The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About438 Cumberland Drive - Staff Reports � � : � `- �'� ^ �3 t �� ,�, � , � �'�� ;� ,�;., � � r�Ti� � � � � ,�"7- r . + �'`.l"� �, Ly <; + �� '"�: , �� • � � z � ,¢ �, .. ! ��. (1 fi�r��'�'�d� �'+��5�. ,+.� a� � FA.�� • . y� r `n ti' �„r �' . � : � � � ..� r � � �� , : ; � '. .j / f �, � � .v ��,, �'� , ��_i ,, � � � � a-� �.= � 4' I ;;�� ar.� . •;.i � �;{ .�.. a�`�' � � J ,��—. •_ � . � ` f "� . . � :� : , R ,. , ... �� .. , .._ ..t... - � --� `\:1�, �YHJ . r^11p1." . 1 `. ��4 �. \,;•, ��','yi � '� ` � • ii .i : . w '� � `'ti • . .� ' �,4.A','M �� Y�� 1 . � � ��ri�� 4 1 .;r ��s. �� .�tip�r��M*V'ti: �K . vy_Sa�.7� �-'^.itmY jid�f'i�k '�� N � � . • � t .Q1,. "4'.. ��.. 2 r� r'' I �' � c � �' � `' . � � � '1� :' ''y � �y'"i' �•,o"')�� ' t •: '•:+a..�,'*'�'� .��i{ 1�}i 1F � :. . r;5-� i,T6Ar... i � t �' d. "J� . ,t• r .F ",�1'� f ", y: ` , � } '.�t�+y. �,,1 �� ;Yjjj'� 1 ?� _ }4,`` . �� _., t,, • �' �'C �;�► ;%'.Rti%:.ir '' ' S� #. i � �• � : ��'':s ,.� . � � � zc � ��X n � a5-. . `� c �Y � . �"1 r `' ' ' i: Na�i " -�,.. _ <�4; '�f � 7 �f . r �`� �I.. � '� } �I �x� � • Y,s;�, ��'ti: ;- .,, �';:�'� r�w t w �C'7 ;��} �N ,�� '. � �.. �./+ r � !" ' r.. '�� :. S �.I,� ,• r S �� . �,�� "' � �� s�� . '� �l 7 �='-� -%1� .?``.� • �'*�`:.'. r i � Tri ?� ^� � � .3+� ,.�."� � , ,�.... �--��' ��..: �r�..'4" ....._.__ .,�... � t ��..•5, City of Burlingame Design Review Item No. Consent Calendar Address: 438 Cumberland Drive Meeting Date: February 9, 2009 Request: Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Designer: Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Design Inc. APN: 029-164-160 Property Owner: Bill Myers Lot Area: 7,535 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The existing finro-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 2,548 SF (0.34 FAR) of floor area and has four bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to remove a rear sunroom and 88 square feet from the rear of the existing garage, add 274 square feet of new floor area to the first floor, and add 482 square feet to the existing second story. With the proposed addition, the floor area will increase to 3,216 SF (0.43 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 3,311 SF (0.44 FAR). The project is 95 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With the addition, the number of existing bedrooms will not change. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site for the four-bedroom house. The proposed one-car garage (10' x 20' clear interior dimensions) meets the covered parking requirement. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5). 438 Cumberland Drive Lot Area: 7,535 SF Plans date stam ed: Janua 28, 2009 � EXISTING I PROPOSED TO ADDN I ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS 1 f' � Front (95t flr): 15'-3" 29'-10" (to master bath) 15'-0" (2"d flr): -- 32'-11" 20'-0" Side (left, 15t flr): 21'-2" (to DR) � (no change) 7'-6" (/eff, 2"d flr): -- -- 7'-6" (right, 95t flr): 11'-4" (to MB) 11'-4" (to master bath) 7'-0" (righf, 2"d flr): 13'-6" (to bath2) 11'-4" (to BR3) 7'-0" __^_ —.._.�_._.___�.....__. .._..----_......._.......�.._�._....�_..�..._._.....__.._.�._..__._....__..��.... ._..�..._.__�._�._ — ._ � Rear (15` flr): 1'-6" (to garage)' i (no change) � 15'-0" (2"d flr): 29'-2" (to BR2 closet) �� 32'-11" (to BR2 closet) � 20'-0" � �� ` � 2,433 SF � 2,262 SF z 3,014 SF Lot Coverage: 32% 30% 40% FAR: 2,548 SF 3,216 SF { 3,311 SF 0.34 FAR 0.43 FAR , 0.44 FAR 3 # of bedrooms: 4 � � 4 --- �. -- -��__._._._.�_�_� ��._._ .....__._�. ..�.....__.__...._... Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') no change � (10' x 20') 1 uncovered � 1 uncovered Design Review 438 Cumberland Drive I EXISTING I PROPOSED TO ADDN I ALLOWED/REQUIRED � (9' x 20') (9' x 20') _.__��_.._�.---_�..�.�:..�___�__�._.�._.��_.___..._._.__.._�.�� ._.___.._.._..._..�._. _��.�.— Heighf: � 20'-7" 25'-0" �30'-0" � DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.28.075 ' Existing noncontorming condition 2 Lot coverage is decreasing overall due to removal of a portion of the existing garage 3 (0.32 x7,535 SF) + 900 SF = 3,311 SF (0.50 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on February 9, 2009, the Commission complimented the design, proposed no changes to the project, and referred the project to the Consent Calendar (February 9, 2009 Planning Commission Minutes). The few comments the commissioners had were addressed by the designer at the hearing and are noted in the minutes. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for Design Review: Based on the findings stated by the Planning Commission in the attached minutes of their February 9, 2009 meeting, that the proposed addition is a good design and well integrated into the existing house, and that since the Planning Commission had no recommendations for improving the design, the project is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 28, 2009, sheets T.O, SP.1, SL.2, DM.1 and DM.2, and A.1 through A.8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 19, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's December 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's December 22, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's December 19, 2008 memo shall be met; -2- CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minutes February 9, 2009 Chair Cauchi opened the public comment period. Jo Ann Gann, 244 Fulton Street, Redwood City; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Provide more detail regarding finishing (trim, roof type, etc.). ■ Complemented the design; massing is done well. ■ Clarify that new finishes will match existing. ■ On the front elevation the existing home has a nice composition; this is lost with the window seat box that is added; consider a shed roof over the bay window centered in the space. ■ Asked if the deck in the rear is being re-built (Gann — yes). Call out new materials for deck. ■ Call out the driveway material; would prefer pavers. Public comments: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke: ■ Good first blush at a design; it is clearly a remodel. ■ Doesn't like the round chimney cap; is it necessary? There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Terrones made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by CommissionerAuran. Discussion of motion: ■ Important to provide more detail; the owner is entering into a contract with the Cify fhat ensures that the project will be built as reflected on the approved plans. Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the mofion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (Commissioner Visfica recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:56 p.m. Commissioner Visfica returned fo the dais. 7. 438 CUMBERLAND DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND BILL MYERS, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated February 9, 2009, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Cauchi opened the public comment period. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue; represented the applicant. Commission comments: 25 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISS/ON — Unapproved Minufes February 9, 2009 ■ Complemented the design. ■ Asked if the entire roof will be new (Geurse — yes). ■ The structure is close to adjacent neighbor to the rear; are the exterior lights new or existing (Geurse — new). Because the structure is so close to the adjacent neighbor, be certain that the lights do not glare onto the neighbor's property. ■ Is there a flat roof section (Geurse — yes, a flat, recessed roof area with a parapet because the massing will work better). Questioned if this is the right solution; the roof is a dramatic part of the design; would still likely be within the height limit (Geurse — thought it may be too large in comparison to other structures in the area). ■ On the balcony on the elevation on page A6, what is the finish over the balcony (Hurin — noted new decorative shed roof with metal bracing). ■ The dormers will be a bold statement; it is important to insist to the builder that they be built as planned with copper roofs. ■ Are wood windows to be installed within the dormers (Geurse — yes). ■ Clarify the design of transom windows. Public comments: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke: Beautiful design, the application should be placed on the Consent Calendar. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. CommissionerAuran made a motion fo place fhe ifem on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Brownrigg. Discussion of motion: Remind the contractor that it is expected that what is being approved will be built. Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vofe 7-0. The Planning Commission's acfion is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:06 p.m. X. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS There were no Commissioner's Reports. XI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Commission Communications: Commissioner Auran's and Commissioner Cauchi's terms on the Commission are up in April. Applications for appointment to the Commission will be accepted through March 16, 2009. Reminder to advise the Community Development Director of attendance at March 21, 2009 annual Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting; and to return any suggestions for topics of discussion to the Director by February 13, 2009. 26 Design Review 438 Cumberland Drive 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Lisa Whitman Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Design, Inc., 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame, CA, 94010 Bill Myers, 438 Cumberland Drive, Burlingame, CA, 94010 Attachments: Minutes from February 9th, 2009 Design Review Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 13, 2008 Aerial Photo -3- � �� I f�. �� I CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNiNG DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 �` CITY �� Bl1RLNOAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �.... Type of application: Design Review � Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: 438 CUMBF�I.AND DRIVE BURLINGAME CALIFORNIA 94010 APPLICANT %k Name: GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC. Address: 405 BAYSWATER AVENUE City/State/Z ip: BURI.INGAME, CA 94010 Phone (w): 650.703.6197 (h�; 650.703.6197 � fl; 650558.9324 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: GEURSE CONCF.PTUAL DESIGN, INC. Address: 405 BAYSWATER AVFNUE City/State/Zip: B�-INGAME,CA94010 Phone (w): 650.703.6197 �h�; 650.703.6197 � fl: 650558.9324 PROPERTY OWNER Name: BII-I-MYERS Address: 438 CUNIBERLAND DRIVE City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME,CA94010 Phone (w): (650) 996-7779 (h): �fl� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �ST + SECOND STORYADDTTION AFFADAVIT/SIGNAT . I hereb 'fy under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and corr ct to tl} est f m knowledge and belief. Applicant's I know about the proposed application to the Planning Property owner's signature:� ' Date: 12/19/08 ind�ti�reby authorize the above applicant to submit this , ]ln.,� F��:��'�� ''' �/ d� �3%� Date: 12/19/08 m. i ' � ; � � � 2008 � PCAPP.FRM CITY O� aI.�RLINGAME PLA��NING D[FT. � �� Project Comments Date: To: ❑ City Attorney From: Subject: Staff Review: December 18, 2008 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Request for Design Review for first and second story addition at 438 Cumi�erland Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 029-164-160 December 22, 2008 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Di��ision at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Date: 12/22/2008 Reviewed by: V \� •� 4 Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: December 18, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review for first and second story addition at 438 Cumberland Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 029-164-160 December 22, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 5) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shal! be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2007 California Building Code for new structures. 6) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 7) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 8) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. . �` �, • 9) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non-residential buildings. Go to http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. 10)Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 11)On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line. 12)Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire-resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one-hour fire-resistance-rated construction per CBC 704.2. 13)Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (Table 602) 14)On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with Table 704.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 15)Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. 16)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 18)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 19)The fireplace chimneys must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 Reviewed by: - D e: 1��9�8 �� ,_,�...�..� Project Comments Date: December 18, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Subject: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist . (650) 558-7279 d Fire Marshai (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Request for Design Review for first and second story addition at 438 Curriberland Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 029-164-160 Staff Review: December 22, 2008 Project Comments Date: �� From: Subject: Staff Review: December 18, 2008 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7279 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ----------...._ � NPDES Coordinator 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Request for Design Review for first and second story addition at 438 Cumberland Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 029-164-160 December 22, 2008 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Include a list of BMPs and an erosion and sediment control measures plan, as project notes, when submitting plans for a building permit. Please see attached brochures for guidance. For additional assistance, contact Kiley Kinnon at (650) 342-3727. Reviewed by: Kiley Kinnon �� Date: 12/19/08 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Desipn Review for a first and second story addition to an existinq single family dwellinq and attached qaraqe at 438 Cumberland Drive, zoned R-1, William Myers and Cheri McGilvery, property owners, APN: 029-164-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 23, 2009, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, Section 15301(e)(1) of the CEQA guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23�d dav of Februarv, 2009 by the following vote: Secretary , 1 ' EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Design Review 438 Cumberland Drive Effective March 6, 2009 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped January 28, 2009, sheets T.O, SP.1, SL.2, DM.1 and DM.2, and A.1 through A.8; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 19, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's December 22, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's December 22, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's December 19, 2008 memo shall be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: . L • 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. , , . CITY OF BURLINGAME F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �� y�� ' s,� = BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � ' "" ' PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650} ,,� �' - www.burlingame.org � :sr•�,� :� � a -+�e-.�c±�; : � g �`� �� y ��',�'`�-t � '._- y� •. T Site: 438 CUMBERLAND DRIVE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission annaunces the following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2009 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling at 438 CUMBERLAND DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 029-164-160 Mailed: February 13, 2009 (Please refer to other side) Q1��io54432� �� i k:gjt3Y' �fom Ct4ij jfJ �� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Ci#v of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the;notice or in written correspondence, delivered`to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who`receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker �� Community Development birector PUBLIC HEARIPIG NOTICE (Please refer to other side)