Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout851 Burlway Road - CEQA Documents�lt��1�1�ir �� � ,/!.. ('ITY \ ��,j.; . - -,-rr:�� � �;v�\ � : �_'L:-, ��._ F:UF?;_l�d��ANIE ���,�_.,i .T oe \9,.. � k�y�.:,�4 . ��'ATEo vUNlb� rrt�rr��rzv� Dr-.cr.�R11TION Ter►tative I'rocedure 5/10/73; �uh-ic�ct t�o Revision 851 BURLWAY ROAD Pto�ect llddress or Location File No . N D-228P Pro j ec� Title : LA PETI TE CAFE Type of Pernlit : SnPri al PPrmi t tn o�,Prate a snack bar i n the M-1 Di Stt^1 Ct Lega�. Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, 6 and SWLY 17.06' MOL of Lot 7, Block 2, Burlway Industrial Park (APN 026-112-130) � Zone : M-1 Properi.y Owner: Name: Sherwood Group I and Group II Address : 5 Bon Ai r Road #225 Larkspur, CA. 94931 Applicant: Name : John Douveas Address 1700 - 18th Avenue Contact Person: John Douveas Area Code : 415 Phone : 343-6477 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for a snack bar on the second floor of the "Wells Fargo Building" at 851 Burlway Rd. The snack bar will seat 18-20 people and will be operated by Mr. Douveas and his wife from 8 AM to 4 PM Monday through Friday. Sandwiches, salads and soft drinks will be served. A microwave oven will be used to heat the food; no cooking will be done. The City of Burlingame by �OHN R. YOST on February 13 19 80 , completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: (XX) St will. not have a significant ef�ect on the environment. ( j No Envirorunental Impact Report is required. Reasons for a Conclusion: The modest floor area of this shop and limited seating would seem to confirm the applicant's intent to provide services to businesses in the immediate area. Little drive-in traffic is expected. The property owner feels that the 171 on-site parking spaces will be adequate, since most lunch time customers will be employees presently working within the 58,000 SF office building. FEBRUARY 13, 1980 Date Signed gnature�.,of �rocessing Official CITY PLANNER Title Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final. Date Posted: FEBRUARY 14, 1980 DECLARATION OF POSTIPJG I declare under �enalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of tne above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers. Executed at Burl i ngame, Cal i forn ia on �� ��4 �;✓1�� �� , 19�� � Appealed: ( )Yes ( ��No J� �e. � San Francisco, CA. 94122 , �.� %✓ - /�r�� E.VEL1'� H. HILL, CITY CLERK CITY OF BllRLING/IhiE f� �I �� � � � � � � �"A L ���n= �-�� U� � �.. _ Quwuri�:;�ra� A � +� � �► � � E t�! �T � L... � �,.. t v 1� ,"�.�,;� . � �,;1�.����1 ld o0 C� � \i �� f V I V I�'iJ. �APTfDJVN[�. CITY OF BURLINGAME �pplication for a Planning Department Pu�NNiNG �PT- Date Filed %� �C'��� �' �etermination on the Need for a Project EIR Recommendation �orm E2, Revised July 1975 �entative, Subject to Revision Date Posted t . PROJECT Name ,� � Description ��� ���c.- ��;� �: S�riD�� �� c�,�-� �fft��"'. _ Type of Permit Required _ �'i �-� �:.�� ,='<<,� �, , T %� �. APPLICANT Name __.� C'f7�i1% Address �5�, 3. PROPERTY ��� t,'� rts � � � c t l ^�L,v ,�'�% �.� c'. ��( . CEQA File No. f ��/� ' Telephone � `� ;4 �' — � f �/— Owner's Name �� � ST� %C` % ,��`.-� /�-C��'� F��i < Telephone ���� -��%%• Owner's Address /���" �i1�� . �1 /zi /��; ,�-�� ���iti,.`� �r-���/ :3 j,� . Legal Lot Block Description: Subdivision Land Area �. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS �. �. 7Gi LG�. k) tC�t�' � S E:k' � S APN Zor�e PROPOSED PROJECT j,���� j� �j�;� Sct_zZ��c�.�, �li 5>!� c n FEE: _$25_ Receipt No._ ;� ��Cy Received by , .�'!� -f���� �4P.. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the � ,-- informa�ion given herein-is true and correct to the /,Ji� �'A Tt �� �- best of my knowledge an� belief . A L L�, l� �. �3 T'i c N �e � �" , Signature��.�u✓ : , � ;= ��" -' ,'� Date � -- / % � . f t , ' ;� (Applicant}�^ EVALUATION BY CITY PLANNER ,The modest fl oor arc�a of thi s s hop and 1 i mi ted seati ng woul d , Signature � � , u�� ' Date 2/13/80 sPPm to confirm the applicant's intent to provide services to businesses in the immediate area. Little drive-in traffic is expected. Property owner feels the 171 on-site parking s aces will be adequate since most lunch time customers will be employees presently working within the bui ing. Planner DETAILED INFOFtMATION ABOUT PROPOSED PROJECT 8. IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT What are the objectives of this project? ���v��,-, �/�. 5«�_�u-�, �-1 .c 7�-r _t'?�,c�'. z�ry�/al�rlJ �NG�a/v. What alternatives to this project have been considered? /t����. How much environmental effect will this project have? //�,y,� What are the adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the project is i_mplemented? �:�-ry,� What mitigation measures are proposed to reduce these adverse impacts? , �� � S I r' . 9. PROJECT DETAILS A. Present land uses, project area: �� Use 1(describe, area SF) Use 2 ( " " " ) Use 3 ( " " " ) B. Present land uses, areas adjacent to the project: �,����,,� �»:,Y i� � t: s f, r� C� f�� �� �, l C! , �� C. Effect on topograph and natural features:��17 � D. Effect on trees and vegetation: /v���.� 0 E. Proposed construction Below grade First Floor Second Floor Third & above F. Lot coverage (area) G. Floor Area Ratio (FP.R) H. Building height I. Proposed materials (Gross floor area, GFA, in square feet, SF) �� J. Estimated Flows in gallons per day Water consumption (gpd) Wastewater from site (gpd) K. Estimated people at site Number of residents Permanent eriployees Visitors, customers, etc. to site L. Estimated parking required Autos all day parking Autos• short term parking Trucks and service vehicles M. Estimated vehicle movements A.M. peak hour P.M. peak hour ��) Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years to site to site � from site from site