HomeMy WebLinkAbout1525 Bernal Avenue - Staff Report� � ar
MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM; CITY PLANNER
� i:�/�_
P.C. 6/22/87
Item # 2
SUBJECT; SPECIAL PERMIT TO ENLARGE AN EXISTING GARAGE TO
522.5 SF AT 1525 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1
Sandra Aguirre, resident and property owner, is requesting a special
permit in order to enlarge the existing 356 SF (18'-9" x 19') detached
garage in the rear third of her lot to 522.5 SF (27'-6" x 19') (500 SF
maximum allowed) in order to provide for more space to park and for
more storage (Code Sec. 25.60.010-b). The existing garage and proposed
addition are in the rear 30� of the lot, therefore subject to the
requirements of the accessory structure ordinance.
Staff Review
City staff have reviewed the request. The Fire Marshal (May 26, 1987
memo) had no comments. The City Engineer (June 1, 1987 memo) had no
comments so long as the expansion did not include the extension of
sewer and water service to the detached garage. The Chief Building
Inspector (May 13, 1987 memo) notes the code requirement for one hour
construction within three feet of property line.
In her letter (May 10, 1987) Sandra Aguirre states that she would like
the expansion of the garage in order to compensate for the lack of
storage in her small (1,350 SF) house. She feels that by this
remodeling she will be providing a legal garage and improving the
construction of the side and rear of the building. From the front, she
notes, there will be no change in appearance; this will preserve the
existing brickwork. The lot backs onto a 10' city easement. She asks
to be exempt from a site survey since they are extending the existing
wall of the garage. She also states the existing garage foundation is
one foot from property line; the new rear wall will be 1'-3" from
property line. Her rear property line lines up with the rear lot lines
of her neighbors.
Study Questions
At their meeting on June 8, 1987 the Commission reviewed this
application for an oversized garage. The applicant submitted a letter
dated June 9, 1987 addressing Commission's questions. There will be no
utilities except electricity which is already present in the garage.
The garage is not "legal" in the sense that it does not meet the
dimensional requirements for a two car garage, 20' x 20'. The present
garage is 18'-9" deep; a standard garage would be 20' deep. The
applicant proposes to add 7'-6" over the minimum legally required to
the rear of the garage. Thus it will be easier to park inside and also
provide for some storage area. The front of the garage is 90' from the
front property line and about 66' behind the front of the house.
Unless the house contains four bedrooms, on site parking requirements
are met with a one car garage 10' x 20' and one car parked in the
driveway where there is room behind the front setback.
(
� / �
In her letter the applicant states she has no plans at this time to add
on to the house. She notes that they plan adding on to the existing
drainage; gutters are on either side of the roof to downspouts at the
front of the garage structure.
Planninq Commission Action
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following
conditions should be considered:
1. that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's May 13, 1987
memo and City Engineer's June l, 1987 memo shall be met;
2. that the garage extension shall be built in conformance with the
plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped May 11,
1987; and
3. that the resulting 522.5 SF oversized garage shall not have any
utilities extended to it except electricity and shall never be used
for residential purposes.
I" f� �"�
Marg ret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
cc: Sandra Aguirre
PROJECT APPLICATION
�r CEQA ASSESSMENT
Application received ( 5/11/87
Staff review/acceptance ( (�2�$]
•c�� ��TM °� 1525 BERNAL AVENUE
BURLINGAME project address
� �'• '� °� Iproject name - if any
'�,,,.
)
i. APPLICANT Sandra Aguirre 348-8955
name telephone no.
1525 Bernal Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Same (work) 348-7474
contact person, if different telephone no.
N
a�
c
C Q •r
•r {.� r
r'�+-�'+
N � i
S. •r Q�
•r � Q
+� 6 O
� N S..
N i- �-
-� +� s.
a� o �c
+��a�
� �
U N
Q •r "�
r C
+� r�f
a� o
� r �
� v
}J � •r
U L N
� �
� �
+� � O
tn O S-
�
� o �c
O M U
cn N
N S. �
a� �o
U N �I--�
U L N
rO �n
�
�� a
�¢ +� �
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Special Perr�it ( X) Variance* () Condominium Permit () Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SPECIAL PERMIT for an existing 356.25 SF detached garage (18'-9" X
19') to be enlarged to 522.5 SF (27'-6" X 19'); a Special Permit
is required to exceed 500 SF. The applicants propose to add
166.25 SF (8.75' X 19') to the rear of the existing garage. The
pro,�ect meets all other code requirements reqardinq setbacks,
lot coverage, height and parking.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): (25.60.010-b ) (
4. PROPERTY IDEMTIFICATION
( 026-034-060 ) ( 7 ) ( 56 ) ( Easton Addition #5 )
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
( R-1 ) ( 6,000 )
zoning district land area, square feet
Sandra Aguirre � 1525 Bernal Avenue
land owner's name a re
�ur�ingame, CA 94010
Reauire�! Date received city zip code
(,g�� (no) ( - ) Proof of ownership
(,qa�s� (no) ( - � ) Owner's consent to application
5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
�19' X 18'-9" detached qaraqe in rear 30% of lot
Required Date received
(yes) �i) ( 5/11/87 ) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewall;s and
curbs; all structures and improvements;
paved on-site parkino; landscaping.
(yes) �rso) ( " ) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of usc�`on each floor plan.
(yes) �o) ( " ) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
(oiher) (n�) ( 5/ 11/87 j s; te 1 etter of nexpT anati on t� �
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PP,�IPOSAL (GARAGE EXTENSION ONLY)
Proposed construction, Qelow orade ( ' SF) Second floor ( - SF)
gross floor area First floor (1 6 6.2 5 SF) Third floor ( - Sr)
Project Code Froject Code
Pr000sal Requirem�nt Proposal Requirement
Front setback gl'± 15' min. Lot covera:,e �1% 40% max.
Side setback - - Ruild�n� height ].3�-].�'� 14� mdX.
Side yard * 1�/2g �± 0' P1 ate 1 i ne hei gh 7.66' 10' max.
Rear yarc; * 1'-3" 0 �n��site pk�.space� 2 2
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
Full tir�e employees on site
Part time employees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trip ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
EXISTING IPl 2 YEARS
after � after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
_�
��
�'�
�-_
�_
IN 5 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach se�arate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Residential uses on all adjacent lots. This use conforms
to the General Plan.
Required Date received
(y�5) (no) ( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties.
(,�) (no) ( _ ) Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( Sf other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. company vehicles at this location ( )
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 (X ) Other application type, fee $ ()
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 )
Variance/other districts $ 75 () Negative Declaration $ 25 ()
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ ()
TOTAL FEES $ 15� . �� RECEI PT N0. 16Z34 Recei ved by B. Wh i ttemore
I herehy certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and corre�t-to the best of knowledge and belief.
� � '� �.1;� Date � �� � �
Signature �i ���`�- �-
ppl i cant
STAFF USE UNLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
The City of Burlingame by on
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
19 ,
Categorica1ly exempt, Reference
Code Section 15301. Existinq Faci1ities
�r�►���-- � �
Signat re of Processino Official 'tle ate Si ed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the d�te posted, the deternination shall be final.
DECLARATION OF POSTING Date Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I ar� City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I posted a true copy of the above Neoa.ti�re Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to th�a Council Chambers.
Executed at Qurlingame, California on
Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P;o
19
JUDITH� MALFATTI, CITY CLERK, CITY f'� SURLINGAh1E
STAFF REVI EW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated reply received
City Engineer ( 5/12/87 ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (na)
Fire Marshal ( " ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( — ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
Concerns Mitigation Measures
Do the plans comply with all Request comments from the Fire
Fire and Building Code require- Marshal and Chief Building
ments? Inspector.
Has sufficient justification Review application and make
been presented to grant this determination.
request?
3. CEQA REQUIREMEPITS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA review? No - categorically exempt
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study completed
Decision to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
RFP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR accepted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
�
�
�
�
i
�
�
�
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4. APPLICATION STATUS Date first received (5�11/8� )
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to pp licant advising info. required ( )
Yes( X) date 6��/8� P.C. study (6./8/87 )
Is application ready for a public hearing? 'jyes) �(no) Recommended date ( )
Date staff report mailed t applicant (� l/�) Date Comnission hearing ( bJ ���)
Application approved (� Denied ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) no) �
Date Council hearing ( ) Application aporoved ( ) Denied ( )
'� V �
signed date
0
Dear Sirs,
i����e���
MAY 1119� 1
ca i v o� au�ura�t���
Q� •�inir. n=��
?525 �ernal Avenue,
Bur:lingame .
10th i�iay 1987
I��,ruuld like t� enlarge the existing 19' x 18' 9" gaz•age in oz•dor to
provide more vehicle s�ace and more sturage space. The stur�age space is
necessary ot•-ing to the luw square-footage of the house (1350 sq, f't. ) and
the lack of cupbuards and closets.
In this process, ��re Urould be pruviding a legal garage as ��ell as up-
dating the rear and side of iL to curront code standards.
A.s vie���ed frc�m the frunt, ther�e T.�ould be nu visible changes, as V-e are
only extending from the rc�ar of' the gar•age in uz�der to pr•eserve the existing
�A+�chP�� `�n T� !����
brick f.rontage �.;hich matches the house -- see photos a, b, c.%I'There is nu
c1osF: neighbour to the rFar as ther•e is a lU' city easement.
I r�espectfully ask that yau do nut requiz•e a site survF.�,y( due t� cost
of same ), as „e are f ul'lo�-ing the existi.�� side ��:a11 and f �unuation uf the
garage t• hich is already 1' f'rom proper•ty line. The �ro��sed ne�� rear s-:all
and foundatiun ��ill be 1'3" from the proper•ty line. rhF;re are existing fences
on al'1 pruperty lin�:s, and the rear �ruperty line lies in a straight line �.�ith
all the uthers along the easem�nt. On eithez� side of' mF� thEr.•e are structures
built on the actual pr�par•ty lir,as, and I intend to sia,y 1`3�' t��ithin the rear
and 1' from side side on the existing foundation.
Thanking you for� your considez•ation,
Sin cerely,
���v��� ��; �l:l.l,h,�� .(�
Sandra Aguirre ��
..
,i ,
;
DATE : �.2 /9
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER _
CHIEF BUILDING SPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR Of PARKS
FROM: PCANNING DEP�ARTMENT
�.
SUBJECT: (�PGf�C /�+t �' ��5�/% ��6��5 Sl� ' �
C�`a c,�j�' C�i �' �� '� � �cc�I E� � �2Z- 5 S�
� /s �S /j ��0 a %�P�rv�'>
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
, Planning Commission. The application will.be scheduled for ��� (.�L
at their
((%� �%� meeting. We would appreciate having.
' your comnents by 26 � ��
I ,
! � �� RECEIVED
, .
� Thank yo� . M1�Y 2 819$ l
I CITY OF BURLINGAME
p� ;'�INf; f1cPT
Helen Towber r•�. ��� ��c ��"sL:���oa��5 c;C:c_c��L�u��v�S
Planner
:Z 6 +�1 r�� S 7
5/
att:
�
�
DATE : �.2 /� �
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAI
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT.
CC
����� � ��i /��/l�% �� �..-�T7 /I (
�
Y�� �� ��— � �r�/�
a.v /S � �S ,����z� ������.:
An application has been received for the abovQ project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will.be scheduled for ���7j,�C=
,
at tlieir r�JhQ /%� meeting. We would appreciate having.
your corrments by /�%- 26 � %�
Thank you.
Helen Tawber
Planner
s/
att.
REC�I�IED
,��f�a 2 —1987
CITp OF BNRLI�N pTMG
�
� ; ������'�'% ,/,�,�
/
�
�2� _�c GG��y'c.����/
,
.
� ���„� ��� � � ���-� �-��
�;,-�� s�-�� �.,�W�� � � �,�'�'�` '
� �� ��� �� � �� � �
r
� . ��
�
� .�„�� .
��.SS'%��
—,
� �5�� .��. �.��
6 � �� �
DATE : �G'{�L �.2 /�
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
,,.,CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR Of PARKS
FROM: PCANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: �eG/� ���a�, f'
�'�r`aG(�/� C�/l �a���
cr-�' / �S 2,v �
� ��_
���
� �'%Y"S��J =
� �✓�/c�I y
��c��v� �
� �.S .S� .
—�,
,�� ,5z� S S�
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. The application will.be scheduled for .;���Z� C« '
at their � lj hP / CI�� meeting. We would appreciate having.
your corr�nents by ,,�f��� 2� � � %�f��`� � /�,_ p /�
-----, p
i �/J
Thank you. �Di ,�J d �H�NJ ,d� d.�%�r*.ew�
r �y//� � `
��O%✓I ` �u�/� " n % 0I�/cS/O b+
�/
�� � %i'+ � /+r ��~ _ -
C
Hel en Towber .�! /' ��� �� C
P l a n n e r � �� �/.s" ��S /� h�/`l'� f/�/I/ r� .C'o r.
/ �/f / _/j )���� � � .
S / �t / / j� / / /Z /V'G� D Cs9 / K��S ,r
a t t. /0 d L �/7� u v� �o H�S u � � a�. wi /°
.�
. �
� � � �
r �
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
FROM THE FLOOR
There were no public comments.
ITEMS FOR STUDY
11. SPECIAL PERMIT - TO ENL�RGE AN EXISTING GAR�GE -
1525 BERNAL �VENUE
Page 11
June 8, 1987
Requests: will garage have utilities other than electricity; is this a
legal garage, will it increase the parking in the garage; does
applicant have any plans at this time to add on to the house; clarify
drainage. Item set for public hearing June 22, 1987.
12. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT - 1730 ROLLINS RO�D
CP noted FM's notations regarding items previously required which are
not completed and which he felt must be completed prior to undertaking
the work for this special permit amendment. CP suggested the item not
be set for public hearing until these matters are taken care of. FM
detailed his requests. CA advised that Commission set hearing and
review items not completed as conditions of special permit amendment
action.
The item was set for public hearing June 22, 1987 if revised clarifying
plans are received by the Planning Department by 5:00 P.M. Thursday,
June 11, 1987.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- May 1987 letter to Al1 Broadway, Burlingame Business Owners,
from Charles W. Rothenbuecher, Broadway Stationers for The
Broadway Merchants Association, re: parking problem
PL�NNER REPORT
- CP Monroe reviewed Council actions at its June 1, 1987 regular
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Harry S. Graham
Secretary
REGEIVED
JUN .l 01987
CITY OF BURLINGAME
p' �in�r, ncor
uur'l�.n�a.m�: Flanning Commissi.on.
152.5 Bernal A.ve.,
:�ur�lingame� �4�010
,? �zne 9 c h 19c j
I would litce to address the questions that aruse at the study on
June 8th 1987.
l. There is only electricity in the e:xistinc„ garage and no se�� er or
�� ater is planned f ur the �r��pase;d en`largement.
2. There is no �artition �f any kind in the proposod plans.
3. N� addition to the house is planned.
4. ;J�y s+.,atPment that I?•-i11 be providing a legal gar•age s.hould
read - legal ��hb-ca.r C7arage. I am nat planning to add the one
�xtra fo�t in T� idth that �-ould make it a t�� o-car garage because
of the exis�ing brick fz•untage (see phatos) and the cost of
rebuildin�; this if° it •-as �-idened.
5. Existing draina�e �-uuld be continued (existing gutters extended
tu t� o ciY•ain pipes, onF a-t eithez• sidE �f the f ront of' the garage ).
�_ ��
�
Sandra A;uirre
��� � � �
, �,
/ { �� ''a � ,s �-�„ � �/
,.ryg��,r� . �. v� �.,� � � � � � ! . �. .. f � 1 . _ J`��: ' ' ` ` �
.3
a
.
.
� „, `ti� �,,�"',�y � +�' �:,:
. �"
,�� s� �" � ` b `" '
� _ � • -k�.. �' �• n .,, , . w��. .�,q= ,.: ,�. �T '" � .� - h.�
� , ``�� , � � �.
.�
`' + .[, � �
. � �� . � .�
; , -
��� & . �;., �wk"ti,t�" ;; '� -�,, � � .. �V. 1 , � 3�
� F , � ..��� • � !. �� ;��,
� ` �' . �j� �' .. ��'�ip; �, t�i' �� � r - e��P
,' �*, � � 1�. �'j `� . �• .
.f�` _�,, � �; � . � ";� -�,�
�` ,� � ,r.,� �:. �,tip . �.�,� �
ti„ � x ��� �; ;.�-, � ��� , � '��y,y¢
� � F4� f` �, + � . � ji '� "`t �1 . �
' ;,,�� t� �� �y . / �C .4. ��r ��' t
)� �i a� � ~ Y. �f� ` � ��y.. �'
Y � t ; Y
�' � � �s � J A�� �"' ,'�/' S .�� �," ' L ;�.v �� ��,,
� � ' �— �T ` "�. #.'' . ` ',�:= � JC/ � ` � \. ;." �,;� , , � f��_ ' �� �`� � �i *�
� �, a
; , �; s ' ,�. � Gi� �� �; . . �. � ` �,�.. � -�?y ''�
,�� : n �
_ „� � s�
�,�� — � � _
_ - � �:..�, �� - �
� � � � ��� � r ` €��
���� �
�. tr �
:
_ .. . ��, �:� _
^ �. rk. � t � fl �* { �`� ��
.`
�+y C . .si � � � �- � �
{ — _ :� �. �� ,'�� F �' €� ;�� 34 .�
� .
_ �
. � , ,� . ,
.,� c • � < ���
a
, =;�- �� t ,� ,- . f �.. � � ���-,
. � -. �
f � � . � . �y �q� « ' �.. } � ... � � �: r �'ti .
- .
, 4^ t
r..
_C — , y
#� ° ��4, ` �`� � � � � � A �
� � 3�� .,az, � '(� � %;
��,:--s. � � �� � ` � ?��.
, � , �
,
.
� ' „`� .. .. " .: � , . ` . � �'.
. �.. � �
�� � � � � � �� � �� � � _
. ,
' �: �,� ,
� ' �. �Q � � � ..
.
. ;�
�� , � ., r . �
, �
� �
;� < � ` �� �` ` � ��
fH .
�
- � � � �.
� �
, �
� _ � �� , Q , .
..
m � �,�, � � �'�� ,�
, �,;� � , � d �� � / � ���� - � � ti , ��
. � •° " _ sy, �' �,� `;�`` �; � � �V � � , ` �
` ; e J '
� � � �f � ' � �;� ! � � � �,S'�' tt,y. , ,
���:�_ �'�- ,�*' ij , ' t �,4t4$ ��+,f� . ��'� � �'�p�. � k� � �.. ,!F'��..
�:,' � ' _ �. �` , ,, �� �� . � �,�- � �" � �:
'�!�� .y _ �'y' , � . � � �� � � � ".,
_ `"'��� � �- �vY`�. . ,�:e , �`t, . �s ��Y f ��. 6�� � ,:` �,. � � �.:
�. :�� ,* �,3; *
x�� � � a��� F � �„ � , ��� � ��
;' �' ° �.� �� k :
. ,� �
ry4
I � , � � , '� '�f
� ds* ^ ` Y
� N � � . �►.i�' � `:e �� �(� .�b� 4, , � „4
�� �3 ;� , �s 4 /' � �.. a�� . ��°';,, � �* � � S , �I �,
� � ±� `�=�t �. . � �. ��� '� . t �
.
� .
� .'i�',._ / � � �� `c�. �r, +��� �' �`- a, -�'
"'�ut; ti..._, 1t�•_ � '�„ � .� �; :.� ,�, � ..i ���
> w , � *� :
_
✓ , - , �f ,- ,. .
.� .}.� �" _ „� �"b'% 4'k, e� .. �� C,� � r iy .. . , . �,.. �/ �,
�,. ���� . . ��'"� �. � �{�,. ^" � ,�f � t''`s".,
�� 1 � � �+,_ �r� ' ,.�� � �N °�a
� � � �
i
_ � � �v � ��� � , �.
, - � � -
,
� _ � . ,� ' , r,, r � ��, �
f - �/ " � 4 �:4,. � t � � v;li���', . .
.'
,
� "'� � � V y' , '°ql . ��� ',�� , . .
T,� ` �`fi �. � h,� ` 1�. � y �.
� �' �
�� y�
<. � _ ; .
„ � . .w �: .�. i a ,
:.�Y-'�� J �1� t�� ���'P.�^". � n':' � � � \ ...
�d t s� ;:�c� „h �.
.'..r '
�L � . �� — � , � y .. �� . � *# ��
�
!
! . �� � Ars°` �-a � = �:i:
� � � � k f�: � ��'� ,$�
�,� � t,� � : � � �,� �.
� �=� �� �` �'' `�N � " � �
�� '�+� _ � ���€` 4 � ;,�� �JN - ' � � � .�
.— ' �� -�. ;� � .
� � � �'� , "� � � � �� �
�-7i('�1 � �` — s �t�� ^ � �` ' =: -�", � �` �jy. � � � �
TQ ��� � � �:'t � �.,.�I�k ,.,� J� .
' �� � r � �:�. . 'rz ")��:.
� � y ��� +
� - �," �` . .r . � . 1
i L.
� :
� r
�'�m�Y� �' � . . � — � �, : r#�' �'".._ � ¢' _A � -� -� � P,
, �" ' � '�- d � ,��
+ � �, f� ,.� � �.
'� ;� � � ��- '_'�`�,, � ��.._ �'�. _ � � �
. � � *: ��" � , a',� —
r,
� � � �_ � � �, � � .
�' .� x� � �ja�Q ' �.. " �'� <� �"'�' ���' ,R "
� � � � ' � � ,� g' -<. '��� � .
� � �" � .
.: �
,.,
.
. �,. �. �. n.` _ _ . . �
�_
�� ��. . r� � �
'� • : � .� !` � .
.�� �`� ' ' `��' , ,,��� � �_ � i ' � �'�__ ` _ �.
���� t ��� _ _ —�
.-.a � f ` �; ��:.
9 . _ � �'�' , �, �°� .� _� _ , L. .. :�..:v _ . , .
\� ��q
oAATtD JVN[�
�hr C�it� nf �u�lirt��tmQ
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL: (415) 342-8931
NOTICE OF HEARING
Special Permit
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 22nd day of ,7une, 1987 , at
the hour of 7: 30 P.M. , i n the Ci ty Hal l Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct
a public hearing on the application to add 166.25 SF (8.75'xl9') to the rear of
the existing detached garage, enlarging it to a total of 522.5 SF (27'-6"x
19'), where a Special Permit is required to exceed 500 SF, at 1525 Bernal
Avenue, zoned R-l.
At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard.
For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLAN�IER
�
June 12, 1987
�
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERMITS
RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame
that:
WHEREAS, application has been made for a special permit I
to enlar e an existin �
g g garage to 522.5 SF !
_____ ,
�
at 1525 Bernal Avenue �
_ (APN 026-034-060 �, ;
and I
WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said
application on June 22 , 198 �
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this
Planning Commission that said special permit is a�proved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution
be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
NANNETTE M. GIOMI
CHAIRMAN
I, HARRY S. GRAHAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission
of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the ZZIICI day of June , 198 � , by
the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
HARRY 5. GRAHAM
SECRETARY