HomeMy WebLinkAbout149 Pepper Avenue - Staff Report���,. c i -rv�
�
�'��'°
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 9, 2017
TO
FROM:
Planning Commission
Erika Lewit, Senior Planner
Director's Report
Meeting Date: January 9, 2017
SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN
REVIEW PROJECT AT 149 PEPPER AVENUE, ZONED R-1.
Summary: An application for Design Review for first and second story additions to an existing single
family dwelling and a Conditional Use Permit for an existing accessory structure at 149 Pepper Avenue,
zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 27, 2015 (see attached July 27, 2015
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit was issued in July of 2016 and six of the initial
Building inspections have been completed.
The originally approved project included adding a total of 479 SF at the second and lower level floors of
the existing house and enlarging the existing basement area adjacent to the lower level. With this
application, the applicant is proposing a 60 SF single story addition at the rear, left side of the first floor.
The proposed addition meets the required setbacks and will bring the lot coverage on site to 3,625 SF /
35% (where 4,092 SF / 40% is the maximum allowed) and the FAR on site to 4,456 SF/ 0.44 FAR (where
4,714 SF/ 0.46 FAR is the maximum allowed). The addition includes a plate height that will match that of
the existing house, proposed California framing for the roof, and a faux chimney feature that the architect
feels will balance the design as viewed from the rear yard.
The architect submitted originally approved and proposed floor plans and building elevations, date
stamped December 6, 2016, to show the changes to the previously approved design review project. The
architect details the proposed changes in a letter dated December 5, 2016. If the Commission feels there
is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public
hearing with direction to the applicant.
Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Explanation letter submitted by the architect, dated December 5, 2016
July 27, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Originally approved and proposed plans, date stamped December 1, 2016
1317 GRANT AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
T 415.495.6254
JAG@JAGARCH ITEC1lJRE. COM
ca.license#c�30906
www.jagarchitecture.com
TO: Attn: Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
City of Burlingame
Plan Review Comments
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame CA 94010
RE: Johnson Residence
149 Pepper Ave
Burlingame, CA 94010
APN 028-263-060
B-16-0036
12
05
16
-
December 5 , 2016
Explanation Letter
To Planning Commission,
Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to the approved permit for a Design
Review for a Front Entrance Remodel and conversion of Ground Floor crawl space to
habitable space. The proposed revision seeks to add a± 59 sf single story addition to the
back of the existing residence. The purpose of the proposed addition is to fill in an under
utilized back corner of the residence to improve the interior flow and connection to the
garden. The revisions will not change the established rear yard or side yard setback of the
home, and will match the materials and architectural character of the existing back facade.
The proposed changes will continue the existing top plate line and low slope roof overhang
detail at the back of the home and includes a small 2' wide decorative chimney element that
matches the height of the existing architectural elements at the back to "book end" the
extension to the existing low slope roof room facing the rear garden. None of the proposed
revisions will not be visible from the street. The proposed revision also seeks the removal of
an existing small side yard facing window at the back corner of the home.
Sincerely,
Jeff Alan G rd
�� CITY ��
��i��
��4
,.'w"� g�y-�
�
a
�� a��. _ 90
4POR4,F
City of Burlingame
Meeting Minutes
Planning Commission
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Monday, July 27, 2015
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
d. 149 Pepper Ave - zoned R-1 - Application for Negative Declaration and Design
Review for first and second story additions to an existing single-family dwelling and a
Conditional Use Permit for an existing accessory structure (Jeff Alan Guard, JAG
Architecture, architect and applicant; Jill and Derek Johnson, property owners (47
noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit
All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report.
Community Development Director Meeker provided an overview of the staff report.
Questions of sfaff
None.
Chair DeMartini opened the public hearing.
Jeff Gard represented the applicant.
Commission questions/comments:
> Have the revised plans been reviewed with the neighbors? (Gard: the massing of the structure has
not been changed, thereiore the plans were not shared.)
> How does the architect fee/ the design fits with the neighborhood? (Gard there is a good mix ot
styles in the neighborhood. Feels the house will bend in because it is set back from the street and will
be screened by vegetation.)
> The architecture has only changed by making it appear more Modern through the use of a standing
seam metal roof and providing more Modern windows? (Gard: yes.)
> Referenced the design reviewers comments regarding making the front elevation blend more with
the more traditional form of the mid-section of the home. (Gard: the design reviewer ultimately felt that
the design approach selected was appropriate when viewing the conditions in the field.)
Public comments:
None.
Chair DeMartini closed the public hearing.
Commission discussion:
> Fee/s there is no potential historic impact.
> Can accept the non-conforming setbacks.
> The building in rear has been in place for some time and is not problematic.
> The home presenfs a design challenge in bringing harmony between the interior and exterior design .
Still wonders whether the design fits with the neighborhood.
> The neighborhood is a mix of home sizes and styles. The key to having this design fit in will be the
landscaping. The house is set far back and the landscaping will help the property to blend.
City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 12/�5/2016
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 27, 2015
> Comes down to the neighborhood compatibility issue; the design does not fit with the neighborhood .
Blending with the interior is important, but should not drive the exterior design. Can't support the design.
> The neighborhood is eclectic. There is a strong traditional house next door though.
> Was initially concerned that the project design wasn't compatible within itself. The prior rear addition
tends to move the design towards a more Modern style. The design now harmonizes internally and with
the landscaping. Fits in with the neighborhood because of the large lot with large setbacks for
landscaping. Provides the opportunity for homes to be more unique.
> Doesn't particularly like the design, though it does hold together better now, it is still confused. The
design seems somewhat brutal.
> Also confused by the design. Expected to see something entirely different. The design review
process may have misguided the applicant. The Commission is not concerned with the interior of the
house and how it relates to the exterior.
> Doesn't fee/ that the landscaping helps to make the project blend with the neighborhood.
> Are the stair windows metal or wood? (Gard: steel-framed with wood in-fill panels.)
> Feels that the landscaping shields the home from the street. All of the homes are set far back from
the street,� because of this, the design will not impact the neighborhood.
Commissioner Gaul made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to approve the
application subject to the conditions in the staff report. Chair DeMartini asked for a roll call vote,
and the motion carried by the following vote:
City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 12H5/201 B
1317 GRANT AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCQ CA 94133
T 415.495.6254
JAG @JAGARCHITEC1l1RE COM
ca.licenseAc-30906
kHH.jagarcnitecture.com
TO: Attn: Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
City of Burlingame
Plan Review Comments
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame CA 94010
RE: Johnson Residence
149 Pepper Ave
Burlingame, CA 94010
APN 028-263-060
B-16-0036
12
05
16
—
December 5 , 2016
FROM: Jett Alan (�artl
PH: 415.495.6254
CONTENTS:
9 copies of half size sets of pro-
posed permit Revision to Permit
B-16-0036
Explanation Letter
Check for $375.00
Please find the materials needed for a proposed Revision to the approved plans for 149
Pepper Ave. Thank you for your assistance and feedback on our project.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Thank you
Jeff Alar� ard
_ µ� ��,.�
, ��. •~.�__.,. 4 ,. —'> � �,�y fa .. �`1- �
;�, C,J ; �;
_ . , :i� ��_�rl:-��I'Jls�1i�:�i:_
� _•.;.�?—f'!_.<��.r��ih�'y1..;!j. elf�,.
1317 GRANT AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
T 415.495.6254
JAG@JAGARC HITECiUR E.COM
ca.license#c-389B6
www.jagartnitecture.coa
TO: Attn: Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
City of Burlingame
Plan Review Comments
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame CA 94010
RE: Johnson Residence
149 Pepper Ave
Burlingame, CA 94010
APN 028-263-060
B-16-0036
12
05
16
�
December 5 , 2016
Explanation Letter
To Planning Commission,
Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to the approved permit was far a
Design Review for a Front Entrance Remodel and conversion of Ground Floor crawl space
to habitable space. The proposed revision seeks to add a± 59 sf single story addition to the
back of the existing residence. The purpose of the proposed addition is to fill in an under
utilized back corner of the residence to improve the interior flow and connection to the
garden. The revisions will not change the established rear yard or side yard setback of the
home, and will match the materials and architectural character of the existing back facade.
The proposed changes will continue the existing top plate line and low slope roof overhang
detail at the back of the home and will not be visible from the street. The proposed revision
also seeks the removal of an existing small side yard facing windaw at the back corner of the
home.
Sincerely,
r
Jeff Alan ard
�
�� �,� ��-.� „�� , 4 � � -F ..
� �,..� ���' �.� x � � � ., �
�\ I� �k . .
'_i �._ i. T �. i� l! { !!
�i i `,✓ :��_ ?�i.!F?I ii'�J.r�%;=�Jir=
`�;--i: r� `�� .;1P,:r` ;-�,tr
`�L., ,:_,-� E_r',. . � . a _. �_