The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About463 Cumberland Drive - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Address: 463 Cumberland Road Item No. 8b Action Item Meeting Date: September 22, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Una Kinsella Property Owners: Brian and Barbara Kott General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 029-163-070 Lot Area: 5,750 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. History and Proposed Amendment to Design Review: An application for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road was approved by the Planning Commission on June 23, 2014 (June 23, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued in August 2014 and construction is underway. The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review for the changes listed below. Please refer to the applicant's letter dated September 9, 2014 for a full explanation and rationale for the proposed changes. Increase the size of the kitchen by 30 SF on the first floor at the rear, center of the house (see revised Site Plan, Proposed Main Level Plan and Proposed Rear and Right Side Elevations). The proposed lot coverage would increase to 27.3% (1,572 SF) where 40% (2,300 SF) is the maximum allowed. The proposed floor area ratio would increase to 2,809 SF (0.49 FAR) where 2,940 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed). The proposed addition complies with side and rear setback requirements. 2. Eliminate the previously proposed new window along the right side of the house in the dining room (see revised Proposed Main Level Floor Plan and Proposed Right Side Elevation). 3. Replace the existing fixed window (containing no grids) in the living room at the front of the house with new double-hung windows with grids to match existing and new windows (see revised Proposed Front Elevation). 4. Revised window grid pattern to match existing grid pattern (see revised building elevations). Project Description (based on original approval): The existing split level house and attached single-car garage contains 2,121 SF (0.37 FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The design review application approved by the Planning Commission in June 2014 included a first and second story addition at the front and rear of the house. With the proposed project, there was an increase in the floor area from 2,121 SF (0.37 FAR) to 2,779 SF (0.48 FAR) where 2,940 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project was 161 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 5% of the maximum allowed FAR. The first floor wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it is set back 2'-10" where 4'-0" is the minimum required. The applicant requested a Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor wall along the right side property line at the front and rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required). Design Review Amendment 463 Cumberland Road The second story wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it encroaches into the declining height envelope by 47 SF (3'-6" x 13'-6"). The applicant requested a Special Permit for declining height envelope to extend the existing second story wall at the front and rear of the house. The new wall will encroach into the declining height envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0"). The existing house contains four bedrooms (the existing utility room behind the garage qualifies as a bedroom because it is enclosed and measures 70 SF in area). With the project, there was no increase in the number of bedrooms (the existing utility room will be converted to laundry room, relocating the washer and dryer from the garage). Therefore, two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, were required on site for a four-bedroom house. The existing attached garage provides one covered parking space (10' x 18' clear interior dimensions provided where 10' x 18" is the minimum required for an existing garage). One uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The following applications were approved by the Planning Commission on June 23, 2014: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2); Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (right side wall of the proposed second floor addition encroaches in to the envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0") (C.S. 25.26.035 (c)); and • Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor wall along the right side property line at the front and rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (c) (1)). 463 Cumberland Road Lot Area: 5,750 SF Plans date stamped: September 10, 2014 EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/REQ'D APPROVAL ' PROPOSAL SETBACKS ' _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ : _ _........ Front (1st flr): 20'-2" 20'-2" ' 20'-1" (block average) (2nd flr): 20'-2" 24'-0° ' no change 20'-1 °(block average) _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Side (left): 5'-0" no change no change 4'-0" (right): 2'-10"' 2'-10" 2 no change 4'-0" _ _.._ _. ...... ; __ _... _......._ .... _ _ _ _ _. Rear (1st flr): 60'-11" 57'-7" 55'-4" 15'-0" (2nd fIr): 60'-11" 57'-7" no change 20'-0" _ _ __ _ _ _ Lot Coverage: 1269 SF 1542 SF 1572 SF 2300 SF 22% 26.8% 27.3% 40% __ __ . __ _ __. . FAR: 2121 SF 2779 SF 2809 SF 2940 SF 3 0.37 FAR 0.48 FAR 0.49 FAR 0.51 FAR ' Existing non-conforming right side setback (2'-10" existing where 4'-0" is required). 2 Side Setback Variance previously approved (2'-10" proposed where 4'-0" is required). 3 (0.32 x 5750 SF) + 1100 SF = 2940 SF (0.51 FAR). Development table continued on next page. � Design Review Amendment 463 Cumberland Road Lot Area: 5,750 SF # of bedrooms: Off-Street Parking: __ _ Height: DH Envelope: EXISTING 3 __ 1 covered (10' x 18') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 28'-6„ _ encroaches 47 SF a (3'-6" x 13'-6") ORIGINAL APPROVAL 5 _ 1 covered (10' x 18') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 29'-10" : encroaches 65 SF 5 (3'-6" x 18'-5") 463 Cumberland Road Plans date stam ed: September 10, 2014 REVISED ALLOWED/REQ'D PROPOSAL no change --- _ _.. _ . . _ __ __ _ ____ _ . 1 covered no change ;(18' x 18' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') _ . __ _ no change 30'-0" no change Special Permit required 4 Existing right side second story wall is non-conforming because it encroaches into the declining height envelope by 47 SF. 5 Special Permit previously approved for right side second story wall of addition to encroach into declining height envelope by 65 SF. Staff Comments: See attached original project memos from the Building, Parks, Fire, Engineering and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 10, 2014 sheets CS, A-3 and A-4 and June 11, 2014, sheets C-1, A-1, A-2 and L-1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3 Design Review Amendment 463 Cumberland Road 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 3, 2014, May 28, 2014 and April 22, 2014 memos, the Parks Division's April 29, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's April 21, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 29, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 4 Design Review Amendment Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Una Kinsella, applicant and architect Brian and Barbara Kott, property owners Attachments: ApplicanYs Explanation Letter, dated September 9, 2014 June 23, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments from Previously Approved Application Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 12, 2014 Aerial Photo 463 Cumberland Road � UMK ARCHITECTURE io33 Paloma Ave Burlingame, CA 94oio umk�_r4h�gmail.4om. / 4�5•73o•i81z 9/9/14 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road, Cr� 94010 Attn: I'lanning Coininissioners Ruben Hurin — Planning Department Re: The Kott Residence 463 Cumberland Road Amendment to Design Review �lppro`-a1 .: ,�-°-�. �= ��,�� , ;i' , _I-;i_�".i;.:�,K;P- �it�,i�P��. ._ The project at �63 Cumberland Rd is in the demolition phase of construction. 'I'he clients, Brian and Barbara Kott are requesrin� some alterarions to the approved plans to improve the proposed Kitchen configuration and adjust some windows for consistency in grid pattern as well as to increase privacy. Please note the following mociifications to the Cover Sheet, Floor Plan Sheet, and �?levarion Sheet by UMK Architecture dated `re�-ised )/8/14' Owner Rec�uested Revision 1. Expand portion of first floor rear wall of Kitchen to increase floor area bv 29?5 SF. This change does not impact rear or sideyard setbacks or Lot coverage or F�R. See Sheets CS, r�3 & �4 Architect's Explanation The proposed Iutchen expansion w�ll allow for a slighdy larger Living Rm, to center the e�sting Fireplace in the room, and to accommodate more functional aisle spaces in the Kitchen. The revision improves the rear wall articulation and adds visual interest on the Rear elevarion. 2. Remove proposed new window along right- side wall of Dining Room. See Sheets A3 & A4 During demolition, it became apparent that the location of the proposed new window would impact privacy between the adjacent neighbor's Living Room and the new open floor plan of the T)ining Room/Ki�chen. `Y'ith the increased glazing along the rear wall of the Dining room, this will not impact natural light or ventilation in the space. 3. Keplace �,xisting iixed windows (with no �rids) in front wall of Living Room to Double Hung windows with grids to match existing. See Sheets r�3 & ��_� During demolition, there was dryrot found in the existing Living Rm window wall. F.xisring windows will be replaced and will be consistent ��ith Style/pattern of rypical �vindows for an improved front elevation. 4. �djust window �rids for consistenc5� with e�:istin� window patterns. See Sheet A4 It recendy became apparent that the original grid pattern indicated on the approved elevations was not consistent with the existing grid patterns. Larger windows are n�w modified from 4 lites to 6 lites to match the existing grid pattern. �lso, the grids on the rear French doors are removed for the Client's preference for a clear �-iew to the rear yard. �'e hope that these requested adjustments will meet with your approval. Respectfully, �JWu'� LTna Kinsella, ?�rchitect CC: �3rian and Barbara Itott Enclosures: 1 full-size set of plans (sheets CS, A3 and A4) 9 half-size sets of plans (sheets CS, �3 and r�4) CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 23, 2014 4. 463 CUMBERLAND ROAD, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEAND SIDE SETBACKVARIANCE FORA FIRSTAND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (UNA KINSELLA, ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; BRIAN AND BARBARA KOTT, PROPERTY OWNERS) (66 NOTICED) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioner Sargent noted that he was not at the Design Review meeting for the project but viewed the video. There were no other ex-parte communications to report. Reference staff report dated June 23, 2014, with attachments. Planning Manager Gardiner presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission questions: ■ Is it possible the washer and dryer could be enclosed within the laundry room without it being considered a bedroom? (Strohmeier: Would need to review specifically what was being proposed.) Chair Bandrapalli opened the public hearing. Una Kinsella represented the applicant: Made adjustments to the plans in response to Commission comments. Support from the neighbors, including three letters that were not included in the staff report. Commission questions/comments: Would it be possible to create a connection between the garage and the laundry room? (Strohmeier: Depends on how the Building Division would classify the room. Could be submitted in building permit.) What material are the existing windows? (Kinsella: Anderson 400 Series vinyl.) Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Comments: ■ Special Permit fits within the design aesthetic. ■ Side setback variance continues an existing condition, and a substantial portion of the original house is being maintainted. ■ Variance is for 1'-2" but if was only 1 foot it would be a Minor Modification. ■ Applicant makes good argument that if they conformed to the 4-foot setback the visual impact might be even greater than the simplified facade they have proposed. Commissioner Sargent moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 11, 2014, sheets CS, C-1, A-1 through A-4 and L-1; /0 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 23, 2014 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 3, 2014, May 28, 2014 and April 22, 2014 memos, the Parks Division's April 29, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's April 21, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 29, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 11 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes June 23, 2014 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of the motion: ■ None. Chair Bandrapalli called for a voice vote on fhe motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner DeMartini absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:19 p.m. 12 � CITY �`'� : d 1 `� ;�� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: iB Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: d2� I� 3 �� ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: �� C�iM��RI�� - APPLICANT project contact person � PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ Payor of DSR deposiUhandling fee ❑ Payor of DSR deposit/handling fee8 OK to send electronic copies of documents p! OK to send electronic copies of documents E Name: (�1�1A �'IN�u�► Address: � � 33 M 11�A �) � Name: _�� Tr Address: � 3 Gj1��:R�r�� City/State/Zip: g�uN� ��0�� City/State/Zip: _gV�ri�11r`O�� Oro Phone: �S' � �� ' �� Z Fax: � E-mail: UMI�t�.l{ e C nn�1�• ��h Phone: �v�'��15 ` 311' S6 $� Fax: �' . . E-mai�: ---�R1�1• k.Di'c IN�11'• WM ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ect contact Person� Payor of DSR deposiUhandling fee ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: ____U1�i�► Ki�1S�Jul� Address: �,.,�� Od1i� 1 .,.� �..�. � �� p -:�� < �� °' �"`�'" � �' `� ` 7 City/State/Zip: ., � �.:,,� r;r t� ,�<e, .,.! a . �,� Phone: SEP � 0 2�?� Fax: c��v o,= au�u�!��,�f;� C0�-PlANNING DiV. E-mail: �k Burlingame Business License #: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AFFADAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my'knowledge and belief �• �•'� Applicant s signature: _� � Date: I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: D% Date submitted:_� �� k Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. S:�NANDOUTS�PCApplication.doc This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: �'pp� �Co► �on -�o� !� wt� c; w�u.v�,�' T� ��5,,�►�• �l1e�w �� .. U t - ��►� S -fv a �r��,'o� s) � A�o�-e d -�r S�- ,�,. d s<<�,. d S�brv� Gi. � c� t �ivh.. CUP DHE DSR E N SFD SP . . eviation `: Term .� Conditional Use Permit Declining Height Envelope Desi n Review Existin New Sin le Family Dwelling Sqecial Permit Project Comments Date: To: From: June 3, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 E►�i �Z:�'C�^A No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of this project will apply to this project. - . -- _ Reviewed by. Date:6-3-2014 � Project Comments t Date: �� May 28, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: Second Comments: 15. The plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of the building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved through other means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8 The response states: "Inset new 1St and 2"d floor walls + 1.5" for 3"-1/2" side yard setback." P/ease note that, although this is an existing huilding (home constructed in 1940) openin_qs were never al/owed within 3 feet of the property line. Further, because this building is considered a new building, see comment #10, all openings must comply with the current Building Code. Provide construction drawings that clear/y detail how all openings, existing windows, new windows, gable end venting, and attic ventilation, will comp/y with the Building Code by being placed more than 3 feet from the property line. NOTE: A written response to item #15 and plans that specifically address item #15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed by: —'��--'='� Date: 5-28-2014 J ` yr, BQ 50-558-7270 �� , . � _ . . .,_ _ _:.... _.._, _ .�. _ _.. .._ . _.,._ _,.. ..._ . _..... . € Project Comments E � Date: April 18, 2014 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 i� Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California j�Building Codes. l2�%As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and co�nmercial property biiilt prior to January l, 1994. Details can be found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill,/sen/sb 0401- 0450/sb 407 bil] 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show ,�C mpliance with this requirement. ��• )��pecify that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency -�Note: The California Building Standards Commission has delayed implementation of the 2013 Energy Codes. If an application is submitted for this project prior to July 1, 2014 then the project will be required to comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to fhe implementation af any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy �q s been issued. 2)P ovide a complete demolition plan that includes a legend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14�how the dimensions to adjacent structures. �y�,e plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of the building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved through other means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8 16 n the plans specify that the roof eaves on the right side of the building will not �roject within two feet of the property line. 17 dicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2013 CBC, Table 602) ��ooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on _ the elevation drawin s. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. � 19)I dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 20)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 21)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 22)P ovide lighting at all exterior landings. �)I, he fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 3, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for P � ning Commission action. .... . _ - --; ��_ Reviewed'��;----"""-�! � Date: 4-22-2014 Joe , �BO - 8-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (sso) sss-�2so X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 2. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a P►titected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). Plans show 3 non-protected trees proposed for removal. 3. Water Conservation in Landscape ordinance not required since landscape will not be rehabilitated. Please note on plans. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 4/29/14 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/06/2014 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly - Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � Date: �-� �_/�.-� Project Comments Date: To: From April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 i� Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for decfining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD �� Date: 4/29/14 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desi n Review Amendment for chanqes to a previouslv apqroved first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq at 463 Cumberland Road, Zoned R-1, Brian and Barbara Kott propertv owners APN: 029-163-070; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 22, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review Amendment are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman �, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd dav of September, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 463 Cumberland Road Effective October 2, 2014 Page 1 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 10, 2014 sheets CS, A-3 and A-4 and June 11, 2014, sheets C-1, A-1, A-2 and L-1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 3, 2014, May 28, 2014 and April 22, 2014 memos, the Parks Division's April 29, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's April 21, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 29, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review Amendment. 463 Cumberland Road Effective October 2, 2014 Page 2 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ��ayr�.J CITY OF BURLINGAME ��'�''� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT E:u�tuN��ME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 e, �lU � www.burlingame.org Site: 463 CUMBERIAND ROAD The (ity of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application far Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family at 463 CUMBERLAND ROAD zoned R-l. APN 026-021-080 Mailed: September 12, 2014 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ASHIZAWA YOSHIKO TR 65 FAIRWAY DR DALY CITY, CA 94015-- 1215 Citv of Burlin ac�me A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other sideJ