The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1505 Bernal Avenue - Technical StudyAlternative Sites Analysis SFOK2 015 AT&T Mobility Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Facility Public Right-of-Way Near 1505 Bernal Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 �� -1��I 3 l 2.070 t�ITI' GF ��_is�LINGAME "';,n-�'! -°;;�!NIN� DIV. AT&T Site ID: SFOK2_015 I .'�� Summary New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility (AT&T) is committed to providing wireless telecommunications services and faste, data rates throughout the City of Burlingame, and is doing so by installing the least intrusive technology, with the least intrusive design, and at the least intrusive locations in the area. Rather than construct several additional macro facilities throughout the neighborhoods of Burlingame, AT&T is choosing to deploy very small facilities, called "small cells," that can be attached to utility infrastructure in the public rights-of-way. A small cell is a low-powered cell site, which, when grouped with other small cells, can relieve capacity constraints by offloading network traffic carried by the nearby macro antenna sectors, thereby improving signal quality and mobile data speeds. Objective Small Cell Node SFOK2_015 will help close AT&T's significant service coverage gap in this portion of the City by the least intrusive means. The node will enable very high data speeds, and ultimately 5G services, to these nearby users and improve service throughout the sector. Placing small cells on utility infrastructure in the public rights-of-way helps meet this need with minimal visual impact. AT&T conducted a thorough and good-faith analysis of potential sites in the area for the placement of a small cell facility. Working with the City Code and guidelines set forth by the Burlingame Planning Department, we investigated several alternative sites and identified the proposed site as the best available and least intrusive means to address AT&T's service objectives. The proposed site will provide substantial improvement in service to business, residents, pedestrians, and travelers in the area that will allow them to fully experience the advantages of AT&T's high speed 4G LTE service. And with AT&T's selection by the federal First Responder Network Authority, FirstNet, as the wireless services provider to build and manage the first-ever nationwide public safety wireless network, each of its new and modified sites will enhance its capability to improve first responder communications. Methodology and Zoning Criteria The location of a wireless communications facility to provide or improve wireless services is dependent upon topography, building clutter, vegetation, zoning, utilities, access, feasibility and availability. Wireless communication is line-of-sight technology that requires wireless communications facilities to be in relatively close proximity to the wireless handsets to be served. AT&T seeks to close its significant gap in service coverage using the least intrusive means under the community values expressed in the Burlingame Municipal Code. In particular, Section 25.77.080(c)(3) provides location preferences for siting wireless communications facilities. The proposed facilities in a residential zoning district, which is a third-level preference. The primary preference, which consists of sites farther away from residential districts, is not feasible because AT&T needs to place its small cell facility in the right-of-way of this residential area in order to meet the service objectives. The proposed design for his small cell matches the design that AT&T developed in working closely with the City Staff and Planning Commission, and which the City Council approved in two residential ROW locations in 2019. Under Section 25.77.80(c)(2)(A), AT8�T investigated but found no viable non-residential uses and open space sites. AT&T did not identify an opportunity to place new light poles under Section 25.77.80(c)(2)O. Placing a new light pole would be more intrusive to neighborhood aesthetics because it would occupy space in the public-right-of-way. The proposed site will not create a footprint in the right-of-way. All proposed equipment would be pole mounted, and all cabling and equipment will be tidy and painted to match the pole. AT&T identified the existing utility pole as the next available and feasible preference under Section 25.77.80(c)(2)(D). To meet Section 25.77.80(c)(2)(D), AT&T proposes to screen the equipment and paint to match the existing structure. In addition, Section 25.77.090 provides design criteria for wireless communications facilities. Consistent with Section 25.77.090, AT&T has sited and designed the proposed small cell to minimize visual and auditory impacts and to preserve overall aesthetics of the neighborhood. Based on these parameters, AT&T investigated site locations that could meet the service objective. AT&T's analysis is set forth below. Analysis AT&T investigated potential alternative sites for Wireless Cell Facilities (WCFs) to fill the identified significant gap. As stated above, no feasible collocation opportunities were identified in the search area. The following map shows the alternative sites in the City, which are discussed below. Location of Candidate Sites: � �� a� �•` �� Candidate #1 — Primary Candidate — Public right-of-way near 1505 Bernal Avenue Conclusion: eest available candidate. This PG&E pole is located in the public right-of-way near 1505 Bernal Avenue (IaUlong 37.585856, -122.378369). Consistent with Section 25.77.090(c) of the Burlingame Municipal Code, AT&T has sited and designed this proposed small cell to minimize visual and auditory impacts and to preserve overall aesthetics of the neighborhood. This pole is located in between two residences, and the top-mounted antenna will be sheathed in a radome painted to match the pole. Using pole-top antennas also helps the overall aesthetic by maintaining the existing pole line. The pole-mounted equipment will be in an enclosed box painted to match the pole. This site is feasible from radio frequency and construction perspectives. The pole-top extension, antenna design, and equipment box design were developed in working closely with the City Staff and Planning Commission, and the City Council approved the same design in two residential ROW locations last year. Use of this pole has been approved by PG&E. Candidate #2 — In the public right-of-way near 1500 Bernal Ave. Conclusion: not feasible. This utility pole located at IaUlong (37.58578, -122.377892) in front of 1500 Bernal Avenue. This pole is not California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) General Order (GO) 95 compliant because it has cut outs connecting it to primary power, and is also a high voltage pole. The pole also does not have enough space on it for equipment and climbing space. CPUC G095 standards require two of four quadrants of a wood pole to be free for climbing and equipment space, this pole would not meet this requirement. Therefore, the pole is not viable. Candidate #3 —in the public right-of-way in front of 1500 Vancouver Ave. Conclusion: Not feasible. The pole is located in the public right-of-way in front of 1500 Vancouver Avenue lat/long (37.585055, -122.378515). This site is not viable because adding a small cell here would not leave sufficient climbing and equipment space. CPUC G095 standards require two of four quadrants of a wood pole to be free for climbing and equipment space, this pole would not meet this requirement. In addition the pole has cut outs connecting it to primary power. For these reason the pole is not a viable choice. � v. q t v r... � QvJ �-.��,YJ'� �'f�l. ' .� '� , yvn !�� l�{�j.i j! � ; .1 �� i i � _ � t a y � J � . 17 . . � R'�/ ) . � . " � Y i. ' i.�; : p 1 ��7i��/�� w�I� ..: � � �I�r * Y� ; V � � 1 � � f �i� 1 C 4'1 !I. �' y Y � F . � � k+ � i,�,At � '� y��,y�¢.A � .� i4 - KA�, ti..� 11� � �Sy�,� �p + r� .7 � '' '� � � - �.7 .�4t�Y . ! '.� ��' i.�.•� �F� �� 3 �R � S a �: }� �Y � �' r•. C �!► ' ` ; t.,� �''' V,.• � .'� ry i- i� +�,.^t�, ` �.^ ' 1�a' ' ! � - �ts �y� � � s� �� ty+yy,, .5�i� �� x ��.* � t�,ti � �= �j Fb��t�� .,?� .yr �.9'. 4 .'-�y'eNy...��s �� ✓w�r I} y`a �i.« � h �y f .� r �L � .ti ? rI .�1'A'� { 9(�� _ � - �/��5�� f/ 11.1�� t .�c5 `� f � :� � ��' I � '�` � . ��t�F �{'.� �'� ;� . �"' � Y� � i±x: �� `�' ,.� �� -�� `t.� 7R�' ' T;. . �r� ��- �. .. �� t � �* � . � � "� w'��y - ,' � t � � s f�,_�,�- � S'" , . . ' �:, �.�� e r � . 1 �. r� 5- �t _� � y a ' '�. ��/ ��%r'At "'^*G _ � n►.F .'�jd r.. � • y � � � � w4+j,.,�� ,f�� Yy '- � �. '� � . c�1 _7 �f�� '� r �� ' r��K.� �� ... . � W' y�'�: .�� . �;. �"a� . 3✓ � � ,� T l � r � i . . N. 2`.' � !f. � ^ � - � � q . � /� , • + NA . L� � Y` +. � y! .! ` � " A 4"� r .r " �� J,,��.��}Pr.. ,6 ,, so- � L�.' ` . , �-� ;� ;�._t ,; , ,;� � ' �� 7 .:. �� .. ._ , , , �.._ ,� �' 2�,��`' �y � �� r,�- , , � � , -� r,:, r �t ,� � . �� ``�� '�� ,y �•' r Y�` �+i,�,�,4'�!•1�� . _ � :�r ,. ..�r � 4�J � , . q � � ;'L`�0.. � r fi��,�, ' �# ' "r��: �c;, a t tin� `' ' r. '�^ !, � *e b . C' ` . � �2 +` N. f : � �„ • ,$ a �•• . r. •�'. F p � � ,� x#r,�r � � �.i 7� � i, i. p ,' ,� � • ,�..ak, �w`i�� 'ah . l�� _ }. • , ,�-� 4 ' �;�, � -F�o� r�t'+ �;�` �,'v ,. .x i�,r �x 6 \ ..�� 'Y�Ly"� . ' � r`'Y' - �` ---� �'7y�� ; •, � � ";. R !��>;s1 �-��ii4��` � �. � ,: . �'� ?. . i �, .. . t.i � � �, . . .. {� �y , � i 1 �e.��Y` x�'� . � nr y� ��- , � , k y�yu .�� FI � . �.t � , .. � . .e� ..�. '�y! `.� ., _ � �� F �� f i P p 1+ �9T��?' �. t. ' . w ►'� . � � s � � = `'�,'�� .'��:: Candidate #5 — Public right-of-way in front of 1525 Bernal Ave _ ;��._.s:� Conclusion: more intrusive than proposed site �; ��d�, r�: �.` This pole is located in front of 1525 Bernal Avenue Lat/long (37.586128, -122.378865). This pole is more intrusive then the primary candidate, as the pole is located directly in front of a residence. Candidate #6 — Public right-of-way in front of 1501 Drake Ave �� ,.. � i' �'r � d. � � � �:: ;r"' 'f � � %� / �: !, � : �� ' ,< «�• _ :i�'�` "�_ ` 1 � :_, .. � -- �. .��1 �`� � . - � —�_ �` . fi � - . . � ,� � � �� K �� _ � `�j �` � - � ;n�� - F �p _ � v� �yp�. p� ! ` � * s� �� -... �} rZ` . . , A . Av1 fii!$Y'�.y a'.'a.� � �•..'t �'c�-n S.�iH ��tE ± Conclusion: Not feasible. This pole is located at lat/long (37.586421, -122.377282) on Drake Avenue. The pole is a drop pole, with a lower height than the other utility poles in the area. The pole is more intrusive than the subject pole because the pole would have to be replaced with a substancial larger pole, to accommodate AT&T network's needs. Candidate #7 - Public right-of-way in front of 1401 Drake Ave 4�� ..mw��2,�..�. ,.� .� ,.... r � � � � �, ,-:--''�./-' � �� .. /...— ; � � _ �- -� �� ,e,��. . ,� �.�. — �_� ��'" ., ...� � / , �; 4, � .,.---� i'� ...�. _ . , . : , r � � ,.�: ::�, Conclusion: Not feasible. � , � ._ ~; �. iii��,�� .._ . This pole is located at lat/long (37.584749, -122.374689) on Drake Avenue. The pole would not meet CPUC G095 requirements, as there are 3 transformers, a disconnect switch, and cutouts connecting to primary power located on the pole. Candidate #8 — In the public right-of-way near 1900 Hillside drive Condusion: Not feasible. This utility pole is located at IaUlong (37.584393, -122.374792) on Hillside drive. Adding a small cell attachment to this pole would not be CPUC G095 compliant as the pole has cutouts connecting to primary power. Therefore, this is not a viable pole. Candidate #9 — in the public right-of-way in front of 1804 Hillside Drive �� Conclusion: Not feasible. , � . 1 � ,�.w�.�-____j_------ ��\\ -- _ - A�R'-,'"'. �+. �. \ .. � _�--�'��..^.�-_._.. . . .. _.�-.�.-.,� .�� Candidate #9 is located in the public right-of-way in front of 1804 Hillside Drive lat/ long (37.585083, -122.374196) This location is not compliant with CUPC G095 standards because it has a cutout connecting to primary power. Therefore, the site is not feasible. '�,�`4, � • ,;rtl�`l �:t''"'�y.� �":T+'.# r i� ti�v �• f l, � ,. a, d 3 �'t'.� a y�,,,�, , #s� ,Y''Y )' � y � + � �'» � `. . � �� R ,,� ;i � `� , �:� �R�4' ' `� � , Y ,� r � , '� -�.N. ; t .�,�' �. � '",�! ,�, q� `�r+-„�� t �d �,,: � f 7. �� v� ��Y� � �� , � '�� i R ��.sy .. �e _ � `?•Y� � i:- �� :'i� , ' il' i�' C� � « � :� �,. , r!,±,$�+. ,,,, � 51� �!! � r �. . � n ,� r . , '� _1,,, ,d • ,. . Y j : �' if` f jk,1}... � �� 5 ' � �p I . f �Xti .. � '" . t 7 � , � " Q � � �'ja� ��K tR�\� �.�� l Y ' �'« � � {� ,' �' . 'c a �s x � r�;' Iz : „L.,az ��,r. � �� . ., ,�t'r , • :�Y'�'' , ' . '� , r . �5 s�," ,� � � � -� w �, �, � w . J f . �,�° �9� ¢ i �� 4'PP�.'�'' .i ,� �t �' .�.�11° ��; s} t �S . � +a.W �t� �a�. � �i ��r'� � � ��fe�� , � �r 4�� 4�! �I . � � h ,y �.. + t�i"� r' L��[' /�S�., * �� ;;44�,,�� + . X K,4, ai . �"� � J +�y .� ��''Y '�� L-1�: , � ,4� r',��i 1r M1�:� �:� ' ` ..` �I .I,. , f � � � r.�r' ��.� 1�F ��~ �L / , 3 a��jr F�� 1 1 � , : ' � , t �`�r,'k1.. 1 � � �� + � +�, � �, � �� '`� .. � r _ , ,�Y y � � a ,, . -„ , , : ,;. .,i � � ', ., � ��r� �` �' A � � �. -. �Y�� f�� ; • � .�, „ , , r - �i �� 1�� a i4�•;3,..� •— , , a � ' �„�i ' s. �'f � � : N, , : � � ` . , a • %'��- ti.a� s .`�"` :;,�' � � ''"�R'�•, I._ t ' ' �� "�d ^r, - _ .� •a:'� `',�` �� ; �i 1 r9, � ' 'k31 '"' ..r �_'aS*',^1 � � -� , . �rr�.'t: �h. x' :'�� ; � �� ...�. -- -� _ . • . r a ��, .�J t�c.� J i# ' � , " f J'+ � r. ir � Mr �'� _ �i � � i +w*+ � ,e . : �, �► ' ,. „%�- `` �' ` �+' ' .. .. - _;s,,,,�� _ w — ` r,._ ... : . � S _ , r • +'�'-_'- _.�*- _ *j�/- � - -'� - • -,' ' r � - � . ,. ,� . _ _ „ � � �� I _-. �+� , .^ � — � � �� ' .�� ,, -,.. ., . �` � �, _.w. � �.�—�"� '_'-y3 � �� •'f •S �: Candidate #11 — Public right-of-way in front of 1504 Bernal Ave Conclusion: feasible This proposed pole is located in the public right-of-way near 1504 Bernal Avenue (lat/long 37.585925, -122.378279). Consistent with Section 25.77.090(c) of the Burlingame Municipal Code, AT&T has sited and designed this proposed small cell to minimize visual and auditory impacts. This proposed pole is located in between two residences. The proposed design is specially evaluated per the Burlingame Planning Commission's request for alternatives. It is feasible from a radio frequency perspective and utility perspective. However, the PG&E power pedestal is required because AT&T does not have a master attachment agreement with the city and therefore cannot directly tap into city power infrastructure. Candidate #12 — Public right-of-way in front of 1504 Bernal Ave Conclusion: feasible This proposed pole is located in the public right-of-way near 1504 Bernal Avenue (lat/long 37.585925, -122.378279). Consistent with Section 25.77.090(c) of the Burlingame Municipal Code, AT8�T has sited and designed this proposed small cell to minimize visual and auditory impacts. This proposed pole is located in between two residences. The proposed design is specially evaluated per the Burlingame Planning Commission's request for alternatives. It is feasible from a radio frequency perspective and utility perspective. However, the PG&E power pedestal is required because AT&T does not have a master attachment agreement with the city and therefore cannot directly tap into city power infrastructure. The proposed pole would include all remaining equipment in the base to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Conclusion The proposed facility, Candidate #1, is the best available and least intrusive means by which AT&T can close its significant service coverage gap in this portion of the city. Denial of the proposed facility would materially inhibit AT&T's ability to provide and improve wireless services in Burlingame.