The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1128-1132 Douglas Avenue - Staff Report (5)Item No. 9d Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 524 Oak Grove Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and Front Setback Variance Address: 524 Oak Grove Avenue Item No. 9d Design Review Study Meeting Date: March 23, 2015 Request: Application for Design Review and Front Setback Variance to demolish the existing house at 524 Oak Grove Avenue and replace it with an existing house to be moved from 1128 Douglas Avenue; the project includes a first and second story addition to the house moved from Douglas Avenue and construction of a new detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. Property Owner: Zers Douglas LLC General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 029-083-010 Lot Area: 8,788 SF Zoning: R-1 Background: The proposed project includes demolishing the existing house at 524 Oak Grove Avenue and replacing it with an existing house to be moved from 1128 Douglas Avenue. The proposal to move the house from 1128 Douglas Avenue is part of a concurrent application to build a new apartment building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue. This application for 524 Oak Grove Avenue includes a first and second story addition to the house moved from Douglas Avenue and construction of a new detached garage. In 2008, the City of Burlingame engaged Carey & Co. to complete an inventory of historic resources for the Downtown Specific Plan Area. The purpose of this inventory was to identify properties that would qualify as historic resources for the City of Burlingame and appeared eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Carey & Co. determined that 23 structures within the Plan Area appeared to be eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP. 1128 and 1132 Douglas Avenue are included on this list. Historic Resource Evaluations (Evaluation) were prepared for 1128 & 1132 Douglas Avenue by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated May 14, 2013. The results of the evaluation concluded that 1128 Douglas Avenue is eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 1(Events) for its association with early settlement patterns in the town of Burlingame. The Evaluation notes that "Because the property was one of the first residences constructed in Burlingame and exemplifies an important pattern of development in Burlingame, the property at 1128 Douglas Avenue appears to be individually significant for its association with early settlement, and is therefore eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 1(Events)." 1128 Douglas Avenue is also eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 2(Persons) due to its association with James R. and Jessie N. Murphy. The Evaluation notes that "James R. Murphy was living in the Burlingame area by 1900 and serving as the town's station master. By 1910 he was county clerk, a position he retained through to his death in 1940. His contributions to Burlingame government and civic life were varied and well documented. Jessie Murphy was also active in Burlingame government and civic life, serving as park commissioner and acting as a lifelong advocate for trees, a subject integral to Burlingame's civic identity as the "City of Trees." Both James and Jessie Murphy lived the majority of their lives in their house in Burlingame and raised three children there. The Murphys' role in the development of Burlingame as well as their long association with the property meet the threshold for significance for listing in the listing in the California Register under Criterion 2(Persons). The Historic Resource Study for 1128 Douglas Avenue is attached. The results of the evaluation for 1132 Douglas Avenue concluded that it is not eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. The purpose of this design review study meeting is to provide initial comments on design elements as they relate to the project at 524 Oak Grove Avenue (compatibility of the architectural style with the neighborhood, architectural style and mass, parking and garage patterns, interFace with structures on adjacent properties and landscaping). A separate environmental scoping meeting will be held once an environmental consultant is chosen. Design Review and Front Setback Variance 524 Oak Grove Avenue Project Description: The subject property is located at the corner of Oak Grove Avenue and Marin Drive. For setback purposes, the shorter frontage along Marin Drive is considered to be the lot front. The proposed project includes demolishing the existing two-story house, attached garage and detached shed on the site located at 524 Oak Grove Avenue. Rather than building a new house on the property, the applicant is proposing to move the existing house currently located at 1128 Douglas Avenue onto this site as part of a concurrent application to build a new 29-unit apartment building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue. This application includes a first and second story addition to the house moved from Douglas Avenue and construction of a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue. Planning staff would note that compliance with the R-1 District development regulations is based on a new house being proposed on the lot. The existing two story house currently located at 1128 Douglas Avenue contains 2,676 SF of floor area (includes a 100 SF covered porch exemption). In conjunction with moving the house to 524 Oak Grove Avenue, the applicant is proposing a remodel and addition to the existing house, which includes demolishing approximately one-half of the rear of the house (669 SF of the first floor and 524 SF of the second floor) (see Demolition Floor Plan on sheet A2.1 d). With the proposed first and second floor addition at the rear of the house and a new one- car detached garage, the floor area will increase to 4,013 SF (0.45 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 4,037 SF (0.46 FAR). The proposed project is 24 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site for the proposed four bedroom house. The applicant is proposing to build a new detached one-car garage (12'-10" x 23'-5" clear interior dimensions); one uncovered parking space is provided in the driveway. The driveway and detached garage would be accessed off Marin Drive. The existing curb cut and driveway apron along Oak Grove Avenue will be removed. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design Review to demolish the existing house at 524 Oak Grove Avenue and replace it with an existing house to be moved from 1128 Douglas Avenue; the project includes a first and second story addition to the house moved from Douglas Avenue and construction of a new detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)); and ■ Front Setback Variance to the second floor of the house (18'-0" proposed where 20'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (a) (b) (3)). The subject property contains a total of ten existing trees, six of which are of protected size (measuring 20.9 to 52 inches in diameter). This application includes removing three of the protected size trees, including two Olive trees (17.8 and 19.3-inch diameter), an 18.5-inch diameter Spanish Fir Tree and four non-protected size trees. A Protected Tree Permit will be required from the Parks Division for removal of the protected size trees. There are also several street trees in front of the subject property, including two Stone Pine trees along Marin Drive (60.4 and 54.3 inches in diameter) and an Olive tree along Oak Grove Avenue (14 inches in diameter). Both Stone Pine trees will remain; the Olive tree will be removed. In his memo dated June 19, 2014, the City Arborist notes that the existing Olive tree has poor structure and may be removed as part of this project. An arborist report, dated August 11, 2014, was prepared by Mayne Tree Expert Company, which evaluates several trees on the site as well as the street trees located within the City's planter strip an provides tree protection specifications (see attached). The City Arborist/Park Supervisor reviewed and accepted the report, noting in his memo that "Tree Protection must be in place during all phases of construction" and that the applicant must "follow independent arborist report for care and maintenance of all trees on site." This space intentionally left blank. 2 Design Review and Front Setback Variance 524 Oak Grove Avenue 524 Oak Grove Avenue �ot Area: �, i�� 5r- Plans Date Stam ed: December 22, 2014 PROPOSED � ALLOWED/REQ'D i SETBACKS ��._..__.........� .......... ..._....._.---....._..__............_.....�.�..�.... �_—__ — .__�_,..�_ .__..._-____ _ Front (1Sf flr): 18' to house � 15'-0"' (15' to overhang) (2"d flr): 18'-0" 2 20'-0" ' _�._......_._._ _....._._...---- ---- --..__._..__..........�......._—....._...---._�._......_._._...._�_....-------- Side (inferior): 12'-7" 7'-0" (exterior— 15t flr): 10'-0" to house 7'-6" (7'-6" to overhang) (exterior— 2"d flr): > 12'-0" average 1 12'-0" average .__. . ...._,._....�..�..........�.._.�.�_._.... ..-�--�-�---___ __ . ._ Rear (15r f/r): 71'-0" to porch � 15'-0" (2"d flr)�_ 77'-0" � 20'-0" -----�---�._ .......,..._ ..................__............._.-__�_._.�._..._- --- Lof Coverage: 2448 SF � 3515 SF 27.8% 40% — _.._.._._._.__..._....._......._..�..._..� ...................._.._.........._ —�_...___.. _. �.�_.._..------_,...�.._...._.�_.._..._..._._. FAR: 4013 SF ' 4037 SF 3 0.45 FAR � 0.38 FAR �....�.._._..._.....__....._...._.�.�_..Y._. — ----_ A__. � ._..,�._.�_.�_.._—_......_......_...._.....___...�....�._ # of bedrooms: 4 --- �� .-�---___..._._........_.. _ ___._..�..._...��.._.. ._ _.�._..__.�.---- __..._—..._. ._....._..__.._...,...._...._ ............. Off-Street Parking: 1 covered � 1 covered (12'-10" x 23'-5") i (10'-0" x 20'-0") 1 uncovered I 1 uncovered (9'-0" x 20'-0") I (10'-0" x 20'-0") __�....... ____�_ _....�......_...-----.—.._..�_.._. .. � .�_ � „ .__.._..—_,..___._.�.._�_._—._....�_............_......�_._.....,�..._.�._ Building Height: 26 -8 i 30 -0 _....--�--....,.__�_ .............,.......�..........._....._.........._-------...._..._._,.�..__ ._.—. : DH Envelope: complies � CS 25.26.075 Since the block average calculation excludes corner lots and the highest and lowest front setbacks, there are no parcels remaining on the block to serve as the basis for the block average. Therefore, the minimum required front setbacks to the first and second floors are 15'-0' and 20'-0", respectively. Front Setback Variance to the second floor of the house (18'-0" proposed where 20'-0" is the minimum required). (0.32 x 8788 SF) + 1100 SF + 324 SF = 4037 SF (0.46 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 3 Design Review and Front Setback Variance 524 Oak Grove Avenue Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Dreiling Terrones Architecture Inc., applicant and architect Zers Douglas LLC, property owner Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Variance Application Arborist Report Prepared by Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc., dated August 11, 2014 Photographs of Neighborhood Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 13, 2015 Aerial Photo Separate Attachments: Historical Resource Evaluation for 1128 Douglas Avenue, prepared by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated May 14, 2013 4 (� 4�1��i�1}$'�� :C�:.�If.� BVRLIN�AME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 029083010 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 524 Oak Grove Ave. APPLICANT project contact person �1 OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: Jacob Furlong Address: 1103 Juanita Ave City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: 650-696-1200 Fax: 650-343-9685 E-mall: jf@dtbarch.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER projectcontactperson❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: Richard Terrones PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Nam@: Jianguang Zha�ig Address: 8 Vista Lane City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: 510-709-5826 Fax: E-mall: henryzhang0913@gmail.com Address: 1103 Juanita Ave City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: 650-696-1200 Fax: 650-343-9685 E-mail: rta(�dtbarch.com * Burlingame Business License #: ry' �.�y'�°� ��m�i �,.,, �,Q- � � � ar�, yv.r.>. a 1 l�vs �a-4 �-,:ry � 5d� �.i� �y�� JUN � � 2014 C�..i"'r` t�}i= t;�J �;�i � �� ;.�,R�� . r„-,;_,-��..,��^�r,��,�� a r;�f. PROJECT DESCRIPTION � Relocation of existing single family residence. Design review for placement of structure with addition and alteration. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie . ApplicanYs signature: Date: � I am aware of the propos applica on an he by authorize the above applicant to submit this applica ion to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: • - Date: � d Date submitted: �' 13' `fi' * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. S:I HANDOUTS�PCApplicotion.doc IT 4 '.�� .�`,,�" _ .;��c ._ : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org Second floor setback Variance �� :+ � �� - 3 2014 .�.� ,... . _ : -��uRu�!c�,h�E c��:�-��_,�,r�nir�G ��,�. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type orwrite neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. See attached. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ofa substantial property right and what unreasonahle property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. See attached. c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will nof be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. See attached. d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? See attached. Handouts\Variance Application.2008 Q�t'� Dr?iiina Terrones A.r�.'r,iter,��tre Inc,. :arcr�irevtur� ( inSres'ruc'�Jre . E:nvironr:�er.t; City of Burlingame Variance Application Second floor setback Variance 524 Oak Grove Ave. a. The historic portion of the house that is being relocated from 1128 Douglas Ave. has a second floor that is stacked and aligned directly over the first floor. WE propose setting the relocated structure to meet the 15t floor (15') front setback due to extraordinary site constraints (triangular lot and protected-sized trees). We are therefore asking for relief from the 2"d floor (20') setback. The proposed house addition along the front fa�ade is designed to harmonize with the historic structure. The addition is generally a first floor roof plate, with a gable sloping away from the front property line. b. The existing historic portion of the house that is being relocated is proportionally small relative to the overall property size (8,787 s.f.) In order to be marketable, the addition is proposed, but the proposed total F.A.R. is still 112 s.f. below the allowable maximum. Due to the unique property shape and protected trees, the variance is necessary to accommodate the proposed addition that other properties might enjoy with out special consideration. c. The proposed residence with the addition is consistent with the existing residential fabric of the neighborhood. The house, with its addition, will be surrounded by streets on three sides, and the proposed driveway on the fourth side. Therefore, there will be no detrimental impact on any specific neighbors or the neighborhood in general. d. The proposed addition is consistent with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing structure being relocated, and consistent with the eclectic residential neighborhood in general. � �:� � , �-�. � �� ,.��.. �.,� ;�JOV � 3 2014 i;i i�Y 0;= E3URLINGAME CC:�-P,A�1N1(JG D'sU. . ,... ,, , ,; ., n � i r J� �� . � f '� i � i � ., . . . � ..E.,. ._ �-, . .:: ;::•� „ .. , .,. .,.; . � : treei _ f c:cl�i: ,i, - ..m.. ;�3 ., .. . :. .,. _. ... . � .� ...:.. � _ . _ . . . . ... ,. ... . . . . . . �.,.;^9c �.:. ..t.7:`. ,. �>� �r . ...... � .c.c .; � . ...�`.• �� .... :....,. . Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. ESTABLISHED 1931 STATE COIVTRACTOR'S LiCENSE IVO. 276793 CERTIFIED FORESTER • CERTIFIED ARBORISTS • PEST CONTROL • ADVISORS AND OPERATORS RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON 535 BRAGATO ROAD, STE. A PRCSIDCNT SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6311 JEROMEY 1NGALLS CONSULTANT/ESTIMATOR August 11, 2014 TELEPHONE: (650) 593-4400 FACSIMILE: (650) 593-44i3 EMAIL: info@maynetree.cam Mr. Wayne Lin, LEED AP Dreiling Terrones Architecture, Inc. 1105 Juanita Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mr. Wayne Lin, RE: 524 OAK GROVEAVENUE, BURLINGAME At your request, I visited the above site on Thursday, July 31, 2014. The purpose of my visit was to identify, inspect, and comment on the trees located on the site. Included in this report is a plan review and tree protection plan for the proposed construction project. Limitations of this report This report is based on a visual-only inspection that took place at ground level. I accept no responsibility for any unknown or any unseen defects associated with the trees on this site. Method Each tree on this report is given an identification number, which is scribed on to a metal foil tag and placed at eye level on the trunk of the tree. This number is also placed on the provided site map to show the approximate location of the trees on the property. The diameter for each tree was found by measuring the trunk of the tree at fifty-four inches off of the natural grade as described in the Burlingame Heritage Tree Ordinance. The height and canopy spread has been estimated for each tree to show their approximate dimensions. Each tree was given a condition rating; this rating is based on form and vitality and can be further defined by the following table: 0 — 29 Very Poor 30 — 49 Poor 50 — 69 Fair 70 — 89 Good 90 — 100 Excellent Lastly, a comments section has been provided to give more individual detail about the trees. 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame 2 Tree Survey Tree Species Diameter Condition Height Spread Comments # (inches) (percent) (feet) (feet) August 11, 2014 1 Olive 13.1 35 15 21 Root crown covered by soil, ivy, and organic material; topped at 12 feet; canopy leans south; growing into the wires; lower trunk is hollow; roots lifting the curb and street. 2 3 4 Coast Live Oak Coast Live Oak Monterey Pine r� • 40.7 52.0 (est.) 5 Olive 19.3 6 Spanish 18.5 Fir 7 Olive 17.8 45 .� 50 20 40 .� 27 Codominant at 1 foot with included bark; root crown covered; pipe embedded in the lower trunk; ivy growing up the trunk into the upper canopy; abundance of interior deadwood; leans south; healthy canopy; measured below the codominant attachment. 54 Partially covered root crown; girdling root at the base; codominant at 6 feet; most of the canopy growth is to the south; excess end weight on the lateral limbs; limbs touching the roof; farge interior deadwood present; healthy canopy. 63 Root crown covered by ivy and other organic material; ivy growing up the trunk; high-voltage lines going through the canopy; history of limbs failing over the street; excess end weight on the lateral limbs over the street; large deadwood present; abundance of pine cones; pitch math present. 35 15 15 Partially covered root crown; codominant at 2 feet with included bark; interior deadwood present; measured below the codominant attachment; suppressed growth by tree #3. 55 70 21 Root crown covered; ivy growing up the trunk; abundance of interior deadwood; top leans northeast. 30 15 24 Root crown covered; codominant at 1 foot; measured below codominant attachment; top growing southeast; abundance of interior deadwood; poor form and vigor; ivy growing up the trunk. 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame 3 Tree Species Diameter Condition Height Spread Comments # (inches) (percent) (feet) (feet) August 11, 2014 8 Italian 60.4 55 40 63 Root crown covered with ivy; Stone Pine codominant at 5 feet with included bark; holly sapling growing out of main attachment; long heavy lateral limbs; codominant attachments in the upper canopy; large dead limb over the street; roots lifting the street. 9 Italian 54.3 Stone Pine Observations 60 35 69 Root crown covered; ivy growing up the trunk; codominant at 8 feet; heavy lateral limbs; roots lifting the curb, the gutter, and the street; several crossing limbs (some grafted together) in the upper canopy; excess end weight on the lateral limbs growing over the street. Tree #1 is an Olive tree located within the planter strip along Oak Grove Avenue. Ivy, soil, and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. Roots from this tree are lifting the curb and the street slightly. The upper canopy is routinely topped at 12 feet by PG&E to minimize growth into the high-voltage wires. Approximately 20 feet away from the base of the tree in the same planter strip, I found an active yellow jacket nest. Tree #2 is a Coast Live Oak located near the driveway behind a fence. Leaf litter, soil, and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. There is a codominant attachment at 1 foot off of the natural grade with included bark between the two stems. The upper canopy leans south due to a competition for light with the adjacent Coast Live Oak canopy. A large square pipe is embedded in the lower trunk. Tree #3 is a large Coast Live Oak located in the rear of the home. I found several Pine roots girdling the lower buttress roots at the base of this Oak and a small amount of ivy growing up the lower trunk. There is a codominant attachment at 6 feet and an abundance of large interior deadwood. Most of the upper canopy leans to the south with excess end weight on many of the lateral limbs. Many of these lateral limbs are touching the roof of the existing home. Tree #4 is a large Monterey Pine located on the right side of the home, along the property line fence. A significant amount of ivy, pine needles, and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. There are several stubbed off limbs in the lower canopy where the previous failures have occurred. Many of the lateral limbs have excess end weight and are in need of end weight reduction. High-voltage lines are going through the middle canopy of this tree and there are several large dead limbs in the interior of this canopy. Tree #5 is an Olive tree located along the rear of the property. This tree has a codominant attachment at 2 feet with included bark between the two stems. Tree #3 has suppressed the growth of this tree creating a competition for light and undesirable form of the upper canopy. 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame 4 August 11, 2014 Tree #6 is a Spanish Fir located on the left side of the home near the left corner property line. Ivy and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. There is an abundance of interior deadwood in the upper canopy, which leans northeast slightly. Tree #7 is an Olive tree located on the left side of the property. This tree has a codominant attachment at 1 foot. The upper canopy is growing to the southeast toward the existing home. This tree has poor form and vigor and an abundance of interior deadwood. Tree #8 is an Italian Stone Pine located within the planter strip along Marin Drive. Ivy, soil, and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. I noticed several targe upwelling areas of the street near the base of the tree that appear to be from the tree's surface roots. There is a codominant attachment at 5 feet with included bark between the two stems. A small Holly sapling appears to be growing out of the included bark area of the codominant attachment. There is an abundance of lateral limbs with excess end weight growing over the street and several codominant attachments in the upper canopy. I identified one large dead limb located over the street. Tree #9 is an Italian Stone Pine located on the corner of Oak Grove Avenue and Marin Drive. Ivy, soil, and other organic material cover the root crown of this tree. I identified a codominant attachment at 8 feet and excess end weight on the lateral limbs. The roots of this tree appear to be lifting the curb, gutter, and portions of the street. There are several crossing branches grafted together in the upper canopy. All of the trees on site appear to be in need of routine maintenance that should include significant end weight reduction, large deadwood removal, and reshaping of the canopies. Special attention should be focused on the canopies of trees #3, #4, #7, and #9. Tree #3 needs significant end weight reduction over the home to reduce the chance of future failures occurring. Trees #4, #8, and #9 all overhang the street. The lateral limbs of these trees have poor branch taper and an abundance of excess end weight. Due to vehicle and pedestrian traffic, there is a higher potential for significant injury or damage to occurring in the event of a failure. I recommend the removal of trees #1, #5, and #7 as they all have poor form and vigor. All tree work performed as a result of this report should be completed by a qualified licensed tree care professional. Plan Review On August 4, 2014, I reviewed the proposed construction plans for the above site. The plans call for the removal of the existing home and the new construction and partial reconstruction of a historical building from a different site. Pruning and the removal of several trees will be needed to accommodate the new home and driveway. Trees #2, #3, #8, and #9 will need end weight reduction and select limb removal to allow the construction project to continue unhindered. Trees #5, #6, and #7 will need to be removed. 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS August11,2014 1. A protective barrier of 6-foot chain link fencing shall be installed around the dripline of protected tree(s). The fencing can be moved within the dripline if authorized by the Project Arborist or the City Arborist, but not closer than 2 feet from the trunk of any tree. Fence posts shall be 1.5 inches in diameter and are to be driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10 feet. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). I have drawn in on the provided site ptan the approximate location of the tree protection fencing. 2. Movable barriers of chain link fencing secured to cement blocks can be substituted for "fixed" fencing if the Project Arborist and City Arborist agree that the fencing will have to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction. The builder may not move the fence without authorization from the Project Arborist or City Arborist. 3. Avoid the following conditions. DO NOT: a. Allow runoff or spillage of damaging materials into the area below any tree canopy. b. Store materials, stockpile soil, or park or drive vehicles within the TPZ. c. Cut, break, skin, or bruise roots, branches, or trunks without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. d. Allow fires under and adjacent to trees. e. Discharge exhaust into foliage. f. Secure cable, chain, or rope to trees or shrubs. g. Trench, dig, or otherwise excavate within the dripline or TPZ of the tree(s) without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. h. Apply soil sterilants under pavement near existing trees. 4. Only excavation by hand or compressed air shall be allowed within the driplines of trees. Machine trenching shal� not be allowed. 5. Avoid injury to tree roots. When a ditching machine, which is being used outside of the dripline of trees, encounters roots smaller than 2 inches, the wall of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be hand trimmed, making clear, clean cuts through the roots. All damaged, torn, and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges, which promote decay. Trenches shall be filled within 24 hours, but, where this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be kept shaded with four layers of dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet. Roots 2 inches or larger, when encountered, shall be reported immediately to the Project Arborist, who will decide whether the Contractor may cut the root as mentioned above or shall excavate by hand or with compressed air under the root. The root is to be protected with dampened burlap. 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame 6 August 11, 2014 6. Route pipes outside of the area that is 10 times the diameter of a protected tree to avoid conflict with roots. 7. Where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the contractor shall bore beneath the dripline of the tree. The boring shall take place not less than 3 feet below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering "feeder" roots. 8. Any damage due to construction activities shall be reported to the Project Arborist or City Arborist within six hours so that remedial action can be taken. 9. Violation of any of the above provisions may result in sanctions or other disciplinary action. I believe this practices. If Sincerely, t is accurate and based on sound arboricultural principles and be of further assistance, please contact me at my office. A. �omey A.Ungalls Certified Arborist WE #7076A JAl:pmd OF r No. WE 7076A � y m �t �*�� , �\�'�, � "'�T/FlED �aF �;�- 524 Oak Grove Ave., Burlingame 7 August 11, 2014 \� � . � � ' ,� ., ..+s�.c �� -_- - 1 — � y ��. `_ � ., 6 � ;-- -- ,! �: � ��, � � Fas 1 a��ba ;� 's�l� °�� :-_-:=--�26�P :.: H+i3l � � \ :�� \ -= k'`� �,g '; ' \ J - • ��, � � � � �' \ �� ?z� I � ` . �.� I � a � �,I � 1 � . � 'e� 9 . 'i 1 � , ��'� �6 9 tI a �. .bl ! �n P �is�w � �r ) �� 70 ryr — � � — — � a ex ' fI ^---�---' aQ� c •' ;.� � ;`b ��t�i � `� y S q( j6 i� . /�-� �� x \�� S T\ ayte� I �9 I � V _1` \ �� , :�t `l.�43 I '. � � =3.�.-_ ..__. ......__'\ .._ i �c� I 'y , �.. --..v � *r�'.: t \� �.y�� l � � � C �� \ � C �� g� i • � ' �' i � \% . . . • � � �. _ I�� __ _ _n' `� d �, �—J --- ��, - � °� �I - - --� - i-- � � � �� : -- - - — --- � � � : .�� --- ,sil bt ' �� QOD� '._...._:�.T__.'A .._. e y_ .. _ � � o i\ � \: \ '. � �I, 1 � _ - l � z � � r� i � b! ( :�` Y � ; _ -��--- , \ � Y� I �n'� � ie,� \ i�,.�F; s ;-' 5� __ \ I � I a � - - I J, . S \. � ' x 4_- . • . . _ ... ,._ F . -- � � • .PJi .'. _ ____... .�._'________._ . . ' � 3 --__ � wm�i ww� w Aw.w � i . '�� ; :� e� � � z� i � ' b' <o - - - � � _ , �� r �, �_ �� ,�—. � o� ?x � I�� w.e�. Wr . i t�"'�_ - m-"�--,,, ..� a.w�, � i _.''� f e^^. cxl _ /1 /f /� �I � ; � �� Ei � • W ��g�� I2Y� \ \ \ � � 1 ' F 'JQ UI1Dy�J CV�I� ��s� 2� � • � .� � J � .i� O � � w.�,.�,,,.�,,�,.,,,.r _,��.w,,�w �,.�.,,a,.,,,.�.�Mw..� �.��.,� Project Comments Date: To: From: November 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on-site, relocate an existing two-story house onto the subject property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 6-20-2014 will apply to this project. Reviewed b • Date: 11-17-2014 Project Comments Date: To: From: June 16, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on site and place an existing two-story historic house on the property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: June 16, 2014 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes. �As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1,1994. Details can be found at htt�•//wwwleginfo ca gov/pub/09-10/billJsen/sb 0401- 045 �sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http•//www enerq�ca qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. 4) The GreenPoints Checklist will no longer be required beginning July 1, 2014. Compliance with the Mandatory Measures of the 2013 California Green Building Code (CAL Green) is required. Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandafory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference which indicates where each Measure can be found on the plans. 5) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 6) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 10)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 11)Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a leqend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 12)When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. �15 Obtain a survey of the property lines. On the plans specify that the roof eaves at the garage will not project within two feet of the property line. ��Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per 2013 CBC §705.2. �ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls at the garage that are less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2013 CBC, Table 602) 99) ooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify fhe location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. �Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. �pecify the following on the plans: If, during the process of building relocation or reconstruction, fhe existing fireplace is demolished any new solid wood-burning device subsequently installed will meet all requirements as a U.S. EPA Phase ll certified wood-burning device. 22)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 23)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 24)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Pl�ing Commission action. _ . -- --._ Reviewed J Date: 6-20-2014 Joe yr, CBO 65 -558-7270 � Project Comments Date: To: From: December 23, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attomey (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on-site, relocate an e�asting finro-story house onto the subject property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: 1. No further oomments Reviewed by: BD Date: 12/30/14 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attomey (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on-site, relocate an e�asting two-story house onto the subject property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: 1. Tree Protection specification written by independent arborist must be included on Demolition Plan A2.1d. 2. Tree Protection must be in place during all phases of construction. 3. Follow independent arborist report for care and maintenance of all trees on site. 4. Water eff'iciency and irrigation plan ok. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 11/25/14 � Project Comments Date: To: From: June 16, 2014 0 Engineering Division (650) 55&-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attomey (650) 558-7244 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on site and place an existing two-story historic house on the property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: June 16, 2014 � Tree Protection plan required by independent arborist for City owned Stone Pines and private oaks on property. Specifically address any root issues that may occur during construction phase or landscape installation. 2. Oak trees need proper maintenance and t�imming by a qualified tree professional before project begins to ensure limbs are not damaged during construction. 3�. Monterey Pine Tree is diseased and in decline. Arborist report required to determme health and structure and determine possible hazards to public right- of-way now and in the future. 4. Olive tree in Ciiy planter strip has poor structure and may be removed as part of this project. 5. Proposed landscape plants are mostly drought tolerant sun loving species. These landscape plants may not be compatible with existing pines and oaks. 6. F�cisting City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 7. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Pr�tected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). /'�J- �^- �-�i 8. Irrigation plan needs to include irrigation in turf area; and type of bubblers or heads for landscape plants. 9. Checklist incomplete without signature of applicant. 10. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width of Planter Strip needs to be implemented. Reviewed by: �. Date: �i�� . OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST I certi that the s bject project meets the specified requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance. � U/3.,/I,� �� - 3 2014 c�o., r��o Date � Single Family ❑ Multi-Family O Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ Irrigation only ❑ Industrial ❑ Other: Applicant Name (print): Contact Phone #: ProjectSiteAddress: t"jZU� (�►d�,�'�i AVE, Project Area (sq.ft. or acre): ?�{p� � # of Units: # of Meters: � r'� �'' �;"��:� is G �} �; Total Landsca e Area s ft ��`�s i'`£' �� k�.� 3 �.��..x. . _,�_ t' �.. ,:.:� �� ,x_u�:� ; P ( q• �)� �:-� . . < <... � .�.<< __.. _ Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): �j� Non-Turf Irrigated Area (sq.ft.): j �1 Special Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.): N Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.): � Tu rf Non-Turf Hydrozones Muich Irrigation System Efficiency Irrigation System Design I Irrigation Time I Metering Swimming Poois / Spas Water Features Documentation Audit Less than 25% of the landscape area is �1 Yes '"'_-� turf ❑ No, See Water Budget All turf areas are > 8 feet wide �1 Yes �H All turf is planted on slopes < 25% � Yes �'] At least 80% of non-turf area is native � Yes �] or low water use plants ❑ No, See Water Budget Plants are grouped by Hydrozones � Yes �� At least 2-inches of mulch on exposed � Yes :'fl soil surfaces 70% ETo (100% ETo for SLAs) � Yes !�:;� INo overspray or runoff ❑ Yes '�.e System efficiency > 70% � Yes ;;0 Automatic, self-adjusting irrigation ❑ No, not required forTier 1 � controllers � Yes '`° Moisture sensor/rain sensor shutoffs � Yes k3 No sprayheads in < 8-ft wide area jZl Yes t.%f7 System only operates between 8 PM 6a Yes 'd and 10 AM Separate irrigation meter �l No, not required because < 5,000 sq.ft. ��i"';e i�; ❑ Yes ,�;;:;: Cover highly recommended � Yes r� , .� ❑ No, not required j``.�; Recirculating ❑ Yes :�0 Less than 10% of landscape area ❑ Yes ;� Checklist �• Yes ';'� Landscape and Irrigation Design Plan �1 Prepared by applicant � ❑ Prepared by professional Water Budget (optional) ❑ Prepared by applicant ;;;� ❑ Prepared by professional Post-installation audit completed � Completed by applicant � ❑ Completed by professional �;. : .� ,��.. � . c: � ! '> ..� ,.�• . • � . • . .. OUTDOOR WATER USE EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST e :- • • -• � 1• . Auditor. � � � � , . � , , � �,. 7 �" i ,� � � � y�� + ' � .� ��:• ��X��..��-��.�„��.... ' ,�� ..��,." Materials Received and Reviewed: ❑ Water Conservation in Landscaping Ordinance Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checklist ❑ Outdoor Water Use Efficiency Checkiist �Water Budget ❑ Water Budget Calculation Worksheets �andscape Plan ❑ Plant List ❑ Post-Installation Audit ❑ Other: Date Reviewed: � ��t� , ��-��C�� '��;��t�' ,�., �a;�:;:; , i � `' ❑ Follow up required (explain): ❑ Drip irrigation ❑ Self-adjusting Irrigation Controller Date Resubmitted: ❑ Plant palate Date Approved: ❑ Three (3) inches of mulch Dedicated Irrigation Meter Required: ❑ Soii amendment (e.g., compost) Meter sizing: ❑ Grading ❑ Pool and/or spa cover � Dedicated irrigation meter ❑ Other: Comments: Selected Definitions: Tier 1 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas between 1,000 and 2,500 square feet requiring a buiiding or landscape permit, plan check or design review, or new or expanded water service. Tier 2 New construction and rehabilitated landscapes with irrigated landscape areas greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review. ETo Reference evapotranspiration means the quantity of water evaporated from a large field of four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration is used as the basis of estimating water budgets so that regional differences in climate can be accommodated. SLA Special Landscaped Area. Includes edible plants, areas irrigated with recycled water, surface water features using recycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface. Professional Professional is a"certified professionai" or "authorized professional" that is a certified irrigation designer, a certified landscape irrigation auditor, a licensed landscape architect, a licensed landscape contractor, a licensed professional engineer, or any other person authorized by the state to design a landscape, an irrigation system, or authorized to complete a water budget, irrigation survey or irrigation audit. Water Feature A design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming pools (where water is artificially supplied). Project Comments Date: To: From: June 16, 2014 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on site and place an existing two-story historic house on the property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: June 16, 2014 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding potential relocation of sidewalk area for new street trees in the planter strip. Reviewed by: V V Date: 7/18/2014 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION R PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS � S�L � � Project Name: � r,.� Project Address: , The following requirements apply to the project 1 �_ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey sha11 show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building pernut issuance.) �t,yZ V��' ti,�(,� �.!'.� �� / �-}}�3 LtG�;��.k�,� f��D ��. 2 � The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A,,�'�anitary sewer lateral��is re� qu'�u�ed for the project in accordance with the City's standards. 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the proj ect. 9. Submit a tr�c impact study for the project. T'he traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map sha11 show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc .' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject pazcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominiuxn map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 _� The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project sha11, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Pernut and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 `�5 The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the proj ect is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc �' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning azea shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLAI�INING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Project Comments Date: To: From: June 16, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on and place an existing finro-story historic house on the property build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: June 16, 2014 site and R-1, Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � - Date: �� _/� Project Comments Date: To: From: June 16, 2014 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review to demolish the existing house on site and place an existing two-story historic house on the property and build a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-083-010 Staff Review: June 16, 2014 1) The Stormwater Requirements Checklist has been filled out and returned. It indicates that the project does trigger the new stormwater requirements. The Checklist indicates that the project proposes to satisfy the requirements by utilizing site design measures B.2.b,c,d,e, and h. Please provide instructions on building plans as to these design measures and details as appropriate, i.e. pervious paving. 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs .pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727. Reviewed by: SD j� Date: 6/19/2014 � S,iN MATEO i:OUNTYVJIDE W'ater Fy.".ation Prevention Program ' �tormwater Checklist for Small Projects Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083 NPDES No. CAS612008 City of Buriingame - Office of Environmental Compliance 7103 Airport Bivd Office: (650) 342-3727 Fax: (650) 342-3712 Complete this form for individual single family home projects of any size, other projects that create and/or replace less than 10, 000 square feet of impervious surface, and projecfs in the following categories that create and/or replace less than 5,000 square feet of � n. � , • � r �' f`�'-:. impervious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities , and parfcing lots (stand-alone mor p�a�t of anof�er �.., r use). � - � ` :,., � a Rs._a.a F` o-..R .�er• d :� Fa�. ' A. Project Information A.1 Project Name: Addition and Remodel, 524 Oak Grove Ave. JU��! 1 ; ?Oi4 q.2 Project Address: 524 Oak Grove Ave, Burlingame, CA 94010 ��;-�,� C;'= ;�:�.CT:'._i��:�,!�9E A.3 Project APN: i1�•.;%_ `"[-a�-1V`ri'�IiV� iii�� B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures 6.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface2? � Yes ❑ No ➢ If yes, and fhe project will receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project must include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at http://www.flowsfobay.org/bs new developmenf.php#flyers. ➢ If no, or the project will receive final discretionary approval before Decem6er 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to implement site design measures4, which may be required at municipality discretion. Consult with municipal staff about requirements for your project. B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plans? 029-083-010 a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. Plan Yes No Sheet No. ❑ �- �- ❑ �- ❑ � � c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. � � � � N ❑ ❑ � ' � , ❑ �/ - f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. g. Minimize land disturbance and impervious surFace (especially parking lots). h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space. i. Use micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention. d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. j. Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. _ k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) � � � � �� - �� - ► - m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance) � See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here. Z Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individual single family home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if it is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surFace. 3 See MRP Provision C.3.i. 4 See MRP Provision C.3.a.i.(6). I. Self-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance) 1 Approved December 4, 2012 Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects ' C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; may be required at municipal discretion. Consult municipal staff.5j , Are these Features that features in require source project? control measures Yes No ❑ ❑ Storm Drain ❑ ❑ Floor Drains ❑ ❑ Parking garage [� ❑ Landscaping � � Pool/Spa/Fountain ❑ ❑ Food Service Equipment (non- residential) ❑ ❑ Refuse Areas ��■ ��■ uL�' ■�� Outdoor Process Activities � Outdoor EquipmenU Materials Storage VehiGe/ Equipment Cleaning Vehicle/ Equipment Repair and Maintenance ❑ I ❑ I Fuel Dispensing Areas ❑ � ❑ � Loading Docks ❑ � ❑ � Fire Sprinklers Source control measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) ■ Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. ■ Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.s ■ Retain existing vegetation as practicable. ■ Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. ■ Use efficient irrigation system; design to minimize runoff. - Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.s Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge 6 ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. ■ Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc., designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff. ■ Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.� • PerForm process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanitary sewer.s ■ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area only on paved and contained areas. ■ Roof storage areas that will contain non-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary sewers, and contain by berms or similar. ■ Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff, plumb to the sanitary sewers, and sign as a designated wash area. • Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Designate repaidmaintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do not install drains in the secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. s • Connect containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 ■ Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. ■ Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain away from fueling area. ■ Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. ■ Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area. ■ Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewer.6 ■ Install door skirts between the trailers and the building. • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers ❑ ❑ Miscellaneous ■ Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air Drain or Wash conditioning units may conneet to the sanitary sewer.s Water ■ Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable. ■ Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers. ❑ ❑ Architectural ■ Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewer s, or collect and Copper dispose properly offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." 5 See MRP Provision 2 Is source control measure included in project plans? Plan Yes No Sheet No. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �.11'�f ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ �Q� ■ ■ . ■ ■ �� '■ ■ ■ ■ , ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ► •+ �- e� �_ � ►I . Approved December 4, 2012 ' Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required forall projecfs.) S� ' D.1 Is the site a"High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this determination; if the answeris yes, Yes ❑ No � the project will be referred to constrvction site inspection staff for monthly stormwater inspections during the wet season, October 1 through April 30.) ■"High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2). D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No Best Manaqement Practice (BM � ❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet. �- ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. ❑ [� Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees, and drainage courses. [� ❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the fol�owing: ■ Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; ■ Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material; • Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization; ■ Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation. C� ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather. � ❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering and obtain all necessary permits. � ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. � � Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc. � ❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). G� ❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate. �1 ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points. [,�] ❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. C�i] ❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contact with stormwater. E�1 ❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs. ,�j � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of applicant completing the form: Richard Terrones Signature: ��1 / ��\ Date: � � E. Comments (for municipal staff use only): F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only): Section A Notes: 6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system is subject to sanitary district approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/equipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities. 3 Approved December 4, 2012 Sformwater Checklist for Small Projects Section B Section C Notes: Section D Notes: . Approved December4, 2012 �"� ".Y., �-� SAN MATED COUNTYVIIDE Water Poilution Prevention Program Clean Water. Healthy Community. �onstruction �est 1Vlanagem.ent Praciices �MPs � ) Construction projects are required to implement the storm�vater best management practices (BMP) on this page, as they apply to your project, all year long. A•Iaterials & Vlaste Atanagement �.�'orvHazardouf Malcri:�ls ❑ Bemi and eocer stotkpiles of w�, Airt or other cunsmKtim� matuial �cith cups wlxn min is 4xmas� or If nat oairely bcing uud wi�hin I4 dars. ❑ Ux (bm don'1 o�erusc� rccliimcd wmcr 1'or dus� connol. flamrduus M1�tatcrixlx ❑ Label nll hmmdais mmerials and harnrdovs �ras�es (such as peseitidcs, painls. ihimiers, sol.cntx fi�et. uil, oud amil'rceze) in eccrndanct. �ci�h cin�. connly, staic and fcdcral rcgnlalions. ❑ Stom ha �rdous materials anA �cnsics in woicr iight conlaincrs. cbm in nppmpriaie secondaq� conL inment. mid co�cr them ot the end o( evcry xorA day or during �eel x•cather or nhcn nin is forecas�. ❑ Follrnv manufacturcr's applicntion inswnions for hamrdous matcrinls and bc uveful no� ro um morc �hen nc.,rssnn�. Do not a�Dh� eh��n¢als outdoors w�hrn nin �s f ecas� .ri�hm J z i,��rs ❑ Arrange for approprnte di�wsal o(all hainrdous ��aslec \i'aac Mansgcmcnl O Coea wascc di�po<n1 eomainers scairelr o�i�h inrps ai Ihe cnd of a•cn� worl; dar nnd during �vet �ceadicr. ❑ Chcck n�nslc disposal comaincrs frequcntic fcx kaks anA �o make sive thep are nut orcrfilleA. Ncvcr hou do�cn a dumpucr on ihe construction siic. O Clrnn or mplau ponablc toilcis. and in<�a thcm frcqucndv fur �41�i5 Yltd Sp��9. ❑ Dis}wse of all aasics and dcMis propedy. Rccpdc mmcrials and a�astes Ihat can be �aycled (suth as xspM1alt concre�e. aggmgow bnsc maicrialx �cood. y,n�p board, pipc. ctc.l ❑ Disposc ef liquid residucs from pnin�s. d�immrs. solvems, gluec and cicaning tluids et hazardous �rnstc. Cunstructian Entrancee anA Pc�mr�cr O Establish and maintain cffeclivc perimelcr rnntmis and s�abilize all u+nsrnKtan entnn;.ez and a<io �o suRci�nil�� contml crotion nnd scdimcnt dischnrga from site and vackin� oRsi�c. ❑ Sweep onncuum any svect Irncking immediately nnd securc scdimcnl sourcc lo pre.xnl fuqher hacking. Ncvar hose do.��n sirec�s lo clean up tracking. Equipmcnt �lanagement & Spill Control ��' K t#+�,�r � �' . 4 � �#�� ?a�� t.-:"`� Maintenancc:mJ Purl:ing ❑ Dcsigwtc an nrca. fincd n•i�h oppropriate B,LfPs, fw rchicic anA cmiipmcm parL:ing and stxagc. ❑ Pcrfomi major maintenantt, repairjobs, and achicle and equipincnl rvashing olf siit. ❑ lf¢Poclingon�chickmaintcnanccmuslMdonc onsitc, n�ork in e Mmud arca owov from sromi drains and mror a drip pan big enoagh m collect Iluids. Rec}�cle or dispose of Ilnids as luzardouz w�aste. ❑ 11 cehide or equipment cleaning must be done onsile. duyn.ri�h nalcr onle in n bcnncd arca U�at o�ill net allon� rinse �.m..Y m mn inro guucrs, s�rceu, nonn drains. or n� �e wircrs. O Do not dcan rchidc or cquipmcm onsite using soaps, solccros. degrcnsen, stwm cicaning equipmrnl, e[c. s��u rh.��n�,� ;��a c��«oi ❑ Kcep spill cicanup malennls (ngs, a6sorbent5, etc.) a��ailable a� rhe construcrian site ae alI times. ❑ Inspect �ehidea nnd equipmem freqnrndp Pm nnd rcpair Icaks pmmpdv. Uu drip pans ro ca�ch Inks umil rcpnirs nre mad. ❑ Clean up spills er Icaks immeAiatch� and disposc of cicanup mstcrials pmpcdy. ❑ Do no� Irosc dmai snrfaces ��hcrc Onids havc spillcd. Use dn� cleannp methals labsorbent m;rcuials. wt litter. and.'or rnosl. Q S�veep up spilled dn� mxterial5 immediateht Do �rot tn �o ��ash tlxm mrae with �ru�cr, or b�vy ILem. '� Clean up spills nn din areas bY digeing up and pmpedy disposing of contaminared soil. ❑ ReportsiSiufitanlspillsimmcdiately.Younrcrcqnired by Imr to rcpon oll si�nifiant mlcnue of hvardons mnterials. including oil. To report a spill: Il Dial911 or your laal emc ecncy reeponse mm�ber. 2) Catllhc Gmnmor's OITu of Emcrgrnq� Seniccs RSming Cemcr.1500) 932-7330 �'-0 hrnvs). Earth�vork& Pa��ing/Asphalt��'ork Contaminated Soils ��`��.�r-� 1� �y�'�� ` � :.�_ .' Yyt-�`+ '% +"`'.""� e�s...-u.::s'?3.� �2�"',�k1��—�`�f_�,w. , ..r.�.,,»„� -. -. Emsion Cauml ❑ Schcdulc gnding and cscarmion e�ork for dn• ncaUicr onk. ❑ Slabilix all dcnudcd arcaz, inslall and maimain tempordn� erosion controls (such es emsion conlml fnbric or 6onded film matn ) nntil vcgemiion iz esmblished ❑ S;cd or plam �ngetntimi fa erosion conlmi nn slnpcs m�chcm cons�nKtion is not immediatelv planned. Scdimcnt Contml ❑ Pro�¢I slonn dmin inlcls, guucrs, ditchcs. and dminagc ccx�rscs �vnh nppropriatc BMPs su:h . n: �a,dn,� fibv I 6 a, rol s b<mu, crc. O Prcvnn scdiment (rom m ��rating oRsite br insulling end nminlaining udimcnt cenlrols. such as fbcr mlls. sill fcnu-s, or xdinxnt basins. ❑ Keep excacated soil on Ihe site �che¢ i� �cill na wllc,;� inro tM1c strcet ❑ Transler eceacamd mnterinls �o dump ttucks an thc sitq not in the sUc,,t. ❑ ConlnminoredSoils ❑ lf am• of the (ollo�cing condirions are abscn�rA, trst for contaminarion mid contaq lhc Racional Walv Qualin ContrM Ba rd: ■ Llnusual soil coiulitions, discoloralion. or odor. ■ Abando�d underground tanks. ■ Abandoned wclls ■ Buricd bnrrcls, dc6ris. or vash. ❑ Avoid pacing and sral coaling in �rcc �reathcr. or whcn rain is forccasr bcfore Besh pmxment u�ill Iw�c time ro cure. ❑ Cocer siorm drnin inlcu nnd manholcs �.�hen applping seal coxt. uck coa�. slum xal. fog seal, cic. ❑ Collcct and rm�dc or eppropr'mrcly disposc of c�ccss obnsivc gre�cl or sand. Do NOT s�rrcp or �cash it inb gmicrs. ❑ Do nm uu waicr �o wash do�m frcch asph.il� -,oncmm pacrnunl. Sarccuttin� i� psphall/Concrctc Rrmnval ❑ Cample�elr co� er or barricade s�onn drain inl cts+vhen sa�v cuning Usc filtcr fabnc, carh basm inlct filmrs, or �nvel begs ro k¢p slurry� out of �Uc sonn Min syslcm. ❑ Shrncl, abasurb. or � acuum w�c-cm slurtp und dispose oCall nas�e as soon as you are finished in one location or at tlic rnd of each �vork da�� (icluchc�cr is scn�ncr!). ❑ If sa�ccut slum• cmcrs a catc6 basiv, cic�i i� up immcdialdp. Concretc, Crout & �iortar Application ❑ Smre concrcic graul and manar undcr cecer. on pallcts and a�car fmm drainagc nru,s. n�csc mamrials mus� ncccr rc,ch a siomi dnin. ❑ \Vash ow concrcic cquip�n.n�4mcks oftsi�c or in a eoniain�;d nrea. su �I�cre is no discliargc inlo Ihc nndcrh�in� cnil omo swrnundmg ar.as_ Lci concrc�c hnMrn and dispnu of as gar� gc. ❑ Collec� �Lc ��ash ��aicr from �rushing c.poscd aggreymc concreic and remnvc ii for approprimc dispasal offsiic. D cr�•atcri nb �.`�� ` �� [�� 1 : .� ,. 1 �'�'4 � I i.� `�..� � � ' �� -�, ❑ EIRai�al� inanagc all runon, nll runoR��ithin ihc siic. and all runo0'�ha� dis;.hargcs frmn ihc sii.. Dircrl runon o�ai<r from oR'site a��ac from all dismAxd arus or oJicnrisc rnsurc cnmpliancc. ❑ N9wn dcwa�crin„ natif � and obiain aPproval Gom �hc bcal municipaliir before discharginc �camr �o a sinxi euncr or siorm drain. Flhra�ion ar di��crsion �hrouFl� a 6asi�� tank. or scdimcm �np mac bc rr.�uircd. ❑ In areas nf A io�rn conmminaiion. msi ing is rcquircd pnor �o reusc or disclnrgc af gmund�ca�v. Cnnsuli w�i�h �hc Enginccr io d..icmiine ��hcihcr �cs�ing is ¢quimd and ha�� o imcrpmi n;suhs. Crnimminamd gmunAw�aier musi be rccamd or haulcd oQ-sitc fnr proper disposal. Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! Paintind Sc Paint Removal i � .,r '" .i � `` _ -_ �.��.�: �� `� �� r��F �i�.��i� ❑ Nac� ckan nnaucs o, dns� ptim ��,��<.s �� a t�,�� F�u��.:�o�n Anm. or surfact ��aicrs ❑ Fnr w�amr-0as.cd paims paim om brushes io J�e ex�cm possiblc. Rinsc io Ihc sani��n� uwcroncc pou La.c gaincd pum�ssion fmm �hc lowl �.�sic..a�.r �m.�uncm aminnn�. �c�tr pour paint dm� n a drain. ❑ For oi66axd a ims. p�im ow bnishcs m il�e c�ienl pnssiblc nnd elean �.�i�h thinnn solrem in a proper conuincr. Fihcr and rcuu U�inncrs and solvcnts. Disposc of esiduc �nd unusablc �liinner,iol.�cros ns hai:udous �.asia. Pnint rrm�n�al O Chrn�iwl paim svippinF resid�K ond �i,;�s ��a <i�� r,��,� m�� P��: o. pomu wnmining Icad or �rihut�� hin must lr� dispnscd of as hnzardaus �ras�c ❑ Pun� chi s��M dus� from � n o�a�,._, m«�s dn s�n pPing �nA mnd blacung inay Is s��cpi up or cnllcc�cd m pbzoc drop drnhs and dispnscd ofas imch. l.andscapc �latcrials �� `'�'., �.c �(', ./�" �'�i.�.;�'��.5.�1 ��,S t� �^Spy-'� ��a- `� -��T�� • u'• �'.:J� � t7,,w� i_:Y• � ' ❑ Coma�n sioclpikd Iandse�ping mntenals h�� si�ring Ihcm unAer �arp� �� hcn Uic�� nm na nui�xlr being uuA, ❑ S�xk crodihlc Io�ulcca�+c mo�crial w� pallc�s. Coccr or smrc �heu mmcnnls ..�Lcn ihep am no� aui��elr bcing uscd or np�li<d. O Dixcominn. applicaiion ofanp crodiblc land<capc maltrial �vi�hin ] Oars bcforc a forccaz� rain ecem or dunng �<c� �reaiher. � SAN {C,tTEQ COUN7YWlOE Water Pollution Prevention Program qeanW�te�. He�irt.y Cammunity. Requirements for Architectural Copper Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing! Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts, especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants. Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper. Building with copper flashing, gutter and drainpipe. Use Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited discharges to storm drains. During Installation • If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory. • If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs: o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain. Block off storm drain inlet if needed. o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before discharging to the sanitary sewer. o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for proper disposal. • Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring less maintenance. During Maintenance Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof, re-patination or re-application of impervious coating: • Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains. • Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal. Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself! If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non- stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine. Contact Information The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at www.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency"). FINAL February 29, 2012 Storm drain inlet is blocked to prevent prohibited discharge. The water must be pumped and disposed of properly. . CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 , PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 524 OAK GROVE AVENUE The (ity of Burlingame Planning [ommission annaunces the following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 23, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A: Application for Design Review and Front Setback Variance to demolish the existing house at 514 Oak Grove Avenue and replace it with an existing house to be moved from 1128 Douglas Avenue; the project includes a first and second story addition to the house moved from Douglas Avenue and construction of a new detached garage at 524 OAK GROVE AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 029-083-010 Mailed: March 13, 2015 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlinqame A copy of the applicatian and plans for this pco�ect may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Qevelopment Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,�'Califomia . , , , - If you challenge the subJect application(s) m court, ,�rou may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or 'rn written car�espondence deiivered;to the city at or prior to the public hearing. ; � • >. Property owners who ceceive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this "notice. ` i y For additional information; please ca1C,(650) 558 7250 Thank you. , Wlliam Meeker � - Community Development Director ' PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other srde) State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomia� NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date raye i �i i � Kesource name(s) or number(assigned by recorder) 1128 DOualas Avenue P1. Other ldentifier: James R. Murqhv Residence *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication �Unrestricted "a. County San Mateo *b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Mateo. Calif. Date 1999 `c. Address 1128 Douqlas Avenue City Burlinqame Zip 94010 'e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 029-132-180 'P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major eiements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) 1128 Douglas Avenue is a two-story over raised basement, single-family residence. It is designed in a vernacular style with Shingle-style influence, and is clad in wood shingle and capped with a side gable roof. The 2,382 sq. ft. building occupies an 8,100 sq. ft. lot on the north side of Douglas Avenue between California Drive and Primrose Road. The house was constructed in 1903. It was originally located at 1208 Burlingame Avenue, but was moved to its current location in 1914. The house is sited approximately 20 feet back from the front lot line, and slightly west of lot center to accommodate a driveway at the east perimeter of the lot. A four-unit apartment complex is located at the rear of the lot and abuts the rear of the main house. The primary fa�ade faces south on Douglas Avenue and is arranged in a largely symmetrical three-bay pattern. The exposed basement is clad in vertical T-111 siding at left, and the remainder of the fa�ade is clad in wood shingle. At center, a short concrete stair framed by low brick walls leads to an entry porch which spans the center and left bays. The primary entrance, a multi-lite glazed wood door, is located at left and is sheltered within the entry porch. The porch is supported by square posts clad in wood shingle, and is enclosed at its west edge by a multi-lite wood sash window. Additional fenestration within the entry porch includes a fixed six-lite wood sash window at center and a multi-lite glazed wood door surrounded by multi-lite casement sidelights and transom at right. The right bay consists of a 40-lite wood sash window (historic photographs reveal that this area was originally an open part of the porch). At the second story, a large central hipped dormer includes four double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs. The primary far�ade terminates with boxed eave overhangs at the roof and at the dormer. (continued) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2: Sinqle Familv Residence �P4. Resources Present: OBuilding ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) View of primary (south) facade 5/14/2013 "P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: �historic 1903. Assessor's Appraisal Report *P7. Owner and Address: Burlinqame Park LLC 8 Vista Lane Burlinpame. CA 94010 "P8. Recorded by: Paae & Turnbull. Inc. 1000 Sansome Street Suite 200 San Francisco CA 94111 "P9. Date Recorded: 05/14/2013 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive "P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey 'Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map OContinuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1195) *Required information DPR 523L �cN�� a��u �u�c� avwccs, ui eiuei nune � rvune State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 2 of 13 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 1128 Douglas Aven� *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. "Date May 2013 O Continuation ❑ Update The west fa�ade (Figure 2) is partially visible from the street and includes a brick chimney stack that extends the full height of the building and is capped by a contemporary aluminum vent. The exposed basement at this fa�ade includes four utility doors and vented windows. Fenestration at this facade includes the multi-lite porch window previously described, and double hung vinyl sash windows flanking the chimney at both the first and second stories. A two-story addition is visible at this fa�ade toward the rear of the house. The addition in built out from the volume of the house, clad in T-111 siding, and includes both double-hung and fixed wood sash windows at the first story and a small porch at the second story with aluminum sash windows and a glazed wood door. The west fa�ade terminates in a flush roofline, except for the second story porch at the rear addition, which terminates in a projecting flat roof. The east fa�ade (Figure 3) faces the driveway and is largely visible from the street. A concrete foundation is visible at the exposed basement. A brick chimney is located toward the rear of the fa�ade which extends beyond the roofline and is capped by a contemporary aluminum vent. First story fenestration at this fa�ade includes a multi-lite wood sash window at left, a shallow angled bay with double-hung wood sash windows at center, and three six-over-one double-hung wood sash windows at the rear. A one story shed roof addition with a fixed multi-lite window is located at the rear of the house. Fenestration at the second story includes five double hung windows (four wood, one vinyl). Ornamentation at the second story includes a raised molding which traces the line of the gable from the front fa�ade. The north (rear) fa�ade (Figure 4) partially abuts the apartment building at the rear of the lot. The first story of the north fa�ade includes a pedestrian entrance at the right, sheltered by a shed roof, and a one-story projecting section at left with a shed roof, and double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs. Two windows of the same configuration are located at the second story. The fa�ade terminates with a moderate eave overhang with exposed rafters. The four unit apartment complex located at the rear of the lot (Figure 5) was constructed in 1952. It is two stories tall, L-shaped in plan, clad in horizontal wood siding and capped with a shallow-pitched cross gable roof. The windows are wood sash. There are two large trees in the front yard of the property, one redwood and one oak, which may be associated with Jesse N. Murphy, wife the original owner. The house appears to be in good condition. Figure 2: 1128 Douglas Avenue, east facade. (Page 8� Turnbull, May 2013) DPR 523L Figure 1: 1128 Douglas Avenue, west facade. (Page & Turnbull, May 2013) State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomia� Page 3 of 13 Resource Name or #(Assigned by recorder) 1128 Douglas Avenue "Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. 'Date May 2013 � Continuation ❑ Update 'P3a. Description: (continued) �� ,� Figure 3: North (rear) facade, partial view. (Page & Turnbull, May 2013) Figure 5: Redwood and oak, front yard 1128 Douglas Avenue. (Page & Turnbull, May 2013.) UPR 523L Figure 4: Apartment behind subject property. (Page 8� Turnbull, May 2013) State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 4 of 13 *NRHP Status Code 3CS *Resource Name or # 1128 Doualas Avenue 61. Historic name: The James R. Murphv Residence 1208 Burlinaame Avenue Burlin4ame CA B2. Common name: 1128 Doualas Avenue B3. Original Use: Sinqle-Familv Residence B4. Present use: Multi-unit Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular (Shinqle-stvle influence) ' *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1128 Douglas Avenue was constructed in 1903 and was located at that time at 1208 Burlingame Avenue. The architect and builder are unknown. The house was moved in 1914 to its current location on Douglas Avenue. Additions and alterations with known permit dates include: reroofing (1977), fire repairs (1986), front and side yard fence (1994), and electric service and meter adjustments (1998). Additional alterations with unknown dates include enclosure of the right side of front porch (after 1916), reconfiguration of the primary entrance (after 1916), second story porch construction at west fa�ade (date unknown), and one story shed addition at the rear fagade (date unknown). *B7. Moved? ❑ No �Yes ❑Unknown Date: 1914 Original Location:1208 Burlinaame Ave.. Burlinqame. CA *B8. Related Features: Two-story apartment building at the rear of the lot (1952). B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme Association with earlv settlement Murphv familv Area Burlinqame Land Co. Subdivision Period of Significance Earlv settlement. 1885-1915: Murphv familv 1903-1940 Properly Type Residential Applicable Criteria 1. 2 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) Historic Context: Citv of Burlinqame The first known inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula were a linguistically and culturally diverse array of indigenous tribes known collectively as the Ohlone. The Ohlone lived in close relation with the tideland resources of the San Francisco Bay, in communities that the Spanish later termed rancherias -- small villages of unrelated family groups that collaborated in hunting, fishing, harvesting, and religious practices. Spanish settlement of the California coast began after 1770, and increased European presence on the San Francisco peninsula after the turn of the nineteenth century eventually led to a terminal decline in the area's once dense indigenous population. (See Continuation Sheet) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) n/a *B12. References: (See Page 9) 613. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Paqe & Turnbull. Inc. *Date of Evaluation: Mav 26. 2013 (This space reserved for official comments.) DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of Caiifornia — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 13 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. B10. Significance (cont'd): Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue *Date May 2013 � Continuation ❑ Update During the era of Spanish control of the San Francisco peninsula, today's Burlingame was utilized as farmland, worked primarily by Ohlone people under the purview of Mission San Francisco de Asis. After Mexican independence from Spain in 1821, the process of secularization of formerly Church-controlled land saw large grants of land made available for purchase to private Mexican citizens. The City of Burlingame was initially part of Rancho San Mateo, a Mexican-era land grant given by Governor Pio Pico to Cayetano Arena in 1845. Over the next four decades, the lands passed through the hands of several prominent San Francisco businessmen, including William Howard (1848) and William C. Ralston (1856). In 1866, Ralston sold over 1,000 acres to Anson Burlingame, the US Minister to China. Following Burlingame's death in 1870, however, the land reverted to Ralston, and eventually to Ralston's business partner, William Sharon. Very little formal development occurred during this period, with most of the land used for dairy and stock farm operations. In 1893, William Sharon's trustee, Francis G. Newlands, proposed the development of the Burlingame Country Club as an exclusive semi-rustic destination for wealthy San Franciscans. A railroad depot was constructed in 1894, concurrent with small- scale subdivisions in the vicinity of Burlingame Avenue. During this time, EI Camino Real acted as a de facto dividing line between large country estates to the west and the small village of Burlingame to the east. The latter developed almost exclusively to serve the needs of the wealthy estate owners. Burlingame began to develop in earnest with the arrival of an electric streetcar line between San Mateo and San Francisco in 1903. However, the 1906 Earthquake had a far more dramatic impact on the area. Hundreds of San Franciscans who had lost their homes began relocating to Burlingame, which flourished after the disaster with the construction of new residences and businesses. Over the next two years, the village's population grew from 200 to 1,000. In 1908, Burlingame incorporated as a city, and in 1910 annexed the adjacent town of Easton to the north. The following year, the Burlingame Country Club area was also annexed to the City. By 1920, Burlingame's population had increased to 4,107. Burlinqame Land Comnanv The Burlingame Land Company was located north of Burlingame Avenue on land now bounded by Bellevue Avenue at the south, Oak Grove Avenue at the north, EI Camino Real at the west, and California Drive at the east. The land was originally part of 440 acres owned by William Corbitt, a wealthy Scottish coffee merchant who acquired his land in the early 1870s and was one of the area's first full-time residents.' After Corbitt's death in 1898, the land was purchased by F. M. Moody and James Newlands Jr. (nephew of Burlingame landowner Francis Newlands). The land was subdivided in 1905 by civil engineer Davenport Bromfield and marketed by the real estate firm of Lyon and Hoag (Figures 7& 8). Promotional materials describe the availability of 184 lots with water connections already established for every lot. Building covenants enforced a 25' setback for all properties to ensure a uniformly bucolic feeling. Settlement of the Burlingame Land Co. subdivision was strongly afFected by its location. Although Southern Pacific had established railroad service to Burlingame as early as 1894, transportation between Burlingame and San Francisco improved in frequency and reliability in 1903, when the United Railway Company began to operate electric streetcar service between San Francisco and San Mateo down California Avenue, the eastern perimeter of the Burlingame Land Co. area. Proximity to this convenient service made lots in the new subdivision attractive to buyers. Additionally, the subdivision was located directly north of Burlingame Avenue, one of the earliest settled streets in the town and the site of many town founders' homes. By 1910, however, Burlingame Avenue had become increasingly commercial, and the owners of these homes sought new locations for their homes. The Burlingame Land Co.'s physical proximity to Burlingame Avenue made it a logical choice for these moved homes. Three homes associated with the town's earliest residents, city clerk James Murphy, Dr. A. L. Offield, and train stationmaster George Gates, were moved in the 1910s from their original location on Burlingame Avenue to lots within the Burlingame Land Co. subdivision. These houses were moved to 1128 Douglas Avenue, 1124 Douglas Avenue (1904), and 1214 Donnelly Street (1903), respective� and are all extant at the time of this report, though all three buildings and their immediate settings have been altered to an extent. 1128 Douqlas Avenue The residence at 1128 Douglas Avenue was constructed in 1903 for Mr. and Mrs. James R. Murphy (Figure 9). The house was originally located at 1206 Burlingame Avenue and stood there for ten years before the increasingly commercial nature of the street compelled the Murphys to move their home to its current location in 1914 (Figures 10 & 11). The Murphy family was one of the '"History of Burlingame", Vinther Properties website, httq://www.vintheroronerties.com/Burlinqame Citv Facts htm. Z Joanne Garrison, Burlingame Centennial, 1908-2008, (Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 2007). DPR 523L SUte of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 13 'Recorded by Page 8 Turnbull, Inc. Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue *Date May 2013 O Continuation ❑ Update earliest to settle in Burlingame; according to family history, the Murphy house was the seventh constructed in the unincorporated town. 3 James Russell Murphy was born in Redwood City in 1871, the son of Jeremiah and Catherine Murphy. His father was a native of Ireland who came to California in 1862 and worked as a foreman on the San Francisco-San Jose rail line. James R. Murphy attended Redwood City High School and worked afterward as a telegraph operator for Southern Pacific. In 1895, Murphy married Jessie E. Nichols. daughter of Benjamin Nichols, a lumber baron and early settler of Santa Cruz, California. By 1900, the Murphys were living in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County that would become Burlingame. Murphy worked as a station agent in Millbrae and Burlingame. By 1910, the Murphys were living in their newly-constructed home on Burlingame Avenue, and James Murphy was employed as the Burlingame City Clerk, in addition to his continued duties as Burlingame station master and as the agent of an express company he had founded, Murphy's Transfer. There were three Murphy children by 1910, including Justina (12), Russell (8) and Robert (5). Murphy retained the post of City Clerk for the next 30 years, until his death in 1940. According to his obituary, during those 30 years, he also served in a temporary capacity at every city job with the single exception of city attorney, including as an interim mayor.' Murphy was active in club life, including establishment of the local Elks chapter, as well as civic promotion, including participation in the League of California Cities. Jessie Murphy was civically active as well, and served as one of the area's first park commissioners. Her lifelong commitment to the planting of trees, specifically redwood trees, was said to be an attempt to right some of the damage her lumber baron father had wrought on the area's landscape (Figure 12).5 The redwood tree in front of the house at 1128 Douglas Avenue is very likely associated with Jessie Murphy's tree advocacy. For several years in the early 1920s, former Burlingame mayor Gustav MacGregor lived at 1128 Douglas Street with the Murphys. During his tenure as mayor (1912- 1913), Macgregor had been active in the drafting and implementation of tree ordinances in Burlingame, which likely spurred his friendship with Jessie Murphy. The tree ordinances implemented by MacGregor continue to contribute to Burlingame's enduring legacy as a city of trees. At the time of his death in July 1940, James Murphy was regarded as a beloved San Mateo County official, and his casket was carried by Burlingame mayor Edward McDonald and various members of city and county council. Jessie Murphy continued to reside at the house on Douglas Avenue after her husband's death, and oversaw the construction of the apartment buildings at the rear of the family lot in 1951 (Figures 13 8� 14). After her death ca. 1960, ownership of the property passed to the Murphy children, Justina and Robert. The home was occupied by Justina Murphy in 1970. In 1985, Robert Murphy sold the property to Elizabeth Stevenson. Stevenson and her husband Larry owned the property through the 1990s. In 2005 the property was owned by Denham LLC. The date of transfer to current ownership occurred on March 28, 2013. Evaluation (Siqnificancel: 1128 Douglas Avenue is not currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The building does not appear in the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), indicating that no record of previous survey or evaluation is on file with the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The City of Burlingame does not currently have a register of historic properties, and therefore the property is not listed locally. In February 2008, the City of Burlingame engaged Carey & Co. Inc. to complete an inventory of historic resources for the Downtown Specific Plan Area. The purpose of this inventory was to identify properties that appeared eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources and/or the National Register of Historic Places. The inventory included 1128 Douglas Avenue as one of 23 structures that Carey 8 Co. found would qualify as historic resources for the City of Burlingame and appeared eligible for the California and the National Registers. No register nomination action was taken in response to these 2008 findings. This evaluation finds that 1128 Douglas Avenue does not appear to meet the threshold for national significance within the local, state, or national context such that it would be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under any criterion. Criterion 1 (Events) 1128 Douglas Avenue appears to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 1(Events) for its association with early settlement patterns in the town of Burlingame. The period of significance for this context is 1885-1915. Constructed in 1903, the house is one of the very oldest extant residential structures in Burlingame, the seventh constructed in the town according to owner family recollection. It was originally located at 1206 Burlingame Avenue, which was where many of the town's earliest middle-class and upper-class families built their homes. The subdivision of the Burlingame Land Co.'s property in 1905, directly to the north of Burlingame Avenue, as well as the increasingly commercial nature of Burlingame Avenue after 1910, ' Historic property files. Burlingame Historical Society. `"Jim Murphy, Loved Burlingame Official for 30 Years, Dies," San Mateo County Times (1 July 1940) 1. 5 Murphy family file, Burlingame Historical Society. DPR 523L State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial rage i or is Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. "Date May 2013 O Continuation ❑ Update combined to motivate the Murphy family and other homeowners on Burlingame Avenue to relocate their homes. Relocation does not negatively affect this property's eligibility for register inclusion because it was undertaken nearly 100 years ago and undertaken as part of a local development trend for property owners around the same time. Thus, the move itself was associated with a significant aspect of physical development for the city. Additional extant residential structures that were moved from Burlingame Avenue to the Burlingame Land Co. subdivision are rare and include the Dr. A. L. Offield, house (1124 Douglas Avenue) and the George Gates house (1214 Donnell Street) Because the property was one of the first residences constructed in Burlingame and exemplifies an important pattern of development in Burlingame, the property at 1128 Douglas Avenue appears be individually significant for its association with early settlement, and is therefore eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 1 (Events). Criterion 2 (Persons) 1128 Douglas Avenue also appears to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 2(Persons) due to its association with James R. and Jessie N. Murphy. The period of significance for this association is 1903-1940, the period in which both Murphys were alive, contributing actively to the city, and living in the house. James R. Murphy was living in the Burlingame area by 1900 and serving as the town's station master. By 1910 he was counry clerk, a position he retained through to his death in 1940. His contributions to Burlingame government and civic life were varied and well documented, and he died a beloved town son in 1940. Jessie Murphy was also active in Burlingame government and civic life, serving as park commissioner and acting as a lifelong advocate for trees, a subject integral to Burlingame's civic identity as the "City of Trees." Both James and Jessie Murphy lived the majority of their lives in their house in Burlingame and raised three children there. The Murphys' role in the development of Burlingame as well as their long association with the property meet the threshold for significance for listing in the listing in the California Register under Criterion 2(Persons). Criterion 3 (Architecturel 1128 Douglas Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 3(Architecture) because the building does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. The building is vernacular in style and displays little in the way of distinctive features or detailing. The architect and builder are unknown and thus cannot be considered masters in this evaluation. Therefore, the property is not individually significant for its architectural merit and does not appear eligible for register inclusion under Criterion C/3. Criterion 4 (Information Potential) This property was not assessed for its potential to yield information important in prehistory or history, per National Register and California Register Criterion D/4 (Information Potential). This Criterion is typically reserved for archeological resources. The analysis of the house at 1128 Douglas Avenue for eligibility under California Register Criterion 4(Information Potential) is beyond the scope of this report. Evaluation (Intes�ritv): 1128 Douglas Avenue was constructed in 1903 at 1206 Burlingame Avenue and was moved to its current location in 1914. The building retains integrity of location because its tenure at its original location was 11 years, and its tenure at its current location has been 99 years. Integrity of setting is fair because the surrounding residential neighborhood has shifted from an area characterized by single family homes to one that is increasingly characterized by larger multi-unit apartment buildings and condominiums. However, a few other homes from this era of early settlement are extant in the area, including 1124 Douglas Avenue (the Dr. A. L. Offield house), 1214 Donnelly Avenue (the George W. Gates house), and 1132 Douglas Avenue (the Everett J. Savill house), which bolsters integrity of setting. With regard to integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, integrity in relation to the Early Settlement period of significance (1895-1915) has been somewhat compromised due to alterations to the primary fa�ade, including the enclosure of part of the front porch and the reconfiguration of openings at the primary facade. However, careful examination of historic photographs indicates that between 1905 and 1916, the western facade of the front porch was enclosed by multi-lite windows, and a multi-lite window or multi-lite doors was located at the eastern portion of the porch (Figure 9 8 11). Although the date of the enclosure of the eastern portion of the porch is unknown, photographs taken ca. 1920 of the Murphys on their front porch show the north fa�ade of the front porch enclosed, and the multi-lite doors at the northern portion of the porch in place (Figure 12). Visual inspection of the porch enclosure, which includes a multi-lite wood sash door, sidelights, and transom windows, places the enclosure prior to 1940. The date of fenestration changes at the remainder of the porch are unknown, but the door at the south and the central window are both wood multi-lite, and appear to match in configuration the doors at the northern part of the porch. Therefore, integrity of design, materials and workmanship in relation to the association with the Murphy Family period of significance (1903-1940) remains high because the majority of porch and fenestration changes appear to have taken place during this period. Larger alterations to the rear are not easily visible from the street and do not compromise overall integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. 1138 Douglas Avenue retains integriry of feeling and association because the house retains its original use as a residence. The redwood tree at the front of the property, very likely planted by Jessie Murphy, confirms the property's association with the Murphy family. UPR 523L State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial rage u ot i,s 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue 'Date May 2013 � Continuation O Update Overall, integrity is sufficient to convey the property's significance in association with early Burlingame development and James and Jessie Murphy. Conclusion 1128 Douglas Avenue appears to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criteria 1 and 2. The California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC) of "3CS" has been assigned to the property, meaning that it was "found eligible for California Register as an individual property through survey evaluation." This conclusion does not address whether the building would qualify as a contributor to a potential historic district. A cursory inspection of the surrounding area reveals a moderate concentration of early twentieth-century residences that warrant further study. Additional research and evaluation of the Burlingame Land Co. subdivision as a whole would need to be done to verify the neighborhood's eligibility as a historic district. DPR 523L State of Califomia —The Resources Agency Pnmary # ' DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial rage y ot � 3 Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc "Date May 2013 O Continuation ❑ Update '612. References: - Brechin, Gray. Imperial San Francisco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999. - Building Permit Records, 1128 Douglas Avenue, Burlingame, CA - Burlingame City Directories. - Burlingame Historical Society files. - Burlingame Planning Department, Property file: 1128 Douglas Avenue. - Burlingame Property Owner Cards, Burlingame Historical Society. - Carey & Company. "Draft Inventory of Historic Resources: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan." February 19, 2008. - Condon-Wirgler, Diane. "Burlingame Park, Burlingame Heights, Glenwood Park." Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, ca. 2004. - Evans, Beverley L., ed. Burlingame: Lively Memories- a Pictorial View. Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 1977. - Garrison, Joanne Burlingame: Centennial 1908-2008. Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 2007. -"Jim Murphy, Loved Burlingame Official for 30 Years, Dies," San Mateo County Times (1 July 1940) 1. - McAlester, Virginia & Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003. - Online Archive of California, "Loomis (Francis B.) Papers." - Parcel History, San Mateo County Hall of Records, Redwood City. -"Preliminary Historic Resources Inventory: City of Burlingame." July 26, 1982. - United States Federal Census records: 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930. - San Mateo County Assessor Records. - Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps: 1921, 1949. UPR 523L State of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 10 of 13 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Historic Maps and Photographs: Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue *Date May 2013 � Continuation ❑ Update �{iai�-.:_c,�c n�.�•,- „r u��,n.i.�;.>>�i.. a.,. ��.�•r�;o �.�,i�.�r,�. ,�.��.�ru:;.,.� Figure 7: Illustration of Burlingame Land Co. subdivision, ca. 1905, from Lyon & Hoag promotional brochure. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. \I.V'\u2 THE BURLINGAME LANO C0. � - � -• -__.... _ .�,,� o�-� T �.. ,� , ....� .�� q.v+A '�� , . . � �` _ �. �y 1, " .+ �, � ev"" E � Yi ti ,., . - ,.: ... � . �` � • � � f�.� �2 � .'C `� �• � �; :. ` ` _ � 4�.,�. f �. �� / �' ,._ _ _ Y. � i`� ; � . ,., ,��,•. . � `".r"._,_„_ � �,,. � ,�.` �"� '��'''�'9''��j. , \ � R � y Y Iy .. .�� p,H�...�'. -r. �� ' - "" Mla��j.\;�.., (7 .. _-`\��\i.� ... . .�� l . �c�ih.�l' � .. ,. .w \ \ �1 , l � Figure 8: Burlingame Land Co. Subdivision Map, 1905. Subject property located on what was originally a larger lot, highlighted; map edited by author. DPR 523L State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 11 of 13 `Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue 'Date May 2013 0 Continuation ❑ Update i� '� s � � � 4"�1��,�?i ,, z �"� . t 4, ` _ y� - . 9�.- t� � ' ' ` I y � _,� •'.I' � � •�� • - , ~.•.! � 1s1r � ri ;� ' .� �� , �. � � . �. �;°'� � ,';.sa .r . .s -- '� � Street, ca. 1905, prior to move, located on Burlingame Avenue. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. Figure 9: 1128 Doug . .''r,,,. ' ' , � � 1 " , � � . ~,' � . . ,. , s . 1 •. '� r ��,. � ' . yr a • ••-••-. ... . ..'i. _ _.. �:,. �,..= %-_ ` `. t i i -, �: . ..C; >> 1 .� , . �. •, . . (.I. • -.,,,' ,�Y _ ,°q . . . _ru;,�; ' • : _ - a � ~ . .. r. �I' . - . k�'7 � " Figure 10: 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map of the subject block with 1128 Douglas Avenue lot (building not yet moved) highlighted in red; edited by author. Primary # HRI # Trinomial DPR �23L � r. nY ` ' _. Primary # HRI # Trinomial i - � - �..�'��. ;. � .�-.._. ��! r ; � � : _ _ � ��.- - �f �-:�.��* Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue *Date May 2013 O Continuation ❑ Update r�• .�' ,� �..,�,. r �r f � Figure 6: 1128 Douglas Street, 1916, after it was moved (address visible). Source: Burlingame Historical Society. Figure 12: James R. and Jessie Murphy on their porch, 1128 Douglas Street, undated (ca. 1920). Source: Burlingame Historical Society. State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 12 of 13 *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. DPR 523L - . State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Page 13 of 13 'Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. Primary # HRI # Trinomial Resource Name or # 1128 Douglas Avenue *Date May 2013 0 Continuation ❑ Update � . ,� �� • ' - . � . � , -- - ,� • . � =u. _� � � . .,� .. rt' ,. � - . a. �' °�� '' - , . . •'' ' .�� ' ;i ,� y „ ' , •:v� t - E Figure 13: 1921 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map of the subject block with 1128 Douglas Avenue highlighted in red (subject lot larger in size); edited by author. '°e , i: , • . _.; . - • � . � . . �. f., .� ' • • _ . �' i. : i . e ' . , �. .� .. 4 � • � ��,:-,�� .� . . . � . .�,4.� • _ � , `� � ' ,._.,� • ,� • t} . ,i ~�� I ;. R _ -. . , • ,� . . • �� _. . " - .':.v� .': -.. , . ti, • . . - d�,�, • - . " ' : ': :>f . , , � �. � -. �c ` ' �ti . �� Figure 14: 1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map of the subject block with 1128 Douglas Avenue outlined in red (subject lot larger in size); edited by author. DPR 523L _ City of Burlingame Planning Department (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments Project Address: 524 Oak Grove Avenue . Description: Environmental Review and Design Review for demolition of the existing house on-site and replacement of the existing house with a historic house located at 1128 Douglas Avenue and a first and second story addition to the existing 2-story house relocated from Douglas Avenue and a new detached garage. Date of Plans: December 22, 2014 Lot Area: 8,788 SF (survey) Zoning: R-1 1. Design Review (Code Section 25.57.010) • Proposed first and second story addition to the existing relocated house is subject to Design Review. Application has been submitted. No response required. 2. Setbacks (Code Section 25.26.072) i Proposed I. Allowed/Required . . ..........................__........................................_.......................................................,....................... ....................._..._._................... ; --- . ....................... Front (1st flr): ; 15'-0" (to 3'-0" overhang) 15'-0" ' (2nd flr): � 18'-0"' 20'-0" � � ............ .... ..............------.;......................_._.._.__.........................--- ---..__....................._.__._..............:..........................................................__.._.__...__....................__....----.........................; ° Side (exterior - 1 St flr): ; 7'-6" (to 3'-0" overhang) i 7'-6" � (exterior - 2"d flr): ' >12'-0" (average) 12'-0" (average) � (interior ): � 12'-7" 7'-0" :..............................._.__.....................................................---�-..........................—._......_......._..----........................--�--.._........ _.__........._..................._.—....._..........................._..__................ ; �.... Rear (1st flr): ; 71'-0" (to covered porch) � 15'-0" I . ..(2nd.flr)_ ; 77'-0" ; 20 -0 ; ; � �� ■ Do to the number of parcels on the block and the configuration of the parcels, Planning Staff decided to not conduct a"block average" for front setback. ' Front Setback Variance required to proposed second floor (18'-0" front setback proposed where 20'-0" is the minimum required). Application for Front Setback Variance has been submitted. � The proposed project complies with setback regulations. No response required. 3. Lot Coverage (Code Section 25.26.065) 40% x 8788 SF = 3515 SF inaximum allowed ......................................:................................................._..._.._.................._._.._........................._.__....;..............---...............----._..................._._—........,...._.._� : Proposed "i Allowed/Required � �..........__.._ ......................_.._....._.....................---.._...........�...-----._..................._.__..............__. � ................---...............: __..............._...__.._..................----............................---.._...< ' Lot Coverage: ' 2448 SF � 3,515 SF ; i . � 27.8% I 40% :............................................_.............................._..............................;............................................._......................_.._...._....................._..._._.................._.�..__.................._.._.�.............__.—....................._—..................; • The proposed project complies with lot coverage regulations (calculations are attached). No response required. 1 � � � . City of Burlingame Planning Department (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 4. Floor Area Ratio (Code Section 25.26.070) (0.32 x 8788 SF) + 900 SF + 324 SF = 4037 SF inaximum allowed (0.46 FAI � ...................._.._..._.. . _.. . . . , —,_ ................�_..................—�---._..................._._ ; Proposed Allowed/Required � __._._.._ ...................__..............._......_._..._..................._....._...;..............._......_.._....................._....---.................................. .......... Floor Area Ratio: ; 4013 SF 4037 SF , 0.45 FAR 0.46 FAR � The proposed project complies with floor area ratio regulations (calculations are attached). � No response required. 5. Building Height (Code Section 25.26.060) Average top of curb: (96.63' + 95.52')/2 = 96.1' Proposed: 96.1' + 26.56' = 122.66' Allowed: 96.1' + 30' = 126.1' :...................................................................................................._....,................................................................_._....................................----........:........_._.._..................----........._....-----._.................__..._.., ; Proposed Allowed/Required Building Height: ` 26'-8" 30'-0" —_ ...............—.._..................---......_...................�.:....._................................._......................................................_._..............................._:..............................._..............................................................._....__.........................: • Spot elevations at the top of curb (from a licensed land surveyor) were submitted to the Planning Department on June 13, 2014. • The proposed project complies with overall building height regulations. • The proposed project complies with building height regulations. No response required. 6. Declining Height Envelope (DHE) (Code Section 25.26.075) Points of Departure - Right Side: (96.97' + 97.09')/2 = 97.03' - Left Side: (95.54' + g7.49')/2 = 96.52' Finished Floor: 99.0' (from building elevation drawings) ■ Spot elevations at the property corners (from a licensed land surveyor) were submitted to the Planning Department on June 13, 2014. ■ There is no declining height envelope calculation along the right side property line because it is considered the exterior side of the lot. ■ The proposed project complies with declining height envelope regulations. No response required. 2 �C �, City of Burlingame Planning Department (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax) Plan Review Comments 7. Off-Street Parking (Code Section 25.70.030) 4 bedrooms proposed. Proposed: 1 covered (12'-8" x 23'-5" clear interior dimensions) + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Required: 1 covered (10' x 20' clear interior dimensions) + 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ■ The proposed project complies with off-street parking requirements. No response required. 8. Landscaping (Code Section 11.06.090) Based on the proposed FAR (4013 SF), four landscape trees are required on the property. The Landscape Plan (sheet L1.1) indicates five proposed landscape trees and three existing landscape trees on the property. No response required. 9. Accessory Structure (Detached Garage) (Code Section 25.60) ■ The detached garage is exempt from side and rear setback requirements since it is entirely located within the rear 30% of the lot. ■ 15'-0" overall height proposed from adjacent grade where 15'-0" is the maximum allowed. ■ 8'-6" plate height proposed from adjacent grade where 9'-0" is the maximum allowed. No response required. 10. Environmental Review ■ The environmental document that will be prepared for the relocation of this historic resource from 1128 Douglas Avenue to 524 Oak Grove Avenue will be processed with the condominium permit for the new project at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue. The type of environmental document required for both projects has not been determined at this time. No response required. 3