Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout746 Linden Avenue - Staff Report (2)� , Item No. 8c Regular Action Items � � "� � � �` � , ��� � ?i!!M� �i4!x ,��, .. �� �� � A� � ..���` . � � ��i" :�"�� � � � ", `�� � ��' � �'�""� � �� ,'�- ``� , �. � ,.,. ��` � -� - � ��, � .m � >�� 3r , d""' .a '�ix, � w <. � .. . t�� �� � ���: �. � � �'+ �`' ? � /MM` $ � � ,��� , ,� , � � � �� �� g � ;'� �.� � � ,�.� � — �: � � ti ��'" ��` " ' `,� �� � ,: � ;� ����, ?� ��'� �� *' , r �i�a^ a � �' �w - � �� ,�� ,� n�,� �. 2�, ,� t � ��a �"� � °�x• „�� 4 ��{ ' � � ' `k° � �� �� ,� .� ,� ,,�,a a� , ���.� . t ' � � ` r ' ��. - . PROJECT LOCATION 746 Linden Avenue I t City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permit Address: 746 Linden Avenue Item No. 8c Regular Action Item Meeting Date: February 13, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for an attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group Property Owners: Brandy and Peter Yarema General Plan: Medium Density Residential APN: 029-061-380 Lot Area: 5,515 SF Zoning: R-2 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing one-story house and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage. The proposed house will have a total floor area of 2,796 SF (0.51 FAR) where 2,865 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemption). The proposed project is 69 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The new single family dwelling will contain four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on-site. One covered parking space is provided in the attached garage (12'-3" x 20'-3" clear interior dimensions); one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. The covered parking space is provided in an attached garage, which requires approval of a Special Permit per C.S. 25.26.035(a). All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: ■ Design Review for a new single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)); ■ Design Review for construction of a garage attached to a single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (6)); and ■ Special Permit for Attached Garage (CS 25.26.035 (a)). This space left blank intentionally. Design Review and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue 746 Linden Avenue Lot Area: 5,515 SF Plans date stam ed: Janua 18, 2017 and December 27, 2016 SETBACKS ORIGINAL PROPOSAL REVISED PROPOSAL ALLOWEDIREQUIRED (12.27.16 plans) (01.18.17 plans) Front (1sf flr): 18'-5" 18'-5" 18'-4" (block average) (2nd flr): 24'-3" 24'-3" 20'-0" _..._.._. . __ _ _ _ _ _..... ._ _...... _ Side (left): 4'-9" 4'-9" 4'-0" (right): 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" ___ _.._._ _........ _ _.. _ ......... _ ..... _..._ _ ......... _._ Rear (1st flr): 2g'-10" 28'-10" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 40'-11" 40'-11" 20'-0" _ _ _..... . _ _ _...... _........ _.._.. _._... ___ Attached 27°_11" 27'-11" 25'-0"; Special Permit' Garage: _ _ ... _ . __ _ _ __ __. _ _ _ _ __. Lot Coverage: 1774 SF 1774 SF 2206 SF 32.2% 32.2% 40% _ FAR: 2796 SF 2796 SF 2865 SF 2 0.51 FAR 0.51 FAR 0.52 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 4 --- __ . _. _.... _ _ _ _. _._. _ _. ._. _ Off-Street 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered Parking: (12'-3" x 20'-3" clear (12'-3" x 20'-3" clear (10' x 20' clear interior) interior) interior) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (g� x 20') _.... _ _......_ __ _ _�9'_x 20')......... _�9� X_2_��) _......_..__...... Building Height: 31'-6" 29'-1" 30'-0" maximum _....... _ DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 � Attached garages for single-family dwelling units require a Special Permit (CS 25.26.035 (a)). 2(0.32 x 5515) + 1,100 = 2865 SF (0.52) FAR Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Engineering, Building, Fire, Parks and Stormwater Divisions. The appiicant provided a letter of support for the proposed project signed by some of the surrounding neighbors. The Planning Division also received a letter opposing the project, from one of the adjacent neighbors. Both letters are included in the attachments to this report. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on January 9, 2017, the Commission requested that the applicant reduce plate heights and overall height of the proposed structure to comply with current code and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar (see attached January 9, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission also pointed out that the predominant pattern of garages in the neighborhood are detached garages. Commissioners did however note that the angled setback and significantly shorter lot depth in comparison to most of the lots in the neighborhood could provide some justification for an attached garage. The applicant submitted a response �etter dated January 31, 2017 and revised plans date stamped January 18, 2017 in response to the Planning Commission's comments. The plate height for the attic area has been reduced, lowering the overall height of the structure to under 30 feet (see updated Proposed Roof Plan on revised sheet 2 Design Review and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue A1.0 and updated building elevations and building section on revised A3.0 sheets). The proposed garage remains attached; the property owners have also submitted a response letter to the Planning Commission, date stamped February 1, 2017, addressing their needs for an attached garage (see Attachments). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the structure, featuring stucco siding, articulated first and second floor walls, proportional plate heights, aluminum clad wood windows, wood trim, composition shingle roofing, and sloping roofs with gable ends is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed landscape plan incorporates plants, hedges, and trees at locations to provide privacy and compatible with the existing neighborhood, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Required Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) The variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Suggested Findings for Special Permit (Attached Garage): For the following reasons, the project may be found to be compatible with the Special Permit criteria listed above: • that the proposed single-car garage complies with the off-street parking requirement for the project, side setback requirements, and exceeds the required front setback at 27'-11" where 25'-0" is required by code. • that the 22'-5" distance between the exterior wall of the proposed garage and the exterior wall of the neighboring structure provides a buffer between the two houses that respects the existing patterns of space within the neighborhood. 3 Design Review and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue • that the wood traditional style door is integrated into the architecture of the house by way of a sloping roof and that the wood trellis above the door expands the architectural relief of the connecting covered porch with wood columns, providing a well-articulated front fa�ade that complements the existing character of the neighborhood. • that trees located within the footprint of the new structure have been transplanted to other locations on the site and incorporated into the landscape plan of the proposed project, and is consistent with the City's reforestation requirements. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 27, 2016, sheets L-1 through L-5, A2.0, and date stamped January 18, 2017 sheets A1.0 and A3.0 sheets; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's October 17, 2016 and December 13, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's October 19, 2016 and December 13, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's October 21, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's November 22, 2016 and December 16, 2016 memos, and the Stormwater Division's October 19, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a bui�ding permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; � Design Review and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architecturai details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Assistant Planner c. Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group, applicant and designer Brandy and Peter Yarema, property owners Attachments: Response Letters Submitted by the Applicant • ApplicanUArchitect dated January 31, 2017 • Property Owners date stamped February 1, 2017 Signatures of support date stamped February 1, 2017 Neighbor letter of opposition date stamped February 9, 2017 January 9, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 3, 2017 Aerial Photo 5 � ����r�� e '��-.•,.._ � �� � "vr €� ._ c � o�C _ �, axo_ ���9�7�� 585 quarry road san carlcs ca 94070 www.hylanddg.com January 31, 2017 RE: 746 Linden Avenue Dear Planning Commissioners - �,` C� � � Z�1� �ITY O�- �,URt_1.!`�G�i��� �L��J-�'i_rT:t`���1?vC.� Dli/. Thank you for reviewing our project and commenting on our plans on January 9th, 2017. We have lowered the height of the building by changing the pitch of the roof. It has been reduced from an 8:12 to a 6:12 with an overall height of 29'-1" instead of 31'-6". The roof hatch has been softened to be less distracting and in addition, by lowering the pitch it reduces the amount of roof and appears to be aesthetically more pleasing. The garage remains attached and enclosed is a letter from the homeowners Brandy + Peter Yarema further explaining the importance of the attached garage to their design and lifestyle. Also attached is a neighborhood outreach notification. Sin rely, Nata 'e Hyland Hyland Design Group Brandy and Peter Yarema 746 Linden Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame Planning Commission, ������5�,����,� F�3 - � ?.�;7 CiTY Oc "t3:irZ��1�G�t,✓?c .�r��-�i_;ii'.;�1�11� v1jJ. Hello again! Peter and I wanted to thank you for taking the time to review the plans of our forever home and for giving us your feedback during the January 9th planning meeting. While we addressed the height of the house according to your recommendations, we are resubmitting the plans with the attached garage. We are aware of what the city ordinance says, but we also know there are exceptions made for valid needs and reasons. We believe our home requires such an exception due to the parking issues on our street, the unfortunate shape of our lot, my own personal medical reasons that I have decided to share, as well as for safety reasons. These reasons go beyond merely wanting a better layout or the family entertaining we plan on doing in our home. Our reasons for wanting an attached garage are quite simple. It all boils down to practicality. Parking on our street is currently a problem. With a street that is primarily duplexes, there are more cars that need to be parked than spaces available. There are many nights we have to park in front of a neighbor's house instead of our own. Then there is the overflow of vehicles we get on a daily basis from the local high school; this gets even worse on weekends or during nights of sporting events. Between too many cars already on the street, trailers, extra cars from the high school, earthquake games, parking on our street is extremely challenging. Most people on our street and in Burlingame don't park in their detached garages, either because the size of today's vehicles no longer fit in a one-car garage, they aren't able to get down the narrow driveways, or its too inconvenient too constantly move the patio furniture blocking the garage. We want a functioning garage.. We want to park in our garage and get one car off an already crowded street. Instead of having a detached garage become storage space for clutter we don't need, what we need is a working garage. The attached garage also allows for a much better layout given our lot's unfortunate and odd shape. As many of you noticed, our lot is the shape of a long parallelogram, unlike the more evenly squared/rectangle lots of our neighbors. Attaching the garage allows for a wider home with a better yard flow vs. a long narrow home with an oddly shaped yard, like we currently have. Specifically due the shape of our lot, removing the attached garage would mean we'd lose the downstairs bedroom. A main floor bedroom is necessary for Pete's elderly mom to stay with us. This layout allows us the opportunity to have her with us for weeks at a time. This is our forever home and the space for family is very important. Like all of you, we are very mindful of being stylistically consistent with our street, which is why we turned to the three- year-old new build just two doors down for inspiration. Our attached garage, like the new homes would keep with the style already present on our street. In fact, since we last met, we've had a chance to speak with some of our neighbors and they agree our home, this design, is a good thing for the block. A few have even offered to write a letter on our behalf and/or said they would attend the next planning meeting. As to not put people out, we drafted a letter for them all to sign that we'd be happy to share. We're also requesting this exception for health reasons...my health reasons. While I was hesitant to bring this up because of the personal nature involved, perhaps you need to know. In my early 20's I got in to a horrible car accident at the intersection of Chateau and Skyline — someone purposely ran a stop sign and hit me right in the driver side door (a T-bone accident). After several bruised ribs, months of inedical procedures and rehabilitation, I have been left with permanent damage to my back in the form of multiple herniated discs that will never heal. While I've been able to manage my chronic back pain through medication, physical therapy and restricted activities, I will need to undergo back surgery to fuse my disks together once I am done having children. I often experience what I call "flare ups", increased pain, muscle spasms and stiffness. Of course, cold weather is a trigger for these flare-ups (so as you can imagine, my back has not been doing great of late). Getting into a frozen car at 6AM and waiting for it to defrost can set me up for a long and painful day. This becomes a non-issue when you can park in a garage where cars don't freeze over. It will also be much easier to unload groceries and kids in a garage rather than on the street, father away from the entrance to the home. Safety is also a concern of ours. While we like to think that Burlingame is a safe town, it's seen its fair share of burglaries. I for one have been victim. While moving into 746, a local teen tried to rob my U-Haul. Luckily a police officer was patrolling the area and caught the teen inside of it. As you can image, I didn't have the best first impression of the block. My parents' home on Bellevue in Hillsborough was also burglarized within the last 3 years and we all know about the resent Apple Store robbery. The police have also been called to a neighbor`s house from time to time. With Peter traveling reguarly for work, he would rest easy, as would I, knowing that I could go in and out of a garage versus settling into the car or getting out of the car, exposed on the street. A long driveway with detached garage also lends itseff to easier access to the backyard and backdoor entry, which we're looking to avoid. As you can see, this exception is very important to us for very specific and deserving reasons. A no on the attached garage would mean starting over or even terminating our dreams of what we want in our Burlingame forever home. Burlingame is expensive and this project, the way it's currently laid out, is what will allow us to stay here. This city is important to us. It's where I grew up. It's where my family lives. It's the city we both love and where we want to build our forever home. We hope you take this in to consideration and we look forward to hearing what you have to say on February 13tn Sincerely, Brandy & Peter Yarema �� $ ;''' r� � �a � . � ��� �� ,.�' FEB — 1 2ril Re: Design Review Project 74b Linden Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame Planning Commission, C?T�' C3� �"�R�„��u���,?d vf✓�-�t�""'.rtr,i�f�i'ti.�_"� �!�d. Brandy and Peter Yarema, homeowners of 745 Linden Ave in Burlingame, shared their plans for a ne4v twa-story single family home with attached garage and i(we} are in favar of the project. The new build wiil be a nice additian ta the neighborhoad. s , ; � {,� ti�. 1 =�_ Print --- �:._.r--�--. Signature �' ���-- � ����..� ��" Address ��,�L.L i s� f��-�l�'", C' ,�- _� Cc �`��t' ��-�� t. Print � �gnature r � � j�' /.�� �.'j ���:!o� �; t r , e,�r. Acfdress �; �, i��t`� �` �'�'Cl �� l.:% -�" � � Print �� �. Signature � � �~� � �.� �� ;�-.�...� � �`�- �� �. � Address �-��; � C 1 � C� �� ,�� {'�-L:z-- � � � �,_ ��.�� .���-�' ����� ��%��. l � P ri n t P'� ,,--- � f ��-������ _ < c"`�.n � Signature ' 17 � jp `-`-• � l�� 6l � `�.-`t `� {,'�[-'_ Add.ress ,�''Y�, � �-�t1t f ��� �'-� �?���C�- , "� ;t,�. Print �, P ; , �-�- 1 � �� � � ������.� �� � ;��_. �-�_��; � �`� Signature �,� f �/, yf �� � � � c �2 t,,. �/}�...}_'��—' . ., '..'t� Address ri r s , f ��.f ' �' � '� ��'� j 1 �� 1�-C,t � P r� '��� �� � ,. ,; u F; `� r . ° � � � r � �` � ��- Si�nature � i` � i�'�{_� ��'�,���' (r,��E'�/ �'��'��'�!.�fr_' L,,� , 1 7 Adc�ress Print Signature Address Print Signature Print Signature Address Print Signature Address Print Signature Address Print Signature Address Address To the Planning Dept Feb 6, 2017 I live at 748 Linden Ave, Burlingame next to the purposed new construction at 746 Linden Ave. I have reviewed the plans and don't feel comfortable with the attached garage. This two story house with attached garage will block my morning sunlight on the entire south side of my house. At the present time there is a long drive way between our houses and their garage sits at the back of the long driveway at the end of the property. With the purposed two story house and attached garage I will have a view of the side of their two story house/garage from my bedrooms all the way back to the end of my house. I hope they can find a design that will still give us ��th the privacy and sunlight we have had all these years. Susanne McLaughlin Za��L. ����:����� �_�� o � �o�� CITY OF EURL►UGAi41E CDD-Pls,���l(��G DIV. � ciT� �.j� s�>.�. .c. �' � % :`� ";� � "Q � �4a, -° 4voawrEo�_'�.:- City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, January 9, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers c. 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2 - Application for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. (Natalie Hyland, Hyland Design Group, applicant and designer; Peter and Brandy Yarema, property owners} (51 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi All Commissioners had visited the property. Gum 731, 744 Planning Manager Gardiner provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Loftis opened the public hearing. Natalie Hyland represented the applicant, with property owners Brandy and Peter Yarema. Commission Comments/Questions: > Nas the homeowner had a chance to share fhe plans with neighborsl (Hyland: Tried but were not home. Half of the adjacent houses are rentals.) > Was a rear garage considered? (Hyland: Most houses on street are duplexes. First design had garage in the back, but it used up half of the back yard. Would rather lose the square footage and have it attached.) > Height creates signifrcant mass, any thought about reducing plate heights and tota! height to fit in with neighborhood?(Hyland: We can lower the pitch and reduce the plate herght.) > With new constuction on a flat !ot in a neighborhood mostly one-story, rt's hard io justify the height. > Has a very vertical feel. Addressing the height would be helpful. > The single family houses tend to be lower profile. > Can see the rafionale for the attached garage because the lot is not as deep as the surrounding lots. > Could garage wrdth be reduced? (Hyland: �dth is based on measurement of the owners' cars with doors opened to get out.) Public Comments: There were no comments from the public. Chair Loftis closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Handsome design. Massing is well articulated. > A lot of architectural detail on each facade. > Bringing down plate heights would be great. > Concern with the ga�age and height. > The lot size is not much smaUer than other lots in town. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 219/2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 9, 2017 > Driving through neighborhood, interaction of front of house with neighborhood and street is what you're fooking at, not lof depth. > Hard to go above 30 feet if surrounding homes are not near 30 feet. > Driveway was overly wide. > Not sure if the street tree needs to be removed. > Dark horizontal lines on roof plan is distracting. > Well organized, but should come down in height. > Angled setback makes it more cha!lenging to use the lot, requires the house to be pushed further back, so there is good argument for the attached garage. > Rendering would help, or showing the drawing with less emphasis on the roof line weights. > Splrt vote of 3-3 on attached garage. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli, to approve Discussion Item. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, Bandrapalli, Sargent, and Gaul Absent: 1 - Terrones City of Builingame Page 2 Printed on 2/9/2017 �� OURLJNGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.buriingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: �2 -/ � Q(Dl — �, $� "❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: %��O �./IvD�N �v�. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: %-i �1�� Name: -F- (J ,L� Address: �j�"✓ � uF'1 �t��% �� Address: ��(y �/`%� � �/� City/State/Zip: l�J�-i-� �A-RL� � � City/State/Zip: ��L.l1�%�1,Q1�� Phone: 110�0� �j� I � ' $7� �� Phone: l(J�� �Z"1 " ��72 E-mail: Y)A� II �� i'l �aN�G� •��'yj E-mail: I�Y'AV10� �� �. �Q j�y ARCHITECT/DESIGNER N ame: �A T� l.l �, �l�,Q 1�l D Address: �� -rj (��)�S►R�2�/ I� D City/State/Zip: _�� J�I CA R Lo s CA ��'D 7fl Phone: ___ � �5�� �J�� � l $'�o X� E-mail: IiGt�Gt Il t' �/�1� �A,Yt G�t� q• CO i'Yl Burlingame Business License #: � �� �(f-� � �����a���� C�T 1 � 2�15 CITY �� BiJ�sL;�iGAME CG�-i'L�;vN,�aG DIV. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the auth rity to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of e Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. .(Initials of Architect/Designer) �wr� - s-rz� �y PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �.I ���C7L� �Ml�,l Q,�S Ib�t�,(C� Tilr I� rr� c�f�r� I�,�,e ���4,2� c-� � AFFIDAVITISIGNATURE: I here certify pen Ity of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ApplicanYs signature: Date: � 12� �� � I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � �� . >, � � Property owner's signature: � Date: �% Date submitted: � � � � 3 ' ( � 5: � HANDOUTS�PC Applica[ion. doc ��y������� SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR: Attached Garage Exception at 746 Linden Avenue. ��T 2 � 2o�s CITY �� �U�!,N�A(�1E v`s.�Jv-iui!'�i'�iivla LJ�� 1. We would like to attached the one-car garage in order to maintain backyard space and minimize hardscape. The proposed garage reduces bulk and mass with a gable front facing roof line and trellis over the garage where there is negative space. A small window with trim for aesthetics is also located in the gabie to break up the mass and bulk. 2. The materials are stucco with siding in the gable which is craftsman style and appears to be the primary period style architecture of the neighborhood. We also propose a carriage style door and brackets. The trim around the window and garage door is craftsman style. 3. This is within the city's design guidelines because it fits into the daylight piane, does not impede on privacy or sunlight. 4. The garage has no impact on the trees. �� CITY O� �� � '� � � '� ��,� �.i: �..:. � o ,~co � a 9ro�or Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From: Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 1) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 2) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 3) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 4) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure ���ithin one foot of the property line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88) 5) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 6) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 7) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 8) 18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended—Exit terminals of inechanical draft and direct-vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2013 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the properiy line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed ar replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3") or, as an alternative, manufacturer-approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 § 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) 9) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: December 13, 2016 650 558-7270 � CITY � �� : �? � -������� 1(�Q� � w ��o Project Address Description: From Project Comments — Planning Application 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story singie family dweiling. Rick Caro Iil Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. 2) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.ener�y.ca.aov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. 3) Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 4) Place the following information on the frst page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No work allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8: DO a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 14) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88) 15) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 16) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 17) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 18)18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended—Exit terminals of inechanical draft and direct-vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2013 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the property line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed or replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3") or, as an alternative, manufacturer-approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 § 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) 19) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: October 17, 2016 650 558-7270 � UTY �� ; �� � �� , �� %�� �o . 4 Project Comments — Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: • � , , , .,a � ,.�,,,.,,,, *, � , , �� , , , ., 4. No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 4. Based on the scope of work, this is a"Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 5. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to starting work. 6. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and S:OQ p.m. 7. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 8. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. 9. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowstobay.or�/sites/default/files/Countvwide%20Pro�ram%206M P% 20PIa n%20Sheet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.or�/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 12/13/16 650-558-7245 �, ciTv p �� ; �� � ��� �� : ,� e ��o� _ � 4�pwwic Project Comrnents — Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single famil� dwelling. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. On the proposed plan, please show the location of all proposed locations for utilities (PG&E, water, sewer, and sewer cleanout). 2. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. 3. Please show how the post-construction will address the additional stormoff due to the remodel. Please be aware that no additional storm runoff is allowed from post-construction project site. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 4. Based on the scope of work, this is a"Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 5. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to starting work. 6. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. �. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. s. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. 9. Insert the `Best Management Practices', updated lune 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowstobay.or�/sites/default/files/Cauntvwide%20ProQram%20BMP%20PIan%20Sheet- lune%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flo�vsiobay.or�/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 10/19/16 650-558-7245 �, <c,rr�r , .i� �„,,; � �;� � �; � __ _ �. � � , iiiii n ��� a ryC 9� �A rco � roa�a ' Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Specia! Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From Rocque J. Yballa Fire Department Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No comment at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter or calculate with a passive purge designed system. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water laterai line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic anci fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed By: Rocque J. Yballa Date: 21 October 2016 650-558-7618 � CITY 0 �� � � � � --�.,`��' _ ti�o� '� 9row• Project Comments — Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From: Bob Disco Parks Div Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No further comments — landscape and irrigation plan completed. Checklist submitted. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Reviewed By: BD Date: 12.16.16 650.558.7333 BURUNGAME c'�rw wwi �+.. .sa ..sw Project Address: 746 Linden �ve��e, zaned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for [�.sign Review and Speciai Permits for building height a�d attached gara�e for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From: Bob Disco Parks Div Please address the following comrneMs at tt�is time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: t� � 1. Permit required from Parks Division for removal of City owned street tree. (650.558.7330). �2. No existing tree over 48 inc�es in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removeti without a Protecteti Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558- 7330). � 3. Complete Wa#er Efficien�r in Landscape Checklist (attached) The following comments do not n�d to be addressed now, but you should be aware af them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Reviewed By: BD Date: 11/22/16 650.558.7333 �, c�Tv �� � ,` � ti�� � 9noNnr� Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 746 Linden Avenue, zoned R-2, APN: 029-061-380 Description: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for building height and attached garage for a new, two-story single family dwelling. From: Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay.orq/Construction For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolvn.critz�veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: October 19, 2016 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for De_ siqn Review and Special Permit for an attached qaraqe for a new, two-story sinale familv dwellinq at 746 Linden Avenue, Zoned R-2 Brandv and Peter Yarema property owners APN� 029-061-380; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 13, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman �, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th dav of February 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue Effective February 23, 2017 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 27, 2016, sheets L-1 through L-5, A2.0, and date stamped January 18, 2017 sheets A1.0 and A3.0 sheets; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Pianning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's October 17, 2016 and December 13, 2016 memos, the Engineering Division's October 19, 2016 and December 13, 2016 memos, the Fire Division's October 21, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's November 22, 2016 and December 16, 2016 memos, and the Stormwater Division's October 19, 2016 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Pianning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visibie from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shali comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categoricai Exemption, Design Review, and Special Permit 746 Linden Avenue Effective February 23, 2017 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professionai, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to finai inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURUNGAME �v� ; '� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �' , ' ., BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '��� : ,'�-_- . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 745 LINDEN AVEtdUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, fEBRUARY 13, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Nali Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for an attached garage for a new, two-story singie family dwelling at 746 LINUEN AVENUE zaned R-2. APN 029-�61-380 Mailed: February 3, 2017 (Please refer f� other side) PUSLIC HEARING NOTICE CI �,�/ Of � U!"l lil iX� A copy of the application and p(ans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you chailenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limitzd to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additionai information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Wiiliam �v1eeker Community Development Director PLl�LIC I��AR1i�€� �UTiC� (Piease refer to ctner side) 746 Linden Avenue, R-2