The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About463 Cumberland Drive - Staff ReportItem No. 4 Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 463 Cumberland Road City of Burlingame Design Review, Special Permit and Variance Address: 463 Cumberland Road Item No. 4 Action Item Meeting Date: June 23, 2014 Request: Application for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback Variance for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Architect: Una Kinsella Property Owners: Brian and Barbara Kott General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 029-163-070 Lot Area: 5,750 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The existing split level house and attached single-car garage contains 2,121 SF (0.37 FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing a first and second story addition at the front and rear of the house. With the proposed project, there will be an increase in the floor area from 2,121 SF (0.37 FAR) to 2,779 SF (0.48 FAR) where 2,940 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 161 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 5% of the maximum allowed FAR. The first floor wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it is set back 2'-10" where 4'-0" is the minimum required. The applicant is requesting a Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor wall along the right side property line at the front and rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required). The second story wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it encroaches into the declining height envelope by 47 SF (3'-6" x 13'-6"). The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for declining height envelope to extend the existing second story wall at the front and rear of the house. The new wall will encroach into the declining height envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0"). The existing house contains four bedrooms (the existing utility room behind the garage qualifies as a bedroom because it is enclosed and measures 70 SF in area). With this project, there is no increase in the number of bedrooms (the existing utility room will be converted to laundry room, relocating the washer and dryer from the garage). Therefore, two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site for a four-bedroom house. The existing attached garage provides one covered parking space (10' x 18' clear interior dimensions provided where 10' x 18" is the minimum required for an existing garage). One uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2); ■ Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (right side wall of the proposed second floor addition encroaches in to the envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0") (C.S. 25.26.035 (c)); and Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor wall along the right side property line at the front and rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (c) (1)). Design Review, Special Permit and Variance 463 Cumberland Road Lot Area: 5,750 SF EXISTING 463 Cumberland Road Plans date stam ed: June 11, 2014 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS ' ' _ _ _ _ _ . __ Front (1st flr): 20'-2" 20'-2" 20'-1" (block average) (2nd flr): 20'-2" 24'-0" 20'-1" (block average) . Side (left): 5'-0" no change 4'-0" (right): 2'-10"' 2'-10" Z 4'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ Rear (1st flr): 60'-11" 57'-7" 15'-0" (2nd flr): 60'-11" 57'-7" ' 20'-0" . _ Lot Coverage: 1269 SF ' 1542 SF 2300 SF 22% ' 26.8% 40% _ _ __ : __. FAR: 2121 SF ' 2779 SF ' 2940 SF 3 0.37 FAR , 0.48 FAR 0.51 FAR _ . _ _.. # of bedrooms: 3 ' S --- : Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered ' 1 covered (10' x 18' clear interior) (10' x 18' clear interior) (18' x 18' clear interior) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered ' 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _ _ _ : Height: 28'-6" , 29'-10" 30'-0" _ . DH Envelope: encroaches 47 SF 4 encroaches 65 SF 5 Special Permit (3'-6" x 13'-6") (3'-6" x 18'-5") ' required ' Existing non-conforming right side setback (2'-10" existing where 4'-0" is required). Z Side Setback Variance required (2'-10" proposed where 4'-0" is required). ' (0.32 x 5750 SF) + 1100 SF = 2940 SF (0.51 FAR). 4 Existing right side second story wall is non-conforming because it encroaches into the declining height envelope by 47 SF. 5 Special Permit required for right side second story wall of addition to encroach into declining height envelope by 65 SF. Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Fire, Engineering and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on June 9, 2014, the Commission had several questions and comments regarding the proposed project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached June 9, 2014 Planning Commission minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans dated June 11, 2014, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. Please refer to the copy of the June 9, 2014, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Planning staff would note that since the design review meeting on June 9, 2014, the applicant eliminated the request for a Parking Variance for number of parking spaces by converting the existing utility room, which 2 Design Review, Specia/ Permit and Variance 463 Cumberland Road previously qualified as a bedroom, to a laundry room (the washer and dryer currently located in the garage will be relocated to the new laundry room). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 3 Design Review, Special Permit and Variance 463 Cumberland Road that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 11, 2014, sheets CS, C-1, A-1 through A-4 and L-1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 3, 2014, May 28, 2014 and April 22, 2014 memos, the Parks Division's April 29, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's April 21, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 29, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 4 Design Review, Special Permit and Variance 463 Cumberland Road 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Una Kinsella, applicant and architect Brian and Barbara Kott, property owners Attachments: ApplicanYs Response Letter, dated June 11, 2014 June 9, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes E-mail from Brian and Barbara Kott, property owners, dated June 9, 2014 Letter of Support from John and Marilyn Horgan, 471 Cumberland Road, dated June 2, 2014 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Variance Applications Photographs of Neighborhood Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed June 13, 2014 Aerial Photo � UMK ARCHITECTURE 1033 Paloma Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 umkarch_�a?_gmail.com_ / 415.730.1812 6/11/14 Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road, CA 94010 Attn: Planning Commissioners Ruben Hurin — Planning Department Re: The Kott Residence 463 Cumberland Responses to Planning Commission Comments '.�:'�s1�� V �� ; 1 � 2014 "�l;R� i,l��q�� Please note the following modificarions to the plans by UMK Architecture dated `revised 6/11/14' in response to Planning Commission comments from the 6/9/14 hearing. Planning Commission Comments Chimney on Exterior Elevations does not reflect shape of existing chimney. It was advised to consider removing the request for Parking Variance by handling the `Utiliry Rm' differendy so that it would not be deemed a bedroom. Consider changing the Garage door upper panel grids to something more in keeping with the style of the house. UMK Responses The chimney has been adjusted to match the existing conditions with straight right side and stepped left side. The Utility room has been revised to incorporate the Washer/Dryer into the space. The Garage door upper panel has been modified to remove the diamond grid pattern to blend better with the existing window pattern. I hope that these responses address your comments and concerns. We look forward to presenting these revised plans to the Planning Commission at the 6/23/14 hearing. Respectfully, � `�"^'� Una Kinsella, Architect CC: Brian and Barbara Kott Enclosures: 1 full-size set of plans; 9 half-size sets of plans; 1 8.5 x 11 set of plans 1 pdf version of plans EXCERPT — June 9, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes 463 Cumberland Road (Agenda Item 7) IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 7. 463 CUMBERLAND ROAD, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (UNA KINSELLA, ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; BRIAN AND BARBARA KOTT, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioners Terrones and Loftis reported that they had had conversations with the applicant. Reference staff report dated June 9, 2014, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: None. Chair Bandrapalli opened the public comment period. Brian/Barbara Kott and Una Kinsella represented the applicant. They love Burlingame and their neighborhood. Have tried to keep the neighbors fully informed of their plans. Asking for a few special exceptions for the project in order to maintain the setback non- conformity at the front and rear of the structure. Commission comments: ■ Is the chimney being kept? (Kinsella — will replace with a wood-framed chimney and clad it in stone.) ■ Where is the fifth bedroom? (Kinsella — the utility room off of the kitchen counts as a potential fifth bedroom even though it is open to the kitchen and doesn't include a closet.) ■ Has spoken to the neighbors; they are all supportive of the proposal. Is concerned that a future neighbor may be concerned about the reduced setback. ■ Was any thought given to setting back the second story a bit and making up the difference on the rear of the home; could give a new neighbor a bit more of a sense of separation between the structures. (Kinsella — this would result in a short section of roof and revisions to other portions of the roof that would not be necessarily consistent with the neighborhood.) ■ There are a significant number of trees on the right side of the property; will these remain? (Kinsella — were originally going to remove trees, but now intend to maintain the large Maple tree that can be seen from the street and remove one small Maple from the rear yard.) ■ Was consideration given to moving the washer and dryer into the utility room from the garage? Doing so would enhance the usability of the utility room. (Kinsella - didn't wish to move the plumbing because the garage would never be considered a two car garage even without the washer and dryer's presence. Strohmeier — could move the washer/dryer and/or water heater into the utility room and eliminate its consideration as a bedroom.) EXCERPT — June 9, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes 463 Cumberland Road (Agenda Item 7) • Some windows include divided lights, some do not; was any consideration given to making them all the same? (Kinsella — prefer the large expanse of these picture windows.) ■ Could a different garage door be provided that would fit better with the design of the home? (Kinsella — will review and consider an alternate design.) ■ There may be enough unique circumstances to warrant granting the setback variances. Not sure that the existence of a non-conforming garage can justify a parking variance for a five bedroom home. The need for this variance is driven by the program of the project. If the utility room were converted to a laundry room, then that space would not be counted as a bedroom and a parking variance would not be necessary. Could also open up at least fifty-percent of this room to the kitchen so that it wouldn't be considered a bedroom. ■ What is the utility room currently used for? (Kinsella — used as storage space for the kids. Kott — there isn't a means of closing off the utility room from the kitchen.) ■ Is there a door between the utility room and the garage? (Kinsella — no.) • Need better justification for the parking variance or eliminate it from the request by revising the project to eliminate consideration of the utility room as a bedroom. Public comments: Mike Ortiz, 470 Cumberland Road, spoke: Is supportive of design. He and wife did a similar design years ago. Likes the traditional look of the home. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Yie made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: Include an enhanced porch with the design. Chair Bandrapalli called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Regu/ar Action Calendar when p/ans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Sargent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appea/ab/e. This item concluded at 8:59 p.m. � 06.09.14 PC Meeting ; �� t�t�� 17��K1:'��l-�l��:�� Item #7 � 463 Cumberland Rd. Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED JUN 09 2014 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD — PLANNING DIV. From: Kott, Brian [mailto:Brian KottC�intuit.com] Sent: Monday, ]une 09, 2014 3:45 PM To: CD/PLG-Hurin, Ruben Cc: Una Kinsella; Barb Kott Subject: Information about our proposed renovation at 463 Cumberland Road Hi Ruben, My name is Brian Kott and my wife, Barbara, and I are the owners of 463 Cumberland Road. We wanted to send you a brief email before tonight's meeting to let you know about the communications we have had with our neighbors regarding our proposed renovation. We have spoken to many of the neighbors on our street about the remodel and everyone has expressed both support and enthusiasm for the remodel. Each of our neighbors noted the renovation will increase home value on the street, and that our proposed design will fit in perfectly with the overall aesthetic of the street. We were most concerned about the support of our next door neighbor to the right of us, Lynn Herrick at 467 Cumberland Road. As such, we reached out to her on Friday, 5/30, the first day the sign went up in our yard. Lynn came to our house and we walked her through the house to show her the proposed renovations. We also walked her through the plans. She seemed very supportive and happy for us. On Monday, 6/2, Lynn came over again and said she wasn't sure if she had any concerns, but wanted to walk through the remodel again. Lynn noted she wanted to better understand the impact on her house. We walked through everything again and she was very appreciative. On Friday, 6/6, my wife went to Lynn's house and offered a meeting with Lynn and our architect, Una, to help her if she had any more questions or wanted to walk through everything again. She was incredibly appreciative and said she would think about it. On Saturday 6/7, Lynn came over and told us she had thought about it but didn't think a meeting with the architect was necessary. She was supportive of the remodel. We told her to come talk to us if any other questions came up. We are really grateful of the suppoR from our neighbors as we try to cnha�ice our home. Best, Brian and Barbara Kott June ?. �(l14 Reeardine APN 026-021-080: h`i t:l� � i V �C �.J� UN -3 20,� �, i Y OF BURLINGAME �nf? at a��1Nl�l� OIV. Please be advised that the proposal to make significant chanees/additions to the sin�le-familv home at 463 Cumberland Road makes eminent good design sense. The plan, if implemented, would meld this particular two-story dwellin�'s look with two other houses located nearby, one next door, the other two doors away. All three two-story homes were built bv R.W. Bessett in the late 1930s. iust arior to the onset of World War II. They are very similar in appearance. The aroaosed chan�es at 463 Cumberland, if aqproved, would match the front of that home with the other two Bessett structures. The net effect on the west side of Cumberland Road would be auite attractive. The additional square footage envisioned appears to fit with city rules. For all of the above reasons. we wholeheartedlv sunnort the brotiosed improvements at 463 Cumberland Road. Thank you for your �nncirlPrati�n Yours. ,� , �� -�l�``1- ;'�` t � John and Marilvn Hor�an d71 ('iimhArlanrl Rnarl � ;�,,,....J � Burlin�ame. CA 94010 r��....�. '1 �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: �1 Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit ❑ Parcel #: �Z��' � �3 - 07� ❑ Other: PROJECTADDRESS:__ `}'Sp'� ('fuW114E�R,l-��'tvl� APPLICANT project contact peraon�d OK to send electronic copies of documents� ►vame: UNA WtJSEI.I,P� Address: (0�} 3 P� OW%� City/State/Zip: (3�11121i , � �i �}'0 ( D Phone: �}� S' � �JO' ��'i 12 Fax: E-mail: ��k'i�i�'� �' ��(� ,(�O�ll PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents� Name: BlQlfti�! t bA-�Z��h(Lt! j�-0 ['r' Address: �(03 C..t)M1'3E�7`j� City/State/Zip: ��'I��+F'�'�E � G� 9-#-ola Phone: Fax: . E-mail: �titl�--.� �. ��!'�• �:o1M ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person DQ OK to send electronlc coples of documents� Name: �O►W►G AS ou►O�o�IGar'►� Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail: * Burlingame Business License PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 22687 St t �� GOYC ��ol�l't'��N 'i�► �►�Il�ar ��IV�� ,� f' l ; 201�i -'LINGAME ;�NG DIV. G �'C�'1 Ev1 � .1 � �.., AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. � �( Applicant's signature: L�i�,N/ Date: + %cS � / I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. �Z Property owner's signature: Date: � % Date submitted: �-'�'i�� * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. S: �HANDOUTS�PC Applicotion.doc �{<03 cuM�.RL�1b City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlin4ame.or4 � c�ry �� ' � � � T:i�� _�� M1�o �•�' ��.�� PP, � i 2014 CITY OF:BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION �� QUE$'i �fll'L 17�� 0�'i'70►�+ C"`r r!� �-=;!;��(NGAME The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City�s�O�din'anc� D1V (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent wifh the existing structure's design and with the existing sireef and neighborhood. `�tE �.W.s�riNG 2�"°� �-N� W�vc. �Nb RooF �t�s�t�► w�-��tf. �tteST' �-�00,2 wA'Lt. �Ko- eo't�f 3t�S of �E -4tamE.. � �PrtopoSF� +v�si�•t iff.�,�5 rfH� GoN't�NU �'M1� 0'F � �� '� �%}'KR dC�1Q � 'T� .�-toM� P�t O�f i'F� iK PA�'t o� '[�tE G�� W 6U t� �t t�Eas G�s �S�.NT �- � t�u u�� A� S{'�tT s�nE Kc� Ltr� A�n `f�E G4�trnNFti wQv�.�o �r GoNNEd' wrt� �1E SYl�. �Y�IF-K1aK. WA�t�t� WN';ch� 1s tmpo�tfiANr'• 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consisfent with the exisfing structure, street and neighborhood. oU� Pt�tw►P�`f GoPn. IS 'iti �EP 'T�E Ac�n�rt�to�t fts�kE W CT�4 -�t�. . �r"5nt�t�j ARiGrtK�t. �uvN+R� } AR�M'ti�Gt�� t4A�;�f�'E'�. Get�t�N�A�r -�E P.161�4s- ScnE W�Cu.+ �oo�u�r� Wfl.c. �h�rE 'f�ts ��+ct�. '�t£ 1'hP��i�S � WtNh�s � I(ioaF t�fNf�f fi d�t� Wi�i. ��#� S�EEM�gS��t W l'C1d '1}�k£ '�.1� 9fi1�tC� -N�Vr1�. 3. How will the proposed project be consisfent with the residenfial design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? `f� .�f�tfr�� Cf1E S6��t4P� Stv�n lt�kK t1nn6'S o'K'�bE s'TK��' W tt'�t r(-�tE ��r►� �avMt�liJ'i r Fj�'1'6N� 2"" �oorZ tJsP�l�s) -`t�tf nEsi6-�1 W Gd� bE �'E N'ti �-tv � f'� N�t�rf{ $orz�b P� P�+°�1� `b�c�c1�P4� •' 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. . 'i�RE �E 2 �'u-'�'-� pRoPa9�o �a�R RF.movh�.. ot�+E "1`�'� 15 !N'f�E l�WV6aiPE1 ��aVAc� f5 N�S"Sf�RY ��`� 113g�t+�AmaN' (� �IN�Rg A(N l�It�C�- OF �Rl��t � C��' �cKS d�F rP�E �i1RE�?'� . �� MP�� f0 fi�f f t$�6�tE'I ffl1W' �E� rs NJ f �$l1�'1� �t�'� 5 �'F'iR�Ow� Rev. 07.2008 � ee ve f ex lanation of bove � ue SP CIA�.,PERMIT AP FORM `� �� av(�b�m�"t�. j�»ovltJ�- �r I� ��FtR`f �a1K �� ti' e�PA��f�f . `Tft�f�z€ ��E �'�t��- St�Nt�tCA�t' '�12�."� of� ?ft� I�tZoP�RT`I �rbaT �Xc�-E� -r�t'� �rRE� Pt,P�rr�- �c��cr�E�r�-�tr-s. �•:i; •t,'�.i=�y-3":'•1t.. ; ; �•'. � City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq 1. Explain why fhe blend of mass, sca/e and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and_with the existing streef and neighborhood. r�T;� :.. .,.,: ,.r-, �:}t•ir.� •=3"1 . ►'.'..'�"++` "' '1' .. •:1 ; How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain ,how the; varie� y of roof.line, facade� exter�or finish maferials and glevations� of t�� pr`o,�iosed�`ne�"vstruc�fu►'e dr�aa�c�jfion are co�isrsten�vt�ith the ezistlii�i s�tr't�ct�l�e;�'�fre�e�Y�'iid r��igl�bo'rh�%rord '' �~�..:`' -�'':l ,"'.� , � `,,', � . � � ay'-�•= 1 :�;�'►, i"•'� '�3� ;'�:tf�•" i� ��:-1 � ' :�t, � :��Pt?� �}:a }%;`� �,��l�.�.��.R- �::f.� .yt�;1,�� 4 How does tf�e:�3rppp�d�tn,icttll'�or.g� cclr�r�ae�thetic�llywith�s�truct�r,�s�9r y�es±ig�he��yst�r�g�neigf}bDrC�ood? If it �I e n t �f ct a��Fjetic��,sta e�� y. �(1(�s �hg.add'ition desi�ne,r��o match exi�ting archi ectur� a�,dlor pattern of 'developmerlt�on'a�lja�er�~�i�ope�iestn�t�i� i%i�gfi�brtiodti?'Ei�'�I�in whyyo'Lr'p�rdj3osal fit'�'in#h��neighbb�o�c�=i •�iZ•tr'��':�0`�it�+�' <: 'l��.• tf3t�` . �.Sr.s��: .';�t.s:•';��3�1.,r �.�. i �:� =�,',(,` How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. ,'�..... } ' l t;-�y i • � :iv -'� ♦ � 1' t. -r. ' �1 w�• r t 1 ti t� . . r ��T�{'1: ��1�� L�.1i�� .��'� ��i:i'7 •J�-� J �..i.. `I •.�}\S.i�• � /I��r�. ' e • e.. ♦ • • ♦ I ' n'`*��:l.. � } � ��,'�•'t �• `i_y � ..�,.�'�, �.�i,trli�l�", � �;'`�i ��T-•�,r�'. .-:{;��r!'� ::�L �►'Jlwt ,: .�.•f, .�U.�,t. .:,:t. ,r,v� � '�� ;h� �'t•'�� 3. How.�will t��,.prc}pose�l,.��jgcf�b� cn�s�s,fer�t�.wi��.tthg:�esid�nt,�a�:design �Ua':. ��j -t..S�a�1��T .;sJl:?C.'e,;�jj�i��''.� ';' Z'�'' i�"�: ��•'� ''r � :i'i�l: �-i1�� `'��',yi''�j'w;�. a � Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residentia��lesigrt reJi�e�iv'�hldVii?'do�s�youc'�l'i;aJe�t meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. ArC}tiFf�cfura�'s�yi��i�i��mafis�riCbulKo'��c�uce5 •'s.; :r;:� ,��ti��}'�s:�;' 3>;;'� :�.`•r:r' � ;, � y=,�,: 4. j,d e�, af.t�e, pro , sedst,uctur��ith.the��6tructure,s An �dj�c�nt�proPe,r�ies;.a�i��. ,• r '... "��e F•, 5. tand�s ping and its�pi�opo�tion to" '� ''ss� and bulk �f'�tru�f �al cbm'pon�r7t�. '�� •�i �� h; �. . , �.�t� .�r�♦.. � ♦ � C.•! � • ��• �, r� �"�; ..'�/,��•J.� r�. � ♦ �{r�'� ��•':i��,�_,' ,.�-t�ff�.. � .,.�,► ..:;�,,,�-;�,,'�;,�..�•? ._.•r , ., ..�►:'�43:i; . . =�j ..�,;'t�; 4. Explain how the removal of any frees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistenf wifh the city's reforestafion requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriafe. .+•:'l''` -�.)r��, .,i�•t:•t'.til�'i�a . x'5��.� '-�':r7,''t'.ri_.?:;`{ !-'�,�r1i'.1,'t�t;� , � v?�'tf� ""�tiS�,�J.~. i: Will an. f�ees befremoved; as result of this ro,posai? , If so, explain wnat o trees Wilt �e removed an�, if any are Y . � . .P,.. . , , -. . �'� � .•, • ., > , protecfed�ur�der,ci�ordiFiarice (d:�:'41.06�); wM�tit7snet�ess�2�rto rer�o�e��'e�trees� and'v�hat f's�iei�lg`prb�bs�d,to replace any trees being,r�i�red::Jf ryo�ttee�'�re,to�p�cem6��d,�ay soS,r�.i,=��,yl�� '�:; -`��', i:�,; �.,� ;* t'; >�iL:�� {y��=is',. �;7� ,•��!�•`t ..�'�:1..� �.r ri i t. iA/ i�3�f:i~�ii��:.~3t�i�t�1+: i� r.�� i�:l;�, �y..'1,��.1�:�. �I,�� t • �i .•'Z;t;i:• '';! ��..1� �irr • � � �) � �• •` � :i •� � ' ,..�:11' �7` � ..S�t..i: �'`�ii "y".= ,'�"�r ��{ . - �S'�t-, ��: .,��`;•�• .�: 1 .. 'f"•�'r t' � � � ' �..z�'j-..`-�1�-'� ' �� `.r'Iti."� i i. ,'�'. 't�.. •r ..�• , ..��:�..`'1 i!-'Z:.'.. 'i! �'i .f�1'i,? .�.j:.� � � �.��.j� S . ..:;t':.r�l��::�T! _ :,=; ,'1;.�-ZJ�y �:}-:�,•.:i, ...'F, 4G3 G�MgW2�,AcNl� �, CITY �� : / � = s�� ,'--.•••.e J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org V' L i�' CITY OF BURLINGAME VARtANCE APPLICATION r �=,�eE �,c.� ��►orr� 2014 'n�.r The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type orwrite neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. 'C1�� Nc'r 2• S; t�2Y �SE -I�fls P� 2� ( Dn YZ1Gt�lT s�� SF�� • WFe�E ¢D ls C.un.iLF-M' �R.E�2"C. G�-T1F-Nn 1�-�-'T4t� �Xq5�i7�6r WA�� M' AcREA D'� A�tvMidN ts trn�a,rtTltt�i' �a� GoNsl=TEtJc�{ �'► 'tD FL�Nn urttdfi- �.XaS�-1�. A�lZGl�t�tv�K.� b. Explain why the variance requesf is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ofa substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. � l4,'► o�f-r �r "�- r2,t�tr- si�oE c�uAtil- wov�.�o cirztp� � V'I,�At.�IAR�.t�t f�� }il-"�}f'lTK N6T G�NS�sT'�T' W�- -t'�E o�lC�tN/tti 0'2 SlM It,�IZ fijaV S�3 ON'"T1�1�6- b'��-�T • "fti-i� li�ll.l4+2 31��'t�Q ct�Ovl.�o BE `t lN'�p►��-�o �1 'l�tf 4PfS�' V'�01ltAD N�" D�� N�rZiq't- OI�. LOCrI�'�- P�� 66�t�- �'� S'1�C�vY�V � A-fLf-�'� Ct�E�.C�TW�t- f'�1�Zia75�- c. Explain why ihe proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. A-L t(�NIN Cs Nsw I.��S W R?+ E�X�I S-tiN�- wIL{. v'Rovl Iv� !`� c�A'�' fi �,o k E r i v E E X�� s i ou � Vt f snc�rc�ncc }�c.t,� � W i �,�. . ��e ��r� w ct�►f- '�t� F�u$r-�G {-tays� � I� 6f�o�a �N6- tbvsr��s o� s �u� . st`�E o� T� S'h�F.�t". `TK� W�u- �E viSuq�t. Gott�siv� N��s w�h'ctt �+! t�l. ( MPripvE "f�t% l,odj� GF i'� ��m� � W 1N. �Ot �E nEaYt 1 MENT�h.'T� P�l.�� {-t�/1v'(�t, �f.�^�( + W �L�,� . d. How will the proposed project be compatible wiih the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? , -�� W PM. +,�LaoF Atii6�l1 vh�M' w I t.t. M/�rZti � M 1� it��s �rr T� urur�rt�t fi w"iu. l,oaK. ��A�u�-� k o�w�K�t. tk a+PQosEo"� /� N�t�tti oN w f v� �H�,rt p►-��ErV sTi L 2o�v�,tN F�s �` Wf�u. a�ff��s. Handouts�Variance Application2008 � _ � �� " -��... _�_ � ___�_".�.:___,,,,.� `�.�� 451 CUMBERLAND .,,: _ � � u �� ,,.�---�^--, � � i, i�+�: � Vt �w ', �� _ � e.�_ 463 CUMBERLAND SUBJECT PROPERTY 455 CUMBERLAND 467 CUMBERLAND _, _. h. � � l� � � _-- � �=i � M,�;- ; ,tl , - �1.. � - � �' — �.. '��;, �' T51�: n _.-. - �._ �a ,�ir-'. _ — - ._ ;�=:.G � � _ ,.— � � ' -- `_ ��" -- -- -""" � � �ill�'" 459 CUMBERLAND 463 CUMBERLAND SUBJECT PROPERTY c � �'v �; ,: iN �+ � � x f - x, � . � 1� S ,aF ��•� �, � t ` ---� -'r�.. . _ '�7 ' '-_ • ^. __ .�� • _. �` I , � �-_ � � � � � I�,�, :7: �` '►� + — � �r�_ __ _ , _. — __ ��1 �_ � � . '� - �---�-�-`� 471 CUMBERLAND 475 CUMBERLAND _ � @� � �_ .. ii`:, CIT�i �>r ' "'LINGAME— CE ,-;.s�� _ ��tJG DIV Project Comments Date: To: From: June 3, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of this project will apply to this project. _ / Reviewed by. Date:6-3-2014 �. � � Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: May 28, 2014 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 Parks Division 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Second Comments: 15. The plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of the building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved through other means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8 The response states: "Inset new 1S` and 2"d floor walls + 1.5" for 3"-1/2" side yard setback."P/ease note that, although this is an existing building (home constructed in 1940) openin_qs were never allowed within 3 feet of the propertv line. Further, because this building is considered a new building, see comment #10, all openings must comply with the current Building Code. Provide construction drawings that clearly detail how all openings, existing windows, new windows, gable end venting, and attic ventilation, will comply with the Building Code by being placed more than 3 feet from the property line. NOTE: A written response to item #15 and plans that specifically address item #15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. -- � Reviewed by: -- - f --- Date: 5-28-2014 J yr, BO 50-558-7270 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California �� Building Codes. �As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ptib/09-10/Uil�sen/sb 0401- 0450 jsb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show � mpliance with this requirement. 3) ecify that this project will comply with the 2008 Califomia Energy Efficiency ote: The California Building Standards Commission has delayed implementation of the 2013 Energy Codes. If an application is submitted for this project prior to July 1, 2014 then the project will be required to comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. 4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 7) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 9) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy s been issued. 2)P ovide a complete demolition plan that includes a leaend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 14��how the dimensions to adjacent structures. �yhe plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of the building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved through other means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8 16�n the plans specify that the roof eaves on the right side of the building will not Rroject within two feet of the property line. L17�,1r'�dicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2013 CBC, Table 602) 18),�2ooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window �-- or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. �19)1�ldicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 20)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 21)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC § 1009. 22)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. �)��'he fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC §1003.9. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2, 3, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for P ning Commission action. Revieweckb�:- � / %�� Date: 4-22-2014 Joe ,�CBO 6 8-7270 Project Comments Date: To: April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (sso) sss-72so � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 2. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Prr�tected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). Plans show 3 non-protected trees proposed for removal. 3. Water Conservation in Landscape ordinance not required since landscape will not be rehabilitated. Please note on plans. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 4/29/14 N� Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/06/2014 Project Comments Date: To: From: April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 �Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � Date: �—1 QZ�z./y Project Comments Date: To: From April 18, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558- 7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070 Staff Review: April 21, 2014 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD `�� Date: 4/29/14 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review, Special Permit for declininq heiqht envelope and Side Setback Variance for a first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq at 463 Cumberland Road, Zoned R-1, Brian and Barbara Kott, qropertv owners, APN: 029-163-070; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 23, 2014, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review, Special Permit and Variance are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review, Special Permit and Variance are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd dav of June, 2014, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Special Permit and Variance. 463 Cumberland Road Effective July 3, 2014 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 11, 2014, sheets CS, C-1, A-1 through A-4 and L-1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Building Division's June 3, 2014, May 28, 2014 and April 22, 2014 memos, the Parks Division's April 29, 2014 memo, the Engineering Division's May 6, 2014 memo, the Fire Division's April 21, 2014 memo and the Stormwater Division's April 29, 2014 memo shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Special Permit and Variance. 463 Cumberland Road Effective July 3, 2014 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. ��y'�� CITY OF BURLINGAME r,'_��''� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURur�c:��nE 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 'i �,,W i' � � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �''T�. _- . PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 463 CUMSERLAND ROAD The City of Burlingame Planning iummissior� unnounces the following public hearing on MONDAY, lUNE 23, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall �;,�,��i! (hambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A: Application for Design Review, Sp2�ial Permit for declining height envelope and Side Setback Variance for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463 CUMBERLAND ROAD zoned R-l. APN 026-021-080 (Ple�a�el ref�ei to o her s3�e�2014 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ASHIZAWA YOSHIKO TR 65 FAIRWAY DR DALY CITY, CA 94015-- 1215 Citv of Burlinqame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)