Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Permit (2) - for review p4-6�. 4 ���r; _ � ��.s,� �,�r..; � � .g� p; 0 4�� y� `��� �, y '��y� � � � , � �;, � , ..�v� r ���r��� }{ �'a + ��. Y Y !� 0 ��te C�it� �f ��zrit�t��tme SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAO � • � BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 TEI:(al5) 342-893� February 5, 1980 Mr. Ted David Ajluni 1627 Van Buren Street San Mateo, CA. 94403 Dear Mr. Ajluni: Since there was no apoeal to or suspension by the City Council, we ►�ish to advise the January 28, 1980 Planning Commission approvai of your special p�rmit application became effective February 5, 1980. This application was to allow operation of a sandwich deli in the M-1 District at 1530 Rollins Road. The January 28, 1980 minutes of the Planning Commission state the permit was approved with the following conditions: (1) that the permit be aoproved to Mr. Ted David Ajluni, and be nontransferable; (2) that the size and location of the sandwich deli be consistent with that aoproved in March, 1979; (3) that not more than 7 4ables/44 seats be available for customer use; (4) that the hours of operation not exceed 7:00 A.M. to 3:30 P.h1.; and (5) that on-site parking available for tt�e deli's cusiomers be reviewed in one year, and this dermit be subject to possible modifications at that time. Any site improvements or construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. JRY/s cc: City Clerk Chief Building Inspector License Collecior Sincerely, ,..��. �--� John R. Y st City P1� er Prooerty Owner: Rollins Road Industrial Enterprises Assessor's Office, Redwood City (Lots 35, 36, 37, Biock 9, Millsdale Industrial Park #5; APN 025-272-120) . Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 January 28, 1980 Discussion included: the proposed parking and code requirements; the noise factor involved and possible mitigation measures. Gilbert Alcala responded to some of the concerns, noting his business would be airport related and a support to the area; some of the body work would be for car rental agencies; the working bays would be located in the middle of the two bui1dings; that his company had several other sites for storage of vehicles and thus storage could be balanced. The applicants advised that the majority of the bocly repair work would be moved to Cowan Road and that cars being brought there would be stored inside the buildings. Mr. Alcala also discussed his attempts to find property elsewhere and noted several companies doing some type of re�air wor•k in this area at present. (Comrr�ission pointed out that most of the cases cited ���ere ancillary services to the primary business.) Commission concerns: increased traffic; the noise factor; the desirability of this use at this location in lighi of past Council/Commission discussions and decisions. One Corr�nissior�er expressed his approval of the move and objected to lii7�it�ing the number of personnel for this project to the available parking. C. Taylor cor�m,nted that he could not, ai; this time, support a major policy decision on the �roposed us.e. He, there�fore, moved to deny this application. Sccond C. Mink; motion to oieny ap�roved 5-1 on roll call vote, C. Sine dissenting. Appeal procedures were advised. 2. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPCRATE A SANDG�JICH DELI IN THE�M-1 DISTRICT AT 1530 ROLLINS ROAD Ifd TNE N-1 DISTRICI-, BY TED D. AJLUNI CP Yost revi et�red thi s appl i cati on to al 1 ow a ne��! owner -to operaie the exi sting sa�,d4-rich deli at 1530 Rollins Road. Reference st.af�i report dated lj?2./80; Decer��ber 16, 1979 lette�� ff,om Ted David Ajluni; letter in support from R. P. Lopes, vice president, Coen Co,l�pany, Inc., 1510 Rollins Road; Project Assess�;�ent for the previous ap�lication -- no chanc�e proposed; site drawing of Dino's Deli; and P1arch 26, �979 ('�lanning Commissioi� minutes appf�oving special perm-it at this locltion f;o Consta.ntine Tsavalas. Staff recoi>>mended approval with five conditions as lis�;ed i�� the staff report. Ted David Ajl�.mi, the applicant ���as present and corfirmed there would be no ma;ior chanyes in the ope���ation and that he �vould comply ��ith the City's conciitior�s of approval. Chm. Jacobs opened ti7e public hearing. 7here were no c�mments an�i t;he hearin� was closed. C. P1inl; moved f��r approval of this special per�mit t�ith the following coi�clitions: (1) t:hat the permit be apE�roved to Mr. Ted David Ajluni, and be nontransi�erable; (2) that the size and location of the sand!��ich deli be cons�istenf, bdltil Lha�; a.pproved in March, 1979; (3) that not more than 7 tables/�!4 seats be available for custorrl�Y'� use; (4) that tf�e hours of oreration not exceed 7:00 A.�1. to 3:30 P.M. ; and (5) tha�t on-site parking available for the deli's customers be revievded in one year, and this permit be subject to possible.modifications at that time. Second C. Harvey and approved 6-0 on roll call vote. Appeal procedur�es were aclvised. 3. SIGN EXCEPTIONS FOR 11 30' HIGN POLE SIGN F1ND 3'-�' HIGH GROUND SIGN ulIiH 209 SF OF COPY AT lO1.E CAROLAN AUFNUE, C3Y E3ELL ELECTiZICAL SIGNS FOR ARATA FIONDFI CP Yost revie�red this application fior two signs at the Honda showroom and ser•vice sl�ops no�v being cons.tructed at 101G Carolan Ati�enue. Reference staff report dated 1/2�/80; Si gn Excepti on appl i cati on fi led 1/10/80; draw�i i�c�s de�:,i cting the si c�ns and thei r locations. It was staff's opinion a 20' high �?ole sigr� at this site �vould provide reasonable advertising expc�s�ire �nd that applying a�.i�f:o rot�d signage standards in t►��is area would �c inconsistent. Denial �ti�as recommended. Burlingame Planning Comnission Minutes Page 3 January 28, 1980 David James Arata of Arata Honda was present and discussed his need for this advertising. It was his contention, given �he nature of his business and his 23' high building, that he would require a sign higher than 20'. Chm. Jacobs the public hearing. Forrest Lee of Bell Electrical Signs spoke in favor. He the proposed 30' sign would give better visibility, discussed Honda's signage guidelines and compared this sign with nearby sign�ge. There were no further and the.public hearing was closed. new opened stated comments Considerable discussion ensued among Coiranission, staff, Mr. Arata and Mr. Lee including: the technicalities involved in reducin� tf�e proposed signage; the need for visibility. Concerns: the 30' height of the pole sign; the effect of this sign on the nearby residential area; and a difficulty in making the findings necessary for sign exception approval. Mr. Arata advised this sign�ge was the only signage proposed for the building, that the sign would be intern�lly lignted and discussed hours oi' illumination with Cornmission. He then proposed that he be allowed a 23' siyn. After further discussion, C. Harvey moved that the sign exception application for a 30' high pole sign be denied, Second C. Sine and approved 6-0 on roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 4. TE�dTATIVE PARCEL f�AP TO AMEND THE ORIGINAL BOUiVDARY BETt��EEN LOTS 5 An1D 6, BLOCK 29, TOL�'N OF BURLINGP,ME AT 117/119 AND 125 CLARENDON E�OAD, IN 7flE R-1 DISTRICT, BY ROY W. QYERS AND ROLAND A. RAVE��S CE Ki rkup revi euled �:hi s appl i cai:i on to redi vi de ttti�o 1 ots whi ch ►��ere devel oped with thr�e houses, the third house located over the property line. The proposal �ti�ould create a new property line, le�ving two buildinqs on one lot and one �uilding on the other lot. If approved, staff recon����nded two conditions as listed in the Assis�;an� City Engineer's January 24, 1920 memo 4�hich was circulated to Conh��ission. Roy l�l. Byers, 1109 Southdown Road, Hills�orough, one of the applicants, was present. He advised the►�e were two ovaners and that they wished to sell one of the original lots. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. l�l�ere were no cornments and the public. hearing was closed. A concern was expressed regarding Fire Department access to the house at tf�e rear. C. Sine reported oi� his visit to the site i;hat afternoon and suggested that by approving this map Can�mission would be making a nonconforming structure legal. It was recommended tha�: the applicani remove the house at the rear. After fu►,ther discussion the applicani; agreed to tl�is suggestion. C. S-ine rnoved to deny this tentative parcel map. Second C. Mink. The Chair recognized C. Taylor who urged his fellow Co mnissioriers to vote against the motion in view of. the f�ousing shcrtage at the present time. P1otion �to deny a�proved 5-1 on roll call vote, C. Taylor dissenting. Recess 9:25 P.M.; reconvene 9:30 P.M. OTHER QUSINESS 5. REVIEW OF 1/22/79 SPECIAL PERMI7 TO OPERATE THE GURLINGAME EXECUTIVE SN�1CK BI�R AT 1�18 GILQRE7H ROAD, IN THE M-1. DIS7RICT, QY LLOYD RUSSFLL OF HAVA SNAI: FOOD SERVI INC. CP Yost reviewed i.his special permit granted in January, 1979, Commission actions and a recent site insnection by staff. Reference staff report dated 1/72/80; January 21, 1930 letter from Lloyd Russell, vice-president, f�ava Snak Food Ser�vice; Project Assessment for this project revised 1/17/79; site drawin� received Decernber 29, 1978;