Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1517 Cypress Avenue - Staff ReportItem # 'rJ f�"' Consent Calendar PROJECT LOCATION 1517 Cypress Avenue City of Burlingame One YeaY Extension of Design Review Item # ,� Consent Calendar Address: 1517 Cypress Avenue Meeting Date: 09/25/06 Request: One year extension of an approved design review project for a second story addition. Applicant/ Property Owner: Michael Ginn APN: 02�-301-280 Designer: Holdren . Lietzke Design Lot Area: 5,775 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The applicants are applying for a one year extension of an approved design review project for a second story addition approved by regular action calendar on August 8, 2005. The original approval for the project was for design review, parking variance, side setback variance and conditional use permit for a second story addition and new detached garage (August 8, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes). On August 18, 2006 a Building Permit was finaled for construction of the new detached garage, which required the original parking variance for substandard uncovered parking space length; the side setback variance for 0' proposed, where 5'-0" is the minimum requirement; and the conditional use permit for distance between an accessory structure and another structure on the same lot. Because the detached garage was built and was finaled by the Building Department, this application applies only to a one year extcnsion of the approval of the second story addition only. A reduced copy of the originally approved plans is attached to the staff report for review. Originally, this project was not referred to a design review consultant. The Planning Commission approval of this application became effective on August 18, 2005. This approval is valid for a period of one year during which time a building permit must be issued for the approved construction. An extension for up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission. If the extension is not granted, the property owner must reapply and the project will be subject to design review. An extension of the variances and conditional use permit is not needed because the Building Permit for the garage was finaled on August 18, 2006. In a letter dated August 14, 2006, the applicant notes that because of financial restrictions, the project is going to be completed in phases. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a one year extension only of the design review approval for the second story addition to August 18, 2007. Project Summary: The existing two-story house, with a newly constructed detached one-car garage, contains 2,528.5 SF (0.44 FAR) of floor area, has three bedrooms and is located on a triangular shaped lot. The applicant is proposing to add onto the existing second floor master bedroom and build a new closet. The proposed second story addition would total 129 SF. With the proposed second story addition, the floor area will increase from 2,528.5 SF (0.44 FAR) to 2,657 SF (0.46 FAR) where 3,194 SF (0.55 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 537 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will not increase (three). One covered (10' x 20') and one uncovered (9' x 20') parking spaces are required for the three bedroom house. The existing detached one-car garage (11'W x 19'-6"D clear interior dimensions) was demolished and replaced with a new detached one-car garage (10'W x 20'D clear interior dimensions) which meets the covered One Year Extension of Design Review I S 17 Cypress Avenue parking requirement. A variance for the uncovered (9' x 15'-0") space was approved as part of the original application. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The following application is required: • Design review for a second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 5). Table 1 —1517 Cypress Avenue i n+ A�-o.�. C^l^1C CTi ✓' / /J ✓ EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D (with new garage) ' SETBACKS Front (1 S`): 15'-0" (to garage) no change 15'-0" (2„d): 27'-3" 25'-1 " 20'-0" _ _ . . . ........... _.__.. _.._.... :.... _ ......... _.... . .. __... _.. _. Side(right): 7'-10" no change 5'-0" (left).�..... . . 0'..�to garage).�... _ no change...._.. : _5�_��� Rear (IS`flr.): Triangular shaped lot, ; Triangular shaped lot, ; 15'-0" (2"d flr): no rear �ro�erty line � no rear property line 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,056 SF ' 2310 SF 36% no change 40% _ _ ................ _.... _ __.. . : _ . . . . _ __ ._ .. : __ FAR: 2,528.5 SF 2,657 SF 3194 SFZ 0.44 FAR 0.46 FAR 0.55 FAR � # of bedrooms: 3 3 --- ___... _... _.... : ___._.. � Parki�ig: 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') � (10' x 20') 1 uncovered no change 1 uncovered (9' x 15'-0")� (9' x 20') __..... .. _ ___ __ :. _ : _ ___ . Heiglzt: 25'-0" 27'-6" 30'-0" _ ___ _ _ ___ ___ _ . ___ _ ._ _ ...... _... DHEnvelope: complies complies CS 25.28.075 �� , ., , � �iuc ��wa�n vaiiaii�c a��ivvcu r�u�u�� o, t,vw. Z (0.32 x 5,775 SF) + 1100 SF + 246 = 3,194 SF (0.55 FAR) 3 Parking variance approved August 8, 2005. Staff Comments: See attached. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2 One Year Extension of Design Review 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 1517 Cypress Avenue 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for Design Review: Based on facts that the design review project has already been approved at this location, that the previously approved detached garage which required two variances and a conditional use permit has already been constructed and finaled by the Building Department, that this requested extension is only for the 129 SF second story addition, and based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's August 8, 2005, Regular Action meeting, the project is found to be compatible with the current requirements of the City's five residential design review guidelines and eligible for a one year extension to August 18, 2007. Planning Commission Action to Extend Permit to August 18, 2007: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 23, 2005, sheets A0.1 thru A3.3; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the the Chief Building Official's January 18, 2005 and August 18, 2006 memos, the City Engineer's January 20, 2005 and August 21, 2006 memos, the Fire Marshall's August 21, 2006 memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's January 24, 2005 and August 21, 2006 memos and shall be met; 3. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 5. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 3 One Yem• Extension of Design Review 1 S 17 Cypress Avenue 6. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erica Strohmeier Zoning Technician c. Michael Ginn, applicant and property owner 4 City of Burlingame Planriing Gorrarraissiort Mirtutes August 8, 2005 second floors, or garage, which would j,�fude adding or enlarging a dor�r(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features��'changing the roof height or p.itch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3) that pri�`tb scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional,�hall provide architectural certificafion that thc architectural details such as window locations and �a�s are built as shown on the app�oved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the pr�j�'�t, the property owner or contr�.etor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certi �ions shall be submitted to the $�iilding Department; 4) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspe � n, a licensed surveyor shall sh�ot"the height of the roof ridge and provide certi cation of that height e Building Department; 5. tha�'priar to final inspection, Planning Departmen ff will inspect an te compliance of the architect��l details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to,v fy that the project s been built according to the a�pl�oved Planning and Building plans; 6) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined�.�ere possible, to a single termination and inst�lled on the portions of the roof not visible from the stree��and that these venting details shall be included-�nd approved in the construction plans before a Buildi� permit is issued; 7) that a fence shall be inst�led along the side property line where the existing gara ls to be removed; 8) that the landscape plan sl�ail be refined to show more detail and shall be brought to e Planning Commission as an information i,tem prior to issuance of a building permit; 9) that the co itions of the Chief Building Official's May 13�; �005, memo, the City Engineer's, Fire shal's and R cling Specialist's May 16, 2005, memos, anc��e NPDES Coordinator's May 19, 200��� shall be ; 10) that the project shall meet all the re irements of the California Building c�Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the Cit Burlingame; 11) that the project 1 comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris R cling Ordinance which requires cted demolition, new construction and alteration proj ects to mit a Waste Reduction plan and m recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a emolition permit; and 12) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-1-2 (C. Deal abstaining and Cers. Brownrigg and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:36 p.m. 5. 1517 CYPRESS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, PARKING VARIANCE, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FIlZST FLOOR REMODEL, SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (MICHAEL GINN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; HOLDREN-LIETZKE DESIGN, DESIGNER) (69 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report August 8, 2005, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mike Ginn, property owner and applicant was available to answer questions. Commissioners noted that the house looks good overall, have no problem with the placement of the garage given the unusual shape of the lot, but want to point out that a portion of the side wall of the garage is shown right on the property line, want to make it clear that the eave cannot project over the property line. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners noted that the variances and conditional uses for the garage could be supported based on the unusual shape of the lot, the applicant has done a good job working with the constraints of the lot. C. Osterling moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 23, 2005, L! City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Augu.ct 8, 2005 sheets A0.1 thru A3.3; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the proj ect, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 5) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 6) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 7) that the conditions ofthe ChiefBuilding Official's January 18, 2005 memo, the City Engineer's January 20, 2005 memo and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's January 24, 2005 memos and shall be met; 8) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 10) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg and Vistica. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:42 p.m. 6. 1556 LOS MONTES DRIVE, D R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION IT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STO DDITION (JONATHAN SUE, SUE ASSOCIA , APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; CHE, TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER j 51 NOTICED P ECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIE `~ Referenc ff report August 8, 2005, with attachme�S"�SP Brooks presented the report, review criteria and s comments. Ten conditions were su��ested for consideration. Chair Auran ope "the public h ng. Jonathon Sue, Sue Associates, p�o�ect architect, was available for questions. Cor}�nissioners noted at the neighbors had expressed conc,�i`n with the roofing material and asked the appl},E�nt to describe what materials are proposed. The app}icant noted that the intent is to use metal shing�es coated with a rough material to look like terra c', and presented a cut sheet describing the materi�al to the Commission. He noted that the metal gles would match the color of the existin vi+ood shingles on the house. Commissioners as if the existing antenna on the roof would remainty��h the proposed addition, and the applicant noted t it is in use and would remain. ,,�' ~ Commis ners noted that they had visited the neighbors acr the street and next door observing the views from i ide their homes, there is no problem with the g e end from the house across the street, but the view would be obstructed from the house next door. missioners asked if the applicant would consider lowering this portion of the roof to a 3/12 pitch. T applicant noted that the 6/12 pitch on the gable end portion could be eliminated and a 3/12 pitch roo ncorporated to match the other roof pitches. 5 G�,�. . ( � `�`= City of Burlin�ame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.orQ �r�. cirr o� �.�E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �� � Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: APPLICANT Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (w): �5i� �UP�ss ���� PROPERTY OWNER ' Name: %4'y I C � �t 'L V . �� I ►� ►V� � Address: l S� � C y�(? �SS �Av"� (h): ��� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �(`iU�(��/.; Lr�TZK� Address: �4 l�LV�I���U ST, City/State/Zip: !�� �N'T� (�.� . (�A ���� �{ (� Phone (w):T� � 4c( - (s� C� I City/State/Zip: ��PJ� N(�4tM.0 , CL} `�'�C �C Phone (w):�j��� � `� 2 - 3� SU �fl� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. RECEI��D c�: AUG 1 4 2006 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT DE5CRIPTION: Q�i��t L(� P�l�}l �S AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: �S ( I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature:-- („��Li�'vL_/��`� Date: ' < �`I(� Date submitted: PCAPP. FRM C1(�����C��r�on �r c'�rv2 -�eG r �,�' �S►a'� I �-� a ^ 1 1 rv�r ci al.�s� �-� rev�'r � oP�O! �' c�.-h'o �. �I v � � rW � ' � 1 �J �� Michael Ginn 1517 Cypress Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 To: Burlingame Planning Department August 14, 2006 RECEIVED AU G 1 4 2006 C�TY OF BURLINGAME piANNING DEPT. The plans currently for 1517 Cypress Avenue were to be completed in phases depending on monetary restrictions. The garage has been completed, the upstairs improvements are being considered for spring 2007. �� Michael Ginn City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org � � �'`b"� Type of apphcahon APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Design Review � Condihonal Use Permrt Vanance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: I 5� � CyP�C—SS �l-vE APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER � Name: �IC��L �1 �N Name: 5�1� Address: f51� �`�P��SS /'�� City/State/Zip: �U�1.11J G�WVI Ca Cl� q�f U! 0 Phone (w): �(,o�� ��� - lab�. �h�. ((��� 5sf�- �t(�55 c�: Cl�so� 342 - aq � q ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �LD2F�1- LlE i ZKe DES(C�� Address: �� -1�LV�A2fFA0 SUrrE L3 Address: AS City/State/Zip: �PPLI Ci4� Phone (w): �--�� (h): (fl� City/State/Zip: IMoNT�2� V, C�l. �3 �`f-� Please indicate with an asterisk * Phone (w): (���� Cv4-q-(�DOI the contact person for this project. ch�: RECEIVED (�= C�i) (Q�hR-lrloo3 JAN 1 8 2005 CITY OF BURLINC,AME pLANNING DEPT• PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SECUN� 5�12� iC�N(O��L AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: �_,��/v Date:�� D.S I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: �_.-�� i� � Date: l � Os Date submitted: PCAPP.FRM Project Comments Date: To: From August 17, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for one-year extension of an approved design review application at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 301-280 Staff Review: August 21, 2006 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: 01 /18/2005 � City Engineer X Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fi�e Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Request for design review for a second story addition and first floor remodel at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-301-280 01 /24/2005 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 3) Provide guardrails at all landings. 4) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than two risers. 5) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 6) The fireplace chimney must terminate at feast two feet above any roof surface within ten feet. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. � te: ��j�a,1� � � Project Comments Date: To: From: August 17, 2006 [� City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for one-year extension of an approved design review application at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 301-280 Staff Review: August 21, 2006 1. All previous comments apply. Reviewed by: V V Date: 8/21/2006 Date: Project Comments 01 /18/2005 To: d City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Subject: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Request for design review for a second story addition and first floor remodel at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-301-280 Staff Review: 01 /24/2005 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V ��� Date: 1/20/2005 Project Comments Date: To: From: August 17, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for one-year extension of an approved design review application at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 301-280 Staff Review: August 21, 2006 While the project appears to not require sprinklers based upon proposed addition and remodel, the project is close. Be advised where more than one (1) addition and/or alteration for which building permits are required are made within a two (2) year period and said alterations are made to the premises of the same occupant. In such circumstances, the sum of these additions and/or alterations construction costs during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for the purpose of calculating the replacement cost value formula. Final determination will be made and the plan review phase of the project. It is very important that you understand the threshold indicated by BMC §17.04.030. Designer, contractor, and owner should communicate specifically the extent of demolition and remodel. Keeping in mind any change orders and addendums which increase the total amount of square footage added or remodeled after plan review would be applied to the sprinkler ordinance. Reviewed by: ,� � Date: Z,��G Project Comments Date: To: From: August 17, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for application for one-year extension of an approved design review application at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 301-280 Staff Review: August 21, 2006 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projecfs prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: d' Date: �/a / � � Project Comments Date: 01 /18/2005 To: � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal � NPDES Coordinator Request for design review for a second story addition and first floor remodel at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-301-280 01 /24/2005 Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: �------ Date: I —�� � Z, S— Date: Project Comments August 17, 2006 To: � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney Subject: Request for application for one-year extension of an approved design review application at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 301-280 Staff Review: August 21, 2006 Previous comments apply. Reviewed by: �� Date: 08/21 /06 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: 01 /18/2005 � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney � Recycling Specialist � Fire hal � NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Request for design review for a second story addition and first floor remodel at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-301-280 01/24/2005 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Additional stormwater requirements may be issued as conditions of approval for this project. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. �. Reviewed by: �� �� Date: O�(dcf[DS RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND ONE YEAR EXTENSION RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a one year extension of an approved design review for a second story addition at 1517 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1, Michael Ginn, propertv owner, APN: 085-301-280; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 25, 2006, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the stiuctures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said one year extension of design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such one year extension of design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of September , 2006 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and one year extension of design review. 1517 Cypress Avenue Effective October 5, 2006 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 23, 2005, sheets A0.1 thru A3.3; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's January 18, 2005 and August 18, 2006 memos, the City Engineer's January 20, 2005 and August 21, 2006 memos, the Fire Marshall's August 21, 2006 memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's January 24, 2005 and August 21, 2006 memos and shall be met; 3. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 5. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 6. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and one year extension of design review. 1517 Cypress Avenue Effective October 5, 2006 10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. a� cYrr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME '� PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ' .: `� ' � TEL: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-379D e r.i�", �i� � ' www.burlingame.org _ _ rx� � �� = �.=�rn , -�- F���. ' �,°, 'n:��=�:'t�?,�'� � _ _ ,�,:,, Site: 1517 Cypress Avenue "" The [ity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the follawing public hearing on Monday, September 25, 2006 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for one-year extensian of an approved design review, parking variance, side setback variance and conditional use permit for a first floor remodel, second story addition and a new detached garage at 1517 (ypress Avenue zoned R-l. (APN 028-301-280) Mailed: September 15, 2006 (Pl�ase rPfc�r to othe�- side) : � �� „���.� � �; _ � nta?e. ' .. . ,. ,,. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at ihe Pl�inning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property �wners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. � �; ..�i.�i,�.� � �� , � Margaret Monroe g ,���s r �._� . ���° City Planner PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer tn other side) .r ♦ � �I, l. . l * � � ' `'t �� , � �� ♦� � �, r^ • �.�y, � �,� ,�. �,,, , � � i �r A ' O � ^`,.�' sf��'- �, � �� { � ' .; . - � ` �` �c�'�'. � ��: '� .� r -�� . = \� :re. . . ', •-'�p '�'9'^ �.� �` . � � � � . ��-�i q" .. � � t �t . .o 'x �� . i. 1� ��'., � � �- . �. „� � � .,�. �, "� , �.+� , �t., £. �- '� �• // � �:�. � -�,:,, . � . X, � �.- `• - /+� � '�t � � .s . � .�.� �(, )�� ..� �,_ �- �: � ��/ , '� �i'�l V� ��'^l-�' � �i �7����,,.i �f i`�+' _'� • � •�� � • `� "'�` � ` ����'� *.. � �' , � I<Y. �. � :I.. �� 11�'� ,`` ��,r". ' � ��r � � � �� � t 'w . � � �� �� � � ` .. �. ,�� .� �. .�- .� �� q � ,,,,�,�a�. ,,; :� .�. ,�.� ��' � �► � � �: _� � � -'� � �F� . 1' ,. `;, i . �. �: � } , • 5y'.�y.. � �'R j :' p �,}y''yr �,�r 4f;�.:./ : .�tY r . �� k + �f� �:= �fw� u.a'� �„� �,� .' ��di� �� -�_ +i °t . ' � :���► � d�� ., . � `. . �' : .� ' 1`i � . t� c'{i'y ��+`. ..�a� � .) 'I.� - ,. �� � � 9 � q. 1x � ' ' �„� " ��4•� � ..Y ••r� • d' •t.. � i '� .. �1.A. ��+s��!` � � 1 r Y ' �1'r ' �..•�' . i �.. ..(- ! . ' My . L9�h' fl 4 �.. �,t']{✓ r�►.: ' _ �'� ° + �`�a�l �` r t . r w �, . V� �, r�:. , xi �'9�i� �' 7C � � � y„� � , ��t'r��f �r,Z'� ,� . '* _ :.�R' • � �"� � ` °� k- r � a �• � � �,: , A �..7I +.' . ` 'r`'�. V � � t� � , f �y1 N' i� "�M��• wlh y-.{ `��... �_I 1 p �� I .�� � . �r.�� +'���';�. 1����' �7Y"� �� / �., � ti �. � `� �� f+� `�k � ��` i� le+� � ;,�, � �,���. } �� �� � '', y ,� ��.�. , ��,; � ���, _� :� � '":; ► ,�,;, . � .�..�, d - ��. ���� , ti. 1 �� � . * ,--•• � '+til"� �,� � w' � ! � i : �' s!';' r. �� � 4 . 7 1.:�^ . � � , �.. '//j ���� � � .� + . *i' .� Si � � . / • �� • 4 r � r. � 4d' �tlt.� � '� � f4 ,II�'� ' �'•_ � :. ) � {�. i / � � ... .k, l� ���`� . .,.�s .i. d�.-. ;'ri:.tlr � a3( �£.: _ r � f �, t V":' � � -,.. ; S IT � � `� � ' `' ti. M �� ' f:: � M �: { ♦ • GM t //�) ` 1 `. �.. � � 'P.. - I � , t .y'l . !�i[.1� �� - .,� � �� �� ' � � � ``' d�i�i" � � �f,. �• ���' � �� r ,..� � '. /- \ �, ��.. E- . �,¢ t �: . �,�. �'���� .. . ry ry�� � � `,?�. L . . '`7e�. �. � ° , f �,� � , ��'� ���i� r � kY `� �~ �tI � ��y f `; � y ��% • + �'� r '� , 1�. � � '•- � ��i(�iw . F`�i ��a �" � � a'�,# .,�. ._ f r � ' t � ��°�"i � -. ri y � ~ , �. ,'Y�' ���'�' —� ,,y��M 1. �,�;^ '". +' /f . r �,�,�, /' � _,_ il ', . . _ "� ; . �. , -� �.. . � � 4: J � � � ' � ��� �.. . , .��'_ �+� � r+ �� 4 f ra, ,��� � � Y� �• �R"'^"'1-�. ��. �1' +,e.� * • ��, �/' �#i � ' � . .�., • ° ,, „��.,✓ tr � ��t ..� �C� SYx�' � � \ � r � °� /.' iM 1 ' � � , ., , � . .. � - . � y } v � � . � ,/ �2 . � � _ y'� w'�;�'� � ,., �� ' � ��� ..�� � � �� � � ;. *' '`'_'w�. � .-r MY`�ryM� h' c .1 ,� � �� .�` ,�. . L:, ��ir(, � - . �"ir "l `��� �. � h C� �}��, !�"'4S �. �� � � .l, ,,+' � � c�' i � � � � • . . r j�.Y► .' . ya : , � .. ♦ 1, i '. � ,.�i�� � " � 'it ' ,� ��. .'�;. � Y�,: . �.� � ' T .'� .� ,� y;l: ,"+`�\- •.'� �� . t ' �. , �y`° � r 'y � ..+��kf . r ,� ` . ;�, ' ���j e y _ � v.'`� t,i . t� � .,�♦ )'• �� � � � � �• � � � Y ¢� . S ' ��. "�1�: . `�-� n ,,�s, �t� �'` � ,�,`.. � t• � '`tin" 4. � .` � �+: ' } i � � .,y� � � .� � �� `� •� � � n�� v� �S . .1 `� �v , � �,5� F; � ;' •. . � �. r- �r �: ,� ��, � a � - � - - '��. ; •`^�„i . ..� +r� � ,�,. �'� ,i' '�' ` Js ;' _ �=' d �� } 1*�,�5 � 7 - � . � � . �f:: . ._yr:. �� ���' . =•�,4 � s ��� � �� E;;��� �� ��'' r.. , , � , , .. - �, ti. i . . �,- �� . , � ""H..,�.� � ` /y� % � ' ` . ., . .,:'.: A ' , . . , . .• � : . ... / - . .,. . • �jt ♦ .' . r � �: ,` 4' . . � _ (y� �,,,. T�