HomeMy WebLinkAbout1444 Bernal Avenue - Staff ReportItem # 2b
Consent Calendar
PROJECT LOCATION
1444 Bernal Avenue
City of Burlingame Item # 2b
Design Review Consent Calendar
Address: 1444 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 9/13/04
Request: Design review for a first and second story addition.
Applicant and Architect: Andrew Young APN: 026-043-140
Property Owner: David Crosatto Lot Area: 6000 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class l(e)(2) - additions to
existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas
where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not
environmentally sensitive.
Summary: The existing single -story house, with a detached one -car garage, contains 2,132 SF (0.36
FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to remodel the existing first
floor with a 227 SF addition, add a 994 SF second floor and add 38 SF to the detached garage. With
the proposed addition, the floor area will increase from 2,132 SF (0.36 FAR) to 3,338 SF (0.56 FAR),
where 3,388 SF (0.56 FAR) is the maximum allowed. Approximately 117 SF of the proposed floor
area comes from the lower level area which has a ceiling height greater than 6-0". The proposed
laundry room area does not qualify as a basement because the finished floor is more than 2 feet above
grade. The proposed project is 50 SF less than the maximum allowed FAR.
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from three to four (study does not
qualify as a bedroom since more than 50% of the wall is open to the living room). One covered (10' x
20') and one uncovered (9' x 20') parking space is required for the proposed four -bedroom house. The
existing detached one -car garage (16-10" x 16-10" clear interior dimensions) will be extended an
additional 3'-6" feet to provide one (10' x 20') covered parking space. One uncovered 9' x 20' space is
provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The following
applications are required:
• Design review for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.57.010, 5).
Table 1 —1444 Bernal Avenue
Lot Area: 6,000 SF (50' x 120')
EXISTING
PROPOSED
ALLOWED/REQ'D
Setbacks:
i
Front (IS`flr):
22'-4"
22'-4" 11
21'-8" (block average)
(2"d flr):
......................................................_..............._................................._............................................................................................................................................................._._.._._._......._.__.............................,.............................................................................._........_.._..__................._............................__.
none
44'-9"
20'-0"
Side ( left):
5'-3"
5'-3"
4'-0"
(right): I
... ........................................................................................................_...........,......................................................................................................_............................................................................................................_........_.........................................._......_.................................._...._...._...._....._...._._..__......_._............
8'-10"
9'-6" (to bays)
4'-01v
Rear (Isr flr):
46'-0"
3l'-8" (to porch)
15'-0"
(2"d flr):
none
3 F-8" (to balcony)
20'-0"
Design Review 1444 Bernal Avenue
Table 1 —1444 Bernal Avenue (cont'd)
Lot Area: 6,000 SF (50' x 120')
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
Lot Coverage: 1,962 SF 2,276.4 SF 2,400 SF
32.7% 37.9% 40%
FAR: 2,132 SF !
3,338 SF
3,388 SF
0.36 FAR
.................................................................................. ............ .... ................................ ...... .................... ...... ..:..................................
0.56 FAR
.... ...................................................................................................................................................................................
0.56 FAR'
# of bedrooms: 3 i
4
---
Parking: ' 1 covered
1 covered
1 covered
(16-10" x 16-10") '
(1 F-10" x 20'-411)
(10' x 20')
1 uncovered
1 uncovered
1 uncovered
(9' x 20') i
(9' x 20')
j
(9' x 20')
Building Height: j 18'-6"
-10"
DHEnvelope: j complies complies
' (0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3388 SF (0.56 FAR)
Staff Comments: See attached.
cl 1
CS 25.28.075
� was prtfowe
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on August
23, 2004, the Commission asked if the chimney in the front could come down in height and if it could
be replaced with a gas fireplace. The Commission also stated that the front picture window on the right
hand side should be dressed up and that a street tree should be added as part of the project (August 23,
2004, P.C. Minutes). The Commission moved to place this item on the consent calendar after the
architect has responded to the comments.
The architect reviewed the comments with the property owners and incorporated the following
suggested changes proposed by the Planning Commission:
• The chimney on the right was reduced by 8'-4" in height and the chimney on the left was
reduced by T-10" in height. (Planning Staff would like to note that elevation on pg. A0.1 does
not reflect changes made to chimneys or window. Please refer to elevation on pg. A5.1 for
changes).
• The front picture window on the right was dressed up by changing it from a rectangular window
to a round -top window that is recessed and matches the round -top window on the second story.
• The applicant proposes to place two flowering pear street trees were placed in the planter strip
2
Design Review 1444 Bernal Avenue
in front of the sidewalk, per discussion with the City Arborist.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted
by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's August
23, 2004, design review study meeting, that the addition is compatible with the mass and bulk in the
neighborhood, and that the FAR is below the maximum allowable by 50 SF, the project is found to be
compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review guidelines.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be
considered:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped August 6, 2004, sheets A0.1, A0.3, A0.4, A1.0, A2.0, A2.1, A3.0, A3.1, A4.3 and A
5.5 and September 1, 2004, sheets A1.1, A4.1 and A5.1-A5.4; and that any changes to the
footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;
2. that two flowering pear trees shall be installed with approval of the City Arborist, by the Parks
Department at the property owners expense in the planter strip in front of the house;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed
professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as
window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed
professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building
Department;
3
Design Review 1444 Bernal Avenue
5. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;
8. that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, Fire Marshal's and
Recycling Specialist's May 24, 2004 memos shall be met;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California
Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Erica Strohmeier
Zoning Technician
c. Andrew Young, applicant and architect
E
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
August 23, 2004
C. Auran a motion to place this ile#An the consent calendar t a time when the suggest revisions
hav�b� made and plan checked. motion was seconde . Brownrigg.
air Osterling called for a e on the motion to pl is item on the consent c dar when plans have
been revised as direct e The motion passed a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. e absent). The P�ng
Commission's acti s advisory and not ap able. This item conclud t 9:20 p.m.
10. 116 BLOO IELD ROAD, ZO R-1 — APPLICATIONTA
Z
ND STORY ADDIT (BOB KOTMEL, AP CA
ESIGNER 64 TICED PROJECT P ER:briefly pWOnted the project des �iion.There were
DESIGN RE�OR A FIRST
AND PROP - OWNER; JESSE
of staff.
Chair Osterli pened the public c ent. Jesse Geurse plicant and designer, 405 , 'swater Ave,
spoke in fa of the second sto ition which meets eeds of his client's growi ily. There were
no othe omments from the or and the public co ent was closed.
issioners aske at the applicant ad s the following:
• What materi the proposed chi made of?
• The rand placement of the 0 ows along the right si , ' evation should be more or ed;
• There ould be an overh over the proposed fro ryway;
• A set of landscap ans should be provide the action meeting;
• e windows and ors should be true div' light;
The applican ould submit studies ternative heights for the entry tower, the plan should
reflect his ferred choice;
• The s' of the corbels shoul ' 'increased to help the de
CJI%wnrigg made a on to place this item o e consent calendar at a ti hen the suggested
visions have been e and plan checked. T motion was seconded by ran.
Chair Osterl' called for a vZmn
otion to place this item o consent calendar plans had
been rev' as directed. Tssed on a voice vot -1 (C. Keele ab The Planning
Com ' ion's action is advisppealable. This it concluded at 9:35
11. 1444 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION (ANDREW YOUNG, YOUNG AND BORLIK ARCHITECTS, INC.,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DAVID CROSATTO, PROPERTY OWNER) (73 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Don Crosatto, property owner, stated that he grew up in this
house and was given the house by his father, his father will live with his family in the remodeled house.
Andrew Young, applicant and architect, 261 Hamilton Ave., Palo Alto, CA, stated that a reduction was made
in the originally proposed FAR because of the inclusion of the basement area in the calculation. The side
was trimmed to avoid a variance for driveway width. He also stated that a neighborhood meeting was held,
9 neighbors attended to take a look at the project. Only one neighbor expressed any concern, it was with
Me
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
August 23, 2004
privacy. To address, offered to raise the sill height to 5' which is possible and still meet egress requirement.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioners asked that the applicant address:
• The chimney in the front should come down in height;
• The front picture window on the right hand side should be dressed up;
• A street tree should be added as part of the project;
• The second chimney should also be reduced in height, could it be a gas fireplace?
C. Bojues made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions
have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans have
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m.
12. 1101 BU AME AVENUE NED C-
C
CIAL AREA — APPZION
TING COMMERCIA
HANGE IN THE CLA ICASALMA, APPLICA ; STAN VPROPERTY O R) (28 NOT
C. Visti ecused hims
stedown from is
�?Huriii bri presented
No. The ere no fur ea
ecause he a financial
but stavA4 in the Chambe
ect descri
ns of staf
KUBA/ILY
INGAME AV UE
ERCEW TO REM LAN
CI MENDM FOR A
LISHATING A (RIYAD
SALMTE TNERSHIP,
N,NER:
to t associated wie proposed proje e
OF answer questi on the project.
f material samplesre requested?
C Osterling o , d the public co nt. Riyad Salmo. pplicant, 2504 EastoDrive, Burlingam and
WE Vistica, a Rect, 24 Arundel ad, noted that th , ur existing retail spa wh0-1 ich would be c bined
into one la space are now r ively small, th ' %floor plans are awk " d, the bXiscal
chaical
system e outdated, intent ' o enhance the bedding and the vitality at corner, point of
the c ercial area, are at the point of cJa6;sing specific materi type of tiles. oted that
t aterials should ade available s' " e this is a highly visib 'corner. Architect"y change
the exterior w be the tile col and window system,,., ings will be canand the color will be
chosen depen i g on the tenant. commission asked if nant has been ch en. Applicant noted t a
tenant has been chosen at s time, it is difficult .choose a tenant wit having an approved j ect,
howev talian, Medite ea and pizza estab ents have show interest, the anticipated ber of
em ees and custo s were derived from pling other food e , lishments in the area. ommission
asked for clan ica ' about how the pro ed operable windoyr will function? Archite " oted that t y
would most li slide open, since w [ ows cannot encroaph into the public right-o'
ay.
Contin discussion: the pro sed large food estahment may be a sul
this JoFation, concerned ab r , `impacts on parki n the area, asked if valet
project? CP Monroe p4d that it can be , Mired if shown that it is
restaurant would pr de valet parking if it ould help with parkin uld
can be
only decide
4ed
fuse at
with the
[oted that the
valet parking
11
Project Comments
Date: 05/18/2004
To: 0 City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1444 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026-043-140
Staff Review: 05/24/2004
,e
nn
'!A-��L
l �j�.�wrrr��i WL LJCy2l� �I'T14'ini C�.Et� ter' FZ�'`�cu
rj /J-O f %/
Lr'W
aV tYL, AW -Z",w r M
Reviewed by:
VU Date: /D
Project Comments
Date: 05/18/2004
To: ❑ City Engineer
Chief Building Official
❑ Fire Marshal
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1444 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026-043-140
Staff Review: 05/24/2004
Reviewed by: Date:
4 � 4211-14 /-
-
7�7
Project Comments
,F
Date: 05/18/2004
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1444 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026-043-140
Staff Review: 05/24/2004
Reviewed by: � Date:
Project Comments
Date: 05/18/2004
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
❑ Fire Marshal
'`Recycling Specialist
/❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a first and second story addition at
1444 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:026-043-140
Staff Review: 05/24/2004
G/7: AIL
G L'(�lJ 41�L
2 a�
Reviewed by: Da e:
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P (650) 558-7250 F (650) 696-3790
a� CITY
W1M1j iAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
W\0-
Type of application: Design Review < Conditional Use Permit Variance
Special Permit Other Parcel Number: OZ(a O¢9 14,0
Project address: �� p`L � � ���L,I t) coe�-`
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
# js.Nvacw
Name:`foJoJ(r bsjo 0-4L►r- arfcH ITt,,rr 0i(-• Name: CAL O SA'1-F0
Address: 2(0 ( IL,-mkJ Avt,70 Su i-rE 2f 8
City/State/Zip: AG-M1 CA 9¢3 a I
Phone (w): & 1�;0 ( 9, S - I `15 0
(h):
(t): 6so 3213 - I I I I-
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
-K Atitp Ze w Yo vfJcz
Address: 1444 13e" (, AVM ,
City/State/Zip: 00Z-1-1om ( NtE CA -I ` 010
Phone (w):
Name: -f000 z ANt7 t0 c-
(h): 6 q0 34 -7 - 2 855
(fl:
Address: 24o I ?.IS Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
City/State/Zip: �,6.L-o A��@,�� 3o I Phone (w): (P'5 0 (aa `i 50 RECEIVED
(h): MAY 1.7 2004
0 3Z3-((IZ CIPLANNIING DEPTME
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: I~IfeS-FAWV SZ�-cowp S-MTZ-( Ar->P11.o1J Tb
SIIu6l.4-:; STar-Y He Fio , Pa-o" 3 "T-b 4 t3Enrz-o6t-1s -to-t-AL,
SQ FT,
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby cFertVy under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and corre t to the be o y knowledge and belief. /
Applicant's signature: Date: S` 17 0-f
I know about the proposed app .catio nd hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's signature: Date: G
PCAPP.FRM
<629 CITY OF BURLINGAME
8""1- F. E PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
...,, ,. TEL: (650) 558-7250
Site:1444 BERNAL AVENUE
Application for design review for a first and
second story addition at: 1444 BERNAL
AVENUE, zoned R-1. (APN: 026-043-140).
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Monday, September 13, 2004 at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Hall Council Chambers located at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed: September 3, 2004
(Please refer to other side)
A copy of the a
to the meeting
Burlingame, C
If you chal
ge
raising onl
osl
described i
t
at or prior t
Property o
ers
tenants ab
t thi
558-7250.
an
Margaret
r�
off+
City Planner
PUkJr
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
alai P�
D -en't ay be reviewed prior
1� o 1 Primrose Road,
CE
be limited to
blic hearing,
d to the city
hung their
call (650)
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
design review for a first and second story addition at 144 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1, David
Crosatto, property owner, APN: 026-043-140;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 13, 2004, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class
1(e)(2) - additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are
available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is
hereby approved.
2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such design review is as set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 13th day of September, 2004 by the following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for design review.
1444 Bernal Avenue
Effective September 23, 2004
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped August 6, 2004, sheets A0.1, A0.3, A0.4, A1.0, A2.0, A2.1, A3.0, A3.1,
A4.3 and A 5.5 and September 1, 2004, sheets A1.1, A4.1 and A5.1-A5.4; and that any
changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this
permit;
2. that two flowering pear trees shall be installed with approval of the City Arborist, by the
Parks Department at the property owners expense in the planter strip in front of the
house;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features
or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall
provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department;
that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project
has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that
these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a
Building permit is issued;
7. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department;
that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, Fire Marshal's and
Recycling Specialist's May 24, 2004 memos shall be met;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for design review.
1444 Bernal Avenue
Effective September 23, 2004
Page 2
10. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm
Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and
California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
n r11� r b�
Qi
k
ilk
'o..' "�E'�• `9�{''SC,. ',� ..� '' � ;z.� ' ���
TA 011
Y
oil
e
,fin Pr7 4`:'
3 � i� "• �% � Ate, .. O"
sw vP
r A,a , i•,�a. ,r .''
d RM
,.
Or J
:Ann pp
s
j5 • ; �� .� s', 4
* ✓.. / } ,�
-4td(Py�,
f
a
r
•
J
c ! _
K r
A
TOWN,
c
IM
44,
AiA
J
r�
�s
t-
s d
^ � Slry '� � J � ,.. J
�, � a.
f n rz
,
� A�Or�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TEL. (650) 558-7250
FAX. (650) 696-3790
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: FROM:
Andrew Young Ruben Hurin, Planner
COMPANY: DATE:
May 28, 2004
FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES:
(650) 323-1112 9, including the cover sheet
RE:
1444 Bernal Avenue, Burlingame
❑ URGENT 2 FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE
Andrew,
Attached please find my plan check comments for the project at 1444 Bernal Avenue, Burlingame.
Because additional information and clarification is required, this project is incomplete at this time. In the
comments, you will find requests for additional information and clarification on the plans (asterisked
items). Once these items have been addressed on the plans, please submit one set of plans for our
review.
In the comments you will note the following exceptions may be required, depending on the revisions
made. The required forms can be found at www.burlingame.org.
• Variance for driveway width (form and $850 filing fee required);
• Parking variance (based on the number of potential bedrooms) (form required);
• Conditional use permit for accessory structure height (form and $850 filing fee required).
Also attached are comments from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and Recycling
Specialist. These comments can be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Please call them
directly if you have any questions regarding their comments.
If you should have any questions regarding the plan check comments, please feel free to call me at
(650) 558-7256.
Sincerely,
Ruben Hurin
Planner
501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME CA • 94010
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
(650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax)
Plan Review Comments
Job Address: 1444 Bernal Avenue {FYOPoScj Sccyc cl F wov k V A I; 4 e5
a- oSe
Date of Plans: May 17, 2004 '�2`"' I^�d
r vv �e�-DIY wok
Job Description: First and Second Story Addition Page: Lo+ Ae-e4, GovOt:4 2c�
(SP' i'l Yr �1a+�'vn$•
�X 5�rq ProPoseJ AI1vwtdf 12c'q'c�
I S e4 toe, t- k 5
Fj-"+ Si'1 22.1- 4" 411 � 15' or a�q , ✓
(Z-a)
none.
4-41 -1q
I
1
20
c;
5'-3,"
5i-31'
+1
(Z.. di
r, oYI e
31'- & „ At,
2-0'
# Tiroviofe. avercige , 4k;5 &,4e o� -i-i,e- 1610c �-, ✓
2_ Lo+ (01)eYAq¢ (40,/, x (a000"-* = 2,400 ,,, Pa , ao"o ,.1)
y 1- rv� o S -e
2"�18' 2"% arAgc)-
d 8.3 (�A ragL i
4-7 6A11451 l° YPQVI
I3-7•? �lo'-�"X 13'-4Z,3531,IP�o>
-1 S (I'-(� 5') (bays
�Icv2 3z,-7
• Cow I"'eS w "`� � I�-I- GovGraC �
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
(650) 558-7250/ fax: (650) 696-3790
Job Address: � `- 4 � S e v-Aod Ave Page: Z
3• Floo✓
��a- (Za+�o
�0,3ZX C000Oi I Ilbo+ 3to&`' = 2 3 8S'' IIla
%oS,�
✓,OI.�SL
330
(garaye)
— Ica (421f�v^�p�an,
+ Z-1-7
v
/13-� � ZD�-�O>
l
��owof �loorl I g5 � �1out�/ ��00✓1
Zz3 ,0
- IC,d (lows.
��o�-
�X�+� -�) ► 4 14
Z1�2`P
�0,3to FAX-)
�S,q
13 -7• 7
I+ ibA7�
To+a,3SS7 (0,S9 FAV-
Prol -floor ar«. exLu-Is 4k4 er,AA,—,,-,-, 1111011t.1 6/ P119 r# -
PI ea se n,,A 4-hA� }S
f-00m is ;ncl'jej +(oo✓ r QOndv ",I I
S (a'-o" prea4-cx. P)eA- ,fie. reduC.C.. -Aoo✓ o-reA-, 4v v Go
�j
or
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
(650) 558-7250/ fax: (650) 696-3790
Job Address: 1 +44 Serna.I A ue.
4, He;-� h4-
Page: 3
00.V�Y,o� Jerl +y CoA Par%ce, w 4k r,
cuv On < TYun IYvQQvri/
i V
Gorr-Q.�Y �vS-I- Le Pro v; cLcJ cL by � � � nS-ed 5vvy��,(yy
I `NU 1 t SlyVV{ evV la A,!� 'IYO1+^ �iVVV f OY 1 1 i "'{ 4wo
419 O C V I eU v IC-H
�rov e GvCvagt
7 O i- e" v i j 'e- I e oa-jl oil V1 v „"
i
e,Iej 4i'o 6t,+- on gvnA SIeJn+�uns
7� (Canrd-}yev,f-'I or\Lf- W. IJFi Rd; c�e'0avivrc-
�z7fdei-er",r,e e CkVtraQJ:&
-FrOr a ra r ea v car mc-.Y- e I e /�cc "or• S a-i �a
S o G e,J S a-{- t o u r Gc3 ✓ n Per S a t
�1114
S Y `o w F7 n I o t d2 Gt Y 4-v y �. ( 4r jCi I� a^ TZ� ✓ < Ge L ! L U� f G a�
C
(o, Fa r k
�4. !�ve Gi5 l` (2y4e-+)A� 6-eJvoJv.- w�
4 S %ovse \,o Five tL�, JrooMS. Fva 6t ci Yoo S tl2Giv1'VCS
4-wo cOvey cc� Pa r k;�g spaces .
�r\ orciey-4ogJGII
tti�
!�S
6cdroo",S ,
+kc
�e4wee.,
+ke_
S4-L,
and
1,,�,rg v�JS
`� I e •�
lr\
o 4. kc-
w a (,1
o r (>' - 8"
w 14 L
ki 0 doors,
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
(650) 558-7250/ fax: (650) 696-3790
Job Address: 1 4- 4 4- -Bc ✓ ^ r-( &,e • Page: 4
t. Pam 1,;-1 (wr4' 4�
�)ar�ancc_ rt t)IvCc1 -�j✓ cif VrVjA oSc�
InI�CYG �1-i0� I SG vv, niM�rr, 1�PG}J��Cc� (Gt S yvAAS�-.vej 1 0
the Ibc,� vj
?. LAV\dS(ap "
F,0v
-c) S
-eckS c;,f
a11 e
4vu5
kec
<5 lawn
I�r,v-eL-j
ia
/
on
Based
o� ic,� p�p0Sccj floc,
Lti✓Pti. 0.
4v4r, of
Ve V1ytc1
ICA 4S'(a
4YecS co,-1,4
-bwaY
ulvr-w—"
rc e-
h,e w
K eci .� 1✓ u e Gr S
vH v S-I - l� e
A+k,'s
Z 1 - i rc
b v.>( s I' Z e..
V
�. AS4,ry c4u rL ( 1)E'taea h cl &--YAgA) r
Mv� he I^1T a1�pow<d ai' rope t+Inc 5 Ip'- IO` "yo
GC+iAc�Q_nT QrAd¢ ` YDOOSCcl . 'e>L�S,on ISI`'-`" I,--,►lei'gk+,
J I a I �
P)?A-Se fC uc-C_. ke �h 4-o Io' -cv" or Apply 4,- '�