The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1529 Howard Avenue - Staff Report (2)_ :� i „'' =` I �� ` � — — � •-----�.a —�_ ? _ � �— � —= — _ — r ., ,� ':ia ` . '� :1 . . _ . `' — —� � ' � Y � I'. I . �:. _ __ �. _ � � _ ; . �. . . , � , , � . _ - - _ � � �� .. _ ; � �� . � e�� , ��; r - �. , ' � _ -- �r`� _ � _ . . ;, �,� � •S, � a,.= uy�' � _ . � '.r?'- . - .. . ,�,�._. ,o,� . - :_ .��"- ,... .,. .- . �-� , ..� . . � ..:. -�:- . . ..- . . . _... ,.. .. �...... .. ._- . ..=.. _ -- _ _..::> •$.�:._...�� . >.._;;,,:i,,,r,.. �.�_ � . �_. ,;— - . _��.rriii � � _. - . ,. . ""...� rm�.>..�..- _ . �. �_ __. .� . _ , _ � '�. '� # z "",. � "«� � s: . .. _.. ,�...r•k',�,�.a+, ,� � - ,_;_ a�t..a.y:a�.c .. .. ,....:. ..,�_ . � ,�;- � + r +^- ,�.... „wo � . :"r`"' �<??&.'E . .-,,,� �-'. � . -. =- pab .. � ..,. �� . .,... ' . _ . .. .,. ' ._ ...,_ti. � � � . . ��,. . .•sa.. . ., :� ..�... ,- . .... . .� . .. "� .+s;,� av . . .. . .: .. ,:., , �,,., .. , . . .. - � -. . . ...�iEi+?S.Skiutw.-_;...; , . . �:.--: ,;. . . � ��. _cvaviw�:. . .. _ " .,:,..: ..:^_ ..�_.. � s ... ..._- � <�e � , � ': _� � � i %'s�'�� i �•, � F'� � � � �� 4, . Item No. 9 City of Burlingame Design ReviewStudy Environmenfal Scoping, Design Review, and Special Permit Address: 1529 Howard Avenue Meeting Date: March 24, 2014 Request: Application for Environmental Scoping, Special Permit for Basement Ceiling Height, and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Randy Grange, TRG Architects Property Owners: John and Cherie McGee General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 028-292-210 Lot Area: 8,904 SF Zoning: R-1 Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park No. 2 subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated September 5, 2013. The results of the evaluation concluded that 1529 Howard Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National or California Registers under any criteria. Planning Staff will prepare environmental review documentation to support the findings of the Historic Resource Evaluation prior to the Planning Commission Action Hearing for this project. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing two-story house and garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 4,249 SF (0.47 FAR) where 4,349 SF (0.49 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch and basement exemptions). The proposed project is 100 SF below the maximum allowed FAR and is therefore within 2% of the maximum allowed FAR. The applicant is proposing to remove a protected-size Magnolia tree on the property in order to accommodate the proposed project. The tree is located immediately behind the existing garage, at the rear of the property. The applicant has submitted an arborist report for the Magnolia, dated February 18, 2014. The Parks Supervisor has indicated in his March 5, 2014 memo that the applicant must submit a separate Protected Tree Removal Permit to the Parks Division. This Permit must be approved prior to any demolition work on the site. The proposed two-story house will have a 621 SF basement. The applicant is requesting a special permit for a basement ceiling height of greater than 6'-6", where the proposed basement ceiling height is 9'-0". The top of the finished floor above the basement is less than two (2) feet above existing grade and therefore, the basement floor area exemption applies to this space. A total of 600 SF (the maximum allowable exemption) has been deducted from the FAR calculation. The proposed detached garage provides two code-compliant covered parking spaces for the proposed six- bedroom house (three off-street parking spaces are required for a six-bedroom house, two of which must be covered). There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Environmental Scoping for Negative Declaration, a determination that there are no significant environmental effects as a result of this project; ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010 (a) (1)); and ■ Special Permit for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6" (CS 25.26.035 (fl). Environmental Scoping, Design Review, and Special Permit 1529 Howard Avenue 1529 Howard Avenue Lot Area: 8,904 SF Plans date stam ed: Februa 18, 2014 ; PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ; i --...__........._.......--------- _.._...._._.,._.._ .............._ ............_ ----.....__....._._....................__.............._...._..........._.........._ ._........................_...__.._. _.._.;..._...............................__........_.._......__.__ _.._ ..._..................._........_ _..........._._..._................. .................................._ Froni (1st flr): ; 24'-11" i 23'-11" is the block average � 23'-11 " (2nd flr): ; 23'11" � Side (left): ; 5'-6" j 4'-0" (righf): 9'-6" 4'-0" _......---..__...------......._......-----._..;_...---._.._._.._ ....................._.........___—.....-- --��-...................................---...._._....__._.._.............,..._..........---.._..._ Rear (1st flr): I 80 -6 � 15'-0" (2nd flr): i 89'-0" ' 20'-0" Lot Coverage: ; 2470 SF 3562 SF � ' 30% 40% _._.._._......_._.......__..._...----..._ .......:............_....__.....__..__._..........__....._...............-------.........__.__ ...................._....__......_.._.._... .----�.._..... . FAR: ' 4249 SF 4349 SF' � 0.47 FAR 0.49 FAR _._._.—.._._..__..._._.._.._�.._......__......._.__ .................................._..._._..__........................._....__........__....._........__...._._...._. __.........._._._;........_........__._........_...._........__.._...._.._........_..__........_......._..........._...._................_........_._.........._.........._._.__............ # of bedrooms: 6 --- _ ........................._..._............._.__.._ _._.—._._.......:._ Basement: ; 621 SF basement with a ceiling height ' Special Permit required per C.S. greater than 6'-6" 25.26.035,f 2 _ _..--- ----- ...................................r........._.. ..._.__.._._......................._...... .........----....._.....__.._........._....._.._...__......_......----._....__ ....._..............;......... _...._.__...__......_._.__.._.._.._............._..........._._.._.._.._....__..........__..._ . ......... ...._..............__.......----...-- Parking: � 2 covered, detached ; 2 covered, detached (20' x 20') (20' x 20') 1 uncovered ! 1 uncovered i (9' x 20') � (9' x 20') -----._._.—.._.........-- g ----:-......__._._....._._...----......._...._...._ _...._.._._ _. ---............._..... __..__..._..........__ ._._.._.._;..----.........._ .......................---- ---- ._..._. ____ --------....._......_.............._._....._ i Hei ht: ; 26'-3 1/8" 30'-0" DH Envelope: ` --- ; complies : � ' (0.32 x 8904 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 4349 SF (0.49 FAR) 2 Special Permit requested for a basement ceiling height that is greater than 6'-6". Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Division, Engineering Division, Parks Division, and Stormwater Division. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, applicant Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Form Arborist's Report, date stamped February 18, 2014 Staff Comments Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 14, 2014 Aerial Photo 6�� _ —'"�- J) BIJRLIIVS'iAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlir�9ame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: � Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: /� Z � � Please indicate the contact person for this project / APPLICANT project contact person l�' i�' OK to send electronic copies of documents � Name: / l� f�/��i/��CTS Address: _�.� f�G��'k �.�1. �� City/State/Zip: �U,��r �qG h� �2 � C�I 9 Yo l� Phone:�54 � .S��y' - ��6 Z Fax: � 5� ' .� �G% � �%�J E-mail: ,S � T � � �,G�I/� ARCHITECT/DESIGNE Project contact Person ❑ OK to send eJectronic copies of documents ❑ Name: Address: � � City/State/Zip: PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to se�d electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: �o �� ei•l lV l C�x -� Address: Z � � City/State/Zip: c� r'�1--� �cl� Phone: � " � 9 � — � Fax: E-mail: Jz � � llri/' C. ��( . � � � c� � �� Phone: b �� % ' / � ��0 2 � Fax: � �D ' � � �l ' �l �.� E-mail: �G�L S ,�� YG� Ct' ✓�� - �'l�� v * Burlingame Business License #: � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �/� Z � 1x�1 /.� � ,D�,._ ._ - .. �S-e W ��N J /� �T� !�l �O( ��Gt � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I h reb ertify u ena y o erjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beli . — ApplicanYs signature: 'Date: � / 3 � I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit his application to the Plannin Commission. . 9 G Property owner's signature: Date: � I G� � �' �� Date submitted: �"" ""� Z �k Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license w�� be r'�q�1i� e� by�t#ie Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�Hando�s�piC�,ppTi�orif�QDg��,andout � CDD-P! �NNI(�1G �;V. ' City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org �r� c �r r oR. 6URLINGAME �. �� el ep CITY OF BURLINGAlVIE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of rnass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish rreaterials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain Izow the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is Hecessary and is consistent wit/a the city's reforestation requirements. Wlaat mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain wlay this mitigation is appropriate. SPECPERM.FRM City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlin�ame.ore 1. Explain wlzy the blend of mass, scale and dominant structut-al characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent witlz tlze existing structure's design and with the existing street and neiglzborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. Z. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character ofthe neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with tlze residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adj acent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structura] components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 1 I.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say sa SPECPERM.FRM Attachment A SPECIAL PERMIT BASEMENT WITH CEILING HE�IGHT GREATER THAN 6'-6" 1529 Howard Avenue The mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction are consistent with the existing street and neighborhood. There are a wide variety of houses on the street (in terms of style, mass, scale etc...) and the proposed Craftsman style fits in nicely. The proposed basement has no impact on the mass or scale of the structure. 2. The rooflines, farade, materials, and elevations of the proposal are similar to that of other houses in the neighborhood. Wood shingles, painted wood trim, stone veneer etc.... The roofline is varied and the fa�ade includes many architectural details to enrich its character. The basement is not visible from the street, and does not contribute to the rooflines, materials etc... 3. 1. The architectural style is compatible with the character of the neighborhood. 2. The detached garage is the same as the existing pattern, and consistent with the neighborhood. 3. See items 1 and 2 above for comments about style, mass and bulk. 4. A full landscaping plan is being provided, which will be a significant improvement for the site. 4. No trees within the footprint of the structure will be removed for this project. One tree behind the house will be removed, and one street tree will be removed and replaced. Please see the landscaping plan for additional details and new trees. Kielty Arborist Services Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650- 525-1464 February 18, 2014 Mr. Michael Callan 1233 Oak Street San Mateo, CA 94402 Site: 1529 Howard, Burlingame, CA Dear Mr. Callan, �-�� .... �� ,.F 5�„_, � �� :�. {- F r, a_ �� C 014 �.i!'( U� �C��i.�ii�_I�Lirri!IrIE ._.�:-)-�.�.,'-`."�:P,li';�G Gi''l. As requested on Friday, February 14, 2014, I visited the above site for the purpose of inspecting and commenting on the large magnolia tree in the center of the lot. The tree is very close to the existing garage and your concern as to the damage the tree is causing has prompted this visit. Method: All inspections were made from the ground; the tree was not climbed for this inspection. The tree in question was located on a"Not- to-Scale" map provided by me. The tree was then measured for diameter at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or diameter at breast height). The tree was given a condition rating for form and vitality. The trees' condition rating is based on SQ pezcent vitality and 50 percent form, using the following scale. 1 - 29 Very Poor 30 - 49 Poor 50 - 69 Fair 70 - 89 Good 90 - 100 Excellent The height of the tree was measured using a Nikon Forestry 550 Hypsometer. The spread was paced off. Comments and recommendations for future maintenance are provided. Observations: _ The tree in question is a southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) with a diameter at breast height of 26.1 inches. The tree is located in the rear center of the lot 18 inches from the corner of the existing garage. The estimated height of the magnolia is 35 feet with a total crown spread of 40 feet. The tree has poor to fair vigor with less than normal shoot growth for the species and some tip dieback. The form of the magnolia is fair however the location is very poor. The tree has a large root flare and an abundance of surface roots which are damaging the existing garage and a recently installed paver style patio. The trunk of the tree is currently touching the roof of the structure. Summary: The large magnolia is causing significant damage to a structure on the property and surrounding hardscape. The garage is planned for replacement and the magnolia most likely will not survive the demolition and rebuilding of the existing garage. Remove and replace the magnolia with a more suited species of tree in a location where the tree can thrive for years to come. Magnolia trunk 18 inches from existing garage. The information included in this report is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476A 1529 Howard/2/18%14 (2) Project Comments Date: To: From March 3, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 � Fire division (650J 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 7529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: Q28- 292-210 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: 1. Complete informafion on "Tree Work Plan" form and submit to Parks Division (850 Burlingame, Ave.) for approval . 2. Fill out °Protected Ti�e Removal Permir (attached) and submit to Park Division for approval. Include Arborist report and pictures. 3. Water Conservation requiremen#s fulfilled, irrigation plan, ok Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 3/5/14 Project Comments Date: To: From: January 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage at 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-210 Staff Review: January 21, 2014 1. Replace City street trees with 2- 24" box Gingko biloba. 2. Japanese Maples must be larger, upright varieties. 3. Arborist report needed for removal of Magnolia to determine if tree is diseased or structurally unsound. Landscape may need to protect magnolia and incorporate existing tree into landscape plans if tree is healthy. 4. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width of Planter Strip needs to be implemented. 5. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division (558-7330). 6. Tree Work Plan (attached) required for removal and replacement of City Street trees. 7. Landscape plan is required to meet `Water Conservation in Landscape Regulations" (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due for Final. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 1 /21 /14 M �r� - l 52� �� I certify � DUTD04R WATER USE EFFfC1ENCY CNECKLtST ect �,ingle Farnity O Multi-F; Applicant Name (printj: / Praject Site Address: Project Area (sq.ft, or acre) �i ; ��1i�=�ctE �� ;;.;t�-�:��:� �, �;� �,�!�z, t�,{�-i � r_ = 'me/ ' e specified requirements of the Water onserva 'on in Landscaping Ordinance. � � Date � _ , _ � _ .. _ . .. , - -... � O Commercial ❑ Instituti naI '� Irrigation only ❑ Industria! ❑ Other: �/:,�L%{/,i , eti 1 Cantact Phone N: ��.�Ci ' 2• 22� g! �O� # of Units: ' t� af M1�Feters: �otal LandscapeAre�,{sq.f�.j�.� /� �, � �� < <,� � v S,�• � `�� .��:��. �Jl�.l� 1- t ��_ a � �1�1'�� , E°l':` Turf Irrigated �1rea (sq.'it.): �1 �'aJ `! 1� � Y,� i 1 :1� i �- , . -� Non=furf irrigated Area (sq.ft.}: '{{ali' :7H � 1{:-.7�!. �1� � i.=,�_ 1 � N� .. v. , i:;� ,.,4. t � s, t :_- Spedal Landscape Area (SLA) (sq.ft.j: — ��,�'�'_ .�` Water Feature Surface Area (sq.ft.�: '� Non-Turf Agency, Review: I (Pass) . . (Fail) ,�r • ` �` O ; � ;,�1' l:] $. �: ❑ .. ;0. � "j�=t[�it+! ��' .1..: ��'�1,�Ic1�S-�i ( �r�?�_1 _ieJ. �1 i�"L - t. Less than 25% of the landscape area is Yes ,.U...�,�,; turf ❑ No, See Water f3�dget All turf areas are > 8 f�et �vide ^ Yes � -.' �t-• ~ L7 .' Afl turf is planted on siopes < 25°5 @.Yes � [} At least 80°0 of non-turf area is native l4.Yes " p.. or low water use plants J No, See Water Budget Plants are �rouped by Nydrozones s �. �:: ..O' ..; Mutch At least 7-inches of mulch on exposed es �l` .��O .. .. soil surfaces Irri�ation System Efficiency 70°k Efo (100% ETo for SIAs} Yes $: .. .• p; ... -- ----- -- - - - - - No overspray or runoff Yes .'Cf. �. l]: �; lrrlgatinn System Oesign System eificiency> 70% es ::;:�;� .. 'p �' :. Automatic, self-adjustfng irri�atEon o, not required for'Cier 1 ��:��'�: C7, .'�' controllers ❑ Yes Moisture sensor/rain sensor shuYofFs �.Yes ~ � � �� . 0 � No sprayheads in < 8-ft wide area. �.Yes .0' '.O, :. Irri�ation Tlme System only opetates between 8 PM 1�Yes � G and 10 AM � .. Metering Separate irrigation meter o, not required 6ecause < 5,Q00 sq.ft. -'� `. `':0' :: Swlrnming Pools / Spas Water Features Documentatlon Cover highly recommended Recfrculating Less than 1Q% of landsca ❑ Yes - • � ❑ Yes :. � , :❑ .:,_: No, not requirecf CI Yes : �-= : .:. :.0::.;, . - - -------- _ . _ ...._��.__.-- --- ------ =------: _,..: Yes ;.O>.:' 13.:::.: Yes "�: f!- . � O ' - Landscapeand Irrigation Design Plan 0 Prepared by applicant �.'Cl ._. �l:]: Prepared by proFessional Watcr Fiudget (optionalj � ❑ Prepared by applica�t � , �Q';`,:, - , ,l�', := - � ❑ Prepared by proiessional �' ' `� " Audit Post•installation audit contplete U Completed by applicant � ��" '- F �� : � !r Ca Completed by professional �� " � �� ', r �= j �' � �� , , , , . � _ °. n. ` r= Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: March 3, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558- 7334 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 � Fire division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 Erika Lewit, Planning revised plans for 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 292-210 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box 1) The Stormwater Requirements Checklist has been filled out and returned. It indicates that the project does trigger the new stormwater requirements. The applicant has indicated that sight design measures B.2.b,c,d will be implemented in the project. 2) Comments included in earlier review should be incorporated during building permit issuance. Reviewed by: SD � Date: 3/7/14 �� SAN MA'EO COUNTYWIDE 1Yaterf'cjlution F'c'�'eMionrrogram City of Burlingame - Office of 'Stormwater Ghecklist for Small Pro'ects � - j nvironmental Compliance Municipal Regional 5�ormwater Permit (MRP} 1'103 Airporf Bfvd arder Mo. R2-2D09-0074 ; Order No, R2-2011-0083 NPDES No. CAS612008 Office. (650) 342•3727 Fax: (650} 342�3712 Complete this form forindividual single famrly home projects of any size, otherprojects that creafe and/orreplace less than 10,000 square feet of impervioms surface, and projects rn the following categorres that create and/or replace Iess fhan 5,000 square feet of impervious surface: resfaurants, refai! gasoline outtets, auto servrce facilities', and parkrng lots (stand-alone or part of another ASProject lnformation �� `'� � �� A.1 Project Name: ��/ e� ,P.S� �-(/j(�Q� �� r- �i �-� 7 � i,� A,2 Project Address: �— �- /sz9 f��r� B. Select Appropriate Siie Design Measures B.7 Does the project create andlor replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surfaceZ? �Yes ❑ No ➢ If yes, and the project wil! r�cerve fina! discretionary approval on or affer December 1, 2012, the project musP include one of Site Design Measures a through f.3 Faci sheets regarding site design measures a fhrough f may be downloaded af htfp://www.flowstobay.ory/bs new development.php#flyers.. ➢ lf no, or fhe projecf will receive final discretionary approval before December 1, 2012, the proJecf rs encouraged fo implement srte desrgn measures4, which may be required at municrpality discretion. Consult with municipal staff aboui requirements for your project. B.2 Is the site design measure included in ihe proJect plans? Ptan Yes No I Sheet No. a. Direct roof runoff into cistems or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or other non-potable use. b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. c, Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vege-tated areas. d.. Direct runoff from driveways andlor uncovered parking lots onto,vegetated areas. e. Construct sldewalks, walkways, and/or pafios with permeable surfaces. f. Construct bEke lanes, driveways, andlor unco�ered parking (ots w'rth permeable surFaces. ❑ ❑ � "� U � ❑ ❑ ❑ I� ❑ ❑ g. Minirnize lar�d disfurbance and impervious surface. cialiy parking lots), h. Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space, i. Use micro-defention, including distributed landscape-based detention. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ j. Protect sensitive areas, incfuding weffand and riparian areas, and minimize changes to the natural topography. k. Self-treating area (see Section 42 of the C,3 Technicai Guidance) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I. Seif-retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C,3 Technical Guidance) m. Plant or preserve interceptortrees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guldance) I See Standard Industrial Classification (SiC) codes here. Z Complete the C.3/C.& Development Review Checklist if the project is not an individual single family home, and it creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of fmpervious surface; cr ?f it is a restauranf, retail gasoline outlef, auto service facflity, or parking lot project that creafes and/or repfaces 5,00� square faet or more of lmpervlous surface. 3 See MRP Provision C.3.i, 4 5ee MRP Provislon C.3.a.i.(6j. 1 Approved December 4, 2012 �'f Z z� — Z�l' Z— Z16 ��-; ��. o.= e��_� ;u�,��r,.� =- _ _: � : � .=.� � r� • � �cr =--�. 0 Sformwater Checklist for Smal! Projects , C, 5elect approprlate source controls (Encouraged forall projects; may be required af municipa! discretion. Consultmunicrpa! staff,5) Are these �eatures that features �� require source project? control measures Yes No ❑. ❑ Ll ❑� n �❑ Storm brain ? Floor Drains Parking garage Landscaping Source cantroi measures (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) I■ Mark on-site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent. ■ Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. ■ Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.s • Retain existing vegetation as practicabfe. ■ Select diverse species appropriate to the site, Include plants that are pest- and/or disease-resistant, drought-tolerant, andlor attract beneficial insects. ■ Minimize use of pesticides and quick-release fertilizers. ■ Use e�cient irriqation system� design to minimize runoff. ■ Provide connection to fhe sanitary sewer to facilitate draining.s Provide slnk or other area for equipment cleaning, which is: ■ Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer disci�arge.s ■ Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. • Indoors ar in an oufdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and run-off and siqned to require equipment washing in this area. ■ Provide a roofed and enclosed area ior dumpsters, recyciing containers, etc., desfgned to prevent stormwater run-on and ntnoff. ■ Connect any drains in or baneafh dumpsfers, compacfors and tallow bin areas servinq food service faciliiies to fhe sanitary sewer.� � Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and to drain to fhe sanitary sewer.s ■ Cnver the area or design to avoid pollutant canfact with stormwater runoff. ■ Locate area oniy on paved and contained areas. - Ftoof storage �reas tha# wiil contain non-hazardous liquids, dtain fo sanifary sewer6 and contain bv berms or similar. ■ Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runofF, plumb to the sanitary sewers, and s?gn as a designated wash area. ■ CommercEal car wash facilities shalf discharge fo fhe sanitary sewer.6 ■ Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an oufdoors area designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary contalnment. Do not install drains In fhe secondary containment areas. ■ No floor drains uniess pretreated prior fo discharge fo the sanitary sewer. 6 ■ Connecf contalners or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. 6 ■�ueling areas shall have lmpermeable surface that is a) minima[ly graded to . prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break. � Canopy shaif extend at least 10 ft In each direction from each pump and drain away from tueling area. ■ Cover and/or grade to minimlze run-on to and runoff from the foading area. • Position downspouts to direct stormwafer away from the loading area. ■ Draln water from loading cfock areas to the sanitary sewer,s ■ Install door skirts between the trailers and fhe buildinq. ■ Design for discharge of fire sprinkler iest water to landscaps or sanitary sewer6 � PooVSpa/Fountain ❑ Faod Service / � Equipment ��(non- residential} Refuse Areas [� � Ottfdoor Proc Activities Z� ❑ Outdoor Equipmeni/ Materials Storage ❑ VehicEe/ Equipment Cfeanin ❑ Vehicie/ Equipment Repafr artd ' Maintenance ❑ jD� Fuel • Dispensing Areas ❑ Loading Docks ❑ Fire Sprinklers ❑ ❑� Misce(laneous ■ Drain condensate of alr condifioning units to landscaping. Large air Drain or Wash conditianing units may connect to the sanitary sewer,fi Wafer • Roof drains shail drain to unpaved area where practicabls. ■ Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, ail washwater to sanitary sewers. Architectural ■ Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and Copper dispose properly offsite, See flyer "Requirements for Archifectural Copper.° S See MRP Provision C.3.a.1(7). 2 Is source control measure included in project plarts? Plan ies No Sheet No, ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ L�, p Lz- a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ �` ❑ ❑ � a ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Approved December 4, 2012 Stormwater Checkiisf for Smal! Projecfs , D'. Irnplement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required forall projects.) � D,1 Is the site a"H1gh Priority Site"? (Municipa! staff wi!! make fhis determination; if the answeris yes, Yes ❑ �o tha project will be referred fo consfrucfion site inspection staff fo.r monfhly stormwaterinspecfions during the wet season, October 1 through Apri13D.) •"High priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are . otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6,e,ii(2). a.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicaie which BMPs are included in the project, below. Yes No 8est Mana ement Practice BMP ❑ Attach the San Matso Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construcfion BMP plan sheet to �project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the pian sheet ❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas until permanent erosion controls are established. _ ❑ Delineate with field markers clearing iimits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones, trees, and draina e courses. ❑ Provide notes, specifications, or aftachrnents describing the following: ■ Construction, operation and maintenance of eroslon and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; * Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetafion, and storage and d[sposal of excavated or cleared materfal; • Specifications for vegetative cover & mulch, include methods and schedufes far planting and fertifization; • Provisions for tem ora and/or ermanent irri ation. ❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities onl . during dry weather, � ❑ Use sediment controls or fiftration to remove sediment when dewaterin and obfairi all necessary permits. []� Protect afl storm drain inlets in vlcinfty of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters. �. � Trap sediment on-site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, check dams, soil blanke#s or mats covers for soil stock ifes, etc. ❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; divert ofF sife runoff around the site {e.g., swales and dikes). ❑ Protect adjacent propertles and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative bufFer sirips, , sediment barriers or filters dikes mulching or other measures as appropriate. ❑ Limit construction access routes and stabfllze deslgnated access ❑ [� No cleaning, ftleling, or maintaining vehicles on-site, except in a designated area where washwater is contained and treated. ❑ Sfore, handle, and dis ose of construction materials/wasfes properfy to prevent contact with stormwater. ❑ Contractor shalf train and rovide instruction fo all em lo ees/subcontracfors re: construction BMPs.' � Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water #rom architectural copper, and non-stormwater dlscharges to storm drains and watercourses. Name of appficant completing the Sig E. Comments (for muntcipa! staff use onty): F. NOTES �for munic�pal staff use only); Section A N Section B Notes: .� olv . �ra� Date: �"' � 2_ � 6 Any connection fo the sanitary sewer system Is subject to sanitary dlstrict approval. � Businesses that may have outdoor procass activitieslequipment include mach'sne shops, aufo repair, indus.tries with pretreatment facllities. 3 Approved December 4, 2012 i• Project Comments Date: January 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558- 7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Planning Staff Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage at 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-210 January 21, 2014 1) Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single �amily home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious surFace. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached "Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these requirements please refer to the attached ffyer "New Stormwater Control Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/C3iNewRegsSmProjSep 2012.doc To obtain a checklist electronically, the document is available at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section4/StormChecklistSmallProj Dec2012.doc 2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section5/ConstBMPPIanJun2012. pdf 3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at: http://flowstobay.org/files/privatend/MRPsourcebk/Section8/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs . pdf For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727 Reviewed by: SD Date: 1/16/14 Project Comments Date: To: From: March 3, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 � Fire division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 Erika Lewit, Planning Subject: revised plans for 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028- 292-210 - original comments, response to comments, and revised plans are in your In- Box Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 1-15-2014 will apply to this project. , Reviewed by• �' �� `"'J �� "'� /- Date: 3-10-2014 �� ,�:�.�� _,�.� _ .. �_,�_.. ,� �, �„�. ,..�,-,�.h �. � Project Comments Date: To: From: January 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage at 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-210 Staff Review: January 21, 2014 � On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California ,� Building Codes. � Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy � Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. Note: The California Building Standards Commission has delayed implementation of the 2013 Energy Codes. If an application is submitted for this project prior to July 1, 2013 then the project will be required to comply with the �. 008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. ee City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) � On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. 5) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 6) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 7) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 8) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 9) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 10)When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 11)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 12)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 1 Obtain a survey of the property lines. �1 RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and fhe net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawin_qs. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. Note: The areas labeled "Den" and Theater" are rooms that can be used for eeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. ndicate on the plans that, at the time of Building Permit application, plans and engineering will be submitted for shoring as required by 2013 CBC, Chapter 31 regarding the protection of adjacent property and as required by OSHA. On the plans, indicate that the following will be addressed: a. The walls of the proposed basement shall be properly shored, prior to construction activity. This excavation may need temporary shoring. A competent contractor shall be consulted for recommendations and design of shoring scheme for the excavation. The recommended design type of shoring shall be approved by the engineer of record or soils engineer prior to usage. b. All appropriate guidelines of OSHA shall be incorporated into the shoring design by the contractor. Where space permits, temporary construction slopes may be utilized in lieu of shoring. Maximum allowable vertical cut for the subject project will be five (5) feet. Beyond that horizontal benches of 5 feet wide will be required. Temporary shores shall not exceed 1 to 1(horizontal to vertical). In some areas due to high moisiure content / water table, flatter slopes will be required which will be recommended by the soils engineer in the field. c. If shoring is required, specify on the plans who's sole responsibility it is to design and provide adequate shoring, bracing, fortnwork, etc. as required for the protection of life and property during construction of the building. d. Shoring and bracing shall remain in place until floors, roof, and wall sheathing have been entirely constructed. e. Shoring plans shall be wet-stamped and signed by the engineer-of-record and submitted to the city for review prior to construction. If applicable, include surcharge loads from adjacent structures that are within the zone of influence (45 degree wedge up the slope from the base of the retaining wall) and / or driveway surcharge loads. �ndicate on the plans that an OSHA permit will be obtained for the shoring* at the excavation in the basement per CAL / OSHA requirements. See the Cal / OSHA handbook at: http://www.ca-osha.com/qdfpubs/osha userquide.pdf * Construction Safety Orders : Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Article 6, Section 1 41.1. 1'%' ndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the � partment of Public Works. ��"r'ovide one emergency escape and egress from each sleepinq room in the ��` basement area. On the plans provide details for the window well as reauired by � 2013 CBC §1029.5.1 and for the required ladder access from this area as described in 2013 CBC §1029.5.2. Provide complete details for a guardrail around this opening at grade level. See also 2013 CRC §R310. 19)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 20)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC 1009. Provide lighting at all exterior landings. �Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood-burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood-burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood-burning device. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for nning Commission action. _�.-.�-_.— � Reviewed by�-�``�� :.-�-i�"' '� Date: 1-15-201 Joe ;'�BO� 65 -5 -7270 � ✓ Project Comments Date: To: From: January 13, 2014 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 BFire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage at 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-210 Staff Review: January 21, 2014 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split befinreen domestic and fire protection lines. 3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas. 4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: � Date: Z 1 i��°,"`_/y Project Comments Date: �� From: January 13, 2014 X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story house with a detached garage at 1529 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-210 Staff Review: January 21, 2014 1. See attached review comments #1, 2, 5, 14 and 20. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Applicant is advised to call City Arborist regarding potential relocation of sidewalk area for new street trees in the planter strip. 4. A geotechnical report is required for the proposed basement. The report must identify all adverse impacts including but not limited to structural design, shoring, groundwater fluctuations and impacts to adjacent properties and provide mitigation measures. 5. Basement perimeter drainage design is required with proposed potential groundwater pumping requirements with backup power as necessary. 6. All basement construction must be completed within one rain season. Reviewed by: V V Date: 2/04/2014 � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS +`� 'T""� ��'�``'� Project Name• �+�j�� (�� Gr�'° Project Address: �� b�'U-1�2D ' The followi_ng req_uirements apply to the project 1 � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land . surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical featurzs and utilities. (Required prior to the building perLnit issuance.) �K�Y� q..4�43 dv '(�r� �'f�c(�`-0 �� `�� d� t_-1.�:-�,��-�0 ��i.�r�,e�t�� Sr+.k��.�R-. 2 � The site and roof drainage sha11 be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. 'I�e applicant sha11 submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A,�'`g"anitary sewer lateral � is required for the project in accordance with tlie City's standards. ) 6. The project plans sha11 show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump sta.tions and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit tra�c trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated i_mpacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNiNG REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVI5ION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land sha11 be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closuxe/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project sha11 submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 � The project shall, at its own cost, desib�n and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project sha11, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project rnay cause adverse impacts duri.ng construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 � The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW CONIlVIENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street urto private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area s�all be located inside the building. A drain connecting �he garbaae area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEVJ COMI��NTS.doc . CITY OF BURLINGAME r ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD '� � � ,1 BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 a FAX: (650) 6J6-3790 � www.burlingame.org - Site: 1529 HOWARD AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning [ommission announces the follawing public hearing on MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. in the [ity Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Environmental Review and Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage at 1529 HOWARD AVENUE zoned R-l. APN 028-292-210 Mailed: March 14, 2014 (Please refer to ofher sideJ . ` - `_ -. V ... .� . _ .. f '_. ,. .� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE �it� of Burfingam� A copy oi the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califiornia. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in writien correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional infiormation, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director �U�LIC HEARINC NOTICE (Please r-efer to ofher side) =.7 r " �!`.:'. JJ '� yF - °in.'k". � L , � - _ � . � r.�z� .:. .,� i � ��-`•. F, i � � �� k , }r , , � � S� '� . . � �� '" �� d � Sy�� Yy. t��! i� d $� . � �'y i'�iY. `� m �p ; • . . �. � � Na�� s:.. � r�1� � '� . . '_ � , �y �, � ,� , � R � k�:�-� � . " '�'�� , "'* �� , ` �. � �, . , . . . �`� � .�. � � . � � . - (�.� R i 1 � �; � . • '� � p � � � M1 � '� a . . � . " .!'n ^L.i. O �' �g .7� � ,�� • .�:. .� �� _ � � �' $ �� r., � � '„ }` , �� w. � _ � .: . . . s _ � - � � Po . ��" �'� ° � � .. ' x�� ; �, � �;,-^�r.m� ,%�� s � ,� � 4 ;� ,. , �,� `�� 1 w�' '�ti �� ., � k� � Z� �� , .� �� . O � .,�- �� . ° �:�.�� :,, '�" /` ,� � "'�' � �a, �;� ��` `� , �� ' .� (/� { { '� " �� . , � lly; . � � . yx . v � � . ,,�`a� � : . 4 ,' � �°z^.� o �. � � � ", � �: "�a ° v �, . � _ � , . �, � `�- , . .,� �. � ., . ... .a � � ��, . a x... .� . ' . c � � _# R � .. ' -, ^: � . � ` � : �� '; . � �. •�,� .,� �k „ . . � + �� ' .S � n �.: ��, y t�,, °C.+�e�." =& s r n. _ix f t ;Y �',k �� 'i�.,,., �((� ,�, � .. � ., ".S a � T _ ,. �� a � �_' � p� �.L� s ��: r .. S ;.�. � �,wv.r�.. �� . � i ,4 �,LA�'�� } �tsY�f f..'� �� T' Kr'� a� � ,%("'3 � t - � �,� , � �"� `"sc:�.�,� -`` +�,� \\ - +� �;��` V u � -� �. �` .', �� °� � � '�� N �' �r� . � � � > � "��• � .. A" 3 � - . . . � ,4 .. . . � '�. ...� . � .. .� � ', ' , v � � e � L • . � �� . .. - t .i...�' *3`;, �""� �; ♦ . ..� . .,, . ��,.�. .. t� . .. ,�,.e' � "' �' ` . n. . _ � �,: .;. " � "� i �. � e'� ♦ � �„ �..s '' 1:{h � .� �s" ,� f . �.`;a'.." , vt;.!! �, i�' � �;ws. j�. r,�, ..: �.v � �� M'� � . � .^"";. � .,. �A: :.. �� .. �� ,�-� � �� .e� � �.�.� ,.:::H - a ., ' . .. �� .,. � � �'�:.:- � er�r x'� .� �. . �i �:.. c h ' .. -. u :,. ,y . � � ._- . • �-` : � �- g'� > '_ ." �� e��Wr �" �� : . , � � � - . �5 . �e., f s . � N, � . . . . ,�^ x. . � d . � � �.� �� " � '+��- ��eee ,� �-�" .. ..T ' ¢^ ... .8 .. ... ` ��, f ' '... �..� ' � . 'Y«� ♦ n ...� f .'Nyr `�'„�} � � ' Ps� � �r� -. : �,� :, `�_ .7��;e:n .%%�:s" ... .A«' y;• �r ,,,s:,,a,�v �� . .. . "t �,.�»- � : a�^ �� "F` V� , " s4.� _ ^ a aro° ,� ,c...- , .. ,�., . � .... � . ' , tt `y . • . ,� _ N " ,� � '�; �' � .. ., .._ ,�� .; . .' � . �` �`�� . f �� q ��. vG 's� _ " •�.�• '� � � ,� a ._ - , "k ", � , � ,'sr� -�� , x � ..� ��j r `�� e� „ - � . _ . �� 4 3`' � .�" ..'-� `<r) tzj� �,a .,�; �e " � • , ' � � �.� < �^^4� � • �a �� . y° ' :,n \ !1' i� ., `�� . `' a� . �' � -";, � � t- T. r �_l. `i` . �� '�`': ��k+'�� . � '� �' F ' ��` � � s * �, . . : . ` '; ' ` ` '� � � s '� . • # !!�' '�: � �� , t > �,� �<< �. l � , ,�`. � � ° � w,� ., , � " ,,�= r_•�, ; "�� ;,,� ;t �. "@I �i` H� � p � `�" _ ' 4 .. v , ,� �. , � . � � , _ '"�'. , , - , „ .. • � �.� -�� '�� , . ,,. ., ryt :�. K ..a. k � . �. . y ., T.. m , t.., .. . � �.'� . � C..._ �.., , � � � 1 � � �. � �4u ��: P� TS y�, +� �� 'a. '`!<'�i' y � �k � ; ' e:+a,Y � ,�°'*` R �/ � � � �„� . `�� ~, <.r� � �r ,��r �" � �,� � :� �.;;� h t � _ �. ` .. - � n. m. " +�� '' '.' ,�. 5�� ...., � ; ,' n _. � � • .' � ��t�^� � �'y� -i ., . 4� � ' . �[• .-�. �^.:. . e� .. . � . �Y �� rtj,'�, � % � , ?.,. '_ �' p � ,.. ." �" '�2'e ,, .� _ ^.. @ .� ;"u ; ''�"' %, �, , - . , : �� '; . ... r r . ..-,qq,c; :. .w .y . � :'�, ,� � �� , .� „...,� l.. � �:� �. ..,� �.. . r `t ,-.. �¢� . ' «.: . - �.}� � ` � � '�tS,m r . � � ; t , �, � .-:+,�� : �- � .,,. i . z:�.��,,,s k �' .,.»��; �'"�" a-� �; r �. l � ..< . � '� _ . - . • ' •;`"� �, �r�' ,.. , . : � �i � .. �a .. ,� ' . . _y *s;" ...;- -� _�s,-, x,�_ � . � � . � ,� i�� ,tit f a; « . : r � i 3 � � k f �., aa; ...� . . � . � .:� ;�� :: Q � . �. r " f �r . , . : R _ ��o � , V , � , ,:� } ;} r-. ° � � r � ;�, .� . _ . . �,. .:. _ . � � ,. �� .p `"�, :. - �. �` ,_ - � �. • � ,� . ; _ � ,� �`�.�, �a... , � <, . r. . ,, _ L.' . ' s j --y:. �# � , ; :?W y� � 4 . � a r ' , '� . .;.�� Lb �,:! <„y, . ; <: �'. ;'�,� �9.`-: ,. � , , .: .,t. • ; ': ' � . ? ' � "�`tr � �.. + - w � � � � � '� ' ,�+�w,� t.. :. v �'� ' `:�' �, ' ' � i ��,.`,v ,� p '�,�� ;�' ��. .; � `*•w. � . , 4-� � i�t� ' � �� . �F ' �� .� e '-�� ... � �f �;� �, � � �. ' x 4 `�.. � �.'u°' :.y • • I • • � � � -.� �92w yee:p ' A : .. 7 a . :.. ' y �. , . .. .. � ` . - � .. .� . � �.:� � .. {�,,$ � . .; � ..:. ` . ' , . . , ti , , ^ ., • �' � . . A.y � .i�a`� � ' z. ' ' � � ` i r r� � .:.�:�± �d-�i,<�_ - �':