy� � rc r �^ < � � ga "d �ij � '(�' Y� *�P ��R�� °�3 , �� ¢� �o ��E�� e��$ z O Q Z � U y Q � J Q � 4 � z �n O � �O a'o U � J � � W � Z U W O � z w m ' � o N 'r zo U � w � o � Z O F� � J W W C H N � � � LL � Z Z � � DATE 02„?/20,8 SCALE AS SHOVYN DRAWN BY: RW JOB NO.: 15.1212 SHEET NO.: A-6 N (N) COMPOSITE ASPHALT I I ROOFING TP MATCH D(IST- ING, IYP. I I i i (N)1X 8 VERT WOOD SIDINGS, TYP --}--} �� (N) VINYL CASEMENT W! INSUI GLASS I i W/ SIMUL. TRUE DIV. LITES TO MATCH I I MATCH (E) VINYL WINDOWS AND PATTERN OF DIV. LITES, TYP 2 PLACES THIS ELEVATION STUCCO TO MATCH El(IST'G. Zf( —� $or: oF 2N� Fl-K PDprtlpN d�ERtYwf? �IUF[�D� � 'tX'I' I OI �`l��CAL Pr�A{.I�ET lLu=1� �n � �� I� ii�l�l ■�■�i �,� �i� �� ■�■ I\ �• � •• � � � • 1 .. .:. . � 0 � 0 I��_ _ �� 'lllllllii��- " �� "- !I"'I��I � I��I � — -------- I I �� ` i _ ■�I�■■ ■I■�� — — ' �ll� �I ��,�,�I�■■ ��■�� (N) RFAR ELEVATION - SCALE: Q 1�4•=1•-0• N ' T . AVETOP CURB ' EL 88.76 � TOP (N) RIDGE EL 112.43' `� (N) SECAND FLOOR �' TOP OF PIATE 0 .� (N). SECOND FLOOR FlNISRED LEVEL � (� TOP OF PUTE 0 I ao (E) FlRST FLOOR FlNISHm LEVEL �. � 16'-7' 0' 5' 10' 20' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" (N) VINYL FIXED W/ INSUL GIASS W! SIMUL.TRUE DIV. LITES TO MATCH MATCH (E) VINYL WINDOWS AND PATTERN OF DIV. LITES, lYP 3 PLACES A AS B THIS ELEVATION C r-o� w � , , i � � I I � �I�� ' ��I� � �] - ■_ii■li ■_ -- —.-- �. � _ 3'-0__�W . D i E i 1 - ��:::�::�::��::�::::i I: , � � �I��-� _ � �'�� j �• .� ■ ■ ■ ■ �■.■ �� ■ ■ ■ ■ 2 N RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION - SCALE: 2 1/4'=1'-0' TOP (N) RIDGE EL 112.43' (N) SECOND FLOOR � �� (^N')1 Ns�caro' n��ooa f�IV�� I.L1Gl. -� � � (� toP oF Pu7� i3 � , 0 � (� FlRST FLOOR FlNISHED LEVEL . � AVETOPCORB (� VINYL SLIDING WINDOYYS W/ �g� ��_____ SIMUL. DIV. LITES TO RECEIVE (N) WINDOW TRIMS AS SHOWN ON THE 2ND FLR. iYP. U.N.O. r r-0• w i i I I ��Q i 3 (N) COMPOSffE ASPtIAIT eooFarc � unTa+ oasr- ING. IYP. (N)1X 8 VERT WOOD SIDINGS, TYP. (N) VINYL SLIDIN� WI INSUL GLASS WI SIMUL TRUE DIV. IRES TO MATCH MATCH (E) VINYL WINDOWS AND PATTERN OF DIV. LITES, NP 4 PLACES THIS ELEVATION (N) VINYL fIXED INSUL GLASS eor� s�oes oF suaNc, rrP. STUCCO TO AIATCH IXIS7'G. T (N) ORNAMINTAL WD. BRACKET ' {S�e SFIONTI) � � 15'-0' � SETBACK -� �� /�� P9I1�MY'N L-� �VI9�CO�IE Q aQe n�uc oe; n�w carrE �� a� � � �E a z=F J b �� m � � U � wW F� xN UOa a a�e � �s J � � � �a i Qr � �I 81 � e � n�o�� Kivr �� a ��g��€o°� +�� a g ��8�� 0 i�S��'o�� ¢��3��=� ��g€� �i�€e9�a�a Z � � 4 Z U y � � j a � � Z � � � gx 0 m U LL 2 � p w � z U U � Z � � ' �� N z � 4 � ; U � g � Z F w O W � W > 0 LLl � J H � � � �� zz DAiE �1122M8 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: RW JOB NO.: 15.1212 SHEET NO.: A-7 e s TOP (N) RIDGE, EL 112.43' Q (N) SECOND ROOR TOP OF PLA1E (N) SECOND FLOOR FINIStiED) �� (E) TOP OF PIATE f� 1 I 0 � (� FlRSf FLOOR Flt�SHm LEVEL � � AVE TOP CURB — EL88.76` 2 3 i � I I 4 5 i i I I I I I I I I "� c �t� ,;.. «r' I ,�i?� " 4,�-��. -.,� i L 1 I I I � L1 J I � r- - •`.F �_ � , -- � r- " �- ________________'________ __ '___ _-L - (� VINYL SIJDING WINDOWS W/ SIMUL DIV. LITES TO RECEIVE (N) WINDOW TRIMS AS SHOWN ON THE 2No FLR. TYP. U.N.O. � (N) SECTION THRU B-B - SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' TOP (E}RIDGE EL 103.26' 4' "' TOPIPLATE WROUGHTIRON GUARD AND HAND RAIL, TYP.— � m � r i r#INISHED FlR. LINE AVETDC EL 88.T6 O � �' �� ■��i ■��\I ■��i ,, ��I ��I �, uiiiiii 5 4 I I I I I I I i � VlNYL SLIDING WINDOW W/ SIMUL. DIV. LITES, NP. FOR FIRST FLR. - ,i,,, 1��I ' , ■. (N) BRICK FINISH AT EACH SIDE OF ENTRY TO MATCH (E) FRONT UNIT ENTRY r � Y Y I I I � I II / / �-------� --- --� ______J � ------� � _____J ____ I ____' J _ i ______y L �� (N) SECTION THR� A-A - SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' 1.2 t TOP (N) RIDGE � � EL 11243' I � (N) SECOND ROOR TOP OF PLATE I i 0 i I W � (N) SECOND FLOOR FIN!$HED �y� _ � R (E) TOP OF PLATE � r N 0 i � (E) fIRST FLOOR FlNISHED LEVEL AVE TOC EL 86.76' o• s' , o• zo' SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" REVISIONS BY retn�xurnvu� �� ntR n�uc oEsbw nEv�wwrrExrs �� • d� �� U w� �� J W �rc � r v$ w� �� x UG z g �arcS �� a � �` r, OPS �¢P o �I a< 6 � �o U � i� $ �Yjy� �r i �� :� � <�6BG.�� g �� m�� W�=�€�� 4��R��r�e Z O ��. Z � U y 0 LLI Q � � � z u� O � o � m � U � J � p w � Z U W O g z w U � � � N � � w �a � � Z � U W � U z m � Z o '"" � � � DATE 0?/1211018 SCALE: AS Sfi01NM DRAWN BY: RW ,106 NO.: 15.1212 SHEET NO.: A-8