The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1452 Drake Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Design Review Amendment �. Address: 1452 Drake Avenue Item No. �� Action Item Meeting Date: 9/14/09 Request: Design Review Amendment for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two story single family dwelling and attached garage. Applicant and Architect: TRG Architects APN: 026-042-140 Property Owner: Ginkgo Burlingame LLC Lot Area: 6000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. History: On February 23, 2009, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review and Special Permits for declining height envelope, attached garage and basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an attached garage at 1452 Drake Avenue, Zoned R-1 (February 23, 2009, Planning Commission Minutes). A building permit was issued on April 13, 2009 and construction is underway. Proposed Revisions: The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, Zoned R-1. The applicant is requesting the following changes: 1. Change in roofing material from composition shingle to Japanese-style clay tile (see revised building elevations, sample photograph and detail sheet, date stamped August 31, 2009). 2. Change in exterior material from a combination of horizontal siding and smooth stucco to hand troweled integral color plaster (see revised building elevations, date stamped August 31, 2009). The applicant submitted a letter, dated August 31, 2009, explaining the reasons for the proposed changes. Other than the changes to the roofing material and siding, there are no changes to the design of the house. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review Amendment for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two story single family dwelling and attached garage. Summary of Previously Approved Project: The applicant is proposing to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and attached one-car garage. The proposed house and attached garage will have a total floor area of 3,014 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3,020 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed project is 6 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The project includes an attached garage which provides one covered parking space (12' x 20' clear interior dimensions) for the proposed four-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: • Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and attached garage (CS 25.57.010); ■ Special Permit for declining height envelope (105 SF along the left side and 31 SF along the right side extend beyond the declining height envelope) (CS 25.28.075); Design Review Amendment ■ Special Permit for attached garage (CS 25.28.035, a); and 1452 Drake Avenue ■ Special Permit for a new basement with an interior ceiling height greater than 6'-6" (8'-10" proposed) (CS 25.28.035, f). 1452 Drake Avenue Lot Area: 6000 SF Plans Date Stam ed: Janua 30, 2009 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Setbacks Garage: 31'-0" 25'-0" Front (1Sf flr): 22'-0" (bay window exempt) 22'-0" (block average) (2"d flr): 22'-0" 20'-0" __. _. _ __....... _.... _...._. Side (right): 5'-4" 4'-0" (leff): 6'-9" 4'-0" ......... . __. Rear(15f flr): 38'-8" (to deck) 15'-0" (2"°' flr): 43'-8" (to deck) 20'-0" _._. _........ _..... _ . . . ........:........ _. . .... Lot Coverage: 1869 SF 2400 SF 31.1 % 40% _ _. _ _. _. _.. _. . _ _ FAR: 3014 SF 3020 SF' 0.50 FAR 0.50 FAR _ .......................... _ __ .......... _. # of bedrooms: 4 --- __ ....... _ ..... .. . .__.. _. .�. ....... _ _ Garage: attached Z ; special permit req'd for att. garage _.._.. � _ . _.._ _ _....... _.. Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (12' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _ .. __ _ . _. ... Height: 24'-11 " 30'-0" _........ . ...... _. DH Envelope: extends beyond DH envelope 3 CS 25.28.075 ___.._ . _...... _.... � .. ....._ _.... _._.... Basement: basement with 8'-10" ceiling special permit required for height 4 basement with ceiling height greater than 6'-6" ' (0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1,100 SF = 3020SF (0.50 FAR) Z Special Permit for attached garage (CS 25.28.035, a). 3 Special Permit for declining height envelope (105 SF along the left side and 31 SF along the right side extend beyond the declining height envelope) (CS 25.28.075). 4 Special Permit for a new basement with an interior ceiling height greater than 6'-6" (8'-10" proposed) (CS 25.28.035, f). Staff Comments: See attached memos for the originally approved project from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Planning staff would note that because of the nature of the request to change the roofing material and siding, it was determined that this request could be brought forward directly as an action item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be continued with direction to the applicant. E Design Review Amendment 1452 Drake Avenue Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action shou�d include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly forthe record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 31, 2009, sheets A1.1, A2.3, A3.1 through A3.3 and detail sheets for the clay tile roofing; 2. that the shower stall in the basement shall only be allowed in conjunction with a sauna in the basement and shall be built to the size, configuration and location as shown on the Basement Plan, sheet A2.0; that any changes to the size, configuration or location of the shower stall shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission review; that if the sauna is not built as part of the project a shower stall shal► not be allowed in the basement. The waste line from the shower shall not exceed 2" in diameter, or the minimum required for a shower, whichever is less; 3. that if the sauna is ever removed or eliminated in the future, the shower stall shall also be removed or eliminated along with the sauna; 4. that the landscaping on the right side of the structure shall be revised to include more pervious materials and less hardscape; 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 9, 2009 and September 26, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's October 16, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's February 9, 2009 and September 29, 2008 memos, and NPDES Coordinator's September 29, 2008 memos shall be met; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 3 Design Review Amendment 1452 Drake Avenue 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shali not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 14. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Randy Grange, architect i� Design Review Amendment Attachments: February 23, 2009 Planning Commission Minutes ApplicanYs letter of explanation, dated August 31, 2009 Application to the Planning Commission (from previous application) Staff Comments (from previous application) Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 4, 2009 Aerial Photo 1452 Drake Avenue 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Approved Minutes February 23, 2009 2. 1452 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR BASEMENT, DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND GINKGO BURLINGAME LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated February 23, 2009, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Sixteen (16) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Commission comments: W ill consideration of the shower with a sauna set a precedent for future requests of the same nature (Meeker— explained rationale for suggesting it may be an appropriate feature with this application). Asked if the Building Division has reviewed the basement plans (Meeker — yes). Randy Grange, 205 Park Road; represented the applicant. Additional Commission comments: ■ Right side landscape plan; feels like the walkway is too heavy; could pavers be set in the lawn (Grange — yes, this can be done). • What is the material used for the spark arrester (Grange — copper). ■ Does the sewer line run to the rear of the property (Grange — yes); would be concerned about the potential for back-up from the below-grade shower (Grange — the sewer line is deeper than the shower). ■ Is there a concern about moisture in the basement near the sauna (Grange — there is adequate ventilation with windows in the basement and other ventilation). If there is a lot of fan ventilation, there could be noise to disturb the neighbors (Grange — shouldn't be any different from having it on the main living level). • Could ventilate the sauna area remotely to the roof. Public comments: Mary Martocci, 1448 Drake Avenue, spoke: Concerned about any change in height. Asked if adding the basement changes the right-side elevation (Grange — no). There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Further Commission comments: The design does not fit with the neighborhood. The application is approvable; conforms much more to the traditional style. There is a variety of styles present on the street. Commissioner Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: E CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes February 23, 2009 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 30, 2009, sheets A1.1, A2.0, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2 and L-1; 2. that the shower stall in the basement shall only be allowed in conjunction with a sauna in the basement and shall be built to the size, configuration and location as shown on the Basement Plan, sheet A2.0; that any changes to the size, configuration or location of the shower stall shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission review; that if the sauna is not built as part of the project a shower stall shall not be allowed in the basement. The waste line from the shower shall not exceed 2" in diameter, or the minimum required for a shower, whichever is less; 3. that if the sauna is ever removed or eliminated in the future, the shower stall shall also be removed or eliminated along with the sauna; 4. that the landscaping on the right side of the structure shall be revised to include more pervious materials and less hardscape; 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 9, 2009 and September 26, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's October 16, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's February 9, 2009 and September 29, 2008 memos, and NPDES Coordinator's September 29, 2008 memos shall be met; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a caver sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; � CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes February 23, 2009 13. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 14. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: ■ CommissionerAuran indicated that he would not support the application; another style is possible that would be more compatible with the neighborhood; should discourage the prominentgarage and canting the house on the lot. ■ The shower with the sauna could be problematic. • Have seen a number of basement showers that have been reviewed in the past that are associated with recreation rooms; the presence of the sauna makes it more of an exercise room; it is appropriate in this instance; not concerned about moisture and drainage. ■ Restrict the size of the waste line to prevent the connection of a toilet. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 4-2-1 (Commissioners Cauchi and Auran dissenting, Commissioner Lindstrom absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:36 p.m. 7 August 31, 2009 Plannin� Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 9401 Q Re: 1452 Drake Ave. Dear Commissioner, The home at 1452 Drake Ave. is currently under construction, and as with many custom home projects, design ideas and preferences continue to develop and solidify throughout the process. At this time, two material modifications are being proposed. The first is replacement of the asphalt composition shingles wit�, tile. This is not Spanish clay tile, but the grey, Japanese tile shape that is historically consistent with high end Asian influenced Craftsman homes. This is a significant upgrade over the approved roof material. The second is changing the horizontal siding to a hand troweled integral color plaster. This material has an "old world" look and is also historically consistent with Asian influenced Craftsman homes, and reduces long term maintenance. With the front of the house facing West, stained wood siding would quickly grey and age; painting the siding to avoid the graying would not achieve the desired natural look. Thanks for taking the time to review this project once again, and we hope you will find the proposed revisions acceptable. �in�rely, �,.... , ,;rp;. �.�.....�._---� � � ��. ; .:�andy Grange AIA City of Burlingame Planning Department SC 1 Primrose Road P(650} 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.ore ��;�' c � TY o� BURLINGAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �R � Type of application: Design Review 1� Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: � �� -�-� � .� �� a�-�� APPLICANT Name:� Address:�.0 City/State/Zip: Phone (w):� (h): (��? L�`�I��°�� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: � � �� Address: � �� y��=� ��'>�. �� (h): (�: 65c�.3Q�. R�D� City/State/Zip: Please indicate with an asterisk * Phone (w): the contact person for this project. �h�: �i' tYl �Li�k C,�r�S S .� �� _ �`.� _ _�r: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /�'CiW ��5��3`,�-� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and corre to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: � Date: �� I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above appiicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ! r C, ,; _ �` � � � � � � �J Property owner's signature: ' -,� _ __ _ ��`'�'�� Date: �' :� � Date submitted: PROPERTY OWNER Name: �✓r'� ��.1-L� ► a _ �� Address: �. � , �L}��, i �p��ity/State/Zip: r� ► �i � Phone (w): (� • �D C) PCAPP.FRM � �� Project Comments � Date: To: From: February 4, 2009 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7279 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 CI City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for declining height envelope, attached garage and basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-042- 140 Staff Review: Basement Comments: Provide one emergency escape and egress from each sleepinq room in the basement area. Sec. 1026.1. On the plans provide details for the window well as required by Sec. 1025 and for the required ladder access from this area as described in Sec. 1026.5 Provide complete details for a guardrail around this opening at grade level. All other comments as noted on the review dated 9-26-08 apply. Reviewed by: -- �r_--� � ; -� Date: � �, > _ � �� -------P , - -� ; ;, - , , , Praject Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: September 25, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review and Special Permits for attached garage and declining height envelope for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-042-140 September 29, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 20Q7 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines. 5) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 6) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non- residential buildings. Go to http:!/www.enerqy.ca.pov/title24 for publications and details. 7) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 8) On the p�ans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 9) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. Note: The area labeled "Dem/Office" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 10) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 11) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 12) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 13) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 n� �, , Reviewed Date: �''/a21�.��; / Project Comments Date: � From: September 25, 2008 d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Ghief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558- 7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff , Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for attached garage and declining height envelope for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-042-140 Staff Review: September 29, 2008 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. This project is subject to the City policy to maximize the planter strip. The new sidewalk is required to be constructed to the property line and transition to the existing sidewalks on both adjacent properties. Both the site and landscape plans need to be revised to meet this requirement. Reviewed by: V V Date: 10/16/2008 PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR'I'MENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS � � �� Project Name: ��= '��"'`f� �'�'�'u-� Project Address: �� 1�'$�� ti The following requirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land . surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) -��z� ,�e.t.�,�s -iv � �t �:�-�p i�r� �.�t,� Pb 7 �� u Gc.��tc��'i �.c � �,�t,�-�E� �r,�N� 2 �_ The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 ��tary sewer lateral tE� is required for the project in accardance with the City's standards. ( ) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront BikelPedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the praject generated impacts and recommend mitigation rneasures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public ��orks Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and Iot iines proposed by ihe map. Fage 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUI3LIC WQRKS I)EPARTMENT ENGINEERIl�G DIVISIOlY 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 �_ The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the proj ect may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Aimy Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No constnzction dPbris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 �_ The project shall comply u�ith the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway di-nensi�r�s. �lso �lar:fy if t:�e project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to Ciry �ngineer's approval. 22 The plar�s c�� rot indicate the slc�e ef t:�e ��i rTe�,��ay, re-su�mit plar:s showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTlYI�IvTT El\tGINEE�NG DIVISIOl� 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc Project Cornments Date: To: From February 4, 2009 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7279 [d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for declining height envelope, attached garage and basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-042- 140 Staff Review: Comments remain the same... Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � f� � Date: g��,�p,� � � �Pro�ect Commen#s Date: 1� From Subject: Staff Review: September 25, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review and Special Permits for attached garage and declining height envelope for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-042-140 September 29, 2008 Provide a residentia! fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/doubie check valve assembly - Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by:'=�� '-`- Date: �� -�� Project Comments Date: � From September 25, 2008 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 55$-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permits for attached garage and declining height envelope for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: Q26-042-140 Staff Review: September 29, 2008 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Include a list of BMPs and erosion and sediment control measure plan as project notes when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochures for guidance. .�- Reviewed by: �, Date: 09/29/2008 �� ,�,N ��:s��.�a��, ,�^�,Vx,� ' s ro��u�a� P�c�cano� r�ognm �, r� �r � ��.nN / .x d�� ,:; �-,: , ��` ,-;'�� , }� .,, ; ; ' ` `7.` ' C'ieneral ��'*�' Construction & Sit� Supervision ��w�:��n�; �,o �,ary ��. a ��a�.re��K«�„a, Wo�� ti�� °" Jinwvt. ann p�atecl eta.m E.ame �n ue..<mIH o(tfi. IRMrm�o�4lw�qumGw v,cpmW�. lCov�+olrle rvoa6cm (�pa �ws��farimi)b�u+i�bowsfarrcnpo- npaw tl iFa s t-WRedue wo0+ e1« ea W cons em�wv��c�eck �amz or Nnn.s wMrt J'ryn��yw c.�0^qee trartory z md auM1con Wnc wnrhz a� IM1< �-. Iufinu� eW.c�nha�ia� alrou� N� n�w �w .� e re��ov, m:.Rn+�a,m�i nn. Gvctl hau leepug pneoea �nmwx � �o��h cw,�m .R. ro. mw urk�ry;.n�eh'ct� nf =I�v6 �� a ve eq 3e da�pa�cd arcn rhwld Ue we�way fiam sheew or �m`m Anw mleh �ud beemod if oso- rx�ee�w. �u�o� 2w�P ��rt �a�. p ma�e�i.i: on� or ie. �- pn.�o� �woQ �nn.mWxwiih�leo�ucsncawa 6er n( J%ecpcpoll �a�n oH e,paud �wfacn. Mvice rtesb m a v e � ' �qrtx ' ewwu-e !Dry swaep OarN sufaca Wa Jrwv m eW�m Na�a�. �r.ek' wOwne c�Yrr... 5 . aUnwlluLwlv�v raAu4u.,v �+I.Wi.cmvrl JCloev up Imte, d.fp� md o9�m.ptlle immeNUWy� ' „u �� w.��...k�,�� w.� ��a� o�, �re�a �r..a. u.,� mr d.+mm ��mnd� n.t ' .a�auH...uh�R �,wW i4 ��Jw�. JCare d'' dvmyn<n Check frcmKUUy for lutr i'1 A. P. .�crmo'.�r w-c �- �ry.� J��m e�.Aolaxe �in�r m�eMede r M1.�Nc.<.�c�n wi a.l�pno Mminp il aav�� Oo Oie ronnbucl�op ¢1h. b fMake N bl m�le ' Iaimd w¢�wd rttlaµ. fprvperkCM1<c 'I¢ yiwr r �ks_ ��ven,w� �u;as .,�ri� a o.,-m',�;mi,....«..hm yw o.a�. �ro.,.�,. omR owr wa �mi ro� �tta � J `�� 1 espMi�. cnPm�l.lk �duPen rvH�.�.gc atme.rWa� .�.� :,aK, a, �:_+. � „w� JDAbPOx� mGEamoli�looUeb�P�PFh� l �e� bssM F^mrS ehKJe Uwdr, rn aryM1u� ml, aW cl�veJ `e or divwsN ��s„�a�o.o�<..<to.U�=�d: ° Stormwater Pollurion Prevention Program Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to dv the j ob right! Rmio Cf from streets aud othec paved areas is a major source ofpollution iu local creeks, Sau F�aucisco ,Bay aud tlie Pacific Ocean. Construction activities cau directly aflect the health of our waters untess co�tractors and crews pl an aliead to keep dirt, debris, and other constructionwaste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater ordinauce requirements. Remember, ongoing moiutoring audmaivtenanee of instalted controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth-Moving Roadwork & Paving F resh Concrete Painting & Application Equip�nent Acriviti�s & Mortas Application of Solvents & Adhesives Operation Q I Stm pLwm�C mdymr000rc rob/clv mtl�uwu Jlb¢�puu vmmp�tte a�nW av 11x. m- w�i• �mdnmjnk�.a ro..,�ro�aw��rv� � v�R.ar �r��...�e��.� veWcleao�pwpmrn� man�manu. J Fla.�a�+ll ve6�ela aIw nn.> ea�upmrn�.lurycc� fR- T,�my mr w�cv.v k.ta. I Per[mwma�maaml�wiu rzpaujabt,enE vehicicavA _� w e n .. JI'� " 6vmuwmt � - . �rie 0 . p c1oJe b d' M. l C I, ifluib..4me n � end � wtcnc.� po blc o. �1' f�wixu�Nwix�ose. / �o �o� �ro di�gel oil m luban�a m clmn u��npwon� or ooro. � v�r�io��Aa,wmiew.m�.. ✓h m wui: ��dcwr mem m.y n�en ow "tlirty pavemmeormp<�mnble n hnwn,n� - a i.. mr=�.�mmn� oS(+bv+ten�m.�m.l.,u tin..-e,aedmm5e)x6.vc.�r m,s ei� m�.� �.. iw ea*we w � �. ausia�«��. �� ma�r „�aw. ��w�r u�r�� . � \ w n �n�r� �v FvryNrcm. [ . pae�ble fi�r tl�w <ont�oL �c. ' e e�r m�ry . a. r oe.m,�ae u. � J x �'( �n Aeiy�. .iue q+ ' �d-meiy11Yoauerwu4edMloam�orze 11 �igulthme�ckaea o[Le}mUw em�erWe.IveNU�� u.'ro.�we m�a�uu�rouow�os,a�� uo�v ��Mrrt+n��,m,nv. =)c�u m� co � �: omu o��<m s�.i� w�um¢ Ccnmr. (x(p�HSt-)'�5� (34 bmus) �1 "...'r, �?.9R"�"r.s�=:i,d�ij",y�ff�"�,�..dL� J�x•r�apmnwiulemcmcros�oNuwmeo��anmripws�or roarlwvvcmTnWmmh. I Sd�edW<.sw�-anan anE sradi"�s w�rk tw dry wnlM1er. 0.�.�.6 Covw�iioe J(T.<Naliu�wrmen�[orliak�uxiiry+eirlcaNingequipmrni JRd .. x x��•WJr untwlw Y JV. v u .�3.a�6iuFote�wp � m il+e w . �wn r ��. - ��«��wee sottfarwhvenm�eu�noouuacimmu4vcyplvinMu d �e.denpuv wplan.lY«emi�..Jwen�..�Y sim b:tiie mQ c22c+_ �r�., -„a�.U.�,�.�,,,�, �n�mo�m�-eoumwnnnmo,�i.mw�c �o, „�m h�r eaia. amwmnn�i�.,ee,a.,w�am „o rt�«�,b��mam�ia�d.znWr6l�m. � dcµbai�eneycoocrtie,bmke ryRLte�c. a�C�}r�ererPo+ bk. iow�nm:a.w�o�a�o-.n�.ma;.<nw�oa..o�oa..�.,.a- �n,m.w�i�rvem��em�.,�n�,�N.msro..,�y�eu,. ��am,m n.,c�a ��.. � a."v-;> , oK -� x,aama r.;,�r r�w��+�. ! Kcep all IIPJA Oun� v�tl�ctn mE ms�m ewny Lom paera/ Huemev An�tlar� ihe gune5 Me�, �vJ nom Uni.re i;qu:� rz.n0a�. bom Jtic�ea�ymi.yad.o�Nccau�w:iixa�nc..nvvYs�mm Paiou.J�i��e�.s.avl.m�.dlu�.w.IJmuiunb.��tx.rt m n M��t a �, m..m �� r.o,�m rro � ed.�to�n ss fim,d m�x a�rvor�a . cw�m�: .+eSu ao+oofLPm��tlrym.+�mbfiam..wd w i o� clrylc ciy�wl nlmm�...er 0 �2 �I ll ��ky��,a�,�.�.,.a�ua;maa�.e�nam .r�.��xro,or��no� ��.iu�m � � ��m��,rmti, N.��u=w+=orwu�� H��«000��eo�.a b �.Ram,u��no r �m<mKxa� Jcoil«aoa:�,im��ew�uem�eo��swn�.wirme ue.Ma.ra.mfi.;n.an eea��nUe.. .m. 'F ,.�� I =4�osu'� mlba`eAP�UU�uf�twn es�oWen� �Pmpc imemJuwowoall�ros�ousudsalim�ui !V M1ee\Eem;�� Fo �+nYW�L�nin�uitTmun�l ��oConrwN h � mapNpno- roew,. �w • oaers �m� o�«��m.,orM��u f� � U� ma. � v.n.wo::or�x�� I FOVrtlyrtyelfiilurtsoterox�eoantlzCwwltAotrols ! r a1&vrn<.PoaE ��•e'n�ayVm q� �eWmW.ua�La�vdwvw�vie. �FSre�ieem� �m.in..i.�r......,��n��ry i �a�a��m.oa�.+oo.�m�uw�..ti >, , �..,, �s��v�e�n�.m�im;:.,��o.r.,.�e�rvrv� !('o.ns�a�knil..mdo�bc�rnnan,ctiwmterial�a��h �aycloiAu. nl8ow �Pn<n y�.P��eviG�w�ufWlu�Jv�.� wwRw�t JN^ceoc �ef�udn� x�dev�a6co �s.mw «.,». -ee d w. ,r r� r�w> �rowo�yr �r, R o�.,vi� .nao so n�.�� , ,,.an rM o o a�.� �. oi e� a �.. � o, �� - �cm�eaaa.wmo,.,��,riam�ra+a.o�.n.om��m.mwt � a.:.��.x�„��m,�,��. �r�i„�,.,�iMro�m��„-��..,Mrm,mme'�nn�� toow.��,��.)v�2 .b i,�.,.��.�a�,� fC IsOills.Ml k .`dry'meAodx(e�m� JI4e�rn��iF0.rcpa� � fi d��yF.�o.00sw.yiov lWhm�efiu4�oc " � s� . h m��enaLr..R.), d„ V�drewovecovrvn cnnasmrmA ve.µ,.eicpn.:waahimodm W>�u �.��tiuc �e�etybemvd.+rcawaY J(�Ik�.ndm.� rve� spv. ofe�c.an nrva.an�I.�AcuiioNrt. g'" �v � J P ac or o ¢m, Oornvlq+c �o �a�ooi�..�.�i�i��b„�,i.�.�i., v � o P . � �i -.no wn��Ma,«wok,m,a�n�mm �y�.�m��u,�y,�g .,.�,�.m. r�n, ,�,r.. AfreLlmmil�otlP�dMR�uedwarcrtLm�malbcea ;� �+eeRem�ml"`nen� ,Jwg pLalae�on JWFm ,.k E �� '.Mrrem��F �in1114��r ,�md. �. hm If w�y uL Wex ivo�:'u .. = c.drs. ...I, ta.� fi.. iyu xwl m v mu uiepae� p�apu W. ^ .na�o.,�.�m,xn:+��wv.,Q�ei�n��ow wow: � i_ .,,,,,o��d�.��u � x�.>a� �ve=�ww_, m nw« ��o�.��,�. iwctiu. �n,A,r .a o.o�WM, �M'�'°"P�nmeon.��m��ao�.no��om��ocooeavm AFv�douM o-eLLr a�a �'� ,�fa �vnaC e.5�o. I✓�� uf smvll ��wo oPaxi e�v Ay wna� a groui . ew;.�e w.m: e��, o, w��. w<�.m�.y am��.�a �«��oK aom m., �� J;1.r�L�u�J�wuv�n�n�.k-..��V�ru�li�JiW�.Une.4y Jrv..e.b��rw+l'Nw4v.u.iws�.x�<w.�ri:.�. . =o �=mo�,. Landscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance � � a J Prw Ey sWn ¢�IL�MMuvEee Imp� m��w D�asl¢ Nrclin¢. J Swrc pe�uirb, lvutvcn, mJ �Mn.:LeuucJ� oJuun ur /Fl.��uvu�mudn' .a MYdileiMmufil,awt� /RMgete e ua �v� �ceLLm� form of �mnou �oouol [ar GedsuD�^�� b+/nim �ux� �-�a�ane%�vc..a- -� . � ��.,�ro�.,,,,n � ��c�nwKai�Ya � u„p,n� o� ��m v�+K;x... mnwo� a>.h. ! CAevu �1 pIXawi m:9p�g rc��bre nn s a� n !�011 .�A sW o c4pp'mp, �.. md mv punl� puen dmmB �o�tri0uhi mn p,Vl�hp f�a¢wy �Mw p nnm,a�i'h�Ai�wdo£ N+wNai . JM��pLccya�lw 'og n.lnrv� n"i� JWLm orcl�uwvx�u��Ewg ��TL�eL� �rtbxa vs � W i t4�� uWF,� inp �¢bla� s .Vn orpn�.u+yryro<�l.�g<or +n<n0.nk uuJqmlc .� d� ��W �, � � ��+6u�Ifii�Ra c ry Y wu.ie. uu�4� fi d '[ �vmliea�rno um , m) b� � c� ud tlipo�e I Do oot blow er rak� leawaro, ett. �aro ��ezt. na trta � �< «e iulLo�i inwkop�edeciv�n. loal/FauunWSOaF(unhvane� Y �t+�...ti.�e„az�n��_,;.._�.. ._i,.,�-...�. ..n�W�.kro.e.y�ao-aem,�.aw�,u�. ,...�,.U,w. ` Jn�:mnn�a.,w�,wm��w.5wv r op. �wne�e��m�e,rooi.Fwi��,.n r �ro WL<�U�.v.�.e�L�n.bWYyY.�wa�>P�u�..w�.e.l �MY�.lh�n��exck.nubr�LaWnp�g. � x6n, ap mA Ump clmhv vuy be Gav�feQ of rs ¢sr� I�mLrc�ed m.� ar tlniu We J«NonwkJweta ro e zro�m begewauwarylmEl'Jl, tr,�n. �x.,.Ki<r�o.�ou-eu�ev.� ewK«oi�,:umw. �cniom,. u.mrn�i eT�e �rm�u�s,i„ec .a�mweM�:., . �(;r,��<nMm�w,�,i �ir)nr ��oysw.r�o�m«y.��,x.�,o�o��i.,ma �j��- Jfn:My,Fnvmmnmul(�IrsI�iFllm�amm�N�Unqrccy�lin�e aV". �mharenlounrvax�cAlmoeel. . JDonotunmppv.LnadJ�:d¢(:��aldy�MiW Storm dra.in polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! 'o�°°:�"�.°�°`�°, �°'�m' p"�� ry �'m�°�"'�.°"m'"�� °.�°��°m°° .@cc�.�6iLa�.o wnkY�tin¢ib"M^,� w Ple y �dbYW�e �6 �yl _ _ _ Guck policY. lP�in�cFp�a�Cusiflam ¢.banNo��sdryshiDP�6 eM eand blann c.�ilca6 �u vWuc �'P clellu auC msvosed o[.v�tru1 � ! Sciva b�C: nlesm�. i uflu Ney u: m. B.� zwc b Y.:�� n a eMA m amF� ralv�N- wiuA.blo��arvmco��+J.+away4ameuum.�ro�m �en�rleuap , n1xll,waninnR. JNav M1mrhe ncrsmme JSCI�eUWcS�aA�ywvlc�u�n� � � ��rdryw..�tl��r. e Rv ec mam Etin. o�vaiv��nlw ! u'.�6 w<<mue�e mucrc oN>' w �LaN+w�v�J �vusE.wi v� ! Llae �unPunry cb.�<k.lam� �n ilirchs I� dive�n nnn;l'av�.y m^owr,�n .n�.. m wi nw �.,� � r��... �-eMmo .� ., a.w� �� sN,�, �o �..�� r��o� n�� m,�,�. ��Axn. u�Ainln� icM1M i�r{n.��. sTlcoR�owlW<sew�yx wutuvepaina�l WHY SHOULD WB WORRY ABOUT SOIL EROSION? — . • • � Water and wind carry soil from our Bay Area land down into our streams, Iakes and the Bay. This soil carries with it pollu- tants such as oiI and grease, chemicals, fertilizers, animal wastes arid bacteria, which threaten our water quality. Such erosion also costs the home construction industry, Iocal government, and the homeowner untold millions of dollars a year. Nature slowfy wears away Iand, but human activities such ; construction increase the rate of erosion 200, even 2,000 tim� that amount. When we remove vegetation or other objects th hold soil in place, we expose it to the action of wind and wat and increase its chances of eroding. The Ioss of soil from a construction site results in Ioss of topsc minerals and nutrients, and it causes ugly cuts and guliies in tf Iandscape. Surface runoff and the materials it carries with it cIc our culverts, flood channels and streams. Sometimes it destro� wildlife and damages recreational areas such as fakes and r servoirs. As an example, road and home building in the Oakland Izi1I above Lake Temescal filled the lake to such an extent that it ha� to be dredged in 1979 at a public cost of $750,000. NEED MORE INFORMA?ION? ABAG fias produced a slide/tape show on soil erosion called "Money Down the Drain." It is available for showing to any interested group. Ca11 ABAG Public Affairs at (415) 841-9730. ABAG has also published a"Manual of Standards for Sur- face Runoff Control Measures" which deals extensively with designs and practices for erosion prevention, sedi- ment control, and control of urban runoff. The manual addresses problems and solutions as they apply tc California and the Bay Area. It can be purchased from ABAG and is available on reference at many Iocal Iibrarie� and in city and county public works and planning depart- ments. USDA Soil Conservation Service personnel are willing to provide more information on specific erosion problems. This brochure is a cooperative proJect of the Association of Bay Area Governments and the East Bay Regional Park District. �y Assoc�F�r�oN 7 1► ov enr aeA �� GOVERNMENTS Hotel Ciaremont Berke�ey, California 94705 (415) 841-9730 PROrEC�ING EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 11500 Skyline Bivd. Oakland, CA 94619 531-9300 Y�UR ..�. . FROM EROSION EROSION CON?ROL CAN PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY AND PREVEN? FUTURE HEADACHES � Vegetation-stabifized Bare Slope: Headaches ��J 1�, Slope: Security aad Liability f � (/ ( ( ; �l • soil in place • mudslide danger • minimum of • loss of topsoil �� erosion • clogged storm `.�: �� / • fewer winter clean- drains, flooding -:�.�. �` � �/ b up problems problems '=i � • protection ior • expensive � � ` �, /� house foun- cleanup ��'��`� � .� dations • eroded or ' buried house '�`'� /�� foundations �1 (� �,, �,�.l+ '� . � � v�� ,`.,�-:,�i• 1' ""� `;Y� . ��/��I `} `,--i�'r ,' 4. `• `.. /`, �/ t � `ri ;�: :, i'� :'2 j;: // �-i;.' • . � .,.y, ' , . o ,..-• .,..�._.-.-_--.-��-: . � . . ... ?IPS FOR THE HOMBOWNE� %`�� "Wiaterize" your property by mid-September. Don't wait until spring ta put in Iandscap'rng. You need winter protettion. Fina1 Iandscaping can be done Iater. Inexpensive measures installed by fall will give you protection quickly that will Iast a11 during the wet season. Ia �� a�ternooss y�� caa: • Dig trenches to drain surface runoff water away from problem areas such as steep, bare slopes. • Prepare bare areas on slopes for seeding by raking the surface to Ioosen and roughen sail so it will hold seeds. /` ' ,`•.�� / +` 'ier7... �' _ �tis Seediag of bare slopes • Hand broadcast or use a"breast seeder." A t�pical yard can be done in Iess than an hour. • Give seeds a boost with fertilizer. • Mu1ch if you can, with grass clippings and Ieaves, bark chips or straw. • Use netting to hold soil and seeds on steep slopes. • Check with your Iocal nursery for advice. r �V V�� Wint¢r alert � Check before starms to see that drains and ditches are not clogged by Ieaves and rubble. • Check after major storms to be sure drains are clear and vegetation is holding on slopes. Repair as necessary. • Spot seed any bare areas. '� �� ' • ' � • • ��;i�i.9,- • • • � �,�,i;,.�,.r ' � ' • � ��' • • • • ��:t... �'�4!'�. Soil erosion costs Bay Area homeowners millions of do1- Iars a year. We Iose valuable topsoil. We have to pay for damage to roads and property. And our tax money has to be spent on cleaning out sediment from storm drains, channels, Iakes and the Bay. You can protect your prop- erty and prevent future headaches by following these guidelines: BEF4RE AND - DURIN� CONSTRUCTION • Plan construction activities during spring and summer, so that erosion control measures can be in place when the rain comes. • Examine your site carefully before building. Be aware of the slope, drainage patterns and soil types. Proper site design wi1l help you avoid expensive stabilization work. Preserve existing vegeta- tion as much as possible. Limit grading and plant removal to the areas under current construc- tion. (Vegetation wi11 naturally curb erosion, improve the appearance and the value of your property, and reduce the cost of landscaping Iater. ) • Use fencing to protect plants from frll material and traffrc. If you have to pave near trees, do so with permeable as- phalt or porous paving blocks. • Preserve the natural contours of the Iand and disturb the earth as Iittle as possible. Limit the time in which graded areas are exposed. • Minimize the length and S�eE�'iiiESS O{ SiOYeS vy � benching, terracing, or _ constructing diversion -;` �;� structures. Lan�SCdY2 ' benched areas to stabilize . the slope and improve its appearance. • As soon as possible after grading a site, plant vegetation on a11 areas that are not to be paved or otherwise covered. • Control dust on graded areas by sprinkling with water, restricting traffic to certain routes, and paving or gravel- ing access roads and driveways. T'EMPORARY MEASURES r0 S?ABILIZE THE SOIL Grass provides the cheapest and most ef- fective short-term ero- sion control. It grows quickly and covers the ground completely. To fnd the best seed mix- tures and plants for your area, check with your Iocal nursery, the U.S. Department of Ag- riculture Soi1 Conserva- tion Service, or the University of California Cooperative Extension. Mulches hold soil moisture and provide ground protection from rain damage. They also provide a favorable envi- ronment for starting and growing plants. Easy-to-obtain mulches are grass clippings, Ieaves, sawdust, bark chips and straw Straw mulch is nearly 100% effective when held in place by spraying with an organic glue or wood fber (tackifiers), by punching it into the soil with a shovel or roller, or by tack- ing a netting over it. Commercial applications of wood fbers combined with various seeds and fertilizers (hydraulic mulching) are effec- � ..-: tive in stabilizing sloped areas. : . : -. : '` . .`. : . ... :. _: . Hydraulic mulching with a `'' tacki:��r shculd . , . . ; :.: , .::. . be done in two °= - . _:..-.. : , , � . : .,,.. separate appli- ' � ' caticrs: t1:e first � � � composed of seed fertilizer and half the mulch, the second compased of the remaining mulefi and tackifier. Commer- cial hydraulic mulch applicators—who also provide other erosian control services — are listed under "Iandscaping" in the phone book. ____.-- ------ 1 y: �;F�- .*, _ _ - � , , �_�.�«'"� Mats of excelsior, Jute netting and plastic sheets can be ef- fective temporary covers, but they must be in contact with the soil and fastened securely to work effectively. Roof dxaiaage can be collected in barrels or storage con- tainers or routed into lawns, planter boxes and gardens. Be sure to cover stored water so you don't collect mos- quitos, too. Excessive runoff should be directed away from your house. Too much water can damage trees and make foundations unstable. STRUCTURAL RUNOFF CONTROLS Even with proper timing and planting, you may need to protect disturbed areas from rainfall until the plants have time to establish themselves. Or you may need permanent ways to transport water across your property so that it doesn't cause erosion. To keep water from carrying soil from your site and dump- ing it into nearby Iots, streets, streams and channels, you need ways to reduce its volume and speed. Some exam- ples of what you might use are: perimeter dike jute netting a \ iii'ilrlii��ri.�\ �nlr.r:,,. i, !•,, diversion di� bench / straw nulch • Riprap (rock Iining) — to protect channel banks from erosive water flow • Sediment trap—to stop runoff carrying sediment and trap the sediment �:: ::.: - . --� r`'` /. P • Storm draia outle protection—to reduc� the speed of water fIow ing from a pipe onto open ground or into a natural channel • Diversioa dike or perimeter dike — to divert excess water to places where it can be disposed of properly �,�'��^-...�. _ � .. w �-' � r,-^-..�.�'�v�-�--�' � _—��v.'�,. � ;°.? ` " .!S'� �•�/� � � �1`K i`i �.. .. .....�.~.g -J �,�,,,.�..�„ �/ .�.'. . ,,.,,w.... �' _ -__ � �-< / , - �` . .'�� /- , .------ _:�.=:.�.� • Straw bale dik¢—to stop and detain sediment from sma1l unprotected areas (a short-term measure) • Perimeter swale — to divert - - runoff from a disturbed area �; or to contain runoff within a disturbed area . • - • Grade stabilization structure — to carry concentrated runoff down a slope sediment trap a __ o �' � � � �::. . outlet protectio� �' Conservatree RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Design Review Amendment for proposed changes to a previously approved new, two-story sinqle family dwelling with an attached garaae at 1452 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, Ginkqo Burlingame LLC, property owner, APN: 026-042-140; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 14, 2009, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption, is exempt from environmental review. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12`h dav of September, 2009 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 1452 Drake Avenue Effective September 24, 2009 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 31, 2009, sheets A1.1, A2.3, A3.1 through A3.3 and detail sheets for the clay tile roofing; 2. that the shower stall in the basement shall only be allowed in conjunction with a sauna in the basement and shall be built to the size, configuration and location as shown on the Basement Plan, sheet A2.0; that any changes to the size, configuration or location of the shower stall shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission review; that if the sauna is not built as part of the project a shower stall shall not be allowed in the basement. The waste line from the shower shall not exceed 2" in diameter, or the minimum required for a shower, whichever is less; 3. C! that if the sauna is ever removed or eliminated in the future, the shower stall shall also be removed or eliminated along with the sauna; that the landscaping on the right side of the structure shall be revised to include more pervious materials and less hardscape; 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size garage, which would include amendment to this permit; or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an 7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 9, 2009 and September 26, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's October 16, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's February 9, 2009 and September 29, 2008 memos, and NPDES Coordinator's September 29, 2008 memos shall be met; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with ail the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 1452 Drake Avenue Effective September 24, 2009 Page 2 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possib�e, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 14. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �,� . ., ,.�•. �, BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � �� .� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ��.� _,� � � �+ � y ` ' � . ry PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 6 ° .: � �� ,:� www.burlingame.org •�- `am�9 �-�` � �,� � � �`�� '� �� ,-� ,�'`� � —F e``�'�`'� �-°��—=� Site: 1452 DRAKE AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following pu6lic hearing on MONDAY, September 14, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hnll Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Amendment to Design Review for changes to n previously approved new, two story single family dwelling and attached garage at 1452 DRAKE AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 026-Q42-140 Mailed: September 4, 2009 (Please refer to ofher side) �,'0ui-;'��G�3-�� `�-� .�� =� =i;-:ie� =r�rf �� ='� ;"v �u ��T`. �,�� P�J�LIC �iEAiZINC ��'�E O . Cdtv �f �urllnaarne A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject applicatian(s) in cou�t, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please cail' (650) 558-7250. Than4c you. William Meeker Community Development Director - �U�LIC 9iE�RBNG 1��'TI�E (Please refer to ofher side) � -.. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes September 14, 2009 6. 1452 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND GINKGO BURLINGAME LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) (77 NOTICED) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated September 14, 2009, with attachments. Senior P�anner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Seventeen (17) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Randy Grange, 205 Park Road; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Like the changes to the design. ■ Concerned about what happens at the ridgeline with the new roofing material. (Grange — will look much like it is drawn.) ■ Why changing to stucco? (Grange — primarily for maintenance; plus the client doesn't want wood. The plaster will tone down the design.) ■ Was additional structural work necessary for the new roofing material? (Grange — yes.) Public comments: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke: Much better project than originally approved; will this be the last amendment? This should be the last amendment. (Grange — is following all of the rules; if the owner wants to propose an amendment, will be considered by the Commission.) There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Yie moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 31, 2009, sheets A1.1, A2.3, A3.1 through A3.3 and detail sheets for the clay tile roofing; 2. that the shower stall in the basement shall only be allowed in conjunction with a sauna in the basement and shall be built to the size, configuration and location as shown on the Basement Plan, sheet A2.0; that any changes to the size, configuration or location of the shower stall shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission review; that if the sauna is not built as part of the project a shower stall shall not be allowed in the basement. The waste line from the shower shall not exceed 2" in diameter, or the minimum required for a shower, whichever is less; 3. that if the sauna is ever removed or eliminated in the future, the shower stall shall also be removed or eliminated along with the sauna; 4. that the landscaping on the right side of the structure shall be revised to include more pervious materials and less hardscape; 14 CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes September 14, 2009 5. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 7. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 9, 2009 and September 26, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's October 16, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's February 9, 2009 and September 29, 2008 memos, and NPDES Coordinator's September 29, 2008 memos shall be met; 8. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 14. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification 15 C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes Sepfember 14, 2009 documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 16. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 17. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Terrones called fora voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1. (Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:54 p.m. 16