The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1556 Cypress Avenue - Staff ReportItem No. 8e Regular Action Item ,��,.� ;A;rl�''' �_c. f�� 'A �+1� �' ��'�� . . ;,.�.w.�^ �-;Ga� r � k� �i c. � �� Y � ' �. ��C� _;r y �--�� . �., �� ! , � �� `� �., __ - -- r, + 5 � "� }`�F�^ '�'}" �y � � ��' M1 . ;,�, �';✓ :r�f=`�_'� `�S �''�'` �' .. 'r':I \ \ � t_�, i��l� .`.,. � '1. � : . ! '�.. � � �. ' � ��.�. ` � ,�, ' � � � \ :'} . . • �1�4 �� .�:� � 3. ' �* � .�1 � � ';fi��,� " '$ . ,} h 1 Y � �� ,} , y{ r�' �� : s : +f ry,'- Tq.��A J _ �� 'R �:s`��'�H � "'S . ,, , � �{ � 3 i + ,� . i� � „� ��;� „'1 , � .�i ��E'l.�r,�;, � � �! � � °" � =h �, a' $ ,, s.� ,��, � i % � �,.�;��'+� � � , 1'„ '� �a�' , ;�.�y,� :., .t, � ,'�+i " � ��1 �� :5 _ -- � 1 _ ��" r'�� l'� r,-r. j . , ,w�� "�•. .r -� _ , _ � ; � �, � �� :,: _ :' ,, �>. - �' ��" � ��i:s�� ::�� ' �:�t �:{�.i' ��r��'4" .. I � -� . � 4 - �� .,, ;.: .�, . ; t � . ' �� ' � ��C _. - '` �� Sr • - t . � � M,rr �. � { � fyC.,1�'�►',.. r, � .:'�+�� i'..��'A��y�l�.� .... v �:�'.. � - , . . ,� . � {i<+ �,.��:�4,1, � �..�:MX� �} . � ,yi ', � - - . a.• PROJECT LOCATION 1556 Cypress Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1556 Cypress Avenue Item No. 8e Regular Action Item Meeting Date: October 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form+One APN: 028-295-080 Property Owners: Kasey and Bill Schuh Lot Area: 7,500 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated July 16, 2019. The results of the evaluation concluded that 1556 Cypress Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot and contains an existing two-story house with a detached garage. The applicant is proposing a first floor addition at the front of the house (39 SF) and at the rear of the house (174 SF). The existing second floor will be demolished and rebuilt with a new 1,398 SF second floor. The existing detached garage will be replaced with a new 461 SF detached garage in the same location on the lot. The proposed house and detached garage will total 3,873 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,900 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed. With this application, the number of bedrooms will be decreasing from five to four (proposed first floor office does not qualify as a bedroom because one of its wall is open by more than 50%). Two off-street parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The detached garage provides two covered parking spaces (20'-1" x 20'-1" clear interior dimensions) and an uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway leading to the garage. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. At the front of the house is a protected size Victorian box tree that is in fair to poor condition. An arborist report prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, dated June 27, 2019 (included within the plans), recommends that the tree be heavily irrigated twice a month in order to supplement missing nutrients and to improve its condition. Located at the rear right corner of the property is an Evergreen Pear tree that is in fair condition. Though it is far from the proposed work, the arborist report recommends fencing at the dripline to discourage storage of work equipment underneath the Evergreen Pear tree during project construction. In addition to the two existing on-site trees to remain, a third tree (Japanese Maple) is proposed near the rear property line. The applicant is requesting the following application: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010(a)(2)). Design Review 1556 Cypress Avenue Lot Area: 7,500 SF EXISTING Plans date PROPOSED 1556 Cypress Avenue imped: October 16, 2019 ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS _ _ _ _ _ __ __ . _ __ Front (1st flr): 19'-6" , 29'-10" 20'-6" (block average) (2nd flr): 42'-6" 39'-8" ' 20'-6" (block average) _ _ __ ......... __ _.._...._ _ _ _ _ _. __... _ Side (left): 10'-3" No change 4'-0" (r�ght)� 4�'� �� 4'-� " 4'-0,. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.__. ......... Rear (1st f/r): 64'-10" 63'-4" 15'-0" _ __ (2nd flr): 70 5" 61'-10" 20' 0" _ . ........ _ __ , _ _ . __ Lot Coverage: 2,330 SF 2,543 SF 3,000 SF 31.1 % 33.9% 40% __ __ _ _ _ . _ __ , __ __._ FAR: 3,031 SF 3,873 SF 3,900 SF' 0.40 FAR 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR _ .._ : ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ ...._ _ _ _ ... # of bedrooms: 5 4 --- _.._ .. ... _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _....__ .......... Off-Street Parking: 2 covered 2 covered (18'-4" x 18'-4" clear (20'-1" x 20'-1" clear 1 covered (10' x 20') + interior) + 1 uncovered interior) + 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') __ ._ _ __ _.._... __ _ . _. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Building Height: 25'-5" 29'-11" 30'-0" _ _ _........ :........ _. _ _ __ DH Envelope: not applicable complies using window enclosure exception along ; CS 25.26.075 right side of house ' (CS 25.26.075 (b)(2)) ' ' (0.32 x 7,500 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,900 SF (0.52 FAR) Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials: • Windows: existing living room windows to remain/refurbished; all other existing windows to be replaced with new wood clad windows • Doors: wood clad � Siding: stucco • Roof: diamond shaped architectural asphalt � Other: wood gable ends; steel railing (rear elevation, second floor master bedroom); brick chimney; decorative brackets (material unknown) Staff Comments: The revised changes on the plans, date stamped October 16, 2019, do not impact the building footprint, floor area ratio, or setbacks; the changes made were only to architectural details. 2 Design Review 1556 Cypress Avenue Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on September 9, 2019, the Commission had suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached September 9, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below is a summary of the Commission's comments: • Front Elevation o brackets below addition above covered porch appear too small because there is no change in plane; would like to see substantive change in plane in order for the bracket detail to work; o chimney is currently not shown on the front elevation when it should be — please revise in the drawings; • Right Side Elevation o sculpted walls of the upper fa�ade at the rear and at the front are not reflected on the plans as they are on the 3D — would like to see a substantive thickness to the wall (at least 8 inches), please note on plans; o sloped stucco surface feels like a patch solution, please revisit; • Wavy wood siding o note on drawings if it is to be painted, stained, or both; o provide photos of example projects using the material; • Brick chimney o note on drawings that brick is being extended; • Detached Garage o note on drawings what the horizontal element is above the garage door, they wanted to understand if it is a track for the barn door and if there is a separate pocket door. Please refer to the applicanYs response letter (attached), dated October 11, 2019, and revised plans, date stamped October 16, 2019, for a full response to the Planning Commission's suggestions. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (combination of hip and gable roofs, proportional plate heights, wood gable ends, wood clad windows and doors, and stucco siding) is compatible with the existing house and character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties. Therefore, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped 3 Design Review October 16, 2019, sheets T1.0, A1.0, AR through A5.0, A9.0 and G2.0; 1556 Cypress Avenue 2. that the 64 SF (6'-9" x 9'-5") uncovered balcony (second floor) at the rear of the house shall not be covered, unless covering or enclosing this area does not exceed the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR) or there is approval of a Variance for exceeding the maximum allowed FAR; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting 4 Design Review 1556 Cypress Avenue framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Tim Raduenz, Form+One, applicant and designer Kasey and Bill Schuh, property owners Attachments: September 9, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter to the Commission, dated October 11, 2019 Application to the Planning Commission Arborist Report, prepared by Kielty Arborist Services LLC, dated June 27, 2019 (included in the plans) Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 18, 2019 Area Map Separate Attachments: Historical Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated July 16, 2019 5 ITY � ,; � I ¢` �:�', �� , � �� , 0 tiqo � e° 4pORniF City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, September 9, 2019 7:00 PM Council Chambers d. 1556 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage. (Tim Raduenz, Form+One, applicant and designer; Kasey and Bill Schuh, property owners) (112 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1556 Cvpress Ave - Staff Report 1556 Cvpress Ave - Attachments 1556 Cvpress Ave - Historic Resource Evaluation 1556 Cvpress Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Associate Planner Kolokihakaufisi provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Comaroto opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > There is color noted for shutters. Are there shutters? (Raduenz: That is accent and something we took off ) > Does not see a change in plane in the area over the arches. The brackets project but there is not enough change in plane to provide the needed depth. (Raduenz: Noted.) > Show sculpted lines in the elevation, not just the rendering. Needs to be subsfantive, not just a 2 x 4 thickness. (Raduenz: We will do a complete detail of that.) > Top of the sloping wall does not seem to fit, needs to be worked out. (Raduenz: We can put some work into that.) > Will more brick be added to the chimney? (Raduenz: Likely to add brick and paint it.) > Should chimney also be showing on the front elevation? (Raduenz: Will add it.) > What is the thinking behind the siding pattern? (Raduenz: It is a European style. It can be painted, or lots of times it is stained. It isn't seen often, but didn't want to do stucco. I can provide some photos of examples.) > What is the horizontal element above the garage door? (Raduenz: Sliding barn door.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Vice Chair Kelly c/osed the public hearing. City of Burlingame page 1 Printed on 10/2M2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 9, 2019 Commission Discussion: > Addition works well with the structure. Glad to see a home being added onto rather than replaced. > It's a great project, though the siding is unusual. > There are examples of similar siding in Burlingame. Commissioner Sargent made a application return on the Regular The motion carried by the following vote Absent: 1 - Tse motion, seconded by Commissioner Loftis, to have the Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. City of Burlingame page y Piinted on 10/24/2019 Form + One 4843 Silver Springs Drive Park City, UT 84098 p+ 415.819.0304 E + tim�a,formonedesign.com TRANSMITTAL FORM To: City of Burlingame From: Tim Raduenz Subject: 1556 Cypress Ave. Date Sent: 10/11/2019 Number of Pages: 1 Response to Design Review Comments: Front Elevation: 1. Confirmed and re-designed the wall area to accept the bump out as shown on the elevations. 2. Added the chimney to the front elevations Right Side Elevation: l. Redesigned the sloped stucco areas on the design, see attached updated design concepts, think this works better as a whole design. Wavy Siding: l. We decided to go to stucco to play it save.... 1 have included a wood siding photo and its context is in a more English/European home, we will make a decision in the field and if we change back to original we will ask the commission for its blessing, we are now afraid of using it. Brick Chimney: l. We added the note about the chimney being extended and designed to be in right portion, as currently it's not designed correctly. Detached Garage: 1. Added notes to garage door system, also we finished the building approval on this project, the owners started this with another designer and i finished the process in building. To that end, we believe we have an approvable project and hope to move forward with the building phase of this project. Best, Tim Raduenz — CGBP � Build It GREEN MEMBER Form + One • Design & Planning • 4843 Silver Springs Drive• Park City • UT • 84098 •(ais) 819.0304 • tim@formonedesign.com �� P�ANNING APPLICAI ION BURLINGAME � � � � i � ' ; . � i'� ��f�� . `,I ;. , � I � - °�' � �� 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 2ND FLOOR BURLINGAME, CA 94010 3997 �3D� TEL: 650.558.7250 � FAX: 650.696.3790 � E-MAIL: PLANNINGDEPT�v.BURLINGAME.ORG z c Q � v O � z � �: � 0 v 2 z C E— < � � C z � G ,� � � < 1556 CYPRESS AVENUE 028-295-080 R-� PROJFC' ADDRESS ASSESSOR'SPARCEL#(APNI 70NING PRUJEC� DFSCRIPTIOh DEMOLITION OF (E) ROOF, RENOVATION OF (E) SECOND FLOOR, ADDITION TO REAR OF HOME AND TO FRONT OF HOME, (N) ROOF BILL & KASEY SCHUH 1556 CYPRESS AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PROPERTY OWhER f�A"�1F APPLICANT7 ADDRFSS 650-219-0282 BSCHUH@GMAIL.COM KASEYSCHUH@GMAIL.COM PHONE E MAII TIM RAD N 4843 SILVER SPRINGS DRIVE, PARK CITY, UT 84098 ARCNITE(��'DESIGh'ER X APPLICI�fv�-':' ADDRI SS 415-819-0304 TIM@FORMONEDESIGN.COM PEONE F MAI� 24809 BLRIJNGAME BUSINE�_SS UCFNSE � 'FOR PROJECT RF F UNDS' - Please provide an address to which to all refund checks will be mailed to: ��. Gv4-'k l:�,C- v� sl�l I�--�^ ��S'L� C(a (� 12 C S �rG v� wL_ (� V✓�. l n S c....c. �. f� �l. i J � C� f�AME WDDRFSS I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY �; KNOWLEDGE AND BELI�F. � � ` 5113119 z � ;1,-. � "�`'-'� � APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (IF DIFFERENT FROM PROPERTY OWNERI DA`E C — C I AM AWARE OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ABOVE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION TO THE > PLANNING COMMISSION/DIVISION. � �_ _ �- s l � 31 �� Q PROPERTY OWNER'S 31GNATURE DATF . t __ �' .,,., AU f HO�;ILA l I0N I O�f_f'�;0�)'JCE P', A�'VS I HEREBY GRANT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THE AUTHORITY TO REPRODUCE UPON REQUEST ANDIOR POST PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AS PART OF THE PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS AND WAIVE ANY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO SUCH ACTION �� (INI� IALS l)F ARCF',I�� I(: � iDFSIC;NI 11i � z O � V) � i Q ci � APPI IC� �ION "YPE ❑ ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ❑ VARIANCE (VAR) ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) ❑ WIRELESS �DESIGN REVIEW (DSR) ❑ FENCE EXCEPTION ❑ HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ❑ OTHER: ❑ MINOR MODIFICATION ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) � �. ,<� ► o r �� , . � c/� e. . , .. . _, r, y �- T � C L7 r- O 'i OF �l.;i;L3?'vC:.r''�' . z DA'E KE Cf IVCD: ��-P'..A:"�!;��Fvv �'r' � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for an application for Desiqn Review for a first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq. at 1_556 Cvpress Avenue, Zoned R-1 Kasev and Bill Schuh propertv owners APN� 025-201-090; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 28, 2019, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairperson �, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th dav of October, 2019, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1556 Cypress Avenue Effective November 7, 2019 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 16, 2019, sheets T1.0, A1.0, AR through A5.0, A9.0 and G2.0; 2. that the 64 SF (6'-9" x 9'-5") uncovered balcony (second floor) at the rear of the house shall not be covered, unless covering or enclosing this area does not exceed the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR) or there is approval of a Variance for exceeding the maximum allowed FAR; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, placed upon the private prop Director; debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be rty, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development 6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1556 Cypress Avenue Effective November 7, 2019 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFARTMENT BUR��ricAr�E 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �'��ag BURLINGAME, CA 94010 '-�'��"�� PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 - www.burlingame.org Site: 1556 CYPRESS AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2019 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall [ouncil Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single fami�y dwelling and new detached garage at 1556 CYPRESS AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028.295.080 Mailed: October 18, 2019 (Pfease refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE �itv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Deveiopment Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Galifornia. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence deiivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Kevin Gardiner, AICP Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other sideJ 1556 Cypress Avenue 300' noticing APN #: 028.295.080 ti � " u j/ " u;�� v� v > � fl�c�',C' �E��' 7��U �� ta �� q��q � fi{?;:� ��a3 �� , r�� ,��,� U pt�' �� ts 4J - ��. � . , �� r � �� a�� ?�Q. � �,�� ; �� pa�� ' ��, � ��U � ��'�' � Q�QO �� ,c��' c� ��''`� ��3 � '� �3� n � '� • � Ca � �7 �� ' C:W b �FJ�j .., � �� t; �. FICj . . � ��, ' , , Q��c� � �� c� O fI � : � � � � �� ,�.-.�.,� � ,��' � � � � �7�3��, ,. ��'C� t�� n� � � / ta � � ta `�Q . ``° ?Jic?Q� c,►� �vG� � � �� Q�� 1 � 0�� J��. �1�� G� � � �� , Q a�3 . J �.��-' �c.�y ��,�� p�� f1�. �a b �, � � � ��dfi ♦��.• �C� WG� l a�i�� p�� p�,�� '�t� � y,r,,' ,��a �� i.� p�� a�,� ��, � n� it�,,�•'� � �� c � aa � � �� , �� ,�• , �� a Q� 4�� a�� yb�� ` , s' �� r�� ^�� C1� .� • � Q +% �Q�} ��4 ,, �1 �� fl� �^�: � �•'►� d� �.� � ,a � � �Q 4 �' � �°� �` ` �'' �� ' �y� � �� 3 . �' � � � a� � �,i . � % ��Q �• � �� O ��, �43� q��} �� t�� `�r• g p� � �� p �.,_ . qrUb �1�G �Q� �.4�d *,''�* - �' � o .t'� q�� o �� ,�`'��` �� q� �p � /� n a . �� t:� �; 4�.!' � �� 53�� O � ~ � A4� . d c� pc� ,��1.� � � � � �•,•��'� 4c�Q fl .r; Q �� ;�� "' .,, • _ +� � b � ,� � � G' ,, �`�� _. �_ Sb� ...A F . � �,