HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Permit` � �'�_.
;
(`��.e (�ttg uf ��trXtn��tztt.e
CITV HAL� - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD re�� (415) 696-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUR�INGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 Fnx (415) 342-6386
September 21, 1993
Ann Marie Flores and Viktor T. Pochron
1436 Bernal Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the
September 13, 1993 Planning Commission approval of your special permit
application became effective September 21, 1993. This request was for
roof height of a new detached garage 3" from rear property line at 1436
Bernal Avenue, zoned R-1.
The September 13, 1993 minutes of the Planning Commission state your
application was approved with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department and date stamped August 25, 1993, Sheets
1 through 4;
��
2. that condition #2 of the City Engineer's memo dated August 30,
1993 shall be met; and
3. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of
Burlingame.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate
application to the Building Department. This approval is valid for one
year during which time a building permit must be issued. One extension
of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if
application is made before the end of the first year.
Sincerely yours,
�������1 ��
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
Att/
cc: Dave Howell, Peninsula Drafting Service (w/att.)
Chief Building Inspector (w/att.)
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office (Lot 30, Block 46,
Easton Addition Burlingame No. 4; APN 026-043-120)
A
pnneed m�eryUeO pq�c t J
C
ROUTING FORM
DATE: � �� �
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�
AT
� CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL �
PARRS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR ' � �� ���'j�'� ��-- -�-�
(v
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION..,AC�.A�I MEETING: S �
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY• C7
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
�� ` %��� ��,�
a �
%�j,� ' �s��`��`��
.�
/' ..� r,�
Date of Comments
� Lz7�G �7�� �
/ ��� . �.
' ������ � �� Ut��
- - ��� ���,� ��� � Q
��� �2� � i�� � � ����"v
f �� .� ���-7`
���� ��
� � ,
, - o �_���.e i��-�.�`�-.
��- ��'��` �����
' �/
- � � �...�.P ��
� �. �� � , �
�,, �,,�'� w�� ��� i��, �� � � �
� .�-� ��� � �`� _
� ����
� -
_ � _,.� � /..
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 4
September 13, 1993
Ma cia Miller who was out of town. Commission/Mrs. Miller discussion:
the metal storage shed was put in about a year ago; a Commissioner
note there is ceiling area in the front of the garage which has been
finis d off with room for a window on the street front, he a,���ed if
this at`�ic area is intended to be used for storage and how ����will be
accessed;�,�Mrs. Miller replied there is a pull down ladder i��f``the middle
of the att�c area, it is in use now. Regarding how lon ,�he shed will
be needed f storage, Mrs. Miller stated until her da g'hter's
ex-husband fi ds a house and can remove the furnit��e stored there;
shed is built o,�an existing slab, she thought therQ would be a use for
it after the furn�ure was removed for garden equi,pfient, etc. , it could
be taken down but sii,e would rather not, it cou]�d'� be moved.
�-. �
Jay de Wolfe, 1212 Edgeh�ill Drive, spoke in fat�ior: his front door faces
this ro ert and he a�,reciates their ,�ebuilding the garage; he
P P Y
thanked the city for notic`Y,�g the neigh ors about this proposal and
hoped to be notified of all proposed cpfistruction in the area. City
Attorney commented on this st�temen�a• later: there are hundreds of
building permits issued every month �`or projects which conform to code
and are not noticed to the neighbor,s�,, it would be an impossible task to
notice all proposals which obe��` the,, laws. There were no further
audience comments and the publ�.�hearii�g was closed.
,�
,�. `
C. Jacobs stated she had ma�fa site inspection, if the shed is moved
3' from side property lin� she saw no problem, many people have such
accessory structures, the� 'neighbors have not complained, the new garage
will improve the neigh�t5rhood. C. Jacobs moved for approval of this
special permit for ty�o accessory structures b
following condition (1) that the Y,resolution with the
�
the plans submitte �to the Planning Departmenta and datelstampedhAugust
12, 1993; (2) th the conditions of the memos of the Chief Building
Official and Fi Marshal (8/30/93) shall be met by relocating the shed
so that it is '-0" from the rear property line; (3) that a retroactive
building per"it and penalty fees shall be paid for the installation of
the metal orage shed; (4) that a 24" box tree shall be planted before
the buii ng permit is finaled; and (5) that the project shall meet all
the re irements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as
amend by the City of Burlingame.
Mo ion was seconded by C. Graham and approved on a 5-2 roll call vot;e,
ers Galligan and Mink voting no. Appeal procedures were advised. '�
6. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ROOF HEIGHT OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON REAR
PROPERTY LINE AT 1436 BERNAL AVENUE ZONED R-1
Reference staff report, 9/13/93, with attachments. CP Monroe reviewed
details of the request, staff comments, required findings. Letter
listing concerns (received after preparation of the staff report) was
noted from Janet Costa, 1417 Bernal Avenue. Three conditions were
suggested for consideration at the public hearing.
r
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 5
September 13, 1993
Commission/staff discussed the easement at the rear, how height of the
garage is determined. Staff advised if Commission wished it could
include a maximum height for the garage in the conditions.
Chm. Deal opened the public hearing. Ann Marie Flores and Viktor
Pochran, applicants and property owners, were present. They advised
they had decided to replace rather than repair their garage, had
understood 500 SF and a maximum height of 14' to be conforming; their
property backs onto the easement, neighbors to the rear are at a higher
grade, they do not think continuing the roof will have an impact, this
permit is just for continuing the gable roof for the last few feet of
the roof line; they have had a survey done. Regarding Mrs. Costa's
letter, about four years ago the Costas made an application and Ms.
Flores wrote a letter questioning the project's suitability, she
thought this might have caused Mrs. Costa's letter of concerns. Their
house is ±18' in height, it is taller than 14'-8".
There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Mink found that if the pattern of the neighborhood is followed where
garages are built up against the easement line and there is still a 10'
space between buildings, this proposal would not be detrimental to the
community or the neighborhood. Based on testimony given and
information received C. Mink moved for approval of the special permit
by resolution with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall
be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and
date stamped August 25, 1993, Sheets 1 through 4; (2) that condition #2
of the City Engineer's memo dated August 30, 1993 shall be met; and (3)
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by C. Ellis with the comment there is a garage
behind with a huge blank wall, those neighbors will not be affected,
and there is the 10' easement which does separate the properties.
Further comment: most garages in this area are built right up to the
property line because of the easement, this project fits in with all
the garages in the area.
Motion was approved 7-0 on roll call vote. Appeal procedures were
advised.
• ENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO COMBINE FOUR LOTS INTO ONE 3.2
�''� �'-LQ,�T„ S 7, 8, 9, 10 AND PORTION OF LOT 6, INGOLD SDALE
ThinrTemnTrr ..,,��. __ _______
Reference staff report, 9/13/93,""""`°ta�t ��a^c m nts. CE Erbacher
discussed review criteria, study meet' g'qu ' ns. One condition was
suggested if this map is recomm d to City Coun'��1,.��
Chm. Deal opened the p ic hearing. Jim Whitehead, pro t
advised the P �""owner,
y purc�2 the 30 Ingold Road property in 1986 and have
RESOLUTION NO. 42-93
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT
PLEASE RETURN RECORDED
COPY T0:
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
PLANNING DEPT. WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application
CITY OF BURLINGAME has been made for a special permit for roof height of an accessory
501 PRIMROSE ROAD structure on rear property line at_ 1436 Bernal Avenue (APN 026-
BURLINGAME, CA 94010 043-120); Ibropertv owner: Ann Marie Flores/Viktor T Pochron 1436
Bernal Avenue, Burlinqame CA 94010 ); and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the
City of Burlingame on September 13. 1993 , at which time it reviewed
and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning
Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted
and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it
is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project
set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a
categorical exemption, Sec. 15303, New construction or conversion of
small structures Class 3(e), is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set
forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such special permit
are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution
be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
�
CHAIRMAN
I� RUTH E. JACOBS , Secretary of the Planning
Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of SeAtember ,
1993 , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
COMMISSIONERS: DEAL, ELLIS, GALLIGAN, GRAHAM, JACOBS, KELLY, MINK
COMMISSIONERS: NONE
COMMISSIONERS: NONE
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and
correct copy of the document it purports to be,
the original of which is on file in my office.
Dat e : �) � I�j�i3
1J �►�;��-�L�_
Margaret P�o ro , City Planner
�� fli yf,' �' , l��' U G' `
SEC TARY
REC�IVED
NQU 9 -1993
CG
f.�.7
O�
C.T7
�
C_.�
CITY Of BURLtNGAME
vtnN►uiMr near
�
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval, special
permit, 1436 Bernal Avenue
(effective September 21, 1993)
R�
co
�r�
�,� tr
�lf=
iC
B�
�
r r- � � ,,
� �3 1 �� v ��� � �
?tECORDED AT � �. �'JEST OF
'93 SEP 29 A(� 8 0�
:�.'.K1, ;:; SLOCUM RECURDER
SAN MAT�O COUt�iT�'
OFFICrAL RECORD�
l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department and date stamped August 25, 1993, Sheets
1 through 4;
2. that condition #2 of the City Engineer's memo dated August 30,
1993 shall be met; and
3. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform
Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of
Burlingame.
c�
w
in
csa
.c�
w
i ��
� • /�/� ,
�-----.
CITY OF B URLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT
Special Permit for Roof Height of Accessory Structure
Item 4�6
Address: 1436 Bernal Avenue Meetinq Date: 9/13/93
Request: Special Permit to construct a new 500 SF detached garage
which would be 14' high at 3" from the rear property line where
10'-3" is the maximum height allowed (CS 25.60.010-(h)).
Applicant/Property Owner: Ann Marie Flores & Viktor T. Pochran
Lot Dimensions and Area: 6,000 SF APN:026-043-120
General Plan: Low Density
Zoninq: R-1 Single Family Residential
Adjacent Development: single family residential
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 -
New construction or conversion of small structures Class 3(e),
accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages.
Summarv•
Applicant is requesting a special permit to build a 500 SF detached
garage. The existing 360 SF garage would be removed and replaced
with a garage located 3" from the rear property line (existing
garage has 4'-7" rear setback). The zoning code allows a 10'-0"
maximum accessory structure roof height at the property line and
allows a 1' increase for every 1' the structure is located away
from the property line, to a maximum of 14'.
There are no proposed improvements to the existing two bedroom
residence; therefore the second covered parking space provided in
this structure is not required parking.
Front Setback:
Left Setback:
Right Setback:
Rear Setback:
Lot Coverage:
Parking:
Declining Height:
Accessory
Structure
Heiqht:
Hillside A.C.P.
Fences/Hedges:
Trees:
MINIMUM/
REOIIIRED
15' or average
0'-0"
0'-0"
0'-0"
40� (2400)
2 spaces,
1 must be
covered
n/a
* 10'-3" @
3" from
property line
n/a
n/a
n/a
EXISTING
±18'-0"
+27'-6"
+2'-10"
+4'-7"
33.5$ (2007)
2 spaces,
substandard
covered
n/a
not
avail-
able
n/a
n/a
n/a
PROPOSED
no change
25'-0"
2'-0"
0'-0"
35.8% (2147)
2 spaces,
covered,
to code
n/a
14'
n/a
no changes
none to be
removed
This project meets all other code requirements. This project does
not trigger floor area ratio requirements.
SPECIAL PBRIYIT 1436 BernaZ Avenue
Staff Comments:
The City Engineer noted the distance between the house and the
accessory structure is not shown and that it scales at 22'.
Planning staff notes the proposed structure would be located ±25'
from the existing residence (the 22' dimension was scaled to a
proposed addition to the house which the applicant has decided not
to build). The Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal had no
comments.
Required Findinqs for a Special Permit:
In order to grant a Special Permit the Planning Commission must
find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code
Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in
accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of
this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions
or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes
of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner
compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the
general vicinity.
Planninq Commission Action:
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following
conditions should be considered:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped August
25, 1993, sheets 1 through 4;
2. that condition #2 of the City Engineer's memo dated August 30,
1993 shall be met; and
3. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City
of Burlingame.
' �� `/l"� C�
����/ �
Sheri Saisi
Zoning Technician
cc: Ann Marie Flores and Viktor T. Pochran, property owners
Dave Howell, designer
2
�o� or� ��a���r�
° ° ° ���° ���� �� �'�'�i � ° ° ���� �� l�V �������]
Tvve of AQv/ication: ,�Special Permit Variance Other
Project Address� �i�� l�ernal �ven�ie�
Assessor's Parcel Numberls) v�l� - D�I-3 - i z�o �
APPL/CANT
� Name: 1%i k+�r "� �oChrorJ
Address: I�--�i� �erna I r4venu�, _
City/State2ip: P��r►�,���am,�. ��'r �l�}oia
Telephone:(work) - rYw�a� .n 3���3�93
Ihome) 3�-1•3�3 li:/,�1it.3:ct�pN,
ARCH/TECT/DES/GNER
Name: Pyn�ns�u,(a �,ra-�(��ra ,Serd�ev
Address: 2`d Z�'' � i Ilsi�e, pr�ve�
City/State/Zip: �3u� 1� r�ia r►� C� q�}-D � o
Telephone (daytime): hn v�r�+ ccmfac.�-
R PERTY WNE � I� r�
Name: �h���ar��e.� ,� ��kfo��rPochr��i
Address: l'-i��(� 1�ern�al �ven��Pi
City/StateRip:i�. u�l�✓ra�vn� ��" ��I-Ulv
�
Telephone: (work) �17�-- I o �-; �
Ihomel sa�
Please indicate with an asterisk f`I who the contact nerson
is for this nroiect.
/ I / � /. ._ �.�i�:�•��SGS�...::� ��^��riori�ii�GiL����u
--u: /� [I /
AFF/DA V/T/S/GNA TURE:
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and beli f
�
' I �
Applicant's Signature Da e
I know about the proposed application nd her y authorize the above applicant to submit this
application ��.�,�� . �� � 2 I�
f �
i
Property Owner's ignature Da e
--------------------------------------------------OFFICE USE ONLY -----------------------------------------------------
Date Filed: �� G-� � C 3 Fee � Receipt # r�..Tl �� v�'�'G�
Letterls) to applicant advising application incomplete: �
Date application accepted as com lete: '�' `Z � '
P.C. study meeting (date) � P C. public hearing (date)
P.C. Action ��/J vU �'d �'�'Ji �'� d�S�
,s�as Appeal to Council? Yes No
��;�.f.�„ Council meeting date
Council Action
' �r� ciTr o�
BURLliVGAME �0�� �� ��OU�OU`Yl�lrVOH�U� iS,T+`'�Y""��u'�F-�"�;� I::�:�C�
i� � �r�r��u�a� r����uu� �r�r�o���o���
�.- �--
�-;�;� �g
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City�s ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions wili r„�}�i�- �t��;_�I�j�rg
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made f8�.��te�;�t.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or, infurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
_ Thv pro��vsed ar�.� ; s s�r✓i��y a. ►'e�laeerr�ern.-t o-f an e�.i s�►hc�
�n2 y�9�-�► no 'fu�'�r im�uG�. S�r►�e our Yle�c�L�bar —tU -�e rear', vn -%l�.e._
r
o-K��' S�de o-f -f� ea5c���n�rvr�, is �+ a r►�u.c�� h��h.elt. Jcrac�e� Gtnd has rti.
Yna�� rru,�rn s� w c�ar�� o���o-s� � ours ,-I'b��s �fr�c+u�� �1� I � s-}i I I no-I- b�
�;5'� bl.e� `�v �{'�. m • �
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accoidance with the Bur/ingame
Genera/ P/an and Zoning O�dinanceT
'Th�S i5 -���I� d con-(�rm�r�� �ardc�u Wi�lM oT,�h, reyvQ�- �
�irn���-(Jin�l) �!'� roo-f� I;�(e�, T-I- v�l+ll be� 1.e.5s c-y-�pev�5�fe� -�'o b.u�Id , mo✓e�
�es•+�h�--��ca11y ��eas�nc� �nd Com��afible, W��W► rnan. hvrne�. By remov��J �I'l�
h ��, and Q�fe v►�� r�� -1�- �a b I� , i+ e�- cee�c( s-Yhe� I �` h� �5 v►f ma� -Fo r a-FQ �0
�Qe+' ov► I� .
3. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character
of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinity7
:�I-FG�au��, na-f� �/erv� Yis�bte.� -From -�l�e.. 5�-ree�-. �Y��5 reb�iid w��� be�
�omplQ7Cc.ly Com��a+ibl.e� Gnd a b5 irn�rovem.cmf -�Yom a d.�.o�r�yl st�nc��oivt�
��Oair, i-� �i5 JJ5-t � Cvn-Formin� Z L�r �av��v,
� sre2
sp.frm
1. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the p/oposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or injurious to
property oi Improvements in the vicinity or to pub/ic hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or
convenience.
How will the proposed structure o� use within the structure affect nei�hborinp properties or structures on those
properties7 If neighborin� properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, liphting, paving,
landscapin� sunlipht/shade, views from neiphborin� properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare?
Public hea/th includes such thinfls as sanitation (Garba�e), air quality, discharpes into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and thinys which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks,
storape of chemicals, situations which encourape the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire p�otection? wll alarm systems
or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need fo� police services
(i.e., noise, unruly patherings, loite�ing, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use flammable or hazardous materials,
or potentially danperous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
Geneial we/fare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and
goals for conservation and development7 Is there a social benefit?
�onvenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parkinp for
this site or adjacent sitesl7 Is the proposal accessible to particula� seflments of the public such as the elderly or
handicappedt
2. How wi// the proposed use be /ocated and conducted in accordance with the Bur/ingame Genera/
P/an and Zoning OrdinanceT
Ask the Planninp Department for the �eneral plan desi�nation and zonin� district for the proposed project site. Also
ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated
designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" accordingly.
3. Ho w wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character of the
existing neighborhood and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityl
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existin� neighborhood7 If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. If chan�es to the structu�e are proposed, was the addition desipned to match existinp
architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood7 If a use will affect the way a
neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area
and explain why it "fits".
How does the proposed structure compare to nei�hborinfl structu�es in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no chan�e
to structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other
structures in the neiphborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neiphborhoodl Think of character as
the imape or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more
traffic o� less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change,
state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existinp a�d potential uses in the peneral vicinity7 Compare your
p�oject v�rith existin� uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state
why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
tsrez
.p.r.m
������!��-�,
r'�� �` � �:� 1993
�,ap-i s ,..�. _.. �, . .-a�'Y�k:
�������� ����.
Tv-f'�, �Iqnn�►�r� �ornmi55�on -
��
�� z�, � � f �
��SUrdin� o�h, rel�.��d of a �ef�l�.e.chQcl �ardJv.
�(v�J ha�u a�p112c� �U� -���5 5�e��al ��2rrn�� �OJr�S�uan'i" �"v
��:
Cha�-�er Z�(�� � Z�fc(�.bIC�Ch�S�cial �erm�� ►�����/em.�l�"S. C�U� arc;l���ec.-�'"
h ad -fo ���s � e, ha�4 n o a�i"�ons o n-�h� �.esi� �► �-f -1�1e � a ra�C ��-{-
�'(�- �ear o-� -� �vo�er�y .-1'�e- Yva-F a b�l�-f-e� y had -�o i�nc:l�d� a
h� ��o k.ee,P -Y(�e.. h.e �� 6�' -Ev 1 U'. -�►�s des��� Un-�orf�na feJy i n�i.c,tc�s
a n o� nhoc�i r►� i� iOr '�5�` •
J
�� �m �nt.er�iew�nc� b��Id�,rs, �I'(�,� cvnf✓a��ar w� c�.ec�d��, a-,�l
Was c�rre�( �(�.uildin� a d,kfacl�a �ara�e� on Cor+ez� �t�,�f sfr�c�ur�
�tanol5 vJi� a r�o� �a bl� �}' I�}-� pnl� inche5 �Yom i�- Ye�r ��r'e�er-��
l�n.e- • O�r �orrt�ac�-o►� Sa;d h�. had also ,�ec�n-h y b;d on ahvl�r
�ara�Cv ;n ��s a�ea , �Ca�t-� �d��-��un. , ��af �Iso h�d -� ✓oo� �abl.e�
�ya; n a� I�--� on -l'h e� � �o�e ff y 1 � n�v•
On h�s ��icc We� S��bm��ecl Ye✓;5e.cf bJ�eprin-�s no�' �eali�i,u�
orl S�QCbI) �2�(1'»r'C II�o75 %QC�t1�(Z� •
/
Ple-ase� Ga►rs���' our Y� � �es-� �o,� -k�� s,mofe Com��-1- i b �� d�i��L
� Y�"� v csr,t.,
/�► . J -
(.������ i
� �_,;r. .7 �
f- S� -,�5 �¢►� SheYr� ,�G�S� �e�itneed cop;e5 eYF our �,��.e�pr,r�s a�e� on i� ��°�C�s
z
-�(�, y ar� 3 sc�l,�.
°7- I � — �t7' ��
�'� .� �� �� �� S�- 2'� Z�_ i t��
x r
N �
�' l i
� b . :J
� - -
� �
c� s ' ^',c�
, LIJirIG� J`OUry�. l� 1 -
`� � �
_ O►- -. �
_, 1� _
� I
_ __ _ I
i . _ � i
� � � �' � r% / lo I
� � � •;
� � �
�— i . � S��.S " r � ,�
J� � �,, � . w 13 - 9 i
� � - {
� . I W .
, -
i I ` � . N
� �
� i
� i��e l� r�,:, ,�' �
� i , N . � , c:
; �or�,l� t? '/ E'-4" , ; :
� � —
O w
' � ��
I �' ` � �
i
•
� � ��n'�i(�M. Lf/_���n 9/„� a O.
I � r L" � V � W
- ------•--- � i
i � ' ' .. 1 "Q
1 � � j � O' �' i. �� ,--� .�"
1 Y _ �1 � J" f �
N
� �J
��� � �
a U , b S�-lo" � 3�Y 7� ;
` � �i �ry w �
�re� ia ��' _ -,� � ,
�
q'_o" lB�—o" �3!. q��
,:
_
��� �
r � �` i
� � Q •
�'C;t'hr_h/_:1 � �X��,r��r� j, �
�
' q�p„ � �
o.
� ,
1� �
: � ����}y ' �
� � ------ � . ;
� : - -, _ ;
, , . ,
: �
h ' �, 4�s£ - � -____. .. ....,..� �
i � �� �
, ; �!x � ��
'——--1 4
�I
ROUTING FORM
DATE: � ��
TO : j/�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�
AT
CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL �
PARRS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR
d.
� j
SCHEDULED PLANNING
REVIEWED BY STAFF
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
�� , ����� �I�
/f %%� � ����>�'-�-�1 ��
�
' % y .'C c� ��Z��'t--t�� �i�l �'"�F'�' ' �
/�!'� �
Date of Comments
G�l l��� 'y� � '
/ /%�� ��� C� ��� ����r
� � � /���� ���' a��� w
a.� � __ � ����°
�� � ��
� ������� �.
. ��1��.�
�
. � � � ��.��
n�� ��� � � ���
��- � ., �
�� ���
COMMISSION..,AC'�AAT MEETING: S �
IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �
- � > �-.-�-� �r� �
�
' �
�2.�'�� /�. ����� </�,�.,` �� � ��- , -
��-�c � �� -
.,� ���z�
��i�� `�����
� ',
;
/ .
/� � �
� i�'G,���, -
ROUTING FORM
DATE: � �� '
TO: CITY ENGINEER
� CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�
AT
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR
��
�, �
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION..��;'='z��T MEETING: S �
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
� 3� Date of Comments
�% D C tr^^+.►+1 �it,�-f �
�-
0
z,
�
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�
AT
� ��
CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BIIILDING INSPECTOR
i FIRE MARSiiAL
PARRS DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIAN
REQIIEST FOR � G�,w � ���%j"� �..�`"
�
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION--�1C�A�+1 MEETING: S �
REVIEWED BY STAFF IN MEETING ON MONDAY: �
THANKS,
Jane/Sheri/Leah
IV � ���"`�- IN ,
D�Z-� Date of Comments
� �i.1.� ! ,' � �
�
� 4��v ��� � �, 9n.� �`' V�i;.` � r,� � .. �T".
.... � .
� I r
P`J � ����. �
� � " {X l � m " &
�.
t� dL �1 R . .v
� ��� \
�'e ;. �' . ��� �.N"O. �. � �.. 4 ���.
.
�F � � � _
�+`� � �$��� � � � `� _ .x .M
P ,.
, P �
� � �� 7� m � _ — �•�.r.
� .
. ; -, s. , `P - . ,-. �� , ` 7. -
:
" ' � . � . a , '� .
. — .•
� • � � ,� -,. �
.
— i^'f — •�� �§•
� - . ..��� ».r. � ,
I � '�^. — � � F�� '�� i ��,� �F
� . . - . � � � � 4 +�� �. � �' .._ . . � ��.. n b,.. �
� -�4-
" � h,
� �p •
� � �
� � ���`.
^�. Gg .�>.l �f
'S%� a'
�� �
_ _��, y.m
. _s ,,� . �.... ,..,
� — � ��
�� � �
'<
�,',,:` , , � ;` �r, ''" � ,� � � Y � �;
�
.. —
s
�- � � �� r. � 1 ° � � ' ,� ��
.
� � � �� � : � � �- � ���.� � � �
' _ ✓ � `
� �_ � : .
� ° u-,� ��� � ��'i .��
,:
. � .� � � �
_
.
:
� . � . �- : u �
. ;�
q
. ,
, "�
�, , r,
F�v,
;
� �
�, "� �:�' � ' "� ` :
��
, ��
� , �� . � ��.. � � � II�' �� �, � � � � �
- � , w
. Q �
_ :: � �� t �
- �_ - � � _ , �x� � � —
�' � '� ,,
t � ! � r�� ".� � q
�� ,�, , . �
�, :�. ,�
• � � � � �,�,� ';� ; ���,��
1 �j - ""y�.� t �`=...1 � �`.,� .`' Yr.yo* A µ�t
.r-ba 3" �.,,� � �'^ t
� � ` '��; � ��. ` �
_ � 6 , ��
�, { �-
%`k � +�4�� f_ '.
�i. .� �.�,% �: . kak, , � � � . `,` \/
R } � � � F ' T� u� ��V
. „ ,.. n
,.
� . ..
,`
, �'��;� ` rt � �gM , � , r�
,
, �
_ � , � .y : - h .. � ,r�. .;�
� �
.. v-� � . g r.� ,_ 5+��. ,:
'
�
i ; ..,� . ., ... - . �
E � � �
.'�"�� . � �l 5 � �� '+, � -* � - � ��%► � * l� � � � �4
�' � � *' �� �
rw � - \ .�/ � �., �
�°` , � . ,.
�. � .. �� ; , : En
< . . �_ � „ �� � . � ,�, �
* ,� �� ..; ; -` . , .s� � ��r
� _i
� �
�'��" � � � � ��`?� ��� � � � -
: �
,
� �.: _
4�p�. „� � �� � �-
c
,,
1 . � . �C .�' .
�
M' # �
i
� �
� i ..
� � � ... � •> �
ry,,y �, s� .� ' '�
� � � � k � ��� y � -. �.
�
,� `
�-,�r . . , �, _
, �.
r *
K
.
. ., j � • ��� y � �
3 5���:
.�
� . ,. J .��g� � yi� k J �
� �� �� Tx `:� � x � '1,��� �_ .� �Y ��� .:�J
� � ' ' . > . �s � i � I , . � � . tl
� �
. .. , .^� ' _ : -... �
� � � xu ��a � t ..k�.
,_ � . .. , . � �' � . '
.
.
� .,� � � � ;;
e
� �
; ,
, ���,, .
� t .
� y �� � � � :�� ,
�� � � ����� � ��� �� P
� ` . r ��.-' t . ,,
� � � ';� '�,i�� _ �, � � 6 S ��r � F �`� �w
� # � � �p, � ti , .,,
��. ,f Y�� .� �1 �~ � .r � �_ 5 �
� �r�� S`.'� „ ' ° y r1 � >
�
,
� a. _
�' �"
,.- . . , .
. � � . : ����_
� � �� �� ; .r
� � . .� � � �
t
, S � ' �. � . z4 . .
„� r- „ . , � ..
�
: . � . . ..: . ,,.' y �, _
. -� k # , ti� � �
t 4 �,�
e:
} _ .
4 ( . 'f
t j
t � . t � . ���� u . �'� � �� �, `�^. � 4i� /
� � � � � � A . V� .� �` � ��,' � .(„ � !M"-"
,� � �
. , .
, � �.— �..� �� ,�
�� �. � �'"�"`�'� ` . = �� � '� �� r �'� � � ��'�A ��'
. �
,;
. _
�
' k' N
.
.
r, 4 Y
'� � .. . � . �fi a � '+k�t..a���i
y , ,
�. . ; � , �..:. .f Y ; " YY"'E r
..
a , . -. _k x• � -
., -- 4 . � A ,�'
i _ . n' � ! '�'�a�
k ' _� ".� i::•� �
_� :.- _, - ' , . , � : .
A^- . ' ,.. .. ': ..
� . �,:. � F�.� 4+ � � ,A' -
� ' '
- � % �.. 1 „q . ' „ �,
�.
� ..
: . r'r k o -" �-.. .
,
,
.._�tiS . ,�. .. ..�.at , x " '- - �
',;
�
-s . ... u., .
`-� . �. .� ��. . . .
x �
.. ..... . . ... . �.; ` .-,,,, � . . �� � , � _ '�3:_. .r ' � .
CITY OF BIIRLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BIIRLINGAD�E, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BIIRLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the
following public hearing on Monday, the 13th day of September,
1993, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application
and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning
Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
1436 BERNAL AVENITE
APN: 026-043-120
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT OF AN
ACCESSORY STRIICTIIRE ON REAR PROPERTY LINE AT 1436 BERNAL
AVENUE, ZONED R-1.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in the notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public
hearing.
Please note, when possible, and when multiple family development is
involved, this notice shall be posted in a public place on the
project site and on neiqhborinq buildinqs with tenants.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
September 3, 1993
• , '�►
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application
has been made for a special permit for roof height of an accessory
structure on rear property line at 1436 Bernal Avenue (APN 026-
043-120); 1Aropertv owner: Ann Marie Flores/Viktor T Pochron 1436
Bernal Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 l; and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the
City of Burlingame on September 13, 1993 , at which time it reviewed
and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning
Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted
and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it
is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project
set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a
categorical exemption, Sec. 15303, New construction or conversion of
small structures Class 3(e), is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set
forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such special pertnit
are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution
be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, , Secretary of the Planning
Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of September ,
1993 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
City of Burlingame Plan Review Process Building Department
8-12 AM, 1-2 PM 696-1600
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 342-8625
PAGE: Z- �
<si�>
Job Address: �o Y'i'J�'� Application Number: %3�/O,�
Job Description:_ tiVt) ��G G�C�i� 2 c,GI{�- Gjq�-QG,e
v �
� Hi���I�Si�'e �lr�_ov�.sfr��� �i � ��� r�6f g�.�I�ca�-/c.
� ��� r�ss l��a'�'�s . -' �l� �i ah��-s �r� �os-��'
T�«S -
�������',
_ ��� ' %� �.S �O � 5�6��5 �� l�C��Y7 � ,�YD�OS�G�
�ra��i�.e , f-l�i GIh t o{� acc� ss �� s�r�rc�,�� wc�
1-ri�5l�rv- /.�' o rr� Co�-� �� s � s����c f��` �;
���ic�r� P� sf�r���I' l'o v�� j��i �h�) 1� � w�ts tvld l��
-�I�tr���hG� �J � - -f7��S � t�vrs ho a IiG�. �'�'aGt'�
�/crS �►'-e f�rvr» 1��d ,!/S�G'�� G lso 1���� 1�,��--�
�� ►n�, o�c , , �.� .' /� rn� ,^ � �, ., � )., -i- .�' i., i� // � � i.-�. �o
i�,l„,�/ ,,�,
�` t 4'- 3°— lsc l�'� -� i� d�av�Gl' � s � �as r��/
_ 6rn �sfY1.�Gfi�� �'�YIeY'S ; �� �7��G ,l�liGvi Y'�� ' _
�
, ,
J
; , �
�
�
G11 /Dl�ri�G�' h�G
' -- /O �
►' !�
=� , --� �
�YlG1lY�G'i
��-l'n1%�G�- ,�
,
������s �
,� �5 �`
� � ,�,
�%� c3� CE
� �P `
��"S �� .
h�� r�� /�
►�si:�
,� �
. -i i
i . �i
:�-� �
�
�- �
,�
City of Burlingame Plan Review Process Building Department
8-12 AM, 7-5 PM (�cjb ? 5'� 696-7600
PLANNING DEPARTMENT �,.� �
Plan Review Comments - <B,�>
Job Address: ���i(a /"?-��(LnlAj-c./ Application Number: � �6
Job Description: . � Se� G�
Appl'n Date: ro 8 .....Check Date• � ..By:S S�/S-� [] Not A pd
Resubi Date : � � I ���7 . . . Recheckl Date : � • I l � , , , g � ,�� '
Y'.-� Not Appd
Resub2 Date: ..Recheck2 Date: ..By: [ Not Appd
Resub3 Date: ...Recheck3 Date: ...By: [] Not Appd
NOTE: When Plans are APPROVED check the Plans Approved box below and sign.
�lans approved: ,[�Without further comment ] Wi h conditions listed.
By:_ S�l�lrl SG�ISI Date: (a' � /'Jb�
�a�a�vPe 8=�/-9.3
Lot: JO Block: �� Subd:�RS� �c�- �irr� /L�• � ��l �4���'
APN: l���v '�r-�''3 — f 2.(5 Use Zone: ,e _' �
Owner Verified:
Planning Files:
-�'f c�-�� �- / C ') /t� y � , f �� i, � �
w
Bldg Dept Files: � ( ��
� �iS� -
�-�'
� �`�
-- �=e� �� ���� � sUr�� � .� , -
,
�
,
�
�
�
��
� lo% C' C�v�i
- ��o�
�° ` �
2 /��
r�� - r�ot �
-�
- se� � �
� __ 4
: :.
�
► ► For each chang : '�d
�12�(o7f
f�C�' ,��-y�
�.� / o%
i
Citv of Burlin�ame
8-1 Z AM, 1-5 PM
Plan Review Process
PLANNING DEPARTMENT �'� �S°
Plan Review Comments
�
Job Address: �-! �lo �,�(Z,nl i�C/ Application Number: � D6
Job Description: . � • Se� C�
Appl' n Date : � 8 . . . . . Check Date • � • � . . By : S� �: �i'- 1 [, ] Not A d
Resubl Date: I- ..Rechecki Date: ����� ..By:S•�'(�(c5� Not Appd
.
Resub2 Date: ..Recheck2 Date: ..By: [ Not Appd
Resub3 Date: ..Recheck3 Date: ..By: [] Not Appd
NOTE: When Plans are APPROVED check the Plans Approved box below and sign.
,�Without
conditions
�ot: 3D Bio�k: �� Subd: �as� A-�a! .�/._ /�c�• � /�s�r �-l�� U'�' �/%�9'3
APN:_��� -�,�3 � f 26 Use Zone: ���
Owner Verified: �[�r� i�ctr'r r, �cr�-c� �
Planning Files: Bldg Dept Files: '� ( 2e�F
Z �� --
c � � �—�'
� � �. �/%��.�-�- - Y�a � � T -=-��'� - �', � � ��- � h� 5
� ���
1 h�' �� Y�, �� �-, r�
�
f
�
�--r;
� a `>> .�-f-�-i,iC �vir � ,
�. �a,,. ,�,-, �.
l � �f ��°v- �: l��f l
2 / ¢�
- � �f �
` - se� � (
�,� / o%
��n' ; ��� �
�✓7 � � _/-.,t�_�f�Qrn S
Building Department
696-1600
<ai�>
.��- _ . - ' : , ,
i�%GC�jf��(r��ls'"?,.!' ��Clr"�?� - i?of G��f1f!l'./+'r�!,r'
�a
m� r��'c ��� f-,-� �
► For each c ang :'�d � iv sio �on original sheet & prov
��2.��0%f �4,(e�-f' �4,(0%-� ��� _
� seej�Z
�4�fv
CQ�'{�l,c'lrS f� -f� ,r/' '% i %f .✓ (�`�, ���-��JC_._-
a revision m rker at each clou and in revision bloal�`with date...
/� , de 2� s�e r��re �r �, Z
�
1� P/'lY ' �� C� J �%�('l i'1�,-C'r' ' i I ��'' ,
p ✓ ��
Y(,� �/i � ��� /�� -= �rr-���✓l
� %Y1 G�C �'/il � / LI P l ��ii fi l'l�l �l < 1.�1 !�
City of Burlingame Plan Review Process Building Department
8-12 AM; 1-�2 PM 696-1600
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 342-8625
PAGE: Z-
<s��>
Job Address:1��o �%�'1�Y1�/%' � Application Number: G%3a/��%
Job Description: �iVtJ ��fGr�h�G� 2 C'GIl� G1Gj;�GI�G
� Hi�,liSi�ile �r��o�.sfr��� �i �rl-� ��r1-Yrif �of GI��I��a�/�.
� ��'f') r'C�S ����f�:� ,' �� �%7/.�l�l�c�-s �i'�-� �05-�Gi �
�
�
YY�
�l�
w,
�.� lO -s� �.S c� ��C�= i� o� Y�
�'I t aC'�'� 55 � ��'V�t ��.. 1�VG�
Gc� �` � !�' �- `
- s f� ���' �o ��� h a �` h r-��s tv l�
lti�j iGl� i n �fy)��<
� 1 �'- 3'' - �5�� l�
—
�YD�'YJ �SfYI� G��
�� �� Y�l ��` �
�
^�.�ssnr
�gn�� n�
��GfS'
�
���
'�
L�--�l
�
�
G
> o G� I/ � l�G.�Ga'z
, G'�/� G+' lso �1�� %
,� ;� � wa /l �
- �'�/�r��1�3' r�S�.,/f r !� l-���/f�
� Y �� �
e ��-Y� i r2�'G�, n'j
G1����1e.s ,
� 1"s l � ,�-, � , v�� /i
�� � ��� �
q / ov7r�G' �� � h
; -- /�' �'''���C
�C��"G/ — Y'��,�-��
7� oYi�1 �v�G / ���
�
�s�G/
I�
�
�
r.i�.s�
// ' �
,��
, . �.
rP�`,�� p / �
����/' ,r�rmi,
r�� r� ���
OY
, r-
,