The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16 Davis Court - ResolutionRECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2006-038106 01:01 pm 03/16/06 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 9 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-Caunty Clerk-Recorder III'�I �II�� III'� Ili►1 I!��i II'i� I�'ll �!�'li' II!I! ��I!i II'i'I I�illl IIII!I II IIII * 2 0 0 6 0 0 3 8 1 0 5 A R* RESOLUTION NO. 012-2006 16 DAVIS COURT: APN:025-181-010 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, riue and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. i' Date: 3/ 10/2006 �-�� Margaret Monr , City lanner � RESOLUTION 012-2006 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi review and a special permit for an attached ��e at 16 Davis Court, zoned R-1, Andrew Jurow and Barbie Barrett, pro,p,ertv owners, APN: 025-181-010; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 13, 2006, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1- (e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman IK��t-l�;�- I, �(�Jrl Q(�,(, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Vistica, Terrones NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review and special permit. 16 Davis Court Effective February 23, 2006 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent date stamped January 10, 2006, sheets P1, P2 and P4 and date stamped January 30, 2006, sheets P3 and P5, with a single garage door that has the appearance of 3 separate doors and a dormer in the new attached garage, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first floor, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 5. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's and the City Engineer's November 29, 2005 memos, and the Fire Marshal's, the NPDES Coordinator's, and the Recycling Specialist's December 5, 2005 memos shall be met; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and -2- EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review and special permit. 16 Davis Court Effective February 23, 2006 10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Dischazge Control Ordinance. -3-