HomeMy WebLinkAboutAmendment - No separator sheet p2-7. -' �
��� CIT7 O�
BURLJNGAME
q, e
b0 q0
�AATm JUM! 6•
The City of Burlingame
CIT'Y HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 7'EL: (650) 558-7250
PLANTTING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFOiWIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790
September 18, 2002
Deniz Salon
1290 Bayshore Blvd. #250
Burlingame CA 94010
Dear Mr. Salon:
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the September 9, 2002 Planning
Commission approval of your application for an amendment to an approved application for design
review and front setback variance became effective September 16, 2002. This application was to
allow for an amendment to application for first and second floor additions to an existing dwelling
at 1509 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1.
The September 9, 2002 minutes of the Planning Commission state your application was approved
with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on *.1:� plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped August 30, 2002, Sheets A.1 through A.4, and date stamped November 29,
2001, Sheet L1;
2. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official memos dated October
22, 2001 and November 15, 2001 shall be met; and the Recycling Specialist's memo dated
August 26, 2002, shall be met;
3. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope
of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the
structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that all the windows on the approved plans, shown as true divided light windows, shall be
installed as true divided lights with wood trim;
., �
5. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling
ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Reimbursement of your design review deposit has been processed and will be mailed the property
owner under separate cover.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building
Department. This approval is valid for one year during which time a building permit must be issued.
One extension of up to one year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is
made before the end of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6. If you wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must
do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or
federal law.
Sincerely yours,
�i�cr�Yh,��
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
EL�s
1509HOWA.cca
c. Chief Building Inspector
Chief Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(LOT 3 BLOCK 5 BURLINGAME PARK NO 2 RSM B/17; APN: 028-292-260)
�
R�CORDING RLQUESTED BY:
Planning Depart�nent
City'uf Burliugame
W HEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMGNT
CITY OP BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROS6 ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
�OG t� 2002-203423
1�/10/2002 09:53A R1 Fee:NC
pa9e 1 of 4
Recorded in Officia.l Records
County of San Mateo
4�sFssor-County ClerkmRecorder
Recerded By
� ' ' '' I I
� �
I I ��'' I��� �I I � II
I. I � ,�
� i�lll t
I�III �
�II ,
I���
I,III
IIII
III
III
II
III
I
Resolution No. 89-2002
1509 HOWARD AVENUE; APN: 029-292-260
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in
my office.
Date: 09.18.02
Marg ret Monroe, City Planner
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND A
FRONT SEBACK VARIANCE
RESOLUTION 89-2002
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for an
amendment to an approved application for design review and front setback variance for first and second story
additions at 1509 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, Deniz Salon, propertv owner, APN: 028-292-260;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 9, 2002, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials
and testimony presented at said hearing; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: i5301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures
provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before
the addition.
2. Said design review amendment is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for the design review amendment are as set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
. CHAIRM
I, Ralph Osterling, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regulax meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 9�' day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: CONIMISSIONERS: Auran, Bojues, Brownrigg, Keele, Keighran, Osterling and Vistica
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
NONE
� se
SECRETARY
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII � 00 �2 0203423
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for amendment to approved design review and front setback variance
1509 HOWARD AVENUE
effective September 16, 2002
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped August 30, 2002, Sheets A.1 through A.4, and date stamped November 29,
2001, Sheet L1;
2. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official memos dated October
22, 2001 and November 15, 2001 shall be met; and the Recycling Specialist's memo dated
August 26, 2002, shall be met;
3. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope
of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the
structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that all the windows on the approved plans, shown as true divided light windows, shall be
installed as true divided lights with wood trim;
5. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling
ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and
6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��0@002 0203423
age, 3 of 4
. �
� .
ROUTING FORM
DATE: August 26, 2002
TO: _City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
�Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for amendment for changes to an approved design review and front setback
variance for a fust and second story addition at 1509 Howard Avenue, zoned R-1, APN:
028-292-260.
STAFF REVIEW: Monday. Au�ust 26, 2002
� � ��C-��- G�W�► �[�(�Vl/L � �i� �vtiv► ��
�
�' ;�,c�� ✓'U.�� c ���;�n J �' S �r � -
� �
J�. ��-d�-�-�-�� c�- r.� _ �, � d-��
� �
l j�,,�� �,�n.,' ''e.�.�'�-,'`'� ° �
Reviewed By: — Date of Comments: �N.�� �0 �—
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �00� 4 0203423