The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSign Exception (2) - planning type to be verified� ��,.;y � �>Ni" , , , , , , . ,:.: �.. .. .A,� �,�:t .��"� � ,:,, '�" ;;.y,;... � • � . .r,°: °:' � �� ^' a ,� M1' .�-�i:�.o _ (� 6i' � ..... �..,k:, .. � . + .. ... ��.',. � ,: .!/r , :� � CITY ,�,t• O'n BURLINGAME G� l e aG,� ; 1qp q�RqTED JUNE6� V �� /Y NY��YW Y�W�� V� l� January 24, 1991 CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 � � , � G..�--• PLANNING DEPARTMENT (415) 342-8625 Cra.ig Maynard/Martin Perez Cal.-Neon Signs Post Office Box 6325 San Jose, CA 95150 Gentlemen: Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the January 14, 1991 Planning Commission approval of your sign exception application became effective January 24, 1991. This application was to allow the addition of three new signs at 100-198 California Drive, zoned C-2, Sub Area D. The January 14, 1991 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped October 25, 1990 Sheets 1 and 3 and January 4, 1991 Sheet 2 5ite Plan; 2. that the existing pole sign at the corner of California Drive and Howard Avenue shall be removed within 30 days after a building permit for the new signs is issued; and 3. that the project shall meet Uniform Building and Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erection of the signage will require separate application to the Building Department. Sincerely yours, ��" - r :� ��--- Margaret Monroe City Planner NiM/ s cc: Lucas Dealership Group (property owner) Saturn of Burlingame Chief Building Inspector Bur�ingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 January 14, 1991 � � 'Yot coverage which was not intentional but cannot be mitigated by reducirig-�the size of the existing structure, the variance wi,�l,-not be detrimental 'to__:property or improvements in the vicin.i��y"'"and will be compatible with the area. Conditions of approv�y.-w�o�low: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the pla�s submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December.�13, 1990 except that the porch/ loggia shown on plans shall be..eli�riinated or fully enclosed and made a part of the interior floa�°•��Ian; and (2} that the project shall meet all Uniform Building-�'tid Fire Code requirements-.,as amended by the City . of Burlingame.,..-�°°w`'"'�� Motiori'was seconded by C. Kelly and approved 7-0 on roll call vote. �peal procedures were advised. 8. SIGN EXCEPTION FOR SIGN AREA AND NUMBER OF SIGNS TO ADD THREE NEW SIGNS AT 100-198 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUB AREA D Reference staff report, 1/14/91, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's letter, study meeting questions, required findings. Three conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. public hearing was closed. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Martin Perez, Cal-Neon Signs, was present. A representative of Saturn of Burlingame, the business requesting this signage, stated they are eliminating 40$ of the glass area on the showroom which will prevent any additional signage on the glass in the future, the new property owner does not expect to add more signage to the building. There were no audience comments and the C. Mink found this property is twice the size of its nearest competitor and does not have as many signs, special circumstances applicable to this property are its size and the fact that it is used by multiple dealerships in different ownerships. C. Mink moved for approval of the sign exception with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped October 25, 1990 Sheets 1 and 3 and January 4, 1991 Sheet 2 Site Plan; (2) that the existing pole sign at the corner of California Drive and Howard Avenue shall be removed within 30 days after a building permit for the new signs is issued; and (3) that the project shall meet Uniform Building and Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by C. Kelly and approved 7-0 on roll''call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 9. SPECIAL P Refer ce staff repor d ils of the requ AN INTERNATIONAL AIR CbURIER SERVICE AT 875 M-1 1/ 14 / 91; y with attachments,. CP Monroe�-re � viewed t,,,-staff review, applicant's _letters, study Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 November 26, 1990 adjacent properties, neighbors will want to know what will be in front of their homes; permission from the applicant for commissioners to go onto this property and specific directions as to where access is located. Item set for public hearing December 10, 1990 assuming all requested information is received. 2. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 BED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY AT 1117-1123 RHINETTE AVENUE, ZONED R-3 Requests: clarify references �o nonambulatory residents and ambulatory with assistance, if there is a difference what is applicant actually asking for; with 2 full time employees, 2 part time, 2 visitors and a van, and 8 parking spaces, where will they all park; it is all concrete in front, has applicant thought of softening the front with landscaping for the R-1 residents across the street; what precautions will be taken to avoid noise transfer from the Tv room into residents� rooms, what are state guidelines for STC and IPC; information on how meals will be served; see no area for a service sink or any type of storage for the facility inside the building; would like to see room dimensions labeled exactly, not rounded off, in order to have a clear understanding of size of the rooms; regarding handicapped parking stall at the front, car overhang goes over the sidewalk and someone cannot then pass in front of a car, how will this work; will meals be cooked on the premises, if so how will delivery of foodstuffs be handled; will there be any medical treatment on site, if so how will medical wastes be handled; how will they tell people to park on Rhinette and California since most people will park the closest they can to the building. Item set for public hearing December 10, 1990: 3. SIGN EXCEPTION FOR AN AWNING SIGN AT 308 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-2 SUB AREA A Requests: what is the reason for extending into the public right-of- way 5' rather than 4�; how far does the awning on the Indian restaurant next door extend over public property; explain CBI�s requirement that the awning must be retractable or collapsible or not more than 10' long. Item set for public hearing December 10, 1990. �4. SIGN EXCEPTION - 100 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUB AREA D �'�— '` Item continued to the meeting of December 10, 1990. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN AMBULANCE SERVICE AT 1616 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED M-1 Requests: how many vehicles will use this as home base, how will they be cycled in and out; how many ambulances will they have in five years, how many of these will use this as home base; do the ambulances leave from this site and go to other stations; request applicant give a verbal description of the operation at the public