The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About970 David Road - Staff Report0 City of Burlingame ITEM #� Special Permit for Storage of Construction Vehicles and Equipment Address: 970 David Road Meeting Date: 9/ 14/98 Request: Special Permit for storage of construction vehicles and equipment at 970 David Road, zoned M-1 (C.S. 25.44.030 (23)). Applicant: Howard Engineering APN: 025-272-160 Property Owner: Johnson Lee & Huang Li-Chen Lot Area: 4480 SF; 0.11 Acre General Plan: Industrial, Industrial & Ofiice Use Zoning: M-1 Adjacent Development: Warehouse and Industrial Uses CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1, operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing. Previous Use: Outdoor uncovered truck and equipment storage Proposed Use: Outdoor uncovered truck and equipment storage Allowable Use: Outdoor uncovered truck and equipment storage requires a special permit. History: In 1994, a special permit for outdoor truck storage was granted to the former owner of the site. On May 18, 1998, the City Council revoked this special permit because the applicant had failed to comply with the conditions of approval by adding a number of structures on the site. The property has since been sold, and Howard Engineering has now applied for a special permit to store construction vehicles and equipment on the site. Summary: The applicant, Joseph Howard, Howard Engineering, is requesting a special permit to allow storage of construction vehicles and equipment at 970 David Road, zoned M-1. The 4480 SF site is now partially paved with a gravel surface between the driveway and the storage area. The site is surrounded by a chain link fence with a wrought iron gate across the front. The applicant intends to store equipment and vehicles from his construction business at this site when the equipment is not in use on job sites. This application is being reviewed as a commercial use similar to a conditional use permitted in the M-1 zone (C.S. 25.44.030 (23)). The similar conditional use is outdoor storage of materials which are not an accessory use (C.S. 25.44.030 (13)). The criteria for this use are: 1. limited to the front, sides and rear of any building located south of Mills Creek, except that there shall be no such storage or treatment of materials in the front of those buildings having frontage on Rollins Road between Mills Creek and Broadway; 2. limited to sides and rear of any building located north of Mills Creek, and those buildings having frontage on Rollins Road between Mills Creek and Easton Creek; Special Permit for Oz�tdoor Storage of Constraclron Eq7�ipr�rerit a�id Velricles 970 David Road 3. the storage area shall be paved, not located in required parking, aisles, driveway or landscaping and fully enclosed by either an opaque or solid fence or wa11 eight (8) feet in height or by a wall of the building itself; and 4. if the storage area is located at the sides or rear of any building south of Mills Creek and not visible from the street, the eight foot fence or wall may be of open design. This proposal does not meet these design criteria of the outdoor storage use because the use is not associated with any building, the site is not fully pavecl and it has an opaque fence (chain link with wood slats) on only one side. The area where the equipment is to be stored is paved, but the remaining access area is covered with gravel. The storage site will be accessed by no more than two employees during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. The applicant anticipates that no more than 2 people will be on site at any one time, and any employee vehicles will be parked on site inside the gate. Employees will only be on the site to pick up or drop off equipment and vehicles. The applicant states that primarily, the construction equipment is stored on a construction site for 2-3 months at a time, and would only be stored on this site between jobs. The applicant has a total of 7 pieces of equipment (including construction vehicles), and expects that generally there will be no more than 3 or 4 pieces of equipment on site at any one time, but occasionally he may store all of the equipment on site if he is between jobs. There will be no customers/visitors coming to the site. Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: *Outdoor uncovered truck and equipment storage Vacant (former outdoor equipment storage) Special Permit for outdoor storage which does not meet performance criteria * Special permit for outdoor storage which does not meet performance criteria. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The City Engineer states (July 13, 1998 memo) that the applicant shall show if the site is asphalt paved or any paving is proposed for the parking area. The applicant states that the portion of the site where the equipment is to be stored is already paved, and no additional paving is proposed. The Chief Building Inspector and the Fire Marshal had no comments on this project. Study Meeting: At the August 24, 1998 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commissioners asked the applicant to define the 7 pieces of equipment to be stored on the site, do they include an ofiice trailer, and asked for photos of the equipment to be stored. The applicant has responded in the attached letter date stamped September 2, 1998, and has provided photos of the 7 pieces of equipment to be stored on the site. There will be no office trailer kept at the site and no work of any nature will be performed on the site. 2 SpecialPermit for Otrtdoor Stornge of Co�rstr-t�ctio�� Eqrripi�+e�tt a�td T�ehicles 970 David Road The Planning Commission requested that the applicant provide a proper site plan to scale which shows property line dimensions, sidewalks, gates and fences. The applicant has provided a revised site plan to scale date stamped September 2, 1998. The commission noted that there is equipment parked on the site and asked why. The applicant states that he has entered in to a lease agreement with the property owners pending City approval, and have temporarily parked a few pieces of equipment there. The Commission also asked that staff provide a map showing the location of Mills and Easton Creeks relative to the site; the attached map provides this information. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: 1. that the project shall operate on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 2, 1998, Site Plan; 2. that the construction equipment and vehicle storage facility may not be open for equipment removal or parking except during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 3. that a maximum of two employees shall be on site only to drop off or pick up equipment, and no work shall be performed at the site and no structures on or off foundations shall be permitted on the site, and there s11a11 be no utilities extended to the site; 4. that all employees shall park on site, there shall be no visitors to the site; 3 Special Perniit fo�• O�Ndoor Stornge of Cons7��uction Equipnrent nnd i�ehicles 970 David Road 5. that all equipment shall be washed and/or maintained off the site and in no case shall equipment be washed or maintained within the public or railroad right-of-ways or any adjacent privately owned parcel; and 6. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. Maureen Brooks Planner c: Joseph Howard, Howard Engineering, applicant 0 Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes APP CATION FOR PARKIN'( USE T ADD A SECOND STC CALIF NIA DRIVE, ZON� MANSA ONSTRUCTION CO VARIANCE AND S 'Y RESIDENTIAL L: � G2. (ALAN V� August 24, 1998 PERMIT FOR RES ENTIAL )VE A RETAIL USE T 1155 COON, APPLICAN AND CP Monroe viewed the staff report a d project and the commis 'oners asked: have diffic�ty with the clock ower, not appropriate at his location; CA Anders n noted that since this is� special permit t commission has authorit to work with the design the structure; would like to know what the band of squares at the to of the building is; with e added residential unit the roof pops up at e center and looks confu d, how can this be addre ed; which two parking spaces would be cov ed; why would the owne of the building not hire a uilding maintenance firm to manage and intain the building, secur' services are available the community; it is not clear are there wi dows at the perimeter of e building; explain the s e plan, where are the series of columns at e front of the building; hat are the landscape req irements in this mmercial zone, what is rovided is minimal an hidden, it could be imp oved; can the c ission see the original levation without the seco�l story dwelling unit; co d parking be im oved instead of covered ith a tin roof and lookin inappropriate with the n�w building; what 's the rear setback requir ent for the first story a for the second story; th�¢ 2800 SF reside ial structure is almost a t ird of the size of the reta' area, why is it so big, v�rhy does the on-s' e manager need so muc space; it appears that e rything submitted was a� after thought, t e addition to the building the covered parking, wh were these all not a part �f the original ap ication. There were no rther questions and the i m was set for public heazing on Septembe 14, 1998, assuming that e information could be s bmitted in a timely manne�. APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AT 970 DAVID ROAD, ZONED M-l. (HOWARD ENGINEERING, APPLICANT AND JOHNSON LEE AND HUANGE LI-CHEN PROPERTY OWNERS) CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and project and the commissioners asked: applicant should define the 7 pieces of equipment which would be stored on the site, do they include an office trailer; would like a photo of each piece of equipment to be stored; need a proper site plan showing the sidewalk, property line dimensions, gates and fences to scale, if going to approve on the basis of the site plan we need to be able to read it and know it is accurate; could staff include a map showing the location of Mills and Easton Creeks relative to this site; when made site visit there was equipment parked on this site, why. There were no further questions on this item and it was set for public hearing on September 14, 1998, assuming that revised plans and other information was available in time. -3- HOWARD ENGINEERING 724 Carolan Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010-2? 11 Telephone: (650) 375-8314 Facsimile: (650) 375-8327 TO: DATE: '� BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 970 DAVID ROAD, BURLINGAME Enclosed are photographs of the vehicles and equipment Howard Engineering proposes to park at the referenced site. There is no office trailer. Use of the site is exclusivelv for pazking/storage of vehicles and equipment: no utilities will be brought on the site; and no work of any nature will be performed on the site. Also enclosed is a scaled drawing prepared by Dave Howell of Peninsula Building Design. Howard Engineering has entered into a Lease Agreement (pending City Permit) with Li-Chen Huang Lee and Johnson Lee, the owner of the captioned site, and have temporarily parked a few pieces of equipment pending approval. We look forward to your favorable response. Sincerely, .� Jose h Howard /��rr�.�� ' t; � y��^y, s'.:",;: i ,� ;,,.. r �� r � �� % b-�.� � . , ; �5 �f' � 2 19��3 t;�TY,��- r,J,�,; r. _. F�f f;.it '�e��,.�-,...:.;:_;r;�,;;c: 1t „a Z'=-y" �. 0 I � _ � �_ . ��k '�,� • + '� �� ,:�,�s 4 -r�� ., �'`�',� _'��;'.K��l�.:-':. o �� . ¢� � ,. ti �' �+'�'�! o, ;�, ' ! ��:. i ' ' , �f �� "�'� ��. .�s� �� 7� .��, q� � ��, �a'�i'M. F '�, � J �, i�- �. �'� .� � ' A, t � ' �/,�• �� 1��'i 1 _ � �t; � � � � � r�, � �' •'` � 4�'�`� � 'i� �;� ` �� `�►�i�`��. ; �� ' . : � ._ - �•�. :�.�, ��., .�- � � ,-�,T.� ,r , : � � � '� - � ��7� �'; _ _.. ��'��' � � � . � ��. r � ��'�- � �� . � � � �� . . . � � � j � -_ � = t � ^�. ;{ 'i` ?4�r � � � �� ' � �� •ii � �� ) � � � ___� ; ; �. 0 � 8e:. - ��' � � j . � � s � � I �f i� - . �- � � . . . � ; ' , .,,, f � � �� s !,'i �� : �i�i II I�l�� i � ` . �� _� � ��'` " �. � ;� 0� 1 .. _..� � ��...��- ,�.:r. �_ �� _ �� , . �...; . `� : .X. •I � ----- � �� I � _ rr�► , . "' � .' , . ��` � 1 � I .; ,��:f �., � . � � �;�i'� �� E� i. .i':�i .• -__ _� �� ,�;� � 1�, � "� � O'P� i. G � 9�-syo Q- �.� � y��y 1� �nF -- � i '�,(��i �lt � 79r jo �O - -- -� _ '�6 - .l��p s7s �- �� ` '�O �,��-- j � 1 , �P 4� Y � ,�� 0�� F ,� , J� y, . : � .�A � � � .� � r� \' . � � � \ � � �� , . � �1�� , '\ \ \ � . , 9 ��0 `� � �,y , \ � � O�� 0 y� 6 1� �60G p � 1�i �S .� �q �o q�- � -� ,�_� � o�,Ip� f�� y��p � g� '�RpP� 1�' `�, � F o_ � , � ,'� ,pc�� fSoo �i '�'� � �`� ,�,� � � j, ' !Y ��;. � � 9/- ,' ' p0 � \� IQ, ,,, �i q'70 pA�vtp Tz� ry ; ;;'� ti '�' � � -"'� \ , �, , � qd ,;.� \ \ js° �,G' �" � ro' \ � � , o -,� . 8� h�F� ��?, '�'(/1 �, `�� '� E ,, � , -� ' �- 8 _ _� A '� ; �'�v Si - � � ��I,�\ ` ;''�� G � ' � �' �Qh Ic ro- � 9 s� ,, %�'� � °� . s , , 9, ti�. rr,s PS qJ� ,,;;� �; ;� � �, ��,o ,, ,� � 1 0 �o; , - s- ; �, 9 �9'��C` \ � 9� �j y • , ' 4 �� 4/,�'y��/ 6, T \ � �� .� ,yj 11 S, __ I 0� � 9,$, ,�� s, ,�, p, ,9 � ;,, � S� ' � � 2� O'�'F`y 13, �OP�Io. y � ��, O , � < - o �' � 1' g, �F' 'y'y � S '�. �'� 1�� I� �� 1 p- ' � � j�2� I� �qC II,S -_`- =� ��. j � �i ` r = _-_ � �q � 3�� 9 q ,� � �P �' 1�� f�'- � I \ � I�'' ` S \ W � 'ro.rso �o° '�sr c, � 1�' ,� P yIT _- � �' p '� '�o I � - ` -� c'' F`T 1 p C'' F _ '�_ __ � � 'IfJ1 j 't'(� 'IstOO �y�J�v < / �� ' _->��C�-`- �• �9y��N �j�___.� p �� P �F-� 9, �_ . 1Ca, _ '-- 'P�. o Ic�- �'� I� - 1� ,y � Ip, P P % f �� '� ' � ��'- l 7 Ic�- � 10- �,v -� � y_ '9 � 1 � � � 4. .•'r - -P ' �� c� Q�' ,\I = .� ' � , �'� _ I I jO , �� . \��, '�. \ . 9' , � ,l y ' v,. 1 , �'�� j.l, _ ,c� �� .. 9,. ,r,. � CIT � ' �'BURIJN¢AMi CITY OF BiJRLINGAME ��e _. � APPLICATION TO TI� PLANNING COMIVIISSION Type of Application:�C Special Permit Variance Other . � . • - • � � / .. � ; ♦ .s _�. � . : � ii . Assessor's Parcel Number(s): APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER �o��(/ 5 o/V L[� � Name:�,o..�rft.2� �r i.uc=�.G.v� � Name: r- �_C/-1�N �f UAti E7 L�� Address: �!� �'r�.eoC��✓ �u�.�uc- Address: q�7 0 pAV I� Ro�Sp City/State/Zip: �u.e.Li�.��A�� 0 9�fD/o City/State/Zip: BLt RLI �1C7�/Y�� C�) `j�/ n Phone (w):,��So � ��°� �3i�_ Phone (w): �i � � -- 6� '7 5�q 7 (h):_ �� s�� 3�3-- 3�-� l fax: �6��) 3�- 83� � ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: ��/� Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (w): ih): fax: (n):_ d�o .-��3q �� fax: 6�D — 6� 7 7 7 gG' Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. PROJECT DESCRII''rION• �Qj i�•eyGi� i�i� �O�Si�it �7 0� `�C��C LC-..s' ��iNv C�; cu,r� ��.�� ' AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: herein is true and I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. �. � �N� �,.�- �� _ � -� - 9� -� Property Owner's Signature Date --------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ------------------ Date Filed: - �- - Fee: t Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: J��-. -� 9 1998 .,;T`�' �� ?�J..�.li, _.. ,,..._ �(_.q;,1i�!;i'�:�:: �>;_:- . � CiTY �,t• O� 3URIJNGAME `�'� i._ �:IT1' ��)F :U�LI��!(;Hl�:ilE :�F''E(;IfaL f'Er�l�,/IIT H�'f'�I��aTl�i)f��1`,� The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.52.0201. Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the p�oposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or. infurious to property oi improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. �%O,eAGi� c9� 1/C—��cL�-5 �iv�� u.�-/�r�rc�✓T. 2. 3. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Bui/ingame Genera/ P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT (, �Mr1'l�tCiAC ��%fI , �llE.9 L43'�/� �'�2 �rnil�l.e uSE How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and cha�acter of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining pioperties in the genera/ vicinityl CD�,.tim�cc�,�G �,CEA -- �� r.lse' �'J,� �.y,rl.�2 G�3�-� �� ,,.:. �, ,.....� �.� r .. �_ . , �re2 sp.frtn �f U� - 9 1998 .;!iY �i'c �'1.)'i-�"r...�fVi:';'`'.id;�_ �LFafV{Vlh�'':- �-;�.;�-i. 1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, oi convenience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighborinp properties or structures on those properties? If neighborinp properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, li�hting, pavin�, landscapinq sunlight/shade, views from neighborinfl properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or qeneral welfare7 Public health includes such things as sanitation (parbapel, air quality, discharpes into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storape of chemicals, situations which encourape the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases). Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protectiont �II alarm systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the st�ucture create a �uisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly �atherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal). �enera/ welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community �ood. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit7 �onvenience. How would the proposed st�ucture or use affect public convenience (such as access to o� parkinp for this site or adjacent sites)7 Is the proposal accessible to particular seqments of the public such as the elderly or handicapped? 2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Bur/ingame General P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT Ask the Plannin� Department for the qeneral plan designation and zoninp dist�ict for the proposed project site. Also ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" accordingly. 3. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the existing neighborhood and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityl How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood7 If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If chan�es to the structure are proposed, was the addition desipned to match existin� architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood7 If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a lonfl term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neiphborinp structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no chanpe to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. How will the structure or use within the structure chanpe the character of the neiphborhood? Think of character as the imafle o� tone established by size, density of development and �eneral pattern of land use. wll there be more traffic or less parkinp available resultinp from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighbo�hood will change, state why. How will the proposed project be compatible with existinfl and potential uses in the �eneral vicinity? Compare your project �rvith existinp uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or statE why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. , a�ez w•tm+ �� . � � OURLINQAM[ COMI��RCIAL APPLICATIONS �°• ' PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM a., 1. Proposed use of the site. ��i�.�.��,G ��.�.+�s�.ur�> o� [/C��c�cs �✓i� �au.iP,�1�> . . 2. Days and hours of operation.�,��P.�n;� ,i%iGofv�L�.�El7o� io �� .5�r�� 3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type). ./�C� �/��sic��s �o 4. Cunent and projected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays Full-time Part-time � � � --- � Weekends Full-time Part-time 5. Cunent and projected ma�cimum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays Q J° c'� � � Weekends � c� � � d � 6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner, employees and visitors/customers): � 7. Where do/will the owner & employees park? ��vs��c- C�/� 8. Where do/will customers/visitors parl�l /1��/� 9. Present or most recent use of site. --- . � � " '�,._.. � , . 10. List of other tenants on property, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach list if necessary). �E!L - 9 199� � . .�T� �T � � t i . � , � J: �I,.. ... . . ��.. !' L,�, I�' I`r I i\! .:; �: `=- ROUTING FORM DATE: July 9, 1998 TO: C�CITY ENGINEER _CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL _FIRE MARSHAL _SR LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR _CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUB.TECT: Request for special pernut for storage of construction vehicles and equipment at 970 David Road, zoned M-1, APN: 025-272-160. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: August 24, 1998 STAFF REV�W BY MEETING ON: Monday, July 13, 1998 THANKS, Maureen/Ruben �t� �� «� y��.c cc�`7 f �S G'19C��^ s ��s�'�•� � � v-e__c�� ,� � � . � � : � v -c ��'`�j cn�-��- . ✓✓ � P J � ' � �3 �� Date of Comments � � � :r i � �s '>-c� J� a �' -4-� J� ��;� � � � � � �S' ^ ! �_ ��f � � • CITY OF BURLINGAME rC�LJi�I pLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 696-7250 97QI David Road AF�N:0c5—�7�-1E0 - Application for special permit for storage of PUBLIC HEARING constr��ction vehicles and equipment at 97Q� NOTICE David Raad, zoned M-1. The City of Rurlingame Planning Commission annaunce5 the following public hearing on Nbnday, Sept e■her 14, 1998 at 7: 00 P. M. i n t h e i y a aunci am ers located at 501 f�rimrose Road, Purlingame, C�lifor^nia. Mailed Septe�ber 4, 1998 (Please referto other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME ��' � , _;• �'''��'�.: --��:,�r'� � - A copy of the apphcattan �tnd plans,for.th�s pro�ect may be reviewed prior � to the meeting at �f1n��Flanriing �epartzi'►enC ai" SO1 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califo�i�,�, � ; . ' � �'' � �� If you challenge the subje�t application(s) in �ourt, you may be limited to raising only those issues �au oi someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the not�ce� pr in„ written co�espondence deli:vered to the city at or prior to tE�e,:pi�l��c�h�tt�ng�� °f ' _ _ � 4: _� a, . _ . Property owner� who re�eiv�� ot�ce�a�s responsible for; infomung their bo t this noti `�` ��"�`�'�addi�itinal information,. p�e�se call (650) �: tenants a u : . � . � 696-7250. '�l�an.k you �� ,, - � � £# �� ;� , : Margaret Mo�a,#�� City Planner ��?�� ; � ��`�' `�; PU BL�.��, (Please refer to other side) �h �, 4 yj-�* 4„ . � � ' �� , � �G NOTICE �;� � �� ....°�-��" �, .-. . � � , �'�y� f "'�� 1 l • � ! �rj+r. .r. •� V� �' � ',�1 ,{��r - . ♦ � � . '' � . ' S ,�. �. � �'��5 � ;; . � � � .� � u ��, ��: ,�, � . , � � � :,� �M� . . � , ,—�. � .� ��,-�_- -:�r� .� � , ,. � � ��—�"�-- _,..�.� � �� t � � � �ar,. - . , ., � j � �'�'� � � � . �'� s -r'` �� ' �.� � .a � , � � ., . �. . . M ..� � �� .• .a �;� , - : � . ._ .. ,..�. � .�. . � . . .� , -. ..-... � :. ...,:. ��- 1550 . � � ,; � £ � �� F�� ry y� .�'�i� ' ' ._ «s�.. .� { .�J� �� ' . >, , ,_ � � ,. _ , �',y ' � �� I� � p�� r �t f�� ` ,� .ti � --r- � � � . 'R � �� i�i'II � h'� ,� � �n. �,� . . ... � s, ' , � f dr'� ... � � . i ,'� ��- � P:; �`� � � � �� , t h- �;-, t � ::� t� K e�', `� � ,� � � .. .- � . 1 ''�MII I � � . 4+ ' � y�g� 'F�. . Y j % �� ^'��`��a �y�*' �,,� II � � 1�a+cNTi • .. qf . f%4 . � � �t U - , x tq v��, 'i `r, � � k :4�� O 1� �? • �4 �',�§ � ` � t �` � � ' i' �' �` ; �� ,� � � � � � �E,, � ., ' 1534 . ;� . � "r- �, � • -� , � {. � � , : .� � : , � � . �. �r ;�� ;w _ >�. . , t ' , �; I , '�; � * ; � �...� ��;. .:9„ ,�.. ,: � � � e � ,�� .9: � 1 � � 3� � � , (� ; �� '�'a'bo `� qloo � � `�' q oa�� (a . �;� ;'� . �� _ a .�� o � �� . �.. . '�oqD ' � '� � � , � � �� qY�U .w.,,.._ � . q� � �. �� , yp � �� , F � � .� ��"Y .._ . I� � �� . . . ��t� � ;� � '`� � �.l _. �' � � t � `2 .. � .y. � . W 1( �.", rY,.� �'2 a �Yt � � �� ` . � I5?�- ,_,- ,��' o� �� 1515: �.. .. � �� .� "`' � � r �� . . � ' ,t 5 C ' � , .� � � ,� .ar ,�: _ ��a. y �.° � .��!!1� �*��- � �� . ��_ � �* � . � ��' '�� ' ��`� � �� -� �� , a :.� �,: Z _ �� ;e,.�w-- , , J �' ��° c'��. .1 '_ � � � � � s O �, '' a : �' � � 1 � ,, �, � , ,► �t� .�"r; � ..:,u v�c � � � Q '��'; 7 p `: :s � �1 � �, ! ,� '� 'g�:4 t �� G � , 1t� . � . '�°��' ' !'� � .y� ' , -- y � �i . '� � � � a r�h� t..! � � � � n � ,. � . j � � ,,,, , � ' �' ,�' , � :� �* � , ,, r, ,� 'a �. - . ,r-� ,, ' . _. . ' , ` � ` � � . ��. �� .,� �� , � `� � � � ' � �� .. . �''"ut� "" i��Y► +� , � ` �'s~� �F � ... �`r:�.4 9"' . o ' �. �'` �' .�;� ''."cj _ _ �k;� �.t ,t�;r - �fi` � �,�'�.-""" .�M * � � . . � � ..; ' . � n� � � '9: _. '.�. � . `� . � .. ��'., . ,++� d�''+R'"� � � ' ,5�,� .��, ,` � d«� ��.a, a �;' . k .. � �.. �'� i , ' ., � �� +� } �.. .. , �' ;. :;. ��'' � �� ,��'�. .�.e�� ( :� ' t�i�NiYrl`.-1. "�� ,ry � � ; d� 3 r� � � � '�� . � . P � �: � �- �� ,�,,y�� :iA I. k��. �- ,�'�mFi�� j�.`,' . , s.. �� ^�11� � ��, . .,.. .� . . , . ,� ~ , ' " . � , . � " �,� �� N ! .. .y '�6 . . . � . . .� � . : _ .. . ; �' RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a s� ial p rmi for storage of con tr c ion vehicl � anrl P��men+ at 970 David Road� zoned M-1, J�hnson and Li- hen H�an .�P,_��er y owners, APN: 025-272-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Se�tember 14, 1998 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, existing facilities, Class 1, operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing is hereby approved. 2. Said special permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, �ave Lurt�riaga , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Se�tember , 199g , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval Categorical Exemption and Special Permit 970 David Road effective SEPTEMBER 23, 1998 1. that the project shall operate on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 2, 1998, Site Plan; 2. that the construction equipment and vehicle storage facility may not be open for equipment removal or parking except during the hours of 8:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m. Monday through Friday; 3. that a maximum of two employees shall be on site only to drop off or pick up equipment, and no work shall be performed at the site and no structures on or off foundations shall be permitted on the site, and there shall be no utilities extended to the site; 4. that all employees shall park on site, there shall be no visitors to the site; 5. that all equipment shall be washed and/or maintained off the site and in no case shall equipment be washed or maintained within the public or railroad right-of-ways or any adjacent privately owned parcel; and 6. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. 2