The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1012 Drake Avenue - Staff Report_001PROJECT LOCATION 1012 Drake Avenue ��;::;, �. , --~--_�_ �.,- ..� - •.- �.:.... �_� � �-- _ , Item No. �� Consent Calendar � .� _ �� ..- ..� ; __ - -''� ! ,;_ _ : i� _..._ - -.. ��"` �� .�.�.- _ � s.�•..� � ...._„_ -- _--�.�� ...-.--- -__ . City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1012 Drake Avenue Item No. 2c Consent Calendar Meeting Date: August 26, 2013 Request: Design Review for a new, two story single family dwelling with an existing detached two-car garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form One Design Property Owner: Mr. and Mrs. Fred Bertetta III General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 026-184-110 Lot Area: 6,250 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish most of an existing two-story house with an oversized, detached two-car garage (all but a portion of the existing right side wall would be demolished), and to build a new, two-story single family dwelling. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,500 SF (0.56 FAR) where 3,500 SF (0.56 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemptions). The proposed project is designed to the maximum allowable FAR. The existing over-sized, detached two-car garage will be reduced in size, but will still provide two covered, code compliant parking spaces for the proposed six-bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: • Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with an existing detached two-car garage (C.S. 25.57.010 a, 1). 1012 Drake Avenue Lot Area: 6,250 SF Plans date stam ed: Jul 22 and Au 14, 2013 '' EXISTING ; PROPOSED ' ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ' ' : _ _ __ _ _ Front (1st flr): ' 21'-5" ' 22'-6" ' 21'-0" (block average) (2nd flr): ; 53'-4" ' 21'-0° ' 21'-0" (block average) ___ _ _ _ . _ Side (left): , 11'-9" 6'-7" (to bay) ' 4'-0" (right): '', 11'-11" ; 11'-11" 4'_0" _ _ _ _ _ Rear (1st flr): ', 29'-0" ' 48'-1" 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; 29'-0" 47'-1" (to balcony) ; 20'-0" _..__ _ ; __ _ _. _ _ _............ Lot Coverage: 2,470 SF 2,207 SF 2,500 SF ' 39.5% 35% 40% __ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ . __ _. FAR: ' 2,786 SF ', 3,500 SF ; 3,500 SF _ ' 0.45 FAR ' 0.56 FAR ' 0.56 FAR _ __ _ # of bedrooms: ' 3 6 ' --- _ _ __ _ _ _ . ......... Parking: ; 2 covered ; 2 covered ' 2 covered (20' x 20') ' (20' x 20') . (20' x 20') ' 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered ' (9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') __ Height: n/a 29'-9" , 30'-0" _. _.. __........___ DH Enve/ope.• --- complies __ _ CS 25.28.075 ' (0.32 x 6,250 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,500 SF (0.56 FAR) Design Review 1012 Drake Avenue Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting on August 12, 2013, the Commission had several comments regarding the proposed project and voted to place the item on the Consent Calendar when the plans had been revised as directed (August 12, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a written response and revised plans dated August 14, 2013, to address the Planning Commission's comments. The response letter from the applicant identifies all changes made to the plans and provides an explanation for why some suggested changes were not made. Please refer to the copy of the August 12, 2013 Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Design Review Findings: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their August 12, 2013 Design Review Study meeting, that the proposed gambrel roof design for the house reduces the appearance of mass and bulk and that the shingle style house is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 22, 2013, sheet T1, GN, GP, SP, AB2.0, A2.0- A5.0 and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped August 12, 2013, sheets G1.0, A1.0, L1.0 and L1.2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 14, 2013 and July 24, 2012 memos, the Parks Division's June 14, 2013 memo, the Engineering Division's June 25, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 15, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 18, 2012 memo shall be met; -2- Design Review 1012 Drake Avenue 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to schedu�ing the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge -3- Design Review and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 1012 Drake Avenue 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Tim Raduenz, applicant and designer Attachments: ApplicanYs Response to Commission's Comments, Form One Design, dated August 14, 2013 August 12, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Photographs of streetscape, date stamped June 12, 2013 Letters of support from neighbors (3) Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 16, 2013 Aerial Photo -4- ■ �'�'�� ]f�I� + 01�1� 3841 24'h Street, #A San Francisco, Calif. 94114 P + a�e).819.0304 EMAIL + tim(a�formonedesipn.com WEB + www.formonedesipn.com TRANSM➢"I�TAL FO�Ni 12098 Hwy. 42 Ellison Bay, Wisco. 54210 To: Planning Department Subject: 1012 Drake Ave. Fax: Response to Planninq Committee Comments: From: Tim Raduenz Date Sent: 08_14 13 Number of Pages 1 Comments from e-mail dated 08-13-13 from Erika Lewit: 1. The plans in coordination with the landscape plans will be corrected on the building set, the landscape architect took for granted that the (existing) garage was staying as is. Mr. Callan will correct this on his plans that we submit to building. 2. The (N) window in the garage will be changed to a door, as commented by Planning committee. 3. We will not be adding a door to the mud room, as the driveway is already tight, and there will need to be a protruding landing that will affect the driveway, but it is a good thought! 4. The corbels on the side elevation will be called out on permit drawings. Note these brackets are called out on the front elevations already. 5. All site plans will have corrected measurements for building submittal, as I will correct my hand written marks on the planning sets. Thanks for your time and helping with making this as fast as possible, and look forward to submitting plans to building soon! Thanks PS: If you have any questions please call. Tim Raduenz — cGBP � Build It GREENY MEMBER FC�RM + C�NE • Design 8 Planning • 3841 24`" Street, #A • San Francisco • CA • 94114 • ais) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED M/NUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California August 12, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. 7. 1012 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO STORY DWELLING WITH DETACHED GARAGE (TIM RADUENZ, FORM ONE DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MR. AND MRS. FRED BERTETTA III, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERIKA LEWIT No ex parte communications were reported and all Commissioners had visited the property. Reference staff report dated August 12, 2013, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description, and noted that two additional letters in support of the project were received after the staff report was distributed. There were no questions of staff. Chair Sargent opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz represented the applicant: ■ All bedrooms are on the second floor, opened back yard to living space. ■ Reduced the size of the existing detached garage to be within the FAR limit. ■ Have done neighbor outreach before coming to the meeting — three letters from neighbors. ■ House set back 8 feet to keep existing trees, which was the preference for both the owners and the neighbors. Keeps the privacy for both of them. ■ Gambrel roof with diamond pattern shingles. Have used the shingles on previous projects and they are a great architectural feature that does not cost much more than standard asphalt shingles. Commission questions and comments: ■ Why maintain the one wall? (Raduenz: It was remodeled in the early 1990s so trying to save a little bit of cost. Also it is a good setback for the driveway — the driveway is a little narrow.) ■ On the front elevation how does the piece of horizontal trim above the pair of windows on the second floor work? Is it a piece of roof? (Raduenz: Returning the edge of the roof, so shingles will be shaped in a quarter round detail. It is an arched detail that will go over the trim.) � The garage on the Landscape Plan shows a door and a window in the front, but on the elevation it just shows a door. (Raduenz: Can have that changed. Was going off the existing survey. The garage was bigger on the site plan and it is bigger in reality, which is why we are cutting it down and taking out the door.) Will it be a double door? (Raduenz: There will be a single double-hung door because we cannot get within 10 feet of the lot line.) ■ The window on the left side elevation of the garage is almost as big as a door. Looks odd (Raduenz: It can be shrunken.) Why is it not a door, for convenience? (Raduenz: Could do that.) ■ Second floor bathroom #2 there is a window protruding into the shower. (Raduenz: IYsjust a round 18-inch window, not large. On the exterior it helps the elevation, even though it is the side.) ■ It's a perfect style for that area. There is a great shingle house around the corner. ■ Is the tile work from previous owner still on the inside? (Raduenz: Yes.) ■ Gambrel roof brings down the massing nicely and still gets the square footage that the applicant is looking for. ■ Mud room on first floor, maybe needs a door from the side yard. Would be beneficial to be able to come off the driveway and come in the mud room. Would not hurt elevation. CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes August 12, 2013 On the right side elevations, are those corbels? (Raduenz: Correct.) They should be called out on the plans. Commissioner Yie recused herself as he resides within 500-feet of the property. She left the chambers. Public comments: None. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Gaul made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. Chair Sargent called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2-1 (Commissioners Bandrapalli and Davis absent, Commissioner Yie recused). Appeal procedures were advised. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This ifem concluded at 8:27 p.m. Commissioner Yie returned to the dias. 2 i`"�'�� BURLINGAME '�' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: '/ � Design Review ❑ Variance ,� Parcel #: �Z�v � ��`f � �� ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:� O Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person� OK to send electronic copies o documents� Name: L d� Address: � ��_�� s�- � /`f City/State/Zip: �� -a ,i � 7�"�� Phone: �i'S �� 3b� Fax: '�' ✓ �J� ' - �` / DESIGNER project contact OK to send electronic copies of dog Name: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ to send electronic copies of documents� Name: � ( �i`' Address: ��Z �� City/State/Zip: �G(,�i✓G�. � �T�� Phone Fax: �p�0, 33� �v.(o(v(v � E-mai�: ��1� 3 � ��/r�/�i. �✓��' Q Address: 3��/ �' � �- '�� City/State/Zip: �1✓ T /v!flV�{s� �ri / T�7 � - . � , �..� d �� Phone: �� Dj0 . � � , � Fax: '� .�,� •,��r_ � .- E-mail: �� /�I1�Dit/E�FSIbi✓. CDl� _ .,,�: r. * Burlingame Business License #: 2� �0 � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �n- ��a/�L- 6 ��tSE G�/ 2�� /'�A-��E �_ s�� G�� rb Sl AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby i best of my knowledge and beli �, Applicant's signature: I am aware of the proposed application Commission. , Property owner's signature: Date Date submitted �-- G �-E under pe Ity of perjury that the information given herein 's tru and correct to the Date: �G- �3 he�eby au�Jx�r'�e the,�abov,e applicant to submit this application to the Planning '�;'-�3--I� (o�f 2� �3 * Verification that the project architectldesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. 5:1HaN�ours�PcapP�ication Zoos.handout.doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: �, C�"Tl un � �Si �j h �P�.� ��.�,✓ �� 1 r57" G�d S� c. o r1 d -� �o o� a c� c�; �'�� -iv G�►� eX �' S�"l n�j S i n�� e -�aw.�( Cl�.,� ll��l Kev: Abbreviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelc DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New SFD Sin le Famil Dwellin SP Special Permit .+ . , � � � . � � . �" .: 4�.�}{�. ' `, �`�.'��t"� �'+�' �� i . t� y-�_' - ['�5., -�i4` r''�!lx�`.li ti '�� f � �" � �` F.,.� � TF , � k �4 . �� ,� � � �� . �� .�� . � . s� : . s 'e . ��. ' � r,�p °'i f's ��' y �'' ��.. ... C.� ,R{�r�' � _ � - r x� :'F2° ��'•��,� ..s ��f_ ' �a�. .£ �3 # '�'i.'� 4� 1"�':7�.'��rR s � 4 �1 ` w � �i �` �, � �� p f !.: "ni '"''� � �'ti, �r '"��'t''�'� � � � � , �. ,, � :. �f�� .`., �°, � �� , , ti �w _ ,_ . . ��t �4 .j� M ` �. } r�ar ��i f - 3k'�`, �°ml 1.��.�'`"' ' 1 .�'�l ,;,'� 1�� } ` y, �,i+G t `�•' ' _Y��,.. 'l i ` •t�� ". , .. ) ' � _ ' �'� �b�*�'� N' ` �t� �.' �''� i a +� �� : �fi � ' � S� � . n �� ..-+^r�� - �" . ' � � � d -. . � . � . _ _ _. . _�..A:'.� ♦ . . �...7'f Y , . � Y�t 5'�r� �� .d,"- � � �•y (�� : �� lYF„� � � -�'� 0 �;�, � �' l,. � �� '.� _.. d,..y'r'Y ✓. ;Sw �`, :. ., y .R_�� .I�j-. � � . �� 4 � `. �f•�. 7i ��r�`� l.�}� �. Q� i r' _ . �' ii 4.-:..---- � _ -__. Y ' "►'�� M., � � — � `, ^ :�. ,,�Ry . '..y ' � �,�.�`. .._... � �ar . a � ." . ��r :, ��"y }" "��e' "� � -. "� � �.. S�, r� y ♦ N: . ' �,3+.�y� ; p �--a k ~ , f; ' �y'" . : v r7(�f! �'t � A'..Y . � � i,d+�y;+4rt3` �-. r.+r 4 'Sh: i.",+'y �� .: 'S_,� � .. .' � � f ✓ �i'��$� � A a?%�eC "+�,}"��' �'. � �. � M � , �# � .. . F �L w ,�y. � � � . scf� % y �: X �f,�r� �� i ��t:' � r ;v`� '�' a � . .. y� � -. � ... y � Er ' r �.J. .�n . . ' _ '1 � ♦ I � ° j� . . .. , -.... 1016 DRAKE 8� 1 O1 2 DRAKE (SUBJECT PROPERTY) (E) TREES TO BE PROTECTED FOR BOTH PROPERTIES PRIVACY Photo ra hs of Nei hborhood , - Scale SA �'H 1020 DRAKE 101 6 DRAKE 101 2 DRAKE (SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1008 DRAKE 1004 DRAKE CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben From: mikereed@gmail.com on behalf of djsilentmic@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:32 PM To: CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben Subject: Proposed Remodel/Addition at 1012 Drake Ave. (Bertetta's) Ruben, I understand that you're the planner on this project, My wife and I live in one of the houses across the street. We've had a chance to look at the renderings of the proposed remodel/addition to the property across the street and think it'd be a nice addition to our street. Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know. Regards, Mike and Kate Reed August 2, 2013 City of Burlingame Planning Department Attn: Erika Lewit Re: 1012 Drake Avenue, Burlingame remodel/addition We have reviewed, with Fred and Jennifer Bertetta, the plans and rendering of the proposed remodel/addition to their home at 1012 Drake. We think the design is outstanding. It should be a lovely addition to our neighborhood and to the City of Burlingame. They are good neighbors and we all look forward to seeing this beautiful remodeled home. Thank you for your consideration. Nancy and Jack Finney 1020 Drake Avenue Burlingame, Ca. 94010 (650)343-6188 � , • To: City of Burlingame Planning Department C'U,11,1IC%:A�/c':1I /C.i:1' 1�1:('l�:ll ��L.1 ' AF'�FK �xr_r�-�r�:r��i��N OF .ST.--1 FF R1: PUI1 T Attn: Erika Lewit, Connie Rihm Subject: 1012 Drake Avenue Remodel/Addition 08.12.13 PC Meeting Agenda Item 7 1012 Drake Avenue ! h�ve reviE��r�e� the piai�s & rendering witn ivlr. & Mrs. Fred Bertetta, III and are happy with designed plans for their new home. , fVame: � /��%i�%�� , � '`� A � �� a, ddress. � � Date: �J � � ' �� ll �� %�- �� -��2--, �` Project Comments �_. Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: July 23, 2013 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 0 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Erika Lewit, Planning re-route of 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-184-110 No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 6-14-2013 will apply to this project. Reviewec ate: 7-24-2013 ., � .. . _ _� w. ,,.. a, .,,��. . a.a , . . ... . , . � Project Comments Date: To: From: June 13, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, AP N : 026-184-110 Staff Review: June 17, 2013 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. 2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve- month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Buiiding Division prior fio the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 12) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14) how the dimensions to adjacent structures. 15) ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_ps. Note: The area labeled "Den" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 16) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 17) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 18) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 19) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 20) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. 2010 CBC §2113.9 NOTE: A written response to the item noted here and plans that specifically address item 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. _ ,� Reviewed�b�— "" � Date: 6-14-2013 � `_ Joe yr, O �'50-558- 270 Project Comments Date: To: From June 13, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-726Q X Parks Division (sso) s5s-73sa � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-184-110 Staff Review: June 17, 2013 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 2. Complete Water Conservation in Landscape Ordinance checklist (attached). 5�b r+^z-�.a 3. Protect City street tree during all phases of construction, ��`� �. �Z. ,3 Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 6/1M13 OUTDO�R WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST . _..-.�...�._ry�^^yt--^r•�"+". ' -r„�"Y-� T T-^ •1r�^.• L-;r c ac ��. —r -a �,._,._�- CdQe� a ' /€''�'r:iw' a •C S ��;�� "�rr�,c,�G ��'� �iK�'ia;�.t, S , k� rY �,i-5 � {�} �.r, L� ��:�� Z t � � � ,, yV} �� i �� hr�.F �"�j�` i�`y� T�!•�a,c� .��. ''� ��" '��i'.�J��.��.��'"t,.:��':7... R�. .�Lu��.t*ii � -n, .. �k��•',�'�'; �t �.:i��tL�'.� �3k.�� -,�� -L�t'"��'�'�r'r� ��isS�� .;:.en.�.. i.�,e �.�_� a r• li ccrtify Ihnt"Elle SubjeCt , rV�E�ct nu��ts tne� S�)PClfl��:i r+•ryiiir��nt��nt; �� the lNll��r i�nn•;� rv�liioil/1'1 l.��n�: ,c „�� n+; �irdint��iCe. r � � � / �i � ; � � �. ` L_�-'� �.., � ' 2� �� ;� -----�----- �, '� ;,,�t.,-., :�,::�• ' ; - — - _ -_.---_- if ` n��:e Farnily �I ;.'u:ti-F.;n iiy 'J Cornmerc�a� U In�,litut�cn�� _.) 1-r f;�tion nnl}� ,-1 Ir,tiu;t'ial JOt�;ur: r ,;,,,,,,� .��,t ,,,,�„�,��.��,�,: U �:��„�;,�:, �.�,�,�,,. ,;: � � � 2 � q 2 2 v � ,,,, r---- - � I rc� rrt ,�te /lddress� /� � ,I� Agency Review �i 1 ------�� !_�-� _ �- " -�v�r- ('�,��ct �rr_a (s[;.fL or::c��•): �/ Z� � �t u� iliiit�,. �' r. �� vieter;: l jPass) (Fall) � iut.tll:�ncsca;>e,'1rc,� �,. .j: i� J �! �I l+:r` Ir; i��tC:l �lrc� (�c� ft.): , �, :.1 U �i ----- �I � Wc�n iurf IrriE;,�tcd rlr��,i (�;q.f�.}: I U .� � � , S��ci;�l I.ancisca��e ilr��,i (SI.i1) (�sq.`t.): "- U U �, � W,itcrFeature5ur{,i��l1r��.�(�ci.ft.): -- � . , . � .. . - . , :;� , iurf i� ; lh;,n 27`:: c` t�ier I,�nil��.,�:�e �'��: i� y;:•; ---------- •.O'. .�.� J._. �i , ; t.:" .. , ., ..�tt _ ,.,,��,;c U '•'o �t � � - _ _ -----._ i�.i :urr a�eas }r�� ..; f,��:t �.:��i.� y,:. J ��l ___-- - _ _ _ . _ _ �Ail iurr is pianted nri �Jo,�� •�: ?`.i',;, 'fr.�, ❑ ❑ � Non=iurf nt I��asl f0',:> or nnn luri :;n�:� ir, nalivc Ycs — 0 U � or low �vater usu {�I,�nt�, J �Jn, Se�• lN,it��r Bu�l�;et Hydrozones i'Irintti are E:rou{.ic�l l�y I ly�lr:,icne, � Y��s U U � p >>( I��ast 2-inci�rs r,` mul; ii �in i�,::;osed Y�� U J � h7ulcfi :o i �Uf�$C��S � lrri�ation Sysiem Efficiency 7Q',"� [�in (ICQ;: FTr: f��r ti_;�•.) ,�Y,,�: ❑ _1 ' __ -- _ _ _..._---__ .. I`10 overs^r3y or runnf� �'!��. U ,.! � Irri��tion System Design tiy ;tem efficiency : 7iF,': Ye�: U U � �utonlatic., self-ndjiisrinr; irrif;,iti�n U No, nnt rcquired ior ��icr L O ❑ �� 9 � � �onhollt r r.�, � , - - -- --- �, p ni i turt Cnsur� ui r� nti r hu:ait� �e•:, ❑ :...! �� 4, - - — -- -- � �•.n s��rayneods �n •. t�-` :rcr� .�ir�,; Y�• : U J � Irri��ation Tlme �'(Stf'!i' 01: �� O;lf•f�?�V � �:i`(:':i:i• � r: {�i':i l.� ..� � ;:�,�� io a�.� i Meterine Sep�r7te ;r�igation mctcr •IJ��, not n��uirr.d 'pecaus�= <`,,f100 sq.ft. 0 U , U Y�•�� Swlmniing !'ools / Spas Ccwc�r hii;nly ic�:onirnrncic��l �//l, U Yes U U I� � V p� E � r-• U iVc, n��t ra�r�u�rc�i � Water Features Etcurcu!�;in�; /�/� U Y�� , ❑ J Le,, titan 1Q;' o: !;tr�cl�,c..:�� ir�� . � U 1'c:. J - J Documcntation Cii��c�:lfst ^� �1��°: � J :J ' - ---- -- -- — - -----_ i L;,nCsc�pe �'d ir ��,�itic��i IJ, •;�:n :'lan '_t P�r;i;ir,t�l :�y <<ppiic3nt U J �prep.�r��i t�y Firofessionai _._._. _.----- --.__.. _ __.__ ��Jatcr E3udget (opcional) �,` r _.1 ('rep,ucd by <ipplicant ❑ l...l � v V � 'J prep:ued by �rofessio�ial + ,Auclit Post•inst211ation auclit com{�I��ted !J Cc�m��leterd by applieant ❑ ❑ � � � ConiE�!��l��l hy profeSSiGnal �•�-:z��---�-�_-:�-.-�._..- .�--.--��'===''-==-�'_._.. ;y-,.-�.--_.-.__ z•s—::,r _,__._.__,__.�; Project Comments Date: To: From: June 13, 2013 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-184-110 Staff Review: June 17, 2013 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 6/25/2013 Project Comments Date: To: From: June 13, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 8 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-184-110 Staff Review: June 17, 2013 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � Date: / � i��— f � Project Comments Date: To: June 13, 2013 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review for first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1012 Drake Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-184-110 Staff Review: June 17, 2013 1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single family home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/bs_new_development.php#flyers 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/Countywide_Program_B MP_Plan_Sheet_Jun2012.pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/ Architectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL. pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD Date: 6/17/13 �-� Skk MAT[G COUNT'f5410[ Water Pollution Prevention Program Clean Water. Healchy Ccmmun�;y. Construction Best Management Practices BMPs � ) Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, as they apply to your project, all year long. Nlaterials & �'4'aste �lanagement Non-H:¢arJous Matcriala ❑ Eknn and co�er sla:kpiles of s,nd, din o. nihcr cunstt�wnon matenal ��ith ums �� Mn nin �s Fwccasi o. ifn.,� xii�cl. bcmF us.d .� ithin Iada.s O Uu fbui don'� u��cniu) rcclnm�cd uaicr lor du:i conlrol HuarAous Matcrials ❑ lab,:l nll haiardous ma�cnals and haiarduus ��asics isuch as peseicides, poin�s, thinners. sobrn¢, f�eL od, and antiGttze) in aeewdnnee ��i�h cih�. counrv, :�aie and fedenl rcgula�ions. ❑ S�ore haeardoia mutcrials and aas�cs in �caecr Gghi comairiers, smrc m approprialc sccondan containmcnt, and .o�cr �um ai thc cnd of cccn� ��orl; da� or durinF �cc� ��cmhcr or w-hcn rain is I:xcws� ❑ Follow� manufncmrcr's appficm�on mswnions for 6Nardous mmerials and be car¢(u� �w� m ux i��ore than neccswn. Do not a0pl. chemiwls outdoors �.hen mm � forecase wiehin 74 hours ❑.jrrmige fer appropnate disposil ol'.ill hn�vdous w,is�es. N'm1c Mnnagemrnt ❑ Cm�cr w anc disposal conlaincrs sc mk ��nh iarps ai thc cnd nf cccn� �vork da�� and during wc� aca�hcr ❑ Che<k �cuie dispes�l comainers Gequcnih I'or Icaks a��d to make wre �ha am no� ocer5lled. Necer Iwm doon a dumpseer on the consvuuion si�c O Ckan ur raplace poruble toJcis. uid u�spec� �xm trequcntic for IcakS and Sp�IIS. ❑ Disposc ofall �vancs and dcMs pmpcd� Ra��de maccrials and �.ssa-s �ha� can bc recrded (zuch u asphah. comrem. ag�esai, yase ma�<nnls. �rood. � P board p�pc. c�c.) ❑ Disposr af Lquid residucs fmm pou�ts, ihumcrs. sokrn�s, glues. and clwning fluids as hazardous �vaslc. Constructiun Enlrancc anJ Perimcicr O Es�ablish and mainmin clTcnicc panmcicr contruL and s�abi6ic all wrtsm�c[ion entrances ond e.v[s m sufficien�ly caivol emsion and sediment dluhurga from sim aid uxking oli si�c. ❑ S�vecp or �acuum anr strcet vacking m nedmmlv and uave sedinxnt wuree �o precrnc funher vacking. Ne�er hose dm�n nreea la cicnn up vxking Equipment �tanagement & Spill Control t i4 , � M1t�intenanm anA Parkin� � ❑ Des�yia�e an arw, fined �cith approprmte BMPs. fa .ehicle m�d equipinem parl;uig nM smruge. ❑ Perfomi ma�or mainttn.vice. rcDa�r luhs. �nd ��eh�cle �a �q��,,,rnc „a n�,R mr:�« ❑ If refuelmg or vehicic maimenana mus� be dam onsiic, �rorV. in a bcnned arca a��a� from storm drams and o��er a drip pan big enough io collcct Ilwds. Ren�de or dispose of 8uids u hazardaus �cxsrc. ❑ If �-chlcle or equipmenl cleaning mim be done onsire. deun �ci�� waeer onh in a bemmd arca tliat �vill no� allon �.ater ro nm into gnncrs. ztr<cls. srorm drains, or surF c watcrs. ❑ Do �ro� cic�n �ch�dc or cqnipmrnt mmic usin; soaps, sokrnts, degreasers. s[cam cicanmg cquipment. etc Spi11 Prr��cncion anA Contml ❑ I:cep spill cicanup ma�cnals (rags, absorbcn�s, c�c.) a.ailablc at �hc consmsiion snc at all nmcs ❑ Inspcl �chielcs and equipmcm frcqurntl� f r and rtµ ir Ical:s pmmptic Usc dnp pnns ro uitch leaks nntil repairs arz madc. ❑ Clzan up spJls or leaks immcdiamk w�d Nsposc of cleanup ma�eriaLs properlc ❑ Do �ro� Iwse do.��n surfaces ��hert Iluids ha�e spillcd Ux dn� cicannp mctliods (absorbcm mamnals. w� himr.and/w raFs). ❑ S�.ccp up spJlcd dn� mafcnnls immcdutdc Do no� en io ��ash �hem aoar �aith �cmn. or bur. them. ❑ Clean up spills on dirt amas bc dlgging up ond properk d�sposing oCcontam�naeed soil. ❑ Repon sigmfican� spills immedin¢b-. Yai are reqmiled c M lan m repon aIl significam mlcases uf hn �rdons ma�cnals, including oil. To rcpon a spill-. I) Dial 911 � iv local emergeoc�� fesponse nwiber, 2) Call �he Go�xmor�s OtSce of Emergrnc. Senices Warning Cenier. (81q) 8i2-75i0 (21 hw�rsL EarthFvork & Paving/Asphalt �i'ork Contaminated Soils _ � >}- • ,y - �1W . �.. F� ii� j � ";+�"'" ` ��.� . fi - - � a . . Emsion Cuntml ❑ Schcdulc r}ading and cccaranon ��ort. for dry weatheronh. ❑ Siabiliu ell dnwded arras, insiall and mmntain icmporarc arosion wnwls (mch as emsiai control labnc or bouded fiber miN�) 11111�I ��C�GI�tjOf� IS PSf�b�IShGd. ❑ Seed a plam �xgen�ion for erosiai wntrol on slopcs or e I�ere consbvction rs no� Immcdlamly plennca. SMimcnt Contrul ❑ Proeect swrm drain inkts. guuers, drtches. and dn�nage courses �rith apprupriate BA1Ps. sich sc grarcl bags. fibcr mlLs. bemu etc 0 Re�ent sedwent Crom mi�nting o6sirc by installuis arM maimaining sedimem comwls, such as f ber rolls, sih fences. or scdimcnt basins. ❑ Kccp ccca.atcd wll on IM: sitc �nc�rc it ��'III IlIX COIIKI �I1t0 �lC SIt2C(. ❑ Trans&r esca��alcd matcnals to dump trucks an Ihc silt. not in tlle strttt ❑ Coniam�natW Soils ❑ If am� of tAc follo��ing condicions arc obsened, tul for wn�arninauon a� conWct the Regional Wa�er Qualin� Conttol Board�. ■ Unusunl soil mndiGons. discoloration. oralor. ■ Abandoced uMcrgronnd mnks. ■ .46ando�rcd wells ■ Bwicd bar¢ls. dcbns. or vach. ❑.4�aid ry eine and seal coanng m�cei ��catlur, wehen rain is forews� teforc frcah pavcmcm w ill harc iimc io cum. ❑ Co��cr siomi drain inlcts and manholcs �.hcn appl� ing scal coai. �acA coa�. slum seil, fng scal, e�c. ❑ Collect and rmcle or appropna�el� dispou ofexcess abrasive grarcl or sm�d Da NOT mcep or �vash ii mm guucrs. ❑ Do irot use ��ater ro��ash do�� n fresl� aspluh concrem pavcmam. San cutting & .45phalUConcrcle Rcmo� el ❑ Comple¢I. cm�er or bamcade nom� dnin inlcu..�hcn sa�. cu«ing L'u f licr fabnc, ca�ch buin Inlct f hcrs. or gra� cl bags �o kap sliun out of [he nom� draln system. ❑ Shm�el. aMsorb, or vacuum w�.-cm slnm and disposc o(all �.-as�c as soon as ron arc fnishcd in oirc locaiion nr ei �he end of wch �vork darc (�chichecrr is sooner'1 O If mucul slum� enters a calch Msin. dcmi ii up �mmcdialcl�. Concrete, Grout & �7ortar Application r - ---- ��'- � -� - i: �: i E, .�. ;�.Y.�i. . - .�i O S�ore coirr<ic. ,�,ou .ind munar under co��e�. oo pauc�s a��a a,s,y Gom drainage arcas. Thcsc m��cnaLs nmsi ncrer rcach a nomi drzm �7 Wasli out ca�crcic cquipmcni�wcls offvre or in a coniained arw, so t6cre ��ro dischargc inw Js und<d� ing »i1 oron[osurtoundingalcaz Lc�c.on<rctc hardcn and disposc of as sar6agc. ❑ Collcci ihc ��ash ��aicr fmm u�ashmg e�posed aggresa�e wixrcic a�id rCmo��C n (or appropnalc disposal ofTsi�c Dewatering � f _ �= '�Y ^%.,i . �..'G�`�\ :�ri��.- 1 v �.n � ❑ Effc<ti�ck managc all run�n, al1 nolf n-i�hui ��c snc. and all runo�i iha� d�schargcs fmm t6c vic D�� cn rw��on �atcr fmm oRsnc a..a� from all disiwbcd areas w olhena��x ensure wmpli�ncc O V.Tcn dacatcring. nouf. a� obiain appro��al from ihe local muniGpaLn b.fort diulurg�np ��aicr io a slrcc� guitcr or siorm drein Fllvanon or di� crsion �hmugh a basm. tanA, or srdimem trap ❑ Ln areas ofknow�n coniaminaiion. iesung is mquired pnor w rcnsc or discha.pz of grnund��alcr. Consuli u�iih Wc Enginccr Io de�enninc �� heihu tcaing is rcquved and ha�� io inicrprci resulu Comamiiuicd yound�. aicr musi bc trca�cd or haukd oti-si�e (or praper d�sposnl Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Painting & paint RemovAl <� • = � _ �#. i �}\ ...• � �'' Paintin�; cicunu�i O Ne� er dwn bmslxs or nnse pami comn�Mrs mo a succi, guncr, siorm dram. or surfncc wa�crs ❑ For �.aicr-bazcd painis, paini oui bn�shcs io Jic c.mni possibk. Rinsc io �hc sanitnry scner once .ou hn�c gaincd pcmussion (roin ��c laal �ras�ewa�er rt.am�em autlwni� Kc��cr pour pami do�.n o dro�n. ❑ Fo� al-batid pa�nts, pa�ni «u bru�hcs io Ihe e.�tcnl poss�blc and elcan u�11� Winncr ml��cni m a proptr conra��cr Filtcr w�d �� sc ihinncrs and sol��cn�s. Disposc of residue and unusable �hinncr.'sphen�s as I�arardous ��asic Paint remo� al rJ Cheniical pa�nr smpping msiduc aiM <hips and dusi from merinc pain�s or pa�ms comaimug Irad or tribun I�n musi bc disposcd ofas haiardnus ��ac�; ❑ Paini cliips and dusl fmm nonJ�aiardcw�s dn stripp�ng and sinG bl�ning n�y� pc .�rcpi up nr collcued in plasiic dmp �loihs mid dispo. A ofas vash Landscape 19aterials �i , ti� , ��. . f q.�`�``� t O Con�ain s�oeApiled landscaping maicnnls b� c�or�ng ��cin undcr urps �.�I�cn ihcr arc naa<ii.cl� bcinguscd. ❑ s��G �ma�ni� i,�d�x �,m��i o� pallcLs. Co��cr or norc Il� �Sc malcnals �chen ihc. arc noi acncdr hing uscd or appl�cd ❑ Disconenuc applica�ion ofanr crod�blc landsope mmenel �� Niin 2 da� s bcfo¢ a fomc.ui ro�n crcn� or dunng n<� �� cnihcr � SAN MA7 FO[pUMSYWIOF WaterPof�ution Prevention Program Qcin Wama Mhtt1+y Cu*mar.iiy Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Gopper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes info contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architecturai copper. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) discharges to storm drains. Building with copper gutter and drainpipe. must be implemented to prevent prohibited During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs� o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by instailing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. �;;�r , ; �,-,,r :. � �� , �� , .�a.�a. � ---� " .r` ",;� r�f -• r + �--- �� .tk�� d �.•- �� r�9.AtiA -� -�b c'e�i(� J r� -: :rarn -�na� Wi'dn12 Sanctuary Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Poliution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.org (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and drsposed of prope�ly. RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review for a new, two-story house and detached qaraqe at 1012 Drake Avenue, Zoned R-1, Fred and Jennifer Bertetta, propertv owners, APN: 026-184-110; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Auqust 26, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and negative declaration, per Negative Declaration No. ND-564-P is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th dav of Auqust, 2013, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review. 1012 Drake Avenue Effective September 6, 2013 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 22, 2013, sheet T1, GN, GP, SP, A62.0, A2.0- A5.0 and Boundary Survey and Topographic Map and date stamped August 12, 2013, sheets G1.0, A1.0, L1.0 and L1.2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 14, 2013 and July 24, 2012 memos, the Parks Division's June 14, 2013 memo, the Engineering Division's June 25, 2012 memo, the Fire Division's June 15, 2012 memo, and the Stormwater Division's June 18, 2012 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration and Design Review. 1012 Drake Avenue Effective September 6, 2013 10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 13. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 15. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 16. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD n� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ��" :, PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1012 DRAKE AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Applicatian for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage at 1012 DRAKE AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 026-184-110 Mailed: August 16, 2013 (Please refer to other sideJ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlina_ A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) �� ", _ , � - � � ` � . • Y R �' '� \ _ �. �� `� Y+ t. r „ • ��" � � , '�''�' �I�`��' � ' ,:� .� s. �� •� f 1j �� >.i;�� r' +' �r . ,� , � � � ^ � ,•iI ,e �,�� ;, ' � y � �� / � �� 1� � , rr � M�-�' �Y �y}. > \ � � � � ��: ; � . .R�'. . � . �. � � .�.r� � �$ �� . . � ¢�/ '� ^��;�' �r , . . � � .,!�. � x , ,�,.�, �. ,r �: ' �` '.�' � � -�, ,+,�� . � , _ • � .�,r ,,. `, • ,y,�y. -� '. . .'L..�� /oJ tr ,� .� `'•x1! .t . �� I _ � Y ; 7�� ,> . � ., :� � � ' � � ,�'� '� ►� s �+�'" � `� r �i , �t' ,. .s j ` � � ' � . li� f+t v + Y ~+. ;�:' � i' } � � ,:p 1 �' � � w .�,►�"�`r y � � � ,, x , J � "�� `r +� � • �I # � � , °� � "J'�� 1 • .�s � � � � ,';��ap� � r .�. . ' � : ti� � { `_ +�;'_ �'"� �� w � �� . . � J�,.�� .�c /� r a{r � � " . .� �� ,� ,, � �M'. ,\'"i W`� . �� i� �: J �'�, - � % � � • �, _ � � �' � • �'%` •�. �• � r , '� � �- �b`*� � r►•� . �� , a, � ,> $ � , �' � . . � -: t �, � �*? � :_, � , ` �i �' . �• � ` _. . � •'� •I '� � � , 't �� . k� � i .� �� `�a ,� , 5 �, ym'`�,� �`�,,�;,�� " M.2 Q� ,, � , � "`�I � r ��,�w �,: � � . .. " ��Mi '�p` ,� `,. ,� � `'� �,�� r , . �,� �� , �' '� �- y `•,► '` �"�;�,� �, �'� 1 ;, ; . p ` "�;►. J i� � '+��` �' � r . ,'�3'? r . . .' , � ' '�� t' '7 � � �+�i —' . L r. � ' � �• . � �� `� �'� �• - .� � � �,� J�� 'n � � y �� • � � � ` •.'I"' , 4J � ; � � " � ��'� � . .: ��.(�� w�. � .'�'�. a 't . f � � �'y� � 3 �r,,�, d , t � � ' �'� `a � . �¢ ��,�^ ; 'r ':.� .� � � ' '�` � 1s � "O� �I'. � .� � ' • 7 � � ~ •� j0 si� ^�• ,.., �' Q �� • , � �M" � r� ' ` � f � � . � ` .� �,. � . ., �r ,� , ��' �."�,.. �. �, L,- � ��" �� e� r� . � . � � , a '�� 1 ' , b' � _ ♦ r � � ... . .w. .y . }a '�� ,s�{�:j +r �' r�w..,". �'� • �+�. Property Assessment CURRENT INFORMATION SINGLE FAMILY RES (O1) Land Area (sq. ft.): 6250 Year Built: 1924 Base Area (sq. ft.): 2230 Total Rooms: � 7 No. of Bedrooms: 3 No. of Bathrooms: 3.5 � � ` / � Summ: APN: Owner i: Owner 2: Care Of: Owner Address: Page 1 of 2 iry of Property Details 026184110 Bertetta Fred Iii Tr Bertetta Jennifer Gambrioli Tr Bertetta Fred & )ennifer Trust 1012 Drake Ave Burlingame CA 94010--4913 Situs Address: 1012 Drake Ave Burlingame Legal Description: District: Neighborhood: Secured Assessment Roll: 2012-1 Assessee Details Assessment V Owner 1: BERTETTA FRED III Land: TR Temp Land: Root: Owner 2: BERTETTA JENNIFER GAMBRIOLI TR Min/Mineral: Improvements Care Of: BERTETTA FRED & (Structure): JENNIFER TRUST Temp Improvements (Structure): Owner Address: 1012 DRAKE AVE Fixtures: BURLINGAME, CA Total Gross: 94010-4913 Total Temp: Exemption - Home Document Number: 2009061596 Owner: Exemption - Other: Net Assessed: I LOT 11 BLOCK 32 EASTON ADD BURLINGAME NO 2 RSM A/72 1 013A alues Assessment Details $615,743 Assessment Type: Annual Temp Code: Notice Date: $615,743 Change #: TRA: 004001 $1,231,486 PUC: O1 $7,000 PUC Description: Single Family Residence $1,224,486 Current ]urisdictions Current Tax Rate Area #004001 Supervisorial: 1 GENERAL TAX RATE GENERAL COUNTY TAX COUNTY DEBT SERVICES Congressional: 14 CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY BURLINGAME TAX BURLINGAME DEBT REDUCTION SERVICES Assembly: 22 BURLINGAME ELEM GENRL BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER PURPOSE 93A 938 Senatorial: 13 BURLINGAME ELM BOND SER BURLINGAME EL BD 97 BURLINGAME EL BD REFUND 93C SER Election 1013 gURLINGAME REFUND. SER. BURLINGAME ELEM BOND BURLINGAME EL BOND 2010 Precinct: z004 SER 2008 SER B BURLINGAME EL BOND ELEC SAN MATEO HIGH GENRL SAN MATEO HIGH BD SER City Name: BURLINGAME 07 SER PURPOSE 2000 A Zip Code: 94010 SAN MATEO HIGH BD SER SAN MATEO UN HIGH BND SAN MATEO HIGH RFND.SER 2002 B SER. 200 2004 M:Fine�:i.n Cne Nnnn http://gis.co.sanmateo.ca.us/wecare/applications/app_PrintReviewMap.asp?RollYear=201... 6/13/2013 Property Use Details Property Assessment Page 2 of 2 , , SAN MATEO UNION HI SER SAN MATEO UNION HI SER SAN MATEO UNION HI SER 2008 A 2009 A 2010 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 2010 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SER 2 SER 201 SER 201 SAN MATEO HIGH 2O12 GO SAN MATEO HIGH ELEC 06 SM JR COLLEGE GEN PUR REF SER201 SM 7R COLLEGE BD 2002 SM ]R COLL BOND SER 2005 SM JR COLL BOND 2001 SER B C SM JR COLL BOND 2006 SER SAN MATEO COMM COLL SM JR COLL BOND REF 2012 A 2005 SER B BAY AREA AIR QUALITY COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT SMC MOSQUITO & VECTOR MANAGEMEN CONTROL PENINSULA HOSPITAL PENINSULA HOSPITAL COUNTY EDUCATION TAX DISTRICT DISTICT TAX http://gis.co.sanmateo.ca.us/wecare/applications/app_PrintReviewMap.asp?Ro1lYear=201... 6/ 13/2013