The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About851 Burlway Road - Staff Report,. 2� � � _., ; F TO: DATE: � CITY .�� °� BURLINGAME S T A F� R E P O R T �.,.o, �.• HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL su� BY OCTOBER 15, 1985 FROM: CITY PLANNER eY o�'� �� :. AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5 A -6-P�- �"V f ��v7 11/4/85 sue�ecT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIOIV ON A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN INSURANCE REPLACEMENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD RECOMMEiVDATION : City Council hold a public hearing and take action. The following conditions were considered by the Planning Commission: 1. that the conditions of the City Engineer's August 7, 1985 memo shall be met; 2. that the fleet size operated from this site shall be limited to no more than 25 cars and that this car rental agency shall be open 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and have no more. than two employees; 3. that no car repairs or car maintenance shall take place on site and no more than five rental cars shall be parked on site at one time; 4. that no car rental car deliveries shall be made at this site and no car transport trucks shall be unloaded or loaded at this site; 5.. that the car rental lease agreement„ shall be written in the City of Burlingame; and 6. that this use permit shall be revi�wed in nine months (May, 1986) or on receipt of any complaint regarding its operation on the site of 851 Burlway Road. Action Alternatives: 1. uphold the Planning Commission's denial of this special permit request for an auto rental agency at 851 Burlway Road; 2. reverse the Planning Commission action and grant the use permit with conditions for an auto rental agency at 851 Burlway Road. Affirmative action should be accompanied by a clear statement of the reasons for the action and should be taken by resolution. BACKGROUND: Agency Rent-A-Car is requesting a special permit to operate an insurance replacement car rental agency from an office building at r • � ' -2- 851 Burlway Road (Code Sec. 25.42.030). This car rental agency rents cars to people while their own vehicles are in the shop for repairs. The agency will rent 365 SF of office area in the building and wou ld park three rental cars on site, plus those non-rental cars driven by the employees. The business would employ three people full time on site and operate from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. During Planning Commission review we received a letter from the property owner agreeing to designate four on-site parking spaces to this tenant. The applicant also noted during review that they would be willing to guarantee that all rental cars in excess of three would be removed to either their San Carlos or Daly City locations within a fixed time, e.g., four or eight hours. At their meeting of September 23, 1985 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-0 (Commissioner Leahy absent) on a motion to deny the special permit. The reasons for the Commission's action included the number of car rental agencies in the city, difficulty of enforcement on this multiple use site, the fact that parking on site does not now meet current cod� (1:300 gross square feet, approved 1:400 gross square feet), current demand for parking on this site is heavy, and because the parking demands of this use exceed the number designated by code (use by this business 6, number based on original parking of 1:400, 1). Because of the parking demands of this use this business could only operate at this location at the expense of other tenants (Planning Commission minutes, September 23, 1985). EXHIBITS - Planning Commission Minutes, September 23, 1985 - Planning Commission Staff Report 9/23/85, continued from 9/10/85, continued from 8/26/85 w/attachments - Notice of Appeal Hearing mailed October 11, 1985 - Council Resolution Approving Special Permit MM/s cc: Agency Rent A Car, Solon, Ohio Brian Cochran/Ginny Goodwind, Agency Rent A Car, dba Amerex Rent A Car, Burlingame Jesse D. & Joreita Yohanan, property owners Brian Cochran, San Jose Burlinoame Planning Commission P9inutes September 23, 1985 1. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN INSURANCE REPLACEMENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD, ZONED M-1 (CONTINUED FROM 9/10/85) Reference staff inemos/reports 9/23/85, 9/10/85 and 8/26/85 with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed 3etails of the request, parking requirements, letter from building management of 851 Burlway designating four parking spaces to this use. Six conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. CP noted applicant's sugqestion that condition #2 be changed to require all cars on the lot exceeding the allotted four be moved to the San Bruno or Daly City locations within eight hours. Commission discussion: the fact that if the applicant's suqgested condition were allowe3 it would apply to any new user in the same location; parking for the full time employees and for visitors. Brian Cochran, Amerex Rent A Car (applicant) advised the employees drive company cars which are not parked on site all day; office is open all day with an office manager on site; two other employees, a sales representative and a delivery person, are there only 15 minutes at the beginning of the day; the delivery person is out all day delivering cars to body shops. He estimated they hav� five visitors per day, five minutes per visit. Chm. Garcia declared the public hearing open. Ther� were no audience comments and the hearing was closed. Further Commission discussion: location of car rental agencies in the city; enforcement of conditions of the permit; on-site parking for this building does not meet present code requirements; concern about sufficient parking for this business and its visitors now and in the future, or for any future car rental us� at this location; because parking requirement was less than current and spaces from that limited number are designated to this use, do not believe this use can operate in the space available to them except at the expens� of the other tenants in the building. C. Giomi commented that Commission has looked at several applications in office buildings with an intense use such as this; a landlord may assign spaces but it would affect other tenants and compound the parking problem on site and in the surrounding area. C. Giomi moved to deny this special permit. Second C. Graham; motion approved 6-0 on roll call vote, C. Leahy absent. Appeal procedures were a3vised. r „ r � P.C. �/23/85 (Continued from 9/10/85) SPECIAL PERMIT - INSURANCE REPLACE�1ENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY - 851 BURLUTAY ROAR . L ' T ' ' � [ Page 3 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 10, 1985 Engin r's August 19, 1985 memo and the Chief Building �'pector's August 1985 memo shall be met; and (2) that if survey shows any portion of e garage or carport overhanging pr rty line, within 60 days it shall removed. Second C. Graham Comment on the motion: me the another building permit, he feel the applicant has met t o t�cant did not know he needed to pay a penalty for this; do not al requirements for variance approval; there are alter ives to pro the garage which will meet code; do not fin is 3' variance a pro the addition will be an improvement to e property; one hour constructi ill be required for any walls ' in 3' of property line. The Fire Mars �dvised fire access the rear is sufficient. �""'° Mot�approved on a 5-1 roll call vote, C. Taylor dissenting, C. Giomi absent. Appeal procedures were advised. Recess 8:20 P.M.; reconvene 8:30 P.M. 3. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN INSURANCE REPLACEMENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY TO OPERATE FROM AN OFFICE BUILDING AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD, ZONED M-1 (CONTINUED FROM 8/26/85 Reference staff reports 9/10/85 and 8/26/85 with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, Planning staff comment, fleet size, applicant's letter, building manager's letter. Six conditions were suggested for consideration at th� public hearing. Discussion: it was noted building management of 851 Burlway has authorized four parking spaces to this applicant; staff advised that based on current code the building does not meet the city's parking standards. Roy Santos, office manager representing Brian Cochran, district manager, Amerex Rent-A-Car addressed Commission: they have been operating from this site for a year, have received no complaints from tenants of the building; most cars are delivered to several body shops in the bay area, they are left there and are not brought back to the office site; Amerex uses three on-site parking spaces per day at the most; this office is used only as a reservation and dispatch center. Chm. Garcia opened the public hearing. There were no audience comments and the hearing was closed. Responding to Commission question, applicant stated they could not conform to the condition requiring all lease agreements be written in the City of Burlingame; regarding limitation of the fleet size to 25, he could see no reason why they should be limited to 25 since even with a 90 car fleet most cars would not be in the parking lot. Staff advised 25 was an arbitrary number, since these permits run with the land it is a control on the volume of this and future businesses. In further explanation of the business, Mr. Santos stated they have 37 a Y , � • , , x u Page 4 �= Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Septe er 10, 1985 cars at present, they have had 45 in the past, all ar dispatched and do not�,come to the site, they go from one shop to a ther; this busines is insurance replacement, customers are m at the body shops. He recon�.irmed they could not meet the conditions egarding fleet size and writi,g of lease agrements in the City of Bu lingame. They have national ��counts and bills go out from the co orate offices in Ohio. Commission "omment: think the applicant shou investigate the possibility f writing all contracts in Bur ingame; concern that a future use co ld be any type of car renta agency; not so concerned about this use as about the long range i act of this use, a regular car rental age y could generate parkin problems; think Commission should limit th use to this particula use. Staff advised a special permit cannot be conditioned to a spe ific busines/person, consideration thi evening is clear a special permit determination. Mr. Santos stated e operation. C. Tay September 23, 1985. voice vote. Commiss next meeting who cou could not ma a decision on the conditions of moved to c tinue this item to the meeting of Second C. chwalm; motion approved on unanimous on reques ed a representative be present at the � act fo the company. 4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO °� ON A RESIDENTIAL L( A 50 SF SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA TO REMAIN 808 EDGEHILL DRIVE Reference staff report, 10/85, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, s aff review, study meeting questions. Two conditions were sugges ed or consideration at the public hearing. It was noted complaints ad be n received about this installation and it was before Commissio as a c de enforcement item. Bruce Kreger, atto ney represe ting Servamatic Inc. and Earl Nichols, their national in tallation sup visor were present. Mr. Kreger stated that those peopl who would norma ly be involved in this application did not learn a out it until toda most of the contacts have been through the br ch office or subcon actor; there have been personnel changes recen y in the branch offic He requested a continuance to the next Co ssion meeting in order t address the questions and issues whic were raised in staff's Aug st 19, 1985 letter. He advised Mr. Nichols planned to inspect the site morrow; the company is just starting t is business, normally they hav procedures for permits; the project m nager for this application is no onger with the company, their co porate offices are in San Ramon. C. Jac s moved to continue this item to the m ting of September 23, 1985. Second C. Graham; motion approved unanim sly on voice vote. 5. �SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A MOBILE RADIO-TELEPHONE S ANTENNAE AT 1350 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY, ZONED C-4 STATION AND Reference staff report, 9/10/85, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's description of the � a. . ' l ' � Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 September 10, 1985 cars at present, they have had 45 in the past, all are dispatched and do not come to the site, they go from one shop to another; this business is insurance replacement, customers are met at the body shops. He reconfirmed they could not meet the conditions regarding fleet size and writing of lease agrements in the City of Burlingame. They have national accounts and bills go out from the corporate offices in Ohio. Commission comment: think the applicant should investigate the possibility of writing all contracts in Burlingame; concern that a future use could be any type of car rental agency; not so concerned about this use as about the long range impact of this use, a regular car rental agency could generate parking problems; think Commission should limit the use to this particular use. Staff advised a special permit cannot be conditioned to a specific busines/person, consideration this evening is clearly a special permit determination. Mr. 5antos stated he could not make a decision on the conditions of operation. C. Taylor moved to continue this item to the meeting of September 23, 1985. Second C. Schwalm; motion approved on unanimous voice vote. Commission requested a representative be present at the next meeting who could act for the company. 4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A 50 SF SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA TO REMAIN ON A RESIDENTIAL LOT AT 808 EDGEHILL DRIVE J., Re rence staff report, 9/10/85, with attachments. CP nroe reviewed deta s of the request, staff review, study meetin estions. Two condit ns were suggested for consideration at t public hearing. It was note complaints had been received about is installation and it was before Commission as a code enforcemen item. Bruce Kreger, ttorney representing vamatic Inc. and Earl Nichols, their national stallation super ' or were present. Mr. Kreger stated that those people ho would nor ly be involved in this application did not learn about 't until oday, most of the contacts have been through the branch of 'ce subcontractor; there have been personnel changes recently in the ranch office. He requested a continuance to the next Commission m tin in order to address the questions and issues which were r ised in aff's August 19, 1985 letter. He advised Mr. Nichols plan to inspect e site tomorrow; the company is just starting this siness, normally y have procedures for permits; the project mana r for this application ' no longer with the company, their corp ate offices are in San Ramon. C. Ja s moved to continue this item to the me ing of September 23, 19.8 Second C. Graham; motion approved unanimous on voice vote. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A MOBILE RADIO-TELEPHONE SYSTEM TION AND ANTENNAE AT 1350 BAYSHORE_HIGHWAY, ZONED C-4 Reference staff report, 9/10/85, with attachments. CP Monroe re�iewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's description of the A � � � � � x Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 September 10, 1985 Engineer's August 19, 1985 memo and the Chief Building Inspector's Au ` u`�.Ft 30, 1985 memo shall be met; and ( 2) that if the survey shows any po tio'� of the garage or carport overhanging property line,,within 60 day, it.sshall be removed. Second C. Graham. +�. Comment oi� the motion: assume the applicant did not know�'he needed another bu�lding permit, he will have to pay a penalty �or this; do not feel the applicant has met the four legal requiremen for variance approval; tti'�re are alternatives to providing the g age which will meet code; do not find this 3' variance a problem the addition will be an improvement�to the property; one hour constru ion will be required for any walls w*,�thin 3' of property line. The ire Marshal advised fire access to t�e rear is sufficient. Motion approved o�a 5-1 roll call vote, C absent. Appeal pr edures were a3vised. � Recess 8:20 P.M.; rec�nvene 8:30 P.M. 3. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR TO OPERATE FROM AN (CONTINUED FROM 8/ Taylor dissenting, C. Giomi INSURANCE EPLACEMENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY FICE BUIL NG AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD, ZONED M- �� Reference staff reports 9/1 8 and 8/26/85 with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of th request, staff review, Planning staff comment, fleet size, applica letter, building manager's letter. Six conditions were suggest d f consideration at th� public hearing. Discussion: it was noted uilding nagement of 851 Burlway has authorized four parking paces to th applicant; staff advised that based on current code e building doe not meet the city's parking standards. Roy Santos, office nager representing Br n Cochran, district manager, Amerex Re -A-Car addressed Commiss'on: they have been operating from thi site for a year, have rec 'ved no complaints from tenants of the bu lding; most cars are delivere to several body shops in the bay area, they are left there and are not rought back to the office site; Am rex uses three on-site parking spa s per day at the most; this off'ce is used only as a reservation and ispatch center. Chm. Garcia ened the public hearing. There were no a dience comments and the hear ng was closed. �� Responding to Commission question, applicant stated they co ld not conform t the condition requiring all lease agreements be �.w�i.tten in the City f Burlingame; rzgarding limitation of the fleet siz� to 25, he coul see no reason why they should be limited to 25 since e�en with a 90 c fleet most cars would not be in the parking lot. Staf�s�� advised 25 was an arbitrary number, since these permits run with`�,he land it is a control on the volume of this and future businesses. `In further explanation of the business, Mr. Santos stated they have 37 � 1 t . �l . � � (CONTINUED TO 9/23/85) P.C.- 9/10/85- Item #3 MEMO T0: PLANNING COP�9P1ISSION FROM: CITY PLA�lNER SUBJECT: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARI.PJ.G ON SPEGIAL PERMIT FOR AN II�SURANCE REPLACEMEP�T-AUTO RENTAL-AGEN.GY-TO-OFERATE-FROM AN OFFICE-BIJILDING AT 851 BURLI�JAY ROAD, ZONED M=1 This use permit request at 851 Burlway Road was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of August 26, 1985 because there were some questions regarding fleet size and employees per floor area leased and there was no one representing the applicant present (P1anning Commission Minutes, August 26, 1985). Planning staff have contacted the app1icant and told him of the need for him to attend the hearing on Seatember 10,.1985. Y�� argaret h1onroe City Planner MP1/ s attachments y } > . � �.� Page 11 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes August 26, 1985 C. Jacobs moved to amend the 1968 use permit and for adoption of Commission Resolution Approving Special Permits with the following conditions: (1) that the conditions of the City Engineer!s August 7�, 1985 memo shall be met; (2) that the parking require �for the hotel use b revised to 365 parking spaces no more tha $ of which are compact talls, laid out as shown on the plan ubmitted to the Planning partment and date stamped July , 1985; (3) that all landscaping ' stalled within the parki area be maintained including installing and intaining landsca ' g on the island between the main parking lot and th arking lot onting on Burlway Road; and (4) that because its conditions re met the February 11, 1985 use permit is no longer valid. Second raham. Comment on the motio . think the ap� ' ant's request is reasonable, why should Amfac prov' e more spaces than the de requirement; if the parking requir ent were lowered to 329 would ' e to see the hotel meet other uirements in which it is nonconformin r_there are parking proble this site now, would prefer to keep the requirement at 365. Motion approved an a 6-1 roll call vote, C. Taylor dissenting. Appeal procedures were advised. 13. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW AN INSURANCE REPLACEMENT AUTO RENTAL AGENCY TO OPERATE FROM THE OFFICE BUILDING AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD Reference staff report, 8/26/85, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of th� request, staff review, Planning staff comment, applicant's letter, study meeting questions. Six conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. Responding to Commission question, staff advised a parking count of floor area in this building had not been made. Chm. Garcia opened the public hearing. Applicants were not present. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission requested more information: fleet size; existing floor area/employees in this building. Chm. Garcia continued the item to the meeting of September 10., 1985; Commissioners agreed on unanimous voice vote. Staff will contact the applicants and request they be present for the September 10 meeting. 14. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A DRY CLEANING SERVICE IN A PORTION OF THE BUILDING AT 327-329 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-2 Reference sta�f repo , 8/26/85, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed the item: details of t request, staff review, Plan '�g�'staff comment on issues, American Paci Equipment Co. lett� tudy meeting questions. Six conditions we suggested consideration at the public hearing. Fire Marshal con ingress/egress as shown on the plans was adequate. Chm. Garcia op�ned th lic hearing. Paul Zieman, representing the applicants, no�i e blueprints provided do not show existing { Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes bathrooms, dischargec3 felt indi be no mor�, parking in city when use; they work; may Guerrero, problem wi sized for owners' at permit is were no fu Page 12 August 26, 1985 final plans will be complete; chemicals will not be into the sewer sytem, this is regulated by the state; he idual delivery/pickup time for a dry cleaning service woul-'� than five minutes and that there is sufficient public the area; applicants will satisfy all requirements of e pplying for � building permit following approval of is o not plan to operate delivery vans, will do no w esale ossibly have once a day shirt laundry service t cks. Fred erican Pacific Equipment Co., spoke in favor• can see no t provision of bathrooms, will use existing nes which were t e previous nightclub use; have spoken wi the property t ney, they will be doing all the improv ents; once the ap roved complete building plans will b prepared. There rt r audience comments and the heari was closed. Commission dis ussion: concern about parking 'n this impacted area; not a goo3 locatio for this business with its '�tensive parking demand; Commission does not know what uses might into the rest of this building but ca ot deny because of that• what use is there which won't generate parking do not believe this w ld be any worse than on Broadway or Burli game Avenue. �" C. Jacobs moved to`� approved on a 5-2 r Appeal procedures w Recess 11:50 P.M.; r ITEMS FOR STUDY eny this specia,, permit. Second C. Graham; motion 11 call vote, ers Leahy and Garcia dissenting. � advised. �� fi4• � ec nvene 12�'�00 midnight. 15. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALE��J-A 50 SF SATELLITE ANTENNA DISH TO REMAIN ON A RESID IAL LOT - 808 EDGEHILL DRIVE 3 Requests: statement fro appl ant regarding alternative locations which would be less vi ible; st tement from staff regarding undergrounding of uti ities on C ifornia Drive; height of dish from grade. Item set for hearing Sept ber 10, 1985. 16. SP�CIAL PER T- MOBILE RADIO-T EPHONE SYSTEM STATION - 1350 BAYS RE HIGHG�TAY � Requests: will equipment room take require parking? will lights be required on top of the antennae by the FAA? ross section of how this will look on the building; how are the transmi ting antennae attached? Item set for hearing September 10, 1985. 17. SPECIAL PERMIT - COURIER OPERATION - 1722 GILBR�TH R 1 i Requests: will they use the whole site? how will enclos�ed area of parking be used? how many employees on site at one time? Item set for hearing September 10, 1985. � 851 BURLWAY RD., SUITE 400 • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 •(415) 348-2514 August 12, 1985 TO: Amerex Rent-A-Car 851 Burlway Rd. Suite #417 Burlingame, Ca. 94010 RE: Assignment of parking space To Whom it may Concern: � �westates♦ MANAGEMENT Westates Management has alloted four (4) parking spaces in the southwest section of the parking area of the 851 Burlway Road building for Amerex Rent-A-Car. Sincerely, ,j /K' > ��-" 'Lou arne Assistant Building Manager ��1�r�l�� ATTN: i�elen Towber � `;ui,i: Brian Cochran I=�z �arai.n� th� �r�arking situation for Amerex F�ent- A-Car. Our Building mgr. authorized fourspaces for our use. Ialso have no kwoledge of any problems concerning parking or traffic flow at any of my other four locati � erely, � � Z� ` Brian Cochran � �� District IVianager � • � �� l�merex Rent-A-Car � �"' �� i : J �`� � ►s . k' ��i � � � � � �+J�: ' `� 1��5 � �NNING DF.�PT� � �OMibfUNtCHTI�N RECEIV�D .�.`�'ER PREPARATI4N �f STAFF FtEPrOR7' amEREx REnT �a • caR Continued to 9/10/85 P.C. 8/26/85 Item #13 MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSIOv FROM; CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN AU'r0 RENTAL AGENCY AT 851 BURLWAY ROAD Brian Cochran and Ginny Goodwind representing Agency Rent-A-Car are requesting a special permit to operate an insurance replacement auto rental agency from an office building at 851 Burlway Road (Code Sec. 25.42.030). The agency will operate from a 365 SF office area within the building, no fleet size was indicated but a maximum number of cars parked on site of five was indicated. The company would employ two people full time. The business would operate from 8:00 A.M, to 5:00 P.M, City Staff Review City staff have reviewed this request. The Chief Building Inspector (July 29, 1985 memo) and the Fire Marshal (July 29, 1985 memo) had no comments. The City Engineer (August 7, 1985 memo> notes that the use should not be allowed if the parking on site cannot accommodate all parking required for the fleet and employees. Peak hour traffic generation because of the use is not a factor. Further the City Engineer requires that parking stalls be designated for this use but only after a parking count with floor area (by use) is made. Planning staff would note that this use as Droposed would occupy 365 SF of an existing office building and use Monday through Friday seven on-site parking spaces. The parking requirement for this building at the time of construction was one space for every 400 gross square feet, which is less than the current requirement for office parking of 1:300. As a result this use would consume the equivalent parking to serve 2,800 gross square feet of the building. It is, of course, difficult to know the average occupancy by floor area of the building, but this building begins with less parking than now required. Certainly the on-site parking will not be adequate for the employees of other businesses in the building and their visitors, if individual uses are allowed to consume more parking than required by their employees. A note on fleet size. If the applicant can run 98� of his fleet in the field and have only three cars on site on average (not to exceed five) he can theoretically operate a 150 car fleet from the site. In the past we have strictly regulated fleet size to something considerably less than that. The applicant does not state the fleet size, merely not?s that if cars are not in demand they will be shipped to a different area. A basic question is where will they be stored as they accumulate for relocation. Staff feels it might be more appropriate to regulate fleet size from this office. We tried to reach the applicant to discuss this issue but could not reach anyone at either number given us. -2- Past experience indicates that car rental agencies located on office sites frequently cause conflicts with other tenants. In addition considerable staff time is consumed pursuing complaints which result from incompatibility of the car rental use with other uses on the site. A�plicant's Letter In her letter of July 15, 1985 Virginia Goodwind states that this agency is an insurance replacement vehicle rental company. They deliver cars to customers. They either tow a car to the pickup site or use two cars to make delivery. When cars are not rented they are transferred to other locations where they can be rented. The rented car is returned to the place it was delivered. She reports that they do have two cars on the site of the office at all times. She notes in her second letter that there is no assigned parking on the site specified in their lease. Study Questions At the study meeting the Planning Commission asked a number of questions (Planning Commission minutes, August 12, 1985). One of these questions is addressed in the applicant's letter of July 15. The lease does not address designated on-site parking. The remaining questions should be asked of the applicants at the meeting since staff was unable to reach either of them. The questions were: (1> what does the applicant propose to do with the five rental cars and two employee cars if there is no designated on-site parkinq and (2) what are the operating conditions (area leased, parking available, etc.) of this company at their other locations? Planninq Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: l. that the conditions of the City Engineer's August 7, 1985 memo shall be m�t; 2. that the fleet size operated from this site shall be limited to no more than 25 cars and that this car rental agency shall be open 8:00 A.M, to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and have no more than two employees; 3. that no car repairs or car maintenance shall take place on site and no more than five rental cars shall be parked on site at one time; 4. that no car rental car deliveries shall be made at this site and no car transport trucks shall be unloaded or loaded at this site; -3- 5. that the car rental lease agreement shall be written in the City of Burlingame; and 6. that this use permit shall be reviewed in nine months (May, 1986) or on receipt of any complaint regarding its operation on the site of 851 Burlway Road. I�r,��,�. Margaret Monroe City Planner MM/s cc: Agency Rent-A-Car, Solon, Ohio Brian Cochran and Ginny Goodwind, Burlingame Jesse D. & Joreita Yohanan, property owners PROJECT APPLICATION �r CEQA ASSESSMENT Application received ( 7/15/85 Staff review/acceptance ( � c�rr � ��' �' 351 Burlway Road Suite 417 BURLINGAME project address �b;�'��, project name - if any ) ) 1. APPLICANT ,4gency Rent-A-Car, Inc. (216) 3�9-1000 �a�eDSA Amerex Rent-A-Car, I11C. telephone no. applicant s a ress: s ree , ci y, zi code Brian Cochran & Ginny Goodwind 851 Burlwa Rd. 415 579-5955 contact person, if different lephone no. #417 Burlingame, Cali� 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION Specia.l Perr^it (X ) Variance* () Ccndominium Pernit () Other *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Special Permit to allow an Insurance Replacement Auto Rental Agency in the P1-1 District (liqht industrial) The operation will deliver rental cars to body shops, homes and work�laces. It is located in an existing office building and occupies a 365 SF a��a. �one of +.be on- site arkinq is assi ned to this firrn. The applicant expects no more than 5 rental vehicles on site at any time. Two fu -time emp oyees staff the office. (attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed) Ref. code section(s): ( 25.42.030 ) ( ) 4. PROPERTY IDEPITIFICATION (026-112-130 )(Lot 3,4,5 6 and ptn. 7, Blk.2, Burlway Lnd. PkJ APN lot no. �lock no. subdivision name t r�—i � c °17�5 SF ) zoning district land area, square feet Jesse D. & Joreita Yohanan 851 Burlway � 40� land owner's name address Burlinc�ame, Cali�ornia 94010 Reauired Date received city zip code (�� (no) ( — ) Proof of ownershio (yes (�7�1 (t9issing ) Owner's consent to a�olication 5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing 60,280 SF office buildinq with on-site �arking for 174 cars. Re�uired Date received (yes) �rXtl� ( 7/15/85 ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall;s and curbs; all structur�s and improvements; paved on-site parkino; landscaping. (yes) �� ( 7/ 1 5/ 8 5) Floor plans of all buildings showina: gross floor area �) (no by type of usc�`on each floor plan. ) ( ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). ��(no) ( ) Site cross section(s) (if relevant). ) (7/16/85 ) Letter of Explanation 7/15/85 2ent-A-Car Questionnaire *Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT PR�POSAL NO nEW construction 1S proposed Proposed consi:ruction, 3elow qrade ( SF) Second floor ( SF) gross floor area First floor �SF) Third floor '(-f SF) Project Codn Project Code Pr000sal Requiremeni. Proposal Requirement Front setback Lot coveraae Side setback j��0 �hdn Ruildine heic�ht Side yard Lar,dscaoed area Rear yard Qn site pk�.snaces V. � l�VIULI.I � f�Vl VJI9L �I.UIIIl,I11UCU� Full tir�e em�loyees on site Part tir�e employees on site On-Site Visitors/customers (weekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trip ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles EXISTING after 8-5 5 PM 2 None None - 10 - None - IPl 2 YEARS � after 8-5 5 PM 3 PJon one - 20 - Jone - IPI 5 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM � •�- ,.,- a .- a � _ _ *Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet. 7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES Office & warehouse uses on adjacent sites, this use conforms to the qeneral plan. Required (�� (no) (�� (no) Date received ( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties. ( - ) Other tenants/firms on property: no. firms ( ) no. employees ( ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany vehicles at this location ( ) 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 ( X) Other application type, fee $ () Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 (X j Variance/other districts $ 75 () Negative Declaration $ 25 Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees S X( ) TOTAL FEES � 150 . �� RECEI PT N0. OIOO Recei ved by H. Towber I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. � i s . . Signature c te / i S �'� STAFF USE ODlLY NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No. The City of Burlingame by on completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. 19 Reasons for a conclusion: Cateqorically Exempt Reference Code Sec 15301, Existinq Facilities . �C��a/fil G�, � Si� ture of ro essing Official Title DdtiC Signed Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the deternination shall be final. DECLARATIO^! OF POSTING Date Posted: I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I oosted a true copy of the above Nega.ti��e Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to th� Council Chambers. Executed at ¢urlingame, California on Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P!o 19 JUDITH�. MALFATTI, CITY CLERK, CITY (!; SURLINGAP4E �� STAFF REVI EW 1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review hy: date circulated reply receivec City Engineer ( 7/18/85 ) (yes) (no) Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no) Fire Marshal ( !' ) (yes) (no) Park Department ( - ) (yes) (no) City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no) 2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATIOP! MEASUR�S Concerns Will this proposal meet all requirements of the Fire and Building Departments? Will the rental office have and adverse impact on on-site parking or traffic on adjacent streets? 3. CEQA REQUIREP�EPITS memo attached (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) (yes) (no) Mitigation Measures Request comments from the Fire h1arshal and Chief Building Insp. Request comments from the City Engineer. If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project: Is the project subject to CEQA review? NO Categorically Exempt. If AN EIR IS REQUIRED: Initial Study comoleted Decision to prepare EIR Notices of preparation mailed RFP to consultants Contract awarded Admin. draft EIR received Draft EIR accepted by staff Circulation to other agencies � � � � � � i � ) ) � ) ) ) � ) Study by P.C. Review period ends Public hearing by P.C. Final EIR received by P.C. Certification by Council Decision on project Notice of Determination � � i � � � c 4. APPLICATIOPJ STATUS Date first received ( 7/15/85 ) Accepted as complete: no( X) letter to applicant advising info. required ( 7/ 1 5/ 8 5) Yes( ) date P.C. study ( $�12�85 ) Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) J(no) Recommended date (�%2 �'�j Date staff report r�ailed to aoplicant (_.,. ), Daj;e Commission hearing (�/� /�s ) PP � .�' �`PP 9 ;'�/�� 'c�2�j: �—�`�'j�3/k PP Yes)J ( ��o) A lica�ion a roved%( ) Denied �� A eal to Council Date Council hearing (;c�� r 1 ) Apolication aporoved ( ) Denied ( ) f► c it/ � . �v ;'i /c� /�S' i � � / 1 —� -y-• CA f��' � D�-F'/''� . W J l/��O�r�'i�, si gned da� � . - ��.t;`�� RENT-A-CAR QUESTIONNAIRE �''i�Ci��t� Jiil 15 i98� BUF:LI F� e3AfH� CITY OF BURLINGAME �` � � � � � � � , � � �,. ; f � � � � � PL1INNING DEPT. �{ ' � , , I 1 1 j ( , „ o � , � ,. VqA7ED JUHS �. ,' • � � ' � " � I ' � - � 1 f � 1 � 1 � ' . Name of establishment Proposed �Burlingame address � 1. SITE DESCRIPTION (A site plan drawn to scale, showing property lines, all structures and parking areas, is to accompany this questionnaire.) Land area Gross floor area, all structures Landscaping � � � SF) SF) SF) ;f' Area leased by agency: office area (_=�f, v" SF) veh�cle storage within building ( G� )� vehicles vehicle storage outside, on-site ( �-�� )# vehicles off-site parking in regular use \ � � c : � «- .7 �,r 1 I� (� ' d" dl"ESS- , �'' �.;�C. . .-a..2. � M r,t�.L�(; "�\ L'c��k-c--c:,�� (�3C�4w.. �L�-c-�7�.G�„�i'..u��-G..ti.r.� C,�:.L. k.�� cE,o c�-�-�-�`- C,�,c��e-�� ►-,��ri tj � , I�/-�-��j�f�``'�}--� �� L (� _ �,+� l�tiu..,-� �.+�c� ✓VlSz.r..�c�" c�-o o�rti.� ' � �b\t <-iiL'l. �l-1,{J ��i�. l.C�� - i j G'�c�c,�� .-Nt i It..i.-�\ �S�l�'L'�k 1� l�G � L4 j��'�_.�;� � � Where are company vehicles parked when ' there is an overflow from the above areas? �� ;�,� e�,v 5 ' Are there other tenants or businesses on this property? , 2. COMP/�NY VEHICLES Address , Ci ty1��,��rn u� \ �: Lj�,_.�,�� l: `' ��V W'1� wt,+t-c.�W � ye s ( `; ) n o { ) ,x .o Sa.e�„-�.�.,� c.: n � � � -- �� c� o f+ �C.,�,� �Q _ r <' �{-c . �- Company vehicles to be kept in Qurlingame: average # rental vehicles, on-site peak # rental vehicles, on-site # shuttle vehicles (if any) average # rental vehicles stored off-site TUESDAY TNURSDAY SATURDAY c�� f - Where are vehicles: washed ��=-� �%':-f��•.;, �t� � ,��-; '��r .�`�"��,��zE� ��. --., • c�� oil changed minor servicing . 1, Address, City � � �, -� � ; I►e,p�J.;- S� �r�s C� C�-oo :rQai —f's�s`u.c;S �• � ., s� � ✓ ��v a � � �� Are any of the above services occasionally performed on-site? yes( ) no( •') Rer,t-A-Car Questionnaire Pa ge 2 3. COh1PANY EMPLOYEFS & NOURS OF QUSINESS Company employees to be based in Burlingarne: full time 8 AM - 5 PM full time after 5 PM part time 8 AM - 5 PM part time . after 5 PP1 TUESDAY THURSDAY SATURDAY „ ,� � � . ! ' I . r I � Describe the principal duties of the above employees: ` 1 � _ j�� r � ' � ; -. 1 1+� '' i• � ; I: . ' !: . '�1 l; �. i - '�- L• I j_ 1= � � � � ; .r � Where will the above employees park their personal vehicles? on-site ( )# vehicles; on-street ( )# vehicles; el sewhere i ' ' Address, City 4. OTHER LOCATIONS List other Qay Area branches of your firm: �-� ��-� �,s I here by certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the �est cf my kno��r�edge a:�d bel ief. Signature � /�� ' ( � i. , � � . i'� �,' � � ,Cs %i� Name p ease print � �G � �'res' d.� .., Position with company Ci Ci Date �p%Y��S� � i r � f ; ;. . ; r ,; . ; Company address for correspondence _ ;.. Telephone number ].2/29/80 - -s /��IERE� -�'� t�ENT-/�-�/�R July 15, 1985 T0: CITY OF BURLINGAME San Mateo County City Hall-501-Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: AGENCY RENT-A-CAR 300�0 Aurora Rd. Solon, Ohio ��139 LOCATION: AMEREX RENT-A-CAR 851 Burlway Rd., #�17 Burlingame, CA 9�010 Dear Sirs: �� JUL 16 i9R� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. As you have requested below you will find information helpful to your evaluation of our operating permit: We are an insurance replacement vehicle rental company. We deliver cars to body shops, homes, and workplaces of our customers. Our vehicles are often towed to the site of the rental. We also dispach two vehicles for one delivery in order to avoid the time necessary to tow. Most of our vehicles are rented every day. We have been operating at a 98/ utilization for the last six months. Thi�s means that �3/ of our fleet is not on site. The other 2/ consists of cars that are out of service and located. at service shops in the area. In the event we do not rent all of our cars out for a particular day, we transfer the cars to other locations where they will be rented for that day. When the customer is finished using the car they leave it parked at the same place it was delivered (usually a body shop). When we have another customer that needs a car we then pick up the car take it to a car wash and deliver it to the next site. Although we have not been assigned on site parking we do have two cars on site at any one time. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your patience in thic matter. If I may be of further service please do not hesitate to call me at (�15)-579-5955. Very sincerely, . . -�. ' � ,-�! `��`t��A . ;;_ . Virginia E. Goodwind Marketin� Representative . , -,- - -- - -- ---- , - - - -- -- -- - -- - _-_ �_ . - - ^-._' � : .__ _- -- - - --- -- -- -- - -- - -- .----1----i-_- --- l! - - . = � -- i � I i � � �� I I ' � - - � ! ' ' ! - � �- , , - -- - - � I ; � , , , , , ; , , --- - - --- -- ------- , , , -- - ----- —T-- - ---' -- - - -��-�-; - , _ -� -- -- a- I � , � � � t . --- ---- , � � i � � � , - ---- -- _ _ . � � '- '._'_'..�_�.'_____'.'"--__"_'__.. . ' "_ "__"__. � . . ._ __ I . I _ __' ___ - ""'_ _" '__ ____' __' , _ _�._-'._"_...._'_'_'__ � � , ' �_ " ' r r � , �u � � 1 � , , � , -- - --� - . _ -- - ---- - ---- ----- - ------- � � _._—.1—� �� 13 � ' -,— �. �� - - - - G � /�2. � --- - --�---i-- i i ' i i . _. - - — --- - , , i . , � , ' P� �� ; --------- --- - � � � a ��t � I � I �__, , � , ;' , �--- - --- --- - - ----- - --- ---- --- � %/C��_-.�/ inJzC;S� �GYG�. -- I I i- i i ;�_ i i i _ ____ — - - -�� - -,� e- �Q� _��.�.�4�/O/O ;—� i �TI ► ; ' I , ; - r.. � , -i-. , ; ; I , _.T i �. _ _L. � I ----- ---..___ , I , � i � i ; i i I - - - --------- - - - -- ----- � � � , � � i i �j -(- I � � i � � � � I � I ! ' ' -- � � ! � I I I I � I I ----�o�.' _ _ � -- � _ �� i�c� I I _� I i i ---- _ _ _��[/ GZG',UZG'-� - � ----- � i � i ; ' i � � ; ; , i � -- Q I ; i � i � , � ��- � , � - G�r ��7�� --- L � � I ! , - ------ --- --- ,- � I � � � � � � I I � � I j � , , , � , � i � i � � , ----- _ _ --- --- -- ---- --- _�--�� - i � � I � : ---- ---- -- ------ , ---- -i -- i � i I I i � � i _ - --- -- �•---- ------- - ----- �i- _-___��L'�G'CGX�•� C� � /��:l�l� � _-�� %/ ? ; j ` � ' _ _ , � � , , ' , � , I � � � -- --- -- - -- -- --- - --- - - - -- - --- L ' � , i i 1 � � , : � C� ��O%D ; � i � ; � =- -- -- - - -.---- --- -- � � ' � _� � � -- _ -�� _ � ,-_ - --- - - -, ---- ,--- -;— ; , ; , ; , � ; , i I , i � - ; - - - - ---, _ 1 • l i i , . • j � - -- - - - --- - , , ----=-- � -- , -- - -------- ----- -- � - -_ --%��i �f%-��,_�� _ � � _ _C�.�. _ �r� �G�2a�rre�_� _ G�..��e�%� ,�' , � , ,.� � -- - - -- - -- �_--- - - _ . ` --- __ -,- - � ;-- - - - - ----. --- , , — - -- � /�C.- i�c�; i2�i _�_L�_ � G��- � -G� �/�C . _---- ��_ _ DG_� _ -- - , , � , ; � i , ' , - - --- - ---- ' - - --- ' / -- -� � '- --- � -.- _. _ _- � ---L�C_C«/c�uCz�_� _�QGc��__C��cf_ ._L�.� ,�R� ��.-e!�-.� _ �.�l�rz�_ � , . , � , , , ; � - - � � _ - - --- -- _ - . ; --- ��iZ..--� .f � ,�2�� i�r_/�P� ---�'c-� - �..�-- Q ��cczn� � �Gz�cvs � , - -------___ .----------------------- - - --- ---- _ � _. , . , � ; , , . , � � � i i I i � ' ---- � - ' _ -��UQ_ � - -- -- -- -- - - - --------- _�_' - - - ------- � � '-�� i � i ! ; i i � ___ _ ; �_ i i ' I I � I � � � i � ---`�-- ' - � 7" �� I� -� � - , � ' : ' ' , � ' ; � ' � �2�� . - , - -.- --- ; �r -�`-.- , - i ; --� , ' ; �' - i ' � I , � . - - ~ � „,� , � __ --_ _ � -�r�_�2'_ __ s �.� _ �� __ --��-L-!! ' �!1'- -- � � - � -- _ ____ �_-__ -�' � --�- � � � � . , , � ___.____._ _ ____ __ . _ __ _ _____ __ ___ . _ ___ ______ _ __ __ __ _______ �, ; � � � j � i � � I ------ - - . - f� - --/� �� -- � -- � ' �- --- -- - - _� � � ; , ; ; � ; i � ; , ; , , ----- � � � _ -- ------------ - ----- -- , - --- - -.-- -- - ; _: _ � - -- ------ � � -�---�-� -�---� �� ' I ' � - -- ; -- _ _ ; _ --- ---- , i ' ! � ! ---�--t---�---� i ` ; --- --' ! -;-- - , , , i i I i , , � ' ' ; � � I � - ---- - ---- --- - ------ l- � �_ � L-:_L- - - - - - ----- ---- i I i i I I I � � -� --�---- ' I I � i � I � ' � � � I ------- -- - •----- - _- '---- � . �- � ---- , � --' I I `-�- I - -� --�- `!- 1 -- - � --=--_._-� ' 4 ._. --'-------� ---- ------ . - � I J , -----�---T I � ---I------I -'?-� f ' - . ,-----r ---- --�- � � � ' � ' � � � . . . �.�. �� -,.:�.. —w:� ----••---- �� RiECEIVED JU� � 5 i�85 CITV OF BURLINGAAAE M.ANN{NG DEPT. . -.. � . � '.� �� / ' �. � �� 422 419 .� _ �ME,e�x ��YT A- CA�e oFFicE' �� \ 1, a 1 41� 4�7 415 41 I _1 � . � „ � ,� ,� . , :' � ' � ' � '. � � , � I � . �� :ti • . , � • ! . ' � �F� E ExT : 41�.� � � , � � . . �� . 4�9 � 40�' � a..nc �ins A`� 8� �_L'� � L�� O � L At:� , �ca�E'. � j�'� SS� BClRLWAY KD�D r-- 1 _ 1 1 1 N 9 ' S ' L 1 � W v � v) N . �i,i � � Y � �� ii � ' a+eG W '.:�iCi :- V „ � ': t� < n ;.. �"'"`" '. u) a i� �9 . � �_ _ '� 1 �" 1 � � 7■+c � �a l � __ i � __ , s s> >e• s�•_w si�,oe� ��r.��.��e��' I (�'' _ �� l =� � � SPACE=. I4- �P�GES . � �� . � \ -I \ \� \ \ \ \� \ \ \\ \ � . � �� ; \� \ \ �� \ � \ \ \\ � --- � �-- � -- --� -- - � _ _ _ _ - \� - . -- . . � � -_ - � .; � �---- , -- -- --�-- � � ; ; ; �, , � ; ___ I I � � � � � . �� . . � � � � � � '2 SPACES Iz SP�.G'ES �.,, � i � i � i I � I ; i ! . � � ' I � I I i ' � --�--- - �------ �---1 -- i -- I �_ _:..-�-- �- --- _ _�--"."__" i'.' _�r_._T _ � I � I i I i I i i I I I , � � � \ �� • � . � , � �� 12 S PA C E.S EXISTING PARKIN6 12 �PAGES i � i , � , � ; � � ! � --- --..---1---1--- � --- -- i -- _ ; i- ; i I i � ! i I I ! � � I I I � ! � i i I � - --. --�- : -- - I' �� - - W � � o V% N � - -- - � W 1 ;, a 0 . � 1 � — 1 � � I��--r' W ; , ' ' ' � � � ' ; i j I _J � � Z4 SPACE� ` I � � 12 SPfILE.`: � —i� � � � � I� � I�ELOGATE EXIST. GU(ZB Q. fEfVGE, f�ELOGATE :XIST �UK6 �� , PAT�H ASPHALT PAV;NG 23 SPAGES PATLH �PH,4LT P�IVING r--- f TKASH � I ' � � � � � � I I I I 19,SPAcES , l 1 fue� � , � I j , � i � � , ��-� � � I I � � ; � � , � ( i ' � , � I ;� 1 l__ �-- -1--�-- - I I , I � � �� ' —' —I --- -- � — I — --- I — � - 1—� �� 3 38 1a' 36� W 417.38' -__--__--��-�� s ' J . / , / . / . � / ' / . / � % �� i j ,, . t , DATE: %�!�'�,�'� MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER +�C�iIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: -5/'�°�� % j Cu,.�,t,; .� �Z-�'�w ur2 ih.��,sE„�rce /�/�/�c�Grn.,etLf- � Q.G�(Z' �� r,,r�c.-� ci...�; �� t_ ��., ��-t" Oj3 / �f.. �/.��l..c.r ✓�' Z-�i An application has been received for the above project for review by the Planning Commission. The application will be scheduled for .5,�/��'� at their �'/i$ f�� meeting. We would appreciate having „_�_, your comments by ,�/� .:._+'S Thank you. Helen Towber Planner s/ dtt. 02 � � �� - , /C� � C� /?i � f iz � . ,� ( i' (J • . , ; ` �� ,(,,,�--�Gt��L� rii-e. �.�� %)us /ro o hJ c'� �c.,�s . �-� T0: Planning Department FROM: Engineering RE: Insurance Auto Rental at 851 Burlway DATE: August 7, 1985 As with all uses in the gayfront and Rollins Road corridor, our main concerns are parking demands and traffic generation. This project should provide all parking for both storage of vehicles and for employees. Since the peak traffic period for this use is probably not during normal peak hours, the traffic demand is probably not much different than office use, at least for this number of vehicles (2- 5). Traffic demand therefore is not a specific concern. Staff recommends that this application be conditioned on the following: l. That sufficient parking spaces be assigned and signed for this use, both storage and employee. A parking count together with floor area should be made to determine if spaces are available before assignment. By rank C. Erbacher, P.E. City Engineer • • ; `' ► Page 8 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes August 12, 1985 18. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT - AMFAC HOTEL - 1380 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY I��n set for�hea�ing August 26, 1985. .�----` '�� ..,......- -._.-� � � '�.�,�....�'" 19. SPECIAL PERMIT - INSURANCE REPLACEMENT AUTO REN'I'AL AGENCY - 851 BURLWAY ROAD Requests: what does applicant propose to do with five rental and two staff cars if there is no designated on-site parking? what are the operating conditions of this company at other locations outside Burlingame? would like to see lease regarding assigned on-site parking, if any. Item set for hearing August 26, 1985. 20. SPECIAL PERMIT - DRY CLEANING SERVICE - 327-329 LORTON AVENUE Requests: does applicant realize there is no immediate parking for drop�..-off customers, how do they propose to accept cleaning from custoin�rs? will they use a van for pickup and deliv�ry? Item set for hearing�.August 26, 1985. .r' COMMISSION�� REQUEST ,��'`� � Two Commissione�s suggested a study of �`rking for athletic clubs since it seems present arking is inadequa� PLANNER REPORT ��y,� ��'� r Planner Towber noted recen#� ' quiries about modification of private balcony railings to provid 6' enclosure. Commission discussed briefly: at one location,,> alco 'es have been enclosed completely; is latticework as serious;�s enclos with glass; condominium requirement is for private open �:�ace, but if i's open it's not private; a 6' railing doesn't giv,,�°ventilation or 1' ht to the room it serves. One Commissioner stat�.%� he would prefer to ok at each request individually ra�iier than change the ordina e. Consensus was to study the issue, see�'what other cities do and rese ch why Burlingame's ordinance wa� written as it is. •�-.,,� ACKNOWLED,(�'MENT �,� r` .. August.�2, 1985 letter from the Chief Building Inspector,t�o.Nick Genner, 1128,.4xford Road - subject: wall construction. AAJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Robert J. Leahy, Secretary Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes ITEMS FOR STUDY 10. 11. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT - 137 ANITA ROAD TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP - 137 ANITA ROAD Page 7 August 12, 1985 Requests: will the guest parking spaces be marked for guests? wi11 the garage be enclosed? will additional lighting be used for security purposes? Items set for hearing August 26, 1985. , ��, 12. CONDOM�NIUM PERMIT - 1444 EL CAMINO REAL 13. TENTATI�� CONDOMINIUM MAP - 1444 EL CAMINO REAL Requests: will��the two unsecured parking spaces at the front of the building be desi,gnated for guests only? clarify the direction of travel for the stairway.,between the second and third floors. Items set for hearing August 26`�, 1985. ,,� 14. VARIANCE FROM'��IINIMUM LO'I' FRONTAGE REQfJIREMENTS FOR TWO OF FIVE PROPOSED LOTS:�`RESUBDIVISION OF 272p MARIPOSA DRIVE 15. TENTATIVE SUBDIVIa,$ION MAP - 2720 M'ARIPOSA DRIVE Requests: can heights be�.,,limited to one story? where is front setback measured from? does the��.ommission have authority to designate setback off a private road? what '�ddresses will be used? isn't a private drive an unusual situation?�� location of seismic area; are traffic impacts consistent with surrounding area and previous church use? what is buildable area of these lots? why no sidewalks? is lot size comparable to other lots in the�,area? Items set for hearing August 26, 1985. �� . 16. SPECIAL PERMIT - AFTERSCHOOL'yCHILDCARE PROGRAM - HOOVER SCHOOL BUILDING - 2220 SUMMIT DRIVE Requests: note this business starts a'� 11:00 A.M., define "afterschool"; is hallway included in the lease, if it is going used for other than a hallway would like comments from the Fire Marshal; review total trip impact of all�`°�urrent tenants; think was concern previously that site was fully�_utilized, could this checked out in some way? Item set for hearipg August 26, 1985. to be there be 17. MASTER SIGN PROGRAM - 1500-1508 ADELINE DRIVE Requests: de�.ails on height and method of support°for Sign A-l; applicant's�intentions regarding window signs; add condition that all existing signs be removed prior to issuance of permits on the sign program; provide detail of how proposal exceeds code limits; how will applicant assure that tenants comply with the master sign program? Item set for hearing August 26, 1985. n � _ �, •, � f , � � � , e r,. t�Y.'w � � f e•` �r„ \ 1 *,. .'� y,, . > �'J � / •��;�a�� ` � ��, �� , � � . �4 , l� � , / �� '\ I . .- � ' '� � , ,� � /- , `�" r ' � ` +`� ` �_ � I�3, .ti �;: ' - / �- / �. ��,' i .7 � •�. �" i � �y i��I/�� • � �j, � v �� ' �.� * . � . � " � ` // /�`��'� � ` /��I � : � � r` ii . , r , , r ' �� :''-. -, � � � f`� � / /, � �. J � � ` :.� a � � ' 'r � �� y , , `��C�` ' � f, ; °' �r ., : �' "�,� � . � .� ';3 - - s �►: i . � . � r_EC,��,,� � � �, � �. ' _ ' � ._ � : � ., yo•P� �'.; �;f��-�� /-��j� I ' f �' r � ' ' . . �!.�'- " , f •'- — t� ' � . . �e � ' �� 4 v � � � '''�` - '�; f° i , � �;' `' -f! � , , � � " <<. .. � , G , _ . -., '�y _ ��► ,A . �`t.:: � , �v ��. ,� . �, 4 ,.. . ��'�''" ; ��'o., � � � � � ~ /'�. ,'' *. •_ rI- �i �,' k � �� , � � �' � _ , F _ � , ,A ,- ;� f, . �, � r-` � �' - ;- :� _ / '�� , \\ _ - ..,,� - , r '� r �' �/r �', - `i ' �� y3, , � . 3 � �: �' - �Y ''� � - � . . '` � � _ r � _ � 1 F - ,� '`i•� `. � � - ` «� � . � 1 � M �,.:3r `� •�-- w� °e . � r. � - ' _ � • �•., _ �l � . ! � . ., .� ,�!�•�.�� a � }.. � • s' � * � � � � � � r � .� ♦ 7 '� M � I- p�. ( � . �Iq � • � � ..1 .� � • , .. ^�.,} �� . • i ♦*��J� ^- w r . � r, . - % �(�''!j''*� � rG. ' � .o�, -t _ _� ` � �'" ? ` �/ ��`r,F �. ' + � - � � � �' -� ,,y �"�� `; �:� � _ -- � � r �. �� . - � �- ! �- . � - � " � . .. � � ... \ -- � � � �1 � _ ` � � r � ,� , �r Qi p' r �. � '` � ' � � �,� � � � � C � Y "'., ,Ar . � C' .. � � � f � -.` - � '� � `~ • '� • u - 4 � f ` � ,;. . � � , � � � - • � � . _ � �,. � w -•�- ., t�-_ .#�'''� , ,.� , ._: . _ :� .�- < „�r"`� r . � " - . � • :i'r,R'� �! •�f' � � • . ` ' . + r q _ s. r � � � . �- � ..� iMr - r - r � - -- - - - � ti`•� _ �rk r �. � ' ` �� -=� � _ � `� -�� x '�� " _� � �t. • (_ L • • . . , i_ . ' � : �i' t�, �f •'� �'F`h=»�.�' .+ . � �� . : _ ' �.�� -- f � Q� � r- . . �??�.•� � '�. , � ,''►- � r /• , - �r-=�- - � � � � ;�_ rt'i-.'M ,��' - �- �"i;c-L -- ��,.�� 4. � �� k r -� R � � , � -�;�,: 4 .�! ;F � � •' �" _ �, �' r . . . • . � i � ; i�% � �y r'!� '�'• ,`. ''' . � T _ — . � .��sGd » 14 .. •ar.�;ir ��r �� T�►.�. �. �. .�YM�r r� ��. � I�—._ -, �-_._-.,._.__` r� - - .. r.r,._ �- T � �"�� 'b �AAT[D JVN[ �.�t� C�t�� IIf �urtinr��m� SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, GALIFORNIA 94010 TEL: (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING SPECIAL PER"•�IT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that t+londay, the 21st day of �ctober, 19°5 , at the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Char�bers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the City Council of the City of Burlingame will conduct a public hearing on the appeal of an application to allovt zn insurance replacer�ent auto rental a�encv to or.erate fror� th2 office buildin� at 351 Gurlu;ay Road, zoned f�-1, bv Ac�encv Rent-A-Car, dba Amerex Rent-A-Car, with Jesse Yohanan (pror�erty ovmer. At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER October 11, 19°� RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERI�4IT RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame �that; i WHEREAS, application has been made f-0r a special permit �for an insurance replacement auto rental a ency in the M-1 District �at 851 Burlway Road - #417 and �Ap� 026-112-130 �i WAEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on September 23 ,1985 , at which time said application was X��i4��C den i ed ; L �� WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to �OUiICI� and i �. �a hearing thereon held on November 4 ,19g 5, ,+ NOS4, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETER'.•1INED by I �,this Council that said special permit is aPproved, subject to the Iconditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. �� I It is further directed that a certifed copy of this 'resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of ;�San Mateo. yor I � I, JUDITH A. MALFATTI, City Clerk of the City of I 'Burlingame do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution �aas �introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the � 4th da of November � _ Y ,198 5, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COU.ICILi1EN: NOES: COUNCILt1EN: ABSENT: COUNCIL:�IEN: i i ( City Clerk I