Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1500 Howard Avenue - CEQA DocumentENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Application for a Planning Department Determination on the Need for a Project EIR Form E2, Revised July 1975 Tentative, Subject to Revision 1. PROJECT Name Date Filed rn- -3 7(�. Recommendation Date Posted CEQA File No. /V,T] - P? `-' Description -� Type of Permit Required AFe 0A3a 5;,Yli'ret. '60,v! 0/ 40 2. APPLICANT Name Jed hle�el r-;&e,/'5-o4717 Telephone Address /.5 er yuoef,-el / , roy&e 3. PROPERTY Owner's Name 501 emw Telephone 39 3 3 s 8 Owner's Address %. -or, f/ecva'-ey, AtIrIyI& Legal Lot Block 4__ Description: Subdivision �P .,-11he'IAfe, / /r APN az�' z V-0/L Land Area // Zone'- / 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS �cMq� �lLvr„�c,• Cy7�u�l/,�,,�; ,'s /0l'4lal e917 xya x)/s 5. PROPOSED PROJECT (01y1,4%7,e live /Of . %7 f,, 'O'o-eel 6. FEE: $25 Receipt No. Z 3 7 z Received by GUVG'L &a,, I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and -correct to the best of my kno ledg > and belief. Signature ✓ ate g 3�7 (Applicant —�� 7. EVALUATION BY CITY PLANNER 1_71/S /c/ a+GS xil,, el; Sid - ihN AD 10 /0/5 e f P4 e AMU r ec -75 �,r/wngouke av�c �r�.� 2-i fo7 Signature ti, cr-" (YO M ..41 W_7� c4ka k d1.2 as n/ YY 11_1 /' dilr 4 A //4 any f wa11zxl,f eo kf, , Z -- 76. Ile i r2IlEK 0/ /c/ 3 Date City Planner) DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT PROPOSED PROJECT 8. IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT What are the objectives of this project? Cr('d ole / - What alternatives to this project have been considered? How much environmental effect will this project have? /✓a What are the adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the project is implemented? /MW I What mitigation measures are proposed to reduce these adverse impacts? /IrWe 9. PROJECT DETAILS A. !'p Present land uses, project area: Use 1 (describe, area SF) , Use 2 if 11it ) Use 3 if it It ) Present land uses, areas adjacent to the project: ea/5;'u, �n F lPav Z S f C. Effect on �opograph and natural features: D. Effect on trees and vegetation: /)&,c n o:, e E. Proposed construction Below grade First Floor Second Floor Third & above F. G. H. I. Lot coverage (area) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Building height Proposed materials (Gross floor area, GFA, in square feet, SF) 4�f � h<- J. Estimated Flows in gallons per day Water consumption (gpd) Wastewater from site (gpd) K. Estimated people at site Number of residents Permanent employees Visitors, customers, etc. to site L. Estimated parking required Autos all day parking Autos short term parking Trucks and service vehicles M. Estimated vehicle movements A.M. peak hour P.M. peak hour (o) Existinq In 2 Years In 5 Years to site from site to site from site '1 LXII:U1IT 13 DECLAI'WrioN . • , Tentative Procedure _ <•,('1"' 0 5/1.0/73, subject to Revision : •1500 HOWAkD AVENUE .. , ''•'"�`\\�` • ' 1'Lo3ecL naares!; or Location l3Uff2Llf��:l�M11 : � TO: COUNTY CLERK i' • ., �. County of San Matco Redwood City, California 94063.File No.. ND-89P Project Title: Gittelsohn Property Type of Permit: Reclassification Legal Description: Lot 3 Block 4 Burlingame Park Portion of.APN 028-291-010 i Zone: R-1 i Property Owner: Applicant: Name: Sol and Hope Gittelsohn Name: Sol Gittelsohn' Address • 1500 Howard Avenue Address _ Burlingame, U . 94010 ' Contact Person: Area Code: Phone: 343-3758 PROJECT DESCRIPTI''i.: Reclassify one lot from R-1 to R-3 to combine two lot - _into . one R-3 parcel. A single family dwelling is located on two lots at the northwesterly corner of El Camino Real and Howard Avenue. No immediate project has been proposed just the rezoning of one R-1 lot. 1 The City of Burlingame by Wayne M. Swan on August 4 1976 19 76 , completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. (x) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Environmental'Impact Report EIR-32P for the reclassification JJ )teasons for a Conclusion: of --the lot a❑d-a � g:3 PC. Res. No.?_-75 and later modi e. an cer i ileea y e ci y -Councili�ZT, ly Reclassification of this lot was recommended by PC Res No 3-75 ado❑tPd March in 197.5• The resulting R-3 parcel would be 12�5 L.F. in area. The urban corner lot could be improved with an 8 to 10 unit apartment building fronting on Howard with a 20 foot side setback from E1 Camino such an improvement would have little or no adverse impact but measurable benefits to the City .of Burlingame. - Date Signed Signatu e of Processing Oific�ai City Planner Title Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination + ::hall be final. 1 Date Posted : / % /C / i' i' DEC1.7I1ATION OF POSTING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a Deputy City Clerk of the - City of Burlingaine and that I posted a true copy Of the above Negative I)Cclaration at the City tlall of said City near the doors to the Council Chtuubers on: Executed at Burlingame, California, on 197 Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ) No /�1 Deputy City Clerk ATTEST: ✓ E—WrLYN 11. TILL, City Clerk City of: Burlingame 6 5 W 0 � �_ rs,, 1 a V ° Ggrq, E i v h i F•,��r� � i S: 2 to Twc/%.;,7 � � G r „��qt•s ? f. _Formes• Lo rt 00 �1 • tr QPo.rer • I — x C. EL CA M I N 0 REAL U I.M11111.1' 13 - 1,11 DATIVE 1)ECLAIIATION _ Teni.itivc P170ccdure t <;C'11'Y �, 5/10/73, Subject to Revision •1500 HOWAD AVENUE q7' c-;","� , pro3ecL Address or Location T0: COUNTY CLERK ti• i' County of San tlateo j 't...."L' • Redwood City,. California 94063 • • • File No.• ND-89P Project Title: Gittelsohn Property Type of Permit: Reclassification Legal Description: Lot 3 Block 4 Burlingame Park Portion of,APN 028-291-010 _Zone: R-1 Property Owner: Name: Sol and Hope Gittelsohn• Address: 1500 Howard Avenue App scan . Name: Sol Gittelsohn _ Address Contact Person• Area Code: Phone: 343-3758 i PROJECT DESCRIP.TI`-id:^Reclassify one lot from R-1 to R-3 to rombi6e twn lntc into one R-3 parcel. A single'family dwelling is located on -two lots at the northwesterly corner of 11 Camino Real and Howard Avenue. No immediate project has been proposed just the rezoning of one R-1 lot. l The City of Burlingame by 4layne M. Swan on August 4, 197E . 19 76 , completed a review of the proposed projeot and detei-mined that: {. ) It will not have a significant effect on the environn:er_t. (X) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Environmental -impact Report EIR-32P for the reclassification Reasons for a Conclusion: • PC. Res. No.2-75 and later modi e. an cer i ie y e ci y counei pri Reclassification of this lot was recommended by Pr a rIo 3-75 adnoted i4ar_cn u The resulting R-3 parcel would be 12, 560 S.F. in area. The urban corner lot could be l Improved with an 8 to 10 unit apartment building fronting on Howard with a 20 foot side setback from E1 Camino such an improvement would have little or no adverse impact but measurable benefits to the City .of Burlingame. (� Date Sig ed SignatuYe c� Processing O�_ic_�1 City Planner Title Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the &-termis:=_=ion shall be final. Date Posted: MCLAI.A ION OF POSTING I declare under penalty of perjury that I and a Deputy City Clerk of the- Ci.ty of Burlinganiae and that I posted a true copy of the above Mega ti-`e Declaration at the City Ball of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers on: Executed at Burlingame, California, on 197 Appealed: ( ) Yes ( ).No Deputy City Clerk ATTEST: EVELYN II. HILL, City Clerk City of Burlingame so* an I / EL, 2 � 22 x 25 RECLAsSII"ICATION FRcm R-I To R-3 DI STRICT 32�FC-Rat-1C;7-- Etr-. - 32_P 7410/75 CAMINO REAL 23 24 27.. 2 9 x., y m�. -0�a . 2 8 I b O y I 60' Present R-3 boundary . awlM Sor /yeti - 27 cz