The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1511 Drake Avenue - ResolutionRECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2Q11-002318 9:22 am 01I07111 R1 Fea: NO FEE Count of Pages 13 Recorded in Official Records Couniy of San Mate� Mark Church Assessor-County C1erk-Recorder II I!i �� II � II� � I!�! �II ��I' �'I I I'�I I I�' II, �if fl * R 0 0 0 1 1'I 6 6 1 �* Resolution No. 72-2010 1511 DRAKE AVENUE — 026-033-080 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct � document it purports to be, the original of which off ce. � Date: Willia December 3, 20 l'" �,.. '� � �r, ommunity De� r � �y�h�#�:m v�y .. �. � � '� �� : �i �- , �, -.�� i a' ' i , .Vy` � , z �,`��,; >� � �orr�# tl�rect�r '.�..T ,, �,, � �� `� RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGIV REVIEW AND VARIANCES RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and appiication has been made for Design Review and Variances for floor area ratio and covered parking space width for conversion of lower level crawl space to habitable space and other improvements to an existinq sinqle familv dwelling at 1511 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, Jon and Kate Herstain, property owners. APN: 026-033-080: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Pianning Commission of the City of Buriingame on November 22, 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the sfaff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above wili have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of mare than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said Design Review and Variances are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Variances are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. - �� ' Chairma ' �`� '. - I, �.-T' ��y� � r��'.`� �� , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlin�ame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a reg�:lar n-,eetirg of t�e Plann;ny �orr�miss;�^ heid �n +,hA ?2nd day of Ncvember, 2p1p by the foliowing vote: 1511 DRAKE AVENUE - RESO 72-2010 � ,, AYES: Auran, Cauchi, Gaul, Vistica, �fie `�°'�+� �' NOES: None � � �''� '��` � A8SENT: Terrones `��" SeCrziary RECUSE: Lindstrom EXHIBIT �ia°° Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption Design Review and Variances. 1511 Drake Avenue Effective December 2, 2010 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped November 10, 2010, sheets A-1.1 through A-3.3; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Pianning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would ir,clude adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 12, 2010, September 30, 2010 and August 5, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's August 6, 2010 memo, the Parks Supervisor's August 9, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's August 9, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's August 4, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Floor Area Ratio Variance and Parking Variance, as wefl as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or rem�val of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shali be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adapted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall rn�m�!!l a ra�t ef a!! sets of a�proved �lars thre�ghout the c�nstr�:ction pr�cess. Compliance with a!I conditions oi approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and ilues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and instalied on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be in�luded and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to sabmit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recyciing requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption Design Review and Variances. 1511 Drake Avenue Effective December 2, 2010 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURlNG THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural detaiis shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are buiit as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shali shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been buiit according to the approved Planning and Building plans.