The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1336 Drake Avenue - Staff Report, , Item No. 8c Regular Action Item � : �, ` �,.� ��' � , �� i°' y�� t•- �Y . . � "�'�! .�&o. . . . � . .. . �� 3 .1 � t �""y� , .. �, �r. ��vIt$1w ��: 'R��' � � �";. � .� `�a �� . . . .•�` �,e�`r. � �',��.:,�.._,�t � "�''��'` m' �°�' � � �� , � �� .i q�R1�. �,n�,, {�..t " : ; �=�< � t"� � : ,� ,� 4` +�_ , �. ° 9k`� p a � � '�� ,�;,s /'1�` ✓"` ✓ t � +� a � s � e �y : � � i ,� .�,��' �'� �. �,�.?i� .. >`�. � . 'e#�.. � �� y�� X:. 'r. �r �^a�;�p `, '�' . . � *� �„.,,+�, � x��i�� ri3} . ny �' 'i �ty ,. � � � + `� !,' § # . �-''. ; � _ .� , will� �•w�... w,� ,.¢t �Y� � ,. � . � : ��. R, ��,r . ,'� .; � , ;�" �- � � � i� -� , .� �r � q �e A,��+"A ; i °'r fi x� y ,�� 33�� .. � � .t ` � ? � ., t a y" t �: ,� � : � � �£ �"' � . ,� ,, .;,� � ; ,� � r�, � ��«� ►�4� �,� �� , �� a'�"�� °� �� j� „�. „�: � � j� � �4 .. ._—. . �_ "M�� fr1i �� 4 +��p,� M ��''�n'. � , s �' �`' � �`��, � �� w��.� � _ �-� aW .;�,� , ,��, ��,�;'�f ,t�;�" ,,,.,�c°� �` ` �� -� �J ��'� �s.�J� � � , � '�`� :. . . � L . � t e _ �� , ; � � '� 3� � ,� �" � ' " _ , 4. , - -.,. ,, , � r � >. ". 1 3� y � �Y, , . T � � e l � ,�[. �� tl4�r �] ^�� ., —t'�. � � 4 �F F� �t e ��Y' 4 ,' + ._ . . . a t,y� ,��(_ � , � , r �, i � � t � � ,,j� , c'u � c� a�yV � :- � . � � $'��ryS. ' � � � / 4 a ,� 1` i�,.` �' �� '. .� rµ .. �} �'h� �i � � � � �_��` , -z . . t<'�1�� . �+, . "^k � . � a�,��;�, ,I� '\rly� , _ � �'�,* � � '�r3: �' 'i�� PROJECT LOCATION 1336 Drake Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Item No. 8c Regular ,Action Item Address: 1336 Drake Avenue Meeting Date: Aprii 27, 2020 Request: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detac;hed garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form+One Design Property Owner: 1336 Drake Ave LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-062-180 Lot ��rea: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, wh�ich states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbani:zed areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residE�nces as part of a project. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing one-story single famiily dwelling and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage. The proposed house will have a total floor area of 3,416 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,416 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including an 85 SF covered front porch exemption). The new single family dwelling will contain four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on-site. One covered parking space is provided in the detached garage (17'-3" x 21'-2" clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. The applicant submitted an arborist report, which was prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, d��ted August 14, 2019 (attached). The report includes an evaluation �f ten existing trees on the site and two street trees. Two of the trees on the property are protected size, including a 16.3-inch diameter Redwood and an 18.0-inch diameter Bay. The applicant is proposing to remove all existing trees on the subject property. The applicant has applied for a Protected Tree Removal Permit with the City Arborist (see attached). The two existing street trees are also proposed for removal and replacement. The City Arborist is requiring that they be replaced with two new 24-inch box Red Maple trees. The proposed Landscape Plan shows a total of nine trees to be planted throughout the site including 3, 24-inch box size and 6, 15-gallon landscape trees and therefore complies with Chapter 11.06, Urban RE:forestation and Tree Protection requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (C.S. 2!�.57.010 (a)(1)). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review 133Ei Drake Avenue 1336 Drake Avenue Lot Area: 6,000 SF Plans date stam ed: March 4, 2020 and A ril 16, 2020 PROPOSED ALLOWED/RE:QUIRED Front Setback (1st flr): 23'-8" 22'-2" (block average) (2nd flr): 22'-2° 22'-2,: _........__ .................................. ... ...............�.............................. ............._.............. .....__.................................._.__. __............................... . .. ... . _. . . .... .. . . _..._ ........................ _.... . ....... .... ............................................._..........._.........................._...._....................................._......._..........._....................._....... Side Setback (left): 6'-10" 4'-0" (righf): 13'-2" � 4'-0" ........................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................�................ .. ...................................................... . .. . ..... .. .... .. Rear Setback (1st flr): 41'-9'/2" 15'-0"' (2nd flr): 42'-4" 20'-0'" Lot Coverage: 2,031 SF 2,400 :;F 33.8% 40% ............................................................ ................................................................................................................................................................................................_. ;...... ......... ............ . ... .. ... ... . .... . . .. . . ... . .. ... . .. ..... .... ... .... ..... .......... .............................................................................. FAR: 3,416 SF ' 3,416 �>F 0.57 FAR 0.57 F��R _ .........................._......_.._............_........................................._.................................._........__.........._...................... _.................._...... _ ..... ..... .. .. . .. . . .. ...._.............................................._..........................................._........._ .._..............._........_..................................._.... # of bedrooms: 4 --- ........................................................................ ......................�................._................._................................................._.........................................................................................�.................._....................................�......................................_........_................_......................................... Off-Street Parking: 1 covered � 1 covered (17'-3" x 21'-2" clear interior) ; (10' x 20' cleair interior) 1 uncovered 1 uncove�red (9' x 20') (9' x 2C)') Building Height: 29'-9" 30'-0" _ ....................................._...... ............................................................................................................................._...........................................................................�............_....................................................._.................................................................................................... DH Envelope: Complies CS 25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 6,000) + 1,100 SF + 396 SF = 3,416 SF (0.57 FAR) Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: aluminum clad wood windows, simulated divided lite. • Doors: wood and simulated divided lite on house; wood garage door. • Siding: cedar shingle siding. • Roof.• asphalt shingles. • Other: stone veneer chimney, wood columns. Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on October 28, 2019, the Commission had the following comments and suggestions regarding this project ancl voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached October 28, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes). • Provide articulation on front fa�ade. • Coordinate with neighbors on both sides of property regarding landscaping and fencing. • Revisit setbacks on site plan to be more easily read. • Break up massing on second floor. • Revisit front door and add additional features. The applicant submitted a response letter, dated February 20, 2020, and revised plans, date st�imped March 4, 2020 and April 16, 2020, to address the Planning Commission's comments. Please refer to the attached October 28, 2019 Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for a detailed Ilist of Planning 2 Design Review 133E� Drake Avenue Commission comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the new house (featuring a variety of materials including composition shingle roofing, cedar shingle siding, stone veneer chimney, wood doors, and aluminum clad wood casement windows with simulated true dividec� lite and wood trim) is compatible with the character of the neighborhood; that the proposed project includes a de�tached garage at the rear of the property, which is consistent with the garage patterns within the neighborhood; that the articulation provides visual interest on all elevations and the architectural elements of the pro��osed structure compliments the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the propose�� structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent propertie:�; and that the proposed landscaping, include new shrubs and trees to be planted throughout the site, are proportionate to the mass and bulk of the structure. For these reasons, the project may be found to be comp�atible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution ��f the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 4, 2020, sheets T1.0 through L1.1 and revised sheets T1.0, A2.0, A3.1, and FAR; stamped April 16, 2020; 2. that tree protection measures shall be installed on-site prior to demolition or construction commencing per the Kielty Arborist Services August 14, 2019 report for all trees remaining on-site; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Divisic�n or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project �>hall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is. required; the Design Review 133ti Drake Avenue conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that ail air ducts, plumbing vents, and fiies shall be combined, where possible, to a sin�gle termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior o�r exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving c�n the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to� comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certificatioi� by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design prc�fessional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a ficensed surveyor shalf locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based ��n the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by thE� City Engineer; 13. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certific;ation that the architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design v�✓hich should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the a�pproved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shalt be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been build according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Michelle Markiewicz Associate Planner c. 1336 Drake Ave LLC, property owner Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, applicant and designer 4 Design Review Attachments: October 28, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated February 20, 2020 Application to the Planning Commission Tree Removal Permit Application, issued September 19, 2019 Arborist Report, prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, dated August 14, 2019 Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed April 17, 2020 Area Map 1335 Drake Avenue N �, c � �- �� :�i' iii'� 0 � �ireo � Monday, October 28, 2019 c. 1336 Drake Avenue, single family dwelling designer; 1336 Drake Markiewicz City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM BURLINGAM:= CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLWGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two-story and detached garage. (Tim Raduenz, Form + One, ap��licant and Ave LLC , property owner) (118 noticed) Staff Contac:t: Michelle Attachments: 1336 Urake Ave - Staff Report 1336 Drake Ave - Attachments 1336 Dr�ke Av� - �I�ns All Commissioners had visited fhe project site. There were no ex-parte communrcations to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff Chair Comaroto opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz, represenfed the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Would like to see something a little more substantial regarding the front door. (Raduer�z: Currently proposing a door and /arge sidelrte, wiN make the panes more symmetrical.) > On sheet A3.0, the numbers on the right and front elevations aren't adding up on the left-hand side. 9 feet from the top of the plate to the grade is shown on one elevation and 8'-6" plus 1'-6" is :shown on the other elevation; please review and correct. > You designed a similar house on the 1000 block of Drake Avenue. Would you say this design similar to that? (Raduenz: It's a very similar design, however we are bumping out the second floor and the colors wrll definitely be drfferent. We did change a few things on the inside. 1 try to get a side entry, which is something different that what you typically see, but it works really well for a family. On the front elevation, we have the four brackets thaf support the articulation of the second floor bedroom.) > When we reviewed that project, I really liked it in plan, thought it was a cool looking hou:�e. However when it was burlt, I was concerned with the massing and thought it was ouf of proportion to the houses around it. So i'm just wondering if there's anyway to break up that second floor massrng more. (Raduenz: 1 can look into it.) > Would benefit to have a rendering for the proposed house. (Raduenz: Will provide a renciering. Think we can provide more articulation by pushing back the dormer on the right side and maybe incorporatrng a popped out dormer above the entry, that would change the look drastically.) > Have you talked to the neighbors about the project? Since you're showing new fencinc� around the whole lot, please coordinate with them. (Raduenz: We will coordinate with the neighbors.) > Havrng trouble reading the setbacks on the site plan, can you revisit the site plan so we can read the setbacks more clearly? (Raduenz: Yes, will do.) Public Comments: Cify of Burlingame page � Printed on 12/5/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Oc:tober 28, 2019 > Ray Kruck, 1338 Drake Avenue: Neighbor on the right, thrnk the project is okay, but haven't seen too much of the elements of proposed project. One concerns 1 have is that there are a lof of the frees that are dead along our fence line, so glad to hear theyre being removed. Would like to review the new landscape plans fo see where the nine new trees will be planted and to what extent that would provide privacy or shielding. A/so concerned with the massing of the roofline along the right side of the house; would like to see where the windows line up with my son's window. Otherwise, don't have serious objections, but am glad to hear the property will get refreshed (andscaping and new fencing. Chair Comaroto closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion/Direction: > Think iYs a nice project, but not sure what affect revisiting the plate heights wrN have on some of the proportions, it may or may not help. > Think it would help if there were more articulation on the front facade, whether iYs bringinc7 the left side forward or the right side back a little bit more, and maybe adding that additional pop-out o�n that second floor. > Should coordinate with the neighbors on both sides of the property, share with them the proposed landscaping and fencing along those shared property lines. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to pl;�ce the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Sargent, Comaroto, Terrones, Tse, Gaul, and Loftis Absent: 1 - Kelty City of Burlingame page y Prrnfed on 12/5/2019 Form + One 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, UT 84098 p+ 415.819.0304 E + tim@formonedesign.com TRANSMITfAL FORM To: City of Burlingame From: Tim Raduenz Subject: 1336 Drake — Changes to exterior style Date Sent: 02/20/20 Number of Pages: 1 Plannin� Review + Corrections made: After taking your comments on the exterior style not matching or the similar design esthetic of a home f did a few years ago we have make some substantial changes to the exterior with keeping the layout in-tack as the layout itself is very effective. To that end we hope you see this as an approvable project! Best, V1A^ `�'� Tim Raduenz — ��P,P --r `\ _� ----- Build It RE:E r�� MEMBER FO�m + One • Design & Planning • 4843 Silver Springs Drive• Park City • UT • 84098 •(a�s) 819.0304 � tim@formonedesign.com ' PLANNING APPLICATION SURLINGAME CO`I�MUI�GITY DEVELOP`�EI�T DEFART�'E�IT-mPLAf��N,NG DIVISIO�I 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT(�a.BURLINGAME.ORG z O ' � Q. �: � O ; �: z U w � O � � 1336 DRAKE AVENUE PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION (N) 2 STORY RESIDENCE WITH (N) DETACHED GARAGE : .. . :. ��' �� - . _� ..� ., GREG GAMBRIOLI ��SUMMIT DRIVE, HILLSBOROUGH CA 94010 ; PROPERTY OWNER NAME APPLICANT? ADDRESS �: z 650-333-6844 RGDEVELOPMENTSINC@YAHOO.COM O PHONE E-MAIL F= � TIM RADUENZ � 4843 SILVER SPRWGS DRIVE, PARK CITY UT 84098 � � fi'�'TlDESIGNER X APPUCANT? ADDRESS � 415-819-0304 TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM z � "'' PHONE E-MAIL z ' 24809 � v ' BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE # � : ..... ......... .. .. ...... ........ . ......... . . . ....., . .. . .. . , ... ....... . ..... . ..... ... .. ........ .. .. ... . .... .... . ... . ,,, ,...... .. .,. ............ ...... �; 'FOR PROJECT REFUNDS" - Please provide an address to which to all refund checks will be mailed to: .� Y�� ,�. ��--° � ,. � , . ,��°' • ' , y�r.:r _.m�� '�' �`� `�.� � ��;,��,�� ._�`� ��. ��-t��;� � `� > NAME � ADDRESS �� y�� . �.�� Y�., . . . � o-': I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY � KNOWLEDGEANDBELIEF� �~ � � ; w� 5I2212019 z : � • �` s � � APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 'IF DIF'E -NT ROM PR PERTY OWNER DATE t � � ' �� I AM AWARE OF T�E PROPOSED APPLICATI N AN�HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPUCANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE > PLANNING COMf��' IONIDIVISIO ��H" �' Q 'd �� y�.,�� ay��°°' a � c, _ r,�. ,''v��"��yN � "�"�� L� � ':� +i. , �; Q',; PROPERTY OWN�R'S SIGNATURE DATE � . ...� .. ... ..�,., �. _.. ,. .. �,.., . ., ....:, ,... _ ,. ' AUTHORIZATION TO REPRODUCE PLANS ' i HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST ANDIOR POST PLANS SUE�MITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS,P THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING , OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION 4 ` (INITIALS OF °t� ESIGNERI , �_..: ..:�,,.: .._.. . ... , _ :.. k . ... . a ._�., ... .... ., ..,.,, .,.. . �.,. �_ . 026-062-180 R1 _._ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # (APN) ZONING � J z O w N � � � Q � � APPLICATION TYPE ❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) � DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) _ ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) ❑ WIRELESS ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: � � - + �. ,k 1 `'� � ° � ,,, z DATE RECEIVED: ' c!� —1 D � C N m O z r -G �z�hc�� .. � � � ;-� BURl1YGn(v9E �� ;.. ,� �� . Date:O$-14-19 Parks 8c Recreation Depurtment 8S0 Btrrlingame Avenue, Burlingame, CA 940I0 (650) SS8-7330 The undersigned owner of the property at: ,� - �t\ � �r <, �:; �� Address:1336 Drake Ave. hereby applies for a permit to remove or prune more than 1i3 of the canopy of the following protected tree(s): �� `�`�Gink o Tree #2/Ba #11(Redwood #12 6.0/18.0/16.3 DBH Species: g y Circumference: Location on Property See SIt2 p�afl at1Ci aYbOPISt t'epOt� Worlc to be Performed: RemovalX Trim More Than 1/3 of the Crown Reason Work is Necessary: neW COfIStCUCtlOtl Is this Tree Removal Request Part of a Building Project? YESX NO Note: A photograph of the tree(s) and a schematic drawing of the location of the tree(s) on the proper!ty must be submitted along with $?5.00 to: City o£ Burlingame. Additional documentatio�t maybe required to support removal. Attach any documentation you tnay have. (Exantple: Report from an Independent Arhorist, pictures of damaged structures, letters of concern from neighbors, etc.). Owner (Print) GfEg G8111b1'1011 phone 650-333-6844 Address 2415 Summit Dr. Hillsborough CA 94010 Emailrgdevelopmentsinc@yaho�o.com (if different than above) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�•-------------------- PERMIT — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ��S Cia� f'�� Payment Rec. � I � Payment Method ?•� ,`'' This permit allows the applicant to remove or prune the above listed tree(s) in accordance witlt the provisions of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance {Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). By signing this perrnit, the applicant acknowledges receipt of a copy of Chapter 11.06, and agrees to comply with its provisions and all eonditions listed below; and that all appeals ilave expir or been resolved. OWNER SIGNATURE � CITY A.RBORIST CONDITIONS: C" t�-�� ; - �,��g�� j�`f ;'"�m PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL PERMTT APPLICATION 24 - inCh bOx size single stem landscape tree(s) (no fruit or nut trees) will 6e required and may be planted anywhere on the property. If conditions ar�� not met within tlre allottecl time as specified in Chapter 11, 06 090. (b)(S), payment of $1200. 00 for eaclt tree into tfte tree replacement fun�l will be required. �_-�y r�� ,�.t- �:,�,,, .�, %'_ ,. G .t..G! : /�.4..�..C-[:� ,U.; 4 � ;�_...;i- ND replacement(s) required Contact the Parks Division at (650) SSS-7330 when removal(.$) are completed. BUILDING PROJECT: Permit in�fective until a_ter Planning Cor,nmission review. DATE PERMIT EFFECTIVE I: 6 �f .� c� pERMIT EXPIRES �, I '�1 , Z�°� DATE COMPLETED This work should be done by qualified lree professionals and a copy of this per►nit must be avaelab[e at the job site at all times when work is being performed. 07/2018 revised Kielty Arborist Services LLC Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-515-9783 August 14, 2019 Tim Radunez 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, Utah 84098 Site: 1336 Drake Avenue, Burlingame CA Dear Mr. Radunez, As requested on Thursday, August l, 2019, I visited the above site to inspect and comment on the trees. A new home is proposed for this site, and your concern for the future health and safety of the trees has prompted this visit. Site plan A1.0 was reviewed for writing this report. A tree protection plan will also be included at the end of this report. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the trees were not climbed for this inspection. The trees in question were located on a map provided by you. The trees were then measurecl for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). The trees were given a condition rating for form and vitality. The trees condition rating is based on 50 percent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the trees was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spre,ad was paced off. Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 Survey: Tree# Species 1 P Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) �2) DBH CON HT/SP Comments 6.0 80 20/10 Good vigor, good form, young street tree. 2P/R Ginkgo 4.0 80 (Ginkgo biloba) 3R Birch 6.7-6.8-8.1 25 (Betula pendula) 4 Italian cypress 8.0 70 (Cupressus sempervirens) 5 Italian cypress 6.0 70 (Cupressus sernpervirens) 6R Bottle brush 8-4-5-4-4 45 (Callistemon citrinus) 7R Hollywood juniper 5.6-6.9 50 (Juniperus chinensis) 8R Hollywood juniper 9.8-8.0 50 (Juniperus chinensis) 9R Hollywood juniper 10-8-7-5 50 (Juniperus chinensis) l OR Sottle brush 4.0 25 (Callistemon citrinus) I 1 P/R Bay 18.0 40 (Umbellularia californica) 15/8 Good vigor, good form, young street tree. transplantable size. 35/25 Poor vigor, poor form, multi leader at grade, drought stressed, in decline. 30/5 Good vigor, good form, against existing driveway. 30/3 Good vigor, good form, against existing driveway. 20/20 Fair vigor, poor form, multi leader at grade, in container, against existing driveway. 20/12 Fair vigor, fair form, codominant at �;rade, against existing driveway. 20/12 Fair vigor, fair form, codominant at �;rade, against existing driveway. 20/l 5 Fair vigor, fair form, multi leader at ,�rade. 15/12 Poor vigor, poor form, causing prope:rty damage, in decline. 35/20 Poor vigor, fair form, covered in ivy, abundance of dead wood, ganodermG� fungus on trunk. 12P/R Redwood 16.3 80 50/15 Good vigor, good form, 5 feet from riome. (Sequoia sempervirens) P-Indicates protected tree by city ordinance (I S inches diameter or str�eet tree of any size) R-Indicates proposed tree removal. 1336 Drake Avenue 8/l4/19 (3) . x'j `�� a ♦i_.ae� �.. _ � `+._';; r . ,.., ,. _ ,�,��.,� 'iilSW 30 ^ .' .. � ' '. ,�,� �. - � � . � ___..� .4 ..,..,.�. A GARA(1[ ss. �" .d �. � _ �': F - �'� . � � �� `t . + � i - rr... � . a � �� ' I .:,e.. . •� - .. ; �� . � � �, , I �*' �" : ,� � �'a . . . ' . l. _,4,..�I,r." : I�i , �t '1 � if+ .�y��(+ . ��• a �.'��'ilr. . w . ��. Y! , •„. � }' ' � 7 r - �, � �IFkkdr �N T�1 .� . M a� . .' } `t� 4O - 1 �, .r � � 'W w��:_ � f . � k �:.la y ,; � �'� �•• w �<. " F j UOSI�MC �El�+Ci ' wMA�N � ;`,r, � '��, * w. w � . •' � :`�� ,� �� ....�. - � � , ' 'HR Mz.C:- W 1�� ' � ' i i- z '•� � � ' i ,�---�,�-'_.._,_��.'' '. _ � , . �... � �.,a � • .. t �.�y � � •tY ik '. � . +�� Q:�f9�`� {`i �- . z�.� ____ .••. � �, � -r =��s `' , l O T 2 6 `��, g � .; ; '. .�c� �.0003 sas� ,� � _ _ w • '�o - a"� w+ • . . �r��`1 _ - ��i � �'b4�OtYC `�D.pO' ` �, � � _ wd� a� �•. . � ,.. . _ .�1 t�` `.'�: '� -w ._ � +' .. ` • . �su■ u: e y • -: �r � �_ �....__.�_._ — _.. �s � ... _..._.. .._. �Y..�._.._._. . _ . . .,__ } f1'. :��'�„ _- _ J.�li -..^�RI1.�...... ... •� + � ~ M' £� +x. 7illi Showing tree number locations 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 .'. ,.'e.. ��r" � � ... � ��f: � ��,,,,. � �' � � � a� _ � .. :� � `� � � F [i �� __ f� ��. ri� � >,� �,�,,� , ,; e M' �,,, � � `� k`-., c .,. -.. ; �. :� , � .. 6 , '�t��,„ �:� � �� ' � ;�" ,� �` �, ;.�� ;�,�e � � >�� ` � '�° � �` .��.. , ��.� _ �.. ,t, ,a� : � � �,;�� Summary: The trees on site are a mix of imported trees. No native trees to Burlingame were observed. Ginkgo street trees #1 and #2 are in good condition. These trees have recently been planted within the public right of way and are considered to be protected street trees. Showing ginkgo street trees #1 and #2 Birch tree #3 is in very poor condition. The majority of the tree is dead with little live foliage observed. The decline of the birch tree ,�� ;� is likely due to the fact that no supplemental �� irrigation has been provided to the tree. This .�, � "� y �,��'' tree is not of a protected size in the city of ��" ;`*�� k � Burlingame. ;.,� �� ,'' �� /`'' � �, �. �* . '�a . � � �f .;P'+- f �� . . �. �,��:. � ° ;t "'F '�",. , w... . � � ,;�, �� Showing birch tree #3 in very poor condition, ��, � �} �� :. _"_. � d � y�"'�� . . ; � � � "'�""�-, � � �; 4 � " � ` � � ' note the dead turf as well ; � �� j� `�` �� ,'` � - � s � �� : � � �.� ti �" � 4�' . x� ,. T � (4) ��t._:� �ya S �� ._ _s , �'� . 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 (5) Italian cypress trees #4 and #5 are in good condition. The trees are growing against the existing driveway on site. Cypress tree #4 is growing within the public right of way, and is considered to be a protected tree. Cypress tree #5 is not a protected tree. When demolishing the existing driveway, it is recommended to carefully remove the concrete and base rock within 10 feet from these trees. Only hand tools should be permitted in this area. Any exposed roots must be covered by soil as soon as possible. Exposed roots should be kept moist by wrapping the roots in burlap and wetting down the burlap multiple times a day. This will help to avoid root desiccation. tt. � �`.. � Trees #6-10 consist of bottle brush trees and Hollywood junipers. These trees are in poor to fair condition. All 5 trees are growing against the existing driveway on site, and have caused damage to the concrete driveway. None of these trees are of a protected size in the city of Burlingame. Showing trees #6-10 along existing driveway a��= � �=. Bay tree #1 1 is in poor condition. The tree is covered in ivy (sign of poor maintenance) with an abundance of dead wood observed within the tree canopy. A large ganoderma fungus fruiting body was observed on the tree trunk. This is often a sign of heart wood rot. This tree is at high risk of limb or trunk failure due to the observed fungus. Showing bay tree #11 Redwood tree #12 is in good condition. This tree is poorly located at 5 feet from the existing building on site. Future f�oundation damage is highly likely due to the tree's root crown being in contact with the foundation. There is not enough room to support future growth for the tree in its current location. 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 (6) Proposed tree removals: Protected trees�roposed for removal Ginkgo street tree #2 is proposed for removal in order to facilitate the construction of a rlew driveway entrance and driveway apron. The tree is in the proposed foot print of the new driveway. The tree is of a transplantable size and can be moved on the property if needed. Bay tree #11 is proposed for removal due to the tree's poor health and high-risk rating for future failure due to heart wood rot. Also, the tree is in the footprint of the proposed drivewayigarage. Redwood tree #12 is proposed for removal to facilitate the construction of the proposed driveway. The tree is poorly located on the lot with not enough room to support future �;rowth. Protected tree removals for trees #2, 1 l, and 12 will need to first obtain a heritage tree re;moval permit before being removed. Non �rotected trees to be removed Birch tree #3 is to be removed to facilitate the new driveway construction. Trees #6-10 are planned for removal as removing the existing concrete driveway would likely have a high impact on tree health. Replacement trees A total of 9 new trees are proposed on this site, as seen on site plan A1.0. This means that for every protected tree being removed, 3 new trees are being planted. The following tree protection plan will help to reduce poteniial impacts to the retained trees on site. Tree Protection Plan: Tree PNotection Zones Tree protection zones should be installed and maintained throughout the entire length of the project. Prior to the commencement of any Development Project, a chain link fence shall be installed at the drip line of any protected tree which will or will not be affected by the eonstruction. The drip line shall not be altered in any way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction. Fencing for the protection zones should be 6-foot-tall metal chain link type supported by 2-inch metal poles pounded into the ground by no less than 2 feet. The su��port poles should be spaced no more than 10 feet apart on eenter. Signs should be placed on fencing signifying "Tree Protection Zone - Keep Out". No materials or equipment should be stored or cleaned inside the tree protection zones. Excavation, grading, soil deposits, drainage and leveling is prohibited within the tree protection zones. No wires, signs or ropes shall be attached to the protected trees on site. Utility services and irrigation lines shall all be place outsicle of the tree protection zones when possible. On this site the entire street tree planting pits near retained street tree #1 will need to be fenced off in order to protect the street tree. This is the onl�� protected tree on site to be retained. Italian cypress trees #4 and #5 are recommended to be protected by tree protection fencing once the existing driveway has been removed. Fencing is recammended to be placed at a radius of 5 feet from the cypress trees. 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 (7) Landscape Barrier zone If for any reason a smaller tree protection zone is needed for access, a landscape buffer consisting of wood chips spread to a depth of six inches with plywood or steel plates pla.ced on top will be placed where tree protection fencing is required. The landscape buffer will rielp to reduce compaction to the unprotected root zone. Inspections The site arborist will need to verify that tree protection fencing has been installed beforf� the start of construction. The city of usual(y requires a letter stating the fencing is in place before any permits are to be granted. The site arborist must inspect the site anytime excavation vvork is to take place underneath the canopy of a protected trees dripline. It is the contractor's resp�onsibility to contact the site arborist if excavation work is to take place within this area. Kielty Arborist Services can be reached at kkarbor0476@yahoo.com or by phone at (650) 515-9783 (Kesvin). Root Cutting and Grading Any roots to be cut shall be monitored and documented. Large roots (2" in diameter or over) or large masses of roots to be cut, must be inspected by the Project Arborist. The Project A.rborist, at this time, may recommend irrigation the root zone as well as other mitigation measure�s when needed. All roots needing to be cut should be cut clean with a saw or lopper. Roots to be left exposed for a period of time should be covered with layers of burlap and kept moist to avoid root desiccation. The existing grade underneath the dripline of the trees shall be retained wh�;n possible. If to be changed the Project Arborist must review and give mitigation measures. T�enching and Excavation Trenching for irrigation, drainage, electrical or any other reason shall be done by hand when inside the dripline of a protected tree. Hand digging and the careful placement of pipes below or besides protected roots will significantly reduce root loss, thus reducing trauma to the tree. All trenches shall be backfilled with native materials and compacted to near its original level, as soon as possible. Trenches to be left open for a period of time, will require the covering of all exposed roots with burlap and be kept moist. The trenches will also need to be covered with plywood to help protect the exposed roots. Irrigation Normal irrigation should be maintained throughout the entire ]ength of the project. The iimported trees on this site will require irrigation during the warm season months. Some irrigation may be required during the winter months depending on the seasonal rainfall. During the summer months the trees on this site should receive heavy flood type irrigation 2 times a month. During the fall and winter 1 time a month should sufiice. Mulching the root zone of protected trees will help the soii retain moisture, thus reducing water consumption. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476A 1336 Drake Avenue 8/14/19 (8) Kielty Arborist Services P.O. Box b 187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-515-9783 ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and ati:empt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structurallFailure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and belaw ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, rem�dial treatments, like a medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist's services such as property boundaries, property ownership, siie lines, disputes between neighbors, landlord-tenant matters, etc. Arborists cannot take such issues into a.ccount unless complete and accurate information is given to the arborist. The person hiring the arborist accepts full responsibility for authorizing the recommended treatment or remedial measures. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controiled. To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. Arborist: Kevin R. Kielty Date: August 14, 2019 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN RE:VIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been rriade for Desiqn Review for a new, two-story sinqle familv dwellinq and detached qaraqe at 1336 Drake Avenue, Zoned R-1, 1336 Drake Ave Llc, propertv owner, APN: 026-062-180; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 27, 2020, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Pianning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, :and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a lirriited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exception, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibiit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes. and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of E:urlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular rneeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April. 2020 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1336 Drake Avenue Effective May 7, 2020 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 4, 2020, sheets T1.0 through L1.1 and revised sheets T1.0, A2.0, A3.1, and FAR stamped April 16, 2020; 2. that tree protection measures shall be installed on-site prior to demolition or construction commencing per the Kielty Arborist Services August 14, 2019 report for all tree:> remaining on- site; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectur��l features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this perrriit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Managemeint District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the pro.ject construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a pai�t of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shal► not be modified or changed withoui: the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flies shall be combined, where possiible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before s� Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Rec�,rcling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work sh�all be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingarne; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review. 1336 Drake Avenue Effective May 7, 2020 Page 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential desi��n professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor ��rea ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall loc<�te the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this �survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential desiy�ner, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certiification that the architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved desi��n which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown c�n the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be sche�duled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot t:he height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note cornpliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME gURL� City Hall — 501 Primrose Road Planning Division Burlingame, California 94010-3997 PH: (650) 558-72Ei0 FAX: (650) 696-3790 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Mondav, April 27, 2020 at 7:00 P.M. Project Location: 1336 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1 (APN: 026-062-180) Description: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family� dwelling and detached garage. To adhere to the San Mateo County Health Officer's Shelter-in-Place Order, the Planning Commission meeting will be held via teleconference (see below for details). However, if you do not have access to a computer, you may attend the meeting in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. To access the meeting by computer: Go to www.zoom.us/ioin Meeting ID: 984 870 639 Password: 380568 To access the meeting b�y phone: Dial 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 984 870 639 Pass�,vord: 380568 Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccommentCcD.burlinqame.orq. Comments may be submitted both prior to the meeting, or during the meeting, and will be read aloud by staff for the record. Questions/Comments If you have any questions about the proposed project or would like to schedule an appointment to view a hard copy of the application and plans, please contact Michelle Markiewicz, staff F�lanner for the project, at mmarkiewicz(a�burlinqame.orq or (650) 558-7255. Written comments on trie project may also be emailed to the staff planner prior to the public hearing. We encourage you to review the proposed plans for this project online now at www.burlinqame.orq/planninqcommission/,�qenda. Agenda and Staff Reports The City of Burlingame will publish the meeting agenda at 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 23, 2020. The agenda will be available online at www.burlinqame.orq/planninqcommission/aaenda and will contain the staff report, related documents, and proposed plans for this application. The agenda will also be posted at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. A hardcopy of the staff report and related documents may be obtained upon request to the staff p�anner (see contact information ��bove). (p/ease refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Accessibility In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals who require special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed at the meeting, should contact the Planning Division at planninqdept(c�burlinqame.orq or (650) 558-7250, by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, April 27, 2020. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting, the materials related to it, and your ability to comment. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about the notice. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director Mailed: April 17, 2020 1336 Drake Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 026.062.180 �� w � "' � � ti �� c�Q � �J� � �L �� Q�� ' t�." � � �`;�`� �� 4 �C� ��t�i a� �� '�� v �� q �r. � �� t%�� U �� S�1 t�`�^� a`�� a �,. ��'� q �, �' [� t. i7.,,� � �� ` � a � � a � �. � �� a� �`� a a�� '� ,�� a � ��' g y � �� ,�� ' �c�3 p G-� � t^' 1� � � J � t�� r� � q � �=� �. � � �� .. �7 ��, C� il� q� ��J � �� _ ,� yy r`' � . , �. � � ti ;�R `�� q�l �-C'� � ' rv,� � � � � `� ��, � �� $ " 5 - ' � f� .. � 4� � �� '� Q� �j� `� {,xr •�ls � .` � i j' � � �� y,t. t� 'J �C`� {�� ' �, � '� �3 � t�`'"� �'� � �� t: . ` � � �� t��u w� r�� ,�� ,��; ��j F1��3 � � � �>'` �' � �� ,�� :�� Cr� L`v � � C;a�' ,,•� ��' �� fT �� Cti r7 �� "'� �� '� � �V �� ` � . �, sa r.� �, � � � , ��,� �:, � �, • � " -� , , " �� '� �� ,? �� ? �a � � .-� � �� ' � � �' �fi �� s Q:�, � �f� �i �,' r.+ " �a �i7 � �� w,_= � �� 4� �� '� �� . � tv~' .�` �„�+� �� il .. �� } � � � �� r ,� ;' � � � � C� C��, Cti�r '�a `��' . p�� `� � `` � i�.� " r .�l� /"�� ' � �� ''�� ' ��.,,�t+ t� �t _i � � �*� '�' �� h� aR � r�,�s �� Q � ��• � f,� �,�, . � �� d �' �� ` �1'� �' Q a9 R � �� . � . ; �::,; �z t�� , � � f -{,, r ,�� (+�� 4ti�3 (J'`� .��,, t,� � � & ��"j ,�,'. � .r � � � (:�� `� Q �c7Q � �� p" `� r r I�r} (��ct� � � � ,� �s . � ; � � •�., � � �. �` � � , �a a�' �� i a �t-. `� �� '�'p `� � �� ,� t� �p � �,a � �� t � ��7� f�- � `�� a �� . 3 � �'� . � `� , �a c� �� , � . �� q� GCa T�= � cti Q D�� } �'� �� J U � � �� k,� g • �y�i C� � �'�� [�� jC:7 �� ,�� Q� U� �l"1� �j� �� 1�i 9� c� �� p� �j`� � r��' {�, n� �7� �t�' [��"v �� a � q�� a� �p�' � � �� aC•?� � � x, �, �', G� ,tiT• „ ' �r; sl _ fr.� !nL