HomeMy WebLinkAbout1500 Howard Avenue - CEQA DocumentENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT
Application for a Planning Department
Determination on the Need for a Project EIR
Form E2, Revised July 1975
Tentative, Subject to Revision
1. PROJECT
Name
Date Filed rn- -3 7(�.
Recommendation
Date Posted
CEQA File No. /V,T] - P? `-'
Description -�
Type of Permit Required AFe 0A3a 5;,Yli'ret. '60,v! 0/ 40
2. APPLICANT
Name Jed hle�el r-;&e,/'5-o4717 Telephone
Address /.5 er yuoef,-el / , roy&e
3. PROPERTY
Owner's Name 501 emw Telephone 39 3 3 s 8
Owner's Address %. -or, f/ecva'-ey, AtIrIyI&
Legal Lot Block 4__
Description: Subdivision �P .,-11he'IAfe, / /r APN az�' z V-0/L
Land Area // Zone'- /
4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS �cMq� �lLvr„�c,• Cy7�u�l/,�,,�; ,'s /0l'4lal e917 xya x)/s
5. PROPOSED PROJECT (01y1,4%7,e live /Of . %7 f,, 'O'o-eel
6. FEE: $25
Receipt No. Z 3 7 z Received by GUVG'L &a,,
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the
information given herein is true and -correct to the
best of my kno ledg > and belief.
Signature ✓ ate
g 3�7
(Applicant —��
7. EVALUATION BY CITY PLANNER 1_71/S /c/ a+GS xil,, el;
Sid - ihN AD 10 /0/5 e f P4 e AMU r
ec
-75
�,r/wngouke av�c �r�.� 2-i fo7
Signature
ti, cr-" (YO M ..41 W_7� c4ka k d1.2
as n/ YY 11_1 /'
dilr 4 A //4 any f wa11zxl,f eo
kf, , Z -- 76. Ile
i r2IlEK 0/ /c/ 3
Date
City
Planner)
DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT PROPOSED PROJECT
8. IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT
What are the objectives of this project? Cr('d ole / -
What alternatives to this project have been considered?
How much environmental effect will this project have? /✓a
What are the adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if
the project is implemented? /MW
I
What mitigation measures are proposed to reduce these adverse impacts?
/IrWe
9. PROJECT DETAILS
A.
!'p
Present land uses, project area:
Use 1 (describe, area SF) ,
Use 2 if 11it )
Use 3 if it
It
)
Present land uses, areas adjacent to the project:
ea/5;'u, �n F lPav
Z S f
C. Effect on �opograph and natural features:
D. Effect on trees and vegetation: /)&,c
n o:, e
E. Proposed construction
Below grade
First Floor
Second Floor
Third & above
F.
G.
H.
I.
Lot coverage (area)
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Building height
Proposed materials
(Gross floor area, GFA, in square feet, SF)
4�f � h<-
J. Estimated Flows in
gallons per day
Water consumption (gpd)
Wastewater from site (gpd)
K. Estimated people at site
Number of residents
Permanent employees
Visitors, customers, etc.
to site
L. Estimated parking required
Autos all day parking
Autos short term parking
Trucks and service vehicles
M. Estimated vehicle movements
A.M. peak hour
P.M. peak hour
(o)
Existinq In 2 Years In 5 Years
to site from site
to site from site
'1 LXII:U1IT 13 DECLAI'WrioN
.
• ,
Tentative Procedure
_
<•,('1"' 0 5/1.0/73, subject to Revision
:
•1500 HOWAkD AVENUE
.. ,
''•'"�`\\�`
• '
1'Lo3ecL
naares!; or Location
l3Uff2Llf��:l�M11 : �
TO: COUNTY CLERK
i' • .,
�. County of San Matco
Redwood City, California
94063.File
No.. ND-89P
Project Title: Gittelsohn Property
Type of Permit: Reclassification
Legal Description: Lot 3 Block 4 Burlingame Park
Portion of.APN 028-291-010
i
Zone: R-1
i
Property Owner: Applicant:
Name: Sol and Hope Gittelsohn
Name: Sol
Gittelsohn'
Address • 1500 Howard Avenue
Address
_
Burlingame, U . 94010
' Contact Person: Area
Code:
Phone: 343-3758
PROJECT DESCRIPTI''i.: Reclassify one lot from R-1
to R-3 to combine
two lot - _into .
one R-3 parcel. A single family dwelling is located on two lots at the northwesterly
corner of El Camino Real and Howard Avenue. No immediate project
has been proposed just
the rezoning of one R-1 lot.
1
The City of Burlingame by Wayne M. Swan on August 4 1976
19 76 , completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
(x) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Environmental'Impact Report EIR-32P for the reclassification
JJ )teasons for a Conclusion: of --the lot a❑d-a � g:3
PC. Res. No.?_-75 and later modi e. an cer i ileea y e ci y -Councili�ZT, ly
Reclassification of this lot was recommended by PC Res No 3-75 ado❑tPd March in 197.5• The resulting R-3 parcel would be 12�5 L.F. in area. The urban corner lot could be
improved with an 8 to 10 unit apartment building fronting on Howard with a 20 foot side setback
from E1 Camino such an improvement would have little or no adverse impact but measurable
benefits to the City .of Burlingame. -
Date Signed Signatu e of Processing Oific�ai
City Planner
Title
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination
+ ::hall be final.
1 Date Posted : / % /C / i' i'
DEC1.7I1ATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a Deputy City Clerk of the -
City of Burlingaine and that I posted a true copy Of the above Negative
I)Cclaration at the City tlall of said City near the doors to the Council
Chtuubers on:
Executed at Burlingame, California, on 197
Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ) No
/�1 Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST: ✓
E—WrLYN 11. TILL, City Clerk
City of: Burlingame
6 5
W
0 � �_ rs,,
1
a
V ° Ggrq, E i
v h i F•,��r� � i S:
2
to Twc/%.;,7
� � G r „��qt•s ? f.
_Formes• Lo
rt 00
�1 • tr
QPo.rer
• I — x
C.
EL CA M I N 0 REAL
U
I.M11111.1' 13 - 1,11 DATIVE 1)ECLAIIATION
_ Teni.itivc P170ccdure t
<;C'11'Y �, 5/10/73, Subject to Revision •1500 HOWAD AVENUE q7'
c-;","� ,
pro3ecL Address or Location
T0: COUNTY CLERK
ti• i' County of San tlateo
j 't...."L' • Redwood City,. California 94063
• • • File No.• ND-89P
Project Title: Gittelsohn Property
Type of Permit: Reclassification
Legal Description: Lot 3 Block 4 Burlingame Park
Portion of,APN 028-291-010
_Zone: R-1
Property Owner:
Name: Sol and Hope Gittelsohn•
Address: 1500 Howard Avenue
App scan .
Name: Sol Gittelsohn _
Address
Contact Person• Area Code: Phone: 343-3758
i PROJECT DESCRIP.TI`-id:^Reclassify one lot from R-1 to R-3 to rombi6e twn lntc into
one R-3 parcel. A single'family dwelling is located on -two lots at the northwesterly
corner of 11 Camino Real and Howard Avenue. No immediate project has been proposed just
the rezoning of one R-1 lot.
l The City of Burlingame by 4layne M. Swan on August 4, 197E
. 19 76 , completed a review of the proposed projeot and detei-mined that:
{. ) It will not have a significant effect on the environn:er_t.
(X) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Environmental -impact Report EIR-32P for the reclassification
Reasons for a Conclusion:
• PC. Res. No.2-75 and later modi e. an cer i ie y e ci y counei pri
Reclassification of this lot was recommended by Pr a rIo 3-75 adnoted i4ar_cn u
The resulting R-3 parcel would be 12, 560 S.F. in area. The urban corner lot could be l
Improved with an 8 to 10 unit apartment building fronting on Howard with a 20 foot side setback
from E1 Camino such an improvement would have little or no adverse impact but measurable
benefits to the City .of Burlingame. (�
Date Sig ed SignatuYe c� Processing O�_ic_�1
City Planner
Title
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the &-termis:=_=ion
shall be final.
Date Posted:
MCLAI.A ION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I and a Deputy City Clerk of the-
Ci.ty of Burlinganiae and that I posted a true copy of the above Mega ti-`e
Declaration at the City Ball of said City near the doors to the Council
Chambers on:
Executed at Burlingame, California, on 197
Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ).No
Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:
EVELYN II. HILL, City Clerk
City of Burlingame
so*
an
I /
EL,
2
� 22
x 25
RECLAsSII"ICATION
FRcm R-I To R-3 DI STRICT
32�FC-Rat-1C;7-- Etr-. - 32_P 7410/75
CAMINO REAL
23
24
27..
2 9
x., y
m�. -0�a . 2 8
I
b O y I
60'
Present R-3 boundary .
awlM
Sor
/yeti
- 27
cz