HomeMy WebLinkAbout1521 Howard Avenue - Approval Letter�� CITY Q
� �
BURLINGAME
m
`y�o4 00
�NSTEG JUNE 6•
The City of Burlingame
�! -
CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 558-7250
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790
February 19, 2003
Ron Grove
570 B Marine View
Belmont, CA 94061
Dear Mr. Grove,
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the February 10, 2003 Planning Commission
approval of your application for a design review became effective February 18, 2003. This application was to
allow the construction of a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1521 Howard Avenue,
zoned R-1.
The February 10, 2003 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved with the
following conditions:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
January 30, 2003, Sheets 1 through 5 and L-1, site plan, floor plans, building elevations and landscape
plan;
� 2. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the firs�
or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or
relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to
design review;
3. that the conditions of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Recycling Specialist and Chief Building Official's
memos dated December 23, 2002 shall be met;
4. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners,
set the building envelope;
5. that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new
structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
6. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;
7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed
professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window
locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved
in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury;
8. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according
to the approved Planning and Building plans;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as
amended by the City of Burlingame; and
10. that the applicant shall submit a Certified Arborist report to address tree protection measures to be
employed on the site during construction and during a three year maintenance period and to be approved
by the City Arborist before a building permit is issued.
Reimbursement of the design review ...;posit has been processed and will be mailed to you under separate cover.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Deparhnent. This
approval is valid for one year during which time' a building permit must be issued. One extension of up to one
year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days
of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law.
Sincerely yours,
���' Y� \��
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
CAK\s
1521 howa.cca
c. Fred Strathdee, architect
Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(LOT 6 BLOCK 5 BURLINGAME PARK NO 2 RSM B/17; APN# 028-292-230)
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 11, 2002
TO: _City Engineer
Cluef Building Official
Fire Marshal
✓ Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff ---`�_ -_-'
_ _ ,,.. �
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1521 Howard
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-230.
STAFF REVIEW:
��� ��� ���� � ��� ����
��� a� ��=�s - �
� �� ��
�� ��
c�n�+2��� , ` � �w��--
l r��� ,��� � _ . � ���
���,c,,,{w-`�-e�— _ �✓,u,v ��p
�w,- � r r "
� ��� � �_
> , ,
�- �
�� �i�� �u � � .
Reviewed By: / Date of Comments: T�d2—
ROUTIIVG FORM
DATE:
December 11, 2002
TO: City Engineer
Chief Building Official
✓ Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
��s: �1:
Planning Staff
SUBJECT:
Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1521 Howard
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-230.
STAFF REVIEW:
� cro ..� � �e.� a r�s �.�'-,.-� w�. � �.�- �, s p�:.��..e�- b � �l�c ea-�..
�� � '�� �'.�. ���v c��e. -
Reviewed By: Date of Comments: /2/7' �I�Z
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 11, 2002
TO: _City Engineer
✓Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff _ . ' '==�=
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1521 Howard
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 028-292-230.
STAFF REVIEW:
/V� �°�.��`.'% �
Reviewed By: � Date of Comments: f z-z� ��
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 11, 2002
TO: �City Engineer
_Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff - " ._ --�
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling at 1521 Howard
Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 02$-292-230.
STAFF REVIEW:
=� �
Reviewed By:
'Y.� '
Date of Comments: �`��
�. _
'` '� �
�
, � _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGIlVEERING DIVISION
PLANNING REVIEW COMII�NTS � -(wo —s-tw�
Project Name:-fS'c+�,�. �
�h""�/''�.. �..
-Project Address:_ ��{ow=k�
The following requirements apply to the project
1 _� A property boundary survey sha11 be preformed by a licensed land ,
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the
building permit issuance.) a ��iY�{ � �;�-�� � � � �' k{i9��Yl�,
"�`N%dY� C�`ti`�b3CS 8� Y��a.l,�t� �p j� � �car— '�'O
2 _,�,� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to u�
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit ���r�i�a^'[' .
issuance.)
� 3. �� The applicant sha11 submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building pernut.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requirements.
5 %l A sanitary sewer lateral �t is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standazds. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.)
6. The project plans sha11 show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mitig�+���neasures.
8 Submit traf�ic trip generation analysis for the project.
9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should
identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
, . , .
, ' PUBLIC WORK5 DEPARTMENT ENGIlVEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the pazcel map
for reviews.
12, Map closure/lot closure calculations sha11 be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
; appurtenant work.
15 The project shail, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles,
trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traf�ic, pedestrian traf�ic
and public on street parking. The project sha11 identify ttiese impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City.
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for the proposed creek enclostue. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the azea of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 Any work wit,hin the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
�- -_>-� _ -- __ � Department of �is�i anc� �rame Permit and Army Corps of Engineers �- { - - --
Permits.
19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 �- The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevenf storm water pollution.
21 _� The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re-
submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 _� The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans
showing the driveway profile with elevations
Page 2 of 3
U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW CONIIvIENTS.doc
`, -.. ,
,
' t. ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
u
23 � The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store sha11 be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage azea to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
, -�_ _ _ - �_
Page 3 of 3
U:�private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc