HomeMy WebLinkAbout463 Cumberland Drive - Staff Report (2)Item No. 7
Design Review Study
PROJECT LOCATION
463 Cumberland Road
City of Burlingame
Design Review, Special Permit and Variances
Address: 463 Cumberland Road
Item No. 7
Design Review Study
Meeting Date: June 9, 2014
Request: Application for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height envelope, Side Setback Variance
and Parking Variance for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling.
Applicant and Architect: Una Kinsella
Property Owners: Brian and Barbara Kott
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 029-163-070
Lot Area: 5,750 SF
Zoning: R-1
Project Description: The existing split level house and attached single-car garage contains 2,121 SF (0.37
FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing a first and second story addition at
the front and rear of the house. With the proposed project, there will be an increase in the floor area from
2,121 SF (0.37 FAR) to 2,779 SF (0.48 FAR) where 2,940 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The
proposed project is 161 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 5% of the maximum
allowed FAR.
The first floor wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it is set back 2'-10" where
4'-0" is the minimum required. The applicant is requesting a Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor
wall along the right side property line at the front and rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where
4'-0" is the minimum required).
The second story wall along the right side property line is nonconforming because it encroaches into the
declining height envelope by 47 SF (3'-6" x 13'-6"). The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for
declining height envelope to extend the existing second story wall at the front and rear of the house. The
new wall will encroach into the declining height envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0").
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms is increasing from three to five (the existing utility room
behind the garage qualifies as a bedroom because it is enclosed and measures at least 70 SF in area).
Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site for a five-bedroom house. The
existing attached garage provides one covered parking space (10' x 18' clear interior dimensions provided
where 10' x 18" is the minimum required for an existing garage). One uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is
provided in the driveway. Since only two parking spaces are provided on-site where three spaces are
required for the increase in the number of bedrooms to five, the applicant is requesting a Parking Variance
for the number of parking spaces. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is
requesting the following applications:
• Design Review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2);
- Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope (right side wall of the proposed second floor addition
encroaches in to the envelope by 65 SF (3'-6" x 13'-5" and 3'-6" x 5'-0") (C.S. 25.26.035 (c));
■ Side Setback Variance to extend the first floor wall along the right side property line at the front and
rear of the house (2'-10" existing and proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S.
25.26.072 (c) (1)); and
■ Parking Variances for number of off-street parking spaces based on an increase to five bedrooms
(two parking spaces provided (one covered and one uncovered) where three parking spaces are
required (two covered and one uncovered) (C.S. 25.70.030 (a) (2)).
Design Review, Special Permit and Variances
463 Cumberland Road
Lot Area: 5.750 SF
SETBACKS
_ __._.... __ _._ __ .
Fronf (1st flr):
(2nd flr):
__ _ _. _ _ _ _ _
Side (left):
(right):
Rear (1st f/r):
(2nd flr):
Lot Coverage:
FAR:
# of bedrooms:
_ _ __ _ _ ........_......._
Off-Street Parking:
Heigh t:
DH Envelope:
,
z
3
4
s
s
20'-2"
24'-0"
__.
Plans date stamped: June 2, 2014
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
20'-2"
20'-2"
_ _. _.
5'-0"
2'-10"'
_ __.
60'-11"
60'-11"
1269 SF
22%
__... .__ .. .
2121 SF
0.37 FAR
3
4'-0"
4'-0"
__ _ ___ __ _ _.
15'-0"
20'-0"
2300 SF
40%
____ ___ . ........ _......_ _._ _ .... _ _._
2779 SF 2940 SF 3
0.48 FAR 0.51 FAR
5 ' ---
_ __ __. : _........ _ _..._.... _..
1 covered 1 covered 4 2 covered
(10' x 18' clear interior) ; (10' x 18' clear interior) '; (18' x 18' clear interior)
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') ' (9' x 20') (9' x 20')
28'-6"
encroaches 47 SF 5
(3'-6" x 13'-6")
463 Cumberland Road
20'-1" (block average)
20'-1" (block average)
_ __..... __ _
no change
2'-10" Z
_ _ __ _.
57'-7"
57'-7"
1542 SF
' 26.8%
29'-10"
encroaches 65 SF 6
(3'-6" x 18'-5")
30'-0"
Special Permit
required
Existing non-conforming right side setback (2'-10" existing where 4'-0" is required).
Side Setback Variance required (2'-10" proposed where 4'-0" is required).
(0.32 x 5750 SF) + 1100 SF = 2940 SF (0.51 FAR).
Parking Variance for number of off-street parking spaces based on an increase to five bedrooms (two
parking spaces provided (one covered and one uncovered) where three parking spaces are required
(two covered and one uncovered)
Existing right side second story wall is non-conforming because it encroaches into the declining height envelope by
47 SF.
Special Permit required for right side second story wall of addition to encroach into declining height envelope by 65
SF.
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Fire, Engineering and Stormwater
Divisions.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by
the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1
�
3
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
2
Design Review, Special Permit and Variances 463 Cumberland Road
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that
the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The b�end of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition
are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure
or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d) rem�val of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is
proposed is appropriate.
Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the
following ��nditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property
involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Una Kinsella, applicant and architect
Brian and Barbara Kott, property owners
Attachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Letter of Support from John and Marilyn Horgan, 471 Cumberland Road, dated June 2, 2014
Special Permit Application
Variance Applications
Photographs of Neighborhood
Staff Comments
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 30, 2014
Aerial Photo
3
,��=i\�;..
.`'iri�'.
UUilLtrv�.r>M!.
� II�_�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
I�l Design Review ❑ Variance
❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit
❑ Parcel #: �2�r � �03 � ���
❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: � ChtJW�l��lZl-��KI�
APPLICANT project contact person�
OK to send electronic copies of documents�
Name: UNA 1�1i.1 S�l.l.p'�
Address: ( �3 3 P� OW►/�'C
City/State/Zip: �UI� � � ��� � D
Phone: �5' �3�' ��12
Fax:
E-mail: V ������ �' FfW►ihL .�.e�A
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents�
Name: �j�IPHJ t bA-�ilbtt'�__j�-0 Ct'
Address: `�(o� C-Uhni3E��-�N�_
City/State/Zip: ��'���'�'� � � 9'�"��a
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail: �(ttilY�--.� G ���'�• CoY►''
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person 1�
OK to send electronic copies of documents�i
Name: �nwn� AS [Ju0w�1GEW►�'
��—
Address
City/State/Zip: �-- �-
�� � ��✓� ��
Phone:
Fax
E-mail
* Burlingame Business License
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
22687
St t ��10 �l.00�r� A�1-17�N -1b e►�1�ay
� �NGAR�IE
^JG Dlv
G I�h��1
t I�las•Ge,� "
AFFADAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalry of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief. /��
Applicant's signature: Date: � � �� ��
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission.
Property owner's signature: Date: � �
Date submitted: �-'�7 ���'f '
k
�
tit Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
i �; 2 01=j
5: � HANDOU7S� PC Applica[io n. doc
June 2. 2014
����1 V ��
. _ ;,
Re�ardin� APN 026-021-080: '�
_ =... ' _ °.��1E
_ _._ . ='J.
Please be advised that the proposal to make significant
chan�es/additions to the sin�le-familv home at 463 Cumberland Road
makes eminent good design sense. The plan, if implemented, would
meld this particular two-story dwellin�'s look with two other houses
located nearby, one next door, the other two doors away. All three
two-story homes were built bv R.W. Bessett in the late 1930s, iust arior
to the onset of World War II. They are very similar in appearance. The
aroposed chan�es at 463 Cumberland, if aqproved. would match the
front of that home with the other two Bessett structures. The net effect
on the west side of Cumberland Road would be auite attractive. The
additional square footage envisioned appears to fit with city rules. For
all of the above reasons, we wholeheartedlv suoqort the proaosed
improvements at 463 Cumberland Road. Thank you for your
�nnci�IPratinn
Yours. „' .
�,-�--�---- _ � ��,
Y, �
J
John and M�rilvn Hor�an
d71 ('iimhPrlanrl Rnarl
Burlin�ame, CA 94010
�3 cuMeF�.�b
0
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinqame.orq
��
BURLINGAME
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
�• ' - - ' G Y � �S/
� ��j�;
� �-
�Quc-� r � tiN�. �w-f-ia�► ,�iNGAME
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinanc� ��v.
(Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1.
�
Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the
new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and
with the existing street and neighborhood.
-P�t� �s-�G 2'"'� r� wM�c- a�rh �toaF �us{v w��E �tteST'
�t�oo,2 wAU.. �Ko- bo'i�i 3t�s o'F '1�E -l��E.. �:�E �PROPOsf� OES16'u
�,�5 �Tr4E C�N�t�Nu i� 0'f � ���� � ��KR �� � �
.�-toM�. P�r O�FFi�vr iK PP�'� o� '�tE I�� W�No �t t�E1s c-�Ns�S�NT �-
� C�� u� �� S{�nST S�E Ka�'F U� P�Ne�' f�tE C4t1 t+'�i w'Ov V b t�'r GoNNEd' W rt�
;1�E SI't�E �Y��V arc WA�Lt� l�ch{ Is tmPo�t �tAN r'•
Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations
of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure,
street and neighborhood.
OV � PM4vv►P�`i Gol� Is "Tb �EP 'AtE �cqr��'1�oN ItJ'I�tJE W t TR �t�£.
��SntJ�f O�RiGtK� �vN+� �: ARe�4t�TEGtv�t�� c�t4��CpC�'E�. Ge1�nN�MFs'
-�E F�1rol�tz- SroE w�w+ K.�o�uw� wcw,. �t�h�rE latis �ro�+ct,. T}�£
r+��/�a�s ! U'n:n�'a'''`s �� e� �a�s -r nr�,•s ,���c, 6� s�M��s��t
W tt�1 '� �N ghN� -�or� •
3. How will fhe proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
K� .'f�tG,�c£ /tilE S6��RP�. S�w� lt.�K t�nn6'S o►�'T�£ �Tl��' W ttrt
�-tE Sam� C�utp�l�1 T t��-r6M� 2"e �o�e usf'� �( s) .� nEsl�
W tN. b� P�'� �� -tv fi�lE t�t�rN 6ort}�a�b � F'�!°�t� `br�C9�cNP4. •'
4. Explain how the removal of any trees /ocated within fhe footprint of any new
structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with ihe city's reforestation
requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain
why this mitigation is appropriate.
-t'�1tE ��E' 2 SwtiPr�- �T1PF.F�S pRoPa9Fao �o�R KE�movht•. oNE '1�'�
js lt�'f�'E l�W�6�0�1 ��.�+navA� i5 N�S`Si�Y �dY�`i�'� 11�s'C�./�1�aN' OF
P��Rs a w����c�- oF �vri�-�t �� c�a- �s a� � s�t,�r) .
Q'l-t� "l �MP�-� ��so t�c�r tt si6��E-i �rRT'''MEE) fs 1� �► str�lt�Kb �wn { 5�'FiR.aw�
Rev. 07.2008 � ee ve f ex lanation of bove ue SP CIA� ERMIT APP.FORM
'i�tE {t�s�f �av(�b�rn�. �noVll��- ►T � r��l�'�RY �-r�� �,'e�Pp�S(�tV'.
"'t�-tf�€ � ���-- s�Grr�+cA*tr '�12�.� ar1-r+t£ pi2oP��zt''t ��r Exc��-+�
- �.0�� nl w. R 1r .�C/l�.11vJ C�. =�f'�G
QG�j G�Mg�XZ�,AcNl�
�, CITY
�� : l
��;�,,�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
��A ,.-, � �/ � ��
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARtANCE APPLICATION ��' � � < <01Y
r �r�F ���r�AU� vktZ�NC.�1
-- ;R�_�i`:rn��—
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appticable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
-1�� �i�N�s' 2• S�Ta�.`t �SE -4�tfls � 2'- ( O�� YttGt1T s��
SE��G� . Wk� ¢Op is c.uK�LCr�T" iR.EQ. `-r. G��n 1r�-'i4t�
Ex15'i'►t�tbr WO'R�s J�i' pctZEA OF A�t�►tio�N ts �rn�a,rt'T�iN7' �aY�
Go ;J �l=TLt�CJ{ �'i "tD BLE.N n w ["'tfifi" �-1�-�s't�6r �2 ���' �'�
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the pr�eservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
� l�}." o�s�r' t�r' -7�4-�- �'Lt6t-tr- si� c�uAtit- wov� c+2c�� �,.
v���a-c���rzu� � .�� -t�a,-is r�6r �oNs�sr-�rt- wm�-
-�� o�rtlC�tNA� 0�2 SlM 1�-fZ. tfidV 5F,3 ot�r'"1� b't��-�' -
-�� �tfi�l�,O+R. Spir�s wOV�e BE N��.�c ����-� �'�£ Of�fS�'
vfovtno NQ't' o�'� � NArrv�- a�. �oGtc�- P�� ba�t�'r �
s'naucrwt�� } A-a.�� rt-E-crv�t.- �vrtw�r�-
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
�rt. �(�NIN C� NEw 1.�w5 W R?�F E,X�i STiN�- wILL r'Ravl lo� �+ cI,F,AN fi
GoHE Y� v� E X��F�[SIDIJ I.Ut -t S`�YWC�.�t,l�`G (r w(N. .
�,�e ��t� w ifi�1- '�tE Ex�gt--�G {-�vs� � t�.t 6ft� �k6- ttrv�s o� stt�n .
�� o�1 -(�E S'rRE�. 'Y'K� W iu. �E visu�ki. cottrts�v� �s�s w{i-+'ctt
�! l�l. ( MPIZdVE 'T�ti- �.odj� GF �1�'� '�� � W 1N. MUt �E pEaYt 1 M•L' N't�t.'T�
I°11�� �t�A�-'�� SPtif�^�t + lN�(,�bR,�.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity? ,
`j-� W OM- +,�La� P►vi6(�1w��N'1' w(� MA�"zt� �M tt� i t�nr��s
l K"f � V tU N(t'i fi(N �Ll. l� oK- � �A� N�[� k o+R� G-i r�'/hl� �s O�Qa''SEO�
� N �� Ct� oN w/ t,w t�t�� �� sTi � 2oc�NN F-s � w�w affs��s.
Handouts\Variance Application2008
9�� 3 Lv�`^�EK�A�+10
��;
BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PR�MRosE Ro� • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
( Pc�Rw��.� v�i�c� 1
`�s--d-� � � .� ! � � �►
� �� � �-' %� 2l:`i4
� i . .. . .�_�iv.�]i Af,C
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumsiances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
'i"�t£ �Xts?7NG' 6�� ( s�'1 N Ov�R`3I'7-F�r� 1` C�i'Z UPS-WPK�� �� ��� x t�j� ���.
Gor�ie��-Y 4� ��t 1t��c�-o', �" 1N�cs�u�c �2 �v�-nfr'
2-CP� pA-f�ttvEr. -ra-t�. �r�- 2- p��moN,�ct. �- sr� pi��t�-
Sr�G�s Ir.� -�� PpZo(��,p w��� �2tv��f.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
�{-� (.cx.��z. tk.v�-(. � trt-►utti YZc�M C�c.t� no�s No'C -t�b�� � 1�D"4tZ S�P�I�,pN
�6w► �f-tu�EN � A cw St�r t'S t�-r -f��-+1 C�c,u1 }� B�,pr�Ut j-t4svu�'V�
tT 1 s�EttJG� G�hts I�o�C�iO ON� �'�'�Z WIiZI'OS� D� `�►-Rl� !N(s- CZ�I�!'1'� :
�t w�v�,�o �e IN�F�s�� -t� ��� P� 20' wu�� Z� c� �;A.�ta.�� �-ry
-�1� ��4 $t�N 6� sP1. rr- (,F�vF-1� St�RVG�v�. � f�rt.UfiTGt�l. c,�}�,��,�� uF �
'}�OM� �
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
� � � � ��-t� �� 3 �tZ.oPos�� aFf - ��- pp�K-!G . �Ph�Gg �
wE �oo No"r F-�{. -rHkT ��� (� �w �5E ��'�E.� mnphrx at�r ?�h�
N 61 G� o�+t-�a� o�t �Tv Pu�u� }}�,9,.�{ � S�� as2 (,�q1-���ec� .
d. How wil/ the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and pofential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
-� ���-ni.r� t�►� �r�i Gv�-�r� oN � s�t. �-r— c.E,r�. w/ � 1- c�
G��> �s u�r�r��� w rt� s��--tt��-s oN -� �-.
1�-�P���'T� Gf��:�'t"� �s 1�s wil�. e� v►��sr c�ow�r�n�t,� wH�
N�+C�N-lSe��J �Q~t l,� �� chE�'rtRc��.. N1Ant�rtP�tNUJ�r `�-
�'d1�G' 6�i� (lV�ld.� t3�iV� tJ0 lt�f(��1X Ok (�/1�loS �� �'��'�
Handouts\Vanance Application.2008
(�H�{�F�s � ENI•�-6� G�N� (Mw ii� m�w,�"
ot� "1�1�. 1�nAt�1 p,v1,K. � A�'�PE�+vG� � ��U� (t�a.fmv� 'C'v "C�
.-.,��.�..,.���_ �e..�� '. s��r v�s�u .
451
CUMBERLAND
.Z.r: • ...
� �
�
455
CUMBERLAND
463 467
CUMBERLAND CUMBERLAND
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
��
�
i �, -�
� �
���,
.,-: a':,�.. 4 . a_ . .,
^+�7'��'a��- 'm . , . . ••u. � .
459
CUMBERLAND
�, _..r'� �'� Y� w,~'w�
463
CUMBERLAND
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
� .. � • ��ii
� ~� � � .��
�f - ! �
� ' �
� �� � �'�1 ,f"7�'�
�•• I _ __ I.
•tl' — �'F -
v
�sy� T� -r;-"x`��.�t+� � .a..�� `� .>. �
�"
��r._. . � ,.
. '���.,•, �.1 . k.h,�� .�Y�.�� . ��.i��
a ._ .��"a �'������.•�.� .
471
CUMBERLAND
475
CUMBERLAND
�=���.;.�1!lEr�
i:ti, i? `' l i ! �'�
-, "�UUGAME
�;tJG DIV
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
June 3, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height
envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and
second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463
Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in all previous reviews of this project will apply to
this project.
Reviewed by. Date:6-3-2014
i Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject
Staff Review:
May 28, 2014
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� Parks Division � City Attorney
(650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Request for Design Review, Special Permit for declining height
envelope and Side Setback and Parking Variances for a first and
second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 463
Cumberland Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-163-070
Second Comments:
15. The plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the
property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of the
building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved through other
means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8
The response states: "Inset new 15t and 2"d f/oor walls + 1.5" for 3"-1/2" side yard
setback." Please note that, a/though this is an existing building (home
constructed in 1940) openinqs were never allowed within 3 feet of the property
line. Further, because this building is considered a new building, see comment
#10, all openings must comp/y with the current Building Code.
Provide construction drawings that clearly detail how all openings, existing
windows, new windows, gable end venting, and attic ventilation, will comply with
the Building Code by being placed more than 3 feet from the property line.
NOTE: A written response to item #15 and plans that specifically address item
#15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning
Commission action.
Reviewed by: —= =�� Date: 5-28-2014
J yr, BSJ 50-558-7270
�/
►
.�
�. -..
.. _ ,..._,.. .
._....� _ _..,:,._..,...__. .. _ .. ,..,.., _..,
v
� Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
April 18, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height
envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single
family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1,
Staff Review:
APN: 029-1 u"s-070
April 21, 2014
1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building
Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California
Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing
Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the
Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California
�,�Building Codes.
�.�iAs of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures
to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is
undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and
commercial property btiilt prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at
htt,p•//wwwleginfo ca gov�pubJ09-10jbi11/sen/sb 0401-
045 �sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show
,�pmpliance with this requirement.
�3�lpecify that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency
ote: The California Building Standards Commission has delayed
implementation of the 2013 Energy Codes. If an application is submitted for this
project prior to July 1, 2014 then the project will be required to comply with the
2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards.
4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
�
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
5) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that
require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for
these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning
Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must
submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries,
the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10)This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of
Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any
twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an
existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building
or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new
buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California
Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be
submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation
of any work not specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if
changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by
City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled
and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans.
11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of
Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate
of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No
occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy
s been issued.
2)P vide a complete demolition plan that includes a legend and indicates existing
walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and
new walls and features.
NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will
not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of a�
building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the
project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is
authorized or performed.
13)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
14�Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
�J�-,e plans show that the right side of this structure is less than three feet from the
property line. Revise the plans to show that there are no openings on this side of
the building and that gable end venting and attic ventilation will be achieved
through other means. 2013 CBC §705.8.1 and Table 705.8
16 n the plans specify that the roof eaves on the right side of the building will not
�roject within two feet of the property line.
17 dicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the
property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2013 CBC, Table
602)
18) ooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window
or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and
the net c/ear opening heighf and width of all required egress windows on
= the e/evation drawin s. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310.
19)I dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
20)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
21)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC
§ 1009.
22)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
3)I he fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the
fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the
building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.)
2013 CRC §1003.9.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 2, 3, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re-submitted before
this project can move forward for P � ning Commission action.
ReviewecK��---�""�----�- i -� . �`- Date: 4-22-2014
Joe , �BO - 6 8-7270
Pro�ect Comments
Date:
To:
From:
April 18, 2014
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(s5o) 5ss-73�
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height
envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing sing{e
family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1,
APN: 029-163-070
Staff Review: April 21, 2014
1. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit
from Parks Division (558-7330)
2. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of
tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division
(558-7330). Plans show 3 non-protected trees proposed for removal.
3. Water Conservation in Landscape ordinance not required since landscape will
not be rehabilitated_ Please note on plans.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 4129/14
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
April 18, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558- 7334
BFire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height
envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single
family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1,
APN: 029-163-070
Staff Review: April 21, 2014
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by: � Date: �—1 �./y
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
April 18, 2014
X Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height
envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single
family dwelling at 463 Cumberland Road, zoned R-1,
APN: 029-163-070
Staff Review: April 21, 2014
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 510612014
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
April 18, 2014
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for declining height
envelope for a first and second story addition to an existing single
family dwelling at Cumberland Road, zoned R-1,
APN: 029-163-070
Staff Review: April 21, 2014
1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at:
http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012.
pdf
2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs
. pdf
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD � �
Date: 4/29114
�-��+� CITY OF BURLINGAME
r �a}���t `� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
g�RUNG/�h�E 501 PRIMROSE ROAD10 _ _ �
�a�F� �TT BURLINGAME, CA940 _ __ � - -..`;:'• _
PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 . = .. _ - - .
v,iww.burlingame.org _
Site: 463 CUMBERLAND ROAD
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, JUNE 9, 2014 at
7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review, Special Permit for
declining height envelope, Side Setback Varionce and
Parking Variance for first and second story addition to an
existing single family dwelling at 463 CUMBERLAND
ROAD zoned R-l. APN 026-021-080
Mailed: May 30, 2014
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
PIOYiCE
City of Burlin_qame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)
-; � - } . � _' : N , �^, � ��,■ i ��
w� :���. ' .� , �, .�
� � ��� . �Y , � , , , � , ,
�a�' } ' � �+ . °°�_ �' � �.
� �`` .P' . ► . : c�` ^ , � .;
�� . . 1 � �1� _ s1'• � •7 � .�r'. �,�
�. �,I'.}7� .j11'.
.c 1 , , tk ,� , � r
, �� � '
/ r d�> �
: �. �.' J ,Y `�M'� 4r I �. - � . .
♦ • � . F .. /r�.' ,�. y�.i�!r?'
. � , /� �yl� •s � - � lr j� y � � ��iy. .' "'b
.. ���.�t.,� � -1� �..'7 `ia�%'P ' +� _Ih. 'i' �
i�, v ,�:y `�
� . ` � •�, . .��y�v i .1,, p ��.. .�f d � ,�
���,• :a• �� `'.i' ��w.�:� * f�. i •� .'; , ,••`�r
�(^J)P � �t', ,'?'.k r ^r�i¢ • y.:i� 'r; ' ♦ � v}'.
' '1;"• . . ,�r 'q.� ' t�' p"'�� �•f, c
.,� s,'; ��►" i
.�. , .. �.. r+ i � ' �,' r1�J,'v`
• . . � .. - l � _ , � '`�� / � , . .;.'",� , " + ` t .
� ' � �,'R� , r . ; =j: �,' �.
�' 1• � rF,,��r, , ,��1, �x' f r
`%4 _ _ � , Ft 'R`i` '�' ��, .��, •..,ti. , _
� j�� ,' {v i.i }� ' " +�- ! �., - � �
•*' �: f � t +'r ��e' •. ^.i
G,� � . • . . � � a.e�t . �. � ;� +,�
"� :+�� y. 1sr : 4 � ' . r , / , �
,.
i s�': ��. x •� . n : � ' �G' I -
.T j�F�'.. � ' ,i ..i.. Q � .. . � J ..
u�.. ' �i �}'. e j. 1�"' � )
: �' ' �
r .f �� .� t . •
. '� ���5 .y� �� 1• • ,b` :f
`�.: � Y�� � I .. .i.+
. - �+ �/ :� � o ' `�' ti, � ,�r•'�
' �" �� �. �t 14 , �• .
, d ' t� �' � r � ,y �r k 'r .
� .;�. ' E -� • t �'� �.� • _ . . �� :�/j� : r�y' � .� �, _ � �y.�.
.�j�� t. �Y�� y�+ �' • � ;�s�+.! �', �+e ! .
� /! ;� -�� � . „ * �,:�
}t � � `�.�Y' :�- � l p '.¢ �Ti ^'Yi. t , •'ZJ I iTti.. • 1 '� -�
��i� " �Y"� - / d � ,as. s ��. ��� ..,y� : � � r i � • +i
'��. �.'3 � �� / 1 �� �.^:.«k�
� �� . �, ,�' • , . � _• aatt��, .
R � ��� � �. `�..' ��K!'. _, ;t' � q �! fj '��+�i,-r-oN � . ' o�.
a- } 4� � e«,. -
� l� � � . � �: � ''� rr .
♦� r' '•` , � �:
�� ��� ��� � � .i. �. �
,, , ���,�r: . `� �, � ..1 ; � � �
s :� ' . . ; �' �i ,�r r. '' �� .
� � ,��i,�� ��3;'' �.. ,�. ., . ' , `
`'' -6 � �� �
♦ .' ''_ �. , , � � � ,;:� ',�� .
��
' `� i'�J. � Y _ f�
� �,� _ ti � fa_ � : �
/ • �.� ��r1 ��f , ra r� t '�`'�"'�' �t
._� �, .�� ,� �` , / �N. �l `
_ l� w:: ^�ri`Tf �."�, �� �•, � ��
�. ^ ' i�• ., ,
' >t.�.-� � �sjp��,�_� �� � • ".��( " ,. -e' .q,"��,� .,:�"-
' � � � i 'r,f+A" �-."�'- "'.. �' -� \ „� N � � , J ','� a+^�i. �
� ,- , ���. � t . ` � ,��
a• „�� ST� ' F.� - y •, � } .
'k?r- cs�; �. . ,f ° ;',�a
F. {�� 1' �... �! � . < .,r' • �'tw t •-S�j
� � � � ;��! Y{,!• - � � � ' .i� .�'� �� ' � �" (;
�'� 1 { i �. �� n . �• � � � �
�� ,t � 'l�i. `�, adi F �� ;�i T �. ^�
� ,� �:' 4 ;`� '• ,'r l�� s ? ',,,� '� 1:t� '`
i � if ��• ,:',.y,..�s�j , � �-.
,` � • � ��� �e. � i •�.� '
Y;:" ,► � �: .� .\ ��� �,:'' ��.r
-. ,�t� . .,j` �� �'f',.. • J'..
J �;� " � i,r��. t'I � � �j,
� .y~,. �� -- .1 .�",' - `"i� � ��',�ti +�s „ � �� �q�� .! , '
�,� . � �, :,� ��. �i '4 .��; • ,
. ,:,�r, .��-•. � :�,w � '�
c � . • _r ..�.ti � rf.' � +f
F� � / � J�yi a ��; ,;�,r�
'. r' �.s�' 4 � • .' � � �� ;y � y+ �� ..,a�r
'"� g e
o :.:i �',,� �Y - _ ' � � ' ' � . ` ' ".Y � `• -
.���r.4��+�. .i�� �~ ���� '�' M-' �.
.•s� t. .�,.�� �t '.,� � � � . . � � � ' ' �.
�� 4j�� ► � �` �4�,�, ; � ' ,,�: , �` '�: .
' : �. r +�.+ �r��_;_.� _ ~ . �'� �c�� ` �� � 't ,�`,i • ����� �';� f'.�
�,; :-