HomeMy WebLinkAbout1517 Cypress Avenue - Resolution, �
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
2005-164564
10:33am 09l21/Q5 R1 Fee: NO FEE
Count of pages 7
Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
Warren Slocum
Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder
*�I�II '�� I�� _I! I i �I` �. I! � I�'�I ��I �'f IIII �I I �I�
Z,.. �..� J I„� ��'., � .% v ", C'1 �C *
RESOLUTION NO. 081-2005
1517 CYPRESS AVENUE; APN: 028-301-280
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
RECEIVED
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in my office.
OCT 1 8 2005
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
'I
Date: 08/ 19/2005
Ma gare Monroe, ity Planner
RESOLUTION 081-2005
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW,
VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
design review, variances and a conditional use permit for a first and second story addition and
new detached garage at 1517 Cvpress Avenue, zoned R-1, Michael Ginn, property owner APN:
028-301-280;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
AuQust 8, 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per
Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(1) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will
not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the
addition.
2. Said design review, variances and conditional use permit are approved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review,
variances and conditional use permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said
meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certifed copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, �ei{�1�� ��-�tJ�, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission held on the 8`h day of August, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Auran, Cauchi, Deal, Keighran, Osterling
NONE
Brownrigg, Vistica
� �
� � � � , ., �
Secr�ry
/
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, design review, variances and conditional use
permit.
1517 Cypress Avenue
Effective August 18, 2005
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped June 23, 2005, sheets A0.1 thru A3.3; and that any changes to the footprint
or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features
or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall
provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department;
4. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project
has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
5. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department;
7. that the conditions of the the Chief Building Official's January 18, 2005 memo, the City
Engineer's January 20, 2005 memo and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES
Coordinator's January 24, 2005 mcmos and shall be met;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm
Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and
California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.