Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1576 Cypress Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Special Permits Address: 1576 Cypress Avenue Item No. 3 Action Item Meeting Date: March 10, 2014 Request: Application for Special Permits for accessory structure length and reduction in the number of parking spaces on site to replace an existing two-car detached garage with a detached one-car garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Peter G. Comaroto Designer: Enertia Designs General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-295-130 Lot Area: 8300 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section15303 (e), which states that construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences is exempt from environmental review. History: On April 14, 2003 the Planning Commission approved an application for design review for a first and second story addition and special permits for a new detached garage (see attached April 14, 2003 Planning Commission Minutes). The approved garage measured 14' wide x 36' deep, 504 SF in area. Special permits were required because 1) the detached garage exceeded 28'-0" in length and 2) because there was a reduction in the number of existing parking spaces on site (replacing an existing two-car garage with a one-car garage). The first and second story addition was completed; however at that time the property owner decided not to build the new garage and instead retained the existing two-car garage. The property owner is now proposing to replace the existing two-car garage with a one-car garage, in the same location and size as the previously approved detached garage approved by the Planning Commission in 2003. However, the design of the proposed single-car detached is different than the 2003 approval (see previously approved elevations attached to staff report and proposed plans, date stamped March 3, 2014). Project Description: The subject property is pie-shaped, narrows towards the rear of the site and then widens again (see Site Plan). Currently, the subject property contains a two-story, four-bedroom house and a detached two-car garage at the rear of the lot. The applicant is proposing to replace an existing detached two-car garage (400 SF) with a new detached one-car garage (504 SF, 14' wide x 36' deep). The detached garage will contain stucco siding, asphalt shingle roofing, a metal door at the front and wood French doors along the left side, aluminum clad wood windows, wood vents and an exterior fireplace/brick chimney. The proposed detached garage is not subject to design review. With the new detached garage, the floor area on the property will increase from 4,034 SF (0.49 FAR) to 4,138 SF (0.49 FAR), where 4,156 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 18 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). The applicant is requesting approval of two special permits for construction of the new detached garage. The first is for the length of the detached garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the maximum allowed without a special permit). The second special permit is for a reduction in the number of existing parking spaces on site; reducing from three existing parking spaces (two covered + one uncovered) to two parking spaces (one covered + one uncovered). As noted below, the proposed garage complies with the off-street parking requirement for a four-bedroom house. Please referto the Special PermitApplication submitted bythe applicantwhich addresses the special permit requests. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for the existing four-bedroom house. The new detached garage (13'-0" wide x 20'-0" deep clear interior dimensions) provides one covered space; one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. The rear portion of the garage extending beyond the 20-foot depth of the parking space (217 SF) would be used for storage, which is limited to 10% of the area of the house, or in this case 363 SF. All other zoning code requirements have been met. Specia/ Permits The applicant is requesting the following applications: 1576 Cypress Avenue ■ Special Permit for length of a new detached one-car garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.26.035 (e)); and ■ Special Perrnit for a reduction in the number of parking spaces on site (from three parking spaces to two parking spaces) to replace an existing detached two-car garage with a detached one-car garage (C.S. 25.26.035 (b)). 1576 Cypress Avenue Lot Area: ti:iUU Sr rlans aate stam ed: Marcn �, LU14 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Lof Coverage: 3180 SF 3284 SF 3320 SF 38.3% 39.5% 40% FAR: 4034 SF 4138 SF 4156 SF' 0.49 FAR 0.49 FAR 0.50 FAR _. , . _.. ......................................_.................. Windows in n/a window located more windows within 10' of Accessory Strucfure: than 10' from rear ; property line or more than property line and less 10' above grade require a than 10' above grade Conditional Use Permit _ _.....__._ _ _ ...... _........ _ ....... _. ._.._ _...._.. _...... _ _.... ._.._... # of bedrooms: 4 no change --- Ofif-Street Parking: 2 covered 1 covered 1 covered 1 uncovered (13'-0" x 20'-0") (10'-0" x 20'-0") 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') _._.. _ .. _._.... _... _ . _. ._..._. # of On Site Parking 3 2 z ; special permit required for Spaces: : a reduction in the number of parking spaces on site _.__._ ................................__.................................. ........................ ......._................_..........._..........................................._....................._......................._........._.........._................._... ................_..._..........._............ .. _ _......................_...__ Length ofAccessory 20'-0" 36'-0" 3 special permit required if Structure: length or width exceeds 28'-0„ Heighi ofAccessory n/a 8'-0" to top of plate 9'-0" to top of plate Structure: 15'-0" to top of ridge 15'-0" to top of ridge ' (0.32 x 8300 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 4156 SF (0.50 FAR) 2 Special Permit required for a reduction in the number of parking spaces on site (from three parking spaces to two parking spaces) to replace an existing detached two-car garage with a detached one-car garage. 3 Special Permit required for length of a new detached one-car garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the maximum allowed). 2 Special Permits 1576 Cypress Avenue Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that since this request for Special Permits is for replacement of an existing two-car garage with a one-car garage at the rear of the lot and is similar to the detached garage previously approved by the Planning Commission in 2003, the application was placed directly on the action calendar. If the Commission feels there is a need for more discussion, this item may be placed on a future action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Since this application was initially submitted as a building permit, the applicant is in the process of addressing comments from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit for accessory structure length and a reduction in the number of existing space on-site, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 3, 2014, sheets A-1 and A-2, and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the detached garage shall only be used for parking and shall not be used for accessory living or sleeping purposes; 3. - that if the accessory.structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permits as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. 3 Special Permits Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Peter G. Comaroto, applicant and property owner Attachments: Aprii 14, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes Plans of Detached Garage Previously Approved by Planning Commission in April 2003 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Applications Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 28, 2014 Aerial Photo 1576 Cypress Avenue 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes 2. 1755 ROI DISPLAY COASTS� �IN OAD, ZONED M-1 APPLICATION FOR CO A(SHOWROOM) EEDING 5,000 SF IN ORTH, CARLILE C TSWORTH ARCHITECT T AND PROPE OWNER PROJECT PLA April 14, 2003 AL USE PERMIT FOR A ,�OI-1 ZONING DISTRICT ALVIN C, ARCHITECT; ROB T RIGGS, CATHERINE BA R �P Monroe presented a mmary of the staff report. C issioners asked staff if t signage shown on the plans was part of t proposal. Staff responded , all signs require a sepa e permit. Commis ' n complimented th pplicant on the photo exhib' that were submitted, they e clear and descripti . This item w s set for the consent calend at the next meeting. This i m concluded at 7:26 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless sepaYate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner pYior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Vice-Chair Bojues asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 3A. 3000 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE FOR A NEW ENTRY CANOPY AND DECK ADDITION (TECTA ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; RABIH BALLOUT, PROPERTY OWNERS) (27 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• CATHERINE BARBER �3B. 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GARAGE DEPTH FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (PETER AND SANDY COMARATO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER CATHERINE BARBER 3C. 1136 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO STORY DWELLING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (JERRY DEAL, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; STEVE AND ALISA JOHNSON, PROPERTY OWNERS) (67 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• ERIKA LEWIT 3D. 753 ACACIA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A NEW SINGLE CAR DETACHED GARAGE (REMY SIJBRANT, APPLICANT, DESIGNER, PROPERTY OWNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• RUBEN HURIN C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by individual resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 5-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg and Keighran absent). Appeal procedures were advised. 2 ^�6.»A. ,de � \ / �.la �O i`�� ,.°'�� , ' / ' ,1,. ovfl.'+& �P '(� �E P��ry6o \ � \ \ ` �-���� , \ , �Krti 6� . � i � . � � `\ ti l- - �'�`\ ' .4�'���R�) d � I s+� _ �, 1 � � rb�e,�,,.r .1 �.,a-w �ti � �� .��F) ' LM SECOHD P'�� R /�oq iory aaJeM1TIJ�6KM 1 GeM��H'71�e1iMINGl65 [a^�.N. ...�r�a-FEEL�iT' t �nRul C0./Gw�.W A�rM (61Q ��IrN 1 -,Y«_ i� M•Tw C° w+au+¢ -- --. . _—. _ _ _ _ - — --,. .-, _ - --_ .. — — ,s — _= _ _ - -- __ _ _..- �--� . �=9'aN a , N. •� — — - { r� � 3_,�_ — _ _ _ ' .._. . _ \ = f•P / — ~�-,-�� . F .3� j����ii '_ ' _' '."'__ " �.:.� � M-Y � �j i1�`' ; . . . . . ...� .. . .. -. .ae�.�m�. . � . . ' , � ' ���� L d� �di9�is.i2 (� �jj�j —t-1? �'� �t ' aren lJU 'wi I,' Q _J� —! � y t[�fljiii;�p y �ue 1s n5=N oe . � y ' S =i i:71 � � .. . . ca!F'!'!a° � �. �Yr. . �� �'::. 0 - c;c, �:i��i'j,i__=ie. r . ..'•.. , .. ... ,.: �' � .�• ' 0� ... .. _ ... ..:., �� i . . .. . ... . . . . . .< ... ... . . .. . ' � ww.. I ;-���ij�•,'� .;r .._ ....._ . _.. _'_' ��' _ . ' _ __ — _ . ... i - 3��'L< .. , „jj ,; �_ SOUTH ELEVATION u--Fa•� FAST ELEVATION w--r-0- p����;� �� f,Sj4`.=�;? vnoruw Pti ' . Si[.IfS - a crnlw+-cr��•1) . . . . . _ . . _ _ _._,. . ._.... _ _ . ' � �,� �:.� � • -----� -, �_ .- _. . _ _ _ . _. - .. —_ .. _._ . _ . _ �:' . . .. --_ _ ._ ._ _ = r - - -- --- — -- _ _ _ � � . . _ - �� � � • .. � (Ro .rer+�s.+q � � � - —E . 3 .. ` ' s,u� r€1 . . 4lL � . o . '. + . €1 . �� . .. . , ' � r� � �-ne Fc. . . . .. . . � . 1 e .. ' - : �. .. 1'-NR FF ' .. . . V ^� � ^� .. �� �� - ,. �.._ ... ..._.. . . . �� . � F : q. . 7 Mrrt sr �c ��� i� � `Wn q� � V, . 1VORTH ELEVATIO[`i w--r�' wNcr:r � � � ' . a�c r�.r*���o� � r � C4 � ' Nf3iTMlMMetrr I.p4'fcw�'hN�i/+nA�C yn,d � � I . �� W �.-,.�H�t,�.,�w e,.Tr� J pf lL_� I oQ�v — ���� . � � � � � / _ j' . ) � G� . — �,.cruq Mr �� °; U C� 0.1 i _ �+xso '6P � Yn rH r...r�o.ycl V� Il M^F� M ��� - 30 �Y��I'�'� . lIX. �aVdm�w � , �1 . TOO Nd� r . iuceo ror wr�vWd � ' � ros w��^� ' b . ��1rt �.rt. rn ryrw .. . . . �NIO �mm1l�Jv� � cn� � I . _. . . � . � ' � ' te� �.4 �'' : � : : z 4 � 1 . . . r�mr �: �riw..a � � ' ` •��::� � .- j� d= oN ' � I e WEST ELEVAT10Nw--rr H��'' d� "'d' �.`,:s�� • +�a \ �ma �..ar.ti.u. . . w;� o.�� ra�.r�• ns. Iw' jy \ I / — ns `L / \ I��� '��;�. C�� . \ r�{ `�.\ \ `-- —' - — \\_ � / `�_ __. . _ . . . ._._ _ ...._ � . CC1 S� o � W A t- K I_. . . - - .-.` �wn j � � f _. _ �-n �A � -T � F� � �=.�iC 1 �� wwx[ ��,�T CTi'E PLAN in^. r+• i � GY P R B 5 S AV�FJ u� � �� � m � a.rv.wr x""a. : : . OFl �w�/fiW isvq�w � M�• 1� ie�T�=�.v�...�coK I ' I j.i� z . b . roiu«aa . - � [,� O au�ir � . d'�iv .vi.:dr� • � � q �7 �.r �. cw m,.. � U o x� . �.n�.�.r�i..o O � �„. n rtse..ra..:�e. �y. �xu . H �hM..xaa..q � i. . H W�+�a...r � Q m "a GARAGE'FLOOR PLAN � , _ . . , _ , . .. .���_, : ,`��h3 .. ���.� REVIEWED .., � ' . PIAW:Vf3Fe1➢f�o"_ "9M1f aen+ "�dN1R�r --•- ti:�� �G-1 -�__.sp...a-��..F�... �,�` - - - ^-_._._.�:r��:auy;a�.��a'- - - - i�. .. : -r►'', rv�:� � [3VRLINGAME ��1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 028-295-130 ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: 1576 Cypress Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 APPLICANT project contact person � OK to send electronic copies of documents B N81'Tle: Peter G Comaroto AddC'eSS: 1576 Cypress Avenue City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010 Ph011e: 650-787-1743 Fax E-mail: p�maroto@gmail.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact Person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: Enertia Desiqns Address: »67 Mission Street City/State/Zip: San Francisco, CA 94010 PhOf1e: 415-626-8300 Fax PROPERTY OWNER Project contact person � OK to send electronic copies of documents � NBme: Peter G Comaroto Addt'2SS: 1576 Cypress Avenue City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010 PhOf12: 650-787-1743 Fax: E-mail: pcomaroto@gmail.com � t.� i 'f� � � � �� i �� L'.� I'7 E-m8il: lefferson@enertiadesigns.com '-'�-'°:�� ",�+:;'� * Burlingame Business License #: Pencu�g- � `� �3 .`� �� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo existing garage and build new AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: ;I here certify r p nalty of p` f�e information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief� �� � Applicant's signature: ' Date: 2�12/14 ! am aware of the proposed a lica �on nd here uthor e the abo e a�plicant to submit this application to the Planning � Commission. � i : � � „ „ . ,, . „ , Property owner's sig '"� Date:2�12�14 Date submitted: 2I �� l�¢ �r Verification that the project architectJdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. 5: �HANDOUTS`PC Application. doc City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION 1 ' 4i ... .�. r� . L� dr � � �; 7�,; -�- BURLINGAME � R � P�.- k,.,� s�Q �S , �,-.��, ,, � �� v' c-;� a r � , The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1 S.e e a-4-�a. a�l ed- . 2, Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new strucfure or addition are consisfent with the exisfing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How wil/ the proposed project be consistent with fhe residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new sfructure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the ciiy's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for ihe removal of any trees? Explain why fhis mitigation is appropriafe. Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characferistics of the new construciion or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood, City Of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit Application Reduction of Parking Spaces In summary we are adding many architectural features to the garage as the garage sidewall is a border to the rear yard. The architectural features that we are adding are side doors and dormers. Our goal is to make the garage appearance more pleasing. In addition the dormer windows will face into my yard and will be opposite of my neighbor. I believe that these would create less chance for instruction on to neighboring properties than would sky lights. 1. The garage is being built in the same vicinity/area as the original garage. It is located in the back of the lot next to neighbor garages. a. Public Health There will be no sanitation, sewer discharge, no water supply issues as there will be no running water or garbage storage area in, on, or near the structure b. Public Safety i. The new configuration will allow for easier access to the rear of the lot for all public safety professionals. An alarm will be installed and no hazardous materials or work will be conducted inside garage c. General Welfare The social benefit is that it will allow for easier access to open and usable areas of the lot d. Convenience i. The general public will not have access to this private residence garage 2. The garage complies with Burlingame general plans and ordinances. 3. The new garage will allow for more usable open space as the lot is currently constricted in the back where the garage is currently located. More usable open area will be created. a. The proposed garage aesthetics is consistent with existing homes in the area and was designed to blend into the existing home and c. � adjacent home structures. b. The new garage is in the rear of the lot and does not impact long term parking i. Furthermore the driveway runs most of the length of the lot and provides for ample additional parking on the private lot. The new garage is consistent with the location size, architecture, orientation with other garages in the general neighborhood The new structure will not change the density or general use pattern of my home nor the neighborhood. There will be not impact to parking, traffic. e. The new garage is consistent with zoning requirements for 3 bedroom homes in my area. City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq c�Tr r ' �' �` ian�� ' o�i��: 9lon��c CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION Le,-,� �-�, �-�-- �} �� c s s ��� S-�, �-f -� ��, The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City s Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1, Explain why fhe blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent v�ith the existing structure's design and wifh the existing streef and neighborhood. S-e.� a�����d, 2, Explain how fhe variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the exisfing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with fhe residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain how the removal of any trees locafed wifhin the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consisient wifh the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigaiion is appropriate. Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM City Of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit Application Length of Accessory Structure In summary we are adding many architectural features to the garage as the garage sidewall is a border to the rear yard. The architectural features that we are adding are side doors and dormers. Our goal is to make the garage appearance more pleasing. In addition the dormer windows will face into my yard and will be opposite of my neighbor. I believe that these would create less chance for instruction on to neighboring properties than would sky lights. 1. The garage is being built in the same vicinity/area as the original garage. It is located in the back of the lot next to neighbor garages. a. Public Health There will be no sanitation, sewer discharge, no water supply issues as there will be no running water or garbage storage area in, on, or near the structure b. Public Safery i. The new configuration will allow for easier access to the rear of the lot for all public safety professionals. An alarm will be installed and no hazardous materials or work will be conducted inside garage c. General Welfare The social benefit is that it will allow for easier access to open and usable areas of the lot d. Convenience i. The general public will not have access to this private residence garage 2. The garage complies with Burlingame general plans and ordinances. 3. The new garage will allow for more usable open space as the lot is currently constricted in the back where the garage is currently located. More usable open area will be created. a. The proposed garage aesthetics is consistent with existing homes in the area and was designed to blend into the existing home and adjacent home structures. b. The new garage is in the rear of the lot and does not impact long term parking c. The new garage is consistent with the location size, architecture, orientation with other garages in the general neighborhood d. The new structure will not change the density or general use pattern of my home nor the neighborhood. There will be not impact to parking, traffic. e. The new garage is consistent with zoning requirements for 3 bedroom homes in my area. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for S ecial Permit for accessory structure lenqth and reduction in the number of parkinq spaces on site to replace an existinq two-car detached qaraqe with a detached one-car qaraqe at 1576 Cvpress Avenue, Zoned R-1, Peter G. Comaroto, 1576 Cvpress Avenue, Burlinqame, CA, 94010, property owner, APN: 028- 295-130; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 10, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (e), which states that construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences, is hereby approved. 2. Said Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th dav of March, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Special Permits 1576 Cypress Avenue Effective March 20, 2014 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 3, 2014, sheets A-1 and A-2, and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the detached garage shall only be used for parking and shall not be used for accessory living or sleeping purposes; 3. that if the accessory structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permits as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. . CITY OF BURUNGAME , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��;�� ', BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �~"�y�'�, �; PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall (ouncil Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Special Permits for accessory structure length and reduction in the number of parking spaces on site to repla�e an existing two-car detached garage with a detached one-car gnrage at 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 028-295-130 Mailed: Februnry 28, 2014 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. if you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUB�.IC HEARING NOTICE (P/ease refer to other sideJ ' '�,�aIC f5� P� � 1� ,�wW .. � � . - t �, . , r . .. . .1 •`r : . . A w � P� �. ., ' � �. . . . . j �� . ..�-,.�y�, , �. . - t• .�... ;_ . . . .. _ .��.. �.� * 'i - , . , -, . .,�� y(. - . � . .' .. �.� � �� / � y � ��y � . .d � fi r, v� F� 1 S� ,� P iP r'� , j��r,y � ^� « . k , � � .' �� �'.�T; . �#�'%� ��. . { , '� ' ,�'� � � a� . �. . ._ .._,� 3. , . � , .; . :�p.. q - s ' � .�,,( ... '.1. � �. - ^� . M�i' �, S ,; . 4 �� � _ . . . . �i � . , �,� >,`,.�r �' �� � �� , � �"' : ' � � ' - :. � 1 . s5r ..,, _ .;, , , ,.... �, �.`�.:.- . �. �j� 'i � ° '! � . -`�c"�" �.� r _ ..�. � t . � . � . ...,;: i. - 1n '�V � ! Y * .(. * � . 3 ' � _.�'"` � �� �����y� � yY �'"'�+� ;� l�, it + , � `"a �. ' .: � `- _. _. - c 4 ' ` S. � r. � � �� ' .. x . .: u • .;� .� ' _ .. .. �.,,�(�y �'� �� � i��., � ��`1`^ �1' �' .:�,1► -., �;. � ;. ��J� � ;�; �f ,'. � �` b ..� ` t ' ,�"' � � � t' 'S ri� -� ...: � ! d #';,si- y2 . :4 �: k' � y t1 r �� ' �,.� �' ,�y ��_� m rt . . � �. . . ' �j ��� _ :.� ` � � d{ � @_,. �i •" � { ,�! �c.. � ,y�„� �� {�. '` ?f�� y.,` � ,�,�, � ���'� ,��' � .:ti d �t`'4` 4 ��� �si w+ r . . � �� �....n:. ��q�, � , � , ��."' .I J�. �` - , {� 'y �:. .{' a "'� _� €. J � '�`�` � �' t y�► �, � ,� •� y,� "'� � , e�"' :� � ' � � } . �. ! �. � � ` ..Ayq; �. � � ♦ � � ri.n► 4.,,"` � " ,e�.� �-;,iK ? � � 'S _ � '��' , `,; � v� �,;,.. .- �� � .a ;y i,' ' � _.:• - p^ .., 4 ;; . M�. L..��. ? . - ' '�'� ,: ' .�..� . .� � ,� 4 c'd" �S`p xy � �'�. .. .t, 'C � �'"'* - . ... j '�`��� � � ;�. ' 4� �� ! '��i '� .��� `��' �`LiF • � i ` " � `+/A� f� • f� � `_ '�!. "� '� � Y�r}..� �� �-..� .��t:. :;� q ,��a �i, � � � � �� �: � � � qa- �4 . �' : . ` "�• �c�, - - � ��� x ,1�,. �, � � �.�. � . � - ,� ,. � � � � s, . . � .. � ` � '- 0 . , ,. ..• . • . ` . �. .. � . �: t�; � �: ... ,� — .`'`�' a . #• � ' { � . � � � 3 - ,� � . a �' �,. �1M�"� � � �' ,� � A� ^ t y . '� �' . a � ^ .� .:,,s * ,. � .> '�-, -Yr'' :; ' ` � `'� � ..� � � . . h i M�I��. � ` . ,y1�: j. - ,� r �;; �: � y. . �., ,*f. _ � �f ' �� A 'i y f ' r �r r �, � �.�' . i°4'. �r�, t �'r �1!' R �it ` �' » 'I Rr3 "r �,a � ; �' � ''-� � �° � ,�rp ^ % + � i � . � Y�r`���'� I . .. '�+ .. ....., ^w. •, .;.} `. ^� } L� ^�� c�.�'� . � � . .. � .}' � �: �. y, �' ` � # 1'' . . . F� -�t �. � - i�• , ��� � ';.` . e `"�,,s ,, �` a�'�� �, s' �,� �#, .'��" `. .. : . . � t p� �.��,x,"�e, y : '' _ ` '�. .h . ' ,o," ,�.� , � ,'j �````�`'�: • � d r r� � ^ ,$�' � O , , � • � �� e�� ��� ` r,k�? i ` ,r ����� ` . �., �` �' . �y,. � X' �" d . • ' �•�. `�''� 1 * . .: .. , '` � ��r�� ,��' ,�.:�. � � �„ � �r - � � ,. .�- �- �.. �� � �� �� y�' � �{, ''•ti- �. � ` ..r i ^' f "`'f x '�� �� _��" IF�'�+�� '8 . . �� . � � : � i��� ���� s . . . , . .. . � , �; : , �., � ,y. ��� . _ ,;,. �. w.... . . _ ��� �. �, � : � �„�,t�t `,. �, „ �, , : �� , ' �x �z �� �''i+, r' y, : �r.. - �t,�.. g . �>' • '€ t +. �kS-. � "Y � .w �.,y��� � :%� �,.a�. �:� � _1. , , ���yr .�� �^ '� y 1i , ih ,i r �� N• Jf� J �`� s4 �1 �% � .. � Lt . t�. �� ` . �q.M✓ . ( �. �ti ��-- . Y- . .�� � ; . R � . ` " Y• � � �'.�'r '�Ri�� V y' ~ �y L � , �� � � � :��1��+ •�* �� � ���.� . T�� t ' _ � .i�.. /!` . ..� � ti ` ..� ��i :.11 "S. : � � ' 'If�:�6'J�IiG. � • .� �� .:��k � � � ��� sJ '�4;��, � � � � ,s / �� ' � � - C r. • , ` .c'-4�� .. �J� � ����, :;� �iG.'�F;,-��- ,r:r �.s.�..v.• 't t�i`�/. g .".