The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1244 Jackling Drive - Staff ReportbK- �e! t�C� � �� Z�I �`� �� BURLINGAME � CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM DATE: July 22, 2009 � FROM Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner �� .� ., . �= ta�v. zun,s (�'!N/!//N(l!I �fI%/%/IIAN Director's Report Meeting Date: July 27, 2009 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 1244 JACKLING DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review was approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 2008 for a second story addition at 1244 Jackling Drive (October 14, 2008 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). The Planning Commission also reviewed and approved an FYI for window changes along the front elevation at their meeting on April 13, 2009. A building permit was issued on May 29, 2009, and construction is currently underway. On July 10, 2009, the applicant submitted an FYI to extend the roofline from the existing first floor ridge to the new second floor ridge as seen from the rear and left side building elevations, to remove a window from the new second story bathroom at the rear elevation, to add one new window in the garage wall along the left side elevation and to add a skylight above the attic space off the master bedroom addition. The applicant states that these changes were done to provide better drainage from the roof along the second story bathroom wall, to create more storage space within the attic area and to allow more daylight within the existing garage. Because of the added wall area along the left side elevation and because of the addition of a skylight, an FYI is required for Planning Commission review. There are no other changes proposed to the project. The proposed changes are outlined in the attached letter from the applicant. Also attached are the originally approved and proposed site plan, second level floor plan, rear elevation and left side elevation drawings, date stamped July 10, 2009. Planning staff would note that because of these minor revisions, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner Cc: Colaine and Bob Roepke, 1244 Jackling Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010, property owners. James Skelton, 120 Manor Drive, San Francisco, CA 94127, designer. ATTACH M E NTS: Explanation letter from designer, date stamped July 15, 2009 Approval Letter, dated October 27, 2008 October 14, 2008 Planning Commission Regular Action Minutes Originally approved and proposed site plan, second level ftoor plan, rear elevation and left side elevation drawings, date stamped July 10, 2009 July 7, 2009 Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: FYI for 1244 Jackling Drive Dear Members of the Planning Commission, This letter is to inform you that there has been a change in the design for the previously approved project for the Roepke residence at 1244 Jackling Drive. Planning Commission approval of the Design Review application became effective on October 24, 2008. The application was for a second story addition to an existing single family dwel�ing. Since the approval the following changes occurred requiring planning commission review: 1. Extended the roofline from the existing ridge to the top of the new ridge to include part of the new east bathroom wall. 2. Removed bathroom window from east wall. 3. Added one new window to the first floor north garage wall. These changes were done to provide better drainage from the roof along the east bathroom wall, to create more storage space within the attic, and to allow more daylight within the garage. It is our belief that these changes maintain the overall appeal and design intent of the home. Sincerly, James Skelton EDIT LLC , ,_, : .. � � �:.. ��.. �,.� . i� ;.» Jl�!_ k �i 2009 �.I I Y O� "r_:Ur;I.IfJuAME_ i'I r�NNli�!C� fii=!'"f . CITY OF BURLINGAME City Hall — 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010-3997 October 27, 2008 James Skelton, EDIT 3564 17th Street Suite 3 San Francisco, CA 94110 Re: 1244 Jackling Drive Dear Mr. Skelton, � C�r a;��; .., . ,� ::, �� -� � * 'v�,� ` � qO 44�ow1areC� w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division PH: (650) 558-7250 FAX: (650) 696-3790 Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the October 14, 2008, Planning Commission approval of your application for Design Review became effective October 24, 2008. This application was for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1244 Jackling Drive, zoned R-1. The October 14, 2008 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 28, 2008, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1 and L1.1, and date stamped August 13, 2008, sheets A3.2 and A3.3; 2, th2t any �hanaes t� hu�!��r.9 materials; exterior finishes; windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and ameunt or type of hardscape materials shall be s��ject to Planr:ng Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning JLQII � 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include addirg or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's June 18, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's June 25, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 23, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's June 22, 2008 memo shall be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; �� Register online to receive City of Burfingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org �� October 27, 2008 1244 Jackling Drive Page 2 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires afFected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burfingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDfTION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural cerfification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Reimbursement of the Design Review deposit will be processed and will be mailed to the property owner under separate cover. All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year. �F Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burfingame.org �� October 27, 2008 1244 Jackling Drive Page 3 The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. Sincerely, William Meeker Community Development Director c. Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (0.18 AC MOL LYING ADJ TO NLY COR OF LOT A OF REYNOLDS WOODS SUB AREAGE CITY OF BURLINGAME; APN: 027-332-030) Colaine and Bob Roepke, property owners 1244 Jackling Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Chief Building Official, Community Development Dept./Building Division File e: Register online to receive City of Burlingame e-mail updates at www.burlingame.org �� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes October 14, 2008 7. 1244 JACKLING DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JAMES SKELTON, EDIT, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND COLAINE AND BOB ROEPKE PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated October 14, 2008, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. James Skelton, 3564 17th Street, San Francisco; Bob Roepke, 1244 Jackling Drive and Mike Nilmeyer, 128 Pepper Avenue; represented the applicant. Considered shade and priva�y ir�pacts of ne;gh�crs; looked at these impa�ts and dPtermined th�t there were no shade and shadow impacts. Commission comments: Asked if there was there an aesthetic study of the change in the roofline (Skelton — no, applicant's didn't want to make change). Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Rotation of the gable would create a more visual impact upon the neighbors; would add to mass along the Cockcroft's side of the properly; can support as designed; still some concern regarding wrought-iron railing. • Original proposal is the right way to go. ■ There was not a fair evaluation of the alternatives; the study that was done was not done in earnest. ■ No shadow evaluation of the rotated aable was performed; could havz a lesser impact upon the neighbor; could be looked at a bit more closely. C�rnrnissioner L�ndstr�rr� moved t� aa�ro�✓� th.e applicatio.n, h�i racnlirfinrl �Rijt/7 �hg fnll�iniin� r�nClr�lOI1S: that the project shall be built as shown on the p►ans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 28, 2008, sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1 and L1.1, and date stamped August 13, 2008, sheets A3.2 and A3.3; 2. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes io the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's June 18, 2008 memo, the City Engineer's June 25, 2008 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 23, 2008 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's June 22, 2008 11 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes Ocfober 14, 2008 memo shail be met; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to complywith all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7, that all air �ucts, plumbing vents, ar�� flues �ha{I �e c�mbined, �vhere possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by CommissionerAuran. Discussion of motion: Commissioner Brownrigg agreed with Commissioner Vistica's comments regarding the lack of analysis of the alternatives; not in favor of application at this time. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on fhe motion and itpassed 5-2 (Commissioners Vistica and Brownrigg dissenting). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:11 �.m, 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes October 94, 2008 Commissioner Yie recused herself from participating regarding Item 8 since she lives within 500-feet of fhe property and is working with the applicant; she left the Council Chambers. 13