HomeMy WebLinkAbout1576 Cypress Avenue - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame
Special Permits
Address: 1576 Cypress Avenue
Item No. 3
Action Item
Meeting Date: March 10, 2014
Request: Application for Special Permits for accessory structure length and reduction in the number of parking
spaces on site to replace an existing two-car detached garage with a detached one-car garage.
Applicant and Property Owner: Peter G. Comaroto
Designer: Enertia Designs
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 028-295-130
Lot Area: 8300 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section15303 (e), which states that construction and location of limited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures including accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages,
carports, patios, swimming pools and fences is exempt from environmental review.
History: On April 14, 2003 the Planning Commission approved an application for design review for a first and
second story addition and special permits for a new detached garage (see attached April 14, 2003 Planning
Commission Minutes). The approved garage measured 14' wide x 36' deep, 504 SF in area. Special permits
were required because 1) the detached garage exceeded 28'-0" in length and 2) because there was a reduction
in the number of existing parking spaces on site (replacing an existing two-car garage with a one-car garage).
The first and second story addition was completed; however at that time the property owner decided not to build
the new garage and instead retained the existing two-car garage.
The property owner is now proposing to replace the existing two-car garage with a one-car garage, in the same
location and size as the previously approved detached garage approved by the Planning Commission in 2003.
However, the design of the proposed single-car detached is different than the 2003 approval (see previously
approved elevations attached to staff report and proposed plans, date stamped March 3, 2014).
Project Description: The subject property is pie-shaped, narrows towards the rear of the site and then widens
again (see Site Plan). Currently, the subject property contains a two-story, four-bedroom house and a detached
two-car garage at the rear of the lot. The applicant is proposing to replace an existing detached two-car garage
(400 SF) with a new detached one-car garage (504 SF, 14' wide x 36' deep). The detached garage will contain
stucco siding, asphalt shingle roofing, a metal door at the front and wood French doors along the left side,
aluminum clad wood windows, wood vents and an exterior fireplace/brick chimney. The proposed detached
garage is not subject to design review. With the new detached garage, the floor area on the property will
increase from 4,034 SF (0.49 FAR) to 4,138 SF (0.49 FAR), where 4,156 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum allowed
(project is 18 SF below the maximum allowed FAR).
The applicant is requesting approval of two special permits for construction of the new detached garage. The
first is for the length of the detached garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the maximum allowed without a
special permit). The second special permit is for a reduction in the number of existing parking spaces on site;
reducing from three existing parking spaces (two covered + one uncovered) to two parking spaces (one covered
+ one uncovered). As noted below, the proposed garage complies with the off-street parking requirement for a
four-bedroom house. Please referto the Special PermitApplication submitted bythe applicantwhich addresses
the special permit requests.
Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for the existing four-bedroom house. The new
detached garage (13'-0" wide x 20'-0" deep clear interior dimensions) provides one covered space; one
uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. The rear portion of the garage extending beyond
the 20-foot depth of the parking space (217 SF) would be used for storage, which is limited to 10% of the area of
the house, or in this case 363 SF. All other zoning code requirements have been met.
Specia/ Permits
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
1576 Cypress Avenue
■ Special Permit for length of a new detached one-car garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the
maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.26.035 (e)); and
■ Special Perrnit for a reduction in the number of parking spaces on site (from three parking spaces to two
parking spaces) to replace an existing detached two-car garage with a detached one-car garage (C.S.
25.26.035 (b)).
1576 Cypress Avenue
Lot Area: ti:iUU Sr rlans aate stam ed: Marcn �, LU14
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS
Lof Coverage: 3180 SF 3284 SF 3320 SF
38.3% 39.5% 40%
FAR: 4034 SF 4138 SF 4156 SF'
0.49 FAR 0.49 FAR 0.50 FAR
_. , . _.. ......................................_..................
Windows in n/a window located more windows within 10' of
Accessory Strucfure: than 10' from rear ; property line or more than
property line and less 10' above grade require a
than 10' above grade Conditional Use Permit
_ _.....__._ _ _ ...... _........ _ ....... _. ._.._ _...._.. _...... _ _.... ._.._...
# of bedrooms: 4 no change ---
Ofif-Street Parking: 2 covered 1 covered 1 covered
1 uncovered (13'-0" x 20'-0") (10'-0" x 20'-0")
1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') ' (9' x 20')
_._.. _ .. _._.... _... _ . _. ._..._.
# of On Site Parking 3 2 z ; special permit required for
Spaces: : a reduction in the number
of parking spaces on site
_.__._ ................................__.................................. ........................ ......._................_..........._..........................................._....................._......................._........._.........._................._... ................_..._..........._............ .. _ _......................_...__
Length ofAccessory 20'-0" 36'-0" 3 special permit required if
Structure: length or width exceeds
28'-0„
Heighi ofAccessory n/a 8'-0" to top of plate 9'-0" to top of plate
Structure: 15'-0" to top of ridge 15'-0" to top of ridge
' (0.32 x 8300 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 4156 SF (0.50 FAR)
2 Special Permit required for a reduction in the number of parking spaces on site (from three parking spaces to
two parking spaces) to replace an existing detached two-car garage with a detached one-car garage.
3 Special Permit required for length of a new detached one-car garage (36'-0" proposed where 28'-0" is the
maximum allowed).
2
Special Permits 1576 Cypress Avenue
Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that since this request for Special Permits is for replacement of an
existing two-car garage with a one-car garage at the rear of the lot and is similar to the detached garage
previously approved by the Planning Commission in 2003, the application was placed directly on the action
calendar. If the Commission feels there is a need for more discussion, this item may be placed on a future
action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant.
Since this application was initially submitted as a building permit, the applicant is in the process of addressing
comments from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit for accessory structure length and a reduction
in the number of existing space on-site, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on
the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or
addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is
appropriate.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
March 3, 2014, sheets A-1 and A-2, and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory
structure shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that the detached garage shall only be used for parking and shall not be used for accessory living or
sleeping purposes;
3. - that if the accessory.structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Special Permits
as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void;
4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
5. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
3
Special Permits
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Peter G. Comaroto, applicant and property owner
Attachments:
Aprii 14, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Plans of Detached Garage Previously Approved by Planning Commission in April 2003
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Applications
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 28, 2014
Aerial Photo
1576 Cypress Avenue
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
2. 1755 ROI
DISPLAY
COASTS�
�IN OAD, ZONED M-1 APPLICATION FOR CO
A(SHOWROOM) EEDING 5,000 SF IN
ORTH, CARLILE C TSWORTH ARCHITECT
T AND PROPE OWNER PROJECT PLA
April 14, 2003
AL USE PERMIT FOR A
,�OI-1 ZONING DISTRICT ALVIN
C, ARCHITECT; ROB T RIGGS,
CATHERINE BA R
�P Monroe presented a mmary of the staff report. C issioners asked staff if t signage shown on the
plans was part of t proposal. Staff responded , all signs require a sepa e permit. Commis ' n
complimented th pplicant on the photo exhib' that were submitted, they e clear and descripti .
This item w s set for the consent calend at the next meeting. This i m concluded at 7:26 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously
unless sepaYate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner
pYior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Vice-Chair Bojues asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. There were no requests.
3A. 3000 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE FOR A NEW ENTRY CANOPY
AND DECK ADDITION (TECTA ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; RABIH BALLOUT,
PROPERTY OWNERS) (27 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• CATHERINE BARBER
�3B. 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR GARAGE DEPTH FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (PETER AND
SANDY COMARATO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER)
(61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER CATHERINE BARBER
3C. 1136 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW
TWO STORY DWELLING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE (JERRY DEAL, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; STEVE AND ALISA JOHNSON,
PROPERTY OWNERS) (67 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• ERIKA LEWIT
3D. 753 ACACIA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A
NEW SINGLE CAR DETACHED GARAGE (REMY SIJBRANT, APPLICANT, DESIGNER,
PROPERTY OWNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER• RUBEN HURIN
C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioner's
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by
individual resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair called for a voice vote on the
motion and it passed 5-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg and Keighran absent). Appeal procedures were advised.
2
^�6.»A.
,de
�
\
/
�.la �O
i`��
,.°'�� , '
/ ' ,1,.
ovfl.'+& �P
'(� �E P��ry6o \ � \ \ `
�-���� ,
\ , �Krti 6� .
� i
� .
� � `\
ti l- - �'�`\ '
.4�'���R�) d �
I s+�
_ �, 1 �
� rb�e,�,,.r
.1
�.,a-w
�ti �
��
.��F) '
LM SECOHD P'�� R
/�oq iory
aaJeM1TIJ�6KM 1 GeM��H'71�e1iMINGl65 [a^�.N. ...�r�a-FEEL�iT'
t �nRul C0./Gw�.W A�rM (61Q ��IrN 1 -,Y«_ i� M•Tw C° w+au+¢
-- --. . _—. _ _ _ _ -
— --,. .-, _ - --_
..
— — ,s
— _= _ _ - -- __ _ _..- �--� . �=9'aN a ,
N. •� — — - { r� � 3_,�_
— _ _ _ ' .._. . _ \ = f•P / — ~�-,-�� . F .3� j����ii
'_ ' _' '."'__ " �.:.� � M-Y � �j i1�`' ;
. . . . . ...� .. . .. -. .ae�.�m�.
. � . . ' , � ' ���� L d� �di9�is.i2
(� �jj�j —t-1? �'�
�t ' aren lJU 'wi I,' Q _J� —! � y t[�fljiii;�p
y �ue 1s n5=N oe . � y ' S =i i:71
� � .. . . ca!F'!'!a° � �. �Yr. . �� �'::. 0 - c;c, �:i��i'j,i__=ie.
r
. ..'•.. , .. ... ,.: �' � .�• ' 0� ... .. _ ...
..:.,
�� i
. . .. . ... . . . . . .<
... ...
. . .. . ' � ww.. I ;-���ij�•,'� .;r
.._ ....._ . _.. _'_' ��'
_ . ' _ __ — _ . ... i - 3��'L< ..
, „jj ,; �_
SOUTH ELEVATION u--Fa•� FAST ELEVATION w--r-0- p����;� ��
f,Sj4`.=�;?
vnoruw Pti ' . Si[.IfS -
a crnlw+-cr��•1) . . . . .
_ . . _ _ _._,. . ._.... _ _ . ' � �,� �:.�
� • -----� -, �_ .-
_. . _ _
_ . _. - .. —_ .. _._ . _ . _ �:' . . ..
--_ _ ._ ._ _ =
r - - -- --- — -- _ _ _ � � .
. _ - �� � � •
.. � (Ro .rer+�s.+q � � � - —E . 3 ..
` ' s,u� r€1 . . 4lL � .
o . '. + . €1 . �� . .. .
, ' � r� � �-ne Fc. . . . .. . . � .
1 e ..
' - : �. .. 1'-NR FF ' .. . . V ^� � ^� ..
�� �� - ,. �.._ ... ..._.. . . . �� . � F : q. .
7 Mrrt sr �c ��� i� � `Wn q� � V, .
1VORTH ELEVATIO[`i w--r�' wNcr:r � � �
' . a�c r�.r*���o� � r � C4 �
' Nf3iTMlMMetrr I.p4'fcw�'hN�i/+nA�C yn,d � � I . �� W
�.-,.�H�t,�.,�w e,.Tr� J pf lL_� I oQ�v
— ���� . � � � � �
/ _ j' . ) � G�
. — �,.cruq Mr �� °; U C� 0.1 i
_ �+xso
'6P � Yn rH r...r�o.ycl V�
Il M^F� M ���
- 30 �Y��I'�'�
. lIX. �aVdm�w � , �1 .
TOO Nd� r
. iuceo ror wr�vWd � '
� ros w��^� '
b . ��1rt �.rt. rn ryrw .. .
. . �NIO �mm1l�Jv� � cn� � I
. _. . . � .
� ' � ' te� �.4 �'' : � : : z 4 �
1
. . . r�mr �: �riw..a � � ' ` •��::� � .- j� d=
oN ' � I e
WEST ELEVAT10Nw--rr H��'' d� "'d' �.`,:s�� • +�a
\ �ma �..ar.ti.u. . . w;�
o.�� ra�.r�• ns. Iw' jy
\ I / — ns
`L /
\ I���
'��;�. C�� .
\ r�{
`�.\ \ `-- —' - —
\\_
� / `�_ __. . _ . . . ._._ _ ...._
� . CC1 S� o � W A t- K
I_. . . - - .-.` �wn
j � � f _. _ �-n �A � -T � F� � �=.�iC
1 �� wwx[
��,�T
CTi'E PLAN in^. r+•
i
� GY P R B 5 S AV�FJ u�
�
�� � m
� a.rv.wr x""a. : :
. OFl �w�/fiW isvq�w � M�• 1� ie�T�=�.v�...�coK I ' I j.i� z
. b . roiu«aa . - � [,� O
au�ir
� . d'�iv .vi.:dr� • � � q �7
�.r �. cw m,.. � U o
x� . �.n�.�.r�i..o O � �„.
n rtse..ra..:�e.
�y. �xu
. H �hM..xaa..q � i.
. H W�+�a...r � Q m "a
GARAGE'FLOOR PLAN �
, _ . . , _ , . .. .���_, : ,`��h3 ..
���.�
REVIEWED .., �
' . PIAW:Vf3Fe1➢f�o"_ "9M1f aen+ "�dN1R�r
--•- ti:�� �G-1
-�__.sp...a-��..F�... �,�` - - - ^-_._._.�:r��:auy;a�.��a'- - - - i�. ..
: -r►'',
rv�:� �
[3VRLINGAME
��1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
� Design Review
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 028-295-130
❑ Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1576 Cypress Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
APPLICANT project contact person �
OK to send electronic copies of documents B
N81'Tle: Peter G Comaroto
AddC'eSS: 1576 Cypress Avenue
City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010
Ph011e: 650-787-1743
Fax
E-mail: p�maroto@gmail.com
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact Person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name:
Enertia Desiqns
Address: »67 Mission Street
City/State/Zip: San Francisco, CA 94010
PhOf1e: 415-626-8300
Fax
PROPERTY OWNER Project contact person �
OK to send electronic copies of documents �
NBme: Peter G Comaroto
Addt'2SS: 1576 Cypress Avenue
City/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA 94010
PhOf12: 650-787-1743
Fax:
E-mail: pcomaroto@gmail.com
� t.� i 'f� � �
� �� i �� L'.� I'7
E-m8il: lefferson@enertiadesigns.com '-'�-'°:�� ",�+:;'�
* Burlingame Business License #: Pencu�g- � `� �3 .`� ��
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo existing garage and build new
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: ;I here certify r p nalty of p` f�e information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief� �� �
Applicant's signature: ' Date: 2�12/14
! am aware of the proposed a lica �on nd here uthor e the abo e a�plicant to submit this application to the Planning
�
Commission. � i : � � „ „ . ,, . „ ,
Property owner's sig
'"� Date:2�12�14
Date submitted: 2I �� l�¢
�r Verification that the project architectJdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
5: �HANDOUTS`PC Application. doc
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
1 ' 4i
... .�. r� . L� dr �
� �; 7�,;
-�-
BURLINGAME
�
R � P�.- k,.,� s�Q �S , �,-.��,
,,
� �� v' c-;� a r � ,
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1
S.e e a-4-�a. a�l ed- .
2, Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations
of the proposed new strucfure or addition are consisfent with the exisfing structure,
street and neighborhood.
3. How wil/ the proposed project be consistent with fhe residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new
sfructure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the ciiy's reforestation
requirements. What mitigation is proposed for ihe removal of any trees? Explain
why fhis mitigation is appropriafe.
Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM
Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characferistics of the
new construciion or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and
with the existing street and neighborhood,
City Of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit Application
Reduction of Parking Spaces
In summary we are adding many architectural features to the garage as the garage
sidewall is a border to the rear yard. The architectural features that we are adding
are side doors and dormers. Our goal is to make the garage appearance more
pleasing.
In addition the dormer windows will face into my yard and will be opposite of my
neighbor. I believe that these would create less chance for instruction on to
neighboring properties than would sky lights.
1. The garage is being built in the same vicinity/area as the original garage. It is
located in the back of the lot next to neighbor garages.
a. Public Health
There will be no sanitation, sewer discharge, no water supply
issues as there will be no running water or garbage storage
area in, on, or near the structure
b. Public Safety
i. The new configuration will allow for easier access to the rear
of the lot for all public safety professionals. An alarm will be
installed and no hazardous materials or work will be
conducted inside garage
c. General Welfare
The social benefit is that it will allow for easier access to open
and usable areas of the lot
d. Convenience
i. The general public will not have access to this private
residence garage
2. The garage complies with Burlingame general plans and ordinances.
3. The new garage will allow for more usable open space as the lot is currently
constricted in the back where the garage is currently located. More usable
open area will be created.
a. The proposed garage aesthetics is consistent with existing homes in
the area and was designed to blend into the existing home and
c.
�
adjacent home structures.
b. The new garage is in the rear of the lot and does not impact long term
parking
i. Furthermore the driveway runs most of the length of the lot
and provides for ample additional parking on the private lot.
The new garage is consistent with the location size, architecture,
orientation with other garages in the general neighborhood
The new structure will not change the density or general use pattern
of my home nor the neighborhood. There will be not impact to
parking, traffic.
e. The new garage is consistent with zoning requirements for 3 bedroom
homes in my area.
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq
c�Tr
r ' �'
�` ian��
' o�i��:
9lon��c
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
Le,-,� �-�, �-�-- �} �� c s s ��� S-�, �-f -� ��,
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City s Ordinance
(Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1, Explain why fhe blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the
new construction or addition are consistent v�ith the existing structure's design and
wifh the existing streef and neighborhood.
S-e.� a�����d,
2, Explain how fhe variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations
of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the exisfing structure,
street and neighborhood.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with fhe residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
4. Explain how the removal of any trees locafed wifhin the footprint of any new
structure or addition is necessary and is consisient wifh the city's reforestation
requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain
why this mitigaiion is appropriate.
Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM
City Of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit Application
Length of Accessory Structure
In summary we are adding many architectural features to the garage as the garage
sidewall is a border to the rear yard. The architectural features that we are adding
are side doors and dormers. Our goal is to make the garage appearance more
pleasing.
In addition the dormer windows will face into my yard and will be opposite of my
neighbor. I believe that these would create less chance for instruction on to
neighboring properties than would sky lights.
1. The garage is being built in the same vicinity/area as the original garage. It is
located in the back of the lot next to neighbor garages.
a. Public Health
There will be no sanitation, sewer discharge, no water supply
issues as there will be no running water or garbage storage
area in, on, or near the structure
b. Public Safery
i. The new configuration will allow for easier access to the rear
of the lot for all public safety professionals. An alarm will be
installed and no hazardous materials or work will be
conducted inside garage
c. General Welfare
The social benefit is that it will allow for easier access to open
and usable areas of the lot
d. Convenience
i. The general public will not have access to this private
residence garage
2. The garage complies with Burlingame general plans and ordinances.
3. The new garage will allow for more usable open space as the lot is currently
constricted in the back where the garage is currently located. More usable
open area will be created.
a. The proposed garage aesthetics is consistent with existing homes in
the area and was designed to blend into the existing home and
adjacent home structures.
b. The new garage is in the rear of the lot and does not impact long term
parking
c. The new garage is consistent with the location size, architecture,
orientation with other garages in the general neighborhood
d. The new structure will not change the density or general use pattern
of my home nor the neighborhood. There will be not impact to
parking, traffic.
e. The new garage is consistent with zoning requirements for 3 bedroom
homes in my area.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMITS
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for S ecial
Permit for accessory structure lenqth and reduction in the number of parkinq spaces on site to replace
an existinq two-car detached qaraqe with a detached one-car qaraqe at 1576 Cvpress Avenue, Zoned
R-1, Peter G. Comaroto, 1576 Cvpress Avenue, Burlinqame, CA, 94010, property owner, APN: 028-
295-130;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March
10, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence
that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical
exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (e), which states that construction and location of limited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures including accessory (appurtenant) structures
including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences, is hereby approved.
2. Said Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such Special Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and
recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 10th dav of March, 2014, by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Special Permits
1576 Cypress Avenue
Effective March 20, 2014
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped March 3, 2014, sheets A-1 and A-2, and that any changes to footprint or
floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that the detached garage shall only be used for parking and shall not be used for
accessory living or sleeping purposes;
3. that if the accessory structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the
Special Permits as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become
void;
4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
5. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
. CITY OF BURUNGAME
, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
��;�� ', BURLINGAME, CA 94010
�~"�y�'�, �; PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2014
at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall (ouncil Chambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Special Permits for accessory structure
length and reduction in the number of parking spaces on
site to repla�e an existing two-car detached garage with
a detached one-car gnrage at 1576 CYPRESS AVENUE
zoned R-1. APN 028-295-130
Mailed: Februnry 28, 2014
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
City of Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
if you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUB�.IC HEARING NOTICE
(P/ease refer to other sideJ
' '�,�aIC f5� P� � 1� ,�wW .. � � . -
t �,
.
, r . .. . .1 •`r
:
.
.
A w � P�
�.
., ' � �. . . . . j ��
. ..�-,.�y�, , �. . -
t•
.�...
;_ .
. . .. _ .��.. �.� * 'i - , . , -, . .,�� y(. - . � . .' .. �.� � ��
/ � y � ��y � . .d � fi
r, v� F� 1 S� ,� P iP r'� , j��r,y �
^� « . k , � � .' �� �'.�T; . �#�'%� ��. . {
, '� '
,�'� � � a�
.
�.
. ._
.._,� 3. , . � , .;
. :�p.. q - s ' � .�,,( ...
'.1. � �. - ^� . M�i' �, S
,; . 4 �� � _
.
. . .
�i � . , �,� >,`,.�r �' �� � ��
, � �"' : ' � � ' - :. � 1 . s5r
..,,
_ .;, ,
, ,.... �, �.`�.:.- . �.
�j� 'i �
° '! � . -`�c"�" �.�
r _ ..�. � t . � . � .
...,;: i.
- 1n '�V � ! Y * .(. * �
. 3 ' � _.�'"` �
�� �����y� � yY
�'"'�+� ;� l�, it + , � `"a �. '
.: � `-
_. _. - c 4 ' ` S. � r. � � �� '
.. x .
.:
u • .;� .� ' _ .. .. �.,,�(�y �'� �� � i��., � ��`1`^
�1' �'
.:�,1► -., �;. � ;. ��J� � ;�; �f
,'. � �` b ..� ` t '
,�"' � � � t' 'S ri� -� ...: �
! d #';,si- y2
. :4 �: k' � y t1 r �� ' �,.� �' ,�y
��_� m rt . . � �. . . ' �j ��� _ :.� ` �
� d{ � @_,. �i •" � { ,�! �c.. � ,y�„� �� {�.
'` ?f�� y.,` � ,�,�, � ���'� ,��' � .:ti d �t`'4`
4 ��� �si w+ r . .
� �� �....n:. ��q�, � , � , ��."' .I J�. �` -
, {� 'y �:. .{' a "'� _� €. J �
'�`�` � �' t y�► �, � ,� •� y,� "'� � , e�"' :�
� ' � � } . �. ! �. � � ` ..Ayq; �.
� � ♦ � � ri.n► 4.,,"`
� " ,e�.� �-;,iK ? � � 'S _ � '��' , `,; �
v�
�,;,.. .- �� � .a ;y i,' ' � _.:• -
p^
.., 4
;; . M�. L..��. ? . - ' '�'� ,:
' .�..� . .� � ,� 4
c'd" �S`p xy � �'�. ..
.t, 'C � �'"'* - . ... j '�`��� � � ;�.
' 4� �� ! '��i '� .��� `��' �`LiF • � i
` " � `+/A� f� • f� � `_ '�!. "� '� � Y�r}..� �� �-..�
.��t:. :;� q ,��a �i, � � �
� �� �: � � � qa- �4 . �' : . ` "�• �c�, - -
� ��� x ,1�,. �, � � �.�. � . � -
,�
,. �
�
� � s, . . � .. �
` � '-
0 . , ,. ..• . •
.
`
. �. .. � .
�: t�; � �: ... ,� — .`'`�' a . #• � ' { �
. � � � 3 - ,� � .
a �' �,.
�1M�"� � � �' ,� � A� ^ t y . '� �'
. a � ^ .�
.:,,s * ,. � .>
'�-, -Yr'' :; ' ` � `'� �
..� � � . . h i M�I��. � ` . ,y1�: j.
-
,� r �;; �: � y. . �., ,*f. _ � �f '
�� A 'i y f ' r �r r �, � �.�' . i°4'.
�r�, t
�'r �1!' R �it ` �' » 'I Rr3 "r �,a �
; �' � ''-� � �° � ,�rp ^
% + � i � . � Y�r`���'� I
. .. '�+ .. ....., ^w. •, .;.} `. ^� } L� ^��
c�.�'� . � � . .. � .}' � �: �. y,
�' ` � # 1'' . . . F� -�t �. � - i�• ,
��� � ';.` . e `"�,,s ,, �` a�'�� �, s' �,� �#, .'��" `.
.. : . . � t p� �.��,x,"�e, y : '' _ ` '�. .h .
' ,o," ,�.� , � ,'j �````�`'�: • � d r r� � ^ ,$�' � O
, , �
• � �� e�� ��� ` r,k�? i ` ,r ����� ` . �., �` �'
. �y,.
� X'
�" d . • ' �•�. `�''� 1 *
. .: ..
, '` � ��r�� ,��' ,�.:�. � � �„ � �r
- � � ,. .�- �-
�.. ��
� �� �� y�' � �{, ''•ti- �. � ` ..r
i ^' f "`'f x '�� �� _��" IF�'�+�� '8
. . �� . � � : � i��� ���� s
. .
. , .
.. . �
, �; : , �., � ,y. ��� .
_ ,;,.
�. w.... . . _ ��� �. �, � : � �„�,t�t `,.
�, „ �, , : ��
, ' �x �z �� �''i+, r' y, :
�r.. - �t,�.. g . �>' • '€ t +. �kS-.
� "Y � .w �.,y��� � :%� �,.a�. �:�
� _1. , , ���yr .�� �^ '� y
1i , ih ,i r ��
N• Jf� J �`� s4 �1 �% � .. � Lt . t�. �� ` .
�q.M✓ . ( �. �ti ��-- . Y- . .�� � ; . R � . ` " Y• � � �'.�'r
'�Ri�� V y' ~ �y L � , �� �
� � :��1��+ •�* �� � ���.� . T�� t '
_ � .i�.. /!` . ..� � ti ` ..� ��i :.11
"S. : � � ' 'If�:�6'J�IiG. � • .� �� .:��k �
� � ��� sJ '�4;��, � � � � ,s / ��
' � � - C r. • , ` .c'-4�� ..
�J� � ����, :;� �iG.'�F;,-��- ,r:r �.s.�..v.• 't t�i`�/.
g .".