HomeMy WebLinkAbout1250 Jackling Drive - Staff Report (3)City of Burlingame
Special Permif to Reduce On-site Parking
Address: 1250 Jackling Drive
Request: Special Permit to reduce on-site parking.
Applicant and Designer: Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design
Property Owners: Lisa and Gregory Ott
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 027-322-040
Lot Area: 6,970 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions
to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase
of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
Project Description: The subject property is a corner lot with frontage on Vancouver Avenue and Jackling
Drive. The driveway entrance on Jackling Drive leads to an attached 2-car garage.
In 1977, the Planning Commission granted a front setback variance to the property for a workshop area to be
built at the left side of the existing attached garage. The variance granted allowed the house to have a 7'-0" front
setback where 15'-0" was the minimum required setback.
The current application proposes a primarily interior remodel to the existing house that will eliminate the garage
workshop and reduce the size of the covered parking area in the attached garage. The footprint, setbacks, lot
coverage, and floor area of the existing house will not be altered. The applicant is requesting a special permit to
reduce the number of on-site parking spaces.
The proposed interior remodel will increase the number of bedrooms from 3 to 4. The municipal code requires
that single-family dwellings with 4 or fewer bedrooms have a total of 2 parking spaces (1 covered space plus 1
uncovered space). The existing house exceeds the number of required parking spaces because it has 3 parking
spaces (2 covered spaces plus 1 uncovered space).
With the proposed remodel, the workshop area in the garage will be eliminated and converted to covered
parking. A new bedroom, bathroom, and laundry room are proposed in a portion of the former attached garage.
The net result is that the covered on-site parking will be reduced from 2 non-conforming covered parking spaces
(17'-6" x 20', where 18' x 18' is required for 2 existing covered parking spaces) to 1 code-compliant parking
space (10' x 20'). The single uncovered parking space in the driveway leading to the garage (9' x 20') will
remain, though some existing ground cover landscaping will be paved to allow a vehicle approach to the new
garage door.
Planning staff would note that if an application was made in the future to increase the number of bedrooms from
4 to 5, current code regulations would require that the applicant provide a total of 3 parking spaces on site, 2
covered and 1 uncovered.
From the exterior, the proposed interior changes will result in the two-car garage door being reduced to a single-
car door and the garage door entry will be shifted to the left. Few of the exterior changes will be visible from the
street because of the existing hedges at the edge of the property and because of the side-facing orientation of
the attached garage.
The project includes several additional minor exterior changes, however these changes do not raise existing
plate heights and do not require design review or any other Planning Commission applications.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
Item No. 8c
Regular Action Item
Meeting Date: February 22, 2016
■ Special Permit to reduce on-site parking (C.S. 25.26.035)(b)).
Special Permit 1250 Jackling Drive
Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that since this request for a Special Permit does not include any
change to the footprint of the existing house, the application was placed directly on the action calendar. If the
Commission feels there is a need for more discussion, this item may be placed on a future action calendar for a
second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant.
See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and
Stormwater Division. Planning Staff would note that all of the circled comments from the other Divisions have
already been addressed by the applicant under a separate Building Permit (#B15-0476) that has been approved
but not issued. Should the Planning Commission approve the application for a Special Permit, the revisions to
the plans and the comments from the Divisions will be incorporated as a revision to the existing Building Permit.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the
following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or
addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is
appropriate.
Special Permit Findings (Reducing On-site Parking): That the proposed single-car garage complies with the
code requirements for the proposed 4- bedroom house, that the landscaping eliminated to retain the uncovered
parking space in the driveway is minimal, that the proposed remodet will not substantially alter the envelope of
the existing residence, and that the reconfiguration of the garage door will not be visible from the street due to
the existing landscaping and the side-facing attached garage, the project may be found to be compatible with the
special permit criteria listed above.
Planning Commission Action:
The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and
the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning
Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any
action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be
considered:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
February 8, 2016, sheets A1 through A3.1;
2. that if the structure is altered at a later date and the number of bedrooms is increased, then the Special
Permit, as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here, will become void;
3. that the conditions of the Engineering Division's January 19, 2016 memo, the Building Division's January
20, 2016 memo, the Parks Division's January 19, 2016 memo, the Fire Division's January 27, 2016
memo, and the Stormwater Division's January 25, 2016 memo shall be met;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
-2-
Special Permif 1250 Jackling Drive
5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shal�
require a demolition permit; and
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Erika Lewit
Senior Planner
c. Tim Raduenz, applicant
Attachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Special Permit Form
Photographs of existing front elevation
Staff Comments
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed February 12, 2016
Aerial Photo
-3-
+��• ' '
@VRLIM1IGAME
�.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: bZ7 �' .��' 7i7i � i��
❑ Conditional Use Permit � Special Permit � Zoning / Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: � �� �� ly(�211i�
... .
- �/� L1:. �� /l/
�.. - _r� �� — ��
� � � ♦ /
- - • �. G� . .i
. � _ ��r � ���
� � � - .. -� ,. , r .i
'x� �� �1.1
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: l�� . f- /''� �5. ��2� ��
Address: /�`U �1��'L%�l� ��2/✓�
2
City/State/Zip: �f/f�LlN � ���1�
Phone
E-mail
/DESIGNER
Name: -}� Onl� � �-O l�(�� Z
Address: �S� � ?, L�-'i�' S� . . � �'C
City/State/Zip: �� ���'�i.�0 , � 9����
Phone: �tl,�l' - ��• 1330�
E-mail: Tnl� � �JA�ID+�b�S((�.C.�l�(
Burlingame Business License #: � gd�
� � i .
r �c� � �r i � :✓
' �/ �
Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans:
I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request andlor post plans submitted with this
application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City
arising out of or related to such action. `�%Q. (Initials of�Designer)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and beli f. � (
Applicant's signature: � Date: Z � �
I am aware of the proposed appli atio and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission. —
Property owner's signature: Date: � Z' �
,..'� � -.� ��, ; �x� ,
� �..:� :� �.,�' � �. � �� � ��
Date submitted:
c �Q
S: �H,4�ND(JU�75�PC Application`dd�
;;? �� nr- BI.iR!_INGAP��
City of Burlingame • Community Development Department � 501 Primrose Road • P(650) 558-7250 • F(650) 696-3790 • www.burlinpame.orq
�
BURIINGAME
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, sca/e and dominant structural characteristics of the
new construcfion oraddition are consistent with the existing sfructure's design and
with the existing street and neighborhood.
`.�� �
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exferior finish materials and elevations
of the proposed newstructure oraddition are consistent with the existing structure,
street and neighborhood.
�� -����i�
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
I . � �.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees /ocafed within the footprint of any new
structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation
requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain
why this mitigation is appropriate. � �� �� ��
s�
� ���������
�
,-Ar,; � � 2or �
:;i"i�! O� BURLfiVG�1Mr
�,0� r�i Ai�JNIP� C; �' V
Rev. 07.2008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.AP�.��RM
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural
characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with
the existing structure's design and with the existing street and
neighborhood.
Neighboring properties will not be affected by 1250 Jackling going from a
two car garage to a one car garage. There is no change to the footprint,
height or bulk of the house. Externally, it will be only a cosmetic change to
the size of the garage door. The property is on a corner lot and the ranch
style house is an "L" shape. The current one door garage faces into the lot, so
even when the change is made, it will hardly be noticeable from the street or
to the neighboring homes.
We are very excited to move to Burlingame with our three children. Instead
of adding another story to this house as the next door neighbor did,
converting one stall of the garage will allow us to add a fourth bedroom and
create living space for our family.
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and
elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the
existing structure, street and neigh6orhood,
The change we are requesting is to reduce the two car garage to a one car
garage. Effectively, it is just changing the size of the garage door. Because we
are choosing not to go up or out, the roofline will not change. The exterior
changes will remain consistent with the existing style of this mid-century
rancher, including the garage door, with the rest of the house and
neighborhood. In fact, the current fa�ade is actually a little jumbled. This
change will make it look more fluid and integrated. Aesthetically, this update
will make the home feel more consistent with the neighboring homes and the
updates happening across the Easton Addition.
How will the proposed project be consistent with the
residential design guidelines adopted by ihe city?
Unlike many homes in the area, 1250 Jackling has a very large and wide
driveway. When we reduce to a one stall gararge, we will still have ample
room for our two cars in the driveway. This means there will not be
additional cars parking on the street or clogging the neighborhood. In fact,
the driveway is not only large enough for our cars, but also up to two more.
The location of this home is also unique because it is on a corner lot, and the
backside of the house on Vancouver creates a relatively long stretch of open
street parking on the west side of the stree� Unlike other areas of the
neighborhood, the homes in the immediate vicinity are not as d`�h�� t�� �.^: � 1:
�
� � � ,�., � �eu, �,,.
� r� �� "+ `� � C; I ly�
iY Q�= �SUR!_fl:Gr`+iVl�
��•:.,�-'�i_^.hJ��1PdG i�1'�J
instance, with the orientation of the home at 1236 Vancouver, along with the
set back of 1265 Vancouver means there is really only one home in the first
stretch of Vancouver south of Easton Ave, and ample street parking.
In searching for our house, we saw many homes in the neighborhood with
long narrow driveways that you could not really even pull a single car into,
and streets tightly packed with cars. One thing that attracted us to this home
was the lower density in this particular area, and the wide driveway. That is
what makes it easy to see how having a one car garage instead of a two car
garage will have no impact on parking or traffic in the neighborhood.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the
footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What
mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain
why this mitigation is appropriate.
No trees will be removed. We will re-locate the current hedge and move it
over to accommodate the side of the new door, but otherwise the current
landscaping will not really change at all. The beautiful tree in front and the
overall landscaping are things that attracted us to this home and we will not
be altering it.
�����������
���,; � � � �i c�
�;�
�..� �,r o�� �.� ��a;_,r�Ua�,7L
;i�D-!�i !`,f�1;�iiJ';a iJi�!
� � �K � � �� S� �
� ���
�nr� : L
��,.��
�-i ;�,� p- BURI_INGA�AE
:;�Dt;-�}LA^JNi�lG DIV
Project Comments
Date:
�.
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
January 19, 2016
� Engineering Division
(650) 558- 7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558- 7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558- 7204
Planning Staff
Request for Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces
on site at 1250 Jackling Drive, zoned R1, APN: 027322040
January 19, 2016
� There is not enough project data to perform a Stormwater Division Review.
Some information needed is site plan, lot size, existing lot coverage and floor
area and proposed floor area and lot coverage. Please resubmit with this
information.
2. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the
City's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater
pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement
appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases
of construction including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit,
please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a
separate full size (2'x3 or larger) plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is
available at http://www.flowstobay.orq/Construction.
Reviewed by: C�r Cyn Cri����
< � c��
Date: 1/25/2016
Project Comments
Date:
�
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
January 19, 2016
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Request for Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces
on site at 1250 Jackling Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-322-040
January 19, 2016
1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building
Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical
Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all
amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Plaruling Commission has not
approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must
comply with the 2016 California Building Codes.
2) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be
replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing
alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial
property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at
http://www.leginfo.ca.�ov,[�ub/09-10/bill/sen f sb 0401-
0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered.html. Revise the plans to show
compliance with this requirement.
3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy
Efficiency Standards.
Go to http://www.energv.ca.gov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details.
4) Provide two completed copies of the attached Manc�atory Measzsres with the submittal of
your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this
completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference
� that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found.
5) Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weelcdays: 7:00 �.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 �.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municip�l Code, Section 13.04100 for details.)
Constructio�z lioccrs in tlie City Public rig/it-of-wuy are limited to tiveek�lays and non-
City Holirlays between 8:00 a.ni. and S: DO p.m.
Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included
on the plans.
6) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require
work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may
require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The
building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for
any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the
work.
7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
8) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to,
and approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not
specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field,
without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning
Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is
� not shown on the Approved plans.
� 9) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy
`% will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be
issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until
a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
NOT�: A condition of this project �pprov�tl is that the Demolition Permit will not be
issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of an building
components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property
o�vner is responsible for assuring that no worlc is authorized or performed.
10 When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a
completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition
Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
11) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected,
will comply with 2013 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the
openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed.
12 RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one
window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for
sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress
requirements. Oi2 tlae elevation dra►vin�s specify tlie locntioiz and tlre net clear ope�ziiz;
hei;lit and widt/i of a![ reqcrired egress windows. 2013 California Residential Code
(CRC) §R310.
13) ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
14) pecify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood-burning device. If the
fireplace is a solid wood-burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will
meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood-burning device.
15 If the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace
chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten
feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2013 CRC § 1003.9.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that speciiically address
items 1 through 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move for-ward for
Planning Commission action. The written resnonse must include clear direction
re�arding where the requested information c�n be found on the plans.
�—
Revie�ved by:_��� � 20 Date: l l��1 ���f�'
Rick Caro III, CBO 650-558-7270
Project Comments
Date:
January 19, 2016
To: � Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
Planning Staff
X Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Request for Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces
on site at 1250 Jackling Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-322-040
January 19, 2016
No comments at this time.
Reviewed by: Christine Reed �� G��-� �
Date: 1-27-16
Projec# Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
January 19, 2016
� Engineering Division
(6.50J 55�7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(S5t)) 558�-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Request for Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces
on site at 925fl Jackting Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-322-040
January 19, 2016
% 1� Existing site plan shows only 2 lar�dscape tree.
lJ Include one (1) 24' box landsca p e tree to pro posed site plan.
Reviewed by: BD
Date: 1/19/16
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
January 19, 2016
X Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Request for Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces
on site at 1250 Jackling Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-322-040
January 19, 2016
�,�he existing site plan does not represent what is actually on the property.
�� Please revise and dimension the driveway approach. Please show the
location of the existing mailbox adjacent to the electrical pole. Please show
the landscape and hardscape as existing.
Reviewed by: M. Quan
Date: 1/19/16
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for a Special
Permit to reduce the number of on-site parkinq spaces at 1250 Jacklinq Drive, Zoned R-1, Lisa and
Greqory Ott, propertv owners. APN: 027-322-040;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
February 22, 2016, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence
that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical
exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions
to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result
in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby
approved.
2. Said Special Permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Findings for such Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said
meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
�, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 22nd dav of Februarv, 2016 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Special Permit
1250 Jackling Drive
Effective March 3, 2016
Page 1
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped February 8, 2016, sheets A1 through A3.1;
2. that if the structure is altered at a later date and the number of bedrooms is increased, then
the Special Permit, as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here, will become
void;
3. that the conditions of
Division's January 20,
Division's January 27,
shall be met;
the Engineering Division's January 19, 2016 memo, the Building
2016 memo, the Parks Division's January 19, 2016 memo, the Fire
2016 memo, and the Stormwater Division's January 25, 2016 memo
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Buifding and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
. CITY OF BURLINGAME
� ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
� � BURLINGAME, CA 94010
''i PH: (650) 558-7250 o FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 1250 JACKLING DRIVE
The fity of Burlingame Planning Commission annaunces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22,
2016 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall Council Chambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application far Special Permit to reduce the number af on-
site parking spaces for an interior remodel at
1250 JACKLING DRIVE zoned R-1. APN 027-322-040
Mailed: February 12, 2016
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
Ciiv of Burlinqame
A copy of the � p eli Colmmun�y Dev lopmenp Departmenb at 501 Prirr�po�e to
the meeting a
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners �vho receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional inforrnation, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC 1-9E�Ft1iVG P1Ol'ICE
(Please refer to other side)
�I � ��� � � ; �; , �� � .
N�, � � �•� `. �� � .�` : . � s` ` OlL ,4� �b�2 � � Z/ � ' u/, b�
�yF �' �y i`:. jj �. L ^ \ / 4 � �.. `'� L r t t � �-Ei,�'
�`J ��r � . �~� � ////y � ' �• .. �!'�, f d4' t � `�, ' �° ir� �'y r
/ "� \�� �`�� � � * r � „�� \^� ���� •v;t o0 3� �. `�� � - � r � .' � �
� - ffi. - "�'�� � `� �+�... � 8� � �� �,t �, r �,w�°� x ..^`� a'`�'' .. r /';
�. � �.. "`... f
�:- 8�rty�..� } � � , '�.� ,pl�� �'� r `� �� , � N
�
� r \ ���" �, L2, \ ,.:` � .� ��\ � �� �,` �
" �' vB' t \. � �. �� r�'%`' /" r.
� ' � -,, ,� �°�'r �_ _ ``-� �'` . y �'� :. "�� ��►� � , � �� � � �
1 Er „�,,,,, -�' �, � �� / i �,, �a« ,, ``� � �#" � � , s
„� `� k � ;T� ��,% - ., � f ` �%� � . �` +�id., c
i�+.\.'\ k,�� '� w� � f � +�\ • �2' �, A � i i q�r`�.., \ L��• / ��. �n,\\ . �iy� f .
'�' , v �{ � � %1
� �� �,,,a �§ .. ��.,� � / .,, �, ; /�� . � � � � � : � '•.\
!� � �� �Q'� � � Br � / � �� rr� �
, •
� r�' 7 "� �„s �'� �' � ; `� �1 `�r' ,� y, ' � ' � � �.. \ �•..� /'
. � � ,
\ � # :� � r* �,e� �s� '� . ,' �' � `'� -d� � � , .` � � V ,_
.` -�� � _ y '�+� ,`
/ ! � � ' '*� �� � `i �� , �`► � � _. , � �.':, d�, �
�o .`Y f" < " ✓ `r* sFr�` � � / ~` � ?�L �'��`• �,f`*�g a�v � F +s \ �� �Lr �' �
N �'' � �k �; '� ��� / �..\ ,��, �� ��4�� �� � a ��%
t. w °si;a ,t � *� ��� � �� �- '� \� / .
���y� � ._�' •,�. / %' , . . : �t „ � Y��.e,. ��' * ��
/ �t -�/ � . � s � N !' � �,, � a��: <1 .,,; a: ��•., *�,< >, (r
. ..
� � �'
/ � y� ��� `�e�' ��... Cr� ``.� �G��' � -� , \��
� � ! ,` , r��..a .
�/ �`` � �� '� `� �� � � � n
�� . �' �` \..� �� � " _ ��` �'�:,. � � �s ���� � � f�;
'` ' � � ' . � rz N � �z
� ..: .,� /_ ' ' t� b . -.;. . � .
wr �,� �� �����u
, I a� � ',/ _ ��,��'tt'^� ` T '.x s ' .` t z.` ; f�,.,� �
�M1' � a f +»�" `�` �� � -`\.
.� R� :s j �� ' 1., ��,. [ � • (�/'
�. � � ; . �'`��\� , �' � . \ � . ' ��'' �`a,
� � � � . , '� . �,,; � � � . a . . �`� .
,
� � � ` � �` �`"�'4` ��"� j �'' � �-_ z � f �-
� � �,< � s�,� J �� - � ��'�,� + , . .
� � �� � ���,. , , ` e„ - � / ' ` � j ! z ,'
r � 0 n � $ 2, �'
. h ° ...., �
,� �+' �p'�N � � �a� ,� j ��f ` � ��
1�, � ,'4� ��41 �.r� �� � . L . . � ';, ;! .
; o_ �s' . ,� � i -£� . , .
„`"-__ I `� a � ,�h'''v. ` . ��z� //���` ``�,,. ^.. i� ! �.
�' w jff 4 ' � / ., , � `� r,� �» �'-a. i
o - �iy J// < � � ,.,,:,�"'. � - .:'�` �: '�. i
O � � "P ,' /n '`,.,,, � '�c-. ' .�
ry - � , t y0 �` i b . • . � ``�
5-.. s�9�r ,. �.
�ti rt , � �� � � l�� �;
- � � U �� • �r`/�� �) � M�;
.,e. y„ � ' p � z � �` � � .
,
.a r;. ' �. � � v�. "� -'�s � / �
�.. .., - ,- . /
� ,
» ,
x
w'�•, '.:.r_^+i^,.^y3u.^ i'� - !.�` ; . ,� i � ,rk E � _.. . .. ' �•i� . �;�
�
"P` �
.,. C�
..
, 1 �, LIC��'N��I'kJY/ _ . 'JtSy ��.0
� � �^' ,�^� H �::� �2- .�, o
*�s,r � �`jw � ��„� � $ ... ----,-�� ��;�� ��P' cer
i * ,�� ��'�,.
� � 4 ��" Y � '*`.-� y, � ��� `
�� z �' ` °r - r;,� � -_ � �:�� y,�„� ���-+i�.. �'•� d''%'° S� �I
w �i N _
N � '� 4 �i�#' � � � � �'h'
�o ' � ``` � Sg,�� �� � % �� � •,` ,� ���y0"Nb
ry .a �,, ,,., \ ;�� �4 �7 .. `�.'`,,. ,��t�e ,� `Jb'�,
/ � 4'`� ' `' �'='`"'�.
�'r _ e�;� «% � / \ '� �° ��\ c"�' � ^ '% � "�` � � - � =--,:.
� � � �'"n. � a' . �'� �� �� � � ...
! �vy �-� ,� :., -.. � � i/' `� \�� *R` � l o ..
�( ': ,:�� � � f ' . � \; ��''-V ' y �\ /,,.. w � �� i \ '
��`\ ,f s � 'Y�- / »:..�r j�. s `� `� w " � � �''�\ � � `� ��$p ;� 1,\.
., ..
. �.� ..' . .-- .� !r �'���,�.,jd r � \� � ,'�� � ' .. �.. . ��-�� � o ` �:�, :`\
� �;
� �. � �� ����.;:�..� \ i f � P;�$ i r
�
.
. � \ �'i �. j � 0 - F � `�, / i� � = '�
i , u. '� / �k � m �-'_:.
� r �, \ "' '� ` '�°= � `�1r � ,% , , ,, _. i
�- / R: � % '� � �! \ `� r � � i , t ;
�� �` � � � � ��.�� � �;.
�. , �Aw%�; n � `•� w �
�� �`� . � , �/ R w �„- _. 4':,�- .*,r � .eS. /� 1
� rn�+�` \� -r*'1 �\ -k ty��` j .. �` � .� � �
1 � � , � J � f-
; �� � � �� � \; f,, f 'w �,^ / �� � �� 1� xi � \
`� . �, . , .� j ` � • , �.:
~\�.��:��� ` " J'. 1,.:.. \•\• � ^'� � /�� .w � , � ' �, - i y�� ..
• '"• ''� � � '/�� r .. � � � - � ' _.:. / . s,.- ';`- ! w
. l �^r -�a� ����,�
� .
� �t �'\ T . � ` c+����� �` i� - /� R.'"� � �� � �i` � .'� - � ��1 , �
�` � i c , ��,,�cr l �u .� . _ . . �i � �` � � � � �
�`,. . �� ± � � .,� - �"��. ��.;-_. r � ` i' � , yn _ 3 � /.+ , ..,�.A. /4 , � �`;
'R. . , //�`� • �,�'� `� � ? � ' b .7 �'�",- ro ' � `y b�,-
,'� 4 "� �;, �f! �^ \ : �r "� �'�, �Q'��,�� o �3 _ ,� _ dp �s``� , % ' � `k �.'� ` ; a
.�: _.. .,( � .�� - . '+z :r. i..�. 5/�.:,� O f . \'. �Y ��:.�M+,. l�l
�.\ . .r" �/ \. e, '-� i � �+O'� �'°�" i � � ry~ �',� • �a.:�':�Q � _ r i� i L+ �