HomeMy WebLinkAbout1537 Drake Avenue Lot 10 - Approval Letter� RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
2018-U04749
11.53 am 01/24/18 R1 Fee: NO FEE
Count of F'ayes 40
Reeorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
M�rk Church
Assessor-C�unt Clerk-Recnrder
�� �� � I������ I�����i�� ii ��i�i ��� � I�I iI�'�I �6I� i I il�. I��i
��III I� I I ���I � 1�1 �, ; 9;� k
#.� �2 0 0�� 5 0 4
Resolution No. 064-2007
1537 DRAKE AVENUE, LOT 10 - APN 026-033-270
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the
document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my
o�ce.
Date:
William Meeker,
10, 2018
ity Development Di
, . "r � .. ..4 ' 1
R � J� ':�" y T� � +
�' � i' �?�� i���,
�� '
:�
� ��:.�, �.
,I� �4 1�
�
��i,� �
_= � ' �;� � �ltlli�
�-. ,
�� � ',
\ .,r r:�:.
_� - �
�
�
Corrected Copy
064-2007
submits Resolution
cover page with an
original signature
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Resolution No. 064-2007
1537 DRAKE, LOT 10 - APN: 026-033-270
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the
document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my
office. ,�
.:.
Date: Julv 19, 2007
� ...! �.;,
��.� �LS��i.s��ir�iia�
• � �- - •• f - •
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, an Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration has been proposed and
application has been made for Desiqn Review Conditional Use Permit for emerqinq lots and
Special Permits for building heiqht and declining heiaht envelope for a new two-story sinqle
family dwellinq at 1537 Drake Avenue Lot 10, zoned R-1, Otto Miller, P.O. Box 121,
Burlingame, CA, 94011, property owner, APN: 026-033-270;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
Julv 9, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-523P, is hereby
approved.
2. Said Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review, Conditional Use
Permit and Special Permits are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto. Findings for such Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Design Review, Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits are as set forth in the
minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the offi
records of the County of San Mateo. ,
I, .'�,I�Di�,s , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City�of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 9t" day of July, 2007 by the following vote:
1537 DRAKE AVEf`JUE, LOT 1G - RE50 64-2007
AYES: Auran, Bro�,vnrigg, Deal, Osterling, Terrones
NOES: None
ABSENT: Cauchi, Vistica
RECUSE: None
�
Secr tary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 1
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department date stamped March 13, 2007, sheets A.1, A.4, A.S, U.1, L1.1, S.1 and
D.1 through D.4, and date stamped June 7, 2007, sheets A.2, A.3, A.4A, A.4B, A.5A,
A.5B, A.6 and L1.0;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans and the City Arborist
shall verify that all required tree protection measures were adhered to during
construction including maintenance of the redwood grove, an appropriate tree
maintenance program is in place, all required landscaping and irrigation was installed
appropriately, and any redwood grove tree protection measures have been met;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;
and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
6. that the conditions of the City Engineers' May 31, June 4, August 30, and October 15,
2002, June 27, 2005, and June 18, 2007, memos, the Fire Marshal's September 3,
2002, June 22, 2005, and June 18, 2007 memos, the Chief Building Official's August 5,
2002, June 27, 2005, and June 15, 2007 memos, the Recycling SpecialisYs August 27,
2002, and June 27, 2005 memos, the NPDES Coordinator's June 27, 2005, memo,
and the City ArborisYs September 3, 2002, and April 3 and May 21, 2003, and April 13,
2007 memos shall be met;
7. that any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to have a City grading
permit, be overseen by the project arborist, inspected by the City Arborist, and be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District and with all the requirements of the permit issued by BAAQMD;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 2
8. that there shall be no heavy equipment operation or hauling permitted on weekends or
holidays during the development of Lot 10; use of all hand tools shall comply with the
requirements of the City's noise ordinance;
9. that as much employee parking as possible shall be accommodated on the site during
each of the phases of development; construction activity and parking shall not occur
within the redwood tree grove protective fencing on Lot 10;
10. that construction materials shall not be staged on Lot 9; all heavy equipment and
materials shall be staged along the right side of the property on Lot 10;
11. that at no time shall any equipment exceeding 18,000 LBS be allowed to be within 30
feet of the currently fenced off Redwood Tree Grove protection zone;
12. that prior to the placement or use of any motorized equipment within 30 feet of the
currently fenced Redwood Tree Grove protection zone, a protective layer of mulch one
foot deep with 3/4 inch plywood on top, shall be installed and inspected by the project
arborist to avoid further soil compaction of the area; post construction the protective
plywood and mulch may be removed as approved by the project arborist;
13. all construction shall be done in accordance with the California Building Code
requirements in effect at the time of construction as amended by the City of
Burlingame, and limits to hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame
Municipal Code;
14. that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the
interior noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA in
any sleeping areas;
15. that all new utility connections to serve the site, and which are affected by the
development, shall be installed along the right side property line to meet current code
standards and local capacities of the collection and distribution systems shall be
increased at the property owner's expense if determined to be necessary by the Public
Works Department and the location of all trenches for utility lines shall be approved by
the City Arborist during the building permit review and no trenching for any utility shall
occur on site without continual supervision of the project arborist and inspection by the
City Arborist;
16. that the new sewer connection to the public sewer main shall be installed along the
right side property line to City standards as required by the development;
17. that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed unless their removal is
determined by the City Arborist to have a detrimental effect on any existing protected
trees on or adjacent to the site;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 3
18.
19
20
21
that prior to being issued a demolition permit on the site, the property owner shall
submit an erosion control plan for approval by the City Engineer;
that prior to installation of any sewer laterals, water or gas connections on the site, the
property owner shall submit a plan for approval by the City Engineer and the City
Arborist;
that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be
required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards;
that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance;
22. that the project property
revisions to the proposed
the tree protection prog
construction;
owner shall obtain Planning Commission approval for any
house and/or accessory structure or necessary changes to
�am or to address new issues which may arise during
23. that should any cultural resources be discovered during construction, work shall be
halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the
Community Development Director and the recommendations of the expert have been
executed to the satisfaction of the City;
24. that the driveway shall be designed to be pervious material as approved by the City
Arborist, and installed according to approved plans with the supervision of the project
arborist and regularly inspected by the City Arborist;
25. that the established root protection fencing shall be inspected regularly by the City
Arborist and shall not be adjusted or moved at any time during demolition or
construction unless approved by the City Arborist; that the root protection fencing shall
not be removed until construction is complete on Lots 9 and 10, except if the portion of
the protective fence on Lot 9 in the area of the driveway may be removed to install the
driveway with the approval of the City Arborist; the removal of a section of the fence
should not disturb the maintenance irrigation system installed within the tree protective
fencing;
26. that the driveway on Lot 10 shall be constructed of pavers set in sand, with a
maximum cut below grade of 10 inches and a base compaction determined by the
project arborist and approved by the City Arborist; that if any roots greater than � 2
inches in diameter are encountered during grading for the driveway on Lot 10 and
must be cut to install the driveway, the situation shall be documented by the project
arborist and approved by the City Arborist prior to cutting any roots; and that if at any
time the project arborist on site or the City Arborist feels the number of roots to be cut
to install the driveway on Lot 10 is significant, a stop work order shall be issued for the
site until the City Arborist determines whether it is necessary to relocate the driveway;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 4
27. that special inspections by the City Arborist, to be funded by the property owner, shall
include being on site during any demolition and grading or digging activities that take
place within the designated tree protection zones, including the digging of the pier
holes for the pier and grade beam foundation, and during digging for removal or
installation of any utilities; that the special inspections by the City Arborist shall occur
once a week or more frequently as required by the conditions of approval and shall
include written documentation by the project arborist that all tree protection measures
are in place and requirements of the conditions of approval are being met; that no
materials or equipment shall be stockpiled or stored in any area not previously
approved by the City Arborist; and that the City Arborist may also stop work for any
violation of the conditions related to the protection, conservation and maintenance of
trees on the site;
28. that under the observation of the City Arborist, all pier holes for the foundation shall be
hand dug to a depth of no more than 18 inches and the surface area around the hole
shall be protected as required by the City Arborist; that if any roots greater than 2
inches in diameter are encountered during the digging for the pier holes, the property
owner's on-site arborist shall call the City Arborist and determine how the pier shall be
relocated and the Building Department shall be informed of the change and approve
that the requirements of the building code are still met; and that if at any time during
the installation of the pier and grade beam foundations roots greater than 2 inches in
diameter must be cut, the situation must be documented by the project arborist and
approved by the City Arborist prior to the time the roots are cut;
29. that, based on root locations that will be determined by hand digging on the site, the
property owner shall submit a detailed foundation report and design for approval by the
Building Department and City Arborist to establish the bounds of the pier and grade
beam foundation and have it approved prior to the issuance of a building permit for
construction on the site; and that if at any time during the construction the pier
locations must be altered to accommodate a Redwood tree root, the structural
changes must be approved by the Building Department prior to the time any such root
is cut or damaged;
30. that the property owner shall submit a complete landscape plan for approval by the
City Arborist prior to a Building permit being issued to address the landscaping and
fence installation on the site, including plantings, irrigation, electricity, fences, retaining
walls and soil deposits on the site; installation of all landscape features shall be
overseen by the property owner's arborist and regularly inspected by the City Arborist,
including fence post holes; and work shall be stopped and plans revised if any roots of
2 inches in diameter or greater are found in post holes or any new landscape materials
added endanger the redwood trees;
31. that no fencing of any kind shall be allowed for the first 65'-0" along the side property
line between Lots 9 and 10;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 5
32. that for tree maintenance the property owner shall be responsible for maintenance of
the protected Redwood grove during demolition and construction work on the project
and for a 5-year post construction maintenance program for the Redwood trees and
their root structure on the site, including deep root fertilizing, beginning upon final
inspection. This maintenance program shall be founded upon the recommendations of
the April 28, 2003 Mayne Tree Company report as well as such additional
recommendations as the property owner shall receive from a certified arborist; and that
the property owner of record shall submit a report from a certified arborist to the
Planning Department that discussed the health of the trees and any recommended
maintenance on the trees or other recommended actions on the property no later than
one year after the completion of construction (issuance of an occupancy permit) on the
project and every two years thereafter for a period of 5 years;
33. that the property owner shall deposit with the City $118,780 based on the appraisal of
the value of the four Redwood trees accepted by the City Arborist and City Attorney on
Lots 9 and 10, as security to the City against one or more of the Redwood trees dying
as the result of construction or within 5 years of the completion of construction due to
problems attributable to construction; these funds shall be available to the City Arborist
to cover any necessary removal costs, cover any unperformed maintenance or other
corrective activities regarding the grove of Redwood trees; nothing in this condition is
intended to limit in any way any other civil or criminal penalties that the City or any
other person may have regarding damage or loss of trees;
34. that for purposes of these conditions the project arborist is a certified arborist hire by
the property owner/developer; a certified arborist means a person certified by the
International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist;
35. that before issuance of any demolition or building permit, the property owner shall
record a deed restriction on the lot identifying the four (4) key Redwood trees and
providing notice to the heirs, successors, and assigns that these trees were key
elements of the development of the lot and:
a. The trees may cause damage or inconvenience to or interfere with the
driveways, foundations, roofs, yards, and other improvements on the property;
however, those damages and inconveniences will not be considered grounds for
removal of the trees under the Burlingame Municipal Code;
Any and all improvement work, including landscaping and utility service, on the
property must be perFormed in recognition of the irreplaceable value of the trees,
must be done in consultation with a certified arborist, and if any damage to the
trees occurs, will result in penalties and possible criminal prosecution;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 6
36. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire
Codes, 2001 Edition or the edition approved by the City and as amended by the City of
Burlingame at the time a building permit is issued;
37. that before any grading or construction occurs on the site, these conditions and a set
of approved plans shall be posted on a weather-proofed story board at the front of the
site to the satisfaction of the Building Department so that they are readily visible and
available to all persons working or visiting the site;
38. that if work is done in violation of any requirement in these conditions prior to obtaining
the required approval of the City Arborist, and/or the Building Division, work on the site
shall be immediately halted, and the project shall be placed on a Planning Commission
agenda to determine what corrective steps should be taken regarding the violation;
39. that the Redwood Tree Grove Protective Fencing shall be maintained during
construction on Lot 10, and this Redwood Tree Grove Protective Fencing shall not be
temporarily altered, moved or removed during construction; no materials, equipment or
tools of any kind are to be placed or dumped, even temporarily, within this Redwood
Tree Grove Protective Fencing, the protective fencing and protection measures within
the fencing shall remain in place until the building permit for each development on Lots
9 and 10 has received an occupancy permit and the City Arborist has approved
removal of the protective fencing;
40. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction on Lot 10, the property
owner shall install a locked gate in the Redwood Tree Grove Protective Fencing for
inspection access to the protected area in order to determine on going adequacy of
mulch, soil moisture and the status of other field conditions as necessary throughout
the construction period; this area shall be accessed only by the project arborist, City
Arborist, or workers under the supervision of these professionals;
41. that the property owner shall maintain throughout construction a three-inch thick layer
of well aged, course wood chip mulch (not bark) and a two-inch thick layer of organic
compost spread over the entire soil surface within the Redwood Tree Grove Protective
Fencing; installation of the wood chip and compost shall be accomplished by a method
approved by the project arborist and City Arborist; installation of the wood chip and
compost shall be supervised by the project arborist and the City Arborist; the project
arborist shall inform the City Arborist of the timing of installation of the course wood
chip mulch and organic compost so that observation and inspection can occur;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 7
42. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction on Lot 10, the property
owner shall ensure maintenance of the supplemental irrigation system of
approximately 250 feet of soaker hoses attached to an active hose bib, snaked
throughout the entire area on Lots 9 and 10 within the Redwood Tree Grove Protective
Fencing; irrigation must be performed at least once every two weeks throughout the
entire construction period for all three lots unless determined not to be necessary by
the project arborist and City Arborist; this area shall be soaked overnight, at least once
every two weeks, until the upper 24-inches of soil is thoroughly saturated; the City
Arborist shall periodically test the soil moisture to ensure proper irrigation;
43. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction on Lot 10, the property
owner shall ensure maintenance of at least four (4), 8-inch by 11-inch laminated
waterproof signs on the Redwood Tree Grove Protective Fencing warning that it is a
"Tree Protection Fence", "Do Not Alter or Remove" and in the event of movement or
problem call a posted emergency number;
44. that the Redwood Tree Grove Protective Fencing on Lot 10 shall be regularly
inspected by the project arborist and City Arborist during construction on Lot 10;
violation of the fenced areas and/or removal or relocation of the fences shall cause all
construction work to be stopped until possible damage has been determined by the
City Arborist and the property owner has implemented all corrective measures and
they have been approved by the City Arborist; and
45. that before issuance of a building permit, the property owner shall deposit $7,500 with
the Planning Department to fund, on an hourly basis, the City Arborist inspections as
required in the conditions of approval of all construction and grading on Lot 10 to
insure that the mitigation measures included in the negative declaration and the
conditions of approval attached to the project by the Planning Commission action are
met; and
a. that the property owner shall replenish by additional deposit by the 15`h of each
month to maintain a$7,500 balance in this inspection account to insure that
adequate funding is available to cover this on-going inspection function; and
b. that failure to maintain the amount of money in this account by the 15`h of each
month shall result in a stop work order on the project which shall remain in place
until the appropriate funds have been deposited with the City; and
that should the monthly billing during any single period exceed $7,500 a stop
work order shall be issued until additional funds to replenish the account have
been deposited with the city so inspection can continue; and
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Amendment to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Design
Review, Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits.
1537 Drake Avenue, Lot 10
Effective July 19, 2007
Page 8
d. that should the city be caused to issue three stop work orders for failure to
maintain the funding in this arborist inspection account, the property owner shall
be required to deposit two times the amount determined by the City Arborist to
cover the remainder of the inspection work before the third stop work order shall
be removed; and
e. that the unexpended portion of the inspection deposit shall be returned to the
property owner upon inspection of the installation of the landscaping and fences,
irrigation system and approval of the five year maintenance plan/ program for the
portion of the Redwood tree grove on the lot; and
that this same account may be used for the City Arborist's selected licensed
arborist inspector on lot 10 selected by the City Arborist and approved by the
Community Development Director.
ROUTIlv� FORM
DATE:
Monday March 31, 2003
TO: _City Engineer
_Chief Building Offiicial
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
�City Arborist
_City Attorney
FROM: Pla�nning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for mitigated negative declara.tion, design review, conditional use permit for re-
emerging lots, and special permit for two attached �arages for three new two-story houses
at 1537 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026-033-030 .
STAFF REVI�W: Monday, March.31, 2003
�%i / /��o ��.�-LG /`l�i/1�rr/2�S �'7L f�%�-�� /��l���S
� Ics S �i.�c� � ��S � /�� �'� '`C�-� � G o ,
C y �/��/o.�
�� ���« ����
�.
C��
,��
,��� .� �� �.�;�.d--�� ,�,�����
d B: `� Date of Comments: y 3 6�
Reviewe y
ROUTING FORM
DATE: August Zb, 2002
TO: _Ciry Engineer
Chief Building O£ficial
Fire Marshal
�Recycling Specialist
�City Arborist
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for atta.ched garage for a new, two-story
single family dwelling at 1537 Drake Avenue (A), zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-030
a;,.,r� d �'B 1
STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 26, 2002
��/'?� G67�����G�'� S /p" 5 ��2�-✓C 6 ✓ S '�- .. .
. � Comments: � S ° a
Rev�ewed $y: Date of
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CITY ARBORIST
DATE: 5/21/03
TO: Planning Dept./Erika
FROM: Steven Porter
RE: 1537 Drake Ave.
Erika, since receiving the latest Arborist Report from Mayne Tree Co. (4/28/03), I have inspected
the site, evaluated the Arborist Report and have reviewed changes in the building plans. I have
determined the following:
I am satisfied that the conditions we prepared for Mr.Miller, (Planning Dept. Memo 4/23/03),
have been met with in the latest Arborist Report from Mayne Tree Co.. The findings in this
teport are accurate and I am personally confident that if all of the tree protections listed in the
report are followed by Mr. Miller, and lus contractors, that this proj ect can go forwazd as planned
without significant short or long term harm to the irees in question.
With regard to the Arborist Report, submitted by Mrs. Gazcia, (Bazrie Coate, 4/9/03). This report
appears to cite standard, general tree protection guidelines. I believe this report was done
without any actual prior site specific field analysis. Although accurate, the report does not
address remedial efforts available when the general guidelines are sometimes violated. The
Mayne Tree Co. report, on the other hand, is based on actual "hands on" field inspection of the
specific site and situation. In this report, it appears that there will be no violation of general tree
protection guidelines and that the construction methods to be used will cause minimal tree root
damage and will be well under the critical 50% root mass loss formula.
However, the Mayne Tree Co. Report has cited an additional important issue: "Af�er
construction, installation of landscaping, irrigation, electricity, retaining walls, etc. can .have
more impact to trees than the construciion itself. I recommend having �he landscape plans
discussed with the architect and the arborist. This may be a further help to keeping these trees
healthy." I agree with this recommendation......sp
Mar 13 07 12:57p MILLER DEVELOPEMENT 6503408435 p.3
�civo�vr intt �4:tu r'e►,i, CSU593�94a MAYATE TREE EXPERTS �0 �002
'♦ .
�� � ��
- :�
'� �1• "'+�f� r. ..
IViayne Tree Exgert Campa�iy, �n�c.
. r:s rAaus�tt� i��i - s�rn�t cv►v►��nc: �vR^s �crxvse Na. x7e��s
GR,0.IKJA7'E F4XE5TER • C'kfCf1F]�l� AItF30K15�:S • PF_ST CQNTFiOL • ADV350R5 AND OI'GIih70It5
tt t(: Fl Akci) L. Ht IHI7NGTON 53S [iRAGATO RdAD. SYE. A
�+�u��iDerrr SaNCARt.I]S. CA 94070-b2Zt
KF.V[N N. 1Ci�L: 'Y TL•LLPF�ONG: (b54) 593-4460 -
��I�i:ltn't7ANSMAN0.GER ��ry $r Z�7 FA(;$IMll.ti: {fa50} S9.'5-4443
L•MAFL• intoCir�mayneicr.�.wm
I�tr. Cri�o Mlter
I?0�. BOx 121
E3s.�rlingame, CA 94011
�a�r Mr. Mdler,
�; 1537 DEtAKE AVE. (LQFS 9&�0), BURLII�AME
�rhis Iet�r is m relterate past site plan reviews and soif testir�g for mc�s. Qn Mard� i,
.?004, nre tcested for raohs at �eral proposed piPr hole locatians. Results and
�:andusi�ns are in my misda6ed re#�ort of F�ebruary 4, z00�. (�t shoufd have been dated
harch a, 2�04.) A pf� hale diagr�m was irtiduded in 1Natt Levisvn's repart. ,
# h�ad reviewed the landscape plans �repar�i by M� Michael C�Ik�n and r�ported my
-�piniOnS i�1 rny 5ep�ember i8� 2006, repoK. There is eSsentially na change in Mr.
�Ilan's February 5, 20Q7, tC� 10 land9cdpe pl�n.
[, th�r'�fore, cio nat find problems, �her than aEready stated in past reparts. wit�
�roposed dev�lapment and impacts tv the r�dwood grove. I thin k a!! potent�al areas af
mpacts have I�een addr+�ssed, i.e. inundations, r�rlu�etinrays, arui I�mdsr�ping.
�a,aerely,
������� ,
��� x ��� �
Ricftard L HUntingbc�n
�ertitl8d AI'borlst WE �p119A
:efi�'ied Fflrester-�1925 - ------�---- ._.__. _ _. -------
�U�i:pmd
RECEIVED
MAR 1 3 2007
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc.
ESTABLISHED 1931 STATE CONTRACTOR"S LICENSE N0. 276793
GRADUATE FORESTER • CERTIFIED ARBORISTS • PEST CONTROL • ADVISORS AND OPERATORS
RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON
PRESIDENT
KEVIN R. KIELTY
OPERATIONS MANAGER October 19� 20�6
Mr. Otto Miller
Miller Development
P.O. Box 121
Burlingame, CA 94011
Dear Mr. Miller,
SITE: 1537 DRAKE AVE., BURLINGAME (LOTS 9& 10)
535 BRAGATO ROAD, STE. A
SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6228
TELEPHONE: (650) 593-4400
FACSIMILE: (650) 593-4443
EMAIL: info@maynetree.com
R�CEIVED
NOV 0 � 2006
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PIANNING DEPT.
On October 16, 2006, we met at the above site along with the Burlingame arborist, Mr.
Steve Porter, and the project foreman, Mr. CIifF Raines. The reason for this meeting was
to discuss potential impacts to the existing redwoods from proposed construction.
Each lot will have its own set of potential impacts from excavation for driveways,
utilities, and stump removal. Each lot will be addressed separately with
recommendations to help mitigate potential impacts.
LOT 10:
This is tF�e north lot and north of the redwoods. Lot utifities are proposed to go along
the north side well outside the driplines of the redwoods, about 30 feet away. This will
have little or no impacts to any of the redwoods.
Lot 10 has an old tree stump in the middle, north of the redwoods. A tractor can pull
out this stump if it is pulled northward, away from the redwoods, with the tractor north
of the stump. This will significantly reduce potential impacks to any redwood roots.
LoT 9:
This lot is south and west of the redwoods. Potential impacts at this time are from the
proposed driveway and utility trenching. The utility trench is to go along the south
property line, about 30 feet from the redwoods. There will be little or no impacts.
The more critical area will be excavation for the driveway. A standard driveway profile
requires 10 inches of materials, i.e. rock, sand, pavers. To determine how deep
driveway excavation can safely go before hitting roots, a trench, 18 to 20 inches deep,
was dug along the north ecfge of the proposed driveway.
1537 Drake Ave. (lots 9& 10), Burlingame - 2-
October 19, 2006
A trench was dug from the sidewalk westward to the northeast front corner of the
proposed garage. The nearest redwood is about 15 feet away. Roots 2 tnches in
diameter and larger were not cut and their diameters and locations were noted.
Diameters were taken at the north edge of the trench and their depths were taken at
the south side of the trench. The distance to the nearest redwood is at least 20 feet
except for root #5, which is about 15 feet.
Five roots were found in the upper 12 inches of the trench. Root numbers are from
east to west and diameters were estimated using a tape measure.
Root # Diameter (inches) Depth (inches)
1 2.75 10
2
3
4
5
2.00
2.50
3.0
7.00
9
11
9
12
The large woody growth (see photograph) from a redwood root has been exposed. It is
somewhat loosely attached and will break or cut off easily without damage to the tree.
During exposure of the woody growth, a 7-inch root was found, root #5, which is 12
inches below the existing grade.
To conclude, the depth of driveway excavation depends on the shallowest root(s).
These are #2 and #4, which are 9 inches deep. I think a 7-inch cut could be done
without encountering large roots. A littie deeper cauld be done near the exisfing
sidewalk where the driveway is to start. This appears to then allow for a gradual raise
up to the garage.
Please call with any questions. I think this report is accurate and is based on sound
arboriculturdl principles and practices.
Sincerely,
,1��-��--'� IV 7Fi�� .
� �_ �� ,y� �
��
Richard L. Huntington
Certified Arborist WE #0119A
Certified Forester #1925
RLH: pmd
S��`ETY Of qR
���P� � � HUNT�ycB����'�
_ �'�� �y �
� � �o. WE.p119A �
, *
�5�
�F9TiFlFo AR��/
.. - ,� , �-�-� -
_ �, _ � " ,�
' � ' � i,, ,� -�'` , � �a� r �� � °�--x
� �
�r g� x�� � ;f s. _ �. ' -�r �
t" � � af � �''" �,
•m.a � i � �,...���l,,� � f �'�"� ,� I�,f _�{{, $,�a� _'7�
� . b' � P �} i'� �_.n- ., ,+E � K"� S �S" � . . ` :
_ � i � � � _� ' `� 1�1`�; �i r t � , �� � ���� w i �� � ' ;�,
} $� ..' `�=� . � �Y � ' J 1 � i 9 �d:'P�,., 1 . . !&r "� � � S �.
.:,,, � � - ' Y ? �Xr'�.��.�� _ ►� '� �'� �' g-- .e, , 7� �.N 3 ��'x` �'�.;
a .�d. �` � ,i� � . ' 3 7 �i . F � 3 >i r �,�, _ `�F d
-Y * k- �..'��- � 3 � �rsi ;3 F, !,� i,f i'�„�'�C�.p '. ��� -
k^�71,��'�1'`s"" l.. `f ._ ' :� �'' �t.,�,�J ' �. �.x� 4 t z�'� �=`# �,�` '
e/
. t' �'i�, r , � rt (� r �Y � �xs� �� �� `�, w f n �,t� m� } t
ia, � '• . . . � �. � .�M��_- � �Y :4•fg t �# F �- „
! � ' ; Y 1
7 ;.... r.� r+a+.� t Q �� ,,. �` � 1� � � a� � �' r#*:''' F,
' � '� , � .�F* x'� ^� 'k � �} .� ; .
j:' = * v �.. . . ' � �f �`n ' �' w r, ..� "! , .. �y �. '�'tg`c. �'� _ �M,r� h *,� .. ..
��'� , �. � � � ' L� . �''� �
,�7:a __�f� ,�F �:� v��F c `Tt'
�^'r� �: f � � _ • r
:.t `
- �. ���' , � ; y� �". : f .. � : ,,
, _.. � � � ,�-?. a � � �4�� _ �! �� �, ; �
i ;;� t' . _ � . r ,> ' r `��
;� _�r�w�'°" ` ' '' _ �:_ ' �, }
� ., i , . � �;
, � � .
� £ f�� �
� �� � 4r
,A'°'"�,iX` `� � _ � ` . ' .,�. �.� r [ .4- r
�,��}.� f , r. � �. Y� `
.. �.�nn � r 9 'I,� �,.atr,} , �, � � �' ..+ ;� � �-" , i
'n @
� �. �f � �y'� �d �, .. , �._ C h: ���� i i.ea l�
3 y § �
�� ��n . ,i`��: , '� �" . .��,, �,,.;. �",,,, ;,� � ,�;� � ��. '� °
' � . fti , ��;,,. �
5� �'. � -r�'-a'" .� i2 � � �� � �� � ..� fil S:�a�w .
, � hn , . � 1L. � . : � r . .
' �✓�` =�m�.:�s � � _ ' -� , . _ . ' „s,�a .F E � :�� �� � ,'
�� s�
'. . .� ��-. �� �� . T � .� r;a '� � �p s
1- �
• r
,. ... � � s.y Fk, �: 's .� �/�'.,4.: . .. a � ���� � � ` k' `
� - • :yay.. ! .� :.l... ' E �;� �v G — _. , f. �yµ ��
..._. ' P � - r'. � '.
. • . � w�� ;. ��,�� a r^L: .i -.. . . . _ -. _ ' . v�''�r
�
` , �
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 15, 2007
[� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
❑ Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for amendment to mitigated negative
declaration, design review, conditional use permit for emerging lots,
and special permits for building height and declining height envelope
to construct a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached
garage at 1537 Drake Lot 10, zoned R-1.
Staff Review:
A property boundary survey shall be performed by a licensed land
surveyor/engineer. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities.
2. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage.
3. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
4. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 06/18/2007
�,� Project Comments
�
Date:
June 17, 2005
To: r� City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
� City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new,
two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1537 Drake
Avenue, Lot 10, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-270
Staff Review:
All previous comments still apply. In addition, backwater protection certification is
also required.
Reviewed by: V V ��'� �
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Date: 6/27/2005
Pfe� i oJS C.aw�►+� cw'�5
MEMO UM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Apri18, 2002
To: Planning Department
From: Vic or Voong, Enginee ' .
Subject: � Drake Avenue
��� .
The Engineenng Division has received several letters regarding the sewer mains on Drake
Avenue. We are aware of the problem that occurred in this area last year. To solve this problem,
the City reconstructed four laterals that had problems and removed tree roots from the sewer
mai.n.
The existing sewer does not have any capacity problems, however it had tree roots which caused
obstruction of flows in the sewer main. Due to the shallow depth of the sewer main in the street,
properties with plumbing fixtures below the street level have to install a bacl�low valve in theu
private property to prevent any possible back up of sewage.
The City has removed the tree roots from the sewer main, however these tree roots will
eventually grow back causing problems. Therefore ttus sewer main is on the City list of frequent
maintenance azeas to keep free from tree roots.
U.IVICTOR\ProjedslPrivate\1537Urake.wpd
�; c�Tx
�
e!�'��
.. • �.
�s,wnir
�
PLASJNING DEPART'ME1�T N1EM0
TO: Engineering- Syed Murtuza and Donaid Chang
FROM: Erika Lewit, Planning
RE:
� DATE:
1537 Drake
F�c��iLra
Please review the following information and submit yottT written comments to me by S:OOp.m.
on Monday, June 3, 2002. �
� Tharik You, Erika
_ �,�c�(�Q —�►—� � ' '�� ���—
� �� � o�- --1�.�.e I��� � �c'`'"`— �i (�.�-�-Q
- j i � 1 ws�°�-%avv- , ��c �tv
� �j wYlbNi� `� . �
MEMOR:AND�JM
PUBI,IC WORKS DEPARTMENT
�O: PL�NNING D�
FROM: CITY ENGINE]
DATE: JiTNE 4, 2002
.SUBJECT: 1537 Drake Avenue Residential devetopment project
� Staff has reviewed the information submit#ed by L�izuriaga Taylor Inc. pertaining ta patential
environmeutal impacts and mitigations for the project. Following comments sh�ll-i�e addressed
� by the project developer prior to the planning commission approval:
a: � Pr.ovide Location Map of the proposed sewer bacl�low preveator installatioa with
addresses. (prior-to planning commission meeting)
b: Installation of sewer back,�low preventor device is the responsibility of a private property
owner. A plumbing permit is required from the City's Building Division prior to the
� installation of backflow preventor device(s). �
C: Siibmit sewer flow monitoring results with graphs of peak and average flows with dates �
� and times of monitoring as a supporting doaument to the sewer flow calculations:(prior to �
planning commission meeting)
d: Provide a clear conceptual drawing of water line installatioa showing the limits of pipe
replacement,lenEgth, valves, and si7e. (prior to planning commission �a���?
e: A detail design drawing and specifications shall be submitted for City EngiQeer's approvai
prior to the issuance of Building Permit. An eucroachment permit is required for the
construction� of water line.
f: Revise the `Construction Operatioa_Plan' to provide a note saying that `No construction
equipment.parking and or construction workers parking be allowed on the street'. (prior
to planning commission meeting)
g: Provide a note.oa the `Construction Operatioa Plan for perimeter construction fence to be
ei�ected to prevent construction debris escaping �nto adjacent properties. (prior to planning
commission meeting)
�h: Project construction shall comply with the City's construction hours and noise ordinance_
Fde: S:�A Pubiic Worlcs IJicx6orylAudwr. BY NamelSyed Mucwu I.emecs11537 Ihate Are memo.�vpd .
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DONALD CHANG, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
DATE: AUGUST 15, 2002
SUBJECT: Sewer Backup Problem at 1500 Block of Drake Avenue
This is to respond to the concerns raised by the public during a June 24`� Planning Commission
meeting regarding the existing sewer system at 1500 block of �r�iic� Avenue. The applicant has
conducted a sewer study recently and the sewer flow monitoring results showed that the existing
pipe size is not a problem. The sewer backup problem was the result of the tree-root intrusion,
sags in the pipe, and the age of the pipe.
The City has taken the following immediate measures to remedy the problem:
Placed this line on the Monthly Frequent Maintenance Program. The Sewer Department
will clean this line monthly beginning September to clean the grease and debris.
Treat this line with chemical foam for tree-root control. In August, 2002, a Ciry contractor
will inject chemical foam into the sewer main to kill the tree roots within the pipelines.
This treatment will prevent root intrusion for the next 2 years.
The City will conduct a study of the line to analyze the problems and come up with a long term
solution. Once a feasible solution is developed a cost estima.te v�-i�' be prepared and this project
will be inciuded into fhe next year capital improvement program subject to City Council's
approval.
C: George Bagdon, Syed Murtuza, Phil Scott, Phil Monaghan, V'ince Falzon, Victor Voong
s:►n r„bu� wo� D�ry�� coa��a�isoo ��r n�o
ROUTING FORM
DATE: August 5, 2Q02
TO: �City Engineer
_Cluef Building Official
� F'ire�Mars6al
,_RecycL'ng SpeciaL'st
� City Arborist
�_City Attorney -
FROM:_ Planniag Staff
SUBJECT: . Request for design review and special permit for attached garage for a new two-story single
family.dwelling at 1537 Drake Avenue (A), zoned R 1, APN: 026-033-030 .
STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 5, 2002
� •: : � �;�
Reviewed By: V�� = Date of Comments: �� �
DATE:
TO:
ROUTING FORM
August 5, 20U2
�Cifiy Engineer .
Cluef Building Official
� F'ire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_City Arborist
City Attorney
FROM: � Planning Staff .
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new�wo-story single family dweiling and detached garage
at 1537 Drake Avenue (B), zoned R 1, APN: 026-033-030 .
STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 5, 20Q2
� �,� � ' '4
�
0
Reviewed By: v� U` Date of Comments: gt �`��
■
� PZ7Bi.IC WORK.S �EPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
� � . PLANNIN� REVIEW COIVIII�IyTS � t.(� sit�f�� � . .
. . � Project Name� D�u��
-ProjectAddress:_�� 'G�'�� �
The %llo ' requir�ments apply to the project .
-� 1� A properly. bounilary sorvey shall be Qc�eformeci by a licensed land
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property comers,
.. � easeme,nts, topograplucal features and utilities. (Required .prior to the
. . builiiing permit iss�iance.) _
2 � X The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should .be made to
drain towar�s � the Frontage S�et. (Required prior to the building permit
� � - issu�nce.) �
� 3.- � .. The applic,�nt shali submit project grading and drainage plans for
. approval prior to: the iss.uance of�a Building permi� �
4 � � The project site�is in a flood �one, the project sball comply with the City's
� flood zone requirements.
5 -_�. �A sanitary sewer lateralfi�t is required for the pmject in accordauce with
the �ity's �taridands: (Required.prior to the building�permit issuance.)
6. The project plans shall show the required Bay&ont BikelPed�sirian tr�il
and .necessary public access improvements as required by San Fraacisco
� Bay Conservation and TSevelopment Commission.
7: Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the projec� The sewer analysis
� - shall identify the pmjecYs impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures.
8 � Svbmit trafft� trip generation analysis for the piojec�.
�: 9. - Submit a traffic impact s�tudy for the proj+ect. 'Ihe traffc sludy should.
. �� identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation
� me,asures to be adopted `by the project to be approved by the CiEy
' _ Engineer.
10. � The project shall 51e a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Divisioa The parcet map shall show all existing properly tines, easemeats,
- � montiments, and new�property and lot lines proposed by the map.
. . � . _ � Page 1 of 3
U:�private developmenttPLANNII�TG REVIEW C30NIIulENTS.doc
� --
P`UB�iC WORKS DEPARTMENT �1�TGINEERING DIVISION
11_ A-la�st preiiminary tide report of the subjed parcel of land shall be
s�bmitted to the Public Works Fngineering Division with the parcel map
for reviev�s. �
lZ � . Map closurel.lot closure calculations shall be submitted witli the parcel
. maP-. . .
13 ��,._ �he project shall submit a condominium map ta the Engineering Divisions
in aoco�ce with the Iequirements of the Subdivision Map Ac�
14 � The. pro�ect shal� at its own cost, design and constn�ct frontage public
�� impro�ements including ciufi, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
i aPP�en�uX work.
15 � T6e project sha11, at�its own�c�st, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters � �poles;
.� tr+ees, �and streetlights in accordance with stneetscape. master plan. �
�6 . By the preliminary -review of Plans, it appears that the project may cause.
adverse iniipacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian tra�c
and public on sh+�et parking. The project shall identify tliese impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. . �
17 � Tiie project shall sutimit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engine�r -for the proposed creek � enclosure. The hydraulic .calculations
�_ must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adveise
� - -impact to hofh upstream and downstreain properties. The hydrologic
�.calculations shal,l accompaay a site map showing the azea of the i00-year
�flood and existing� improvements with proposed improvements. �
18 � Any work witbi� the drainage area; creek, or creek banks require.� a State
Department of Fish end �a�ne Pernut �nd �►rmy Corps of F�x��neers
Permits. -
lg No �onstruction debris shall be allovved into the creek.
'20 � The project shall compiy with the � City's I�PDES permit requirement �to
- � �. prevenf storm w�ter. pollution. - :
-- 21 �_ �he project does not show the dimensions of e�isting driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway ,zlimensions. ALSo clarify if the project is �
.. � proposing to widen the dri"veway. Any widening of the dnveway is subject
� � � ta City Engineer's approval. �
� 22� .'�C The. plans do not indicate the slope of the dri�eway, re-submit plans �
� sliowing the:drivearay profile. with elevations .
. - � Page 2 of 3
Ulpciyat�.developme�lPLANNING REY�EW COI4IINEN1'S.doc
_: " PUBLIC WORKS DEP�tTMENT ENG�TEERING DIVISION .
� . -
23 The back of_the dri�eway/sidewallc approach shall be at least 12".above
the $ow line" of the frontage curb in the sh+eet to prevent overflow of storm
wat�r fmm the street into private property.
24. . For dYe tal�eout service, a.garbage reeeptacle� shall �tre placed in fron�. The -
� sidewa�lc fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from eaoh side of the
P�P�Y- . . -
25.� For commer�ial.projeCts a designated garbage bin space and c�eaning area�
sha�l t�e located inside the building. A drain cona�cting the garbage area to
_. the Saaitary Sewer Systetn is required.
�r�, . �
�
,
� . Page 3 of 3
U�private developmentiPLANNING REVIE�V (70bII4iEN'I�.doc
MEMO UM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR'FMENT
August 30, 2002
To: Planning Department �
From: Victor Voong, n g Division
Subject: 1537 Drake Aven e
Staffhas reviewed the submittals received on August 21, 2002 and the following are
sapplemental comments in addition to tl�e previously made comments dated June 4, 2002;
1. Plans for the waterline in.stallation shall indicate the type of pipe to be used and method of
construction.
2. Sewer flow results did not show any capacity problems. Comment c dated June 4, 2002 is
acceptalile to the City.
3. Comments f, g and h dated June 4, 2002 are acceptable to the. City.
4. Plans currently show that straw rolls to be installed on the two sides of the property. Straw
rolls shall also be installed along the east side of the property which is common with Lot 9 to
prevent erosion onto adjacent properties.
5. All other previotxsly made comments still apply to this project.
UIVICTOR�Pr�ojedslPrivateN 537Drakellots9andf O.wpd
MEMO UM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
October 15, 2002
To: e
From: V ng, Engineeri.ng Division
Subject: 1537 e Avenue
Staff has reviewed the submittals dated on September.23, 2002 and the following are
supplemental comments in addition to all previously made comments; '
1. Project plans shall show details for how the new water line is to be connected to the existng
water lines, i.e., 45-degree bends. �
2. Utility notes shall be revised to indicate that new valves shall be made of brass with bronze
handles. �
3. Utility notes shall also include pressure testing of new water pipes at 225 psi for two hours
and five minute flush, and information regazding disinfection or chlorination of new pipes.
4. Although project plans currently show a 90-degree fitting at the intersecfion of the new pipes
in the easement azea, the text indicates a tee fitting. Plans shall indicate the proper fitting to
be installed. Plans shall also show water service connections for adjacent properties on Bernal
Avenue and Drake Avenue.
5. Project plans shall include two one-inch blowoffs behind the proposed valves at intersection
of new pipes in the easement area.
b. All other previously made coinments still apply to this projec�
U:IVICTOR1ProjedslPrivate\1537Drake\Lots9and10.wpd
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 15, 2007
d City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
❑ Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for amendment to mitigated negative
declaration, design review, conditional use permit for emerging lots,
and special permits for building height and declining height envelope
to construct a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached
garage at 1537 Drake Lot 10, zoned R-1.
Staff Review:
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
��� ���„���
��n� a � 2007
crr�r c�= �!;�;",��u�,r,��
PLANNING DEP'C,
Reviewed by: � _ /2L����
Date: / ��,� a �.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 17, 2005
❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
CI City Arborist
O City Attorney
O Recycling Specialist
m Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new,
two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1537 Drake
Avenue, Lot 10, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-270
Staff Review:
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide double backflow prevention.
3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by ��
Date: � ����/
Q
. - � _ (�}— � c�
ROUT�TG FORM _
' DATE: � August 5, 2�U2
TO: _City �ngineer
Chief Building (?fficial
. � - �Fire Marshal
Recycling. Spe�ialist
� City Arborist
. �_City Attorney
FItONi: � � Planning Staf�
SiJB.TECT: . Request for design review and special pemut for attaclieti garage for a new two-story single
� family dwelling at 153? Drake Avenue (A), zoned R 1, APN: 026-033-030 .
. ari� (8� �
- .�
STAFF REVIEW: Manda3r, August 5, 2002 � -
�C �/ � �cC.P�S q- f�...� � -�� a_� �....� ��` � y
�
� �
,
;,
.'
�
�eviewed.By: Date of Comments: :� .��—+t� �-.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 15, 2007
❑ City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
❑ City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
❑ Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
a Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
❑ NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
❑ City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for application for amendment to mitigated negative
declaration, design review, conditional use permit for emerging lots,
and special permits for building height and declining height envelope
to construct a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached
garage at 1537 Drake Lot 10, zoned R-1.
Staff Review:
1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame
Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements.
2) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
3) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed
Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be
issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
4) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must either confirm that the address is
1537 Drake or obtain a change of address from the Engineering Department. Note: The
correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans.
5) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential
buildings. Go to http://www.energv.ca.qov/title24 for publications and details.
6) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line.
7) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line.
8) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of one-
hour fire-rated construction and no openings are allowed.
9) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that
complies with the egress requirements.
10) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are
considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details
if your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
11) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
12) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
13) The fireplace chimneys must terminate at least two feet above any roof surface within ten feet.
Reviewed b ; : Date: � %(5 �� �
�
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 17, 2005
❑ City Engineer
X Chief Building Official
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new,
two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1537 Drake
Avenue, Lot 10, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-270
�—
Staff Review:
1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC),
the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal
requirements.
2) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
3) Provide a title block on the plans that includes the name of the owner(s) and
the name, address, and phone number of the project designer.
4) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must obtain a change of
address from the Engineering Department. Note: The correct address must be
referenced on all pages of the plans.
5) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the
property line.
6) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line.
7) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be
constructed of one-hour fire-rated construction and no openings are allowed.
8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window
or door that complies with the egress requirements.
9) Provide guardrails at all landings.
10)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than four risers.
11)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
12)The fireplace chimneys must terminate at least two feet above any roof
surface within ten feet.
Note: The previous building permit application for this project has expired. A new
building permit application must be submitted and a new plan check fee will be
collected.
Reviewed bv: �� / �C� �'" � / Date: / /„2..�/�s �'
Rov�rn�G Fox�
DATE:
August S, 2002
'I'L7: " City Engineer
�Cluef Building O[ficial
� - Fire Marsfial
— .-
Recycling Specialist
� City Arborist
. _City Attorney.
FR03VI: Planning Staf�
.��1
L�� � �
SUBJEGT: Request for design review f�r a�ew twb-st�ry single family dwelling and detached garage
at 1537 Drake Avenue (B), zoned R i, APN: 026-033-030 .
S"�AFF RE�W: Monday, August S; 2002 -
Project Comments
Date:
June 17, 2005
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
❑ City Arborist
d City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
X Recycling Specialist
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ NPDES Coordinator
Subject: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new,
two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1537 Drake
Avenue, Lot 10, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-270
Staff Review:
Applicant shall submit for approval a Waste Reduction Plan and
recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or
permitting.
Reviewed by: ,
��
Date: � _ a � — U.S
� ROUTIl�TG FORM
DATE: August 5, 2002
TO: � City Engineer
Chief Building Offiicial
Fire Marshal
�Recyclin� Specialist
� _City Arborist
_Cily Attorney
FROM: � Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-sto .ry single family dwelling and deiacined garage
at 1537 Drake Avenue (B), �oned R-1, APN: 026=033-030 .
Q�. C��
sT� xEv�w: Monaay, Au�t s, Zoo2
� � ��- r Q� � ('.�`,(��
�� y � � ' � ����
� .
� �.
c��,.�-�— � ��` ``'""�-
- �'
���� �
��, . �.� --�'i— •
� �
�� -[ r_ � �/! � [ �
� CZ� r � Z�", Q
v
�� 4� � � � '
� �
` Date of Comments: ��Z �"�c� -2--
Reviewed By: T ,
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 17, 2005
� City Engineer
� Chief Building Official
� City Arborist
� City Attorney
� Recycling Specialist
� Fire Marshal
✓ NPDES Coordinator
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new,
two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1537 Drake
Avenue, Lot 10, zoned R-1, APN: 026-033-270
--�.�
Staff Review: 06/27/05
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City
NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited
to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices
(BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the
construction project (including demolition).
Ensure that sufficient amount of erosion and sediment control measures are
available on site at all times.
The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging and/or
storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times.
Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available
for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project
proponents.
For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727.
Reviewed by: � a
Date: 06/27/05