The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About198 California Drive - Staff ReportItem No � Consent Calendar ��, ��4� �, �,.: �` ? ` ��''" � , , �� .-'�� ; ;�� „„ �` � � � ,��: ��. � 'w' ..� i �" , �`'� r� _ __ ..__ � � ,�.,,_. . , ,.,, _ ��.. _. _.. �.,.._._.. � � -�� _•.-,�.fi-- �,...s,,.<...�.__ _ � .�+�'.m..«�.*...""" .� � �., v � �a.b `� . ....� ' ' . : � �,��,,.. *^T , i. '. �; ��y� . �t '" .. . .. , . .. ".' . _.r.�'� .. - . �.. . �..�� "_. � ..:. . ...... .. PROJECT LOCATION 198 California Drive City of Burlingame Commercial Design Review Address: 198 California Drive Item No. Consent Calendar Meeting Date: June 13, 2011 Request: Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building (Putnam Chevrolet). Applicant: Putnam Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc. Architect: Hugh Hynes, Proto Inc. Property Owner: 100-198 California Drive Llc General Plan: Commercial Uses: Service & Special Sales APN: 029-233-080 Lot Area: 95,911 SF Zoning: C-2, Sub Area D Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review. Project Description: The subject site contains several buildings including a finro-story auto showroom and service facility at 100 California Drive (corner of California Drive and Bayswater Avenue), a four-story parking garage fronting California Drive, and a two-story auto showroom and service facility (two separate buildings) at 198 California Drive (corner of California Drive and Howard Avenue). This application is for proposed changes to the fa�ade of the existing commercial building located at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Sub Area D, Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area. The building is currently occupied by Putnam Chevrolet and Cadillac for automobile sales and service. With this application there are no changes proposed to the uses within the existing building (showroom and sales offices). Recently, an addition for Cadillac was completed at the side and rear of the building. The addition was not subject to commercial design review at that time since less than 50% of the fa�ade was changed (commercial design review required if more than 50% of the fa�ade is being changed). The recently completed addition is shown as existing space on the proposed project plans. Commercial design review is now required because the recent addition and proposed alterations cumulatively exceed 50% of the fa�ade. The project includes alterations to the building facades along California Drive and Howard Avenue. The existing building contains painted stucco plasterwalls and an aluminum-framed storefrontwindow and doorsystem. The proposed alterations include removing stucco infill sections to reveal existing glazing, adding aluminum- composite paneling at the upper portions of the building and a new aluminum-composite entry element. Portions of the existing building containing stucco will be retained and repainted. Please refer to the proposed building elevations (sheet A.301) provided by the architect. A materials board has been submitted and will be available at the public meeting. The project also includes adding a freestanding solar canopy in the area between the showroom building, service building and parking garage (see Site Plan on sheet A.101). This area is currently used for inventory parking. The solar canopy would serve as a charging station for electric vehicles. The exterior material is thin gauge aluminum cladding (see Sunlogics Solar Canopy Elevation). All other zoning code requirements have been met. The project requires the following application: ■ Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building (CS 25.57.010 cb) i2))• Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Parks Supervisor, Chief Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal, City Arborist and NPDES Coordinator. As required by the Parks Supervisor, three new 24-inch box size Chanticleer Pear trees will be planted along California Drive. Commercial Design Review 198 California Drive Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on May 23, 2011, the Commission had two questions regarding the application and voted to place the item on the Consent Calendar (May 23, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes attached). 1. Concerned about the condifion of fhe existing sfucco; wou/d like to see some affention paid fo the finish of these areas, particularly as they are viewed in relation fo the composite panels. Smooth out the finish of fhe stucco in addition to painting. • The applicant notes that options for improving the appearance of the stucco is being studied in consultation with the general contractor and plaster subcontractor. 2. Could exfend the landscaping to conceal the emergency generator. • The applicant notes that the owner will take this into consideration as part of the long-term landscaping plan for the property. Planning staff would note that the emergency generator is currently located on a raised slab foundation and within inches of property line along Howard Avenue. Therefore, it would be difficult to add landscaping along the property edge at this location. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: 1. Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's May 23, 2011, Design Review Study meeting; that no major changes are proposed to the mass and bulk of the existing commercial building, which is currently consistent with the mass and bulk of other structures in the immediate area; and that the proposed exterior materials which consist of stucco walls, aluminum-composite paneling, an aluminum-composite entry element and an aluminum-framed storefront window and door system will enhance the appearance of the building at the pedestrian level; for these reasons the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's six Commercial Design Review Guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 2 Commercial Design Review 198 California Drive that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 15, 2011, sheets A.001 through A.005, A.101, D.201, D.301, A.201 through A.301 and solar canopy plans date stamped April 15, 2011, sheets 001 through 102; any changes to the exterior materials shall require review by the Planning Commission; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 18, 2011 memo, the City Engineer's April 28, 2011 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 18, 2011 memo, the Parks Supervisor's April 25, 2011 memo and NPDES Coordinator's April 18, 2011 memo shall be met; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; and 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 3 Commercial Design Review Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Hugh Hynes, Proto Inc., architect Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Photographs of Adjacent Buildings Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 3, 2011 Aerial Photo 198 California Drive 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes May 23, 2011 10. 198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2 — APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO THE FA�ADE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (PUTNAM CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC., APPLICANT; PROTO ARCHITECTURE, LLP, ARCHITECT; 100-198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE LLC. PROPERTY OWNERI STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated May 23, 2011, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: None. Chair Yie opened the public comment period. Hugh Hines, 118A Tiffany Avenue, San Francisco; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Asked if the support for the solar canopy encroaches upon the drive aisle. (Hines — the drive aisle will be shifted.) ■ Concerned about the condition of the existing stucco; would like to see some attention paid to the finish of these areas, particularly as they are viewed in relation to the composite panels. Smooth out the finish of the stucco in addition to painting. ■ Could extend the landscaping to conceal the emergency generator. ■ Likes the idea of the charging station; could also install additional solar panels on other flat roofs. ■ Commended Mr. Putnam for upgrading all of the buildings. Public comments: None There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Lindstrom made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Yie called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0-0-0. This item concluded at 9:56 p.m. 14 � �� r G� .� �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: fl2� -2 33' �8a � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: e z 9� Z33 - o�� ~ ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT A c APPLICANT project contact person� OK to send electronic copies of documents (� Name:��,j�.m ��iIQQLf.i l '�� Address: t r City/State/Zip: p Phone: S� - 3M Fax: (� S� ,� 70� o? % �{g PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: _,�o� S�2.In K,, Tl!l79�-fN Address: � � - � �rz.�1�CGt, ., � City/State/Zip: l.titi-Q.[�'1.UGt��P �'�-Q yOIQ Phone: (� �v s S�' S� l,3 Fax: (D 5� S S$' S Ia oZ 7 E-mail: _�]��5� � %��7�n.c�in E-maiL � �_ _ D��,T�Gz1LTD.L�/Y! ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact person,BT OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: �l.0 a�1 �►��( �'LC/1 1'�L7?b /A/� Address City/State� Phone: � l 5 5l � c� �� Z Fax: _ �p Jv o� �-� Iq % E-mail � ��, �� d�'�' � n�R 15 zc�7 CITY OF BURLIP�GAME CDD-P�AiVNINU t�IV. * Burlingame Business License #: 2 `� �°�, � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �OVRTI�oni _��1��2 ff{GA-D� U..4DDlr/L-� ��rT�rr�vt� 'Pb��-� 1n'r��2 ��v�t�t� ��;x-rv�s, No �t-�4-�� a� �s� 02- �Lco Di� c.A--n�,,/ 7a Sv; vD� �4�-A- AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: � � Date:��T/1 I am aware of the proposed a ication and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. .� Property owner's signature: '� � Date: I� Date submitted: `� I l S I � I * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. 5: � HANDOUTS �PC Application. doc ,r, . � e S �' �-. �t�. ,^.F,,,J � vs 1 I �G � d �� : � C�1't�fn�4, �V. �D(��r� S � �-� � 3 ��,I;-�� j vr �,�n a,r.c.. C� ('�, '� 1 n � r e ��, c a�u� r (�w►.�erc��l �S� ti �P�v ,�.P,�, �D r- L V1 R n S `{-p �i'�l .� �a� a� a-t- , � � 1 I_ . r� a. � -eJ� �� 5 '�"1 "� GD ►^'� ►'''� �f G r �� DUU 1 l �! < Yl � . ' .� Date: To: From: April 18, 2011 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the faCade of an existing commercial building at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, APN: 029-233-080 Staff Review: April 18, 2011 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 3) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 4) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated in these plans prior to performing this work. w 5) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 6) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 7) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 9) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 10)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 11) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 12)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 13)On your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction c. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Proposed fire separation distances h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered 14)Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for existing buildings including: a. Accessible paths of travel b. A level landing must be provided on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. c. Accessible countertops d. Accessible bathrooms e. Accessible parking 15)Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 16)Doors and/or windows cannot project into the public right of way 2010 CBC §3202.2. Amend the plans to show that doors and windows in their fully open position do not encroach into the public right of way. 17)Specify the total number of parking spaces on site The accessible parking shown in the basement must comp�y with the accessibility requirements � Date: � o Project Comments Date: April 18, 2011 To: d City Engineer (650) 558- 7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558- 7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, APN: 029-233-080 Staff Review: April 18, 2011 1. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. Reviewed by: V V Date: 4/28/2011 Project Comments Date: �� From: April 18, 2011 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 X Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, APN: 029-233-080 Staff Review: April 18, 2011 Regarding comments of installation of fire sprinkler system: the underground fire service plans shall be submitted separately to the Burlingame Building Department for review. �,s;., _ � . "'� � � "��'�� AP�R � � �011 t;irr ^� a� r;-L��:��nn� �c��-�ua� ��vir�� ,�, � � Reviewed by: � I �I,,� � �1�' �-- v Date: �� c�'U � � 0 Date: Project Comments April 18, 2011 To: � City Engineer � (650) 558-7230 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, APN: 029-233-080 Staff Review: April 18, 2011 �% 1. Include 3 new 24" box street trees on California Dr. � Include Tree Grates from attached detail � Provide irrigation to trees from attached planting detail. Reviewed by: B Disco � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Date: 4/25/11 � � � � � � � � � � H �1 � � � I-y-� � � ,• � . 1'-fi' MIN. PYC VtTERAI. LiNE • ' � � 4-PLY '!"X 2'-0° RUBBER � /�� , . z 71E5 IRfSTALLED 1N/A '. P n rnnsr & N�ut� � _ '�6 ryi. a• s � ZfTYP ) N ' t� THE SI'Al�S ' � A o �z � � �S � �O � �� O N ° � �j x ' ° •'� � O `` o•�... '�r�N � a � o:�';� {-�• z a : .�A � o ,�': � � Z • 0 � '1"x 4" R1MD T� RUH8ER T[ES PL4CED 6" MAX BELOW �AAIN FORK OR BRANQi INSTALL� WITH A TW15T AND NA9L� TO 51'Ai� '(Z)2" DIA LOUCE POLE PINE STAI�S -aS C�AL. �R SMW.LER (TJ 3" DIA LODCE POLE PINE STAI�S ' -24' BOX OR LARCER . -1"x 4" R011GH REpWOOD WIThI (2j 2° CALV. NAILS FACH CONNEGTI�N fLk7CATE ON PREVAItIIVG wir�n s�o4 PiACE ROdT qtOWN �� -2� ABOVE FINISHED GRAD 2' OF FlNE SCREENED FlR eAwc r FMISHED CRADE SCARIFY SfDES ROOY eALL � =�--� COMPACT NATIVE SOIL FOR BASE 1'-b" . . MIN. 2 X COMAWER 4° DIA. X 3'-0° LOt�tG' • PERFORATID . STVRENE PIPE WliH eu►c�c STYRENE DRAtN � C�RATE COVER AND No�s: euse� ir�cAnav USE 2 PIPES IN COPi[�TE Clli-0UI' AREAS. PUf P1PE ON UPHILL SIDE OF TREE. LEVEL SITE NORTH CiF TREE. ' PVC SCH 40 - '� �PINE STAKE 1 y4 " GALV. ROOFING idAlt d.EACH ENDj COMPACTEQ TOPSQIL r :i . y. � . � ��ti�� \\ .,�`'' �� BUBBLER HEAD CRATE COVER /� \� � ��■_ 541.80 PVC NIPPIE • // PIPE SRE — MA7CF{ BASE OF HEAD PROVIDE A 4" MiN., 6' MNX. SLOT TO ALLOW POR $FfTI.EMFt�ti' WRAP PERFORATEO PIPE NflTH FILTER FABRIC. 4' DU1. x 3'-0' PERFORATED SiYRBVE DRlUN PIPE FlLL BOTTOM 6" OF DRA(N , PIPE W(TH 1121N. DRAIN ROCK �AIN. 0 0 q a .o 0 - o a o 0 0 0 o � o BUBBL�R DEfAIi. �� a� TREE GRATE POURED SLAB STEEL FRAME—COORD -' a ' • ' '- '--d . �._ :°.;`..�.'_ a ; . . W/ GRATE THICKNESS =�_ ' -.' _ � °- • ' • - ' , -� •• '" ' d 6 ' . -e � 'a' . - d - . � � • e'" q- • #3 REBAR . - • ' : - ° :. • �01�! b�lz c�o�4T�ti 4--• •- - - - a . �+ '- - • " " . - • -a - -• :° � • : a' . $ . 0 . �.e . ' �b • . _ . _ O - a_-, - .. , d : � - •°'A.'a. . � -: • p - � : . • . �.d• -- e• .a.. �.• •-• .+ •� . :� . . ' �� . .w . s. . - i�A�. �vo� � cla rk 9�'��.v, �a jor. U R BA N AC C E S S O R I E S 465 Eost 15th Street Taeoma. WA 9B421 Ph (253) 572-1112 Fax (253) 572-1119 �}� rjQ, �� rj� �� PROJECT: PRO,fECT# DATE: 3/ 16/ 98 SCALE: N'r5 � MATERIAL: 5T�1. DRAWN BY: At%NAN SI'I�IKN i 2- of 3 ��ei�ie,�-rir�Ns TREE GRATES, TRENCH GRATES, DRAIN COVERS, MANHOLE COVERS, & BUILDING BUTTONS Materlale: Cast Iran per ASTM A4B dass 35b or betteJ. Standard Fmish is raw cest grey Iron. Meterials Optiw�s: Cast Alumimim per ASTM B26, Cest Ductlle kan (for vehicular traffic). or Cast Bronxe per ASTM BZ71. Finish Optfons: � kon & Ductfle Irar� Powdercoe4 Pe�nt (watcaat), �� W �jY' & Prhne Coa� Aluminum & Bromr Powdercoa4 PaHna, &ush, G�a,� & High Polish. D A 1 /w�/'� rY1 V 1�/ ar � LigAtholes, EkcVical Access Hates, Fountafn Jet Holcs: �� I Atl pattems available with holes to accomodete tixMes, r' � per custom� specfllcatla�s. Also aveila6le: casl metal and lexen covers. �Ar�� v s�:: (,o � fl r� Olmensions stated are nominal. Due to verfeUans In metel, shflnkage amounts may very sllghtly from caspng W castlng; and may e(fect over-all lenglh of trench runs. Casdngs [ypicelly meesure 1l8' under [he sixe called ouL Frames are rypfcally 518' wersized. Frn exaU dirnensions, call Urhan Aaesso►fes direcUy. �r��rr'�d rPERIMETER FRAME /� �o , � �O�'' �#3 REBAR `� }' ,� � p'� � l/ a cRATE �O•' � CGRATE � � PERIMEfERFR. \ i' PERIMETER FRAME � ��p� REfE ° ' � SWBRE7E PERIMETER � S�Ap ��--- GttATE � � FRAME � " a NE1N 1(4' N 2' K Y -TYP.1/4" 2' x 2' j^'� '�' CQNCRE7E qg �rV( g/16'H HOLE TAB W/9�16"6 HOLE � SLAB �R 1/2' CONCRETE FOR 7/Z'0 CONCRETE A �IGHOR ApS �PER MFR. INNSTRUCTIONS R MFR. R#� �BY INSTALLEl� (8Y INSTALLER) "S" STANDARD "R" RETRO FIT INVERTED "R" USEU WITH NEW �y�� D SI.An&S� �SURRO�ND SLA83G St1RR0UN� SLABS �PERIMETE#3REBAR 4gg0�'' ��'iP�$� . � �� 1 � �Oy' �� ` PQ 0�' a� � GRA7E ,� F,v � ��'� � / � PERIMFTER fR � 3115 THICK F.B. ��MEfER FRAME ��•% �PAVER CONT. STANDAFF ,, ..�r+.:.' � MORTAR - r'..'',� � MORTAR GRA7 ]r PERIMETER fRAME ,° �' �B SLAB m�• � 5"B�S�H �- MORTAR � � F BNT `TYP,1/4' x 2' x 2' �-N `iYP.114' x 2' x 2' TAB W/ 9/16'0 HOLE L TAB W/9/1fi'0 FIOLE FOR 1/2 CONCRETE C��E ANCHOR AS PER MFR. � SUB•SLAB FOR 1!2' CONCRETE INSTRUCTIONS(BY o� INSiR�UCTAONSR�� INSTALLER) �� lBY INSTALLEf� "P/A" "P" PAVER 'A" ADJUSTABLE PAVER/ADJUSTABLE USED WRH PAVERS, USED WITH PAVERS USED WITN P1�VERS, SAND SETfING BED GROUT SEffiNG BEd COMINUOUS sK1RT FItAME DETAiLS , TREE ��A� �F � SURROUN�ING CONCRE� � II SURFACE CONCI�ETE FORM BOA DS � TYP. CONC. � FORM STAKE 7REE GRATE FRAME INSTALLATION S7ANDARD'S' fRAME USED AS CONCRETE FORM. STAKES OR SPREADERS REQUIRED TO KEEP FRAME FROM DEFORMING DURING CONCREfE PIACEMENT 0.25•20 UNC S5. GRATE � BUiTON-HEAD SCREW � \ � pER1AAETER FRAME � x-cuT GRATE BOLT-DOWN DE7AIL nry� UR6.?.N ACCESSORIE5" r1 urbanoccessorlee.com CUSTOM LIGHT PORT ORDERING INFO r DEPTH '`�N�� Q�p� r DEPTH I A I � -, � � B D TVPF-L IYPE � � 7YPc a A'� E�f Tvoc e -INDICATE LOCAiIONlTYPE Of LIGHT PORT(S) TO CENTE�{R� pOpF E�(tg�01�T51DE EDGE(S) THERE WILL BE TW PATTERN CHAR�GESNS. 3' & 4' TREE GRATES = TWO SECTIONS 5' TREE GRATES = 4 SEC'fI0N5 6' TREE GRA7ES, VARIES PER PATfERN -ii��v� � of 3 Project Comments Date: 1� From: April 18, 2011 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 X NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, APN: 029-233-080 Staff Review: April 18, 2011 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Please include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMPs), as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochure for guidance. The brochure may also be down loaded directly from "flowstobay.org." It is recommended that the construction BMP's be placed on a separate full size plan sheet (2' x 3` or larger as appropriate) for readability. For additional assistance, please contact Kiley Kinnon, Stormwater Coordinator, at (650) 342-2727. 1—'1�V�� V �� APR 1 � 20' i 1 � - �� Reviewed by: Gr' ^ �i.,��'��„�.�„-,,- J CITY OF BURLWGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. Date: % y_/ � � ' r' J, a� � . � smmw.w � PoR�4ovPmmGwRaytvm �� a� `�, � __.� �`�;:` .ti : J,- General ~ � T"�' � Constrnction & Site Supervision � �� r �� .�>,.s��.�� .�,�..w��.m�.�� ,.m�.a�a�...,.�„�. ��m�� :.w�.�,� y..:. � a.� �> w�m �w ewa e m.o, ..tr e,. - .�eama.i�.�aocmm.aQ�u.raceeq �mmWb[=myvvY �Luk d�a Luw rlae � ��bl� mJ �o�mh�am.t MW �x hvmm �'O�EIe m aayms �Yo .ada m de mmCim aua 65m�o0cmtrs�or� �Nol b � +umm�ehmu�uLWtlrrvpm TWtl¢ �� bmWvdmfu�m peklq. ��dc RAeXS � �autivic eqoyscn m�em i d�cp�ed m�6m W be �n9.R� fim m�� mmm p.'m u4q me e�d'Au� �Y-M�boi�^PmeQilc �/[ay..t.m6 �e(m�ni�-parwl�voS `•_ "'- Ca.ea�me ple M adlv�ctlm�b�iOV��Iv ^�Y �4 J7[N PdbveY eQapmE vdrn �lusm� � ��l�leeauetmetl¢ �C �Al �D ➢^a vRm WLL J�Y e �e� dn� �>�.vY��t6v�q6mme�. uc � V�� r o8c usilQ�e e mV �odm mE a0c{oWpy� Iam q le4 � nd �u a�nY �+Mm �Ydomlmumlaleoilm �mdv�cm6w rt+l� m e�wd sda¢ Us �f d�� mv� +4mc+r�Pe�01c I(�mmmv�va.urlev m�elapmrdsdo.a �G.c aG m.he�w i�o.c m.�t Beqomu> I r sWvk.m.ey.m.a��namm.�a.a � �ptv A pWec 4mL m�mm! b pe.m blapd6quidi Ns+v d� wt ��rr Sl r.bc n m.na m. �.u.. J146 � Y�� b0�! m mhYbd'm patl ^°�t wda bYme luamt �isY stl �.w e. myo,.e�r�y. o.a mu.a �� a�. kala w1�4/N�s JRv.W. � �eyelm - v�ls �ut ��u elmiS baYetlY� O�lx mly me mW ri� aW ru��.ur..a.�.e�.,ov�.arn,o,c p3yqd�a�SLOIe mvlW sy r emeart +4�4 nT �l W�m4 �S clm�d� w�l 0�4 �. d�NIeY m�� im W vlrmed W. utlhv. puWeti ae em. im� ar m..d ea amenamm e�mr v�ry. �y � W�d��ambe�¢ liy ��*j �el �cE�sd pdou, R11Ct BdJr� 4otr+y�tvd imacrrca6 ulslmvC vcgs tlm Mml�4 ms deb'v Qu omot 4 v.Y�� mi OCWmbo.ppqWb �m�paWdu hm�hawn¢Meabmf virAWvlu.� Am 6 d. mm� Q�� esat a m..m b.d � !1 . " �• Ai! � - -i A�1 � •� .!f Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the j ob right! Runoff from streets and othet paved azeas is a major sonrce ofpollution in local creeks, San Fiancisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Cons�uction activities can d'uectly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other conshuction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines wi31 ensure your comp]iance with local stormwater ordinance requirements. Remember, ongoing manitoring and maintenance of installed conhols is ccuciai to propa mmplementation_ Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwork & Paving F iesh Concrete PainYing 8c Application Equipment Activities & Mortar Ap�lication o£ Solve�ts & Adhesives Operarion — a � .�m�.,�:��w..�, �� .e.e..r� ! ssLdW��mmdy,eley�b�we0¢ p�r ym JQoi.Ow�fwbYaW�qiM�[5�� lYmovec�i+a�m7'•�`�=Y�o P1O��" , JPeG wja��spm,Wwuh�ofvpep m1mY5mme�d�c � p��pv+ry�mbaoqm�oelm ��Y�'vdw� �yepwrLs�a�trurim'av[�eLivdyylmW. dmn � �mM1mMavavq �m m�w0.�94a'o�euaaa�emOcin m1e4 ��rm� mdmeh b.wmd9�dP�L��eGm�c JP�e�Ee��Gped��c�4�4aemm Jlbee�weAeAa�bWdeevelmq�mrmm wllticmdMM�suimmc� h�vi6hry>W�Y��.dl J=x�cLmld.memA�4l�oFoqi+�tet JYovldaaGwhiLsd6m�>9�F�-�^9�=fio �4km[Vmrmmuh4aBpv vhme�vPmLn PmdYfitW�qvle4 /Us�LCYlim>LsbsbGi�al�woC�mmdouvr �16mmp1ymMiueLlhvbertmmY�P� Jitrf n4^��aW�P�caetl..L'ckud es.mdp�dedz.0 p� f � ww��a�� JC YxkpleaGmu�bim�vY6�WmWa �A+m1M`�Cs6wlw�uvt¢w�uM1er.mxhm�m ufms4tMos Guh W��rill W�cime JV1dmCmiead�eplx.mtrml.n&mrmhm. ��V• . Im�vWcloYLhv�ndmmh[luvhmqqt�hy voOc��m�.mhqVmmAwebibm Ip�hm�md�ma¢emmml�Am� 'd�t�vlwJ.fof�ldc eeh�ad�p9�Cc0ev.GT��m+�4meh �y� JIAerL kdot�.:t�mB�mt�moGnvm! apmr aom�om, md rsJcl� vpmcwpom3lS w �nuaet fopueofLLehul�bu.rc /pmp�Y�SibudamlmmdW�m�m�4 Jtkruvuh�s�mav'vl6emapmebypepttrm. mmebelabmNa�eNF etivv�tres�mmu�o�mmemtm�6Ctl- I➢ev�mdxldo6bn�mvclmepip�m Ima.dm.�k,adupusbdnaa prs . JCo.cdr�IhmdaWvmmztlmmmW�wim lasXkuwd�a6TlcEmin. JSdA�L�..med � �o�+tic�b�bmAbraa tmoHwib vaeqvvkbr�f�ha. ! GKT A� fim P�R vA m➢ Pm� S W �vlu[ mtl�l �v4��i.m�l�vm �r•��aa�+.e.m�..rswmiobam j��°e7N�amecm�m..amaevw. INmabedo�u" 9�dle�aq'M"m�be0i(tih cnt'w..�Q�k �wsm�WQ.em..a�dw��. autm.......�..;.^-�as�wcd�mmmti .v�.e�me.a..vm�uxmramw� �a�W.u�..et.,mm.�rq.s�eaw �`tlma � aJ�1��4m1�+.mNmuO)vLm.rc Smy��. � Jmpecl�d'¢Fkma�avym�dYE'W�dmes p Ttilf)motui�l�4mcPmm^mbtn9 �h�w�a�nedswvd mcdortdowa Jmm�meNaddlmLhuomsriao�aP� lAmiA �pBvtimy�acvurbhr�em�L � �ti JPmt vdN uG dM 6m em�ew dp �Wm( ad m! hluliK �Y 6e �v�R a4 v mtle�k e}J W k Emp eLM1� ffi&q�d e(a pui J 6mkLLP� �C+^ddr md dip d dv mm ➢�mpdWm�ylWmbliYl bnd�pmddeLmobuwakz 8m� rdx Pm�b �. JSa9 d YyoW s�+w� vE wuru wq �m ^- •So.stbrftv bet�c��mamma.uquia�ueefiom l8dht):Y�udme�we�@.�{^iTs� N�4�4oM1m0.lA4v1tl�Lbid[ae JhM. pal�lom6lmOs�p�m+�YGmv'sdml h'�LhYaeE�c4mYad�LmicmRP�Lf h�Ymv�Mmd�CtaSpy.s6o[a�lmdw� �b9sbm[mmlmd�C4�amv6➢��mP. [mGYmd�mHlmlatE9'mdrmhLww66 vuemGrAm�JWlf�vtY�bolmm�m J9r.mb3ofoalJcO%:�aopaHaoet PAR�} . J54eV��u.fv�sdahcr8mo' bu0ms �P meJu+mF,+%--. rmlAbwucmmtW�dCmVfe�lm4�m -Ymeb6�T tr�t�4md�6 . JNnv � m�uLu m�� pL[ mWes� u�+• J aLAm��sc�em mK Ne5 n� mu� wmem �'m��WoCnet m9'�Ya4.laa&e.�m.rAGar�mebl�af JPor�dsiandyarSpJctmbd�mmeame� WbaWedirtLlmJsbWmrlmpero(a V��A�b0em4q'iv�emyoep�w�vW P�RWEunc➢ou1k�¢YdctaAw�b�'➢mim'i P�f�Im6rmme1ml�w�bYe�mem�eba'ry. 4vic�e�ir�Tla�sfov��uY�m T4�so�P�do�saeNu � m'�S Yim AW�. douY� SYs, o[ N�m J F> d-Irad 1�0. Pd mlmda b �he mtls p� g�mf••—. ' �blee0dmwil�¢v,N�mt'v�pvyutmuv. JCm'ti�pmefivYmvelcvtm'atWmYmv10 Flltrvdns�mmdmlrmLLpiqo.co[ssiV uein.4� lipv6v6miAr.�h�lm�v�nc. J Sa ^n d opm�e a0 � m mya alu�Y W m �P �aS'. J Wym�Rup�O¢dn�cwrymObn�wsYueloy � wuLlmomeutc�amEewaO�EtrmaaNN d�aweu�Lvii J PcaW �spkw�A4m�Ftwa�p� ��s�e�xo.�.��..m�mn ad 1ptle Iob dvt J PYx M WI¢>o0camoo �eb dowvkW b �+Poo«R�yiejmmr:rmmFeA�ait[o Su �s.wwmwe�r�.��y.r�.a.� waa�.aaoem�mac�.+e.ea�nm� �rmod m..ma� mputiam0m.�.1".�.uc.mbvf� m/ey1d, IMmdvu�aca�ic�lm�ekleLaryAJ�amo" /Whm4ulmiloPP�'4LbermvbpidvpdMeplve UiealiE7cvabapmLkQaJmmwL IFcYefWeem�ria,nedw�e4blh[m�mmmm �� y�Y, d�xb=4�WmQmly'CadHo� �AIChWinlSotlW�mtbvmab�mm�a� IQe.^VNIWamn.mb�mID�x�vaapupily .1e6m1N�Em0s�c JBsy�ivL�esmmLefbiNa.amo�su�fu/E� myme[o(s�btl�l. . SSmmWdmdlumt�Qeder ��6v��r� �dmm��eumeeawim /�rvd..�a�+s�.em�.vw,a�.am+w� . tm�evr.m �amme i +^w'�wm m.mrm�..�mA.seo.a ��m�ma.mw er�'��twa YocH�eWulFTmmn9ebdLllwm�n • �dEmd4A'Dm•orm�h Q dmfA�VamsG�n�t�h +GtlydS��duaNhmtlmmWffiL.'vL�f � JNo�v u1Th^ymia.y.Raub.lo�b.e[a�� I)n�.� JNem4wMam.mbdr�a.eYadmdushr �l<6lmnma��+wmmiLL 9�1 sAsbW me�sY��a AGtl �v.9mepo0� Ouhm�� O&m a(Pm�mcy Scir� y,r�p� �LP�KL]S50[24hou�y . St�oim drain polhrters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! �Tf «:,� � • � � �• .�� .� �,:��:�, Ijij• !jlii � w. =;- -'1 - J SrLbJe {v� m6 vu�+tlmPA� fa6f�a J lLs �evl3uk Gm v dR1v bGlwn�Qvq 4Y�� J PwrcmoAok We�'�Y W1d14m�40tsc :omc�h[➢m 3wmou¢ !➢n.pstlm Y u nu0�1 f� e[�eda mmd W 4� �wda D4mamo JIIrWR�dd60o�YW 'A�ama' lsm� �dwmmtrsP�^��o[�eE W i� tl�A JPvpm� of��etl➢u�da s Emdom w�c l CoOm hm d O� �. m�t �, d ea �PmPd�l.mdm�ea ♦wm.�or.�'ea.v�om:m..;mr� �� r.a..meeaesm�.im P�e��.bleck�md�.WW�ucm�6M1 vWcGr' -��Gfv�cdippmpodP�[ avudq�dcivbN.Or,fb[tl[�Ibelml�nCw�tt m�Imd�Wm�o[b�W�s/e.m��51dm ee�m[ o�Y b 6eC ool i[yw m mOsl (mV u ��s�s••x�a'.w.en.�a,y �a.auc.»r,.amreeerea. Saq�Gec at6e w.�.�r be �a�d m rde � ��YRmI�{ihAvtm, Pa01A�omYi66]�.I YVolm�me leqdd�LMsPmdtis'rpr�l� JNc+¢� a1�tlC�ICFwmb.fpeaQ JA¢)sbm69na'a!�—' `-� Ym . hweLutlWnNwevekm0 Km4oti0G>�scu0. JA'hmmpyi��pmlo�.pslnc6l�.di�pWfrSb ��rR��M.m�-a��..e �eq�m �.cb�mmpwa�e..q�ar. � �YW56 �1bvN4 ofaP' �Ra�abeiihisMwtlrb��t�A Jhv.ldb�ce0.6adA��ei�d�mS�oy JO�e��vm�b.bdm6apdnY.Os� ��6�.u�uv+wa . swc(dmowa041bbolsw�FEe�m�ovU')bl �q a be b��14Y ok> wa D�P tlmat}m' JSe�09�YMtim�4wldr8rt4wL6me8uWlw 6a fmy ��'ve m�I8e16 Dl�t�im� m,Kg�p ocLmdommukST�� - J➢amtmmpra•Ldilyaads�CbeaWdwwim Aleue a aYr+lmuuw m mppmis�ci poy rl�. �Umyamam,utv��rc..nkene�mm.ncme mC.ppr6bveu�u.ymn,xrml�le. wr.me:.ad.�m...odor,.�;�,'yy- �..r3�..dbm..e..ieur�p..e. n.atyoti�y. � i — I ---• � � . ...�..,.., _ ,-. ,� L r � � . _ "' — —— —— ——-- --� -- . �- _ .— � �- _ _ _. � � � � .�� f1 ,� .. ,,,. �� ,a . � �� ` A • ', � � � � ■ � � - � '•,i"" � � �� , �� _ - "— , y��`� --___��'��IICl� . ..,..,� ._ F,�... �!',�! � __ _ — -- _ J Full block Front Elevation: California Drive :��„ �N.-.^-:xs=; • . �i\'Ztit��. 'r a � .. • �� P,._. .��', ` A ♦ � IMIWC/ � �� — � �,' ? � ., _ _;a�' n':., .a ,i+C+ ,.,,:�!' � Partial block Front Elevation: California Drive '" � _ �' - •� �Y.x r_' 1, � '� !� n�'b � "1 �O�t�� Y�f �� 0� � ��y*�• �� :J� r , _ � � `I� � � __ �' `�, ��._ •_�7..� �uNa�naa Ai� �.,s -� � � ' ` _ � � .�,��r,�--��?�=: � � .�� . ��. � �� pU?NAM �`� - � �� . �� E . �"� '�" �. .�..•.,:- �� 1�� ° � � _ — % - _ ._ _ - — -- — � _ . �I�K ', , �-� GMC � � . .. �, i ; - G' �' � � :\ A _ ,' -.� iw� !� ';"n:` �,- � � — `+I�� [ _ � . .. �. - _ ___ .,�.,�,..�»�_ �� ._ �� V �� APR 1 5 2011 CITY QF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. � .:� i: �. PROTOinc 1 18A Tiffany Avenue 198 California Drive : Putnam Chevrolet Facility Renovation San Francisco CA 941 10 Commercial Design Review, April 14, 2010 - - � n -. ..�.s � R ' . RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Commercial Desiqn Review for chan,.ges to the farade of an existing commercial buildinq at 198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, Burlinqame Avenue Commercial Area, 100-198 California Drive LLC, 3 California Drive, Burlinqame, CA, 94010, property owner, APN: 029-233- 080; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 13, 2011, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Commercial Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Commercial Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13"' dav of June, 2011 by the following vote: Secretary � �I - EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Commercial Design Review. 198 California Drive Effective June 23, 2011 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 15, 2011, sheets A.001 through A.005, A.101, D.201, D.301, A.201 through A.301 and solar canopy plans date stamped April 15, 2011, sheets 001 through 102; any changes to the exterior materials shall require review by the Planning Commission; 2. that the conditions of the Engineer's April 28, 2011 i Supervisor's April 25, 2011 be met; Chief Building Official's April 18, 2011 memo, the City nemo, the Fire Marshal's April 18, 2011 memo, the Parks memo and NPDES Coordinator's April 18, 2011 memo shall 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of construction plans shall approval adopted by the remain a part of all se Compliance with all con not be modified or chan Council on appeal; a building permit for construction of the project, the project be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall ts of approved plans throughout the construction process. ditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall ged without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; � E that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; • +. , EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Commercial Design Review. 198 California Drive Effective June 23, 2011 Page 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; and 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. •.. . . CITY OF BURLINGAME � � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE.PARTM.ENT, . BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - �, � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � , i', � �: _ - PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696 3790 �.�; - - www.burlingame.org _ - -��-_- _i � Site: 198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE - - � °Y r,, 2 r}a ^ . ��,rt.�.�..�'_ _� ��` `�' = The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces pUBLIC HEARING the following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 13, NOTICE 2011 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Commercial Design Review for changes to the fa�ade of an existing commercial building at 198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE zoned C-2. APN 029-233-080 Mailed: June 3, 2011 (Please refer to other side) Citv of Burlin_qame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � �,,. , �� . �� c ' � � �.y� � � ��. < , � ►, � E �° `_ + �� "� � ; �r �`�o � .., / •�.� t�� . , �.�` f /� ,r�, .d k0.�:.. � ,;� ; .�` � �% � � �., i � � � , � :�'' �� \ s� :� � � w`(i�iC'►��"� _ �„ � °*"�. i •'� .27�<< _ ' ;�� ,,, �� 'i r ` �« a, � � � � ��a � `� � � x �� "�`§,»F4 � :��y" � � h'� h ` t� �" , �4. d. �� ' ��' '/'' Q �� ?� $ ':f �" � � �$ �� ° . • r ;�� . '� ` ' � � `��, r ¢ � t. +N s Yy"➢"6 Y �'r ,4� Sb.�� °c� � , < - . s f��,r; �� f � �'?� �•u , ' �p�� ,°� `r j;�' � ' �d ' ��pp "�` �+ � ,� ��i�0. � c E � � ,� �� k��+ r� �� k � � � `� a�� , � < .��'��jo- .G ��$� - � ��0 � � � ✓p`t� . , � �,�{� �� . � ¢ :.�k� �.;� �:;� �� '" s ��'� . � �� , '"e:. * �. � "� '�_ , ` ' � � .�., "�,e g ,� � �, r � �� ` .� � �` �,� �� +�� , I .�' �� S �� .� • �i�_ e � � . �.�.:��A �::� � �+ r'i �' o `q� � # � ��, '1 im � � � ;i� � i � 'R� N � ♦ � � �I ' i � , E p a� ' �9 '�b 3 v k � s. , t k�p,'� � � , � �,s . �f! � d +0 �� • � "+� * # ,�1� �y � x �,�� y,,� � + , � . w `� � �` ,� �, ��I � �:. � ��,,�; . "� �, .'� •� , ` '� `� , � ` � -. � . r.�A � �^' � �,,r""' �'� � � � i � , � „ � 'l / � � , � r � � � �1+ � * �ae�. �' p��' � "�,...:. � � .� ��.� .�� .'�x4►,y �,'.`�,, ',r >�� , „� �,. � �.� ��,. ,� � , � � _. �a � �' s �. � �� ;� . i�� " �� . �� a.��y' � � d:. ,1 r . � � y � •"�'g � OO� 4f+RA % ��'r.;��.`��'�� * �` � � �� .,� �'� `� ,♦ � � '��'�� . ��.,�, ;�,'�. - '�:, � � � � . ,_ "�� . � _�. �'i�R '� . t�. fi� � 4�' ° .�"".�; '° n �� 4�� . � ' +� �' �'��'e , - � �� ., � .� ` �� o ;�''�T ' ��Q . . ''� . �, � ,. •` „ ,�� . � �.�`�` . J � �►� � ' ,: ' . �'�, � �. ' ° �o�'t��,�. • R + �,�� .��1 �� . _ hF �. � � • y.. ,,m° ' � 1 �M � �, '� ` °,.� � �� ., °j�� = � "�t� r �-.. �� M �� ` �'` � # � � ;� ; , ' � �''�,� \� , . �� , � � �^ . � . . i ��':; ' � i ° ^ �� .. � ,. �� '�, ��'` i�� A�,�"�j�'. ��" .� �� ,s� �. �,�� ,� � q' �, � �. a� ,�` �a� .� � '�� ,Ir'� :� , �,� ' `,'�� '°'� p �'„ �!`� � �,� k,� , � ,��,,�r�'� ' / '�, y��/ � � � � , / ,. ;�'k , � ��- *� , �� r"� �'+.l�'�y� � �� '� 7% � � + ;� , . �' 'c �, � � .� : :, � � ;�d i�� " , '� '� `` '�'� `r'�g� �'�� *�� ,� � , �� c � � ' �+� 1� � ' � � s�fi ^ � � ;l � y A. m �q ' x � - �� $ ., Ii y+� � ,�.y� A .,.�`� '_t� - � � � %. � �� p � �#.� .. � � tf 4 �� a d � �°" ' t� �� `Nv1a ` ' � ,,,, �.; '��//' {,'�-y �Y' �� r� � -�� V� a�� r� /' /'. Y 5Fy 1. - ✓ . ,J. � �� TC��. �^� � '� ,�'"?� �r� p � '� d��'� d' '� M � � ,„r° �,_ , � 4rU��,' 'P :..� A�' � � � � � ��* �� \ . �". �'t^{;'�� s� a M1k R . ��.u'.,� �j�� ✓.�� : � �`� � �� ,`�,�, , � s � t } � :� � �: -s: �''��?��: � � � • � _ �. _� �,' �. c.,� - ,�� q � Tj. TIIr . .'°a .s° *„=�. � r � { .:. �� . ,� :.: . ' ' , �� `}.. . ��.b�a ^:�`"> �� q� ,y,� �,��" i y "'3 i �'� ' �•' r'� L�'� r ' � ' ♦ �`""3� . � �� ♦ �.�� . � ' ��I' ��'i� � ° ', �+ �". � . � . ��"� � �� ;� ;a .�^�1i ♦ "�� ",�&°�''# �� jn � y�,v ,,�P�� + t %0 ,% • a i��' ,� Y �a � � ,� � � ��*`� `°� ^ �;,� � � �`�,, ; 'y�Hy� � � � �+ &'Y al c } �:. <y� P x: �,h f � s �� "� � "� ,,, �.. x � � *' � �,' � ��, ��TM�� f�� µ��'.��.uj ,,, r, �� : �� Sr � "`�, *�. y� ��;� �!�" �� , y�^ � �� • . . � � � � � ��►� �r" , � �� ,� �. � �� , .,�" ,' `� � � k �;`� �'�`; '�.� '' �,��, �» , / ,� X � 4�� a : ' �� a�� ., �� f � r. 'l �{t . � a x� � � . � 6 M1 � _ � ,�`'� t+��'i � � �'- �,�� , � �� 4 � �� F �£�� ti� � � "� } `� � �',•� �� A<. . jt.' a� : ��'" r:� d / e , �, e s:", . , ��; �'� <� � /� , dy+'�� 't e o::,,-x � '� � '� �� ,�✓ 1r �. � �i A '�"��;, ` ��e � �* � �- � � ,,��, �•� �'!,� �J� j � �,�� 4� � y��* -., � �� • � � J �"i /a �,� ;'� ' .� hadi'"b �,.. �. � � �' �y- \°�,�' � h'.,a�'.& � `� � �.y.'FfL%� � � � � � �� ' , � i q � �,.'a�N,�«NY"��Q'a�� O? i " � � � �'� � � � � � � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Unapproved Minutes June 13, 2011 VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Yie asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 3a. 1433 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ROBERT MEDAN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; FERNANDO AND UMA VELAYOS, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER 3b. 198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2 — APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO THE FA�ADE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (PUTNAM CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC., APPLICANT; PROTO ARCHITECTURE, LLP, ARCHITECT; 100- 198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Commissioner Cauchi moved approval of the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports, with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Chair Yie called fora voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Lindsfrom absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:23 p.m. 3