HomeMy WebLinkAboutDesign Review-L � � = �: � �
_ - L_
- - �
� - _ " ' j.v ' ':.r. _
_ ■ -
:are..� - - ,.:n:.:..:�.to.. tiar:� .�.rk� a.r.t•.,f..f:ts{.Wsiitld- -1.��:>:.c:[;=.'G^r..t
���, CITY O�
BURLJNOAME
���.,m
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Planning Deparunent
Ciry Hall - 501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, Califomia 94010-3997
Tel. (650) 558-7200
September 6, 2000
Mark Robertson
135 Arroyo Court #4
San Mateo, CA 94402
Dear� Mr. Robertson,
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the August 28, 2000 Planning
Commission approval of your design review application and special permit for height became effective
September 5, 2000. This application was to allow construction of a new two-story house with detached
garage at 1441 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1.
The August 28, 2000 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the
following conditions:
1. �hat the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped August 4, 2000, sheets 1 through 4, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area
of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding
or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the
plate height, roof height, or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 24, 2000 memo shall be met;
4. that the stairwell on the south elevation shall be redesigned so that it projects from the landing up
as a cantilevered bay and breaks up the long south side of the house; and
5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998
edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
.__,.,::.u.....,.t �,c�...�.....,.:a.w.��.......,.� ,...:�....�,,..�_ ._...,r�:: ..�� .._... . ....__. _ �._K_ ..a..__.....b...,..-_......�Nra..1�.,.+�U.�..._,..,x.e.,..:r.�.c�wti�:�:�:,���Jfm�ii�+":..�s- .r:;:c'�:`��,,�-��."
September 6, 2000
1441 Bernal Avenue
page -2-
Reimbursement of any unspent portion of your design review deposit has been processed and will be
mailed to the property owner under separate cover.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department.
This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension
of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end
of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a fmal administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within
90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law.
Sincerely yours,
C�c
Margar t Monro
City Pl er
MM:mrb
1441BERN.cca
Linda Frye, property owner
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(Lot 10, Block 45, EASTON ADD BURLINGAME NO 4, RSM A/45; APN 026-044-100)
, ` `+ ' T ���f�
�'}�� � l . �
•
n'P � ; d � •
�/�� �/ �� l.{i; :.1�'�
t ����. N
r
.- ..� �.,
'\ •�' �• - � � • r
w ��. ���•'591�
,q, �Ya �9
V• � 1_
Y,�
rx'• w
: V� ,I • ,
'�:.•�.•
�„R,Yt �_.'w.
��
I
� `
��i�.a�� ��
. .�
�.�A:4�' � � •' /
� ` � �� �
. .
_ .. . ,'.,> , „ �
,�(�{'���,���'t:�i ����ti�;;::.�- _
s k
��1-,_:�d4y Y.� 1
} _ri
J` F�,t r ,��y� .
e �
-=�--Y-- }w, � `i�
��� �t— * � � (�,�� ;t , �
�j� ar :MMv
i�'� .� i ,
4.: ..
:t,� � '
i ... -� �
.1 .
y
�. �+ � � i � �:� .' �
�y, S rilh��r�r� _�:�
I :.
���
: �
City of Burlingame
` Design Review and Special Permit for Height
for a New Two-story House with a Detached Garage
Item #
Action Calendar
Address: 1441 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 8/14/00
Request: Design review and special permit for height (32'-3" proposed; 30'-0" allowed) for a new two-story house
at 1441 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.040 & 25.28.035)
Property Owner: Linda Frye APN: 026-044-100
Applicant/Designer: Mark Robertson
Lot Area: 6000 SF
General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of
limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction
with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be
constructed or converted under this exemption.
Summary: The applicant is requesting design review and a special permit for height for a new two-story house with
detached garage at 1441 Berna1 Avenue, zoned R-1 (plans date stamped 8/4/00). The existing one-story house which
will be demolished contains 1568 SF of floor area (0.26 FAR), and has 3 bedrooms. The new 4-bedroom house will
have 3226 SF of floor area (0.54 FAR) including the new 315 SF one-car detached garage, where 3335 SF (0.56
FAR) is the maximum floor area ratio allowed. There is enough FAR remaining to expand the proposed garage
to a 427 SF two-car garage in the future if it is ever needed.
Staff Comments: Attached
PROPOSED
SETBACKS
Front: 1 st f Zr
2nd.flr
Side (left):
Side (right):
Rear: 1 st f Zr
2nd flr
LOT COVERAGE:
�27'-6"
"` 30'-0"
� , 8'_���
'
19�_6��
� 28'-0"
44'-0"
34.9%
(2094 SF)
FAR:
PARKING:
HEIGHT:
3226 SF/
0.54 FAR
:� 1 covered in garage
(14'-0" x 20'-0")
+ 1 unc. in driveway
32'-3"
EXISTING
32'-0"
N/A
9'-6"
4'-0"
30'-0"
N/A
26.5%
(1588 SF)
1568 SF/
0.26 FAR
1 covered in garage
(13'-6 x 15'-6")
+ 1 unc. in driveway
N/A
ALLOWED/REQ'D
block average = 19'-10"
20'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
15'-0"
20'-0"
40%
(2400 SF)
3020 SF/
0.50 FARI
1 covered in garage
(10' x 20')
+ 1 unc. in driveway
30'/2 '/z stories
DH ENVELOPE: meets requirements N/A see code
✓ Special Permit required for 32'-3" building height where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed.
This project meets all other zoning code requirements.
'(32% x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 315 SF in garage = 3335
Design Review and Special Permit for Height 1441 Bernal Avenue
Preliminary Design Review Study Meeting: On June 26, 2000, the Planning Commission reviewed this project
for preliminary design review (see attached 6/26/00 Planning Commission minutes). The Commission voted to send
the application to a design reviewer. Please note that the project has been completely redesigned. The original
submittal (plans date stamped 5/24/00) was for a first and second floor addition with an attached garage, and the
revised plans are for a new two-story house with detached garage. Concerns expressed by the Planning Commission
on the original plans included the following:
► garage is a problem, it detracts from the neighborhood character, biggest concern is garage which projects
out 11 feet to the front, prefer a detached garage or attached at the rear where it is less prominent,
neighborhood deserves a detached garage to increase privacy and setback;
► good proportion and window trim;
► house has a small entry with lots of garage;
► the flat roof at the top makes it look as if the roof is not resolved, can ask for a special permit for height to
address such a problem;
► first floor plate height should be reduced from 10' to 9';
► the rear deck is too large, 13' x 13', high above neighbors, place for people to congregate, should be reduced
to 3' x 5' so cannot be used for gatherings, or should be removed;
► mature vegetation on the left side should be preserved and the trees at the rear protected during construction
and after, need to add landscaping along the sides to break up the side wall of the house, suggest larger scale
shrubs at the front;
► with this design a detached garage would also allow the front porch to be extended, attached garage is all
right, but the pattern in the neighborhood is detached;
► absolutely there should be a detached garage, if one is to have an attached garage this is the way to do it, but
the public testimony is clear to call for a detached garage;
► these are small lots so the issue of the visual access from the kitchen on one property to the bedrooms on the
other should be addressed with window coverings and good judgment among people; and
► designer should consider the next door neighbor in placement of windows, privacy is a balance between
eliminating blank walls and the placement of windows.
The June 26, 2000 preliminary design review study meeting was noticed to surrounding property owners for the
design review application. Three neighbors commented on the project at the study meeting (see 6/26/00 minutes).
Design Reviewer Comments and Conclusions: The applicant revised the plans based on the commission's
comments prior to review by the design review consultant. The design reviewers comments date stamped July 31,
2000 are attached. The design reviewer notes that the revised plans respond very well to the commission's concerns
and recommends approval of the design review application with the condition that the front porch and entry door
area be redesigned by adding stucco partial heigh walls or railing around the porch, heavier columns (possibly
stucco), a recess for the door, and other small windows or other devices to give a more solid look that is more in
scale with the porch roof and the rest of the house. Planning staff would note that the revised plans date stamped
August 4, 2000 includes a redesigned front porch and entry per the design reviewer's recommendation.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a special permit for height, the Planning Commission must find
that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are
consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood;
2
Design Ileview and Special Permit for Height
1441 Bernal Avenue
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or
' addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and
(d) removal of any trees located within the footprint af any new structure or addition is necessary and is
consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is
appropriate.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council
on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. �rmative action should
be by resolution and include findings, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing
the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
August 4, 2000, sheets 1 through 4, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall
require an amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging
a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the plate height, roof height,
or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 24, 2000 memo shall be met; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as
amended by the City of Burlingame.
Maureen Brooks
Planner
c: Mark Robertson, applicant
3
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi n
review and s�ecial permit for height for new two-story house with detached �ara�e at 1441 Bernal
Avenue, zoned R-1, Linda Frye�propertv owner. APN: 026-�4-100;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
August 28. 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials
and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3, construction and location of limited numbers of new, small
facilities or struciures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or
more such units is hereby approved.
2. Said design review and special permit for height is approved, subject to the conditions set
forth in E�chibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit for height are as
set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Ann Kei h� ran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 28th day of August , 2000 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMIS5IONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption, design review and special permit for h�eight
1441 Bernal Avenue
effective September 5, 2000
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped August 4, 2000, sheets 1 through 4, and that any changes to the footprint or
floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or
changing the plate height, roof height, or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 24, 2000 memo shall be met; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
2
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-3997
(650) 558-7250
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
1441 BERNAL AVENUE
APN: 026-044-100
ACTION ON AN APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT
FOR A NEW TWO-STORY HOUSE AT 1441 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1.
The City ofBurlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, August
28, 2000, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning
Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to
the city at or prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For
additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
Mailed Au u� s�, Z000
♦ � . ,' �� '�� Y ��� ' ��y, Y . , � �,�'rP' �`
� r s�P � ,.� � � .. � �'�.. �. , , . ��'.
. '� .. � . , � ..ti . �..
� �
'#-P :/ � �°'v�, ` -
. .. ,:, " � �'; .
.r
- d� : - �- -x, t �
.
�_y�v�g' * ' .� � , a� .
,
. �
'��
� �ya. �.� �� � � . N ,�, . �� 1- . � , �� .
�,:
, ,
,. � .. . .., . -. . � , , � ..
k
�r � � .. . , � . ' v �� . £ �'
� �: . . � �` "•" : ,' � ' �4' � ' s .. " e��," .
. a� �'� /
.. � � ��
�., ':.�, �.�
:
� � �,
�• :WSx� PMq,.. .�� y� kx �.#i. �� ' ��:.
y' '� � �: � � Y� ...,'�.`" }. ' 1d� ���`,, � �
� ';" fr 4�. �� ���� '�Hfp, ,'�¢ ,a' .
� � �� `v" � ' x- " �",� pG
�,` � �, �, X � . yi �. s.. ��. �,� �Y �k
� - � ..-i� 4 ��� :9•i,�. , . :;= , � . . '�, ..i �^°���� , �.„
� � y }' ��^ � � �"� � � � � . � � � � � �'� t �� .
> ' ^ - x. ,�'` , �:i �
+ t 'lPM`�m�� @ ''��., � ` a � ,�.. � ui .�+ Y
� �' � ,
� s �,
� 0
_ e ' . '.. .',e � � �'� . .�:rt.�
,
. r � ..�
x
�k , ..�a. �>.. . `� ' � i , � .r-' . � �'�k. " . ,� � '..
A�
Fa:. . ,
��j ,; '�' �.i. - d .,�, i�f. � 4. +� i l �f
� .
.
� � �" � .
� :�� : � � �� � � � ,� � �
� , r -
��� ,�. �. �'� , � `� ��I �` �: '�. � �,.. ` �' .
� ^
�c , � �'. , � �� �� � � � ¢
� . �%� �. `� � � � �n ►
, .
� �.. " �iz� �`'� �' �s\O
'�� p _ ..�
�, ,
, �
k n
♦
, � �
k ..
� � .:.
• � `�. . �� � �.� .� +i �, .
�
� � , s�F � � � ' ,.� _ �`" ..
� , „
� --�
.
. , e , - . ,..t .
� �_ �
`��
� t ti� ♦ H � �� Y� a
{
: � ��`;�p : • �
�,
.
4�
. "' � ��' � ` � � �
�
M 1� $. ,� °� ., . _ �
�q ,� g � �� �'.�� * � �. � � < �:. .,�4
, .
�,� � � �
� °
� '�'. � � � � ; � � � = t �
.,
�.
�
�_ � „F �_ � r � � � .
.-
. � ., � •
,
.�. ,. . ,
� �:' r ' � ;� r°� �� :��" �t � �' - �� �
�� �s�� A� � ,, °,� � . ��: ,�,��
� �� 2041 � `� �" , ` �� � � '
n ,.� `�,�,�Y �' —��.�.��: �.� ��<
�.. ' � ,
�� _ _
_ „ � � � � : �,, �° �
.�.� ���. a F �
r , �
s;
�>" �` � ,� . � 3
. - ., ., e-� .
�, � , �
.
�
� . `.,.
� -
,. � �� �� �
� •
< ' �. ub . °�.. � . ,
A .. _.
�
> �;,�,�8
<
. �
> ` 4
�
� . i°''� �+ � - y'��
� `A d �
� � .. . � � m � \ _�.
y� i .. P _�. . _ �.�
� f"
� � �� � �
u� "l� . Y,( ��'^.1�.� � •� �`.� . . � � . 3iT fi� 1.
A
��4 f
ra ,
�
.,
�
� �
„. . ,;,
� , ,
� �y..
� ��
�. , w , �
� .���� � . � . y�-_ � �' ,
�
�- �
,
�
' ' ,� .w . ' ,.. � . . e
. ,
���,�' � ,+�,... :'i. .� � �� � `�_ � � � �a. � i .�.�� �
,
, � 7` , �
r� . _�".� + �� .'� � . . � `,„ r�:. '�B `8',� „ {�
. � '
,� F .
. �
' �` ` ..
� �� ', �., , �a1V Q � ` - �� � _ .�
��
, . , � �
� i.k�� � '� °� '� � � � �
�� � � �. � �' �� � ' � � ��Y '� � � � w ��� � t
�`, '�y��w'��pi��q�,` �. �» � n �� � �� � . :� �,: ��.. . �Y �
-�P� r � � � � ��� �.. � f � � � .. � . t�
.�:. „✓.�,Y. �a�� ..,c. �� � x`' S � _ '"� °�„
� �� �
.,
� . � a,,. �,.
�. �
/�� 4
. -
"� � �V �� � ,x' �+ � �r.� .a I#� � � �� . #
.
r � � �,"t a
� �
• � , � � �
k� , s
.
,.t
. � ,
ti.
�� � �. ' f � � ..• .ff ,.
. � �� (^�\ � .. '. �
� G= " . � � M1Y , 5 p? '.
s
" R ��
w a
� ��
^ �
r y
4 ..
. v .
� � ,
� ✓ � �a ,.
. .
,
� . , �� - -
�_ . ,
,
_
� � , ,
.� � ic
._ , .
�, , pa .
�c, a � ,, ._ . ��,, r `��. �
'. . � .� .., � � <,� �
;.
f . € - ' �' �t
��� �• ��¢�' j'1` . � � � "� , �
v
r +.
4`�' '' .: '� �t _>i �� � �� ,�
� a� ��:� f ' � � � �
_ �' , � .
_;
� - F• $,
h
. - " �;_ �° ,� �;-� � � ' � ��"�
� . .
� � � .,�", �'"x � � ` ,� _., .
�. ._ .. .� y�. .'r. _ .r.t
'� .' . � . ... _ � �� r , . � . �;- .s> :
City of Burlingame
Preliminary Design Review
First and Second Story Addition and Special Permit for Attached Garage
Item #
Address: 1441 Bernal Avenue Meeting Date: 6/26/00
Request: Design review and special permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition at 1441
Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.040 & 25.28.035)
Property Owner: Linda Frye
Applicant/Designer: Mark Robertson
Lot Area: 6000 SF
APN: 026-044-100
General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1
Date Submitted: May 4, 2000
Summary: The applicant is requesting design review and a special permit for an attached garage for a first and
second-story addition at 1441 Berna1 Avenue, zoned R-1 (plans date stamped 5/24/00). The existing one-story house
now conta.ins 1568 SF of floor area (0.26 FAR), and has 3 bedrooms. The first and second floor addition would add
an attached garage and remove two first floor bedrooms and add 3 bedrooms on the second floor, for a total of 4
bedrooms. There is an existing detached garage (13'-6" x 15'-6" interior dimensions) which will be removed. The
new attached garage will provide two covered parking spaces with staggered setbacks, each with 10' x 20' clear
interior dimensions. The addition will increase the floor area of the structure by 1442 SF, for a total floor area of
3010 SF (0.50 FAR) where 3020 SF (0.50 FAR) is the maximum floor area ratio allowed with an attached garage.
St�ff Comments: Attached
PROPOSED
SETBACKS
Front: Ist flr
Znd f lr
Side (left):
Side (right):
Rear: 1 st�r
2n flr
LOT COVERAGE:
FAR:
PARKING:
HEIGHT:
DH ENVELOPE:
27'-0" to 1 st garage door
30'-0" to 2nd garage door
3 8'-6"
9'-6"
12'-4"
26'-0"
41'-0"
32%
(1919 SF)
3010 SF/
0.50 FAR
2 covered in garage
(10' x 20' each)
+ 1 unc. in driveway
N/A
meets requirements
EXISTING
32'-0"
N/A
9'-6"
4'-0"
30'-0"
N/A
26.5%
(1588 SF)
1568 SF/
0.26 FAR
1 covered in garage
(13'-6 x 15'-6")
+ 1 unc. in driveway
28'-0"
N/A
ALLOWED/REQ'D
block average = 19'-10"
20' to 1 st gar. door/25' to 2nd
20'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
15'-0"
20'-0"
40%
(2400 SF)
3020 SF/
0.50 FARI
1 covered in garage
(10' x 20')
+ 1 unc. in driveway
30'/2'/z stories
see code
✓ Special Permit required for an attached garage. This project meets all other zoning code requirements.
1(32% x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF = 3020 SF -(no additional FAR allowed for attached garage)
Maureen Brooks
Planner
c: Mark Robertson, applicant
CITY OF EUFLINGAME
VA�IANCE APPLIC,�TIONS
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your
property which do not app/y to other properties in this area.
An existing stone wall at the north side property line creates a sli�ht pinch between itself
and the existing living room wall to be saved in our remodel. This pinch is miner — 2" to
3". We wish to use the inside face of the existing wall as our assumed P.L. to establish
our 4'-0" SYSB.
b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantia/ property �ight and what unreasonab/e property /oss o� unnecessary hardship
might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication.
Variance request is for CYA. If we use inside face of wall as layout line for SYSB, net
inside clearance for new garage between Living Rm. and SYSB may be 19-10" (just shy
of the 20'-0" clr. requirement).
c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity o� to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
Request so minor no consequence deemed noteworthy.
d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
Request so minor no consequence deemed noteworthy.
12/92 var.frm
a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your
property which do not app/y to other properties in this area. .
Do any conditions exist 4n the site which make other the alternatives to the variance impracticable or
impossible and are also not common to other properties in the area7 For example, is there a creek cuttin�
throu�h the property, an exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of
existin� structures? How is this property different from others in the neighborhood7
b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyinent of a
substantia/ property right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship
might resu/t from the denia/ of the app/ication.
Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception?
(i.e., havinp as much on-site parking or bedrooms7) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses
allowed without the exception7 Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship
on the development of the property7
c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/faie, or
convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those
propertiesl If neiphboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting,
paving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. Why will the
structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or fleneral welfare?
Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discha�ges into sewer and stormwater
systems, water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground
storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or
communicable diseasesl.
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protectionl Will alarm
systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structu�e create a nuisance or need
for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use
flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community �ood. Is the proposal consistent with the city's
policy and goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit?
Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or
parkina for this site or adjacent sitesl7 Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as
the elderly or handicapped7
d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighbo�hood7 If it does not
atfect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match
existinp architecture or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If use will affect
the way a neighborhood/area looks, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no
chanpe to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with
other structures in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhoodt Think of
character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use.
Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of
the neighborhood will change, state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the peneral vicinityl Compare
your project with existinfl uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity,
and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. ,sres�...r�
���, c�Tr ot
RIJNGAME
� '�w.,�e �
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent rvith the existing structure's design and with the existing
street and neiglaborhood.
��i ��5c I S l� �uc��t�-c �F �4 �(bttS,c �.LI(�DG-C� �NSv'�C�'/�' �'
�Z� rM�,�r,v �Dt�v� p l�r t�-�s nac� ���uc� �a ��E� Heus� Cs�;�
�� c� l��i �� �= .5�}N 5�-I �'iYLc �. g�,r�" J S Sf rVl l�.�n� Y� �i9-Jc ��
1�1�.t19 �- fl�u� � �D lr�t� li?�.-�-1, � I�f=- �`i ��t�� �jr�-n-� 6, �
�—� ��Gj� �'� b-c� ,� r w�. ►-zt= ` � �►� �� . � �rs
r� f9� � D` � �t � �� � � �S � �' �6�1t'�`� 1���'t= ►1�� .
2. plairt ow tlae va� of roof lin� e; facade, exterior fircish materials and elevations of the proposed
neiv structure or addition are consistent ivith the existing structure, sireet and rteighborhood.
r %�-c f�-S�
/N
t�v��`�
� � v�y �� � � ��� oN �
� z-� ►4-d�� �v� � �t5 ff-B-,.c�` w�s
i�°�na�V� �9�- �?� �/1�,�4�,u � �vr�s
C'�p�fvv��•��� �j �3�ll�f� k�cL�
������� �
1 �.�cc �, c�-��''�'x-��-�s ,�
,
�z,�i Y-�I� Fo�
3. Hoiv will the proposed project be coresistent with the residential desig►� guidelines adopted by the city
(C. S. 25. 57) ?
l� �Pv+� � �p r �� gy �� 1`� ��, ���i�� Drs�.uu�sc-l� 64�'V�
Z�j ��� r�F t�-N-s� e-,U 1r� �r�- +�a� ��►�� �
� � �s S�' �C. ���� � y .
�rSGr�y�/� cq-i��/�
�. �- f� �F �Eg� c pv ��" .��. . r S,v4� ` �s � -��.s �
5�-14-�.� � l'iy9"IQ �/l��'1 � I L L te1�1(sk� l�i ��� `�:� ��� fi x��'i � � S
4. Explain how the removal o f any trees locate d wit hin t he footprint o f any new structure or ad �ation �
is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requiremercts. What mitigation is proposed
for the removal of any trees? Explain ivhy this mitigation is appropriate.
1�Cr � (.� r L L �r`� �
RECEIVEp
MAY 2 4 2000
��%�r�- � ,
sp.frm/II /98
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
l. Explain why the blen�l of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of'the
new construction or atldition are consistent with the existing structure's design and
with the existing street and neighborhood.
How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties7 If
neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and
characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from
neighboring properties. Neigboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulkl If there is no change
to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other
structures in the neighborhood or area.
2. Explczin how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations
of ihe proposed new structure or addition are consisteni with the existing structure,
street and neighborhood.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhoodl
If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of
development on a�ljacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal "fits" in the neighborhood.
How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood7 Think of "character" as the image or tone
established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the
neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will the proposed project be co�asisteni with the resideiztial design guidelines
adopted by the city?
Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet
these guidelinesl
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure
or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements.
What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mi�igation
is appropriate.
Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposall If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are
"protected" under city ordinance (C.S. 1 1.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to
replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so.
sp. fim/11/98
0
ROUTING FORM
�
2
��
�
DATE: May 5, 2000
TO: C�CITY ENGINEER
�G CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
�( FIRE MARSHAL
SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
SUBJECT: Request for Design Review for second story addition at 1441 Bernal
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-044-100.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: June 12, 2000
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, May 8, 2000
THANKS,
Maureen/Janice/Ruben � � �d Date of Comments
/��e,e._�2 a.:Q-c.�t.�^ r` o �'
� r�� �� ���-������r -��� �
� -
G�, ,' � C c.�_,. ct-c.. .
/ � G(..(.1� � t.'�-�`�
� � ( � � ( e oc�--�-�
����� : �: � �-� ��
.s-�..�- '4 � � .
�' G-��.:�'-� � z'�`�� �
� ��
s� �� � �=r -2��_�"2. �.�
-�1,� �~ E, i ✓``�..� ��•�'�"-Q-
, � : ) �' L1_'_ , �� [l
� w r�-�r fc c� << j�' G'
� �/ `
.,� ,.--, •� �.:,•r e.� t �.
p. - a.� L Y G3 oA f� t 1� �.
�.-(� i..�..d..�r1.��-'}
i;
J�
� � � c_�.�-.-� ?
w-- �-y//.y�� �
C� (A��� �� �
� c.c �-G<- � ,
�� �,
�
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 5, 2000
TO: �CITY ENGINEER
�CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
�( FIRE MARSHAL
_SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
SUBJECT: Request for Design Review for second story addition at 1441 Bernal
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-044-100.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: June 12, 2000
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, May 8, 2000
THANKS,
�
Maureen/Janice/Ruben
� g Date of Comments
�o ��t.�,�-
t. �;.,' �s�--
i
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 5, 2000
TO: C�CITY ENGINEER
�G CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
�FIRE MARSHAL
_SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
_CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
SUBJECT: Request for Design Review for second story addition at 1441 Bernal
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-044-100.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: June 12, 2000
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, May 8, 2000
THANKS,
Maureen/Janice/Ruben
J` � Od Date of Comments
� �i CD--��t�. `y"�jiJ C�-,t �t�iife,s a: �Z� LfDvS�.
G'�iv
CITY OF B URLINGAME
A copy of the application and plails for this project may be reviewed prior
to the �neeting at the Plannin�� Department at 501 Primrose Road,
BUC�lllb3111e, C111f01'1111.
If you challenge the subject"application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising o��ly thos� issues you or someone else���raised at�the �ublic hearing,
described in the r�otice or in written corresponde�ce, d�li�ered to the city
at or rior to th�<. itbl�c hear� __.���� �
P � ��� � �. . � ;�:
, ,. � fA , 4� . .. t
�AMt 1,8'i ... -,n`: N".^t��,�>F
Property owners ��io, rec�i���iotice are responsi��le��or it�forming their
tenants abo'ut this��"notice ���
� �-
558-7250 Thank �Qu � ���
� a �i' `s e:
w � � " ��
Margaret M���ro�� ��
City Planner � � �� ; �''�
� �_ ��wt
��� ��
PU��,I�
(Please refer to other side)
4 I+ t �
� �.�_. �6;, /
�qx �;f,: � y�
���.�.�V�i`fiICE
�a4, e�rr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME
RUN AME PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�• � � � °�� � • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
' ��,_r�,,,,��.�'`� TEL: (650) 558-7250
1441 PERNAL AVENUE
APIV:02b-044-1��
call (650)
Study of an application for design review far pUgLIC HEARING
a first and second story addition to an NOT._ICE
�', existing single—fa�ily residence at 1441
� Hernal Avenue, zoned R—i.
jThe City of Purlingame Planning Co�awission
announces the following public hearing on ��t12
IMonday, June 25, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the �Zp�jj`��.
City Hall Council Chawbers located at 501 ��3j•
� Pri�rase Road, Burlinga�e, Califurnia. ""�""''
Mailed June 16, 2�
(Please refer to other side)
Jl JYbcc� �ll� �� J.U)UA]C°llll]I��dA,]C�ll�
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790
June 29, 2000
Mark Robertson
135 Arroyo Court, #4
San Mateo, CA 94402
Re: 1441 Bernal Avenue
Dear Mr. Robertson,
The Planning Commission reviewed your application for a design review permit at their study hearing on June 26,
2000 and recommended that the project be reviewed by a design review consultant before it returns to the
Planning Corrunission for final review and approval. The draft minutes of the Planning Commission hearing are
enclosed for your review. The Planning Commission identified the following issues which need to be addressed:
► garage is a problem, it detracts from the neighborhood character, biggest concern is garage which projects
out 11 feet to the front, prefer a detached garage or attached at the rear where it is less prominent,
neighborhood deserves a detached garage to increase privacy and setback;
► good proportion and window trim;
► house has a small entry with lots of garage;
► the flat roof at the top makes it look as if the roof is not resolved, can ask for a special permit for height
to address such a problem;
► first floor plate height should be reduced from 10' to 9';
► the rear deck is too large, 13' x 13', high above neighbors, place for people to congregate, should be
reduced to 3' x 5' so cannot be used for gatherings, or should be removed;
► mature vegetation on the left side should be preserved and the trees at the rear protected during
construction and after, need to add landscaping along the sides to break up the side wall of the house
suggest larger scale shrubs at the front; �
► with this design a detached garage would also allow the front porch to be extended, attached garage is
all right, but the pattern in the neighborhood is detached;
► absolutely there should be a detached garage, if one is to have an attached garage this is the way to do it,
but the public testimony is clear to call for a detached garage; and
► these are small lots so the issue of the visual access from the kitchen on one property to the bedrooms on
the other should be addressed with window coverings and good judgment among people;
► designer should consider the next door neighbor in placement of windows, privacy is a balance between
eliminating blank walls and the placement of windows.
Mark Robertson
Page 2
June 29, 2000
In order for staff to track and process your application materials in a timely fashion, please notify us by
Wednesd�y, July 5, 2000 as to whether you wish to forward the same plans reviewed by the Planning
Commission directly to the design reviewer, or whether you would prefer to modify the plans to address the
Corrunission's concerns before the project is reviewed. Unless you tell us to forward the plans as is to the design
review consultant, your application at this time is considered incomplete. If you choose to redesign your plans,
we would request that you resubmit the revised plans within 120 days or the project will be considered inactive.
Please call me at (650) 558-7253 if you have and questions, and to let me know how you wish to proceed with
the application.
Sincerely,
���
Maureen Brooks
Planner
c: Linda Frye
�� CITY �
� �
BURLrIJ�C�AME
"��., �,.�. �
Job Address:
Date of Plans:
Job Description:
City of Burlingame
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ssg_�z5o
� Plan Review Comments
1441 Berna1 Avenue �lS�"�"'� � � �'4 (� b
Ma� 4, 2000
Design Review for a first and second stor� addition
LOT SIZE � �� � ��� = ��v�) 6�
LOT COVERAGE
COMMENTS
_ _._ _
EXISTII�IG PROPOSED ` ' ALL(?WED/REQ'D '
_
;; ;
I�f :�J� h.Uu� �� �`i S� 40% X �t�� SF
a �i sr- ��� .
��v ��' `�� ��rt v'"�'c� ' '�,�C� � �'� ' �-;��' ��' � �'�'� '
� ��
FLOOR AREA RATIO
PROPOSEDr
/3 �� 5� hm�� Iq I 1 S� I`�t�[v
� �t S� ��f�- 10�°I �F �� �r
�
���
\ fDL"lllil
CORNER LOT
32% X SF + 900 SF
(+ 350 SF DET. GARAGE)
INTERIOR LOT
32% X(O�� SF + 1100 SF
(�'
,
� S ..: +rt v v t ,� '+� ;s �c. �. , s . � ..... � �, ,.. .
COMMENTS � � � � ,� . n�� -{ �-'� ;; "�"v-� �� I4. �°.. r�'„��' C
��� �Nk L...��I. h/�� � �'.,_�:r'�'� �. tn ��.�IYV�./�. C�_ .�. f_ ..i1-rV I �"� � �.�i )
!f Y . .
� Q F—
Planning Department Plan Review Comments
SETBACKS'
E�
3a 1_Q I�
r,.� ��
G� � qir
la'-�"
�'- o ".
COMMENTS '
, p�c �u��c�C� �c_�f-�.� �.C��;� ��� a�-
� ��,
ac�e�r�� �- o �
HEIGHT
COMMENTS
Page 2
j� t'°�2 �c,�;- � �"�1�� _ �R�� � �' � � - i � �'
�
PRC�POSED ` ALLQ�ED/1ZE�'D ,
a�1 f— U�� -�v ���<<���� � 15� �� OCK
, ,, � ' �� � � �� -occxr'
30 �� -}-� �.w�a� ��' AVG. �rP �,(c�1'/
�_ � rr
n� r�ncc,vc�
��_�«
��� ��r
��z►- � �`
�.�� o���
Zo�
�t' — p i�
� f_G � �
15'
Zo�
� ���v�
��
--�- � _��. � �1 � r�-� �!►�.�u!4� ��:��.d..�.',�..�--�CM G � �� �'/h. �@. t���"['�
..� "�
.t.�� � l�r�.� . �' •
GI� a ��.d.� ��� � t �-��', -� c�� ��+.�,�� (�,�—
DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE
� r�` i ��r � a: '?'-�6i
LEFT SIDE POINT OF DEPARTURE ,— 3-� J�f-�- I'I� ��
� � _G,_a��
RIGHT SIDE POINT OF DEPARTURE �.} (,�'°. � `�� � (-- � i (p �� �; � �'
COMMENTS °i��`l�Y �
��-�. °� dQ�� n `�'Y��2� �rc�-��"'.,�
� 1� i �. � �� � �� �r.�
"' (��Q �� I�c. hC � a� � � ��-�`�`:� '°t,� o� � V
� �� _
(,�' � �r ( f � �`'� � `'' �. �` p�l � ..!% � - a `-S �� �r/t (�-� f � � �
� 1,.��-� .�...� � J'� � '��; � ��F , i /;�. ,�r�.
� (�— -- d � � � c' .�O'? (ti r .� �,c.�%
�
Planning Department Plan Review Comments
NUMBER OF BEDROOMS
r
PARKING
COMMENTS
Page 3
_ __._.
EXISTING '' PRQ�'QSED ' ALLOWED/REQ'D
� COVERED SPACES oZ COVERED SPACES � COVERED SPACES
I /�
��j'6x �5 �-(�r� i-!al �, �-a (10'-0�� x 20�-0��)
+ 1 UNCOVERED + 1 UNCOVERED + 1 UNCOVERED
� :� t�.,�f €' ��.lf f;t � ����'�
�� f �j,� �si�'o c,, ���%��.,L �Qsz`�'S Ca ` � � C�'
� �., . �
� ' r-� ]O - v �
L�-e°t,'! C�'V G(�t./F�v�..C: t,t. � �� t«� •� y,�'�'`%-�' �rl; t�.� t..� �
oJ�1 ��� �� �iG. t� _.(� ��.�,lr: .!��'..� �Q (J�.� l'�.JL�'� �� �Q� � � �
� V ( ��
t� _ �-�C.. I� v� ��'�-CL�"'� � Q'� ��� -�, Q �
. . -. r i �
C`xe cz �+���-w:,�.¢,�2 r�c.r<_�� r�, c�.o -��.�,.�c� �G J
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
�i�1�- —�i f� m.r f a�..� Q—�� C�� CGc.�"Z�M Gz� �.%�.P�
�-�i�Q. //��-�- C9`i Yl.��r�'�` �.it�l G�.,�_ C"•C-�,�(li,Q_C�4 �J����/"��
� c�.�.-� �_�.P�.� c.�. �J..�c� c;,
oK S,P.
�, PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP FOR PROPERTY Q U�' V�QC��' /�� ����� �
c'�...�`t�'-E��`�%�4�... �`
n PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE TREES, AS
WELL AS ANY TREES TO BE PLANTED ON PROPERTY
(NOTE: FRUIT TREES ARE NOT DEFINED AS "LANDSCAPE TREES" PER C.S. 11.06)
THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE � LANDSCAPE TREES
�J -� � `�- °��-� ���crn `��-f-� r
�
DATE PLANS REVIEWED �J (-! �%U REVIEWED BY MdULt�%la ��(/ �
� EXISTING NON-CONFORMING CONDITION
�i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
� ,
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior
to the meetin� at the' Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlin�anle, California. , _
If you challenge the subject ap�lication(s) in court, you may. be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at�the public hearing,
described iiT the notice pr in written eorresponde�ca�d�liuered to the city
at or prior to the,pit��iG k��a�j�ig,� A; r.; ti, `` ����� �.�� �
� � w ' `
� � r�� t - �; � c. �
� u ��.� � ��n � � `�� �� ,�• �� '��
Property ov�ners v��iq rec�i �� � otice are responsib� �or i�orming their
tenants abo�'t thi�� rio1
558-7250. T�ank � �u.
�, ��.
�= ` �
Margaret M�c��o��
City Planner �`�,
�`����
PU�
�' �' c�ditional informatio � ple e call (650)
� �#�,� m �� ,��,���..
t� �� p �
�� � �
�'
� ��` ��
w����' ,, �
� _ ��Ri�����'�CE
(Please refer to other side)
�r�, cirr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BIJRLJNSiAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�' BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
1441 RERNAL AVENUE AF�N:��6-044-1��
Study of an application for design review for pUgLIC HEARING
a first �nd second story addition to an NOT._ICE
existing single—f�mily residence at 1441
Hernal Aven��e, zoned R-1.
The City of Burlingame Planning Co�aission
announces the fallowing public hearing on ��,p,�lZ
Monday, June 26, 2000 at 7:00 P. M. in the ��p'p:��.
City Hall Council Cha�bers located at 5�1 �j;�.(3y;•
Pri�rose Raad, Burlinga�e, Califarnia. """"" '
Mailed dune lb, c0�
(Please refer to other side)
= M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y R E P O R T =
San Ma teo (GA)
***********�****�***��*��*����*��****�*******************************�*********��******�******
* Date :05/09/2000 Prepared By : *
* Time :00:00:00 Prepared For: *
* Report Type :SINGLELN.TCF Company :APN: 026-044-100 *
* Sort Type :PARCEL Address :1441 BERNAL AVENUE *
* Parcels Printed :68 City/ST/Zip :BURLINGAME CA 94010 *
*************************************�************+*******�************�������***********�����
�����*��*******�����***********
* Search Parameters *
�**������**�*�*************��*�
Parcel Number...68
026 053 O10 thru 026 053 050
026 053 130 thru 026 053 180
026 054 O10 thru 026 054 060
026 054 130 thru 026 054 180
027 169 O10 thru 027 164 030
027 164 180
027 164 190
027 162 O10 thru 027 162 030
027 162 170 thru 027 162 190
027 143 010
026 044 030 thru 026 044 160
026 044 170 thru 026 044 200
026 043 050 thru 026 043 190
MetroScan / San Mateo (CA)
Parcel Number Owner Name
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
026
027
027
027
027
027
Site Address
1461
1457
1453
1449
1445
1441
1437
1436
1440
1444
1450
1452
1456
1460
1464
1469
1465
1461
1457
1453
1449
1445
1441
1437
1436
1940
1944
1448
1452
1456
1462
1464
1970
1433
1429
1425
1421
1417
1412
1416
1420
1429
1428
1432
1433
1429
1925
1921
1417
1413
1412
1416
1420
1424
1428
1432
2100
1433
2104
2108
2111
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlinqam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Drake Ave Burlingam
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinqa
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Bernal Ave Burlinga
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Vancouver Ave Burli
Poppy Dr Burlingame
Vancouver Ave Burli
Hale Dr Burlingame
Hale Dr Burlingame
Poppy Dr Burlingame
The Information Provided Is Deemed F:eliable, Bi�t Is Not Guai-anteed.
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
043
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
044
053
053
053
053
053
053
053
053
053
053
053
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
054
143
162
162
162
162
050
060
070
080
090
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
030
040
050
060
070
080
090
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
O10
020
030
040
O50
130
140
150
160
170
180
010
020
030
040
050
060
130
140
150
160
170
180
O10
010
020
030
170
Pollard Steven C & Ros
Jeide Antoinette M
Quinn-Chen Deborah & C
Ambus Peggy
Bean Marjorie A Tr
Kilki Sait & Tassie Tr
Broz Milo E
Flores Ann Marie
Dejesus Miguel A & Kat
Crosatto David J Tr
Swift James W& Mary F
Nappi Frank Edward & M
Danielsen Thomas H & V
Walsh John P & Jennife
Flahavan Stephen C & L
Dombek Regina Tr
Silverman Andrew L & C
Hosking Gordon & Marjo
Gogarty Henry A & Wini
Gogarty Henry A & Wini
Andreini Gary & Kathle
Packard Mary C
Golovin Alexander L Tr
Mckay Ruth I Tr
Grandinetti Michael A
Marchetti Joseph J & F
Millet Jim A & Barbara
Detweiler Bruce C & Su
Simonetti Oriano & P J
Feix Donald C & Sharon
Naughton James G
Mcginty Gail A Tr
Schembri Charles J
Della Pietra John & H
Torres Anthony M & Nan
Vann Charles & Ann-Mar
Asimos Dean;Asimakopou
Somers Patrick M & Lau
Kirchner Richard & Reb
Cretan Clifford V & Pa
Olson Stuart J
Mcgovern Jon & Kelly
Arnold Henry K
Serefiddin Ravil & Nur
Coel Molly Tr
Bell Beth J
Carr Nicki T
Savoie Robert N & Cand
Wright Anne Keeler & T
Germanov Emil Tr
Calderilla Marie A
Minden Lori
Mcdonald John & Lara
Alper Philip R & Jeann
Munoz Elizabeth K Tr
Weismann Fern O Tr
Technomet Capital Inc
Galante Dana M
Olivier Pamela K & Bru
Lewis Kenneth A & Mary
Marshall Raymond C & L
YB Owner Phone
1920
1929
1926
1929
1929
1912
1925
1925
1926
1926
1928
1924
1956
1951
1990
1925
1926
1926
1908
1948
1929
1926
1926
1926
1941
1941
1927
1931
1921
1925
1927
1912
1954
1939
1927
1924
1927
1926
1924
1924
1925
1926
1994
1923
1921
1925
1920
1920
1913
1924
1926
1990
1925
1925
1924
1925
1924
1926
1926
1924
1929
650-344-1992
650-342-1256
650-347-2855
650-347-7914
650-344-6950
650-375-8155
650-342-3243
650-343-2070
650-342-7650
650-548-0944
650-342-1106
650-344-5970
650-375-0309
650-343-1555
650-343-7984
650-344-0853
650-343-9129
650-344-2696
650-340-8154
650-344-4096
650-344-3032
650-685-9436
650-344-1804
650-344-9033
650-342-7674
650-344-2486
MetroScan / San Mateo (CA)
Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
027 162 180 Ho Henry C& Recina S 2105 Poppy Dr Burlingame 1929
027 162 190 Jancsek Joel P& Suzan 1449 Vancouver Ave Burli 1940
027 164 010 Lico James A& Margare 2101 Hale Dr Burlingame 1929 650-685-4695
027 164 020 Flygare John A& Paola 1419 Vancouver Ave Burli 1927 650-375-1025
027 164 030 Burt Dennis E& Rosali 1917 Vancouver Ave Burli 1928 650-348-2170
027 164 180 Norton Richard A Tr 2109 Hale Dr Burlingame 1958
027 164 190 Kiesel George T& Char 2105 Hale Dr Burlingame 1927 650-344-4960
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not GuaranLeed.
� � � A v � _ . . .. 1 � � •1 � ,�, \ �
;' ., r� 50 07 0 , o , � ,,,, , � ;; a' ` o �
� oqe . O j 11 1. co�T\� 1; a
� � Ok
Ol 05 �
,5 .•y1 N 1 O 'c N `' `�1' ', N pZ �E 1 , N
....:''25 �5550 � 11 N O ` N � . ` �l, 5� 1 0� `` ` ` 1 0
�
1 1 25 1'�� `O 1` O � ` � � � °5 . ��p O � N � 11 �1 ` o
� O
1 � ` �*�,� � 1 � °-� �.05 cA 1 N 1 � 1 \ � 1 �O � 1 05
1 � \\ . � 5� � N �, 1 ,1 O, ,� 1 a1
O N , \ ' 1 ob Ok OL
1 �, � `D N " � `"s ' � `,. 1, 05 °Z. .: o�
, 50 ' N c� � N � �� O 5Z 5L ;5p
' 25 25 ' O � � � O o5 ... p5
, � 1 y1� �
� � � ; . . \
' b � M ` � , 05 1 yo 55N . O�
� M ^
��' � 1 1� � `' O �� �3�d - , . � � � � `
� �� � � . � o �, . � `,
,1 l ; a s ^ 1
� ' . A✓E� 5 �, U �1 � ,` �
'', � 1 � , .. " �=.-;--��.,__ � O ` ��� � � ,
, .. • O O , + 11 � �` `1 r
.. � 55 o a `rl �;- q� � \ ` `' ch � � � � . .. N \�
O N � � - N �,�
_ ,
a � ,
. O
� << N
.. O - p � 05 � � '� ,� �',
� h � � � � o ��.a � N ��� ,
� � �`� � �; � 1 � op � � � 05 � � � N � � �
� �' � 1 � \ . 5 O� N � O � `
, � N t� '�
`,,` � , ,
�:� �., c� . , � �� 0 � � \ .
, �. ���, �J . � � �, .� �. � `
� \ `- O �
.. � � 1 �
� � 1 �, 1
, � ti b 1 � ` ` � c� M qC .551i . �
r� � �� 1 0 5° �3�d , ' O � �
, ,� ,
, �, �
� � ` '1 1 `` O � 5 `: � O O '� r,
`'� � �'`, � �`� � � AVE• �� �d , °� ' 0 � .�,��,���� �� � I
1 � � '�� � . � A5' � � � � � � � �
i � 5�. � �`� i.
ti ! O - ` � I
O � �t 5b
. N55 pA `N O � � .. ��. 05 � � I
O N - � NI
BERNA� . � ''` O � > � p7 ` � � "' � �'
.. O ` o y �,
� ;, O` `� �` �' ,� Q� p5 o y o5 � N I,
� �,`.
`� • 50 ' tl � N �
O 1 O � ' ' A5 � N a. . O i
\\ N 11 1 ` � � 50' N v � �.` .
'� , �' Vi � . � � .� � � O � 11 05 �
� � r
�
\ �o '
� ���, � �\ � � � � � � "�' � ` � ��, � �� �` � M �a`��" '
� N . .� �' � � ,
� 05 � µ55 0� £.o
�h O yd �r
� . ; ,, � � �, O
� c�j 1 � a5' , : G o• � 4 (
� ��� � 1 � � 5� g' ` 5 ` O
x
`� �
\ � ' $1 i �,` b .. �\2� •�, 2 �
o �,, , �, ,; • � E R 6�
' � �Q
� 1� "-1' �� a;� '� O 1 ; �w VAN�� v o. g Q O��3.305 ���' � � g
ry `�1 �� �5 p N55 t1 I .�i. i (�
_ � '`'� 0' x � 5 1 �..
.f s 6 �
N` �.5� '• `� ° � S � � � � � 9 `'12�
O 5a � , g. 9 IO � � Q � ` •4 5o Y `= __ �
5o A�� 5° < � � � o q
\. ;�1 • IZ O � �8 `Zq!15�� 5 I3 �`
N55��'w ��° o �., „ IB 9 �� 3 • I/i
s '°�y,,
� 8 ` `i., �.. ` O �-....-�� ., . 6c
�to T g�— 1�0 �� Q _ � �3 4�J o j1 \3�.83 45 �N
� — N O
� m 13 � 9 0� �� 8 ; �5� � 2 i i
uo � � O
� _ Ilo_ — — �� O � �d � , � - j �p
. � i2 6 � � ,. n a
CITY OF BURLINGAME
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO )
Erika Lewit , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
that she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the City of
Burlingame on the 16th day of June, 2000, she deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE
OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed
to the perspns listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit:
that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to NOTICE OF
HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day
there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses attached
hereto.
� ,
�_%_ —�
1441 BERNAL AVENUE
,�r�' `� � CITY OF BURLINGAME
BURLJN�SAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�-. BURLINGAME, CA 94010
: o. .
TEL: (650) 558-7250
1441 BERNAL AVENUE
Application for design review amendment to an
approved new two-story single family dwelling
at 1441 Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1.
(APN: 026-044-100)
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Tuesdav, Mav 29, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the
City Hall Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed May 18, 2001
(Pdease refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF B URLINGAME
A copy of the applicay�n and=`��a �s"� �p ay be reviewed prior
to the meeting at the� Plat�ng� D par�, nent �.� ;Q1 Primrose Road,
re ,�,*� � �:
Burlingame, Cali�rriia.' " �� ���
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court; you may! be limited to
raising only .ihose issues you o�� someoz�e else raised at the„�c�blic hearing,
described in the notice or in written coz�espondeuca �d.�liuered to the city
at or prior tp the i�ublic hearing, ,��� �,: � ���'� �.t.�.;�. �
`���. �
�� ���
Properry ow�ers �ho receive >this notice are r�sponsib7e;'foi informing their
tenants abojut this° �notice. For � additi�nal information� ple�se call (650)
558-7250. Thank you. .
.� '.��� �
' 4f �t� � M �$�� � 5 .
&` _ " �' '#� A
Margaret Monro�' ��5� i'� ` ��� � ,f'�
�
City Planner � °� '"�� '�� ��� '`��
k, < � �;•���. ��g ° rd:r<,
PUBLfC `HEARING N,�TICE
(Please refer to other side)
= M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y R E P O R T =
San Mateo (CA)
**********************************************************************************************
* Date :05/17/2001 Prepared By : *
* Time :00:00:00 Prepared For:MAY 29, 2001 PC MEETING *
* Report Type :SINGLELN.TCF Company :APN: 026-044-100 *
* Sort Type :PARCEL Address :1441 BERNAL AVENUE *
* Parcels Printed :68 City/ST/Zip :BURLINGAME CA 94010 *
**********************************************************************************************
*******************************
* Search Parameters *
*******************************
Parcel Number...68
026 053 O10 thru 026 053 050
026 053 130 thru 026 053 180
026 054 O10 thru 026 054 060
026 054 130 thru 026 054 180
027 164 O10 thru 027 164 030
027 164 180
027 164 190
027 162 O10 thru 027 162 030
027 162 170 thru 027 162 190
027 143 O10
026 044 030 thru 026 044 160
026 044 170 thru 026 044 200
026 043 050 thru 026 043 190
MetroScan / San Mateo (CA)
Parcel # Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
026 043 050 Pollard Steven C/Rosa M 1461 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1920
026 043 060 Jeide Antoinette M 1457 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1929
026 043 070 Quinn Chen Deborah Et A1 1453 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1926
026 043 080 Ambus Peggy 1449 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1929
026 043 090 Bean Marjorie A Tr 1445 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1929
026 043 100 Kilki Sait & Tassie Trs Et 1441 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1912 650-342-1256
026 043 110 Momtaheni Nasser C/Neli H 1437 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1925
026 043 120 Flores Ann Marie 1436 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1925
026 043 130 Dejesus Miguel A& Kathlee 1440 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 043 140 Crosatto David J Tr 1444 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926 650-347-2855
026 043 150 Swift James W& Mary F 1450 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1928 650-347-7914
026 043 160 Nappi Frank Edward/Mary Fr 1452 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1924
026 043 170 Danielsen Thomas H& Vivia 1456 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1956
026 043 180 Walsh John P/Jennifer G 1460 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1951 650-344-6950
026 043 190 Flahavan Stephen C& Lilli 1464 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1990 650-375-8155
026 044 030 Dombek Regina Tr 1469 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1925 650-342-3243
026 044 040 George John K 1465 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 044 050 Hosking Gordon/Marjorie 1461 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 044 060 Gogarty Henry A& Winifred 1457 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1908
026 044 070 Gogarty Henry A& Winifred 1453 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1948
026 044 080 Andreini Gary & Kathleen 1449 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1929
026 044 090 Packard Mary C 1445 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 044 100 Frye Linda D 1441 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 044 110 Ruth Mckay Trust 1989 1437 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 044 120 Grandinetti Michael A& L 1436 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1941
026 044 130 Marchetti Franca M 1440 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1941
026 044 140 Millet Jim A& Barbara L 1444 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1927
026 044 150 Detweiler Bruce C& Susan 1448 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1931 650-344-5970
026 044 160 Simonetti Oriano & P J Trs 1452 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1921 650-375-0309
026 044 170 Feix Donald C& Sharon S T 1456 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1925 650-343-1555
026 044 180 Naughton James G 1462 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1927 650-343-7984
026 044 190 Mcginty Gail A Tr 1464 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1912 650-344-0853
026 044 200 Schembri Charles J 1470 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1954
026 053 O10 Della Pietra John & H M 1433 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1939
026 053 020 Torres Anthony M& Nancy 1429 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1927 650-344-2696
026 053 030 Vann Charles & Ann-Margare 1425 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1924
026 053 040 Asimos Dean;Asimakopoulos 1421 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1927
026 053 050 Somers Patrick M& Laura F 1417 Drake Ave Burlingame 9 1926 650-340-8159
026 053 130 Kirchner Richard & Rebecca 1412 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1924 650-344-409E
026 053 140 Cretan Clifford V& Patric 1416 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1924
026 053 150 Dow Todd A 1420 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1925
026 053 160 Mc Govern Jon T& Kelly 1424 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1926
026 053 170 Rich Todd William/Denise M 1428 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1994
026 053 180 Serefiddin Ravil & Nuriye 1432 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1923
026 054 O10 Tam Wing M;Kiyota Noreen N 1433 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1921
026 054 020 Bell Betty J 1429 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1925
026 054 030 Car Olga Et A1 1425 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1920
026 054 040 Roddy Peter S;Grier Linda 1421 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1920
026 054 050 Wright Anne Keeler & Trent 1417 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1913
026 054 060 Germanov Emil Tr 1413 Bernal Ave Burlingame 1924
026 054 130 Calderilla Marie A 1412 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1926
026 054 140 Minden Lori 1416 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1990
026 054 150 Mc Donald John M& Lara M 1420 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1925
026 054 160 Alper Philip R& Jeanne B 1424 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1925
026 054 170 Munoz Elizabeth K Tr 1428 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1924
026 054 180 Weismann Richard M Trustee 1432 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1925
027 143 O10 Technomet Capital Inc 2100 Poppy Dr Burlingame 94 1924
027 162 O10 Galante Dana M 1433 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1926
lnformation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
MetroScan / San Mateo (CA)
Parcel # Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
027 162 020 Olivier Pamela K& Bruce E 2104 Hale Dr Burlingame 940 1926
027 162 030 Lewis Kenneth A& Mary A T 2108 Hale Dr Burlingame 940 1924
027 162 170 Marshall Raymond C& Linda 2111 Poppy Dr Burlingame 94 1929 650-344-2486
027 162 180 Ho Henry C& Recina S Lam 2105 Poppy Dr Burlingame 94 1929 650-558-1168
027 162 190 Jancsek Joel P/Suzanne M 1449 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1940
027 164 O10 Lico James A& Margaret R 2101 Hale Dr Burlingame 940 1929 650-685-4695
027 164 020 Flygare John A& Paola P 1419 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1927 650-375-1025
027 164 030 Burt Dennis E& Rosalie V 1417 Vancouver Ave Burlinga 1928 650-348-2170
027 164 180 Norton Richard A Tr 2109 Hale Dr Burlingame 940 1958
027 164 190 Kiesel George T& Charlott 2105 Hale Dr Burlingame 940 1927 650-344-4960
/nformation compiled frons various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representatrons
or warran[ies as to the accuracy or canpleteness of information contained in this report.
a
CITY OF BURLINGAME
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO )
Sean O'Rourke , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
that he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, that acting for the
City of Burlingame on the 18`" day of May , 2001, he
deposited in the United States Post Office a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a
copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the
persons listed on the addresses attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit:
that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to
NOTICE OF HEARING pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of
Burlingame that on said day there was regular communication by
United States Mail to the addresses attached hereto.
�.�.. d �'�� ��18%1
1441 BERNAL AVENUE